Using BATSE to Measure. Gamma-Ray Burst Polarization. M. McConnell, D. Forrest, W.T. Vestrand and M. Finger y

Similar documents
Development of a Hard X-Ray Polarimeter for Solar Flares and Gamma-Ray Bursts

Development of a Dedicated Hard X-Ray Polarimeter Mark L. McConnell, James R. Ledoux, John R. Macri, and James M. Ryan

RHESSI Solar Flare Polarimetry

The Angular Distribution of. COMPTEL Gamma-Ray Bursts. R.M. Kippen, J. Ryan, A. Connors, M. McConnell,

GRAPE A Balloon-Borne Gamma-Ray Polarimeter

9.1 Years of All-Sky Hard X-ray Monitoring with BATSE

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 26 Sep 2003

Time evolution of terrestrial gamma ray flashes

1 Gamma-Ray Burst Polarimeter GAP aboard

H. Hofer, C. Lechanoine-Leluc, S. Orsi, M. Pohl, D. Rapin, E.Suarez-Garcia

COMPTEL observations of Cygnus X 1

Science of Compact X-Ray and Gamma-ray Objects: MAXI and GLAST

MeV Quasar Observations with the. COMPTON Gamma Ray Observatory

IN THE PHOTON NUMBER COUNTS OF GAMMA-RAY BURSTS. NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 666, Greenbelt, MD ABSTRACT

Cosmological Gamma-Ray Bursts. Edward Fenimore, NIS-2 Richard Epstein, NIS-2 Cheng Ho, NIS-2 Johannes Intzand, NIS-2

Status and Future Prospects for Υ-Ray Polarimetry

Using Gamma Ray Bursts to Estimate Luminosity Distances. Shanel Deal

astro-ph/ Jun 1994

BATSE Evidence for GRB Spectral Features

Construction and Preliminary Application of the Variability Luminosity Estimator

Precise Interplanetary Network Localization of a New Soft. Gamma Repeater, SGR

First Results of POLAR: A dedicated Gamma-Ray Burst Polarimeter

G.H. Share, W.N. Johnson, J.D. Kurfess, R.J. Murphy. A. Connors. B.L. Dingus, B.E. Schaefer. W. Collmar, V. Schonfelder

Gamma-Ray Burst Studies With the. Energetic X-ray Imaging Survey. Telescope (EXIST)

Millimeter{Interferometer Observations of Flares in. Dept. of Astronomy, Univ. of Maryland, College Park MD 20742

Characteristics of Two Simple Microwave. Abstract. We present simultaneous microwave and X-ray data for two microwave

The Sun and the Solar System in Gamma Rays

GRB Polarimetry with POLAR. Merlin Kole

Princeton University Observatory preprint POP-567. Submitted to Astrophysical Journal Letters, 2 June 1994

RXTE Observations of PKS during the November 1997 Gamma-Ray Outburst

~ _- IDOCLRXKT DMSP SATELLITE DETECTIONS OF GAMMA-RAY BURSTS. J. Terrell, NIS-2 P. Lee, NIS-2 R W.

Polarisation measurements with a CdTe pixel array detector for Laue hard X-ray focusing telescopes

THE MICROWAVE COUNTERPARTS OF. Bartol Research Institute, Univ. of Delaware, Abstract:

The Fermi Zoo : GRB prompt spectra. Michael S. Briggs (Univ. Alabama in Huntsville) for the Fermi GBM & LAT Teams

Gamma-Ray Astronomy. Astro 129: Chapter 1a

The Gamma-ray Albedo of the Moon

High-Energy Spectral Signatures in Gamma-Ray Bursts

Suzaku-WAM soft gamma-ray all-sky monitor by the earth occultation technique

Cosmic Gamma-ray Bursts Studies with Ioffe Institute Konus Experiments

Spectra of a recent bright burst measured by CGRO-COMPTEL: GRB

Detectors for 20 kev 10 MeV

INTRODUCTION. As shown in Figure 1a, the phenomena of lightningmesosphere-ionosphere

hard X-ray outbursts (Harmon et al. 1995). Its distance al. 1995a). 2. Observation viewing periods 336.5, 338, 405.5, 407 and respectively).

Intrinsic and Cosmological Signatures in Gamma-Ray Burst Time Proles: Time Dilation Andrew Lee and Elliott D. Bloom Stanford Linear Accelerator Center

COMPTEL OBSERVATIONS OF CYGNUS X-1. M. McConnell, A. Connors, D. Forrest, J. Ryan Space Science Center, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824

New Constraints on Simultaneous Optical Emission. From GRBs Measured by the LOTIS Experiment

Time Since Burst Trigger (Seconds) TTS Data, Energy Channel 3, kev

The MEGA Project for Medium Energy Gamma-ray Astronomy

Eric Howell University of Western Australia

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 26 Dec 1997

Slides by: Prof. Abeer Alharbi

A search for gamma-ray flares from black-hole candidates on time scales of 1.5 hours

Gamma Ray Burst Polarimeter POLAR

THE 1979, MARCH 5 GAMMA-RAY TRANSIENT: WAS IT A CLASSIC GAMMA-RAY BURST? E. E. Fenimore, R. W. Klebesadel, and J. G. Laros Los Alamos National

Non-thermal emission from pulsars experimental status and prospects

X-ray polarimetry and new prospects in high-energy astrophysics

Do X-Ray Binaries Emit Gamma Rays? P. M. Chadwick, M. R. Dickinson, N. A. Dipper, J. Holder, T. R. Kendall, T. J. L. McComb,

E. Caroli(1), R. M. Curado da Silva(2), J.B. Stephen(1), F. Frontera(1,3), A. Pisa (3), S. Del Sordo (4)

A. Takada (Kyoto Univ.)

ESSENTIAL QUANTUM PHYSICS PETER LANDSHOFF. University of Cambridge ALLEN METHERELL. University of Central Florida GARETH REES. University of Cambridge

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 24 Nov 1998

Position Sensitive Germanium Detectors for the Advanced Compton Telescope

Do Gamma-Ray Burst Sources Repeat?

LAT Automated Science Processing for Gamma-Ray Bursts

Radiation Detection for the Beta- Delayed Alpha and Gamma Decay of 20 Na. Ellen Simmons

(a) Mono-absorber. (b) 4-segmented absorbers. (c) 64-segmented absorbers

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 21 May 1997

MeV emission from the black hole candidate GRO J measured with COMPTEL

Simulation of the charging process of the LISA test masses due to solar particles.

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 28 Nov 1998

arxiv:astro-ph/ v2 17 May 1998

Constraints on terrestrial gamma ray flash production from satellite observation

New Constraints on Simultaneous Optical Emission from Gamma-Ray Bursts Measured by the Livermore Optical Transient Imaging System Experiment

CRaTER Science Requirements

When a Standard Candle Flickers: The Dimming of the Crab Nebula. Gary Case

cosmological GRBs is to use the log N-log P distribution. The large luminosity and distance determined from the time dilation is inconsistent with the

Calibration of the AGILE Gamma Ray Imaging Detector

A very wide field focusing telescope for Synoptic studies in the soft X-ray band

1 Introduction STATUS OF THE GLAST LARGE AREA TELESCOPE. SLAC-PUB December Richard Dubois. Abstract

METIS- ESA Solar Orbiter Mission: internal straylight analysis

Plans for the first balloon flight of the gamma-ray polarimeter experiment (GRAPE)

Kilo-Hertz QPO and X-ray Bursts in 4U in Low Intensity State

The Ulysses Supplement to the GRANAT/WATCH Catalog of. Cosmic Gamma-Ray Bursts

ASCA Observation of the Quiescent X-ray Counterpart to SGR

22.54 Neutron Interactions and Applications (Spring 2004) Chapter 1 (2/3/04) Overview -- Interactions, Distributions, Cross Sections, Applications

The Path From COSI to COSI-X

Office of Nonproliferation and Verification Research and Development University and Industry Technical Interchange (UITI2011) Review Meeting

Milagro A TeV Observatory for Gamma Ray Bursts

Time Dilation of BATSE Gamma-ray Bursts. Center for Space Science and Astrophysics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA ABSTRACT

Tracking and imaging gamma ray experiment (TIGRE) for 1 to 100 MEV gamma ray astronomy

Developing a Compton Polarimeter to Measure Polarization of Hard X-Rays in the kev Energy Range

Complete GLAST 5 x 5 Array of Towers Anticoincidence Shield. One Tower Module of GLAST. 14 Gaps of rad len conv

Comparison of Microwave and Hard X-Ray Spectra from Solar Flares

Chapter 37 Early Quantum Theory and Models of the Atom. Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.

Results from GROCSE I: A Real-time Search for Gamma Ray Burst Optical Counterparts

Comptel gamma ray observations of the quasars CTA 102 and 3C 454.3

COMPTEL detection of the variable radio source GT

The Locations of Gamma-Ray Bursts Measured by Comptel

A model of the Earth's gamma-ray emission for GLAST derived from EGRET data. Dirk Petry (UMBC, NASA/GSFC) DC2 Meeting GSFC June 27-29, 2005

Photoneutron reactions studies at ELI-NP using a direct neutron multiplicity sorting method Dan Filipescu

Transcription:

Using BATSE to Measure Gamma-Ray Burst Polarization M. McConnell, D. Forrest, W.T. Vestrand and M. Finger y University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire 03824 y Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Alabama 35812 We describe a technique for measuring the polarization of hard X- rays from -ray bursts based on the angular distribution of that portion of the ux which is scattered o the top of the Earth's atmosphere. The scattering cross section depends not only on the scatter angle itself, but on the orientation of the scatter angle with respect to the incident polarization vector. Consequently, the distribution of the observed albedo ux will depend on the direction and the polarization properties (i.e., the level of polarization and polarization angle) of the source. Although the BATSE design (with its large eld-of-view for each detector) is not optimized for albedo polarimetry, we have nonetheless investigated the feasibility of this technique using BATSE data. INTRODUCTION One of the fundamental properties of electromagnetic radiation is its polarization. Although this property has been exploited extensively for astrophysical studies at longer wavelengths (e.g., radio, optical and, to some extent, x-ray wavelengths), there have been only limited eorts to measure polarization from cosmic sources at hard X-ray energies (E > 30 kev). Here we investigate how one might use the radiation which is backscattered from the Earth's atmosphere to study source polarization, a technique which we call albedo polarimetry. Based on our Monte Carlo simulations, we have estimated the BATSE sensitivity to hard X-ray polarization in -ray bursts and nd signicant sensitivity to polarization for events whose (50{300 kev) uence is greater than 10?5 ergs cm?2. All studies of -ray bursts to date have involved measurements of the source location, source spectrum and source intensity. Since these data have not yet yielded any fundamental answers as to the nature of the bursts, we contend that an additional piece of information is desirable. The only additional piece of information which is available to the observer is that of the polarization of the burst radiation. Although the published literature on the subject of polarization in bursts is limited (driven, in part, by a lack of observations), there appears to be a general consensus that such measurements would be useful (1,2). In principle, polarization measurements can provide information on both the emission mechanism and on the geometry of the emitting region. c 1996 American Institute of Physics 1

2 X-RAY ALBEDO POLARIMETRY A measurement of the linear polarization of a transient event (such as a -ray burst) can, in principle, be made by measuring the angular distribution of the albedo ux, i.e., the source ux which is scattered from the Earth's atmosphere prior to reaching the detector. This concept is based on the properties of the Compton scattering of polarized radiation. In particular, this approach relies on the fact that, in the case of linearly polarized radiation, the scattered photon tends to be ejected at right angles to the electric eld vector of the incident radiation (3). The atmosphere, as seen from an orbiting satellite, presents a wide range of possible scatter angles for a given source direction. The photon scatter angle will depend on look direction. Hence, the intensity distribution of the albedo ux will exhibit an angular distribution which will depend on the polarization properties of the source radiation. For the case of an orbiting detector observing some cosmic source, the distribution of the scattered albedo ux across the top of the atmosphere will depend on three parameters: 1) the angular height of the source above the Earth's limb (i.e., the source-earth-detector geometry); 2) the level of linear polarization of the source ux; and 3) the orientation of the bulk polarization vector of the source ux. Therefore, if one knows the direction of the source, then the polarization properties can be determined from the study of the albedo ux. We have modeled the scattering process using Monte Carlo simulations, incorporating a version of GEANT which has been modied to handle polarized photons. For an incident E?2 power-law spectrum, the energy distribution of the scattered ux (integrated over 2 steradian) peaks in the 50-100 kev range. For sources near the zenith, the albedo fraction reaches a maximum value of about 40%. An example of the spatial distribution of the scattered ux, based on our simulations, is shown in Figure 1. This gure shows the intensity of the scattered ux across the visible disk of the Earth (which subtends an angle of 70 in low Earth orbit) for the case of a 100% polarized source at a zenith angle of 0. These simulations serve to demonstrate that, in principle, one could study burst polarization by mapping out the observed distribution of the ux which is scattered o the atmosphere. A mapping of this distribution at a resolution of a few degrees would certainly provide sucient detail for such an albedo polarimeter. Unfortunately, we have no way of mapping the albedo ux with such high precision at the present time. However, the BATSE detectors on CGRO (in particular, the Large Area Detectors, or LADs) are capable of providing a crude map of the distribution of the albedo ux. Despite the aliasing eects amongst the detectors, this capability is sucient for measuring polarization parameters both in some of the larger -ray bursts and in some of the larger solar are events (4).

3 FIG. 1. The albedo distribution corresponding to a 100% polarized E?2 spectrum incident from 0 zenith angle. The polarization (E-eld) vector lies along the horizontal plane. The scale is a relative measure of the photon ux from each solid angle element. The asymmetry of the distribution is especially apparent near the Earth's limb. BATSE SENSITIVITY TO BURST POLARIZATION The exact sensitivity of the BATSE to the measurement of burst polarization depends on several factors. These include the following: 1) Source zenith angle. The sensitivity will depend on the contrast amongst the dierent LAD detectors. This depends not only on the contrast within the polarized ux distribution, but also on the contrast (or lack thereof) in the corresponding unpolarized distribution. These eects are such that the sensitivity is near maximum for source zenith angles 30. 2) Aliasing. Due to the large FoV and the geometrical spacing of the LAD detectors, there exist certain geometrical arrangements with respect to the polarization vector where the polarization sensitivity will be limited

4 (and perhaps even go to zero). In more general terms, the polarization sensitivity will vary within the polarization parameter space. 3) Incident source spectrum. Because the scattered albedo photons tend to result from incident photons > 100 kev, a harder incident spectrum will result in more intense albedo ux and, hence, higher sensitivity. This means, for example, that there will be less sensitivity to a (typically softer) solar are than to a (typically harder) -ray burst of comparable uence. 4) Source inensity. For more intense events, various instrumental eects, most notably pulse pile-up and deadtime, become important factors. 5) Flux leakage. We have assumed an LAD angular response which goes to zero at 90. In other words, we assumed that the leakage of ux through the spacecraft can be neglected. (This is known not to be the case for some of the larger events and may even be the limiting factor in the application of this technique to BATSE data.) 6) Background level. The total background level for a given event depends not only on the background rate, but also on the duration of the event. In estimating BATSE sensitivity levels, we consider only the four detectors which face away from the burst and which are exposed only to the albedo ux. We then search for a distribution of events in those detectors which are statistically inconsistent with that expected from an unpolarized event. In practice, this involves a 2 comparison between the event distribution derived from albedo simulations for a polarized and an unpolarized -ray burst at a given zenith angle. The estimated polarization sensitivity levels for a burst at a zenith angle of 30 are shown in Figure 2. These data indicate that signicant sensitivity to polarization can be achieved for bursts with (30-500 kev) uence levels above 10?5 ergs cm?2. In the BATSE 2B catalog, there were more than 50 events above this uence level, suggesting that there may be a signicant number of events which are susceptible to polarization measurements using X-ray albedo polarimetry. BATSE MEASUREMENTS OF BURST POLARIZATION At the present time, we have no rm results (either positive detections or upper limits) for any -ray burst observed by BATSE. The analysis is presently dominated by several systematic eects which preclude any denitive measurements. These eects include: 1) dierences in channel bandwidths amongst the LAD detectors; 2) deadtime eects; 3) leakage of incident ux through the spacecraft; and 4) the need to account for the precise form of the incident spectrum. The ongoing analysis is concentrating on the eort

5 BATSE Polarization Sensitivity : Zenith Angle = 30 degs Reduced χ 2 (4 dof) 9.0 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 ergs cm -2 in 50-300 kev 4e-06 1e-05 2e-05 4e-05 99% C.L. 90% C.L. 1.0 0.0 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 Polarization Fraction FIG. 2. Estimated sensitivity to burst polarization for an event at 30 zenith angle. These data indicate, for example, that a polarization level of 70% can be detected at the 3 level in a burst with a uence level of 10?5. At a uence level of 410?5, the 3 polarization sensitivity level is 15%. to remove these systematics eects. We are also in the process of setting up our simulation database in a form that can be directly used by software tools developed by the BATSE team. This should greatly facilitate the search for burst polarization in the BATSE database. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work is supported at UNH by NASA Grant NAG 5-2388 and by NASA contract NAS 5-26645. REFERENCES 1. Hurley, K., in Gamma-Ray Bursts: Observations, Analyses and Theories, eds. C. Ho, R. Epstein, and E. Fenimore, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992, p. 279. 2. Lund, N., in Gamma-Ray Bursts: Observations, Analyses and Theories, eds. C. Ho, R. Epstein, and E. Fenimore, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992, p. 489. 3. Evans, R.D. The Atomic Nucleus, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co. (1955). 4. McConnell, M., et al., paper presented at the High Energy Solar Physics Workshop, Greenbelt, Md, August 16-18, 1995. To be published in AIP Conf. Proc.