Experimental Aerodynamics. Experimental Aerodynamics

Similar documents
Drag (2) Induced Drag Friction Drag Form Drag Wave Drag

MDTS 5705 : Aerodynamics & Propulsion Lecture 2 : Missile lift and drag. G. Leng, MDTS, NUS

Given a stream function for a cylinder in a uniform flow with circulation: a) Sketch the flow pattern in terms of streamlines.

AE 451 Aeronautical Engineering Design I Aerodynamics. Prof. Dr. Serkan Özgen Dept. Aerospace Engineering December 2017

AE 451 Aeronautical Engineering Design I Aerodynamics. Prof. Dr. Serkan Özgen Dept. Aerospace Engineering December 2015

Lecture-4. Flow Past Immersed Bodies

Bluff Body, Viscous Flow Characteristics ( Immersed Bodies)

Given the water behaves as shown above, which direction will the cylinder rotate?

Lecture 7 Boundary Layer

Relaminerization of a Highly Accelerated Flow on a Convex Curvature

Department of Mechanical Engineering

Experimental Aerodynamics. Experimental Aerodynamics

Wings and Bodies in Compressible Flows

/ m U) β - r dr/dt=(n β / C) β+ (N r /C) r [8+8] (c) Effective angle of attack. [4+6+6]

APPENDIX C DRAG POLAR, STABILITY DERIVATIVES AND CHARACTERISTIC ROOTS OF A JET AIRPLANE (Lectures 37 to 40)

Compressible Potential Flow: The Full Potential Equation. Copyright 2009 Narayanan Komerath

External Flow and Boundary Layer Concepts

Syllabus for AE3610, Aerodynamics I

BOUNDARY LAYER FLOWS HINCHEY

Masters in Mechanical Engineering. Problems of incompressible viscous flow. 2µ dx y(y h)+ U h y 0 < y < h,

Part 3. Stability and Transition

The polar for uncambered and cambered airfoils. The angel of attack α

Tutorial 10. Boundary layer theory

Brenda M. Kulfan, John E. Bussoletti, and Craig L. Hilmes Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, Seattle, Washington, 98124

Definitions. Temperature: Property of the atmosphere (τ). Function of altitude. Pressure: Property of the atmosphere (p). Function of altitude.

ESDU Catalogue Validated Engineering Design Methods

INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING (Autonomous) Dundigal, Hyderabad

= 390 ( R). Then, for a given edge Mach number, M e., and ratio of wall temperature to adiabatic wall temperature T W = T W. T AW = T e 2 M e 2

Masters in Mechanical Engineering Aerodynamics 1 st Semester 2015/16

Fluid Mechanics II 3 credit hour. External flows. Course teacher Dr. M. Mahbubur Razzaque Professor Department of Mechanical Engineering BUET 1

Aerodynamics. Lecture 1: Introduction - Equations of Motion G. Dimitriadis

RECENT near-sonic and low-sonic boom transport aircraft

Laminar Flow. Chapter ZERO PRESSURE GRADIENT

High Pressure Zone Capture Wing Configuration for High Speed Air Vehicles

Flight Dynamics and Control. Lecture 3: Longitudinal stability Derivatives G. Dimitriadis University of Liege

MDTS 5734 : Aerodynamics & Propulsion Lecture 1 : Characteristics of high speed flight. G. Leng, MDTS, NUS

Experimental Study - Flow Characteristics of Dimpled Wing

Introduction to Aerospace Engineering

NUMERICAL OPTIMIZATION OF THE SHAPE OF A HOLLOW PROJECTILE

EFFECT OF BODY SHAPE ON THE AERODYNAMICS OF PROJECTILES AT SUPERSONIC SPEEDS

58:160 Intermediate Fluid Mechanics Bluff Body Professor Fred Stern Fall 2014

To highlight the change in drag with lift: Drag = Zero-Lift Drag + Lift-Dependent Drag + Compressibility Drag

Separation in three-dimensional steady flow. Part 3: TOPOLOGY OF SOME REMARKABLE THREE-DIMENSIONAL FLOWS

CLARIFICATION OF UNSTEADY CHARACTERISTICS IN SEPARATED FLOW OVER AN AXISYMMETRIC PARABOLOID AT HIGH ANGLES OF ATTACK

COURSE ON VEHICLE AERODYNAMICS Prof. Tamás Lajos University of Rome La Sapienza 1999

Introduction to Aeronautics

Fundamentals of Aerodynamits

Stability and Control Some Characteristics of Lifting Surfaces, and Pitch-Moments

Transition Modeling Activities at AS-C²A²S²E (DLR)

What is the crack propagation rate for 7075-T6 aluminium alloy.

Asymmetry Features Independent of Roll Angle for Slender Circular Cone

The Importance of drag

Applied Fluid Mechanics

Lab Reports Due on Monday, 11/24/2014

Investigation on Boundary Layer Ingestion Propulsion for UAVs

SPC Aerodynamics Course Assignment Due Date Monday 28 May 2018 at 11:30

Numerical Investigation of the Fluid Flow around and Past a Circular Cylinder by Ansys Simulation

UNIT 4 FORCES ON IMMERSED BODIES. Lecture-01

Thin airfoil theory. Chapter Compressible potential flow The full potential equation

Introduction to Aerospace Engineering

Shafts: Torsion of Circular Shafts Reading: Crandall, Dahl and Lardner 6.2, 6.3

PART 1B EXPERIMENTAL ENGINEERING. SUBJECT: FLUID MECHANICS & HEAT TRANSFER LOCATION: HYDRAULICS LAB (Gnd Floor Inglis Bldg) BOUNDARY LAYERS AND DRAG

ν δ - 1 -

Numerical Investigation of Wind Tunnel Wall Effects on a Supersonic Finned Missile

Experimental Investigation of Convoluted Contouring for Aircraft Afterbody Drag Reduction

An Investigation of the Attainable Efficiency of Flight at Mach One or Just Beyond

Consider a wing of finite span with an elliptic circulation distribution:

Friction Factors and Drag Coefficients

and K becoming functions of Mach number i.e.: (3.49)

FLIGHT-DETERMINED SUBSONIC LIFT AND DRAG CHARACTERISTICS OF SEVEN LIFTING-BODY AND WING-BODY REENTRY VEHICLE CONFIGURATIONS WITH TRUNCATED BASES

Full-Scale Wind Tunnel Study of the Seaglider Underwater Glider

In Chapter 6 we considered the general and theoretical aspects of forced

BLUFF-BODY AERODYNAMICS

PROPELLER SLIPSTREAM INVESTIGATION USING THE FOKKER F27 WIND TUNNEL MODEL WITH FLAPS DEFLECTED

DAY 19: Boundary Layer

Technology Applications of the Low Drag Shapes of Aquatic Animals

Wind tunnel test on mean wind forces and peak pressures acting on wind turbine nacelles

Egon Krause. Fluid Mechanics

CHAPTER 3 ANALYSIS OF NACA 4 SERIES AIRFOILS

Introduction to Flight

Fundamentals of Aerodynamics

Configuration Aerodynamics

344 JAXA Special Publication JAXA-SP E 2. Prediction by the CFD Approach 2.1 Numerical Procedure The plane shape of the thin delta wing of the r

A COUPLED-ADJOINT METHOD FOR HIGH-FIDELITY AERO-STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION

Airfoils and Wings. Eugene M. Cliff

Aerodynamic Characteristics of Two Waverider-Derived Hypersonic Cruise Configurations

Flight Vehicle Terminology

Installed Performance Assessment of a Boundary Layer Ingesting Distributed Propulsion System at Design Point

Performance. 5. More Aerodynamic Considerations

Experimental study of Bias Acoustic Liner on nacelle lip-skin

Unsteady Volumetric Entropy Generation Rate in Laminar Boundary Layers

An Investigation of the Attainable Efficiency of Flight at Mach One or Just Beyond

Mathematical Modeling of the Flow behind Propeller

Fundamental Concepts of Convection : Flow and Thermal Considerations. Chapter Six and Appendix D Sections 6.1 through 6.8 and D.1 through D.

STABILITY ANALYSIS MODULE

ACD2503 Aircraft Aerodynamics

AE 2020: Low Speed Aerodynamics. I. Introductory Remarks Read chapter 1 of Fundamentals of Aerodynamics by John D. Anderson

Reynolds number influence on high agility aircraft vortical flows

Semi-Empirical Prediction of Aircraft Low-Speed Aerodynamic Characteristics. Erik D. Olson. NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 23681

AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERIZATION OF A CANARD GUIDED ARTILLERY PROJECTILE

Transcription:

Lecture 6: Slender Body Aerodynamics G. Dimitriadis

Slender bodies! Wings are only one of the types of body that can be tested in a wind tunnel.! Although wings play a crucial role in aeronautical applications (as well as some non-aeronautical applications), other bodies play equally crucial roles.! One example is slender bodies:! Fuselages! Engine nacelles! External stores! Such bodies are generally not designed to produce lift although they can do! Their main aerodynamic contribution is drag.

Slender body examples Engine nacelle Nacelle with tail boom External stores

Non-aeronautical slender bodies Street luminaires Anemometers Wind turbine nacelles

Drag of slender bodies! There are no simple but accurate methods for estimating the aerodynamic forces acting on slender bodies.! Slender bodies are usually designed for operation at minimum drag and zero lift.! The main consideration then, is the estimation of the drag of such bodies.! Nevertheless, they can generate significant amounts of lift in off-design conditions.

Drag estimation! The best approach for estimating the drag of slender bodies is to carry out wind tunnel experiments! There are some simple methods that can be used in the design stage. However, these can prove to be highly inaccurate.! Such methods are usually applied in the conceptual design stage for aircraft. The method described here comes form Torenbeek.

Drag breakdown! As usual, there are many sources of drag:! Skin friction! Profile! Induced! Interference! Compressibility! In this case, we will assume that the main drag sources are skin friction and profile.! Furthermore, it will be assumed that the flow is mostly attached, therefore the profile drag is lower than the skin friction drag.! Interference and compressibility will be ignored

Nomenclature! Slender body dimensions Front view Side view h! b! l: length b: width h: height l!

Flat plate analogy! The drag of fuselages, tail booms and other slender bodies can be estimated using the flat plate analogy! The skin friction drag of the body is approximated by that of a flat plate with the same wetted area! The flow regime (laminar or turbulent) over the flat plate must be representative of the real flow.! A shape correction is applied in order to model the profile drag. This shape correction compares the shape of the body to that of a cylindrical cigar.

Flat plate analogy (2)! The profile drag of the body is then given by C D S = C F ( 1+!)S wet (1)! Where C D is the drag coefficient, S is a reference area, S wet is the body s wetted area and " is the shape correction factor. D! Notice that C D S = 1/ 2!V! 2

Skin Friction Coefficient for flat plate Skin friction coefficient as function of Reynolds number for different flow regimes

Skin friction flat plate solution! For laminar flow, the skin friction coefficient of a flat plate is given by C F = 1.328 (2a)! Where Re is the Reynolds number based on the length of the slender body.! For turbulent flow, it can be approximated as! Or, more simply, as C F = Re 0.455 ( ) 2.58 log Re C F = 0.074 Re 0.2 (2b) (2c)

Laminar and fully turbulent Comparison of C F values for laminar and fully turbulent flows, using the two approximations

Remarks! If the flow is not fully turbulent, it will start off as laminar and undergo turbulent transition over the plate. Then the skin friction coefficient will depend on the location of the transition point.! For high Re it is simpler to assume that the flow is fully turbulent. For lower Re values, both the laminar and turbulent drag can be calculated. Then the actual drag will lie between these two values.! The skin friction coefficient will also be affected by compressibility effects.! Assume that the flow is incompressible.

Slenderness ratio! Forebody and afterbody:! Slenderness ratio:!eff = A c =cross-sectional area! # # # " # # # $ l 4! A c l N + l A 4! A c + 2 whichever is less (3)

Shape factor! Then the shape factor for bodies with pointed tail sections is given by! = 2.2 " eff + 3.8 1.5 3! with the condition that " eff (4) l A 4! A c! 2! Then, the profile drag of the body is obtained from equation 1 using equations 2-4.

Shape factor values The shape factor usually takes values between 0 and 0.5. The curves shown in this figure assume an axisymmetric shape. Swept up tail section increase the drag.

Blunt afterbodies! For bodies with blunt or short afterbodies, calculate the basic drag from equation 1 using! # # #! eff = " # # # $ l N + l C 4 " A c 4 + + 2 l N 4 " A c whichever is less

Blunt afterbody correction! Then, the total drag is the basic drag plus a correction, i.e. C D S = C F ( 1+!)S wet + C Db! Where ( ) ref = 0.015 C Db ( ) ref! And!C DA / C Db figure overleaf!c ( ) DA A ref ( ) C ref C F C Db 4! A C l N + l C ( ) can be read from the

Afterbody drag correction This figure was obtained using statistical data on slender bodies of different shapes. Where D f =b!

Slender body at an angle of attack Fuselage at an angle of attack.

Crossflow correction! If the angle of attack of the slender body is not zero, there is an additional drag contribution due to this crossflow, given by! C D S l # ( ) b c dc ( ) = sin 3! f " " 0 cos! dx! Where c dc =1 for a cylindrical cross-section and c dc =1.5-2 for a rectangular crosssection with rounded edges.! The integral is usually calculated numerically.

Axisymmetric slender bodies! For axisymmetric slender bodies, there exists a potential flow solution, as described by Katz and Plotkin.! This solution can yield the values of the lift, drag and sideforce, given potential flow assumptions.! This means that skin friction and separation are ignored.

Potential flow solution! The three forces acting on the body are given by l 2! F x = " " R! ( x)r( x) p( x," )d!dx 0 0 l 2" F y = #" " R( x) p( x,! )cos!d!dx 0 l 0 2" F z = #" " R x 0 0 ( ) p x,! ( )sin!d!dx! Where F x is the drag, F y the sideforce and F z the lift.! R is the local radius of the body at x and R is its first derivative.

Pressure distribution! The pressure distribution on the surface of the body is given by! And the pressure coefficient is given by! With C p ( x,! ) =! 2q xa p( x,! ) = 1 2!V 2! C p ( x," ) + p!! R# V " ( ) 2! 4! f # R sin! + " f 2 ( ) ( 1! 4cos! ) q xa = V! 2! S"" ( x )ln R 2 + V! """ 4! # S x ln x $ x 0 0 dx 0! S is the cross-sectional area of the body, as a function of x. l 0

Practical session! You are given a fuselage to test in the wind tunnel.! Take measurements of your fuselage! Install the fuselage in the wind tunnel s aerodynamic balance and carry out tests to measure its drag, lift and sideforce under the following conditions:! 0-10 degrees angle of attack! 0-10 degrees angle of yaw! Repeat the tests after re-installing the fuselage back to front (the front becomes the rear)! Calculate theoretical estimates for the drag and compare with your measurements.