Interaction of particles with matter - 2. Silvia Masciocchi, GSI and University of Heidelberg SS2017, Heidelberg May 3, 2017

Similar documents
Outline. Chapter 6 The Basic Interactions between Photons and Charged Particles with Matter. Photon interactions. Photoelectric effect

Interaction of Electron and Photons with Matter

The interaction of radiation with matter

Chapter 2 Radiation-Matter Interactions

III. Energy Deposition in the Detector and Spectrum Formation

Interaction theory Photons. Eirik Malinen

Bethe-Block. Stopping power of positive muons in copper vs βγ = p/mc. The slight dependence on M at highest energies through T max

Particle Interactions in Detectors

Interaction X-rays - Matter

Physics of Radiotherapy. Lecture II: Interaction of Ionizing Radiation With Matter

Particle Detectors A brief introduction with emphasis on high energy physics applications

INTERACTIONS OF RADIATION WITH MATTER

The Cherenkov effect

Emphasis on what happens to emitted particle (if no nuclear reaction and MEDIUM (i.e., atomic effects)

Last Lecture 1) Silicon tracking detectors 2) Reconstructing track momenta

Applied Nuclear Physics (Fall 2006) Lecture 19 (11/22/06) Gamma Interactions: Compton Scattering

Airo International Research Journal October, 2015 Volume VI, ISSN:

Particle Detectors. How to See the Invisible

Particle Detectors. Summer Student Lectures 2010 Werner Riegler, CERN, History of Instrumentation History of Particle Physics

PHYS 5012 Radiation Physics and Dosimetry

The Compton Effect. Martha Buckley MIT Department of Physics, Cambridge, MA (Dated: November 26, 2002)

Electromagnetic and hadronic showers development. G. Gaudio, M. Livan The Art of Calorimetry Lecture II

7 Particle Identification. Detectors for Particle Physics Manfred Krammer Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna, Austria

Interaction of charged particles and photons with matter

Radiation Detection for the Beta- Delayed Alpha and Gamma Decay of 20 Na. Ellen Simmons

For the next several lectures, we will be looking at specific photon interactions with matter. In today s lecture, we begin with the photoelectric

EEE4101F / EEE4103F Radiation Interactions & Detection

Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics

DR KAZI SAZZAD MANIR

Lecture 16 Light transmission and optical detectors

PHYS 5012 Radiation Physics and Dosimetry

CHAPTER 2 INTERACTION OF RADIATION WITH MATTER

CHARGED PARTICLE INTERACTIONS

Detectors for High Energy Physics

MSE 321 Structural Characterization

Interaction of Ionizing Radiation with Matter

Detecting high energy photons. Interactions of photons with matter Properties of detectors (with examples)

An Introduction to Diffraction and Scattering. School of Chemistry The University of Sydney

Particle Energy Loss in Matter

Possible Interactions. Possible Interactions. X-ray Interaction (Part I) Possible Interactions. Possible Interactions. section

Interaction of Particles and Matter

Atomic Structure and Processes

Motivation. g-spectroscopy deals with g-ray detection and is one of the most relevant methods to investigate excited states in nuclei.

Physics 663. Particle Physics Phenomenology. April 23, Physics 663, lecture 4 1

(10%) (c) What other peaks can appear in the pulse-height spectrum if the detector were not small? Give a sketch and explain briefly.

Physics 736. Experimental Methods in Nuclear-, Particle-, and Astrophysics. Lecture 3

Radiation Physics PHYS /251. Prof. Gocha Khelashvili

General Information. Muon Lifetime Update. Today s Agenda. The next steps. Reports due May 14

Ionization Energy Loss of Charged Projectiles in Matter. Steve Ahlen Boston University

Photons: Interactions

Photon Interactions in Matter

Shell Atomic Model and Energy Levels

Interactions of Radiation with Matter

2. Passage of Radiation Through Matter

MATR316, Nuclear Physics, 10 cr

Interactions with Matter Photons, Electrons and Neutrons

Detection and measurement of gamma-radiation by gammaspectroscopy

X-ray Energy Spectroscopy (XES).

Particle Energy Loss in Matter

2nd-Meeting. Ionization energy loss. Multiple Coulomb scattering (plural and single scattering, too) Tracking chambers

The Bohr Model of Hydrogen

is the minimum stopping potential for which the current between the plates reduces to zero.

Detectors & Beams. Giuliano Franchetti and Alberica Toia Goethe University Frankfurt GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung

Dedicated Arrays: MEDEA GDR studies (E γ = MeV) Highly excited CN E*~ MeV, 4 T 8 MeV

Interaction of Radiation with Matter

Chemical Engineering 412

Radiator. CBM-TRD TDR review 2017, March 14th. Cyrano Bergmann WWU Muenster, Germany

Lecture 3: Optical Properties of Insulators, Semiconductors, and Metals. 5 nm

Particle Detectors and Quantum Physics (2) Stefan Westerhoff Columbia University NYSPT Summer Institute 2002

Lecture 3 - Compton Scattering

hν' Φ e - Gamma spectroscopy - Prelab questions 1. What characteristics distinguish x-rays from gamma rays? Is either more intrinsically dangerous?

Notes on x-ray scattering - M. Le Tacon, B. Keimer (06/2015)

University of Oslo. Department of Physics. Interaction Between Ionizing Radiation And Matter, Part 2 Charged-Particles.

Introduction. X-Ray Production and Quality. Fluorescence Yield. Fluorescence X-Rays. Initiating event. Initiating event 3/18/2011

Outline. Radiation Interactions. Spurs, Blobs and Short Tracks. Introduction. Radiation Interactions 1

Inelastic soft x-ray scattering, fluorescence and elastic radiation

THE NATURE OF THE ATOM. alpha particle source

Nuclear and Particle Physics 4b Physics of the Quark Gluon Plasma

Physics 736. Experimental Methods in Nuclear-, Particle-, and Astrophysics. Lecture 4

EEE4106Z Radiation Interactions & Detection

Neutron Interactions Part I. Rebecca M. Howell, Ph.D. Radiation Physics Y2.5321

Particle nature of light & Quantization

Passage of particles through matter

High-energy collision processes involving intense laser fields

Quantum and Atomic Physics - Multiple Choice

Detectors in Nuclear Physics (48 hours)

LECTURE 4 PRINCIPLE OF IMAGE FORMATION KAMARUL AMIN BIN ABDULLAH

Rb, which had been compressed to a density of 1013

Neutrino detection. Kate Scholberg, Duke University International Neutrino Summer School Sao Paulo, Brazil, August 2015

DUAL NATURE OF RADIATION AND MATTER

Calorimetry in. in Nuclear and Particle Physics Experiments

Queen s University PHYS 352

Exercise 1 Atomic line spectra 1/9

Chapter 37 Early Quantum Theory and Models of the Atom. Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.

LECTURE 6: INTERACTION OF RADIATION WITH MATTER

2 Particle Interaction with Matter

remsstrahlung 1 Bremsstrahlung

Radiation processes and mechanisms in astrophysics I. R Subrahmanyan Notes on ATA lectures at UWA, Perth 18 May 2009

Physics Lecture 6

Applied Nuclear Physics (Fall 2006) Lecture 21 (11/29/06) Detection of Nuclear Radiation: Pulse Height Spectra

Transcription:

Interaction of particles with matter - 2 Silvia Masciocchi, GSI and University of Heidelberg SS2017, Heidelberg May 3, 2017

Energy loss by ionization (by heavy particles) Interaction of electrons with matter: Energy loss by ionization Bremsstrahlung Cherenkov effect Transition radiation Interaction of photons Charged particles Lectures LAST WEEK TODAY Photoelectric effect Compton scattering Pair production 2

Cherenkov effect A charged particle with mass M and velocity β = v/c travels in a medium with refractive index n: n2 = ε1 = (c/cm)2 Cherenkov 1934 ε1 = real part of the medium dielectric constant cm = speed of light in medium = c/n If v > cm, namely β > βthr = 1/n real photons are emitted: Photons are soft p p' ω γmc2 Characteristic emission angle 1 cos c = = k v n Cherenkov angle 3

Cherenkov: first application Threshold detector: use different materials (refractive indices) such that particles of different masses, at equal momentum p, produce Cherenkov radiation of not (pass the threshold or not): Choose n1, n2 such that for a given p (β = p/e): 1 n1, K K, p 1 n1 p 1 n2 1 n2 Particle identification: light in C1 and C2 pion light in C1 and not in C2 kaon no light in both C1 and C2 proton 4

Cherenkov radiation: spectrum Consider the spectrum of emitted photons per unit length versus: Wavelength: short wavelengths dominate (blue) e.g. integrate over the typical sensitivity range of a good/typical photomultiplier (300-600 nm): Energy 5

Cherenkov effect: typical numbers Number of photons per cm of radiator: assume n(ω) constant (e.g. true for visible light produced in gases 300 < λ < 600 nm) Energy loss: the energy loss by Cherenkov radiation is negligible wrt the one by ionization! 6

Cherenkov effect: momentum dependence Asymptotic behavior of the Cherenkov angle and the number of produced photons, as a function of the particle momentum p (for β 1): 1 n 1 1 N =x 370 /cm 1 2 2 x 370 /cm 1 2 n n cos C cos C = 7

Application: measurement of β In a medium of known refractive index n, measure the Cherenkov angle and therefore determine the particle β = p/e ( identity) Principle of: RICH Ring Imaging CHerenkov Detector DIRC Detection of Internally Reflected Cherenkov light DISC special variant of DIRC 8

RICH detectors Principle: image the Cherenkov cone into a ring, of which measure the radius. Particle momentum provided by other detectors Components: radiator (+ mirror) + photon detector 9

The LHCb RICH-1 detector Two radiators: aerogel + C4F10 Spherical + flat mirrors Hybrid Photon Detectors 10

Necessary radiator thickness For a good measurement of the ring (and consequently of β), a sufficient number of photons must be produced and a sufficient number of photoelectrons must be detected! ne = nγ (Cherenkov) x εlight collection x ηquantum efficiency εlight collection 0.8 ηquantum efficiency 0.2 Example: ask for ne 4 to reconstruct a good ring The efficiency must be 90% ne follows a Poisson distribution: P(4)+P(5)+P(6)+... > 0.9 < ne > = 7 need nγ (Cherenkov) ~ 44 photons e.g. 0.4 m freon Interaction of particles with matter, May 2017,3 11

Spherical mirror array: LHCb 12

Transition radiation A particle at high energy (= large γ) crossing the boundary between two different dielectrics, having different indices of refraction, can produce transition radiation can emit real photons Predicted by Ginzburg and Frank (1946) Observed (optically) by Goldsmith and Jelley (1959) Experimental confirmation with X-ray measurement (1970s) Explanation: re-arrangement of electric field 13

Transition radiation: classical model Simple classical model: electron moves in vacuum towards a conducting plate E-field described by method of mirror charges as generated by dipole: p p = 2e a E n 3 2 2 2 a Dipole moment changes in time induces the radiation of photons Radiated power: E dp d ℏ mc 2 ω-independent white spectrum dp ~ γ (but check the relativistic generalization dp ~ α one α per boundary 14

Transition radiation: full calculation Full quantum mechanical calculation: Interference: coherent superposition of radiation from neighboring points in vicinity of the track angular distribution strongly peaked forward Depth from boundary up to which contributions add coherently formation length D Volume element producing coherent radiation V max E ℏ p Photon energy: X-rays 1 c D p V = max D Relevant parameter: plasma frequency ωp: Typical values: polyethylene CH2 ωp= 20 ev, ρ=1 g/cm3 D 10 μm For d > D absorption effects important! Consider foils of thickness D! Per boundary: ~ α photons many boundaries!! O(100 foils) <nγ> ~ 1-2 15

Transition radiation spectrum Oscillations are due to interference between successive boundaries X-ray photon energy spectra for a radiator consisting of 200 25 μm thick foils of Mylar and for a single surface 16

Principle of a transition radiation detector 17

Principle of a transition radiation detector Choice of 1) radiator material and structure 2) photon detector Minimize photon absorption in the radiator Maximize photon absorption in the detector 18

Principle of a transition radiation detector Expected performance for polyethylene radiator foil stacks and various detector gases: 19

ALICE TRD 20

ALICE TRD Demonstration of the onset of TR at βγ 500 (X. Lu, Hd) 21

ALICE TDR 22

Interaction of photons with matter Characteristic of photons: can be removed from incoming beam of intensity I, with one single interaction: di = - I μ dx μ (E, Z, ρ): absorption coefficient Lambert-Beer law of attenuation: I(x) = I0 exp( - μx ) 1 1 = = n Mean free path of photon in matter: To become independent from state (liquid, gaseous): mass absorption coefficient: = = NA A Example: Eγ = 100 kev, Z=26 (iron), λ= 3 g/cm2 or 0.4 cm 23

Interaction processes The most important processes of interaction of photons with matter, in order of growing importance with increasing photon energy E, are: Photoelectric effect Compton scattering: incoherent scattering off an electron pair production: interaction in nuclear field Other processes, not as important for energy loss: Rayleigh scattering: coherent γ + A γ + A : atom neither ionized nor excited Thomson scattering: elastic scattering γ + e γ + e Photo nuclear absorption: γ + nucleus (p or n) + nucleus Hadron pair production: γ + A h+ + h + A 24

Absorption length Particle Data Group, 2016 25

Photoelectric effect γ + atom atom+ + eee = hν Ib Where: hν = Eγ = photon energy, Ib = binding energy of the electron (K, L, M absorption edges) Binding energy depends strongly on Z the cross section will depend strongly on Z: 7 I 5 0 2 I E mc2: = a Z Ph b γ E where: ab=0.53 x 10-10 m I0=13.6 ev e.g. = 0.1 MeV σph(fe) = 29 b σph(pb) = 5 kb 5 Eγ mc2: Z Ph E 26

Photoelectric effect - 2 The de-excitation of the excited atom can happen via two main processes: Auger electrons: atom** + atom* + + e Auger electrons deposit their energy locally due to their very small energy (<10 kev) Fluorescence: atom** + atom* + + γ Fluorescence photons (X-rays) must interact via the photoelectric effect much longer range The relative fluorescence yield increases with Z wk = P(fluor.) / [P(fluor.) + P(Auger)] 27

Photon total cross section Photoelectric effect 28

Compton scattering Incoherent scattering of photon off an electron: γ + e (γ)' + (e )' Energy of the outgoing photon: Kinetic energy of the outgoing electron: Feynman diagram Max energy transfer in back scattering: 29

Compton edge If the scattered photon is not absorbed in the detector material, there will be a small amount of energy missing from the Full Energy Peak (FEP) Compton edge FEP: photoelectric effect and Compton effect when the scattered photon is absorbed in the detector. Intensity depends on detector volume, width depends on detector resolution. 30

Compton effect: cross section Thomson cross section (γe γe): Integrating the differential cross section by Klein and Nishina: 31

Photon total cross section Compton effect 32

Compton: angular distribution Klein-Nishina differential distribution Photons with large energies peaked in forward direction 33

Pair production: Bethe-Heitler process Interaction in the Coulomb field of the atomic nucleus (not possible in free space) Energy threshold: me E 2 me c 1 mn 2 2x electron mass kinetic energy transferred to nucleus Angular distribution: the produced electrons are in a narrow forward cone, with opening angle of θ = me / Eγ 34

Pair production: Bethe-Heitler process Cross section: raises above threshold, but eventually saturates at large Eγ because of screening effects of the nuclear charge Eγ mec2 Pair 7 183 1 = 4 Z r ln 1/ 3 9 Z 54 2 2 e 183 2 2 7 4 Z r e ln 1/3 9 Z 35

Pair production: Bethe-Heitler process Pair production cross section Pair 7 183 7 A 2 2 4 r e Z ln 1/3 = X0 9 9 NA Z X0: radiation length (in cm or g/cm2) Absorption coefficient: (μ = nσ n=particle density) Pair NA = Pair A 7 1 9 X0 36

Pair production: fractional e-,e+ energy k = incident photon energy x = fractional energy transfer to the pair-produced electron (or positron) = E/k Normalized pair-production cross section versus the fractional electron energy: necessarily symmetric At ultra-high energies (TeV) Landau-Pomeranchuk-Migdal effect: quantum mechanical interference between amplitudes from different scattering centers. Relevant scale: formation length = length over which highly relativistic electron and photon split apart Negative interference: reduction of cross section 37

Total photon cross section and absorption length 38

Photon absorption length I(x) = I0 exp( - x/λ ) 1 MeV photon travels about 1 cm in Pb, about 5 cm in C 39

Contribution by pair production Probability P that a photon interaction will result in conversion to an e+e pair For increasing photon energy, pair production becomes dominant: for Pb beyond 4 MeV for H beyond 70 MeV 40

Next lectures We review the most important type of particle detectors in use in particle and nuclear physics: Gas detectors Semiconductor detectors Scintillators Calorimeters 41

Gas detectors 42

Gas detectors 43

Gas detectors Modes of operation depending on the strength of the electric field applied W. Price, Nuclear Radiation Detection, 1958 44