Fayoum University. Dr.: Youssef Gomaa Youssef

Similar documents
8.3 Design of Base Plate for Thickness

TABLE OF CONTANINET 1. Design criteria. 2. Lateral loads. 3. 3D finite element model (SAP2000, Ver.16). 4. Design of vertical elements (CSI, Ver.9).

Explanatory Examples for Ductile Detailing of RC Buildings

Foundation Engineering Prof. Dr N.K. Samadhiya Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee

DESIGN AND DETAILING OF COUNTERFORT RETAINING WALL

Associate Professor. Tel:

B U I L D I N G D E S I G N

twenty one concrete construction: materials & beams ELEMENTS OF ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2014

OUTLINE DESIGN OF COLUMN BASE PLATES AND STEEL ANCHORAGE TO CONCRETE 12/21/ Introduction 2. Base plates. 3. Anchor Rods

Rigid pavement design

Chapter (6) Geometric Design of Shallow Foundations

UNIT II SHALLOW FOUNDATION

3.5 Analysis of Members under Flexure (Part IV)

ε t increases from the compressioncontrolled Figure 9.15: Adjusted interaction diagram

five mechanics of materials Mechanics of Materials Mechanics of Materials Knowledge Required MECHANICS MATERIALS

Annex - R C Design Formulae and Data

Module 11 Design of Joints for Special Loading. Version 2 ME, IIT Kharagpur

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in

R.C. FOUNDATION ANALYSIS, DETAILS & DETAILING

four mechanics of materials Mechanics of Materials Mechanics of Materials Knowledge Required MECHANICS MATERIALS

Beam Bending Stresses and Shear Stress

Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: Ph:

Chapter (3) Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations

EMA 3702 Mechanics & Materials Science (Mechanics of Materials) Chapter 4 Pure Bending Homework Answers

Generation of Biaxial Interaction Surfaces

The Islamic University of Gaza Department of Civil Engineering ENGC Design of Spherical Shells (Domes)

10/14/2011. Types of Shear Failure. CASE 1: a v /d 6. a v. CASE 2: 2 a v /d 6. CASE 3: a v /d 2

Assignment 1 - actions

Introduction to Aerospace Engineering

RETAINING WALL LOADS: Horizontal Equivalent Fluid Pressure = pcf. (Load Case = Soil)

ARC 341 Structural Analysis II. Lecture 10: MM1.3 MM1.13

Simplified Base Isolation Design Procedure. Gordon Wray, P.E.

Chapter 4. Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations. Omitted parts: Sections 4.7, 4.8, 4.13 Examples 4.8, 4.9, 4.

Support Reactions: a + M C = 0; 800(10) F DE(4) F DE(2) = 0. F DE = 2000 lb. + c F y = 0; (2000) - C y = 0 C y = 400 lb

(counterclockwise - ccw)

Objectives. In this section you will learn the following. Development of Bearing Capacity Theory. Terzaghi's Bearing Capacity Theory

The Bearing Capacity of Soils. Dr Omar Al Hattamleh

Foundations with D f equal to 3 to 4 times the width may be defined as shallow foundations. TWO MAIN CHARACTERISTICS ULTIMATE BEARING CAPACITY

Design of a Multi-Storied RC Building

Civil Engineering Design (1) Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns 2006/7

AXIALLY LOADED FRP CONFINED REINFORCED CONCRETE CROSS-SECTIONS

A Study on Behaviour of Symmetrical I-Shaped Column Using Interaction Diagram

Verification Manual. of GEO5 Gravity Wall program. Written by: Ing. Veronika Vaněčková, Ph.D. Verze: 1.0-en Fine Ltd.

Visit Abqconsultants.com. This program Designs and Optimises RCC Chimney and Foundation. Written and programmed

This document downloaded from vulcanhammer.net vulcanhammer.info Chet Aero Marine

Theory of Shear Strength

Chapter Two: Mechanical Properties of materials

Chapter (4) Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations (Special Cases)

Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II)

Seismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design

five Mechanics of Materials 1 ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2017 lecture

Mechanics of Materials CIVL 3322 / MECH 3322

STRESS. Bar. ! Stress. ! Average Normal Stress in an Axially Loaded. ! Average Shear Stress. ! Allowable Stress. ! Design of Simple Connections

Fundamentals of Structural Design Part of Steel Structures

Chapter 7 INTERNAL FORCES

Determine the resultant internal loadings acting on the cross section at C of the beam shown in Fig. 1 4a.

Design Guidelines A Scandinavian Approach

1 Spread footing: Pole_7 Number: 1

Figure 1: Representative strip. = = 3.70 m. min. per unit length of the selected strip: Own weight of slab = = 0.

Tower Cranes & Foundations The Interface & CIRIA C654 Stuart Marchand C.Eng. FICE FIStructE Director Wentworth House Partnership

Evaluation of Scantlings of Corrugated Transverse Watertight Bulkheads in Non-CSR Bulk Carriers Considering Hold Flooding

Supplement: Statically Indeterminate Trusses and Frames

CE 221: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS I CHAPTER 1: STRESS. Dr. Krisada Chaiyasarn Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Thammasat university

Dynamic Earth Pressure Problems and Retaining Walls. Behavior of Retaining Walls During Earthquakes. Soil Dynamics week # 12

CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Job Title Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Column BS8110

Reinforced Soil Structures Reinforced Soil Walls. Prof K. Rajagopal Department of Civil Engineering IIT Madras, Chennai

Module 4 Lecture 20 Pore water pressure and shear strength - 4 Topics

S E C T I O N 1 2 P R O D U C T S E L E C T I O N G U I D E - H E L I C A L S C R E W P I L E F O U N D A T I O N S

Lecture-04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion

Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear

3-BEARING CAPACITY OF SOILS

CHAPTER 4. Design of R C Beams

Design Beam Flexural Reinforcement

Seismic Design, Assessment & Retrofitting of Concrete Buildings. fctm. h w, 24d bw, 175mm 8d bl, 4. w 4 (4) 2 cl

DESIGN OF STRAP (CANTILEVER) FOOTINGS Design Steps and Equations

CHAPTER 5. T a = 0.03 (180) 0.75 = 1.47 sec 5.12 Steel moment frame. h n = = 260 ft. T a = (260) 0.80 = 2.39 sec. Question No.

Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear

Design of RC Retaining Walls

CH. 5 TRUSSES BASIC PRINCIPLES TRUSS ANALYSIS. Typical depth-to-span ratios range from 1:10 to 1:20. First: determine loads in various members

two structural analysis (statics & mechanics) Structural Requirements Structure Requirements Structure Requirements serviceability efficiency

F = 140 N. 1. A mechanic pulls on the 13-mm combination wrench with the 140 N force shown. Determine the moment of this force about the bolt center O.

REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDING DESIGN. Beam design M.S.KIRÇIL

DESIGN OF STAIRCASE. Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim. Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

8 ft. 5 k 5 k 5 k 5 k. F y = 36 ksi F t = 21 ksi F c = 10 ksi. 6 ft. 10 k 10 k

Lecture-03 Design of Reinforced Concrete Members for Flexure and Axial Loads

twenty one concrete construction: shear & deflection ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2014 lecture

PLATE GIRDERS II. Load. Web plate Welds A Longitudinal elevation. Fig. 1 A typical Plate Girder

Reinforced Concrete Structures

Practical Design to Eurocode 2. The webinar will start at 12.30

Hyperbolic Soil Bearing Capacity

Deep Foundations 2. Load Capacity of a Single Pile

Lecture-09 Introduction to Earthquake Resistant Analysis & Design of RC Structures (Part I)

SEM-2016(01HI CIVIL ENGINEERING. Paper Answer all questions. Question No. 1 does not have internal choice,

CHAPTER 6: ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE

Static Failure (pg 206)

Beams are bars of material that support. Beams are common structural members. Beams can support both concentrated and distributed loads

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet

Application nr. 7 (Connections) Strength of bolted connections to EN (Eurocode 3, Part 1.8)

Available online at ScienceDirect. Transportation Research Procedia 14 (2016 )

Author(s) Sawamura, Yasuo; Kishida, Kiyoshi;

Transcription:

Fayoum University Faculty o Engineering Department o Civil Engineering CE 40: Part Shallow Foundation Design Lecture No. (6): Eccentric Footing Dr.: Yousse Gomaa Yousse

Eccentric Footing Eccentric ooting: spread or wall ooting that also must resist a moment in addition to the axial column load. e < /6

Eccentric Loads or oments P P P D. L L. L e ( PW ) e < /6

Eccentric Footing Combined axial and bending stresses increase the pressure on one edge or corner o a ooting. We assume again a linear distribution based on a constant relationship to settling. I the pressure combination is in tension, this eectively means the contact is gone between soil and ooting and the pressure is really zero. To avoid zero pressure, the eccentricity must stay within the kern. The maximum pressure must not exceed the net allowable soil pressure. CE 40: Foundation Engineering Design

The kern To avoid zero pressure, the eccentricity must stay within the kern. /3 CE 40: Foundation Engineering Design

Eccentric Loads or oments Cases e </6 Case (a) e =/6 Case (b) e >/6 Case (c) CE 40: Foundation Engineering Design

Eccentric Loads or oments For case and B (not case C) min P * B ( 6e ) max P * B ( 6e ) For case c C max * P 3* C * B 3C 0. 75. max 0 a e >/6 Case (c) CE 40: Foundation Engineering Design

Footing Subjected to Double oment P e eb ( 6 6 * B B ) For contact pressure to remain (+) ve everywhere, 6e 6e B B.0 CE 40: Foundation Engineering Design

Design o Eccentric Footing Plain concrete ooting (P.C.) P.50P. rea * B ssume a G S rea t P F.L H D H * D F. L P F. L.5* PG. s Check max a e 6 PF. L 6e ( ) * B e P F. L F. L B t max min ssume thickness o P.C.: Dim. o P.C. = * B * t t = (0.5 to 0.50) CE 40: Foundation Engineering Design

Design o Spread Footing Reinorced concrete ooting (R.C.) X ( 0.8.0)t X e, P G. S P 6e ( G. S * B ) B B X a P I 3 a ( ) / ( 3 a )( ) * 3 t II ( B b ) )*( 3 d C b * Fcu t d cover Dim. o R.C. = * B * t CE 40: Foundation Engineering Design

Design o Spread Footing Shear Stress: P ( 4 Q s ( II ) d ) a *( ) a ( Q s ( III ) d ) B b *( ) t (II) d s su Qs b* d cu 0.75 c su 4 (II) Notes: I s > su, Increase d No shear RFT in Footing. Q s : shear orce at critical sec. (II). s : shear stress. su : ultimate shear strength. CE 40: Foundation Engineering Design

Design o Spread Footing Punching Stress: a P Q p ( ).50PG. S [( a d)*( b d)] t d ** ( a d ) ( b d ) p p Q p p d/ a d/ 0.5 ( a / b) / / cup cu c cu c d/ b d/ I p > cup, Increase d CE 40: Foundation Engineering Design

Design o Spread Footing Footing Reinorcement: s y I * d * j a s y II * d * j t ain RFT s ain RFT s Notes: inimum number o bars per meter is ive. inimum diameter or main RFT is mm. Number o bars may be taken 5 to 8. Diameter o bars may be selected rom to 8mm. CE 40: Foundation Engineering Design

Example(): Design o Eccentric Footing ake a complete design or a ooting supporting a 30cm X 60cm column load o 0t at ground surace (.), 0m.t moment and 0t horizontal orce at. The oundation level is.00 m below. and the net allowable bearing capacity is 0.80kg/cm. ake the design considering the ollowing two cases: - with plain concrete base - without Plain concrete base a = 0.60m. B= 0.30m p = 0t =0m.t H=0t cu = 50kg/cm. y =3600kg/cm a = 0.80kg/cm = 8t/m. CE 40: Foundation Engineering Design

Design o Eccentric Footing Plain concrete ooting (P.C.) rea.50* P.50*0 8 G. S * B. 5m a ssume rea 4.75 5. 00m F. L 0 0*.00. 40mt t t P H=0 P F.L.00 PF. L.5* PG. s.5*0 38t e max P F. L ssume thickness o P.C.: t = 0.30 40 38 F. L 0.90 38 6*0.90 ( ) 8 5* B 5.00 e 6 CE 40: Foundation Engineering Design 5 6 0.833 B 4. 65m max min Dim. o P.C. = 5.00* 4.65 * 0.30

Design o Eccentric Footing Reinorced concrete ooting (R.C.) X t 0. 30m X 5.00 *0.30 4. 40m B B X 4.65 *0.30 4. 05m 0.60 e I P 0 0*.70 G. S 0 0.308m.50*0 6*0.308, ( ) 4.34 5.85 4.40*4.05 4.40 II 4.4 0.60 0.67( ) / 4.34 5.85 4.05 0.30 ( )*( ) 4.4 0.6 (4.34 0.67)( ) CE 40: Foundation Engineering Design 35.33 5 47.36*0 d 5 68.8 70cm 00*50 t 70 5 75cm * 47.36 3 t F =4.34 F 3 =0.67 =4.40 P.90 F =5.85 Dim. o R.C. = 4.40 * 4.05* 0.75

Design o Spread Footing Shear Stress: P (.84 5.85) 4 5.85 *(.90 0.60 0.6).84 4.40 Q s (4.34.84) ( II ) *(.90 0.70) 5.7 (II) d 0.60.90 t Q s (4.34 5.85) 4.05 0.3 ( III ) *( 0.70).86 =5.85 s.7*000 5.4kg/ cm 9.68 00*70 =4.34 (II) 4 =.84 =4.40 Notes: I s > su, Increase d No shear RFT in Footing. Q s : shear orce at critical sec. (II). s : shear stress. su : ultimate shear strength. CE 40: Foundation Engineering Design

Design o Spread Footing Punching Stress: a P Q p p (4.34 5.85).50*0 [(0.60 0.70)*(0.30 0.70)] 66.88 0.70**[(0.60 0.70) (0.30.70)] 3. t p Q p p p 66.88*000 4 3.*0 5.8 d/ a d/ 0.5 ( a / b) / / cup cu c cu c d/ b d/ I p > cup, Increase d CE 40: Foundation Engineering Design

Design o Spread Footing Footing Reinorcement: 5 47.36*0 3600*70*0.86 s.75 0.60 5 35.33*0 3600*70*0.86 s 6.97 0.75 ain RFT 68/m ain RFT 88/m Notes: inimum number o bars per meter is ive. inimum diameter or main RFT is mm. Number o bars may be taken 5 to 8. Diameter o bars may be selected rom to 8mm. 4.40 CE 40: Foundation Engineering Design

Crane Footing aximum stress on soil should be less than allowable bearing capacity max a The ratio between maximum and minimum stresses should be less than our max min 4 max min ( 6e / ( 6e / ) ) 4 0e CE 40: Foundation Engineering Design

Uniorm Stress below Footing Subjected to oment Uniorm stress reuired that the eccentricity at oundation level eual zero P F. L e 0.0 e 0. 0 G. s. e a/ P c c a e P F.L.5P * B G. S B a a CE 40: Foundation Engineering Design