How GNSS CORS in Japan works for geodetic control and disaster mitigations

Similar documents
Case Study of Japan: Crustal deformation monitoring with GNSS and InSAR

Case study of Japan: Reference Frames in Practice

Seismic Activity and Crustal Deformation after the 2011 Off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake

GEODETIC NETWORK OF SAUDI ARABIA AND FIDUCIAL STATIONS. GFN OF Saudi Arabia in Based on ITRF2000 Datum

The impact of the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake on Tsukuba 32-m station

CORS Network and Datum Harmonisation in the Asia-Pacific Region. Richard Stanaway and Craig Roberts

Seismogeodesy for rapid earthquake and tsunami characterization

A. Barbu, J. Laurent-Varin, F. Perosanz, F. Mercier and J. Marty. AVENUE project. June, 20

COMPARISON OF COSEISMIC DISPLACEMENTS OBTAINED FROM STRONG MOTION ACCELEROGRAMS AND GPS DATA IN JAPAN

Crustal deformation by the Southeast-off Kii Peninsula Earthquake

Report for 15th PCGIAP Meeting at 18th UNRCC-AP Working Group 1 Regional Geodesy

Recent GNSS Developments and Reference Frame Issues in Turkey. Onur LENK and Bahadir AKTUĞ

ESTIMATES OF HORIZONTAL DISPLACEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE 1999 TAIWAN EARTHQUAKE

Low-Latency Earthquake Displacement Fields for Tsunami Early Warning and Rapid Response Support

Developments towards GNSS real-time service in GFZ

JMA Tsunami Warning Services. Tomoaki OZAKI Senior Coordinator for Tsunami Forecast Modeling Japan Meteorological Agency

Global Positioning System(GPS) Global Positioning System(GPS) is a new surveying technique applying space technology designed by the United States

Earthquake Source. Kazuki Koketsu. Special Session: Great East Japan (Tohoku) Earthquake. Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo

Reconstruction of Geodetic Reference Frame after the 2011 off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake

Semi-Dynamic Datum of Indonesia

JMA Tsunami Warning Services. Takeshi KOIZUMI Senior Coordinator for International Earthquake and Tsunami Information Japan Meteorological Agency

Geodesy. orientation. shape. gravity field

NGIAs' roles in successful disaster response

Real-Time GNSS Positioning System REGARD for Rapid Earthquake Moment Estimates

Twenty-Year Successful Operation of GEONET

Working Group 1. Geodetic Reference Frame. Activity Report. for. The UN-GGIM-AP Plenary Meeting

Earthquakes and Tsunamis

The March 11, 2011, Tohoku-oki earthquake (Japan): surface displacement and source modelling

SURVEY PORTRAY SAFEGUARD

A Deformation Model to support a Next Generation Australian Geodetic Datum

Geospatial Infrastructure that Helps Keep us Resilient to Natural Disasters - Japan s example

What are the social, technical, environmental and economic benefits and opportunities of accessing and sharing geodetic data?

Development of a Predictive Simulation System for Crustal Activities in and around Japan - II

Operational Aspects of GNSS CORS What is a GNSS CORS system used for?

The great earthquakes that have shaped Japan 日本に大きな影響を与えた地震

Realizing a geodetic reference frame using GNSS in the presence of crustal deformations: The case of Greece

GEORED Project: GNSS Geodesy Network for Geodynamics Research in Colombia, South America. Héctor Mora-Páez

The Impact of the 2010 Darfield (Canterbury) Earthquake on the Geodetic Infrastructure in New Zealand 1

CSRC Director s Report

3.3 Analysis Coordinator

GG S. Internal Vision of GGOS. Markus Rothacher. GFZ Potsdam

Widespread Ground Motion Distribution Caused by Rupture Directivity during the 2015 Gorkha, Nepal Earthquake

Title. Author(s)Heki, Kosuke. CitationScience, 332(6036): Issue Date Doc URL. Type. File Information. A Tale of Two Earthquakes

Next Generation Australian Datum. Permanent Committee on Geodesy, ICSM

Special feature: Are its lessons being adequately applied? Follow-up on the ten-year anniversary of the Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake

GEO-VIII November Geohazard Supersites and Natural Laboratories Progress Report. Document 9

Frequent epoch reference frames instead of instant station positions and constant velocities

中村洋光 Hiromitsu Nakamura 防災科学技術研究所 National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention, Japan (NIED) Outline

Rapid Determination of Earthquake Magnitude using GPS for Tsunami Warning Systems: An Opportunity for IGS to Make a Difference

Frames for the Future New Datum Definitions for Modernization of the U.S. National Spatial Reference System

気象研究所技術報告第 77 号 2017 第 1 章巨大地震の規模等の把握 1.1 様々な早期規模推定手法 本項の論文は, 著者からの転載許可を受けて掲載している (Katsumata, A., S. Aoki, Y. Yoshida, H. Ueno and T. Yokota, 2012: Ra

Update on the International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF) : ITRF2014. Zuheir Altamimi

Reference frames and positioning

History of International Training in Seismology and Earthquake Engineering at IISEE

Deterministic and Non-deterministic Behavior of Earthquakes and Hazard Mitigation Strategy

Sentinel Asia Tsunami Working Group

NGS and the Modernization of the National Spatial Reference System (NSRS)

Real Time Monitoring System for Megathrust Earthquakes and Tsunamis - Cabled Network System and Buoy System in Japan -

NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS FOR TSUNAMI FORECASTING AT PADANG CITY USING OFFSHORE TSUNAMI SENSORS

Determination of Current Velocity Field (Rate) of North Anatolian Fault in Izmit-Sapanca Segment

Case Study 1: 2014 Chiang Rai Sequence

Do we need to update PNG94 to PNG2020?

A Unique Reference Frame: Basis of the Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS) for Geodynamics and Global Change

EPOS-RT: Software for Real-time GNSS Data Processing

Lessons from the 2004 Sumatra earthquake and the Asian tsunami

12/07/2013. Apparent sea level rise and earthquakes

Coseismic slip model

Vertical Reference Frame Pacific

Military Geographic Institute

NTUA, Faculty of Rural and Surveying Engineering, Dionysos Satellite Observatory, Higher Geodesy Laboratory NOA, Institute of Geodynamics 1

Spatio-temporal variation in slip rate on the plate boundary off Sanriku, northeastern Japan, estimated from small repeating earthquakes

FORMAT FOR TECHNICAL PAPERS

Making Sense of Evolving Reference Frames for North America

Trimble RTX TM Orbit Determination and User Positioning Performance with BeiDou Satellites

Lab 9: Satellite Geodesy (35 points)

Disclaimer. This report was compiled by an ADRC visiting researcher (VR) from ADRC member countries.

Coseismic slip distribution of the 1946 Nankai earthquake and aseismic slips caused by the earthquake

AVERAGE AND VARIATION OF FOCAL MECHANISM AROUND TOHOKU SUBDUCTION ZONE

Moment tensor inversion of near source seismograms

This presentation covers the following areas

S. Toda, S. Okada, D. Ishimura, and Y. Niwa International Research Institute of Disaster Science, Tohoku University, Japan

PRELIMINARY STUDY OF GROUND MOTION CHARACTERISTICS IN FURUKAWA DISTRICT, JAPAN, BASED ON VERY DENSE SEISMIC-ARRAY-OBSERVATION

REPORT ON THE TOHOKU AREA PASIFIC OFFSHORE EARTHQUAKE

Positioning the Pacific: NOAA s Geospatial Activities. Juliana Blackwell, Director NOAA s National Geodetic Survey March 6, 2012

Investigation of mechanisms causing ground motion and tsunami due to the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake at Nuclear Power Plant sites

NATRF 2022 AND LDP OCTOBER 11, 2017

Rapid magnitude determination from peak amplitudes at local stations

Sendai Earthquake NE Japan March 11, Some explanatory slides Bob Stern, Dave Scholl, others updated March

The International Terrestrial Reference System and ETRS89: Part I : General concepts

Dealing with significant differential tectonic plate velocities within an RTK-network: The case of HEPOS

Real time Monitoring System for Earthquakes and Tsunamis (DONET)

SIRGAS: Basis for Geosciences, Geodata, and Navigation in Latin America

Case Study 2: 2014 Iquique Sequence

Publ. Astron. Obs. Belgrade No. 91 (2012), REALIZATION OF ETRF2000 AS A NEW TERRESTRIAL REFERENCE FRAME IN REPUBLIC OF SERBIA

An Assessment of the Accuracy of PPP in Remote Areas in Oman

The Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS) of the International Association of Geodesy, IAG

A Prototype of Strong Ground Motion Prediction Procedure for Intraslab Earthquake based on the Characterized Source Model

Differentiating earthquake tsunamis from other sources; how do we tell the difference?

Three Dimensional Simulations of Tsunami Generation and Propagation

The Japanese University Joint Seismic Observations at the Niigaka-Kobe Tectonic Zone

Transcription:

ICG Working Group D Reference Frames, Timing and Applications How GNSS CORS in Japan works for geodetic control and disaster mitigations ICG11, Nov. 7-11, 2016, Sochi, Russia Hiromichi TSUJI Geodetic Observation Center Authority (GSI) of Japan Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Authority of Japan 1

Contents 1. Introduction to GNSS CORS in Japan GNSS Earth Observation Network system (GEONET) 2. How GEONET works for Geodetic control Realization of ITRF in tectonically active regions Disaster mitigations Real-time GNSS analysis system for rapid earthquake fault estimations 2

Introduction to GEONET 3

Positioning with GNSS Car Navigation Land Surveying Satellites Satellites Code Carrier phase Receiver Receiver Point positioning (XYZ) or (Lon, Lat, H) Precision 10 m CORS Receiver (continuously operating reference stations) Relative positioning between 2 receivers Precision 1 cm 4

What is GEONET? One of the Largest Continuously Operating Reference Stations networks 1,300 permanent stations with 20km spacing in Japan Collects GNSS data every seconds, and provides data / products to users Includes 7 IGS stations Infrastructure for surveying and precise positioning in Japan since 1994 5

GEONET Stations (GNSS-based control points) Mt. Fuji North American plate Receiver GNSS antenna IP Router UPS Eurasian plate Batteries 5-m high stainless pillar Tilt meter Heater Arrester Philippine Sea plate Pacific plate Model 93 1993 Model 94 1994 Model 95 1995-1997 Model 02 2002- Okino Tori island Minami Tori island 6

GEONET data / outcomes GNSS Satellites GPS QZSS GNSS-based control points GLONASS Galileo 20 km spacing Operated 24/7 Transferring real-time 1 Hz observation data Analysis Center in Tsukuba Data Collection Data Analysis Observed data (every 30 sec) Analyzed data (coordinates) Real-time data Provided to the Industry Other data Survey & Mapping Data open to the public via web page, free of charge, with official site coordinates Crustal deformation Monitor Monitoring of Earthquakes and Volcanic activities (new) Tsunami early warning Precise real-time positioning ICT construction precision farming Source of QZSS augmentation Applications Weather forecast using watervapor info from GNSS Ionosphere studies 7

How GEONET works for geodetic control - Realization of ITRF in tectonically active regions 8

Seismicity map of the world Earthquakes > M5.0 in 1977-2014 Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo, http://www.eri.u-tokyo.ac.jp 9

Crustal deformation observed by GEONET since April 1997 North American plate Eurasian plate Fixed point Pacific plate Philippine Sea plate 10

Tohoku EQ (M9.0) March 11, 2011 11

Coseismic deformation field observed by GEONET with 1Hz 14:46, March 11, 2011 15:15, March 11, 2011 Main shock M9.0 Largest after shock M7.7 Post processed 1 Hz PPP kinematic solutions with GIPSY 6.1 (Nishimura, 2011) www.gsi.go.jp/cais/chikakuhendo40010.html Vectors whose error exceeds 0.1m are not plotted. 12

Site Coordinates of GEONET 0 30 0 6/1 10/1 5/1 4/1 ( ) = c + a ln 1+ t τ log y t 地震からの経過日数 Days after the mainchock 250 Japanese Geodetic Datum (JGD) 2000 Official coordinates for surveyors in Japan Static datum: Realization of ITRF94 with the epoch 1997.0 Obsolete in east Japan after 2011 Tohoku EQ Should be updated using VLBI and GEONET results The timing was decided by the predicted postseismic deformation. 13

Update of official site coordinates (JGD2011) Difference between JGD2000 and JGD2011 New official coordinates of GEONET form JGD2011 (ITRF2008) with the epoch May 24, 2011 for eastern Japan Accelerated infrastructure reconstruction in Tohoku area. This quick response was achieved by the continuous observation of GEONET. Although JGD2011 is a static datum whose epoch is fixed, we also provide daily site coordinates aligned with ITRF and semi-dynamic correction parameters. 14

How GEONET works for disaster mitigations - Real-time GNSS analysis system for rapid earthquake fault estimations (REGARD) The following slides are prepared by Mr. Satoshi Kawamoto, GSI. Development of REGARD is the joint effort with Tohoku University. 15

Motivation: improvement of tsunami warning in Japan Tsunami Warning after the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake (Mw 9.0) 3 minutes 12 hours Observed Early Earthquake Warning: 30 sec. Tsunami Warning: 3 min. (Ozaki, 2011) Initial magnitude (EEW) was Saturated at M7.9 Underestimating tsunami heights How to prevent saturations? 16

Kinematic GNSS analysis Provides: Displacement wave-form Mw free from the saturation problems Rupture length and width Size of a potential subsequent tsunami (www.gsi.go.jp/cais/chikakuhendo40010.html) 17

GEONET real-time analysis system(regard) Geonet stations GEONET real-time analysis system: Calculates 1Hz displacement Detects earthquake event Automated fault model inversion GOAL: Provides Mw < 3minutes 18

Flow diagram of REGARD DATA GEONET stations Real-time 1Hz BINEX IGS Ultra-Rapid orbit JMA RTCM convert RTCM 1. Real-time Positioning subsystem RTKLIB 2.4.1 (Takasu, 2011) Low-pass filter (20s moving average) 2. Event detection subsystem - RAPiD(Ohta et al., 2012) Station position time-series LTA-STA > 0.03m - Early Earthquake Warning EEW > M7.0 Early Earthquake Warning (option) 3. Fault model inversion subsystem Automatic estimation of finite fault model 19

2003 Tokachi-oki Earthquake (Mw 8.0) Mw estimates Stable magnitudes were derived within 100 sec by both modeling routines 20

2011 Tohoku Earthquake (Mw 9.0) Mw estimates Stable after 120 seconds No saturation occurred for magnitude estimates using GPS real-time positionings 21

2016 Kumamoto EQ (M7.3) Horizontal Crustal deformation from REGARD Observed significant horizontal displacements of up to 1 m 22

Real-time earthquake fault estimates at Kumamoto EQ T=58s Mw 6.85 T=100s Mw 6.84 T=116s Mw 6.81 T=290s Mw 6.96 23

The fault model (final) Kumamoto EQ Earthquake fault with right-lateral slip along the Futagawa fault segment 24

Conclusions GSI has been operating GEONET in Japan for the past two decades to establish a regional reference frame consistent with the ITRF, and to monitor crustal deformations for disaster mitigations. GNSS is a great tool for society! Geodetic reference frame (i.e. ITRF) is necessary to connect GNSS and society. 25