T-Rough Fuzzy Subgroups of Groups

Similar documents
Lower and Upper Approximation of Fuzzy Ideals in a Semiring

Some Properties of a Set-valued Homomorphism on Modules

Roughness in ordered Semigroups. Muhammad Shabir and Shumaila Irshad

FUZZY n-inner PRODUCT SPACE

Stability in Distribution for Backward Uncertain Differential Equation

FLAT CYCLOTOMIC POLYNOMIALS OF ORDER FOUR AND HIGHER

Randomized Perfect Bipartite Matching

NECESSARY AND SUFFICIENT CONDITIONS FOR LATENT SEPARABILITY

EECE 301 Signals & Systems Prof. Mark Fowler

Syntactic Complexity of Suffix-Free Languages. Marek Szykuła

A New Kind of Fuzzy Sublattice (Ideal, Filter) of A Lattice

FIXED POINTS AND STABILITY IN NEUTRAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS WITH VARIABLE DELAYS

1 Motivation and Basic Definitions

The multisubset sum problem for finite abelian groups

On the Exponential Operator Functions on Time Scales

Characterization of Gamma Hemirings by Generalized Fuzzy Gamma Ideals

FRACTIONAL HERMITE-HADAMARD INEQUALITIES FOR SOME CLASSES OF DIFFERENTIABLE PREINVEX FUNCTIONS

Problem Set If all directed edges in a network have distinct capacities, then there is a unique maximum flow.

Introduction to Congestion Games

Chapter 7: Inverse-Response Systems

Classification of 3-Dimensional Complex Diassociative Algebras

On fuzzy normed algebras

Fractional Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Bridge

On certain subclasses of close-to-convex and quasi-convex functions with respect to k-symmetric points

Intuitionistic Fuzzy 2-norm

THE GENERALIZED PASCAL MATRIX VIA THE GENERALIZED FIBONACCI MATRIX AND THE GENERALIZED PELL MATRIX

6.8 Laplace Transform: General Formulas

, the. L and the L. x x. max. i n. It is easy to show that these two norms satisfy the following relation: x x n x = (17.3) max

Network Flows: Introduction & Maximum Flow

Faα-Irresolute Mappings

arxiv: v1 [math.fa] 9 Dec 2018

Research Article An Upper Bound on the Critical Value β Involved in the Blasius Problem

EE Control Systems LECTURE 2

CHAPTER 7. Definition and Properties. of Laplace Transforms

Note on Matuzsewska-Orlich indices and Zygmund inequalities

To become more mathematically correct, Circuit equations are Algebraic Differential equations. from KVL, KCL from the constitutive relationship

Optimal State-Feedback Control Under Sparsity and Delay Constraints

Research Article On Double Summability of Double Conjugate Fourier Series

GCD AND LCM-LIKE IDENTITIES FOR IDEALS IN COMMUTATIVE RINGS

ESTIMATES FOR THE DERIVATIVE OF DIFFUSION SEMIGROUPS

Group C*-algebras A.K. Recall 1 that if G is a nonempty set, the linear space

Flow networks. Flow Networks. A flow on a network. Flow networks. The maximum-flow problem. Introduction to Algorithms, Lecture 22 December 5, 2001

Notes on cointegration of real interest rates and real exchange rates. ρ (2)

A NOTE ON PRE-J-GROUP RINGS

A finitely presented group with unbounded dead-end depth

A problem related to Bárány Grünbaum conjecture

A Guided Tour in the Topos of Graphs

FREE ODD PERIODIC ACTIONS ON THE SOLID KLEIN BOTTLE

Continuous Time Linear Time Invariant (LTI) Systems. Dr. Ali Hussein Muqaibel. Introduction

Average Case Lower Bounds for Monotone Switching Networks

A Logic of Orthogonality

Spider Diagrams: a diagrammatic reasoning system

Computers and Mathematics with Applications

2. VECTORS. R Vectors are denoted by bold-face characters such as R, V, etc. The magnitude of a vector, such as R, is denoted as R, R, V

11!Hí MATHEMATICS : ERDŐS AND ULAM PROC. N. A. S. of decomposiion, properly speaking) conradics he possibiliy of defining a counably addiive real-valu

Undetermined coefficients for local fractional differential equations

The Asymptotic Behavior of Nonoscillatory Solutions of Some Nonlinear Dynamic Equations on Time Scales

Rough Paths and its Applications in Machine Learning

Laplace Transform. Inverse Laplace Transform. e st f(t)dt. (2)

Essential Maps and Coincidence Principles for General Classes of Maps

u(t) Figure 1. Open loop control system

What is maximum Likelihood? History Features of ML method Tools used Advantages Disadvantages Evolutionary models

Random Walk with Anti-Correlated Steps

Improved Approximate Solutions for Nonlinear Evolutions Equations in Mathematical Physics Using the Reduced Differential Transform Method

International Journal of Mathematics Trends and Technology (IJMTT) Volume 37 Number 3 September 2016

A natural selection of a graphic contraction transformation in fuzzy metric spaces

Algorithmic Discrete Mathematics 6. Exercise Sheet

Sections 2.2 & 2.3 Limit of a Function and Limit Laws

Solution of Integro-Differential Equations by Using ELzaki Transform

Product of Fuzzy Metric Spaces and Fixed Point Theorems

Positive and negative solutions of a boundary value problem for a

BSDE's, Clark-Ocone formula, and Feynman-Kac formula for Lévy processes Nualart, D.; Schoutens, W.

A LOGIC OF ORTHOGONALITY

U T,0. t = X t t T X T. (1)

Spider Diagrams: a diagrammatic reasoning system

Admin MAX FLOW APPLICATIONS. Flow graph/networks. Flow constraints 4/30/13. CS lunch today Grading. in-flow = out-flow for every vertex (except s, t)

Chapter 2. First Order Scalar Equations

A NEW APPROACH FOR STUDYING FUZZY FUNCTIONAL EQUATIONS

On the probabilistic stability of the monomial functional equation

SELBERG S CENTRAL LIMIT THEOREM ON THE CRITICAL LINE AND THE LERCH ZETA-FUNCTION. II

On the stability of a Pexiderized functional equation in intuitionistic fuzzy Banach spaces

Stat13 Homework 7. Suggested Solutions

Main Reference: Sections in CLRS.

arxiv:math/ v2 [math.fa] 30 Jul 2006

An introduction to the theory of SDDP algorithm

Bilal Khan Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York, New York, NY 10019, USA.

Fractional Brownian Bridge Measures and Their Integration by Parts Formula

Application of a Stochastic-Fuzzy Approach to Modeling Optimal Discrete Time Dynamical Systems by Using Large Scale Data Processing

A NOTE ON THE STRUCTURE OF BILATTICES. A. Avron. School of Mathematical Sciences. Sackler Faculty of Exact Sciences. Tel Aviv University

Approximate Controllability of Fractional Stochastic Perturbed Control Systems Driven by Mixed Fractional Brownian Motion

Math-Net.Ru All Russian mathematical portal

Retrieval Models. Boolean and Vector Space Retrieval Models. Common Preprocessing Steps. Boolean Model. Boolean Retrieval Model

Matrix Versions of Some Refinements of the Arithmetic-Geometric Mean Inequality

Linear Algebra Primer

Notes on Kalman Filtering

INDEPENDENT SETS IN GRAPHS WITH GIVEN MINIMUM DEGREE

Cash Flow Valuation Mode Lin Discrete Time

Algorithms. Algorithms 6.4 MAXIMUM FLOW

Explicit form of global solution to stochastic logistic differential equation and related topics

Excerpt from the Proceedings of the COMSOL Conference 2010 Boston

Transcription:

Journal of mahemaic and compuer cience 12 (2014), 186-195 T-Rough Fuzzy Subgroup of Group Ehagh Hoeinpour Deparmen of Mahemaic, Sari Branch, Ilamic Azad Univeriy, Sari, Iran. hoienpor_a51@yahoo.com Aricle hiory: Received July 2014 Acceped Augu 2014 Available online Augu 2014 Abrac The rough e heory wa inroduced by Pawlak in 1982. I wa propoed for preenaion equivalence relaion. Bu he concep of fuzzy e wa inroduced by Zadeh in 1965. In hi paper,he concep of he rough e,t-rough e,t-rough fuzzy e, T-rough fuzzy ubgroup, T-rough fuzzy ideal, and e-valued homomorphim of group will be given. A neceery and ufficien condiion for a fuzzy ubgroup(ideal) and fuzzy prime ideal of a group under a e-valued homomorphim o be a T-rough fuzzy ubgroup(ideal) and T-rough fuzzy prime ideal i aed. The purpoe of hi paper i o inroduce and dicu he concep of T-rough fuzzy group of group ha hoe have been proved in everal paper. Alo, we proved ha inerecion wo fuzzy ubgroup(ideal) of a e under a e-valued homomorphim i a T-rough fuzzy ubgroup of oher e. Keyword: Approximaion pace, T-rough e, T-rough fuzzy e, Fuzzy ubgroup, Fuzzy ideal, e-valued homomorphim. 1. Inroducion The noion of rough e wa inroduced by Z.Pawlak in he year 1982 [24-25]. Rough e heory, a new mahemaical approach o deal wih inexac, uncerain or vague. Knowledge, ha recenly received wide aenion on he reearch area in boh of he real-life applicaion and he heory ielf. I ha found pracical applicaion in many area uch a knowledge dicovery,machine learning, daa analyi, approximae claificaion, conflic analyi, and o on [21-28]. Rough e heory i a mahemaical framework for dealing wih uncerainy and o ome exen overlapping fuzzy e heory. The rough e heory approach i baed on indicernibiliy relaion and approximaion. The heory of rough e i an exenion of e heory. The concep of a fuzzy e wa inroduced by Zadeh [32], and i i now a rigorou area of reearch wih manifold applicaion ranging from engineering and compuer cience o medical diagnoi and ocial behavior udie. In paricular, ome reearcher [12,15] applied he noion of fuzzy e o ideal of a ring. The algebraic approach of rough e wa udied by ome auhor, for example, Q.M.Xiao and Z.L.Zhang [30] udied rough prime ideal and rough fuzzy prime ideal in emigroup. Baed on he

E. Hoeinpour / J. Mah. Compuer Sci. 12 (2014), 186-195 conrucive mehod, exenive reearch ha alo been carried ou o compare he heory of rough e wih oher heorie of uncerainy uch a fuzzy e and condiional even. Since Roenfeld [29], applied he noion of fuzzy e o algebra and inroduced he noion of fuzzy ubgroup, ince hen many reearcher are engaged in exending he concep of abrac algebra o he broader framework of he fuzzy eing. In 1982, Liu [17] defined and udied fuzzy ubring and fuzzy ideal of a ring. Reader in [4,9,10,11,14], will ge ome definiion and baic reul abou fuzzy algebra ha heir properie were carefully udied o a cerain exen. Rough fuzzy e and fuzzy rough e are alo udied by Nakamura [19], Nanda [20], Biwa [2,3], and by Banerjee and Pal [1]. Several reearch direcion have been uggeed on fuzzy rough e and rough fuzzy e. In hi paper, we inroduce he concep of he rough e, T-rough e, T-rough fuzz e,trough fuzzy ubgroup(ideal), T-rough fuzzy prime ideal and e-valued homomorphim in a group and give ome properie of uch ideal and hen exended ome heorem in which have been proved in [12,14]. 2. Preliminarie The following definiion and preliminarie are required in he equel of our work and hence preened in brief. Some of hem were in [21]. Suppoe ha U i a non-empy e. A pariion or claificaion of U i a family of non-empy ube of U uch ha each elemen of U i conained in exacly one elemen of. Recall ha an equivalence relaion on a e U i a reflexive, ymmeric, and raniive binary relaion on U. Eech pariion induce an equivalence relaion on U by eing. x y x and y are in he ame cla of. Converely, each equivalence relaion on U induce a pariion of U whoe clae have he form x y U x y. Definiion 2.1.[25]. A pair U, where U and i an equivalence relaion on U i called an approximaion pace. Definiion 2.2.[25]. For an approximaion pace U, by a rough approximaion in U, we mean a mapping Apr : P( U ) P( U ) P( U ) defined by for every X P( U ), Apr ( X ) ( Apr ( X ), Apr ( X )), where Apr ( X ) i called a lower rough approximaion of X in, rough approximaion of X in U,. Definiion 2.3. Given an approximaion pace U, a pair (, ) rough e in U, if ( A, B ) ( Apr( X ), Apr( X )) for ome X P( U ) Definiion 2.4.[15]. Le, 0,1. If x U. We define a x a x Apr ( X ) x U x X, Apr ( X ) x U x X. U wherea Apr ( X ) i called a upper A B in P( U ) P( U ) i called a. U be an approximaion pace. A ube fuzzy i a mapping from U o Apr ( )( x ) ( a), Apr ( )( x ) ( a) 187

E. Hoeinpour / J. Mah. Compuer Sci. 12 (2014), 186-195 They are called, repecively, he lower and he upper approximaion of he fuzzy ube. Apr ( ) ( Apr( ), Apr( )) i called a rough fuzzy e repec o if Apr ( ) Apr ( ). Definiion 2.5.[15]. Le be a fuzzy ube of G, 0,1. Then he e xg ( x) ; xg ( x) are called, repecively, -levele and -rong levele of he fuzzy e. Definiion 2.6.[ 29 ]. A fuzzy ube of a group G i called a fuzzy ubgroup if, for all xy, in G, (1) ( xy) ( x) ( y ); 1 (2) ( x ) ( x ). Definiion 2.7.[29 ]. A fuzzy ube of a group G i called a fuzzy ideal if, for all xy, in G, ( xy) ( x) ( y ) Definiion 2.8.[15 ]. A fuzzy ube of a group G i called a fuzzy prime ideal if, for all xy, in G, ( xy) ( x) or ( xy) ( y ) Definiion 2.9.[ 15,18 ]. Le and be wo fuzzy ube of G, hen produc i defined by ( )( z ) ( ( ) ( )) zxy x y for ome x, y G. 3. Se-valued homomorphim which induced by group Definiion 3.1. [ 5 ]. Le X and Y be wo non-empy e and B Y. Le T : X P ( Y ) be a evalued mapping where P ( Y ) upper invere of B under T are defined by denoe he e of all non-empy ube of Y. The lower invere and 1 T ( B ) x X T ( x ) B ; T ( B ) x X T ( x ) B. Definiion 3.2. [ 1 ]. Le X and Y be wo non-empy e and B Y. Le T : X P ( Y ) be a evalued mapping where P ( Y ) denoe he e of all non-empy ube of Y. 1 ( T ( B ), T ( B )) called T-rough e of G. Example 3.3. Le U, be an approximaion pace and T : U P ( U ) be a e-valued mapping where T ( x ), hen for any B U, T ( B ) Apr ( B ) and x T 1 ( B ) Apr ( B ). Definiion 3.4. [ 29 ]. Le G and G be wo group and T : G P ( G) be a e-valued mapping. T i called a e-valued homomorphim if for all x, y G, (1) T( xy) T( x) T( y ); (2) T x -1 a -1 a T x T x -1 ( ( )) ( ). Remark 3.5. Example 3.3 i a e-valued homomorphim. So a group homomorphim i a pecial cae of x y xy for all a e-valued homomorphim. Le be a complee congruence relaion, i.e., x, y G. Define : ( ) T G P G by T ( x ) x Furher, by Example 3.3, he rough e are T-rough e. for all xg, hen T i a e-valued homomorphim. i 188

E. Hoeinpour / J. Mah. Compuer Sci. 12 (2014), 186-195 Definiion 3.6.[12,13]. Le G and G be wo group and T : G P ( G) be a e-valued homomorphim. Le be a fuzzy ube of G. For every xg, we define T ( ) and T T x a T x a at ( x ) at ( x ) 1 ( )( ) ( ) ; ( )( ) ( ). 1 ( ) are called, repecively, he T- rough lower and he T- rough upper fuzzy ube of G. If T ( ) and 1 1 T ( ) are fuzzy prime ideal, ( T ( ), T ( )) i aid o be T- rough fuzzy prime ideal of G. Propoiion 3.7. Le G and G be wo group and T : G P ( G) be a e-valued homomorphim. Le and be wo fuzzy ube of G, hen following hold: (1) -1-1 -1 T ( ) T ( ) T ( ); (2) T ( ) T ( ) T ( ); (3) implie T ( ) T ( ) and -1-1 -1 T ( ) T ( ) T ( ); -1-1 T ( ) T ( ); (4) (5) T ( ) T ( ) T ( ). Proof. The proof i wih uing of definiion. Theorem 3.8. Le G and G be wo group and T : G P ( G) be a e-valued homomorphim. If i a fuzzy ubgroup of G, hen T 1 ( ) i a fuzzy ubgroup of G. Proof. Le i a fuzzy ubgroup of G. Then we have for all x, y G, Hence 1 T ( )( xy) ( z) ( ab) z T ( xy) a T ( x), bt ( y) ( ( a) ( b)) a T ( x), b T ( y) T 1 ( )( xy) T 1 ( )( x) T 1 ( )( y ). And -1-1 -1 Therefore T x T x. ( ( a)) ( ( b)) a T ( x) b T ( y) 1 1 T ( )( x) T ( )( y). -1-1 -1 T x a a -1-1 a T x a T x T -1 x Theorem 3.9. Le G and G be wo group and T : G P ( G) be a e-valued homomorphim. If i a fuzzy ubgroup of G, hen T ( ) i a fuzzy ubgroup of G. Proof. Le i a fuzzy ubgroup of G. Then we have for all x, y G,. 189

E. Hoeinpour / J. Mah. Compuer Sci. 12 (2014), 186-195 T ( )( xy) ( z) ( ab) z T ( xy) a T ( x), b T ( y) Hence T ( )( xy) T ( )( x) T ( )( y ). And -1 + Therefore T x T x. Corollary 3.10. Le G and ( ( a) ( b)) a T ( x), b T ( y) ( ( a)) ( ( b)) a T ( x) b T ( y) T ( )( x) T ( )( y). + -1-1 T x a a -1-1 a T x a T x T x. G be wo group and T : G P ( G) be a e-valued homomorphim. If i a fuzzy ubgroup of G, hen 1 ( T ( ), T ( )) i a T- rough fuzzy ubgroup of G. Theorem 3.11. Le G and G be wo group and T : G P ( G) be a e-valued homomorphim. If i a fuzzy ideal of G, hen 1 ( T ( ), T ( )) i a T- rough fuzzy ideal of G. Proof. Le i a fuzzy ideal of G. Then we have for all x, y G, 1 1 1 Hence T ( )( xy ) T ( )( x ) T ( )( y ). Alo 1 T ( )( xy ) ( z ) ( ab ) z T ( xy ) at ( x ), bt ( y ) ( ( a) ( b)) at ( x ), bt ( y ) ( ( a)) ( ( b)) at ( x ) bt ( y ) T 1 ( )( x ) T 1 ( )( y ). T ( )( xy ) ( z ) ( ab ) z T ( xy ) at ( x ), bt ( y ) ( ( a) ( b)) at ( x ), bt ( y ) ( ( a)) ( ( b)) at ( x ) bt ( y ) T ( )( x ) T ( )( y ). Therefore T ( )( xy ) T ( )( x ) T ( )( y ) Propoiion 3.12. Le G and G be wo group and T : G P ( G) be a e-valued homomorphim. Le and be wo fuzzy ube of G, hen following hold: 190

E. Hoeinpour / J. Mah. Compuer Sci. 12 (2014), 186-195 1 1 1 T ( ) T ( ) T ( ); (1) (2) T ( ) T ( ) T ( ). Proof.(1) For any x, y, z G, we have Therefore T 1 ( )( x ) ( )( a ) ( min( ( y ), ( z )) ) a T ( x) a T ( x) a yz ( min( ( a), ( a)) ) a T ( x) a yz (min ( a), ( a) ) ( )( a) a T ( x) a T ( x) T1 ( )( x ). 1 1 1 1 T ( ) T ( ) T ( ) T ( ). (2). The proof i imilar o he proof (1). Lemma 3.13. Le be a fuzzy ube of a group G. Then i a fuzzy ubgroup of G if and only if for all 0,1, if,, hen and are fuzzy ubgroup of G. 1 Proof. Aume i a fuzzy ubgroup of G. We how ha xy, x for all, xy. Since 1 i a fuzzy ubgroup of G, we have ( xy) ( x) ( y), ( x ) ( x). Since x, y, 1 hen ( x ), ( y ). I implie ha xy, x. Hence i a fuzzy ubgroup of G. Similarly, we can how i a fuzzy ubgroup of G, oo. Converely, le i a fuzzy ubgroup of G for all 0,1, and. Aume x y, x for all x, y G. I implie xy,. Since i a fuzzy ubgroup of G, hen 1 1 xy, x. Therefore ( xy) ( x) ( y), x ( x ). Hence i a fuzzy ubgroup of G. Lemma 3.14. Le be a fuzzy ube of a group G. Then i a fuzzy ideal of G if and only if for all 0,1, if,, hen and are fuzzy ideal of G. Proof. The proof i imilar o he proof lemma 3.13. Lemma 3.15. Le be a fuzzy ube of a group G. Then i a fuzzy prime ideal of G if and only if for all 0,1, if,, hen and are fuzzy prime ideal of G. Proof. Aume i a fuzzy prime ideal of G. Aume. By lemma 3.14, i an ideal of G. Le x, y G, uch ha xy. Since i a fuzzy prime ideal of G, hen ( xy) ( x ) or 191

E. Hoeinpour / J. Mah. Compuer Sci. 12 (2014), 186-195 ( xy) ( y ). I implie x or y. Therefore i a prime ideal of G. Similarly, we can how i a prime ideal of G,oo. Converely, aume for all 0,1, if, hen i a prime ideal of L. Le x, y L, By lemma 3.14, i a fuzzy ideal of G. I implie ( xy) ( x ) and ( xy) ( y ). Le ( xy ). Thu xy. Since i a prime ideal of G, x or y. I mean ha ( x) ( xy ) or ( y) ( xy ). Hence ( xy) ( x ) or ( xy) ( y ). Therefore i a fuzzy prime ideal of G. Lemma3.16. Le G and G be wo group and T : G P ( G) be a e-valued homomorphim. If i a fuzzy ideal of G, hen for any 0,1, (1) ( T ( )) T ( ); (2) 1 1 ( T ( )) T ( ); (3) ( T ( )) T ( ); 1 1 ( 4) ( T ( )) T ( ). Proof. (1). x ( T ( )) T ( )( x ) ( a) a T ( x ) (2). a T ( x ), ( a) T ( x ) x T ( ). 1 1 x ( T ( )) T ( )( x) ( a) a T ( x) a T ( x), ( a) 1 T ( x) x T ( ). (3) and (4) are imilar o (1) and (2). Theorem 3.17. Le G and G be wo group and T : G P ( G) be a e-valued homomorphim. If i a fuzzy prime ideal of G, hen T ( ) and T 1 ( ) are fuzzy prime ideal of G. Proof. Le be a fuzzy prime ideal of G. By lemma 3.15, for all 0,1, if, hen i a prime ideal of G. By lemma 3.16 and 3.15, for all 0,1, if ( T ( )),( T ( )) i a prime ideal of G. By lemma 3.15, T ( ) i a fuzzy prime ideal of G. Hence i a lower T-rough fuzzy prime ideal of G. Similarly, i a upper T-rough fuzzy prime ideal of G. Therefore T ( ) are fuzzy prime ideal of G. and T 1 ( ) 192

E. Hoeinpour / J. Mah. Compuer Sci. 12 (2014), 186-195 Propoiion 3.18. LeG and G be wo group and T : G P ( G) be a e-valued homomorphim. Le and be wo fuzzy ubgroup( ideal) of G, hen i a upper T- rough fuzzy ubgroup(ideal) of G. Proof. Le x, y G, hen 1 T ( )( xy ) )( z ) ( )( ab ) z T ( xy) a T ( x), b T ( y) (min ( ab), ( ab) ) a T ( x), b T ( y) a b a b (min min ( ), ( ),min ( ), ( ) ) a T ( x), b T ( y) a a b b (min min ( ), ( ),min ( ), ( ) ) a T ( x), b T ( y) (min ( )( a),( )( b) ) a T ( x), b T ( y) ( ( )( a)) ( ( )( b)) a T ( x) b T ( y) 1 1 T ( )( x) T ( )( y). 1 1 1 Therefore T ( )( xy) T ( )( x) T ( )( y ). Alo 1 1 1 1 1 T x a a T x 1 a T x. at x Hence i a upper T- rough fuzzy ubgroup of G. Propoiion 3.19. Le G and G be wo group and T : G P ( G) be a e-valued homomorphim. Le an be wo fuzzy ubgroup( ideal) of G, hen i a lower T- rough fuzzy ubgroup ( ideal) of G. Proof. The proof i imilar o he proof propoiion 3.18. 4. Concluion Fuzzy e heory and rough e heory ake ino accoun wo differen apec of uncerainy ha can be encounered in real-world problem in many field. Fuzzy e deal wih poibiliie uncerainy, conneced from ambiguiy of informaion. The combinaion of fuzzy e and rough e lead o variou model. Thi paper i inended o buil up a connecion beween rough e, fuzzy e and group heory. The noion of T- rough fuzzy ubgroup in a group i a generalizaion of he noion of fuzzy ubgroup in a group. Alo, uing he concep of relaion beween rough fuzzy ubgroup and level rough e. In hi paper, we ubiued a univere e by a group, and inroduced he e-valued homomorphim and T- rough fuzzy ubgroup, and T-rough fuzzy ideal and T-rough fuzzy prime ideal in a group baed on 193

E. Hoeinpour / J. Mah. Compuer Sci. 12 (2014), 186-195 definiion in [12,13,16,30,31]. We generalized ome idea preened by Davvaz [5,6]. Furher, we udied and inveigaed ome heir inereing properie of a e-valued homomorphim induced by a group homomorphim.we hope ha hi exended reearch many provide a powerful ool in approximae reaoning. Alo, we believe, hi paper offered here will urn ou o be more ueful in he heory and applicaion of rough e and fuzzy e. Acknowledgmen The auhor i highly graeful o referee for heir valuable commen and uggeion for improving he paper. Reference [1] M.Banerjee, and S.K. Pal, Roughne of a fuzzy e, Inform. Sci.93, (1996),235-246. [2] R.Biwa, On rough e and fuzzy rough e, Bull. Pol.Acad. Sci. Mah.42, (1994), 345-349. [3] R. Biwa, On rough fuzzy e, Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Mah.42,(1994), 352-355. [4] Z. Bonikowaki, Algebraic rucure of rough e, in: W.P. Ziarko (Ed.),Rough Se, Fuzzy Se and Knowledge Dicovery, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, (1995), 242-247. [5] B. Davvaz, A hor noe on algebraic T-rough e,informaion Science, Vol.17, (2008),3247-3252. [6] B. Davvaz, Roughne in ring, Inform. Sci. 164,(2004), 147-163. [7] D.Duboi, H. Prade, Rough fuzzy e and fuzzy rough e, In. J. General Sy. 17 (2-3),(1990), 191-209. [8] D. Duboi, H. Prade, Two fold fuzzy e and rough e-ome iue in knowledge repreenaion, Fuzzy Se Sy. 23, (1987), 3-18. [9] E.Ranjbar-Yanehari, M.Aghari-Larimi, union and inerecion fuzzy ubhypergroup, JMCS, Vol.5, No.2, (2012)82-90. [10] E. Hendukolaie, On fuzzy homomorphim beween hypernear-ring, JMCS, Vol.2, No.4, (2011)702-716. [11] E. Hendukolaie, M.Aliakbarnia.omran, Y.Naabi, On fuzzy iomorphim heorem of - hypernear-ring, JMCS, Vol.7, (2013)80-88. [12] S.B. Hoeini, N. Jafarzadeh, A. Gholami, T-rough Ideal and T-rough Fuzzy Ideal in a Semigrou, Advanced Maerial Reearch, Vol.433-440,(2012), 4915-4919. [13] S.B.Hoeini, N. Jafarzadeh, A. Gholami, Some Reul on T-rough (prime, primary) Ideal and T-rough Fuzzy (prime, primary) Ideal on Commuaive Ring,In.J.Conemp. Mah Scince, Vol.7,( (2012), 337-350. [14] T.Iwinki, Algebraic approach o rough e, Bull. PolihAcad. Sci. Mah.35, (1987), 673-683. [15] O. Kazanci, B. Davvaz, On he rucure of rough prime (primary) ideal and rough fuzzy prime (primary) ideal in commuaive ring, Informaion Science, 178, (2008), 1343-1354. [16] N.Kuroki, Rough ideal in emigroup, Inform. Sci. 100, (1997), 139-163. [17] W.J. Liu, Fuzzy invarian ubgroup and fuzzy ideal, Fuzzy Se Sy. 8,(1982) 133 139. [18] J.N. Mordeon, M.S. Malik, Fuzzy Commuaive Algebra, World Publihing, Singapore,1998. [19] A.Nakamura, Fuzzy rough e, Noe on Muliple-valued Logic in Japan,9 (8),(1988), 1-8. [20] S. Nanda, Fuzzy rough e, Fuzzy Se and Syem, 45,(1992), 157-160. [21] Z. Pawlak, Rough e, In. J. Inform. Compu. Sci. 11, (1982),341-356. [22] Z. Pawlak, Rough e- Theoreical Apec of Reaoning abou Daa, Kluwer Academic Publihing, Dordrech,1991 [23] Z. Pawlak, Rough e power e hierarchy, ICS PAS Rep.470, (1982). [24] Z. Pawlak, Rough e algebraic and opological approach, ICS PAS Rep. 482, (1982). [25] Z. Pawlak, Rough e and fuzzy e, Fuzzy Se and Syem.17, (1985), 99-102. [26] Z. Pawlak, Some remark on rough e, Bull. Pol. Acad.Tech. 33, (1985). [27] Z. Pawlak, A. Skowron, Rough e and Boolean reaoning, Informaion Science, 177, (2007), 41-73. 194

E. Hoeinpour / J. Mah. Compuer Sci. 12 (2014), 186-195 [28] Z. Pawlak, A. Skowron, Rough e: ome exenion, Informaion Science, 177, (2007), 28-40. [29] A. Roenfeild, Fuzzy Group, Journal of Mahemaical Analyi and Applicaion, 35, (1971) 512-517. [30] Q.M. Xiao, Z.L. Zhang, Rough prime ideal and rough fuzzy prime ideal in emigroup, Informaion Science, 176, (2006), 725-733. [31] S. Yamak, O. Kazanci, B. Davvaz, Generalized lower and upper approximaion in a ring,informaion Science 180, (2010) 1759-1768. [32] L.A. Zadeh, Fuzzy e, Inform. Conrol 8, (1965) 338-353. 195