Euler-Poincaré reduction in principal bundles by a subgroup of the structure group

Similar documents
Reduction of Homogeneous Riemannian structures

Special Conformal Invariance

Chapter 2 Noether s First Theorem

A CRASH COURSE IN EULER-POINCARÉ REDUCTION

COSYMPLECTIC REDUCTION OF CONSTRAINED SYSTEMS WITH SYMMETRY

Exercises in Geometry II University of Bonn, Summer semester 2015 Professor: Prof. Christian Blohmann Assistant: Saskia Voss Sheet 1

Part III Symmetries, Fields and Particles

Three Descriptions of the Cohomology of Bun G (X) (Lecture 4)

POISSON-LIE T-DUALITY AND INTEGRABLE SYSTEMS

Review of Lagrangian Mechanics and Reduction

Higgs Bundles and Character Varieties

Gauge Theory of Gravitation: Electro-Gravity Mixing

Group Actions and Cohomology in the Calculus of Variations

A DISCRETE THEORY OF CONNECTIONS ON PRINCIPAL BUNDLES

Hamilton-Jacobi theory on Lie algebroids: Applications to nonholonomic mechanics. Manuel de León Institute of Mathematical Sciences CSIC, Spain

Towards Discrete Exterior Calculus and Discrete Mechanics for Numerical Relativity

HAPPY BIRTHDAY TONY! Chicago Blochfest June 30, 2105

Reduction of Symplectic Lie Algebroids by a Lie Subalgebroid and a Symmetry Lie Group

Tulczyjew triples: from statics to field theory

Black Holes, Thermodynamics, and Lagrangians. Robert M. Wald

Scalar Electrodynamics. The principle of local gauge invariance. Lower-degree conservation

LECTURE 14: LIE GROUP ACTIONS

Metamorphoses for Pattern Matching

The Erlangen Program and General Relativity

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.dg] 3 Nov 2004

Cocycles and stream functions in quasigeostrophic motion

INSTANTON MODULI AND COMPACTIFICATION MATTHEW MAHOWALD

Twisted Poisson manifolds and their almost symplectically complete isotropic realizations

Mirror Symmetry: Introduction to the B Model

Nonlinear MHD Stability and Dynamical Accessibility

Noether Symmetries and Conserved Momenta of Dirac Equation in Presymplectic Dynamics

Asymptotic Stabilization of the Heavy Top Using Controlled Lagrangians 1

SUBTANGENT-LIKE STATISTICAL MANIFOLDS. 1. Introduction

Stress-energy tensor is the most important object in a field theory and have been studied

Model building using Lie-point symmetries

Reminder on basic differential geometry

arxiv:math-ph/ v1 22 May 2003

September 21, :43pm Holm Vol 2 WSPC/Book Trim Size for 9in by 6in

Quaternionic Complexes

M3-4-5 A16 Notes for Geometric Mechanics: Oct Nov 2011

Comparison for infinitesimal automorphisms. of parabolic geometries

SINGULAR SOLITONS, MOMENTUM MAPS & COMPUTATIONAL ANATOMY

Introduction to supersymmetry

Linear weakly Noetherian constants of motion are horizontal gauge momenta

Exercise 1 Classical Bosonic String

TRANSITIVE HOLONOMY GROUP AND RIGIDITY IN NONNEGATIVE CURVATURE. Luis Guijarro and Gerard Walschap

Covariant Lagrangian Formalism for Chern-Simons Theories

1 Introduction and preliminaries notions

The existence of light-like homogeneous geodesics in homogeneous Lorentzian manifolds. Sao Paulo, 2013

J.F. Cari~nena structures and that of groupoid. So we will nd topological groupoids, Lie groupoids, symplectic groupoids, Poisson groupoids and so on.

Vortex Equations on Riemannian Surfaces

Moment Maps and Toric Special Holonomy

Integrability and Associativity

Gauge Fixing and Constrained Dynamics in Numerical Relativity

Hamiltonian flows, cotangent lifts, and momentum maps

THE NEWLANDER-NIRENBERG THEOREM. GL. The frame bundle F GL is given by x M Fx

LECTURE 9: MOVING FRAMES IN THE NONHOMOGENOUS CASE: FRAME BUNDLES. 1. Introduction

Variational principles and Hamiltonian Mechanics

Quantum Field Theory Notes. Ryan D. Reece

1. Classifying Spaces. Classifying Spaces

A bundle-theoretic perspective to Kac Moody groups

Hard Lefschetz Theorem for Vaisman manifolds

Orientation transport

Modern Geometric Structures and Fields

= 0. = q i., q i = E

Routhian reduction for quasi-invariant Lagrangians

arxiv:math-ph/ v3 13 May 2005

Lifting General Relativity to Observer Space

Observer dependent background geometries arxiv:

ESSENTIAL KILLING FIELDS OF PARABOLIC GEOMETRIES: PROJECTIVE AND CONFORMAL STRUCTURES. 1. Introduction

Poincaré Duality Angles on Riemannian Manifolds with Boundary

On variational integrators for optimal control of mechanical control systems. Leonardo Colombo, David Martín de Diego and Marcela Zuccalli

SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY: LECTURE 5

Symmetries of Parabolic Geometries

GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 9 Jun 1994

Invariant Nonholonomic Riemannian Structures on Three-Dimensional Lie Groups

Optimal Collision Avoidance and Formation Switching on Riemannian Manifolds 1

Symmetries, Conservation Laws and Hamiltonian Structures in Geophysical Fluid Dynamics

A Criterion for Flatness of Sections of Adjoint Bundle of a Holomorphic Principal Bundle over a Riemann Surface

DIRAC COTANGENT BUNDLE REDUCTION HIROAKI YOSHIMURA JERROLD E. MARSDEN. (Communicated by Juan-Pablo Ortega)

SEMISIMPLE LIE GROUPS

Equivalence, Invariants, and Symmetry

Dynamics and Stability application to submerged bodies, vortex streets and vortex-body systems

Geometry of Conformal Field Theory

A solution in Weyl gravity with planar symmetry

LECTURE 26: THE CHERN-WEIL THEORY

1: Lie groups Matix groups, Lie algebras

DYNAMICS OF GENERALIZED EULER TOPS WITH CONSTRAINTS. Dmitry V. Zenkov, Anthony M. Bloch

Math 868 Final Exam. Part 1. Complete 5 of the following 7 sentences to make a precise definition (5 points each). Y (φ t ) Y lim

HYPERKÄHLER MANIFOLDS

Model building and Lie point symmetries

Homogeneous para-kähler Einstein manifolds. Dmitri V. Alekseevsky

Übungen zu RT2 SS (4) Show that (any) contraction of a (p, q) - tensor results in a (p 1, q 1) - tensor.

OPERATOR PENCIL PASSING THROUGH A GIVEN OPERATOR

The Real Grassmannian Gr(2, 4)

COHOMOGENEITY ONE HYPERSURFACES OF EUCLIDEAN SPACES

ROLLING OF A SYMMETRIC SPHERE ON A HORIZONTAL PLANE WITHOUT SLIDING OR SPINNING. Hernán Cendra 1. and MARÍA ETCHECHOURY

Canonical Structure of 2D Black Holes.

REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 7

Transcription:

Euler-Poincaré reduction in principal bundles by a subgroup of the structure group M. Castrillón López ICMAT(CSIC-UAM-UC3M-UCM) Universidad Complutense de Madrid (Spain) Joint work with Pedro L. García, University of Salamanca (Spain) César Rodrigo, Academia Millitar (Portugal). III Iberoamerican Meeting on Geometry, Mechanics and Control Salamanca, September 2012

. CONTENTS 1. Euler-Poincaré reduction for Field Theories 2. Reduction by a subgroup: the space 3. Reduction by a subgroup: the equations 4. Noether conservation law 5. Example: Mechanics 6. Reduction in affine principal bundles 7. Example: Molecular strands

REFERENCES M.C.L., P.L. García, T. Ratiu, Euler-Poincaré reduction on principal fiber bundles, Lett. Math. Phys. 58 (2001) 167 180. M.C.L., T.S. Ratiu, Reduction in principal bundles: covariant Lagrange-Poincaré equations, Comm. Math. Phys. 236 (2003), no. 2, 223.250. D.C.P. Ellis, F. Gay-Balmaz, D.D. Holm, V. Putkaradze, T.S. Ratiu, Symmetry reduced dynamics of charged molecular strands, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 197 (2010), no. 3, 811.902. D.C.P. Ellis, F. Gay-Balmaz, D.D. Holm, T.S. Ratiu, Lagrange-Poincaré field equations, J. Geom. Phys. 61 (2011), no. 11, 2120.2146. D. Holm, J.E. Marsden, T.S. Ratiu, The Euler-Poincaré equations and semidirect products with applications to continuum theories, Adv. in Math. 137, 1.81 (1998)

I.- EULER-POINCARÉ REDUCTION FOR FIELD THEORIES Euler-Poincaré reduction in Mechanics is paradigmatic: We have L : T G R invariant by G so that T G/G g l : g R with variations δσ = dη dt ± ad ση ( ) d δl EL(L) = 0 dt ad σ δσ = 0. In Field theories, we have sections of fiber bundles. In particular, we take π : P M and L : J 1 P R invariant with respect to the structure group G and defining a variational principle s L(j 1 s)v M

Theorem Given a local section s of P M and the local section σ = [j 1 s] G of (J 1 P )/G = C M, the following are equivalent: 1.-s satisfies the Euler-Lagrange equations for L, 2.-the variational principle δ M L(j 1 s)dx = 0 holds, for arbitrary variations with compact support, 3.-the Euler-Poincaré equations hold: 4.-the variational principle δ div σ δl δσ = 0, M holds, using variations of the form l(σ(x))dx = 0 δσ = σ η where η : U g is an arbitrary section of the adjoint bundle.

Remark: EP(l)(σ) = div σ δl δσ = 0 ( div H + ad σ H ) δl δσ = 0. Remark: If σ = [j 1 s] G, then σ is flat (Curv(σ) = 0) and the integral leaves of σ are the solutions s. EL(L)(s) = 0 loc EP(l)(σ) = 0 Curv(σ) = 0 If Θ L is the Poincaré-Cartan form, Nother theorem says d((j 1 s) i j1 BΘ L ) = 0, B g in J 1 P is equivalent to div σ δl δσ = 0.

II.- REDUCTION BY A SUBGROUP: THE SPACE We now consider L : J 1 P R invariant with respect to a subgroup H G. This is related with homogeneous manifolds G/H Relevant (regular) situations with symmetries fit in this context. It is connected with the notion of symmetry breaking. The reduction process contains the information of the general case. In fact, fiber bundles are generally G-bundles so that the symmetry group is usually H G. We first consider the dropped Lagrangian l : (J 1 P )/H R The geometry of the reduced space?

Lagrange-Poincaré approach: We fix a connection A and we have (J 1 P )/H J 1 (P/H) P/H T M h where h P/H is the adjoint bundle of the principal bundle P P/H. The reduced equations are split into two groups EL = curva EP = 0 BUT, the identification, the splitting and the gyroscopic terms are NOT canonical. Euler-Poincaré approach: Theorem Let H be a closed Lie subgroup of the structure group G of a principal bundle π : P M. Then the mapping is a fiber diffeomorphism. (J 1 P )/H C M P/H [j 1 xs] H ([j 1 xs] G, [s(x)] H )

Proposition For a (local) section s of P M and the induced (local) section j 1 s of J 1 P M, the induced section (σ = [j 1 s] G, s = [s] H ) of C M P/H = (J 1 P )/H, satisfies Curvσ = 0 σ s = 0. Recall that P/H M is the same as the associated bundle P G (G/H) = P (G/H) G M so that connections in P M induce covariant derivatives in P/H.

III.- REDUCTION BY A SUBGROUP: THE EQUATIONS Let δs be an arbitrary variation of a local section s of P M. We consider the gauge vector field X such that X Ims = δs. Recall Gauge vector fields G-invariant vertical vector fields in P sections of the adjoint bundle g M. Proposition The induced variations of the sections (σ = [j 1 s] G, s = [s] H ) of C M P/H = (J 1 P )/H are δσ = X C = σ η, δ s = (π H ) X = η P/H where π H : P P/H and X gaup η section of g.

We can thus define the operator P (σ, s) : gaup Γ(σ V C) Γ( s V (P/H)), P (σ, s) = (P σ, P s ) with P σ (X) = X C Im σ = σ η, P s (X) = (π H ) X Im s = ηp/h, The adjoint operator defined by P + (σ, s) : Γ(σ V C) Γ( s V (P/H)) Γ( g ) P + (σ, s) (X, Υ)(η) = X, P σ(η) + Υ, P s (η), with X Γ(σ V C) Γ(T M g ), Υ Γ( s V (P/H)), η Γ( g), and, the duality pairing, reads P + (σ, s) (X, Υ) = d X, divσ X + P + s (Υ), where P + s (Υ)(η) = Υ, η P/H.

Theorem Let L : J 1 P R be an H-invariant Lagrangian. Let l : C M P/H R be the reduced Lagrangian. For a (local) section s of P M and the induced section (σ, s) of C (P/H) M the following are equivalent: 1. the variational principle δ U L(j1 xs)v = 0 holds, for vertical variations δs along s with compact support, 2. the local section s satisfies the Euler-Lagrange equations for L, 3. the variational principle δ U variations of the form l(σ(x), s(x))v = 0 holds, using δσ = σ η, δ s = η P/H, for any section η of g with compact support, 4. the Euler-Poincaré equations hold: EP(l)(σ, s) := div σ δl δσ P+ s ( ) δl δ s where δl/δσ Γ(σ V C) Γ(T M g ) and δl/δ s Γ( s V (P/H)). = 0,

Reconstruction Theorem Let P M be a principal bundle over a simply-connected manifold and let L : J 1 P R be an H-invariant Lagrangian. Let l : C M P/H R be the reduced Lagrangian. For a (local) section s of P M and the induced section (σ, s) of C (P/H) M then EL(L)(s) = 0 EP(l)(σ, s) = 0 Curv(σ) = 0 σ s = 0 For non-simply-connected manifolds there are topological issues.

IV.- NOETHER CONSERVATION LAW The EP operator EP(l)(σ, s) := div σ δl δσ P+ s takes values in g with ( ) δl P + s (η) = δ s ( ) δl, δ s δl δ s, η P/H along the section s, with (π H ) η = η P/H. The elements η(x) = [s(x), B(x)] G with B : M h satisfies η P/H Im s = 0, so that for these variations the EP equations are Like a conservation law... div σ δl δσ = 0.

Proposition The Noether conservation law d((j 1 s) i j 1 B Θ L) = 0 for the infinitesimal symmetries B, B h, along a critical (local) section s of P M projects to the equation div σ δl = 0, δσ s h where σ = q(j 1 s), s = [s] H and div σ is the covariant divergence operator defined by the connection σ. That is, we have the Euler-Poincaré equation of l evaluated on ker P + s. The conservation law of the H-symmetry is encapsulated in the Euler-Poincaré equations.

For symmetries of the reduced Lagrangian l: We say that a vector field Z X(C M (P/H)) is an infinitesimal symmetry of l if it is of the form Z = (X C, (π H ) X) with X autp, and Z (lv) = 0. Proposition If (σ, s) Γ(C) Γ(P/H) is a solution of the Euler-Poincaré equations + the compatibility conditions and Z = (X C, (π H ) X), X autp, is an infinitesimal symmetry of l, the following conservation holds δl div δσ, η v + X ((l (σ, s))v) = 0, where X is the projection of X onto M and η Γ( g) = gaup is the vertical part of X with respect to the connection σ.

V.- EXAMPLE: MECHANICS Now M = R and P = R G. We have L : R T G R invariant with respect to H G. The Euler-Poincaré identification (time independent) (T G)/H = T R g (G/H) = g (G/H) Whereas the Lagrange-Poincaré identification is (T G)/H T (G/H) h h being the adjoint bundle of G G/H. Hint: Use the identification T (G/H) = G/H m where g h m is a reductive decomposition (through a connection).

For instance, we consider G = SO(3), H = SO(2) and the Lagrangian of the heavy top: L(R, Ṙ) = 1 2 K Ṙ, Ṙ mgre 3 χ In the reduced space g (G/H) = so(3) (SO(3)/SO(2)) we take coordinates Ω : R so(3) = R 3, Ω = R 1 R, Λ : R SO(3)/SO(2) = S 2, Λ = R e 3. The reduced Lagrangian is The operator P + Λ is l(ω, Λ) = 1 IΩ Ω mgλ χ 2 P + Λ : C (R, T S 2 ) C (R, so(3) ) Υ Λ Υ.

The Euler-Poincaré equation is EP(l)(Ω, Λ) = div Ω δl δω P+ Λ ( ) δl δλ = d (IΩ) + Ω IΩ + mgλ χ = 0. dt The compatibility condition CurvΩ = 0 is trivial. The condition Ω Λ = 0 reads dλ dt + Ω Λ = 0. These are the classical equations of the reduced heavy top through semidirect product reduction. Consider T G (G/H) and the Lagrangian Then ˆL is G invariant. L( ) = ˆL(, [e] H ) ˆL(v, [g] H ) = L(g 1 v) (T G (G/H))/G = g (G/H).

Noether of the H = SO(2)-symmetry The (encapsulated) equation applied to kerp + Λ = {λλ} gives equivalent to IΩ Λ d (IΩ) Λ + Ω IΩ Λ = 0 dt (the vertical angular momentum) constant The field X = t is an infinitesimal symmetry of the reduced Lagrangian. The conservation law for l is d dt IΩ Ω+ d ( ) 1 IΩ Ω mgλ χ = d dt 2 dt conservation of the total energy. ( ) 1 IΩ Ω + mgλ χ 2 = 0

VI.- REDUCTION IN AFFINE PRINCIPAL BUNDLES Given a principal bundle P M and a linear action of G on a vector space V we consider and the associated bundle G aff = GSV E = P G V = (P V )/G. The so-called induced affine bundle is P aff = P M E Think of P = LF (M), G = Gl(n; R) and V = R n. Then G aff = Aff(R n ), P aff = AffF (M)

Let L : J 1 P aff R be a Lagrangian invariant with respect to G G aff. The reduced Lagrangian is defined in the reduced space Due to the decomposition (J 1 P aff )/G = C aff P aff /G g aff = g V connections in P aff split in two factor. Then In addition P aff /G = E. C aff = C (T M E) Then with variables l : C (T M E) E R (σ, h; s).

The Euler-Poincaré equation (in ( g aff ) = g E ) are div σ δl δσ + h δl δh δl δ s s = 0 div σ δl δh δl δ s = 0 The compatibility conditions are σ aff s aff = σ s + h = 0, Curvσ aff = (Curvσ, σ h) = (0, 0) which, taking into account that σ σ = Curvσ are equivalent to σ s = h, Curvσ = 0.

VII.- EXAMPLE: MOLECULAR STRANDS We consider P = R 2 SO(3) R 2 and V = R 3. Then E = R 2 R 3 R 2, P aff = R 2 SE(3) R 2, with SE(3) = SO(3)SR 3. Let L : J 1 P aff R invariant with respect to SO(3).

The Euler-Poincaré identification gives a reduced Lagrangian defined in C (T M E) E = (T R 2 so(3)) (T R 2 R 3 ) (R 2 R 3 ) with variables σ = Ωdx + ωdt h = Γdx + γdt s(x, t) = ((x, t), ρ(x, t)) with the coordinates in R 2 are (x, t) and the functions Ω, ω, Γ, γ, ρ : R 2 R 3.

Euler-Poincaré equation takes the form ( x δl δω + Ω δl ) δω + ( t ( x δl δω + ω δl ) + Γ δl δω δγ + γ δl δγ ρ δl δρ = 0, δl δγ + Ω δl ) ( δl + δγ t δγ + ω δl ) δl δγ δρ = 0. The compatibility equations are ρ x + Ω ρ + Γ = 0, ρ t + ω ρ + γ = 0, Ω t ω x + ω Ω = 0.

. THANK YOU VERY MUCH