Steinberg s Conjecture is false

Similar documents
Solutions to Homework 5

Outline. 1 Introduction. 2 Min-Cost Spanning Trees. 4 Example

Cycles and Simple Cycles. Paths and Simple Paths. Trees. Problem: There is No Completely Standard Terminology!

THE CORRELATION DECAY (CD) TREE AND STRONG SPATIAL MIXING IN MULTI-SPIN SYSTEMS

Graphs. Graphs. Graphs: Basic Terminology. Directed Graphs. Dr Papalaskari 1

Outline. Computer Science 331. Computation of Min-Cost Spanning Trees. Costs of Spanning Trees in Weighted Graphs

12/3/12. Outline. Part 10. Graphs. Circuits. Euler paths/circuits. Euler s bridge problem (Bridges of Konigsberg Problem)

5/9/13. Part 10. Graphs. Outline. Circuits. Introduction Terminology Implementing Graphs

The University of Sydney MATH2969/2069. Graph Theory Tutorial 5 (Week 12) Solutions 2008

Algorithmic and NP-Completeness Aspects of a Total Lict Domination Number of a Graph

Graph Isomorphism. Graphs - II. Cayley s Formula. Planar Graphs. Outline. Is K 5 planar? The number of labeled trees on n nodes is n n-2

Planar Upward Drawings

Paths. Connectivity. Euler and Hamilton Paths. Planar graphs.

, each of which is a tree, and whose roots r 1. , respectively, are children of r. Data Structures & File Management

COMPLEXITY OF COUNTING PLANAR TILINGS BY TWO BARS

0.1. Exercise 1: the distances between four points in a graph

Garnir Polynomial and their Properties

LR(0) Analysis. LR(0) Analysis

MAT3707. Tutorial letter 201/1/2017 DISCRETE MATHEMATICS: COMBINATORICS. Semester 1. Department of Mathematical Sciences MAT3707/201/1/2017

Math 61 : Discrete Structures Final Exam Instructor: Ciprian Manolescu. You have 180 minutes.

Examples and applications on SSSP and MST

CS 461, Lecture 17. Today s Outline. Example Run

12. Traffic engineering

CS553 Lecture Register Allocation I 3

Minimum Spanning Trees

Exam 1 Solution. CS 542 Advanced Data Structures and Algorithms 2/14/2013

MA1506 Tutorial 2 Solutions. Question 1. (1a) 1 ) y x. e x. 1 exp (in general, Integrating factor is. ye dx. So ) (1b) e e. e c.

Final Exam Solutions

Evans, Lipson, Wallace, Greenwood

Outline. Circuits. Euler paths/circuits 4/25/12. Part 10. Graphs. Euler s bridge problem (Bridges of Konigsberg Problem)

Graphs. CSC 1300 Discrete Structures Villanova University. Villanova CSC Dr Papalaskari

1 Introduction to Modulo 7 Arithmetic

L I R M M O N T P E L L I E R

Week 3: Connected Subgraphs

ECE COMBINATIONAL BUILDING BLOCKS - INVEST 13 DECODERS AND ENCODERS

N1.1 Homework Answers

Present state Next state Q + M N

Codes on Planar Graphs

1 Random graphs with specified degrees

V={A,B,C,D,E} E={ (A,D),(A,E),(B,D), (B,E),(C,D),(C,E)}

CS 491 G Combinatorial Optimization

An undirected graph G = (V, E) V a set of vertices E a set of unordered edges (v,w) where v, w in V

(2) If we multiplied a row of B by λ, then the value is also multiplied by λ(here lambda could be 0). namely

10. EXTENDING TRACTABILITY

On spanning trees and cycles of multicolored point sets with few intersections

Numbering Boundary Nodes

V={A,B,C,D,E} E={ (A,D),(A,E),(B,D), (B,E),(C,D),(C,E)}

CSC Design and Analysis of Algorithms. Example: Change-Making Problem

A 4-state solution to the Firing Squad Synchronization Problem based on hybrid rule 60 and 102 cellular automata

CS 241 Analysis of Algorithms

Combinatorial Networks Week 1, March 11-12

Linked-List Implementation. Linked-lists for two sets. Multiple Operations. UNION Implementation. An Application of Disjoint-Set 1/9/2014

Constructive Geometric Constraint Solving

QUESTIONS BEGIN HERE!

CSE 373. Graphs 1: Concepts, Depth/Breadth-First Search reading: Weiss Ch. 9. slides created by Marty Stepp

G. Gambosi (*), J. Ne~etgil (**), M. Talamo (*)

1. Determine whether or not the following binary relations are equivalence relations. Be sure to justify your answers.

Searching Linked Lists. Perfect Skip List. Building a Skip List. Skip List Analysis (1) Assume the list is sorted, but is stored in a linked list.

QUESTIONS BEGIN HERE!

Edge-Triggered D Flip-flop. Formal Analysis. Fundamental-Mode Sequential Circuits. D latch: How do flip-flops work?

Thickness and Colorability of Geometric Graphs

Section 10.4 Connectivity (up to paths and isomorphism, not including)

NEW APPLICATIONS OF THE ABEL-LIOUVILLE FORMULA

Further Results on Pair Sum Graphs

learning objectives learn what graphs are in mathematical terms learn how to represent graphs in computers learn about typical graph algorithms

The Equitable Dominating Graph

# 1 ' 10 ' 100. Decimal point = 4 hundred. = 6 tens (or sixty) = 5 ones (or five) = 2 tenths. = 7 hundredths.

CSE 373: More on graphs; DFS and BFS. Michael Lee Wednesday, Feb 14, 2018

Where k is either given or determined from the data and c is an arbitrary constant.

ON RIGHT(LEFT) DUO PO-SEMIGROUPS. S. K. Lee and K. Y. Park

Mathematics 1110H Calculus I: Limits, derivatives, and Integrals Trent University, Summer 2018 Solutions to the Actual Final Examination

Chapter Finding Small Vertex Covers. Extending the Limits of Tractability. Coping With NP-Completeness. Vertex Cover

Trees as operads. Lecture A formalism of trees

ECE602 Exam 1 April 5, You must show ALL of your work for full credit.

First derivative analysis

Implementing the Law of Sines to solve SAS triangles

Seven-Segment Display Driver

b. How many ternary words of length 23 with eight 0 s, nine 1 s and six 2 s?

Solutions for HW11. Exercise 34. (a) Use the recurrence relation t(g) = t(g e) + t(g/e) to count the number of spanning trees of v 1

COMP108 Algorithmic Foundations

Digital Signal Processing, Fall 2006

Graph Theory. Vertices. Vertices are also known as nodes, points and (in social networks) as actors, agents or players.

CS200: Graphs. Graphs. Directed Graphs. Graphs/Networks Around Us. What can this represent? Sometimes we want to represent directionality:

Derangements and Applications

S i m p l i f y i n g A l g e b r a SIMPLIFYING ALGEBRA.

Chapter 1. Analysis of a M/G/1/K Queue without Vacations

Worksheet: Taylor Series, Lagrange Error Bound ilearnmath.net

cycle that does not cross any edges (including its own), then it has at least

Graphs and Graph Searches

Complete Solutions for MATH 3012 Quiz 2, October 25, 2011, WTT

BINOMIAL COEFFICIENTS INVOLVING INFINITE POWERS OF PRIMES. 1. Statement of results

BINOMIAL COEFFICIENTS INVOLVING INFINITE POWERS OF PRIMES

The second condition says that a node α of the tree has exactly n children if the arity of its label is n.

PROBLEM SET Problem 1.

Multiple Short Term Infusion Homework # 5 PHA 5127

Why the Junction Tree Algorithm? The Junction Tree Algorithm. Clique Potential Representation. Overview. Chris Williams 1.

CLONES IN 3-CONNECTED FRAME MATROIDS

Announcements. Not graphs. These are Graphs. Applications of Graphs. Graph Definitions. Graphs & Graph Algorithms. A6 released today: Risk

Square of Hamilton cycle in a random graph

Construction of asymmetric orthogonal arrays of strength three via a replacement method

Transcription:

Stinrg s Conjtur is als arxiv:1604.05108v2 [math.co] 19 Apr 2016 Vinnt Cohn-Aa Mihal Hig Danil Král Zhntao Li Estan Salgao Astrat Stinrg onjtur in 1976 that vry planar graph with no yls o lngth our or iv is 3-oloral. W isprov this onjtur. 1 Introution On o major opn prolms on olorings o planar graphs is Stinrg s Conjtur rom 1976. Th onjtur assrts that vry planar graph with no yls o lngth our or iv is 3-oloral. This prolm has n attrating a sustantial amount o attntion among graph thorists, s [4, Stion 7]. It is also on o th six graph thory prolms rank with th 4-star (highst) importan in th Opn Prolm Garn [1]. As a possil approah towars proving th onjtur, Erős in 1991 (s [12]) suggst to trmin th smallst k suh that vry planar graph with no yls o lngth 4,...,k is 3-oloral. Boroin t al. [8], improving up on [2,11], show that k 7, i.., vry planar graph with no yls o lngth our, iv, six or svn is 3-oloral. Many othr rlaxations o th onjtur hav n stalish,.g. [3,6,9,14]. On th othr han, th onjtur isknown toals inthlist oloringstting [13]. Wrr thrar or urthr rsults on th onjtur an othr prolms rlat to olorings o planar graphs to [4, 10]. Départmnt Inormatiqu, UMR CNRS 8548, Éol Normal Supériur, Paris, Fran. E-mail: {vohn,zhntao}@i.ns.r. Dpartmnt o Computr Sin, Univrsity o Warwik, Covntry CV4 7AL, UK. E-mail: m.hig@warwik.a.uk. Th work o this author was support y th Lvrhulm Trust 2014 Philip Lvrhulm Priz o th thir author. Mathmatis Institut, DIMAP an Dpartmnt o Computr Sin, Univrsity o Warwik, Covntry CV4 7AL, UK. E-mail:.kral@warwik.a.uk. Th work o this author was support y th Lvrhulm Trust 2014 Philip Lvrhulm Priz. Éol Polythniqu, Paris, Fran, an Pontiiia Univrsia Católia Chil, Santiago, Chil. E-mail: asalgaovalnzula@gmail.om. This rsarhwas on uring th stay o th son, thir an ith o th authors at Éol Normal Supériur in Paris. 1

a g k n m o l h j i Figur 1: Th graph G 1 analyz in Lmma 1. W isprov Stinrg s Conjtur y onstruting a planar graph with no yls o lngth our or iv that is not 3-oloral. This also isprovs Strong Boraux Conjtur rom [9] an Novosiirsk 3-Color Conjtur rom [5]. Conjtur 1 (Strong Boraux Conjtur). Evry planar graph with no pair o yls o lngth thr sharing an g an with no yl o lngth iv is 3- oloral. Conjtur 2 (Novosiirsk 3-Color Conjtur). Evry planar graph without a yl o lngth thr sharing an g with a yl o lngth thr or iv is 3- oloral. W woul lik to rmark that w hav not tri to minimiz th numr o vrtis in our onstrution; w ar atually awar o th xistn o smallr ountrxampls (th smallst on with 85 vrtis) ut w i to prsnt th on that is th simplst to analyz among thos that w hav oun. 2 Countrxampl Our onstrution has thr stps. In ah o ths stps, w onstrut a partiular planar graph with no yls o lngth our or iv that has som aitional proprtis. Th nxt two lmmas prsnt th irst two stps o th onstrution. Lmma 1. Th graph G 1 that is pit in Figur 1 has no yls o lngth our or iv an thr is no 3-oloring that woul assign th sam olor to all th thr vrtis a, an. In aition, th istan twn a an is thr, twn a an is thr, an twn an is our. 2

a a G 1 G 1 G 1 Figur 2: Th graph G 2 analyz in Lmma 2. Th atual graph is rawn on th lt; its astrat strutur using th graph G 1 is givn on th right. Th thr ontat vrtis a, an ar rawn with ol irls. Proo. It is asy to hk that G 1 ontains no yl o lngth our or iv, th istan twn a an is thr, twn a an is thr, an twn an is our. Suppos that G 1 has a 3-oloring suh that all th thr vrtis a, an hav th sam olor, say γ. Th othr two olors must us in an altrnating way to olor th vrtis,,, g, h an i. This implis that th vrtis j, k an l hav th olor γ. Hn, th two olors irnt rom γ must us to olor th vrtis m, n an o, whih is impossil sin ths thr vrtis orm a triangl. Lmma 2. Th graph G 2 that is pit in Figur 2 has no yls o lngth our or iv an thr is no 3-oloring that woul assign th sam olor to all th thr vrtis a, an. In aition, th istan twn any pairs o th vrtis a, an is our. Proo. Not that th graph G 2 onsists o thr opis o th graph G 1 past togthr as pit in Figur 2. W start y hking that th istan twn th vrtis a an is our (th ass o th othr two pairs ar symmtri). Sin a an ar join y a path o lngth our, thir istan is at most our. Lmma 1 implis that thr is no path o lngth lss than our insi th opy o G 1 ontaining a an. On th othr han, any path passing through mor than on opy o G 1 must hav lngth at last thr insi ah travrs opy o G 1, so its total lngth annot lss than six. W onlu that th istan twn a an is our. W nxt hk that G 2 has no yl o lngth our or iv. By Lmma 1, no yl insi on o th opis o G 1 has lngth our or iv. Sin th istan 3

G 2 G 2 G 2 a G 2 Figur 3: Th graph G onstrut in th proo o Thorm 3. Th gray aras rprsnt th graph rom Figur 2. twn any two o th ontat vrtis o th opis o G 1 (th vrtis us to glu th opis togthr) is at last thr y Lmma 1, th lngth o any yl passing through two or thr o th opis is at last six. Th only yl that os not ontain an g insi a opy o G 1 is th yl an its lngth is thr. Thror, G 2 has no yl o lngth our or iv. It rmains to hk that G 2 has no 3-oloring suh that th vrtis a, an gt th sam olor. Suppos that G 2 has a 3-oloring suh that th vrtis a, an riv th sam olor, say γ. By Lmma 1, th olor o any o th vrtis, an is irnt rom γ. Howvr, this is impossil sin th vrtis, an orm a triangl an thr ar only thr olors in total. Hn, G 2 has no 3-oloring suh that th vrtis a, an woul gt th sam olor. W ar now ray to provi th ountrxampl onstrution. Thorm 3. Thr xists a planar graph with no yls o lngth our or iv that is not 3-oloral. Proo. Consir th graph G otain y taking our opis o th graph G 2 rom Lmma 2 an pasting thm togthr with aitional vrtis, an in th way pit in Figur 3. W irst argu that G has no yl o lngth our or iv. By Lmma 2, thr is no yl o lngth our or iv insi a singl opy o G 2. Any yl ontaining an g insi a opy o G 2 that is not ully ontain insi th opy must ontain at last our gs insi th onsir opy o G 2, sin th istan twn any two o th ontat vrtis o G 2 is our y Lmma 2. Sin suh a yl must ontain at last two gs outsi th opy o G 2, its lngth must at last six. Hn, thr is no yl with lngth our or iv that ontains an g insi a opy o G 2. Osrv that thr ar xatly 4

thr yls not ontaining an g insi any opy o G 2 an ths ar triangls, an. Thror, G has no yl o lngth our or iv. Suppos that G has a 3-oloring an lt γ th olor assign to th vrtx a. Sin th vrtis o th triangl must assign all thr olors an th olor o is not γ, ithr or is olor with γ. By symmtry, w an assum that th olor o is γ. Sin th vrtis a, an ar ontat vrtis o a opy o G 2, th olor o is not γ y Lmma 2. Similarly, sin th vrtis a, an ar ontat vrtis o a opy o G 2, th olor o is also not γ. Hn, non o th vrtis, an (not th vrtx is ajant to a) has th olor γ, whih is impossil sin th vrtis, an orm a triangl. W onlu that th graph G has no 3-oloring. Aknowlgmnt Th authors woul lik to thank Zněk Dvořák or his ommnts an insights on a omputr-assist approah towars a possil solution o Stinrg s Conjtur. Rrns [1] Opn Prolm Garn, http://www.opnprolmgarn.org/. [2] H. L. Aott, B. Zhou: On small as in 4-ritial graphs, Ars Comin. 32 (1991), 203-207. [3] O. V. Boroin: Strutural proprtis o plan graphs without ajant triangls an an appliation to 3-olorings, J. Graph Thory 21 (1996), 183 186. [4] O. V. Boroin: Colorings o plan graphs: A survy, Disrt Math. 313 (2013), 517 539. [5] O. V. Boroin, A. N. Glov, T. R. Jnsn, an A. Raspau: Planar graphs without triangls ajant to yls o lngth rom 3 to 9 ar 3-oloral, Si. Elktron. Mat. Izv. 3 (2006), 428 440. [6] O. V. Boroin, A. N. Glov, M. Montassir, an A. Raspau: Planar graphs without 5- an 7-yls an without ajant triangls ar 3-oloral, J. Comin. Thory Sr. B 99 (2009), 668 673. [7] O. V. Boroin, A. N. Glov, an A. Raspau: Planar graphs without triangls ajant to yls o lngth rom 4 to 7 ar 3-oloral, Disrt Math. 310 (2010), 2584-2594. 5

[8] O. V. Boroin, A. N. Glov, A. Raspau, an M. R. Salavatipour: Planar graphs without yls o lngth rom 4 to 7 ar 3-oloral, J. Comin. Thory Sr. B 93 (2005), 303 331. [9] O. V. Boroin an A. Raspau: A suiint onition or planar graphs to 3-oloral, J. Comin. Thory Sr. B 88 (2003), 17 27. [10] T. R. Jnsn, B. Tot: Graph oloring prolms, John Wily & Sons, 1995. [11] D. P. Sanrs, Y. Zhao: A not on th thr olor prolm, Graphs Comin. 11 (1995), 91 94. [12] R. Stinrg: Th stat o th thr olor prolm, quo vais, graph thory?, Ann. Disrt Math. 55 (1993), 211-248. [13] M. Voigt: A non-3-hoosal planar graph without yls o lngth 4 an 5, Disrt Math. 307 (2007), 1013 1015. [14] B. Xu: On 3-oloral plan graphs without 5- an 7-yls, J. Comin. Thory Sr. B 96 (2006), 958 963. 6