TWO THEOREMS ON THE FOCUS-SHARING ELLIPSES: A THREE-DIMENSIONAL VIEW

Similar documents
The Distance Formula. The Midpoint Formula

Conic Sections Session 2: Ellipse

ON CIRCLES TOUCHING THE INCIRCLE

y mx 25m 25 4 circle. Then the perpendicular distance of tangent from the centre (0, 0) is the radius. Since tangent

3. A( 2,0) and B(6, -2), find M 4. A( 3, 7) and M(4,-3), find B. 5. M(4, -9) and B( -10, 11) find A 6. B(4, 8) and M(-2, 5), find A

Distance and Midpoint Formula 7.1

Analytic Geometry MAT 1035

Conic Sections. Geometry - Conics ~1~ NJCTL.org. Write the following equations in standard form.

Senior Math Circles February 18, 2009 Conics III

Analytic Geometry MAT 1035

Conic Sections Session 3: Hyperbola

Circles. Example 2: Write an equation for a circle if the enpoints of a diameter are at ( 4,5) and (6, 3).

3. A( 2,0) and B(6, -2), find M 4. A( 3, 7) and M(4,-3), find B. 5. M(4, -9) and B( -10, 11) find A 6. B(4, 8) and M(-2, 5), find A

Conic section. Ans: c. Ans: a. Ans: c. Episode:43 Faculty: Prof. A. NAGARAJ. 1. A circle

Conic Sections: THE ELLIPSE

INTERSECTION OF THREE QUADRIC IN THE SPECIAL POSITION Milada Kočandrlová

January 21, 2018 Math 9. Geometry. The method of coordinates (continued). Ellipse. Hyperbola. Parabola.

SMT Power Round Solutions : Poles and Polars

QUESTION BANK ON. CONIC SECTION (Parabola, Ellipse & Hyperbola)

TARGET : JEE 2013 SCORE. JEE (Advanced) Home Assignment # 03. Kota Chandigarh Ahmedabad

Introduction to Computer Graphics (Lecture No 07) Ellipse and Other Curves

The Love for the Three Conics

MODEL ANSWERS TO HWK #3

ON SOME PROPERTIES OF CONFOCAL CONICS

+ 2gx + 2fy + c = 0 if S

1. Projective geometry

Chapter 3. Coaxial circles. 3.1 The radical axis of two circles. A quadratic equation of the form

Mathematics Precalculus: Academic Unit 7: Conics

Harmonic quadrangle in isotropic plane

MORE ON THE PEDAL PROPERTY OF THE ELLIPSE

MATH10000 Mathematical Workshop Project 2 Part 1 Conic Sections

Objective Mathematics

Introduction to conic sections. Author: Eduard Ortega

The Lemniscate of Bernoulli, without Formulas

OHSx XM521 Multivariable Differential Calculus: Homework Solutions 13.1

by Abhijit Kumar Jha

Topic 2 [312 marks] The rectangle ABCD is inscribed in a circle. Sides [AD] and [AB] have lengths

Hyperbolic Geometry of 2+1 Spacetime: Static Hypertext Version

Theorem on altitudes and the Jacobi identity

(x 1, y 1 ) = (x 2, y 2 ) if and only if x 1 = x 2 and y 1 = y 2.

Standardized Test Practice

3.4 Conic sections. Such type of curves are called conics, because they arise from different slices through a cone

Geometry and the Imagination

Senior Math Circles February 11, 2009 Conics II

Page 1

From the SelectedWorks of Harish Chandra Rajpoot H.C. Rajpoot. Harish Chandra Rajpoot Rajpoot, HCR. Winter February 24, 2015

Recognise the Equation of a Circle. Solve Problems about Circles Centred at O. Co-Ordinate Geometry of the Circle - Outcomes

Reconstructing an Ellipsoid from its Perspective Projection onto a Plane

Circles, Mixed Exercise 6

QUESTION BANK ON STRAIGHT LINE AND CIRCLE

SYSTEM OF CIRCLES OBJECTIVES (a) Touch each other internally (b) Touch each other externally

Geometry. A. Right Triangle. Legs of a right triangle : a, b. Hypotenuse : c. Altitude : h. Medians : m a, m b, m c. Angles :,

INVERSION IN THE PLANE BERKELEY MATH CIRCLE

chapter 1 vector geometry solutions V Consider the parallelogram shown alongside. Which of the following statements are true?

Device Constructions with Hyperbolas

Einstein Classes, Unit No. 102, 103, Vardhman Ring Road Plaza, Vikas Puri Extn., Outer Ring Road New Delhi , Ph. : ,

1987 IMO Shortlist. IMO Shortlist 1987

Finite affine planes in projective spaces

2. A die is rolled 3 times, the probability of getting a number larger than the previous number each time is

Conics. Chapter 6. When you do this Exercise, you will see that the intersections are of the form. ax 2 + bxy + cy 2 + ex + fy + g =0, (1)

CIRCLES: #1. What is an equation of the circle at the origin and radius 12?

DAY 139 EQUATION OF A HYPERBOLA

Math 234. What you should know on day one. August 28, You should be able to use general principles like. x = cos t, y = sin t, 0 t π.

l (D) 36 (C) 9 x + a sin at which the tangent is parallel to x-axis lie on

MECH 576 Geometry in Mechanics September 16, 2009 Using Line Geometry

TS EAMCET 2016 SYLLABUS ENGINEERING STREAM

Chapter 1. Theorems of Ceva and Menelaus

Isogonal Conjugates. Navneel Singhal October 9, Abstract

1.1 Line Reflections and Point Reflections

Circles. 1 Page Hannah Province Mathematics Department Southwest Tn Community College

Two applications of the theorem of Carnot

Practice Set for IIT JEE. Paper I

Parabola. The fixed point is called the focus and it is denoted by S. A (0, 0), S (a, 0) and P (x 1, y 1 ) PM=NZ=NA+AZ= x 1 + a

(D) (A) Q.3 To which of the following circles, the line y x + 3 = 0 is normal at the point ? 2 (A) 2

Power Round: Geometry Revisited

GEOMETRY OF KIEPERT AND GRINBERG MYAKISHEV HYPERBOLAS

are in c) A B (D) 2 = {4,5,6} by = {(4,4), (5,5), (6,6)} is (C) (B) 0 < (C) 0 = 8, = 5 = 8, = 8 (B) (D) (C) 2 +

Mathematics Syllabus UNIT I ALGEBRA : 1. SETS, RELATIONS AND FUNCTIONS

SOLVED SUBJECTIVE EXAMPLES

1966 IMO Shortlist. IMO Shortlist 1966

Two applications of the theorem of Carnot

1. The positive zero of y = x 2 + 2x 3/5 is, to the nearest tenth, equal to

Discussion of the general form for light waves ( )

Theorem 1.2 (Converse of Pythagoras theorem). If the lengths of the sides of ABC satisfy a 2 + b 2 = c 2, then the triangle has a right angle at C.

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.ag] 3 Mar 2002

9.1 Circles and Parabolas. Copyright Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

A New Generalization of the Butterfly Theorem

THE ENVELOPE OF LINES MEETING A FIXED LINE AND TANGENT TO TWO SPHERES

International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Volume 30 No ,

SOME NEW THEOREMS IN PLANE GEOMETRY. In this article we will represent some ideas and a lot of new theorems in plane geometry.

Q1. If (1, 2) lies on the circle. x 2 + y 2 + 2gx + 2fy + c = 0. which is concentric with the circle x 2 + y 2 +4x + 2y 5 = 0 then c =

Math & 8.7 Circle Properties 8.6 #1 AND #2 TANGENTS AND CHORDS

Collinearity/Concurrence

Honors Precalculus Chapter 8 Summary Conic Sections- Parabola

Calculus III. George Voutsadakis 1. LSSU Math 251. Lake Superior State University. 1 Mathematics and Computer Science

On Emelyanov s Circle Theorem

KEMATH1 Calculus for Chemistry and Biochemistry Students. Francis Joseph H. Campeña, De La Salle University Manila

40th International Mathematical Olympiad

Singapore International Mathematical Olympiad Training Problems

Give a geometric description of the set of points in space whose coordinates satisfy the given pair of equations.

Transcription:

TWO THEOREMS ON THE FOCUS-SHARING ELLIPSES: A THREE-DIMENSIONAL VIEW ILYA I. BOGDANOV Abstract. Consider three ellipses each two of which share a common focus. The radical axes of the pairs of these ellipses are concurrent, and the points of intersection of the common tangents to the pairs of these ellipses are collinear. We present short synthetical proofs of these facts. Both proofs deal with the prolate spheroids having the given ellipses as axial sections. 1. Introduction We present synthetical proofs of two theorems on three ellipses sharing common foci. The proofs deal with three-dimensional interpretation of the configuration. Throughout the paper, we speak on the intersection of lines and planes in a projective sense; thus, all the points of intersection may appear to be ideal. Both theorems deal with the following configuration. Let E 1, E 2, E 3 be three ellipses such that each two of them share a common focus. We assume that none of the ellipses lies inside the other one. Note that there exist two different configurations satisfying this property: three ellipses with a common focus, and three ellipses with the pairs of foci (A, B), (A, C), and (B, C). Our proofs do not distinguish these cases. The first theorem was firstly proved by J. H. Neville [2]. There are some synthetical proofs of this theorem, see, for instance, [1]. Theorem 1. Let A ij, B ij (1 i < j 3) be the points of intersection of ellipses E i and E j. Then the lines A 12 B 12, A 13 B 13, and A 23 B 23 are concurrent. A 12 A 12 A 13 A 23 A 23 B 13 A 13 B 12 B 23 B 12 B 13 Fig. 1. 1 B 23

2 ILYA I. BOGDANOV The second one was noticed by A. Akopyan; he revealed it to the author in a private communication. In some rough sense, it may be considered as a dual theorem to the previous one. Theorem 2. Let a ij, b ij be the two common tangents to E i and E j (1 i < j 3); denote by K ij the point of their intersection. Then the points K 12, K 13, and K 23 are collinear. K 13 K 12 b 13 a 13 a 12 b 12 a 23 K 23 b 23 Fig. 2. K 13 K 12 a 12 a 13 b 13 b 12 K 23 a 23 b 23 Fig. 3. Remark 1. If all three ellipses E 1, E 2, E 3 have a common focus F, then they become circles under a duality transform with a center F. Hence in this case both facts allow simpler proofs. In the proofs of both theorems, we use some geometrical features of ellipses and ellipsoids. Here we recall some basic definitions and properties.

TWO THEOREMS ON THE FOCUS-SHARING ELLIPSES: A THREE-DIMENSIONAL VIEW 3 Let F 1, F 2 be two points in the plane, and a > F 1 F 2 be some real number. An ellipse E with foci F 1, F 2 and major axis a is the locus of the points X in the plane such that XF 1 + XF 2 = a. We always assume that F 1 F 2. For each focus F i of E, there exists a corresponding line d i which is called a directrix such that E is the locus of points X in the plane such that the ratio XF i /ρ(x, d i ) is constant. The value ε of this ratio is called the eccentricity of ellipse E. Let l be a line tangent to E at some point X. Then the segments F 1 X and F 2 X form equal angles with l. In other words, if F 1 is the point symmetrical to F 1 about l, then the points F 1, X, F 2 are collinear. This property is called the optical property of an ellipse. For every ellipse, we construct a corresponding spheroid in the following way. Definition 1. Let E be an ellipse with foci F 1, F 2 and major axis a. Consider a spheroid D obtained by rotating E about the axis F 1 F 2 ; we call D a spheroid generated by E. The foci, major axis, and eccentricity of this spheroid are defined as those for the ellipse E. Remark 2. The spheroid of rotation D is sometimes called a prolate spheroid in contrast to oblate spheroid obtained from an ellipse by rotating it about its minor axis. The next geometrical properties of spheroid D can be derived easily from the properties of ellipse mentioned above. First, spheroid D is the locus of points X in the space such that XF 1 + XF 2 = a. Next, for a focus F i, define the corresponding directrix plane δ i as the plane perpendicular to the plane of the ellipse and containing the directrix d i. Then D is the locus of points X in the space such that the ratio XF i /ρ(x, δ i ) = ε (here, ε is again the eccentricity of ellipse E). Finally, let λ be a plane tangent to E at some point X, and let F 1 be the point symmetrical to F 1 about λ. Then the points F 1, X, F 2 are collinear. We need the following lemma. 2. Proof of Theorem 1 Lemma 1. Let A, B, C be three non-collinear points, and let D 1, D 2 be two prolate spheroids with foci A, B and A, C, respectively. Then all their common points belong to a plane perpendicular to the plane (ABC). Proof. Let δ 1, δ 2 be the directrix planes of D 1 and D 2 corresponding to the common focus A, and ε 1, ε 2 be their eccentrities. Consider any common point X of D 1 and D 2. Then it shares the same side of δ 1 as A; analogously, it shares the same side of δ 2 as A. Thus, all such points lie in one dihedral angle defined by δ 1 and δ 2. Next, from the directrix property we have AX = ε 1 ρ(x, δ 1 ) = ε 2 ρ(x, δ 2 ). Hence ρ(x, δ 1) ρ(x, δ 2 ) = ε 2. Obviously, all such points in our dihedral angle lie in some ε 1

4 ILYA I. BOGDANOV plane γ (the planes γ, δ 1, and δ 2 intersect by a line). Finally, from the symmetry about the plane (ABC) we obtain that γ (ABC). Proof of Theorem 1. Denote by α the plane containing the ellipses E 1, E 2, and E 3. Let D 1, D 2, and D 3 be the spheroids generated by E 1, E 2, and E 3. We consider only the case when these three spheroids share a common point T. By Lemma 1, for every 1 i < j 3 there exists a plane γ ij containing all the common points of D i and D j, and γ ij α. Then the projection of γ ij onto α is a line, and it contains the points A ij and B ij ; hence this projection is the line A ij B ij. On the other hand, point T belongs to all three planes γ ij, hence its projection is the common point of all three lines A ij B ij. Thus the theorem is proved. Remark 3. To extend this proof to the case when there is no point of intersection of the three spheroids, one may consider them in the complex three-dimensional space C 3. In this space, our three spheroids always share a common point. We also need an auxiliary lemma. 3. Proof of Theorem 2 Lemma 2. Let A, B, C be three non-collinear points, and let D 1, D 2 be two prolate spheroids with foci A, B and A, C, respectively. Then all the planes tangent to both spheroids share a common point on the line BC. Proof. Let λ be some plane tangent to D 1, D 2 at points X 1, X 2. Denote by b and c the major axes of D 1 and D 2, respectively. Let the point A be the reflection of A about λ. By the optical property, the points A, X 1, B are collinear (X lies between A and B), and hence A B = A X 1 + X 1 B = AX 1 + X 1 B = b. Analogously, A C = c. Thus, the point A belongs to the intersection of two spheres with centers B, C and radii b, c, respectively. This intersection is some circle Γ (independent of λ) with the center lying on the line BC. Now consider the sphere S containing Γ and A; let O be its center (this sphere may degenerate to a plane; in this case, O is an ideal point). Since the line BC is perpendicular to Γ and contains its center, the point O is collinear with B and C. Recall that λ is a perpendicular bisector of the segment AA, and both points A and A belong to S. Hence λ contains a fixed point O. Remark 4. It is easy to note that O is an ideal point if and only if AB 2 AC 2 = b 2 c 2. One may see also that all the common tangents λ touch some cone whose apex is O, and base is some conic. Proof of Theorem 2. Again, we denote by α the plane containing the ellipses E 1, E 2, and E 3, and consider the spheroids D 1, D 2, and D 3 generated by E 1, E 2, and E 3. By Lemma 2, for every 1 i < j 3 there exists a common point O ij of all the common tangent planes to D i and D j. The lines a ij and b ij belong to

TWO THEOREMS ON THE FOCUS-SHARING ELLIPSES: A THREE-DIMENSIONAL VIEW 5 some common tangent planes to D i and D j (these planes are perpendicular to α). Hence we have K ij = O ij. We consider only the case when there exists a plane λ tangent to all three spheroids. Surely, λ is different from α. Hence all three points O ij belong to the line α λ, therefore they are collinear. Remark 5. The extention to the general case is analogous to that in the previous theorem. That is, one may consider any complex plane λ touching all three ellipsoids; such plane always exists. The author is very grateful to A.V. Akopyan for the motivation and valuable remarks. References [1] B. Lawrence. 1238. note on focus sharing conics. The Mathematical Gazette, 21(243):160 161, 1937. [2] E. Neville. A focus-sharing set of three conics. The Mathematical Gazette, 20(239):182 183, 1936. E-mail address: ilya.i.bogdanov@gmail.com Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology