RIG HYDRAULICS. P 1 = Eρ 0.8 Q 1.8 (PV) 0.2. psi or bar. P 1 ρ. = pressure loss, psi or bar = Density, ppg or kg/l = flow rate, gpm, l/min

Similar documents
SKM DRILLING ENGINEERING. Chapter 3 - Drilling Hydraulics

Hydraulics! 10 An Overview!

Analyses of Field Measured Data With Rheology and Hydraulics Models

Optimization of Hydraulic Horsepower to Predict the Rate of Penetration

Case Study: Direct Circulation Drilling

Fluids, Hole Cleaning and Tripping Optimization

Hydraulics and wellbore cleaning

Optimizing Hole Cleaning Using Low Viscosity Drilling Fluid

Atmospheric pressure. 9 ft. 6 ft

TOTAL HEAD, N.P.S.H. AND OTHER CALCULATION EXAMPLES Jacques Chaurette p. eng., June 2003

LEAKLESS COOLING SYSTEM V.2 PRESSURE DROP CALCULATIONS AND ASSUMPTIONS

Rafał Wiśniowski*, Krzysztof Skrzypaszek*, Piotr Kiebzak* ECD OPTIMIZATION WITH SPECIALLY DESIGNED LOW RHEOLOGY DRILLING FLUIDS**

An Analysis of The Flow Resistance in Coiled Tubing Wound Around A Reel, In Microhole Drilling

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS OIL, GAS, AND PETROCHEMICALS. The Energy and Resources Institute

Utilizing Instrumented Stand Pipe for Monitoring Drilling Fluid Dynamics for Improving Automated Drilling Operations

Drilling fluids & Maintenance equipment

The Effect of High Pressures and High Temperatures on the Properties of Water Based Drilling Fluids

The following article was authored by Jacques Chaurette, President Fluide Design, Inc. ( All rights reserved.

Cutting transport parametric sensitivity simulation studies in vertical and deviated wells. Faculty of Science and Technology MASTER S THESIS

AADE-03-NTCE-29. Copyright 2003 AADE Technical Conference

Rotary Drilling Rotary Drilling Bits

Exploring and Drilling for Oil and Gas. Prepared by Tom Sheeran

GRAPHICAL EVALUATION OF CUTTINGS TRANSPORT IN DEVIATED WELLS USING BINGHAM PLASTIC FLUID MODEL

Exploration Drilling Techniques

Maximizing Drilling Performance through Enhanced Solid Control System

Instructional Objectives

Drilling Fluid Thixotropy & Relevance

Study fluid dynamics. Understanding Bernoulli s Equation.

CHAPTER EIGHT P U M P I N G O F L I Q U I D S

Drilling Operations of the first Iceland Deep Drilling Well (IDDP)

Figure 3: Problem 7. (a) 0.9 m (b) 1.8 m (c) 2.7 m (d) 3.6 m

LECTURE 6- ENERGY LOSSES IN HYDRAULIC SYSTEMS SELF EVALUATION QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Only if handing in. Name: Student No.: Page 2 of 7

AGENDA. Criteria for Fluid Selection Controlling Cost Continuously Improving Performance

DESIGN OF AN ULTRA-SPEED LAB-SCALE DRILLING RIG FOR SIMULATION OF HIGH SPEED DRILLING OPERATIONS IN HARD ROCKS. *V. Rasouli, B.

AADE 02 DFWM-HO-14. Low Shear Rate Rheology: Clarifying Muddied Waters Terry Hemphill, Baroid product service line, Halliburton.

FLOW MEASUREMENT IN PIPES EXPERIMENT

Barite Segregation in Inclined Boreholes

Lewis A. Buitrago Gomez*, Stefan Z. Miska*, Małgorzata B. Ziaja* EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF LAYOUTS OF PDC CUTTERS IN CORE BIT DRILLING

Antelope Hills Directionally Drilled Water Well. Theresa Jehn-Dellaport Jehn Water Consultants, Inc.

The Top 10 Myths, Misconceptions and Mysteries in Rheology and Hydraulics

Physics 123 Unit #1 Review

Omohimoria Charles, Falade Adetokunbo.

Bernoulli and Pipe Flow

Applied Fluid Mechanics

CVR System. Critical Velocity Reduction A Combination of Dead Strings, Capillary Injection Foamer and Plunger Lift

Eng Sample Test 4

Calculation of Pipe Friction Loss

Determining Liquid Capacity 4 th Annual Pipeline Knowledge Retention Chris Sonneborn November 7, 2013

Opitmising riser-less Drilling

Torque and drag modelling for Redhill South-1 in the Northern Perth Basin, Australia

Chapter 6. Losses due to Fluid Friction

WEF Residuals and Biosolids Conference 2017

OPTIMIZE PIPELINE DESIGN

CENTRIFUGAL PUMP SELECTION, SIZING, AND INTERPRETATION OF PERFORMANCE CURVES

EXPERIMENT No.1 FLOW MEASUREMENT BY ORIFICEMETER

J.J. Kollé and M. H. Marvin. Tempress Technologies Inc. 2000

CHAPTER 12 Turbomachinery

HYDRAULIC CONTROL SYSTEMS

Real Time Rock Destruction for Engineered Performance Improvement

EGYPT: SILDRIL Gives Top Performance in Nile Delta Well

Production Introduction 中誉重工 ZHONGYU HEAVY IND. Drilling Rig. Nikko Lee

Non Newtonian Fluid Dynamics

Early Exploration Permit Activity Information

Numerical Simulation of Micro-annulus Carrying Capacity ABSTRACT

AADE-04-DF-HO-37. Copyright 2004, AADE Drilling Fluids Technical Conference

Lecture 4. Lab this week: Cartridge valves Flow divider Properties of Hydraulic Fluids. Lab 8 Sequencing circuit Lab 9 Flow divider

Rate of Flow Quantity of fluid passing through any section (area) per unit time

When water (fluid) flows in a pipe, for example from point A to point B, pressure drop will occur due to the energy losses (major and minor losses).

Fluid Dynamics Midterm Exam #2 November 10, 2008, 7:00-8:40 pm in CE 110

AADE-04-DF-HO-21. A Unique Technical Solution to Barite Sag in Drilling Fluids Jarrod Massam, Andy Popplestone, and Andrew Burn, M-I SWACO

Chapter Four Hydraulic Machines

EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF RHEOLOGICAL PROPERTY OF LOCAL VISCOSIFER ON HOLE CLEANING

Filtration. Praktikum Mechanical Engineering. Spring semester 2016

FIGURE OF FRONT COVER

Hydraulic Design Of Polyethylene Pipes

STICK-SLIP WHIRL INTERACTION IN DRILLSTRING DYNAMICS

Improving The Efficiency Of Transportation Of Cuttings In Wellbore

Three-Tank Experiment

The most common methods to identify velocity of flow are pathlines, streaklines and streamlines.

ME 316: Thermofluids Laboratory

NOTICE CONCERNING COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS

FRICTION LOSS ALONG A PIPE

Helping people understand what drilling data is telling them. Frode Sørmo, Chief Technology Officer

WATER DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS

Respect the Rheology!

8.1 Technically Feasible Design of a Heat Exchanger

FLUID MECHANICS D203 SAE SOLUTIONS TUTORIAL 2 APPLICATIONS OF BERNOULLI SELF ASSESSMENT EXERCISE 1

ACE Engineering College

APPENDIX A USEFUL EQUATIONS (METRIC AND IMPERIAL SYSTEMS) THE DEFINITION OF VISCOSITY RHEOLOGICAL (VISCOUS BEHAVIOR) PROPERTIES OF FLUIDS

Faculty of Science and Technology MASTER S THESIS

EFFECT OF NOZZLE ANGLE ON JET IMPINGEMENT COOLING SYSTEM KHAIDER BIN ABU BAKAR

Fluid Mechanics Prof. T.I. Eldho Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay. Lecture - 17 Laminar and Turbulent flows

Chapter 5 Control Volume Approach and Continuity Equation

CVE 372 HYDROMECHANICS EXERCISE PROBLEMS

Effect of Geometric Configuration on Performance of Uniflow Cyclone

AADE-05-NTCE-28 [1, 2, 3]

Chapter 6. Losses due to Fluid Friction

Fluid Mechanics. Spring 2009

Fluids II (Fluids in motion)

Transcription:

RIG HYDRAULICS This chapter covers the following items: Pressure losses Surface connection losses Pressure drop across the bit Optimization of bit hydraulics Surface pressure drop Hydraulic criteria Comparison of BHHP and IF Optimum flow rate Field methods for optimizing bit hydraulics A practical check of the efficiency of bit hydraulic program Pressure Losses The circulation system consists of: pump, surface connections (stand pipe, hose, swivel and Kelly), drill pipe, drill collars, bit, annulus between drill collars and hole, annulus between drill pipe and hole, mud return lines, and mud tanks. Friction of fluid through these parts causes pressure losses The calculation of this pressure losses depend on four parts Surface connection losses Pipe losses Annular losses Losses across the bit Losses depend on the type of fluid used and the type of flow Surface Connection Losses Losses caused through surface connections Depend on the geometry and dimensions of surface connections These dimensions can vary with time Evaluated by: P 1 Eρ 0.8 Q 1.8 (PV) 0.2 or bar P 1 ρ Q pressure loss, or bar Density, ppg or kg/l flow rate, gpm, l/min

PV plastic viscosity, cp E constant depends type of surface connections Value of E Surface Equipment Value of E Type Imperial Units Metric Units 1 2.5x10-4 8.8x10-6 2 9.6x10-5 3.3x10-6 3 5.3x10-5 1.8x10-6 4 4.2x10-5 1.4x10-6 Four types of surface equipment Surface Stand Pipe Rotary Hose Swivel Kelly Equipment Length ID Length ID Length ID Length ID Type (Ft) (in) (Ft) (in) (Ft) (in) (Ft) (in) 1 40 3.0 40 2.0 4 2.0 40 2.25 2 40 3.5 55 2.5 5 2.5 40 3.25 3 45 4.0 55 3.0 5 3.5 40 3.25 4 45 4.0 55 3.0 6 3.0 40 4.00 Pipe and Annular Losses Pipe losses takes place inside drill pipe and drill collars They are designated as P 2 and P 3 Annular losses takes place around drill collars and drill pipe They are designated as P 4 and P 5 The magnitude of these pressures depends on Dimension of pipe Mud rheological properties, weight, plastic viscosity, and yield point Type of flow, laminar or turbulent Several models exist to measure pressure losses Only two are models will be used: the Bingham plastic and the power law The following are the equations used for calculations Bingham Plastic Model

Pipe Flow Determine average velocity Va 24.5Q D2 Determine critical velocity PV + PV 2+ ρd2yp ρd 97 97 ( ) 8.2 Vc If Va > Vc, flow is turbulent; use x 5ρ0.8Q1.8 PV 0.2L D4.8 8.91 10 ( ) P If Va < Vc, flow is laminar; use L P YP ( PV) Va + D 5D 300 Annular flow Determine average velocity Va 24.5Q D OD 2 2 h p Determine critical velocity PV + PV 2+ ρ D 2 YP e ρ( D 97 97 ( ) 6.2 Vc OD ) h p

If Va > Vc, flow is turbulent; use x 5ρ0.8Q1.8 PV 0.2L D 1.8 P 8.91 10 ( ) OD)( 3 D + OD) ( h h If Va < Vc, flow is laminar; use L( PV) Va LYP ( ) P + 60,000( D OD) h 200( Dh OD) 2 2 Power Law Model Determine n and k θ n 3.32log 600 θ 300 θ k 300 (511) n (1/(2 n)) 4 ( n/(2 n)) 5.82(10 ) k 1.6 3n 1 + Vc.. ρ D 4n If Va >Vc flow is turbulent; use x 5ρ0.8Q1.8 PV 0.2L D4.8 8.91 10 ( ) P If Va < Vc flow is laminar; use kl (3n + 1) n 1.6Va P. 300D D 4 n Annular flow Determine average velocity

24.5Q Va D OD 2 2 h p Determine critical velocity (1/(2 n)) 4 ( n/(2 n)) 5.82(10 ) k 1.6 3n+ 1 Vc.. ρ ( D h ODp) 4n If Va > Vc, flow is turbulent; use 8.91 10 ( ) P x 5ρ0.8Q1.8 PV 0.2L D 4.8 If Va < Vc, flow is laminar; use 1.6Va P kl. (3n + 1) 300( D OD) ( D OD) 4n h e h n Pressure loss across bit Need to be optimized to achieve maximum cleaning For given length of drill string and given mud properties, pressure from 1 to 5 remain constant The smaller the nozzle the greater the pressure drop For soft formation, large nozzle is required To calculate pressure loss across and nozzle size use P P ( P P P P P) bit stand pipe + + + + 1 2 3 4 5 Nozzle velocity P Vn 33.36 bit ft s ρ / Total area of nozzles

A 0.32 Q in Vn 2 Nozzle size d 4A 32 3π. n OD outside diameter, in D inside diameter, in L length, ft PV plastic viscosity, cp YP yield value, lb/100ft 2 Optimizing bit hydraulics All hydraulic programs start by calculating pressure drops in the various parts of the circulating systems The pressure loss in the circulating system, except bit, is given the symbol P c Several hydraulic slide rules are available for calculating P c The slide rule is inadequate for calculating annular pressure loss Either annular pressure loss is beyond the sale or flow is laminar and most slide rules used turbulent flow Surface pump pressure The system pressure shoes how much pressure loss can be tolerated at bit The value of P bit is controlled by the maximum allowable surface pump pressure Most rigs have limits on maximum surface pressure with high volume rates (500 gpm) On land rigs typical limits on surface pressure are in the rang 2500 to 3000 for well depth of around 12000 ft For deep wells, heavy-duty pump can give 5000 surface pressure Therefore, optimization of bit hydraulics is necessary Hydraulic criteria Two criteria for optimization

Maximum bit hydraulic horsepower (BHHP) Maximum impact force (IF) Each criteria yields different value of bit pressure loss Engineer is faced with the task to decide which one to choose In most drilling operations the circulation rate is kept constant P bit is the factor to be optimized Maximum bit hydraulic horsepower The bit pressure is the difference between stand pipe pressure and P c For optimum hydraulic P bit must be fraction of stand pipe pressure Surface hydraulic horsepower (HHP s ) is the sum of hydraulic horse power at bit (BHHP) and hydraulic horsepower in the circulating system (HHP c ) BHP s BHHP - HHP c BHHP BHP s - HHP c Hence HHP PQ/1714 Then BHHP P s Q P c KQ n PcQ 1714 1714 K constant n index represents degree of turbulence in the circulating system BHHP PQ s KQ n + 1 1714 1714 Differentiating equation with respect to Q P s (n+1)kq n

P s Also (n+1) P c P c P s - P bit P n bit n + 1 P s The value of n falls in the range 1.8 1.86 For n 1.86, P bit 0.65 P s This means the for optimum hydraulic horsepower, the pressure drop across the bit is 65% of surface pump pressure The actual value of n can be determined in fields by running the pump pressure at several speeds and reading the resulting pressure A graph of P c (P s P bit ) against Q is then drawn The slope of the graph is taken as the index n Maximum impact force P n P bit n + 2 s Impact force is given by IF Q ρp bit 58 Comparison of BHHP and IF criteria The ratio R, of pressure drop across bit is given by the BHHP criteria and IF criteria n n Ps R + 1 n Ps n+ 2 or R n+ 2 n+ 1

The following table shows the value of n and R It shows that R decreases parabolic ally with increasing value of n, but never assumes unity It means that the pressure loss calculated by BHHP is greater than that calculated by IF R as a function of n N R 1 1.50 1.2 1.45 1.5 1.4o 1.8 1.36 2.0 1.33 Optimum flow rate Optimum flow rate is obtained by plotting circulating pressure versus Q The intersection of optimum Pc with the curve gives the optimum flow rate Field method of optimizing bit hydraulics Prior to POH current bit for next bit change, run the pump at four or five speeds and record the resulting stand pipe pressure From current nozzle size and stand pipe pressure and mud weight determine pressure loss across the bit Subtract P bit from stand pipe pressure to get P c Plot a graph of P c against Q on log-log paper and determine the slope to get n For the next bit run calculate P bit using BHHP or IF equations Select nozzle size to for the value of P bit calculated For particular rig and field the index n will not vary widely if the same parameters are used