Geotechnical Modeling Issues

Similar documents
Effective stress analysis of pile foundations in liquefiable soil

2004 OpenSees User Workshop. OpenSees. Geotechnical Capabilities and Applications. (U.C. San Diego) Roadmap

2005 OpenSees Symposium OpenSees

An Overview of Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering

S Wang Beca Consultants, Wellington, NZ (formerly University of Auckland, NZ)

IN SITU TESTING TECHNOLOGY FOR FOUNDATION & EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING. Wesley Spang, Ph.D., P.E. AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc.

Developing software to evaluate the liquefaction potential by using 2D numerical modeling: Applications.

2D Liquefaction Analysis for Bridge Abutment

Dynamic behavior of turbine foundation considering full interaction among facility, structure and soil

Seismic Responses of Liquefiable Sandy Ground with Silt Layers

IZMIT BAY BRIDGE SOUTH APPROACH VIADUCT: SEISMIC DESIGN NEXT TO THE NORTH ANATOLIAN FAULT

LIQUEFACTION OF EARTH EMBANKMENT DAMS TWO CASE HISTORIES: (1) LIQUEFACTION OF THE EMBANKMENT SOILS, AND (2) LIQUEFACTION OF THE FOUNDATIONS SOILS

Liquefaction and Foundations

Session 2: Triggering of Liquefaction

Centrifuge Shaking Table Tests and FEM Analyses of RC Pile Foundation and Underground Structure

Geotechnical Elements and Models in OpenSees

Numerical simulation of inclined piles in liquefiable soils

Modeling of Cyclic Load-Deformation Behavior of Shallow Foundations Supporting Rocking Shear Walls. Sivapalan Gajan. Advisor: Bruce Kutter

ON THE PREDICTION OF EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS FROM TWO PILE TESTS UNDER FORCED VIBRATIONS

SEISMIC RESPONSE OF A SANDY STRATUM WITH A SILT LAYER UNDER STRONG GROUND MOTIONS

NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF THE INELASTIC SEISMIC RESPONSE OF RC STRUCTURES WITH ENERGY DISSIPATORS

NZ Transport Agency s Detailed Design Guidance for Piled Bridges at Sites Prone to Liquefaction and Lateral Spreading

EXAMPLE OF PILED FOUNDATIONS

Module 6 LIQUEFACTION (Lectures 27 to 32)

INELASTIC RESPONSES OF LONG BRIDGES TO ASYNCHRONOUS SEISMIC INPUTS

Damping from bearing hysteresis in railway bridges

14 Geotechnical Hazards

Seminar Bridge Design with Eurocodes

Back-Calculation of Winkler Foundation Parameters for Dynamic Analysis of Piles from Field Test Data

Seismic Analysis of Soil-pile Interaction under Various Soil Conditions

STUDY OF THE BEHAVIOR OF PILE GROUPS IN LIQUEFIED SOILS

PILE FOUNDATION RESPONSE DUE TO SOIL LATERAL SPREADING DURING HYOGO-KEN NANBU EARTHQUAKE

A STUDY ON DAMAGE TO STEEL PIPE PILE FOUNDATION ON RECLAIMED LAND DURING HYOGO-KEN-NANBU EARTHQUAKE

SFSI in shallow foundation earthquake response

Model tests and FE-modelling of dynamic soil-structure interaction

Theory of Shear Strength

Piles in Lateral Spreading due to Liquefaction: A Physically Simplified Method Versus Centrifuge Experiments

Reinforced Soil Structures Reinforced Soil Walls. Prof K. Rajagopal Department of Civil Engineering IIT Madras, Chennai

INFLUENCE OF SOIL NONLINEARITY AND LIQUEFACTION ON DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF PILE GROUPS

Numerical Modelling of Dynamic Earth Force Transmission to Underground Structures

BENCHMARK LINEAR FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF LATERALLY LOADED SINGLE PILE USING OPENSEES & COMPARISON WITH ANALYTICAL SOLUTION

Spread footing settlement and rotation analysis

3-D Numerical simulation of shake-table tests on piles subjected to lateral spreading

Landslide FE Stability Analysis

NON LINEAR SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTION : IMPACT ON THE SEISMIC RESPONSE OF STRUTURES. Alain PECKER

Static Pile Head Impedance using 3D Nonlinear FEM Analysis

J. Paul Guyer, P.E., R.A.

Interpretation of Pile Integrity Test (PIT) Results

Characterizing Pile Foundations for Evaluation of Performance Based Seismic Design of Critical Lifeline Structures. W. D.

Nonlinear Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Bridges under Earthquakes

Module 8 SEISMIC SLOPE STABILITY (Lectures 37 to 40)

Nonlinear Seismic Analysis of Buried Pipelines During Liquefaction

Liquefaction-Induced Lateral Spreading Misko Cubrinovski University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand

Geotechnical Aspects of the Seismic Update to the ODOT Bridge Design Manual. Stuart Edwards, P.E Geotechnical Consultant Workshop

Design Procedures For Dynamically Loaded Foundations

Gapping effects on the lateral stiffness of piles in cohesive soil

NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF A PILE SUBJECTED TO LATERAL LOADS

3-D DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF TAIYUAN FLY ASH DAM

Evaluation of Geotechnical Hazards

Seismic Design of a Hydraulic Fill Dam by Nonlinear Time History Method

IAEA SAFETY STANDARDS Geotechnical Aspects of Site Evaluation and Foundations in NPPs, NS-G-3.6

PILE DESIGN IN LIQUEFYING SOIL

GEOTECHNICAL SEISMIC HAZARDS

Module 9 : Foundation on rocks. Content

Numerical Modeling of Interface Between Soil and Pile to Account for Loss of Contact during Seismic Excitation

Support Idealizations

EN Eurocode 7. Section 3 Geotechnical Data Section 6 Spread Foundations. Trevor L.L. Orr Trinity College Dublin Ireland.

Dynamic Analysis Contents - 1

DRAFT ONONDAGA LAKE CAPPING AND DREDGE AREA AND DEPTH INITIAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL H.4 SEISMIC SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSES

Chapter (11) Pile Foundations

FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF ARKANSAS TEST SERIES PILE #2 USING OPENSEES (WITH LPILE COMPARISON)

Determination of Dynamic p-y Curves for Pile Foundations Under Seismic Loading

Theory of Shear Strength

Seismic Response Analysis of Structure Supported by Piles Subjected to Very Large Earthquake Based on 3D-FEM

Chapter 6 Seismic Design of Bridges. Kazuhiko Kawashima Tokyo Institute of Technology

NON-LINEAR ANALYSIS OF SOIL-PILE-STRUCTURE INTERACTION UNDER SEISMIC LOADS

Cubzac-les-Ponts Experimental Embankments on Soft Clay

EFFECTIVE STRESS ANALYSES OF TWO SITES WITH DIFFERENT EXTENT OF LIQUEFACTION DURING EAST JAPAN EARTHQUAKE

EVALUATING RADIATION DAMPING OF SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS ON NONLINEAR SOIL MEDIUM FOR SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION ANALYSIS OF BRIDGES

Tower Cranes & Foundations The Interface & CIRIA C654 Stuart Marchand C.Eng. FICE FIStructE Director Wentworth House Partnership

Numerical analysis of effect of mitigation measures on seismic performance of a liquefiable tailings dam foundation

Seismic Evaluation of Tailing Storage Facility

Finite Deformation Analysis of Dynamic Behavior of Embankment on Liquefiable Sand Deposit Considering Pore Water Flow and Migration

R.M.HARW & ASSOCIATES LTD. GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED BRIDGE SITE. HELAVA CREEKl MILE MACKENZIE HIGHWAY E-2510 OCTOBER 16, 1973

Neutral Plane Method for Drag Force of Deep Foundations and the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications

INTI COLLEGE MALAYSIA

Site Response Using Effective Stress Analysis

MATERIAL MODELS FOR CRUMB RUBBER AND TDA. California State University, Chico

Instructor : Dr. Jehad Hamad. Chapter (7)

USER S MANUAL 1D Seismic Site Response Analysis Example University of California: San Diego August 30, 2017

The Preliminary Study of the Impact of Liquefaction on Water Pipes

Foundations on Deep Alluvial Soils

Comparison of Structural Models for Seismic Analysis of Multi-Storey Frame Buildings

Soil Properties - II

BEARING CAPACITY SHALLOW AND DEEP FOUNDATIONS

SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION, WAVE PASSAGE EFFECTS AND ASSYMETRY IN NONLINEAR SOIL RESPONSE

Dynamic Response of EPS Blocks /soil Sandwiched Wall/embankment

PRACTICAL THREE-DIMENSIONAL EFFECTIVE STRESS ANALYSIS CONSIDERING CYCLIC MOBILITY BEHAVIOR

SEISMIC FRAGILITY CURVES FOR A TYPICAL HIGHWAY BRIDGE IN CHARLESTON, SC CONSIDERING SOIL- STRUCTURE INTERACTION AND LIQUEFACTION EFFECTS

Dynamics: Domain Reduction Method. Case study

Transcription:

Nonlinear Analysis of Viaducts and Overpasses Geotechnical Modeling Issues Steve Kramer Pedro Arduino Hyung-Suk Shin University of Washington

The Problem Approach Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Bridge Bridge Abutment Soil Soil Soil Soil Piers Piers Soil Soil Approach Foundations Soil Soil Abutment Soil Soil Soil Soil

Reality Three-dimensional problem Soil Bridge Motions Finite extent Short structures - overpass Long structures - viaduct Soil behavior Nonlinear, inelastic Spatial variability Quantity / quality of data

Reality Soil-Foundation-Structure Interaction (SFSI) Effects on system stiffness Effects on system damping Effects on displacements Abutments Stiffness Failure Shallow foundations Deep foundations Time-dependent soil behavior Pore pressure generation Pore pressure dissipation Delayed failure

Three-dimensional problem Soil Bridge Motions Three-dimensional Three-dimensional OpenSees OpenSees analyses analyses Possible Possible using using brick brick elements elements Very Very long long run run times times How How to to handle handle foundations? foundations? Continuum Continuum representation representation Discrete Discrete (spring) (spring) representation representation 3-D Model

Three-dimensional problem Soil Bridge Motions 2-D Model Two-dimensional Two-dimensional OpenSees OpenSees analyses analyses Quad Quad elements elements for for soil soil Much Much shorter shorter run run times times Discrete Discrete (spring) (spring) representation representation of of foundations foundations Horizontal Horizontal and and vertical vertical input input motions motions Separate Separate analysis analysis for for out-of-plane out-of-plane response response

Three-dimensional problem Soil Bridge Motions Quasi-3D Quasi-3D OpenSees OpenSees analyses analyses Perpendicular Perpendicular 1-D 1-D soil soil columns columns Much Much shorter shorter run run times times Discrete Discrete (spring) (spring) representation representation of of foundations foundations Horizontal Horizontal and and vertical vertical input input motions motions Decoupled Decoupled response response at at different different foundation foundation locations, locations, and and in in different different directions directions

Finite extent can be important for long structures Incoherency Incoherency Due Due to to variable variable soil soil conditions conditions Due Due to to wave wave passage passage effect effect

Soil behavior Nonlinear, inelastic Spatial variability Quantity / quality of data Soil Soil Models Models Many Many parameters parameters may may be be required required Parameter Parameter identification identification may may require require numerous numerous tests tests Standard Standard parameters parameters sets sets available available for for Elgamal Elgamal models models Pressure-independent model model Pressure-dependent Pressure-dependent model model

Soil behavior Nonlinear, inelastic Spatial variability Quantity / quality of data Random Random Fields Fields Generate Generate multiple multiple realizations realizations of of anticipated anticipated soil soil properties properties Correct Correct distribution distribution (µ, (µ, σ) σ) Correct Correct auto-correlation auto-correlation function function Multiple Multiple analyses analyses required required May May be be time-consuming time-consuming

Soil behavior Nonlinear, inelastic Spatial variability Range of permanent Quantity / quality of data displacements Mean permanent displacement Random Random Fields Fields Generate Generate multiple multiple realizations realizations of of anticipated anticipated soil soil properties properties Correct Correct distribution distribution (µ, (µ, σ) σ) Correct Correct auto-correlation auto-correlation function function Multiple Multiple analyses analyses required required May May be be time-consuming time-consuming Distribution of permanent displacements

Soil behavior Nonlinear, inelastic Spatial variability Quantity / quality of data Subsurface Subsurface Investigation Investigation Soil Soil sampled sampled at at discrete discrete number number of of locations locations Laboratory Laboratory tests tests affected affected by by many many factors factors Disturbance Disturbance Stress Stress path path effects effects

Soil behavior Nonlinear, inelastic Spatial variability Quantity / quality of data Subsurface Subsurface Investigation Investigation Soil Soil sampled sampled at at discrete discrete number number of of locations locations Laboratory Laboratory tests tests affected affected by by many many factors factors Disturbance Disturbance Stress Stress path path effects effects Insitu Insitu tests tests

Soil behavior Nonlinear, inelastic Spatial variability Quantity / quality of data Correlations Correlations Parameter Parameter measured measured in in insitu insitu test test correlated correlated to to property property of of interest interest Correlations Correlations available, available, but but based based on on scattered scattered data data Leads Leads to to uncertainty uncertainty in in estimated estimated property property value value

Soil-Foundation-Structure Interaction Shallow foundations Deep foundations Continuum analysis 3-D 3-D modeling modeling Small Small elements elements required required in in nearfielfield near- Interface Interface elements elements required required Sliding Sliding Gapping Gapping Larger Larger elements elements OK OK at at greater greater distances distances Transmitting Transmitting boundaries boundaries required required for for radiation radiation damping damping

Soil-Foundation-Structure Interaction Shallow foundations Deep foundations Continuum analysis 3-D 3-D modeling modeling Small Small elements elements required required in in nearfielfield near- Interface Interface elements elements required required Sliding Sliding Gapping Gapping Larger Larger elements elements OK OK at at greater greater distances distances Transmitting Transmitting boundaries boundaries required required for for radiation radiation damping damping

Soil-Foundation-Structure Interaction Shallow foundations Deep foundations Continuum analysis

Soil-Foundation-Structure Interaction Shallow foundations Deep foundations Discrete analysis nonlinear springs and dashpot Discrete Discrete interaction interaction elements elements Springs Springs to to represent represent soil soil stiffness stiffness Dashpots Dashpots to to represent represent damping damping Hysteretic Hysteretic damping damping in in near-field near-field Radiation Radiation damping damping in in far-field far-field Must Must account account for for gapping gapping Must Must account account for for pore pore pressure pressure effects effects Soil profile p-y spring t-z spring q-z spring

Abutment models Stiffness modeling abutment module Bridge module Discrete Discrete interaction interaction elements elements Nonlinear Nonlinear springs springs Stiffness Stiffness Strength Strength Interface Interface elements elements Bearing Bearing elements elements Bearing pad module Pile foundation module Soil module

Abutment models Stiffness modeling Discrete Discrete interaction interaction elements elements Nonlinear Nonlinear springs springs Stiffness Stiffness Strength Strength Interface Interface elements elements Bearing Bearing elements elements

Abutment models Stiffness modeling Strength modeling Discrete Discrete interaction interaction elements elements Nonlinear Nonlinear springs springs Stiffness Stiffness Strength Strength Interface Interface elements elements Bearing Bearing elements elements

Abutment models Stiffness modeling Strength modeling Discrete Discrete interaction interaction elements elements Nonlinear Nonlinear springs springs Stiffness Stiffness Strength Strength Interface Interface elements elements Bearing Bearing elements elements

Abutment models Stiffness modeling Strength modeling Discrete Discrete interaction interaction elements elements Nonlinear Nonlinear springs springs Stiffness Stiffness Strength Strength Interface Interface elements elements Bearing Bearing elements elements Complex failure surface geometry

Time-dependent soil behavior Pore pressure generation Pore pressure redistribution Pore pressure dissipation Effective Effective stress stress analysis analysis Constitutive Constitutive model model Modulus Modulus degradation degradation Phase Phase transformation transformation Hysteretic Hysteretic damping damping High frequency Low frequency High frequency

Time-dependent soil behavior Pore pressure generation Pore pressure redistribution Pore pressure dissipation Effective Effective stress stress analysis analysis Constitutive Constitutive model model Modulus Modulus degradation degradation Phase Phase transformation transformation Hysteretic Hysteretic damping damping Diffusion Diffusion equation equation solution solution

Time-dependent soil behavior Pore pressure generation Pore pressure redistribution Pore pressure dissipation Effective Effective stress stress analysis analysis Constitutive Constitutive model model Modulus Modulus degradation degradation Phase Phase transformation transformation Hysteretic Hysteretic damping damping Diffusion Diffusion equation equation solution solution Post-liquefaction Post-liquefaction settlement settlement

Geotechnical Modeling - Example Example: Bridge on liquefiable soil deposit Five-span bridge Approach embankments Variable thickness of liquefiable soil Clay Liquefiable sand Dense sand

Geotechnical Modeling - Example reinforced conrete column (column A 4 ft) prestressed reinforced concrete bridge spring connection abutment simplified abutment (roller or spring) steel pipe pile (8 ft diameter)

Geotechnical Modeling - Example Horizontal displacements 95 cm 200 cm Vertical displacements 26 cm 70 cm

Geotechnical Modeling - Example Ground failure Lateral spreading Settlement Different form of loading on bridge

Geotechnical Modeling - Example 50% 50% // 50 50 yrs yrs 10 10 motions Scaled Scaled so so that that mean mean S a (T a (T o ) o ) = target target S a (T a (T o ) o )

Geotechnical Modeling - Example 10% 10% // 50 50 yrs yrs 10 10 motions Scaled Scaled so so that that mean mean S a (T a (T o ) o ) = target target S a (T a (T o ) o )

Geotechnical Modeling - Example 2% 2% // 50 50 yrs yrs 10 10 motions Scaled Scaled so so that that mean mean S a (T a (T o ) o ) = target target S a (T a (T o ) o )

Geotechnical Modeling - Example Ground surface settlement

Geotechnical Modeling - Example Ground surface settlement

Geotechnical Modeling - Example Ground surface settlement Max heave: 29 cm Max settlement: 82 cm

Geotechnical Modeling Conclusions: Many complex geotechnical aspects to complete modeling of bridge-soil system OpenSees has capabilities for addressing nearly all of these in fairly rigorous fashion OpenSees is unique in level of rigor with which soil and structural response can be modeled in coupled manner OpenSees calculations are time-consuming for rigorous model Several approximations can be made w/r/t dimensions, geometry for soil model, foundation models Results of analyses provide insight into response, damage mechanisms