Let b be the distance of closest approach between the trajectory of the center of the moving ball and the center of the stationary one.

Similar documents
Lecture: Scattering theory

Quantum Mechanics II

Lecture 5 Scattering theory, Born Approximation. SS2011: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics, Part 2 2

Phys 622 Problems Chapter 6

Solution Set of Homework # 2. Friday, September 09, 2017

Multipole Expansion for Radiation;Vector Spherical Harmonics

Introduction to Elementary Particle Physics I

Chapter 10: QUANTUM SCATTERING

Quantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2008 Assignment 10

Physics 216 Problem Set 4 Spring 2010 DUE: MAY 25, 2010

Scattering amplitude and partial waves. f(θ) = (2l + 1)f l P l (cos(θ)) (3)

Quantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2005 Assignment 9

16. Elastic Scattering Michael Fowler

Quantum Mechanics II SS Roser Valentí Institut für Theoretische Physik Universität Frankfurt

from which follow by application of chain rule relations y = y (4) ˆL z = i h by constructing θ , find also ˆL x ˆL y and

Lecture 22 Highlights Phys 402

1 r 2 sin 2 θ. This must be the case as we can see by the following argument + L2

Classical Scattering

Quantum Mechanics II Lecture 11 ( David Ritchie

Lecture 6 Scattering theory Partial Wave Analysis. SS2011: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics, Part 2 2

Scattering Cross Sections, Classical and QM Methods

Physics 580: Quantum Mechanics I Department of Physics, UIUC Fall Semester 2017 Professor Eduardo Fradkin

Physics Dec The Maxwell Velocity Distribution

Non-relativistic scattering

221B Lecture Notes Scattering Theory II

Scattering. 1 Classical scattering of a charged particle (Rutherford Scattering)

Spring /2/ pts 1 point per minute

Comparative study of scattering by hard core and absorptive potential

Quantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2007 FINAL EXAMINATION Monday May 21, 9:00 am You have 3 hours.

Electron Atom Scattering

Numerical simulations of neutron scattering cross sections for heavy nuclei

Decays and Scattering. Decay Rates Cross Sections Calculating Decays Scattering Lifetime of Particles

Part II Applications of Quantum Mechanics Lent 2010

does not change the dynamics of the system, i.e. that it leaves the Schrödinger equation invariant,

Some negative results on the use of Helmholtz integral equations for rough-surface scattering

Physics 505 Homework No. 12 Solutions S12-1

8/31/2018. PHY 711 Classical Mechanics and Mathematical Methods 10-10:50 AM MWF Olin 103

I. Elastic collisions of 2 particles II. Relate ψ and θ III. Relate ψ and ζ IV. Kinematics of elastic collisions

Physics 216 Spring The Optical Theorem

Quantum Mechanics in 3-Dimensions

Question. Why are oscillations not observed experimentally? ( is the same as but with spin-1 instead of spin-0. )

Electrodynamics II: Lecture 9

Scattering Theory. Two ways of stating the scattering problem. Rate vs. cross-section

Spherical Coordinates and Legendre Functions

University of Illinois at Chicago Department of Physics. Quantum Mechanics Qualifying Examination. January 7, 2013 (Tuesday) 9:00 am - 12:00 noon

Physics 342 Lecture 23. Radial Separation. Lecture 23. Physics 342 Quantum Mechanics I

Quantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2008 Final Exam Solutions

Physible: Interactive Physics Collection MA198 Proposal Rough Draft

Elastic Scattering. R = m 1r 1 + m 2 r 2 m 1 + m 2. is the center of mass which is known to move with a constant velocity (see previous lectures):

1 Schroenger s Equation for the Hydrogen Atom

[L 2, L z ] = 0 It means we can find the common set of eigen function for L 2 and L z. Suppose we have eigen function α, m > such that,

Decays, resonances and scattering

Elastic Collisions. Chapter Center of Mass Frame

Module I: Electromagnetic waves

Physics 4617/5617: Quantum Physics Course Lecture Notes

On spherical-wave scattering by a spherical scatterer and related near-field inverse problems

Theoretical Modeling of Near-Threshold Shape Resonance Behaviour in Photodetachment Experiments

Physics 139B Solutions to Homework Set 5 Fall 2009

Particles and Fields

PHY 5246: Theoretical Dynamics, Fall Assignment # 7, Solutions. Θ = π 2ψ, (1)

Lecture 3. Solving the Non-Relativistic Schroedinger Equation for a spherically symmetric potential

Universidad de Cantabria Facultad de Ciencias

The 3 dimensional Schrödinger Equation

Nondiffracting Waves in 2D and 3D

The curious properties of spin

Computations of Scattering Cross Sections for He, Ne, Ar, Kr, Xe and Rn

1. Estimate the lifetime of an excited state of hydrogen. Give your answer in terms of fundamental constants.

Scattering Tutorial. Erich Mueller. August 12, 2002

Nucleon Transfer within Distorted Wave Born Approximation

Electrodynamics Exam Solutions

221B Lecture Notes Notes on Spherical Bessel Functions

Introduction to Spherical Harmonics

The Hydrogen Atom. Dr. Sabry El-Taher 1. e 4. U U r

Physics 221B Spring 2019 Notes 37 The Lippmann-Schwinger Equation and Formal Scattering Theory

Lecture notes 5: Diffraction

Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry

PHYS 3313 Section 001 Lecture # 22

Scattering of Particles and Radiation in Astrophysical Environments

1 Commutators (10 pts)

Solutions to exam : 1FA352 Quantum Mechanics 10 hp 1

Scattering Theory. In quantum mechanics the basic observable is the probability

(a) Determine the general solution for φ(ρ) near ρ = 0 for arbitary values E. (b) Show that the regular solution at ρ = 0 has the series expansion

Scattering is perhaps the most important experimental technique for exploring the structure of matter.

Scattering. March 20, 2016

David J. Starling Penn State Hazleton PHYS 214

PHYSICS DEPARTMENT, PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PHYSICS 505 FINAL EXAMINATION. January 18, 2013, 1:30 4:30pm, A06 Jadwin Hall SOLUTIONS

ψ( ) k (r) which take the asymtotic form far away from the scattering center: k (r) = E kψ (±) φ k (r) = e ikr

Chapter 8. Orbits. 8.1 Conics

Applied Nuclear Physics (Fall 2006) Lecture 19 (11/22/06) Gamma Interactions: Compton Scattering

Lecture 11 March 1, 2010

Chapter 3-Elastic Scattering Small-Angle, Elastic Scattering from Atoms Head-On Elastic Collision in 1-D

5.62 Physical Chemistry II Spring 2008

20 The Hydrogen Atom. Ze2 r R (20.1) H( r, R) = h2 2m 2 r h2 2M 2 R

Distorted Wave Born Approximation For Inelastic Atomic Collision

UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND Department of Physics College Park, Maryland. PHYSICS Ph.D. QUALIFYING EXAMINATION PART II

Quantum Condensed Matter Physics Lecture 5

A.4 - Elements of collision theory 181

Scattering cross-section (µm 2 )

Physics of Finite and Infinite Nuclear Systems Phys. 477 (542)

Chapter 1 Potential Scattering

Transcription:

Scattering Classical model As a model for the classical approach to collision, consider the case of a billiard ball colliding with a stationary one. The scattering direction quite clearly depends rather sensitively on where the first ball strikes the second. This is traditionally parametrized in terms of b, the impact parameter. Let b be the distance of closest approach between the trajectory of the center of the moving ball and the center of the stationary one. Similarly the direction of the scattering is parametrized by θ, the angle between the asymptotic exiting trajectory and the incoming trajectory. θ is 0 in the absence of collision and 180 if the incoming ball is knocked back along its incoming trajectory.

Figure 11.2 - Classical elastic hard-sphere scattering. Assuming that the stationary ball is so massive that it will not move during the collision, it is a geometry exercise to show that b = R cos(θ/2), yielding the scattering angle as a function of impact parameter for what is known as hard-sphere scattering. More generally, particles incident within an infinitesimal patch of cross-sectional area dσ will scatter into a corresponding infinitesimal solid angle dω. The ratio of these, which clearly is a function of the location of dσ, is called the differential scattering cross-section, D(θ) dσ/dω.

Figure 11.3 - Particles incident in the area dσ scatter into the solid angle /dω. Note that D is a function only of θ because the scatterer is symmetric with azimuthal angle φ, the only other parameter necessary to specify completely a direction. On the other hand, dω = sin θdθdφ and dσ = bdbdφ, so D(θ) = db. The total b sin θ scattering cross-section is the integral of D over all angles, σ dωd(θ). dθ For hard-sphere scattering, D(θ) = R2 4 and σ = πr 2, a comforting result.

Quantum model In developing a quantum theory, it is natural to start with a plane wave ψ(z) = Ae ikz, traveling in the z direction, incident on a potential which scatters that plane wave, creating an outgoing spherical wave. Figure 11.4 - Scattering of waves: incoming plane wave e ikz generates outgoing spherical wave.

This leads to solutions of the Schrödinger equation of the general form ψ(r, θ) = A[e ikz + f(θ) eikr r ], for large r. We have restricted the scattering potential to have azimuthal symmetry, leading to an azimuthally symmetric scattered wave. Otherwise, f f(θ, φ). We have chosen to display the r dependence of the scattered state explicitly; which dependence is required to conserve probability. Finally, k 2mE.

We now want to relate the scattering amplitude, f, which is the probability of scattering in a given direction θ, with the differential cross-section. The probability that the incident particle, traveling at speed v, passes through the infinitesimal area dσ in time dt is dp = ψ incident 2 dv = A 2 (vdt)dσ. Figure 11.5 - The volume dv of incident beam that passes through area dσ in time dt. But this is equal to the probability that the particle later emerges into the corresponding angle dω, i.e., dp = ψ scattered 2 dv = A 2 f 2 (vdt)r 2 dω. r 2

Equating these two expressions implies dσ = f 2 dω, or D(θ) = dσ dω = f(θ) 2. In words, the differential scattering cross-section is determined by the scattering amplitude, obtained by solving the Schrödinger equation. In the remainder of the chapter, we investigate two techniques for calculating these quantities.

Partial wave analysis Most useful calculational techniques involve a critical approximation or assumption. In this case, we assume that the scattering potential is localized in space, allowing us to use solutions for the spherically symmetric Schrödinger equation while in the region external to the potential. This approximation would not allow us to treat scattering from an unscreened Coulomb potential, for example. The Schrödinger equation for a spherically symmetric geometry can be solved by assuming a product solution: ψ(r, θ, φ) = R(r)Yl m (θ, φ), where the Yl m are the spherical harmonics and u(r) = rr(r) satisfies 2 d 2 u 2m dr 2 + [ V (r) + 2 2m with normalization dr u 2 = 1. ] l(l + 1) r 2 u = Eu,

Figure 11.6 - Scattering from a localized potential: the scattering region (shaded dark), the intermediate region (where V = 0), and the radiation zone (where kr 1). For very large r, both terms in square brackets 0, and the differential equation d2 u dr 2 k2 u for E > 0. The solutions to this equation are u(r) = Ce ikr + De ikr. Since Ψ(r, t) = ψ(r)e iet/, the first term represents an outgoing spherical wave, and the second an incoming one. D = 0 and R(r) eikr r, a result which has already been incorporated in the form for a scattered wave. This is the solution for very large r (or, more precisely, for kr 1), a region corresponding to the radiation zone in optics.

Suppose we are closer to the potential, but still outside its range. Including the centrifugal term, the d.e. becomes d2 u dr 2 l(l+1) r 2 u = k 2 u. The solutions of this equation are the spherical Bessel functions, j l (kr) and n l (kr). If our solutions were plane waves we could choose to use either sin(x) and cos(x) as a complete set of functions, or e ix and e ix. Similarly, for this d.e. we have a choice between j l and n l, or h (1) l and h (2), the spherical Hankel functions. The latter set is better in this instance since, as r, h (1) l (kr) = j l (kr) + n l (kr) ( i) l+1 e ikr kr. Therefore, in the external region where V (r) = 0, the solution is ψ(r, θ, φ) = A[e ikz + l,m C l,m h (1) l l (kr)yl m (θ, φ)]. The (potentially infinite) sum over l and m generalizes this w.f. to express the large r solution for any localized potential.

Comparing this expression for ψ in the limit as r with the earlier expression involving f yields f(θ, φ) = 1 k l,m ( i) l+1 C l,m Y m (θ, φ). This leads directly to corresponding expressions for D and σ. Somewhat simpler expressions would have resulted if V were independent of φ, as is usually the case. l Partial wave analysis proceeds by solving the Schrödinger equation in the interior region, where V (r) is definitely not zero, and then matching this to the exterior solution given above, thereby determining the C l,m. In doing this, it is helpful to expand e ikz in spherical harmonics, leading to ψ(r, θ, φ) = A [δ m,0 4π(2l + 1)i l j l (kr) l,m +C l,m h (1) ] l (kr) Yl m (θ, φ).

Integral form of the Schrödinger equation The Schrödinger equation, 2m 2 2 ψ + V ψ = Eψ, can be written as ( 2 + k 2 )ψ = Q, where k Q 2m 2 V ψ. 2mE and This would be the Helmholtz equation were it not that Q depends in fact on ψ. Suppose we had a solution, G, to the Helmholtz equation with a δ-function source, ( 2 + k 2 )G(r) = δ 3 (r). Then we could express ψ as an integral: ψ(r) = d 3 r G(r r )Q(r ). G is called the Green s function for the three-dimensional Helmholtz equation. Some manipulation, including using Cauchy s integral formula to evaluate contour integrals in complex space, yields in due course G(r) = 4πr eikr. This is the free-particle Green s function.

Adding a solution of the homogeneous equation to G and incorporating the 2m 2 factor leads to the following integral equation: ψ(r) = ψ 0 (r) + d 3 r g(r r )V (r )ψ(r ), where ψ 0 satisfies the free-particle Schrödinger equation and g(r) m 2π 2 eikr r. This equation is completely equivalent to the differential Schrödinger equation. Schematically, ψ = ψ 0 + gv ψ. Iterating, ψ = ψ 0 + gv ψ 0 + gv gv ψ 0 +.... This series is a sensible approach if V is small, and is called the Born series. Figure 11.13 - A diagrammatic representation of the Born series.

Born approximation in scattering The Born approximation results when the potential is taken to be so small that only the first power of V in the Born series is important, yielding ψ = ψ 0 + gv ψ 0. ψ(r) = ψ 0 (r) + d 3 r g(r r )V (r )ψ 0 (r ) The potential is negligible except near r = 0. Far away from the scattering center, r r. Then r r = r r r /r and = eikr r e ik r, where k kˆr. e ik r r r r Let ψ 0 (r ) = Ae ikz = Ae ik r, where k kẑ. Note that k points in the direction of the incident beam, while k points toward the detector.

Figure 11.11 - The two wave vectors in the Born approximation: k points in the incident direction; k in the scattered direction; κ k k. Comparing the above expression for ψ with the equation involving f yields f(θ, φ) = m 2π 2 d 3 r e i(k k) r V (r ), plus related expressions.