Feedback Control Systems (FCS)

Similar documents
Stability Criterion Routh Hurwitz

Analysis of Stability &

EE Control Systems LECTURE 14

Linear System Fundamentals

ME2142/ME2142E Feedback Control Systems

Chapter 13. Root Locus Introduction

ROUTH HURWITZ ANALYSIS

1 Routh Array: 15 points

Chapter 7. Root Locus Analysis

Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: Ph:

Root Locus Diagram. Root loci: The portion of root locus when k assume positive values: that is 0

Control Systems Analysis and Design by the Root-Locus Method

MODERN CONTROL SYSTEMS

ROOT LOCUS. Poles and Zeros

Figure 1: Unity Feedback System

Automatic Control Systems. Part III: Root Locus Technique

CONTROL SYSTEMS. Chapter 5 : Root Locus Diagram. GATE Objective & Numerical Type Solutions. The transfer function of a closed loop system is

March 18, 2014 Academic Year 2013/14

Figure 1 Siemens PSSE Web Site

Advanced D-Partitioning Analysis and its Comparison with the Kharitonov s Theorem Assessment

Module 4: Time Response of discrete time systems Lecture Note 1

Mathematical modeling of control systems. Laith Batarseh. Mathematical modeling of control systems

Lecture 4. Chapter 11 Nise. Controller Design via Frequency Response. G. Hovland 2004

Stability. ME 344/144L Prof. R.G. Longoria Dynamic Systems and Controls/Lab. Department of Mechanical Engineering The University of Texas at Austin

MEM 355 Performance Enhancement of Dynamical Systems Root Locus Analysis

Chapter 5 Consistency, Zero Stability, and the Dahlquist Equivalence Theorem

Given the following circuit with unknown initial capacitor voltage v(0): X(s) Immediately, we know that the transfer function H(s) is

Digital Control System

Root Locus Contents. Root locus, sketching algorithm. Root locus, examples. Root locus, proofs. Root locus, control examples

Lecture 12: Examples of Root Locus Plots. Dr. Kalyana Veluvolu. Lecture 12: Examples of Root Locus Plots Dr. Kalyana Veluvolu

EE Control Systems LECTURE 6

Digital Control System

Exercises for lectures 19 Polynomial methods

The Root Locus Method

Automatic Control Systems

Function and Impulse Response

Control Systems Engineering ( Chapter 7. Steady-State Errors ) Prof. Kwang-Chun Ho Tel: Fax:

Control Systems. Root locus.

State Space: Observer Design Lecture 11

Correction for Simple System Example and Notes on Laplace Transforms / Deviation Variables ECHE 550 Fall 2002

S_LOOP: SINGLE-LOOP FEEDBACK CONTROL SYSTEM ANALYSIS

Design of Digital Filters

Control Systems. Root locus.

Control of Delayed Integrating Processes Using Two Feedback Controllers R MS Approach

ME 375 FINAL EXAM SOLUTIONS Friday December 17, 2004

ECEN 605 LINEAR SYSTEMS. Lecture 20 Characteristics of Feedback Control Systems II Feedback and Stability 1/27

Solutions. Digital Control Systems ( ) 120 minutes examination time + 15 minutes reading time at the beginning of the exam

ECE317 : Feedback and Control

7.2 INVERSE TRANSFORMS AND TRANSFORMS OF DERIVATIVES 281

NAME (pinyin/italian)... MATRICULATION NUMBER... SIGNATURE

Lecture 10 Filtering: Applied Concepts

Social Studies 201 Notes for November 14, 2003

Social Studies 201 Notes for March 18, 2005

ME 375 EXAM #1 Tuesday February 21, 2006

Chapter 4 Interconnection of LTI Systems

The Laplace Transform , Haynes Miller and Jeremy Orloff

Analysis and Design of a Third Order Phase-Lock Loop

ME 375 FINAL EXAM Wednesday, May 6, 2009

Wolfgang Hofle. CERN CAS Darmstadt, October W. Hofle feedback systems

G(s) = 1 s by hand for! = 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, and 100 rad/sec.

Some special cases

376 CHAPTER 6. THE FREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN METHOD. D(s) = we get the compensated system with :

CHAPTER 4 DESIGN OF STATE FEEDBACK CONTROLLERS AND STATE OBSERVERS USING REDUCED ORDER MODEL

EE 4443/5329. LAB 3: Control of Industrial Systems. Simulation and Hardware Control (PID Design) The Inverted Pendulum. (ECP Systems-Model: 505)

On Stability of Electronic Circuits

Bogoliubov Transformation in Classical Mechanics

ECE-320 Linear Control Systems. Spring 2014, Exam 1. No calculators or computers allowed, you may leave your answers as fractions.

Convex Hulls of Curves Sam Burton

S.E. Sem. III [EXTC] Circuits and Transmission Lines

The Laplace Transform

NONISOTHERMAL OPERATION OF IDEAL REACTORS Plug Flow Reactor

CHAPTER 8 OBSERVER BASED REDUCED ORDER CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR LARGE SCALE LINEAR DISCRETE-TIME CONTROL SYSTEMS

A VIBRATION ISOLATION SYSTEM USING STIFFNESS VARIATION CAPABILITY OF ZERO-POWER CONTROL

SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY School of Engineering Science ENSC 320 Electric Circuits II. Solutions to Assignment 3 February 2005.

Homework #7 Solution. Solutions: ΔP L Δω. Fig. 1

Fermi Distribution Function. n(e) T = 0 T > 0 E F

Assignment for Mathematics for Economists Fall 2016

The state variable description of an LTI system is given by 3 1O. Statement for Linked Answer Questions 3 and 4 :

Copyright 1967, by the author(s). All rights reserved.

THE IDENTIFICATION OF THE OPERATING REGIMES OF THE CONTROLLERS BY THE HELP OF THE PHASE TRAJECTORY

Lecture 17: Analytic Functions and Integrals (See Chapter 14 in Boas)

THE PARAMETERIZATION OF ALL TWO-DEGREES-OF-FREEDOM SEMISTRONGLY STABILIZING CONTROLLERS. Tatsuya Hoshikawa, Kou Yamada and Yuko Tatsumi

Contents lecture 4. Automatic Control III. Summary of lecture 3 (II/II) Summary of lecture 3 (I/II) Lecture 4 Controller structures and control design

I Stable, marginally stable, & unstable linear systems. I Relationship between pole locations and stability. I Routh-Hurwitz criterion

Chapter 10. Closed-Loop Control Systems

CHEAP CONTROL PERFORMANCE LIMITATIONS OF INPUT CONSTRAINED LINEAR SYSTEMS

An estimation approach for autotuning of event-based PI control systems

Laplace Transformation

SKEE 3143 CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN. CHAPTER 3 Compensator Design Using the Bode Plot

Finite Element Truss Problem

Lecture 5 Introduction to control

FRTN10 Exercise 3. Specifications and Disturbance Models

CISE302: Linear Control Systems

A Simple Approach to Synthesizing Naïve Quantized Control for Reference Tracking

Lecture 8: Period Finding: Simon s Problem over Z N

The Hassenpflug Matrix Tensor Notation

Design By Emulation (Indirect Method)

Then C pid (s) S h -stabilizes G(s) if and only if Ĉpid(ŝ) S 0 - stabilizes Ĝ(ŝ). For any ρ R +, an RCF of Ĉ pid (ŝ) is given by

Gain and Phase Margins Based Delay Dependent Stability Analysis of Two- Area LFC System with Communication Delays

Solutions to homework #10

Transcription:

Feedback Control Sytem (FCS) Lecture19-20 Routh-Herwitz Stability Criterion Dr. Imtiaz Huain email: imtiaz.huain@faculty.muet.edu.pk URL :http://imtiazhuainkalwar.weebly.com/

Stability of Higher Order Sytem 5 2 3 1 10 3 5 1 1 R C ) ( ) ( ) ( 2) 3 ( 1) 10( ) ( ) ( 2 3 4 2 2 R C Un-Stable Stable

Routh-Hurwitz Stability Criterion It i a method for determining continuou ytem tability. The Routh-Hurwitz criterion tate that the number of root of the characteritic equation with poitive real part i equal to the number of change in ign of the firt column of the Routh array.

Routh-Hurwitz Stability Criterion Thi method yield tability information without the need to olve for the cloed-loop ytem pole. Uing thi method, we can tell how many cloed-loop ytem pole are in the left half-plane, in the right half-plane, and on the jw-axi. (Notice that we ay how many, not where.) The method require two tep: 1. Generate a data table called a Routh table. 2. interpret the Routh table to tell how many cloed-loop ytem pole are in the LHP, the RHP, and on the jw-axi.

Routh Stability Condition If the cloed-loop tranfer function ha all pole in the left half of the -plane, the ytem i table. Thu, a ytem i table if there are no ign change in the firt column of the Routh table. The Routh-Hurwitz criterion declare that the number of root of the polynomial that are lie in the right half-plane i equal to the number of ign change in the firt column. Hence the ytem i untable if the pole lie on the right hand ide of the -plane.

Generating a baic Routh Table Only the firt 2 row of the array are obtained from the characteritic eq. the remaining are calculated a follow;

Example#1 Conider the following characteritic equation: Develop Routh array and determine the tability of the ytem.

Conider the following ytem: Example#2 Develop Routh array and determine the tability of the ytem.

Example#3 Find the tability of the continue ytem having the characteritic polynomial of a third order ytem i given below The Routh array i Becaue TWO change in ign appear in the firt column, we find that two root of the characteritic equation lie in the right hand ide of the -plane. Hence the ytem i untable.

Example#4 Determine a rang of value of a ytem parameter K for which the ytem i table. The Routh table of the given ytem i computed and hown i the table below; For ytem tability, it i neceary that the condition 8 k >0, and 1 + k > 0, mut be atified. Hence the rang of value of a ytem parameter k mut lie between -1 and 8 (i.e., -1 < k < 8).

Special Cae Cae-1: Zero in the firt column If firt element of a row i zero, diviion by zero would be required to form the next row. To avoid thi phenomenon, zero i replaced by a very mall number (ay є).

Example#5

Example#5 Determine the tability of the ytem having a characteritic equation given below; The Routh array i hown in the table; Where There are TWO ign change due to the large negative number in the firt column, Therefore the ytem i untable, and two root of the equation lie in the right half of the -plane.

Example#6 Determine the range of parameter K for which the ytem i untable. The Routh array of the above characteritic equation i hown below; Where Therefore, for any value of K greater than zero, the ytem i untable. Alo, becaue the lat term in the firt column i equal to K, a negative value of K will reult in an untable ytem. Conequently, the ytem i untable for all value of gain K.

Cae-I: Stability via Revere Coefficient (Phillip, 1991). A polynomial that ha the reciprocal root of the original polynomial ha it root ditributed the ame right half-plane, left half plane, or imaginary axi becaue taking the reciprocal of the root value doe not move it to another region. If we can find the polynomial that ha the reciprocal root of the original, it i poible that the Routh table for the new polynomial will not have a zero in the firt column. The polynomial with reciprocal root i a polynomial with the coefficient written in revere order. Thi method i uually computationally eaier than the epilon method.

Determine the tability of the of the cloed-loop tranfer function; Table-1: The complete Routh table i formed by uing the denominator of the characteritic equation T(). Table-2: how the firt column of Table-1 along with the reulting ign for choice of ε poitive and ε negative. A zero appear only in the firt column (the 3 row). Next replace the zero by a mall number, ε, and complete the table. Aume a ign, poitive or negative, for the quantity ε. When quantity ε i either poitive or negative, in both cae the ign in the firt column of Routh table i change twice. Hence, the ytem i untable and ha two pole in the right half-plane.

Example-7: Determine the tability of the cloed-loop tranfer function; Firt write a polynomial that ha the reciprocal root of the denominator of T(). Thi polynomial i formed by writing the denominator of T() in revere order. Hence, The Routh table i Since there are TWO ign change, the ytem i untable and ha TWO right-halfplane pole. Thi i the ame a the reult obtained in the previou Example. Notice that Table doe not have a zero in the firt column.

Cae-II: Entire Row i Zero. Sometime while making a Routh table, we find that an entire row conit of zero. Thi happen becaue there i an even polynomial that i a factor of the original polynomial. Thi cae mut be handled differently from the cae of a zero in only the firt column of a row.

Cae-II: Entire Row i Zero. The characteritic equation q() of the ytem i q = 3 + 2 2 + 4 + 8

Example-8: Determine the tability of the ytem. The characteritic equation q() of the ytem i Where K i an adjutable loop gain. The Routh array i then; For a table ytem, the value of K mut be;

Example-8: Determine the tability of the ytem. Alo, when K = 8, we obtain a row of zero (Cae-II). The auxiliary polynomial, U(), i the equation of the row preceding the row of Zero. The U() in thi cae, obtained from the 2 row. The order of the auxiliary polynomial i alway even and indicate the number of ymmetrical root pair.

Example-8: Determine the tability of the ytem. The auxiliary polynomial, U(), can be obtain a;

Example#9 Conider the following characteritic equation. Determine the range of K for tability.

To download thi lecture viit http://imtiazhuainkalwar.weebly.com/ END OF LECTURES-19-20