Potential Magnetic Field Extrapolation in Binary Star Systems

Similar documents
Joint Magnetospheres of Star-planet Systems

The X-ray Corona of AB Dor

Magnetic mapping of solar-type stars

Rotation and activity in low-mass stars

The Sun Our Star. Properties Interior Atmosphere Photosphere Chromosphere Corona Magnetism Sunspots Solar Cycles Active Sun

The Long and the Short of it: Timescales for Stellar Activity

The Sun. Nearest Star Contains most of the mass of the solar system Source of heat and illumination

Star Formation and Protostars

Stellar coronae and the Sun

Zeeman Doppler Imaging of a Cool Star Using Line Profiles in All Four Stokes Parameters for the First Time

North-South Offset of Heliospheric Current Sheet and its Causes

Magnetic fields in T Tauri stars

B.V. Gudiksen. 1. Introduction. Mem. S.A.It. Vol. 75, 282 c SAIt 2007 Memorie della

Chapter 14 Lecture. Chapter 14: Our Star Pearson Education, Inc.

9-1 The Sun s energy is generated by thermonuclear reactions in its core The Sun s luminosity is the amount of energy emitted each second and is

Chapter 14 Lecture. The Cosmic Perspective Seventh Edition. Our Star Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 14 Our Star Pearson Education, Inc.

Exoplanetary Atmospheres: Atmospheric Dynamics of Irradiated Planets. PHY 688, Lecture 24 Mar 23, 2009

other Galactic science Jane Greaves St Andrews

Dr G. I. Ogilvie Lent Term 2005 INTRODUCTION

The Sun. The Sun Is Just a Normal Star 11/5/2018. Phys1411 Introductory Astronomy. Topics. Star Party

Observable consequences

Chapter 14 Our Star A Closer Look at the Sun. Why was the Sun s energy source a major mystery?

Radio Probes of Extrasolar Space Weather

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ep] 16 Feb 2012

Classical T Tauri stars: magnetic fields, coronae, and star-disc interactions

1-4-1A. Sun Structure

Flaring Stars and the Long Wavelength Array

10/17/ A Closer Look at the Sun. Chapter 11: Our Star. Why does the Sun shine? Lecture Outline

Examination paper for FY2450 Astrophysics

MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Direct imaging of extra-solar planets

Doppler Imaging & Doppler Tomography. Ilian Iliev Institute of Astronomy & Rozhen NAO

Lynx and Exoplanet Science. Rachel Osten, STScI & JHU

AST-1002 Section 0459 Review for Final Exam Please do not forget about doing the evaluation!

Classical T Tauri stars: magnetic fields, coronae and star disc interactions

Magnetometry of M dwarfs: methodology & results

Types of Stars 1/31/14 O B A F G K M. 8-6 Luminosity. 8-7 Stellar Temperatures

Stellar Winds. Star. v w

Guidepost. Chapter 08 The Sun 10/12/2015. General Properties. The Photosphere. Granulation. Energy Transport in the Photosphere.

Examination paper for FY2450 Astrophysics

The Magnetic Sun. CESAR s Booklet

The effect of stellar activity on radial velocities. Raphaëlle D. Haywood Sagan Fellow, Harvard College Observatory

1. Solar Atmosphere Surface Features and Magnetic Fields

The Hertzprung-Russell Diagram. The Hertzprung-Russell Diagram. Question

Stellar Astronomy Sample Questions for Exam 3

COOLNEW S A RESEARCH NEWSLETTER DEDICATED TO COOL STARS AND THE SUN

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.sr] 20 Jun 2014

10/18/ A Closer Look at the Sun. Chapter 11: Our Star. Why does the Sun shine? Lecture Outline

Review III. ASTR 371, Fall Jovian Planets and Rings (Lecture Notes 9; Chap 12, 14)

The point in an orbit around the Sun at which an object is at its greatest distance from the Sun (Opposite of perihelion).

! The Sun as a star! Structure of the Sun! The Solar Cycle! Solar Activity! Solar Wind! Observing the Sun. The Sun & Solar Activity

Revision: Sun, Stars (and Planets) See web slides of Dr Clements for Planets revision. Juliet Pickering Office: Huxley 706

AASTCS 5: Radio Exploration of Planetary Habitability 7 12 May, 2017

The Sun as Our Star. Properties of the Sun. Solar Composition. Last class we talked about how the Sun compares to other stars in the sky

Predicting the Extreme-UV and Lyman-α Fluxes Received by Exoplanets from their Host Stars

Physics 343 Lecture # 5: Sun, Stars, and Planets; Bayesian analysis

HII regions. Massive (hot) stars produce large numbers of ionizing photons (energy above 13.6 ev) which ionize hydrogen in the vicinity.

The stability of planets in the Alpha Centauri system

Black Holes in Hibernation

The Sun s Dynamic Atmosphere

AASTCS 5: Radio Exploration of Planetary Habitability 7 12 May, 2017

The magnetic properties of Am stars

Tutorial: The magnetic Connection between the Sun and the Heliosphere. Karel Schrijver

Problem set: solar irradiance and solar wind

Exoplanetary Atmospheres: Temperature Structure of Irradiated Planets. PHY 688, Lecture 23 Mar 20, 2009

Thermal pressure vs. magnetic pressure

Gregg Hallinan National Radio Astronomy Observatory & UC Berkeley

IX. Dwarf Planets A. A planet is defined to be an object that is large enough to coalesce into a sphere and to have cleared its orbit of other

Solar Structure. Connections between the solar interior and solar activity. Deep roots of solar activity

Large scale properties of coronal heating along the solar cycle

Stellar magnetic fields of young sun-like stars. Aline Vidotto Swiss National Science Foundation Ambizione Fellow University of Geneva

Stars, Galaxies & the Universe Announcements. Stars, Galaxies & the Universe Observing Highlights. Stars, Galaxies & the Universe Lecture Outline

2. The distance between the Sun and the next closest star, Proxima Centuari, is MOST accurately measured in

Physics 343 Lecture # 5: Sun, stars, and planets; (more) statistics

Earth s Magnetic Field

Chapter 10 Our Star. X-ray. visible

McMath-Pierce Adaptive Optics Overview. Christoph Keller National Solar Observatory, Tucson

Radiation from planets

Mechanical equilibrium of hot, large-scale magnetic loops on T Tauri stars

Useful Formulas and Values

Mar 22, INSTRUCTIONS: First ll in your name and social security number (both by printing

Chapter 6: Quantum Theory of the Hydrogen Atom

Internal structure and atmospheres of planets

Tidal effects and periastron events in binary stars

Exam# 1 Review Gator 1 Keep the first page of the exam. Scores will be published using the exam number Chapter 0 Charting the Heavens

Astronomy 113. Dr. Joseph E. Pesce, Ph.D. Dr. Joseph E. Pesce, Ph.D.

Science Olympiad Astronomy C Division Event National Exam

Astronomy Practice Test

Monitoring nearly 4000 nearby stellar systems with the OVRO-LWA in search of radio exoplanets

Our sole source of light and heat in the solar system. A very common star: a glowing g ball of gas held together by its own gravity and powered

Stars : activity imaging magnetic fields Stars : individual : HD

Radiation conditions near exoplanets оf G- M stars Alexei Struminsky, Andrei Sadovski

Mira variables They have very regular light curves, with amplitude V > 2.5 m, and periods Π > 100 days.

Fundamental Astronomy

ASTR 200 : Lecture 21. Stellar mass Black Holes

A Comparative Study of Different Approaches and Potential Improvement to Modeling the Solar Wind

Jupiter: Giant of the Solar System

Introduction The Role of Astronomy p. 3 Astronomical Objects of Research p. 4 The Scale of the Universe p. 7 Spherical Astronomy Spherical

High-energy radiation from outer stellar atmospheres

Transcription:

Potential Magnetic Field Extrapolation in Binary Star Systems Volkmar Holzwarth 1, Scott G. Gregory 2 1 Kiepenheuer-Institut für Sonnenphysik, Schöneckstr.6, 79104 Freiburg, Germany 2 School of Physics & Astronomy, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9SS, UK Abstract. For several decades the potential field source surface(pfss) approximation has proven helpful in the description of the large-scale coronal magnetic fields of the Sun and of cool single stars. Here, we extend the PFSS technique to systems with two objects, to investigate the magnetic field structure of close binary stars. We describe the deviation of the two-centre extrapolation technique and demonstrate its applicability in the case of the close pre-main sequence binary system V4046 Sgr. Our results reveal a joint magnetosphere with complex field structures connecting both stellar components. The binary extrapolation method is also applicabe to the case of magnetic interaction between a host star and a close-in hot Jupiter. 1. Introduction Magnetic fields have a decisive influence on the structural, dynamical and thermal properties of the coronae of cool stars. Since even in the case of the Sun direct observations of coronal magnetic fields are difficult to accomplish, extrapolation methods are frequently used to infer them from magnetic field distributions observed in the photosphere. Introduced by Schatten et al. (1969) for the case of the Sun, the potential field source surface (PFSS) extrapolation technique has since been used numerous times to describe the magnetospheres and wind zones of cool stars. It accounts for the existence of stellar winds through the assumption of magnetic fields becoming purely radial at some distance above the photosphere. Albeit more sophisticated extrapolation methods have been developed since (e.g., Wiegelmann & Sakurai 2012, and references therein), the PFSS approach remains significant, since the resulting magnetic field represents the stable, lowest-energy state of the magnetosphere which is consistent with boundary conditions given in the photosphere. We extend the PFSS technique to close binary stars and demonstrate the applicability of the new method with the case of the close PMS binary V4046 Sgr, for which magnetic

510 Potential Magnetic Field Extrapolation in Binary Star Systems Figure.1: Schematic binary system. The region of interest (grey) is bounded at the outside by the source surface (dotted line) and inside by the stellar surfaces. surface maps for both stellar components have been reconstructed based on Zeeman-Doppler imaging observations (Donati et al. 2011). Our extrapolation method is applicable also to star-planet and planet-moon systems, and easily expandable to N-body systems. 2. Binary field extrapolation technique We consider a binary system consisting of a primary star, S 1, with radius a 1 located (with respect to the center of mass, CM) at point r 1 and a secondary star, S 2 with radius a 2 at point r 2. The source surface S 0, with radius a 0 and centred in CM, marks the location at which the magnetic field becomes purely radial through the effect of winds from both stellar components. In the case of the Sun, a standard value is a 0 = 2.5R (e.g. Schatten et al. 1969), whereas for single stars the position of the source surface is empirically determined through, for example, through a comparison of reconstructed emission measures with empirical values based on X-ray observations (Jardine et al. 2002). The region of interest, shaded grey in Fig..1, is taken to be current free. The magnetic field, B = Ψ, is therefore given by the gradient of a scalar potential function, Ψ, which, owing to the solenoidal condition B = 0, satisfies the Laplace equation, 2 Ψ = 0. The joint magnetesphere of the binary system is thus determined by solving the Laplace equation, subject to boundary conditions specified on the surfaces of both stellar components and on the source surface. The potential Ψ is expanded in terms of regular and irregular solid spherical harmonics (SSH), r l Rl m ( r) = ( 1) m (l+m)! Pm l (cosθ)e imφ (1) Sl m ( r) = ( 1) m(l m)! P m r l+1 l (cosθ)e imφ, (2)

V. Holzwarth & S.G. Gregory 511 respectively (Steinborn & Ruedenberg 1973), around the origins r k of the spheres S k, where we take into account that r = r k + r k (see Fig..1): Ψ( r) = l,m c (0) lm Rm l ( r 0 )+ l,m,k>0 c (k) lm Sm l ( r k ) (3) ThesecondtermontherighthandsideofEq.(3)comprisesthemagneticmomentsofthetwo stellar components, whereas the the first term contains the magnetic moments arising from the boundary condition at the source surface; in mathematical terms, the later is realised through the assumption of mirror sources located beyond the source surface, which in concert with the magnetic moments of the two stars result in a radial magnetic field at S 0. The boundary conditions at S 1,S 2, and S 0 specify expansion coefficients, c (k) lm. For their determination, we make use of SSH translation theorems (e.g. Steinborn & Ruedenberg 1973), R m l ( r 1 + r 2 ) = λ,µ S m l ( r > + r < ) = λ,µ S m l ( r > + r < ) = λ,µ (R R) µm ( r 1 )R µ λ ( r 2) = R m µ l λ ( r 1)R µ λ ( r 2) (4) λ,µ (S R) µm ( r > )R µ λ ( r <) = ( 1) λ µ S m µ l+λ ( r >)R µ λ ( r <) (5) λ,µ (S S) µm ( r < )S µ λ ( r >) = ( 1) λ+µ l m R m µ λ l ( r < )S µ λ ( r >), (6) λ,µ which describe the contribution of a magnetic moment (l, m) of an expansion to the magnetic moment (λ,µ) of a translated expansion shifted by translation vector r 1. Note that in the case of irregular SSH, one has to distinguish between regions which are closer, Eq.(5), and further, Eq.(6), away from the shifted centre of expansion than the applied translation vector, that is r < < r >. The contributions of the stellar magnetic moments to the expansion of the potential function on the source surface are described through Eq.(6), that is Ψ( r 0 ) S0 = l,m = l,m c (0) lm Rm l ( r 0 )+ l,m,k>0 c (0) lm Rm l ( r 0 )+ l,m,k>0 c (k) lm Sm l ( r 0 r k + r 0 ) (7) c (k) lm λ,µ (S S) µm ( r k0)s µ λ ( r 0) (8) with r k0 = r 0 r k. The boundary condition of magnetic fields being purely radial implies Ψ( r 0 ) S0 = const.forthesakeofsimplicity, wesetψ( r 0 ) S0 = 0, whichyieldsthedetermining equations for the coefficients c (0) lm = 1 a 2l+1 0 l,m,k>0 (S S) mm ll in terms of the stellar magnetic moments c (k) l m,k > 0. ( r k0)c (k) l m (9)

512 Potential Magnetic Field Extrapolation in Binary Star Systems Inserting Eq.(9) and Eqs.(4-5) in Eq.(3) yields the expansion of the potenial on the surface S j of stellar component j: Ψ( r j ) Sj = l,m c (j) lm Sm l ( r j )+ λ,µ,j k>0 c (jk) λµ Rµ λ ( r j) (10) Whereas the first term on the right side of Eq.(10) accounts for the contributions of the magnetic moments of star j, the second term, with the new coefficients c (jk) λµ = l,m c (j) l m W µm ( r 0j, r j0,a 0 ) (11) + l,m,k j c (k) [ lm (S R) µm ( r kj) W µm ( r 0j, r k0,a 0 ) ] (12) subsumes the contributions of both magnetic moments of the companion star and influence of binary winds (i.e. the source surface). In Eq.(12), the abbreviation W m Rm S l R l S ( r R, r S,a) = l,m (R R) m Rm l R l ( r R )(S S) mm S 1 ll S ( r S ) (13) a 2l+1 has been introduced. The boundary conditions on the stellar surfaces are given by maps of the radial magnetic field component. The coefficients, B (j) l m, resulting from the expansion of these maps in terms of spherical harmonics, determine the magnetic moments c (j) B (j) l m = l +1 a l +2 j l a l 1 j c (j) l m +l a l 1 j k j,l,m [ l,m (S R) m m l l W m m l l ( r 0j, r j0,a 0 )c (j) lm lm : ] ( r kj) W m m l l ( r 0j, r k0,a 0 ) c (k) lm (14) In the case of a binary system, a solution of the linear system of equations ( ) ) B (1) l,m /a l 1 1 B (2) l,m /a l 1 2 = ( M11 M )( 12 M 21 M 22 c (1) l,m c (2) l,m (15) with { δ ll δ mm (l +1)a (2l +1) j +l W m,m l M jk =,l ( r 0j, r j0,a 0 ), j = k l (S R) m,m l,l ( r kj )+l W m,m l,l ( r 0j, r k0,a (16) 0), j k determines the expansion coefficients and, thus, the structure of the joint magnetosphere. 3. Example: V4046 Sgr We demonstrate the applicabality of our method through the reconstruction of the joint magnetosphere of the young ( 13 Myr) pre-main sequence binary V4046 Sgr. Figure.2

V. Holzwarth & S.G. Gregory 513 Figure.2: Surface distributions of the radial magnetic field strength on the primary (top) and secondary (bottom) component of the pre-ms binary V4046 Sgr, reconstructed from Zeeman-Doppler imaging observations (Donati et al. 2011).

514 Potential Magnetic Field Extrapolation in Binary Star Systems shows surface maps of the radial magnetic field strength of both stellar components, based on spectropolarimetric observations using ESPaDOnS at the CFHT in 2009 (Donati et al. 2011; Gregory et al. 2014). The system parameters (cf. Fig..1) used for the reconstruction of the magnetosphere are given in Table.1. The source surface radius of a binary system is, as yet, observationally surface S k k position x k [R ] radius a k [R ] source 0 0 10.0 primary 1 4.3 1.12 secondary 2-4.5 1.04 Table.1: Parameter combination for the potential magnetic field extrapolation of V4046 Sgr, shown in Fig..3; positions, r k = (x k,0,0)t, along the x-axis are relative to centre of mass, CM, of binary system (Fig..1). unconstrained, so that a 0 = 10R is somewhat arbitrarily. This value has been chosen based on the assumption that, for the hemispheres pointing away from the companion, the source surface is in a similar distance as for respective single star models. Our reconstruction reveals complex magnetic field structures in the binary system (Fig..3). The magnetic field in the vicinity of each star is dominated by tilted dipoles, somewhat modified by the influence of higher magnetic moments. Of particular interest are magnetic field structures connecting both stellar components; some S -shaped field lines can be identified which inter-connect the dayside hemisphere of one component with the night side of the other. 4. Discussion Close, late-type binary stars, such as RS CVn and BY Dra systems, are among the most active stellar objects we know. Their combination of rapid rotation and convective motions entails pronounced magnetic activity signatures which are discernible from the visible to the X-ray spectral range. The interpretation of, e.g., the amount and variability of coronal X-ray emission or the location of high-energetic flaring, requires, however, some notion of the magnetic field underlying their atmospheres. To this end, we extend the PFSS technique to close binaries to provide, in conjunction with Zeeman-Doppler imaging observations of photospheric magnetic fields, approximations of their joint magnetospheres. More advanced (e.g. non-linear force-free field) extrapolation techniques are frequently applied locally, for instance to active regions on the Sun, where high-resolution observations permit to set up sophisticated boundary conditions. In the stellar case, however, the lessdemanding PFSS approach seems adequate, because detailed observations of small-scale magnetic field distributions are unavailable. Disregarding electric currents and dissipation mechanisms, the PFSS approximation provides the lowest-energy, and therefore stable, state of the global field configuration. This allows us to address question related to the distribution of open, closed, and inter-connecting magnetic flux on the surfaces of binary stars, the inter-

V. Holzwarth & S.G. Gregory 515 Figure.3: Joint magnetosphere of the pre-ms binary V4046 Sgr. Field line tracings seen from consecutive azimuthal viewing angles, φ; for φ = 0 (top-left), the primary is in the lower half of the picture. Colour shading of the stellar surfaces indicate strength and polarity of the radial magnetic field component.

516 Potential Magnetic Field Extrapolation in Binary Star Systems binary field structure and locations of activity, and on the mass transfer along connecting field lines. Our preliminary results for V4046 Sgr reveal, for instance, complex field structures which connect different hemispheres of both stellar components. Our method of potential magnetic field extrapolation is applicable to detached binary star systems, single stars with exoplanets, and single stars with asymmetric winds (i.e. an off-centred source surface). Objects which deviate significantly from spherical geometry such as semi-detached or contact systems are currently excluded, since any rotational or tidal deformations are neglected. Yet an extension of our method to systems with k max > 2 objects is straightforeward, so that it can easily be applied to N-body problems involving potential fields of different kind, such as source-free magnetic, electric, or gravitational fields. Acknowledgements. SGG acknowledges support from the Science & Technology Facilities Council (STFC) via an Ernest Rutherford Fellowship [ST/J003255/1]. References Donati, J.-F., Gregory, S. G., Montmerle, T., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 417, 1747 Gregory, S. G., Holzwarth, V. R., Donati, J.-F., et al. 2014, European Physical Journal Web of Conferences, 64, 8009 Jardine, M., Wood, K., Collier Cameron, A., Donati, J.-F., & Mackay, D. H. 2002, MNRAS, 336, 1364 Schatten, K. H., Wilcox, J. M., & Ness, N. F. 1969, Solar Phys., 6, 442 Steinborn, E. O., & Ruedenberg, K. 1973, Advances in Quantum Chemistry, 7, 1 Wiegelmann, T., & Sakurai, T. 2012, Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 9, 5