Heisenberg Model and Rigged Configurations Pulak Ranjan Giri and Tetsuo Deguchi Department of Physics, Graduate School of Humanities and Sciences, Ochanomizu University, Ohtsuka --, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, -86, Japan (Dated: February, 5) We show a correspondence of all the solutions of the spin-/ isotropic Heisenberg model for N = to the rigged configurations based on the comparison of the set of Takahashi quantum numbers in lexicographical order with the set of riggings of the rigged configurations in co-lexicographical order. PACS numbers: 7..Jm,.3Ik, 3.65Fd arxiv:5.78v [hep-th] 3 Jan 5 I. INTRODUCTION The study of the isotropic spin-/ Heisenberg model still remains to be very much important in the research field of the integrable models due to its complex structure of solutions, which have not been completely understood till to date. Although the eigenvalue equation was solved several decades ago [], the completeness issue of the spectrum still remains an open problem. For a deeper understanding of the isotropic spin-/ Heisenberg model, its variants and for various approaches to solve these models see refs. [ 6]. Getting the solutions to the Bethe ansatz equations, which produce eigenvalues and their corresponding Bethe eigenstates, are difficult because of their high degree of nonlinearity and multi-variate nature. Numerical method is the only way, where several attempts have been made to obtain the solutions to the Bethe ansatz equations. First complete solutions for N = 8, spin-/ XXX chains were obtained in ref. [7], where the Bethe ansatz equations are solved by an iteration method. On the other hand in ref. [8] (see supplemental material) solutions up to N = 4 are obtained by making use of the homotopy continuation method. The solutions to the Bethe ansatz equations have a rich and diverse structure. As known to Bethe himself, the complex solutions come in complex conjugate pairs and typically arrange themselves in a set of string like structures. This apparent distribution of the rapidities in the form of strings leads to the string hypothesis [9]. The strings together with their deformations are very much useful for the study of the finite length spin chains. Although it is known that the string hypothesis does not work for some solutions of relatively large yet finite spin chains due to the collapse of certain numbers to string solutions, it still works well in practical purpose for most of the solutions of the finite length chains. The complex solutions, which are responsible for the formation of bound states, present more challenges in the numerical methods compared to the real solutions. Nonetheless the knowledge of the complex solutions are essential for the understanding of the dynamics of the model and for the evaluations of the correlation functions [, ] and other physical quantities. Recently it has been shown [] that some of the solutions of N =, which have some odd-length strings with complex centers, do not fit into the standard form of the string solutions. The existence of the complex centered odd-length strings make those strings non-self-conjugate individually, although the solutions as a whole remain self-conjugate. Another interesting solutions are the singular solutions, which, because of their two constituent rapidities of the form ± i, make the eigenvalues and their corresponding Bethe eigenstates ill-defined. A suitable regularization scheme [8, 3 5] is necessary to obtain well-defined eigenvalues and their corresponding Bethe eigenstates for these type of solutions. The different classes of solutions make the counting process, known as the completeness of the spectrum, very difficult. Although string hypothesis provides a proof for the completeness, its certain assumptions are not legitimate [6 3] for the finite length chains. One way out is to check the completeness by obtaining all the solutions of the Bethe ansatz equations. On the other hand, there is a nice one-to-one and onto mapping between the solutions of the Bethe ansatz equations and a combinatorial object known as the rigged configuration [3 34], which is helpful to understand the completeness problem. However, there are certain solutions for the large length chains, such as the solutions corresponding to the collapse of the -strings, which do not have straight forward mapping to the rigged configurations. Recent conjecture [35] on the rigged configurations has predicted the numbers of singular solutions present in a spin chain. Although, the correspondence between a few solutions of the Bethe ansatz equations for some Electronic address: pulakgiri@gmail.com Electronic address: deguchi@phys.ocha.ac.jp
lengths of the spin chain to the rigged configurations are known, the complete correspondences of all the solutions of a spin chain has never been shown. The purpose of this present paper is to provide a complete correspondence between all the solutions of the Bethe ansatz equations of an isotropic spin-/ Heisenberg chain for N = and the rigged configurations. The reason for choosing N = case is the following: For an even-length spin chain, N = is the lowest length which has some intriguing features in the solutions of the Bethe ansatz equations. One is, as mentioned above, there are some roots, called non-self-conjugate string solutions, which do not fit in the standard framework of the string hypothesis. The other being, which we will show in this paper, there are some solutions which seem to be of the form λ±.5i. However, numerical evaluations with higher working precision show that there are small imaginary deviation ǫ N i to these solutions, which are usually overlooked in the numerical methods. Note that N = can be directly diagonalized to obtain the eigenvalues. Recently it has been completely solved by homotopy continuation method [8], where the above mentioned two types of solutions have not be given proper attention. We alternatively study the N = spin chain by an iteration method making use of the deformed strings structures of the solutions and obtain a correspondence among the solutions to the Bethe quantum numbers, Takahashi quantum numbers and the rigged configurations. One advantage of this method is that it enables us to obtain the Bethe quantum numbers and also the Takahashi quantum numbers, which are compared to the riggings of a rigged configuration to obtain the mapping. We organize this paper in the following fashion: In section II, we review the the algebraic Bethe ansatz method for the spin-/ isotropic Heisenberg model. In section III we discuss the string solutions which include non selfconjugate string solutions, almost singular string solutions and singular string solutions. In section IV we study the correspondence of the rigged configurations to the N = spin-/ isotropic Heisenberg model based on a comparison of the Takahashi quantum numbers with the riggings and finally we conclude. II. ALGEBRAIC BETHE ANSATZ METHOD In the algebraic Bethe ansatz method the Lax operator for the spin-/ isotropic Heisenberg model is given by ( ) λ is z L γ (λ) = γ isγ is γ + λ+isγ z, () where S γ ± = Sx γ ±isy γ, Sj i (j = x,y,z) is the spin-/ operator at the i-th lattice site and in j-direction. Each element of L γ (λ) is a matrix of dimension N N, which acts nontrivially on the γ-th lattice site. The monodromy matrix, T(λ), is then given by the direct product of the Lax matrices at each site ( ) A(λ) B(λ) T(λ) = L N (λ)l N (λ) L (λ) =. () C(λ) D(λ) The transfer matrix is obtained from the monodromy matrix () as t(λ) = A(λ)+D(λ). (3) The Hamiltonian of the spin-/ isotropic Heisenberg model on a one-dimensional periodic lattice of length N is then obtained by taking the logarithm of t(λ) at λ = i as ( H = J [ ] ) d N ( i dλ logt(λ) N = J Si x Sx i+ +Sy i Sy i+ +Sz i Sz i+ ). (4) λ= 4 i i= The Bethe states for M down-spins are given by λ,λ,,λ M = M B(λ α ) Ω, (5) where Ω is the reference eigenstate with all up-spins, B(λ α ) is an element of the monodromy matrix T(λ α ) obtained from eq. () and λ α are the rapidities. More explicitly the Bethe state (5) can be expressed as [36] M M B(λ α ) Ω = ( i) M α= j<k N λ j λ k +i λ j λ k M! x <x <x M N P S M Pj<Pk α= M (λ j i )N λ j= j + i M ( ) H(j k) M ( ) λpj λ Pk i λpj + i xj M λ Pj λ Pk +i λ Pj i Sx j Ω, (6) j= j=
where S M is the permutation group of M numbers with elements P and the Heaviside step function is defined as H(x) = for x > and H(x) = for x. Acting the transfer matrix t(λ) from the left on the Bethe state (5) we obtain M M M M t(λ) B(λ α ) Ω = Λ(λ,{λ α }) B(λ α ) Ω + Λ k (λ,{λ α })B(λ) B(λ α ) Ω, (7) α= α= where eigenvalue of the transfer matrix is given by ( Λ(λ,{λ α }) = λ+ i ) N M and the unwanted terms are given by ( i Λ k (λ,{λ α }) = λ k + i ) N M λ λ k λ α + i α= α k α= k= α k ( λ λ α i + λ i ) N M λ λ α +i, (8) λ λ α λ λ α= α ( λ k λ α i + λ k i ) N M λ k λ α α= α k β= β α λ k λ α +i λ k λ α 3, k =,,,M. (9) Eq. (7) reduces to the eigenvalue equation, if the unwanted terms (9) vanish, which enables us to obtain the Bethe ansatz equations ( ) N λα i M λ α λ β i =, α =,,,M. () λ α λ β +i Once the solutions λ α of the Bethe ansatz equations (), known as the Bethe roots, are obtained, the eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian H for the M down-spin sector are expressed as ( E = J [ ] ) d i dλ logλ(λ,{λ α}) N = J M ( λ α + 4). () The logarithmic form of eq. () is expressed as arctan(λ α ) = J α π N + N λ= i α= M arctan(λ α λ β ), α =,,,M, mod π, () β= β α where {J α,α =,,,M} are the Bethe quantum numbers, which take integral (half integral) values if N M is odd (even) respectively. Since the Bethe quantum numbers are repetitive, they are not useful for the process of counting the total number of states. Therefore a strictly non-repetitive quantum numbers are necessary, which are obtained as follows. In string hypothesis, the rapidities of a solution to the Bethe ansatz equations are arranged in form of strings of different lengths as λ j αa = λj α + i (j + a)+ j αa, a =,,,j, α =,,..,M j, (3) where the j-string of length j has the real center λ j α with α being the index to distinguish all the M j strings of same length and j αa are the string deviations. In the limit that these deviations vanish, j αa, equations () reduce to the convenient form arctan λj α j = π Ij α N + N N s M k k= Θ jk (λ) = ( δ jk )arctan ( Θ jk λ j α λ k β), mod π, β λ j k +arctan λ j k + + +arctan λ λ +arctan j +k j +k, (4) where M down-spins are partitioned into M k k-stings with the length of the largest string being N s such that Ns k km k = M. We now obtain the strictly non-repetitive quantum numbers Iα, j known as the Takahashi quantum numbers, from eq. (4), which have the following bounds ( Iα j N ) [min(j,k) δ j,k ]M k. (5) k=
4 III. STRING SOLUTIONS The solutions of the Bethe ansatz equations are usually arranged in a set of strings. In string hypothesis language the real solutions are -string solutions. Other solutions are composed of strings of different lengths as given in eq. (3). In the numerical iteration method first the centers of the strings λ j α are evaluated, which are used as the initial input for the next iteration method to calculate the deviations j αa and the centers. For finite but not so large spin chains, the deviations of the strings are of the form j αa = ǫj αa +iδj αa, (6) where the real ǫ j αa and δ j αa decreases exponentially with respect the length N of the spin chain. While implementing the iteration scheme, the complex conjugacy condition of the solutions are exploited to simplify the forms of these deviations. One useful way to implement it is to consider the strings to be individually self-conjugate, which implies [7] j αa = ( j αj+ a ). (7) The centre for the odd-length strings with these conditions are inevitably real. Since each of the stings in a given solution is self-conjugate, they are not related to each other. For the even-length spin chains up to N = all the solutions obey the conditions (7). Even most of the solutions for N = given in Tables 6 also obey these conditions. However a small number of solutions for N = do not obey the self-conjugacy conditions (7), which we discuss in the next subsection. A. Non Self-conjugate String solutions There are a few number of solutions for N = spin-/ chain, which do not fall in the standard form of the sting solutions discussed above. Note that in a scheme of small deviations, the self-conjugacy conditions (7) are too restrictive to be valid for all solutions. It is therefor necessary to impose the self conjugacy condition on whole set of the rapidities in a solution {λ j αa} = {(λ j αa) }. (8) Note that (8) implies (7), however the reverse is not true always. Relaxing the self-conjugacy condition as (8) allows the centre of the odd-length strings to be complex with small imaginary part in such a way that the solutions remain self-conjugate. These type of complex centered odd-string solutions, we call non self-conjugate string solutions, have been observed to appear for even-length spin chains for N. Here we remark that it is essential to keep the deviations small, so that the j αa limit lead to the Takahashi equations (4) and the Takahashi quantum numbers (5) can be obtained. The first two examples of such non self-conjugate string solutions appear in a set of solutions with two -strings and one 3-string in M = 5 down-spins sector of the N = spin chain. The self-conjugacy conditions (7) allow us to write the rapidities of the solutions in a simple form as {λ },{λ },{λ+ǫ+(+δ)i,λ,λ+ǫ (+δ)i}, (9) where the real parameters λ,λ,λ are the centers and ǫ,δ are small deviations. The curly brackets in the above expressions mean a set of rapidities of a given sting. In Table 5.3 all solutions expect two are obtained making use of (9) in the iteration process. For the two non self-conjugate string solutions we make use of the relaxed self-conjugacy condition (8), which allows us to write the rapidities as {λ },{λ+iδ },{λ+ǫ+(+δ )i,λ iδ,λ+ǫ (+δ )i}, () where the real parameters λ,λ are the centers and ǫ,δ,δ are the deviations. The solutions 7 and 7 in Table 5.3 are obtained by making use of () in the iteration process. Notice that because of the imaginary term iδ the -string {λ+iδ } and the 3-string {λ+ǫ+( + δ )i,λ iδ,λ + ǫ ( +δ )i} are individually non self-conjugate although together remain self-conjugate. The next three examples of such non self-conjugate string solutions appear in a set of solutions with one -string, one -string and one 3-string in M = 6 down-spins sector of the N = spin chain. The self-conjugacy conditions (7) allow us to write the rapidities of the solutions in a simple form as {λ },{λ + i (+δ),λ i (+δ)},{λ+ǫ+(+δ )i,λ,λ+ǫ (+δ )i}, ()
where the real parameters λ,λ,λ are the centers and the real parameters δ,δ,ǫ are small deviations. In Table 6.8 all solutions expect three are obtained making use of () in the iteration process. For the three non self-conjugate string solutions we make use of the relaxed self-conjugacy condition (8), which allows us to write the rapidities as {λ+iδ },{λ + i (+δ),λ i (+δ)},{λ+ǫ+(+δ )i,λ iδ,λ+ǫ (+δ )i}, () where the real parameters λ,λ,δ are the centers and the real parameters δ,δ,ǫ are small deviations. The solutions 5,8 and 9 in Table 6.8 are obtained by making use of () in the iteration process. The presence of the imaginary term iδ makes the -string {λ+iδ } and the 3-string {λ+ǫ+(+δ )i,λ iδ,λ+ǫ ( +δ )i} non self-conjugate individually although together they remain self-conjugate. 5 B. Almost singular string solutions There are some solutions {λ,λ,λ 3, λ M } for N = spin-/ chain, in which a pair of rapidities are of the form λ = aǫ+ i ( +ǫ N ), λ = aǫ i ( +ǫ N ), (3) where a and ǫ are small numbers such that aǫ is real in the case of N =. ǫ N is so small that in numerical calculation the contribution of ǫ N i does not usually appear unless the working precision is increased significantly. Most calculations wrongly produce solutions, in which the above pair takes the form λ = aǫ+ i, λ = aǫ i, (4) as obtained in the supplements of ref. [8]. However, analytically also it can be argued that there does not exist any solution containing a pair of rapidities of the form (4). Because of the similarity with the two regularized rapidities of the singular solutions with (3), we call such solutions almost singular. For M = 4 down-spins sector there are two such solutions 57,58 with two -strings shown in Table 4.4. For M = 5 down-spins sector there are six such solutions, two solutions 48, 49 with three -strings and one -string, which are shown in Table 5., two solutions,3 with one -string and one 4-string shown in Table 5.4 and the last two solutions 4,43 with one -string and two -strings shown in Table 5.6. For M = 6 there are two such solutions 55,56 with two -strings and one 4-string shown in Table 6.4. Note that almost singular solutions obtained for N = are all self-conjugate string solutions. C. Singular string solutions There are some solutions, known as the singular string solutions, of the form {λ = i,λ = i,λ 3,λ 4,,λ M }, (5) which produce ill-defined eigenvalues and the Bethe eigenstates due to the presence of the two rapidities of the form λ = i,λ = i. To obtain finite and well-defined eigenvalues and the Bethe eigenstates for these solutions it is imperative to exploit a suitable regularization scheme [, 3 5, 37, 38]. For the even length spin chains it has been observed that the rapidities and the corresponding Takahashi quantum numbers are distributed symmetrically making the sum of the rapidities to vanish M λ α =. (6) α= Note that the condition (6) is not only satisfied by singular string solutions, but also by other solutions, which also are invariant under the negation of their rapidities. The condition (6), noted in [7], forms a part of a conjecture in ref. [35]. The simplest singular string solution, found in M = down-spins sector, is of the form { i, i }. (7)
From condition (6) it clear that there is one singular solution in this sector, which is given as solution 46 with one -string in Table.. In M = 3 down-spins sector also condition (6) gives one solution of the form { i, i, }. (8) In Table 3. such solution is given in 85 with one -string and one -string. In M = 4 down-spins sector two class of solutions, compatible with the condition (6), are given by { i, i,a, a } { i, i,ia, ia } for a R, (9) for a R. (3) The solutions 7,76,9,98 in Table 4. with two -strings and one -string are of the form (9) and the solution 7 in Table 4.5 with one 4-string is of the form (3). In M = 5 down-spins sector there are two classes of singular sting solutions of the form { i }, i,,a, a for a R, (3) { i }, i,,ia, ia for a R. (3) The solutions,9,5 in Table 5. with three -strings and one -string are of the form of (3). Whereas the solution in Table 5.4 with one -string and one 4-string and the solution 83 in Table 5.7 with one -string and one 3-string are of the form of (3). In M = 6 down-spins sector there are four classes of solutions of the form { i, i,a, a,a, a } { i, i,a, a,ia, ia } { i, i,ia, ia,ia, ia } { i, i,a ±ia, a ±ia } for a,a R, (33) for a,a R, (34) for a,a R, (35) for a,a R. (36) Thesolutions,,6in Table 6.withfour-stringsandone-stringareofthe form(33). Thesolutions5,57,7,79 in Table 6.4 with two -strings and one 4-string are of the form (34). The solution 89 in Table 6.6 with one 6-string and the solution 5 in Table 6.8 with one -string, one -string and one 3-string are of the form (35). And finally the solution 6 in Table 6.9 with three -strings are of the form (36). 6 IV. RIGGED CONFIGURATIONS For finite length spin chains with no collapsing strings there is a correspondence between the solutions of the Bethe ansatz equations and a combinatorial object, known as the rigged configurations [35, 37]. Although, this correspondence has been shown for a few solutions of some given length spin-/ chains, the complete bijection of all the solutions of the Bethe ansatz equations to the rigged configurations have never been shown. Since this knowledge of correspondence is very much important in the completeness of the solutions, we in this section discuss the the bijection based on the comparison of the Takahashi quantum numbers with the riggings of the rigged configurations. Before we study a correspondence between the solutions of the Bethe ansatz equations to the rigged configurations let us briefly formulate the rigged configurations first. These are the Young Tableau like objects, which have two sets of integers to label them. The numbers on the left hand sides of the boxes are known as the vacancy numbers P k (ν) and the numbers on the right hand sides of the boxes are known as the riggings J k,α. In order to have these numbers, first the total numbers of down-spins M in a given solution is divided into s parts as ν = {ν,ν,,ν s }, such that the parts ν i s are positive and satisfy s i= ν i = M. For a spin-/ chain the vacancy number P k (ν) for a string of length k in a specific partition ν is given by P k (ν) = N s min(k,ν i ), (37) i=
where all the vacancy numbers are non-negative. Given a vacancy number the corresponding riggings J k,α are defined as The flip map κ among the riggings in a rigged configuration is defined as J k, J k, J k,mk P k (ν), (38) κ(j k,α ) = P k (ν) J k,mk α+, (39) which plays the same role as the transformation of all the rapidities in a solution under negation. For a correspondence between the solutions of the Bethe ansaz equations and the rigged configurations we need a rule such that a rigged configuration can be assigned to a particular solution. Such assignment can be done by comparing the riggings J with the real parts of the rapidities of the solutions of the Bethe ansatz equations. The higher value of the real part of the solutions to the Bethe equations is assigned to the higher value of the riggings [35]. For such a scheme to work one needs to actually solve the Bethe ansatz equations to obtain the rapidities. Moreover sometimes the rapidities of the solutions of the Bethe ansatz equations are very close to each other, which can make the scheme ineffective. We therefore consider another approach in which the comparison between the riggings with the Takahashi quantum numbers are done. 7 A. Rigged configurations and Bethe roots correspondence The mapping f starts from the largest strings to the lowest strings in decreasing order. For example, for M = 6 down-spin sectors with one 3-string, one -string and one -string, ν = {3,,}, first the rigging {J 3, } of 3-string is compared with the Takahashi quantum number {I 3 }, then the rigging {J,} of -string is compared with the Takahashi quantum number {I } and finally the rigging {J,} of -string is compared with the Takahashi quantum number {I }. In this example a specific length of string appear once. There are solutions where a specific length of string may appear more than once. Let us consider such an example in M = 6 down-spin sector with one 3-string and three -strings, ν = {3,,,}. In this case first the rigging {J 3, } of 3-string is compared with the Takahashi quantum number {I 3 }, then the the riggings {J,,J,,J,3 } of the three -strings are compared with the Takahashi quantum numbers {I,I,I 3 }. In a general perspective we have the following map f : {J k,,j k,,,j k,mk } {I k,i k,,im k k }. (4) When there is one string of a particular length in a partition, the set of rigging {J k, } is arranged in increasing order {J k, } = {J k,,j k,,,j I k + k, }, (4) where Jk, i < Ji+ k,. Similarly the set of Takahashi quantum numbers {I k } is also arranged in increasing order where I,i k < I,i+ k. We then easily obtain a mapping from {J k, } to {Ik } as {I k } = {I, k,i, k,,i, I k + k }, (4) f : J i k, I,i k i =,,, I k +. (43) When there are more than one k-strings in a partition, M k, then arrange the set of riggings in co-lexicographical order [39] as { ( ) (J k,,jk,, (,J k,mk), J k,,jk,, ),J k,mk,, J I k + C Mk k,,j Ik + C Mk k,,,j Ik + C } Mk k,m k. (44) where any element (J i k,,ji k,,,ji k,mk ),i =,,, I k + C Mk of the set (44) is arranged in weakly increasing order defined in (38). In co-lexicographical order the elements i, j(i < j) of (44) satisfy the following relation ( J i k,,j i k,,,j i k,m k ) < (J j k,,jj k,,,jj k,m k ), (45)
if and only if the m elements from the right satisfy J i k,l = Jj k,l, l = M k,m k,,m k m + and J i k,m k m < J j k,m k m. The set of Takahashi quantum numbers are arranged in lexicographical order [39] {( ) ( ) ( I, k,i, k,,im k, k, I, k,i, k,,im k, k,, I, I k + C Mk k ),I, Ik + C Mk k,,i M k, Ik + C } Mk k. (46) ( ) where any element is of the form I,i k < J,i k < < J M k,i k,i =,,, Ik + C Mk. In lexicographical order the i,j(i < j) elements of (46) satisfy the following relation ( ) I,i k,i,i k,,im k,i k < ( ) I,j k,i,j k,,im k,j k, (47) if and only if the m elements from the left satisfy I l,i k = Jl,j k, l =,,,,m and Im+,i k mapping between the elements of (44) and (46) are given by f : ( Jk, i,ji k,, ) ( ),Ji k,m k I,i k,i,i k,,im k,i k 8 < I m+,j k. Now the, i =,,, I k + C Mk,. (48) On the right most column of the Tables 6 we have shown the rigged configurations for each of the solutions. V. CONCLUSIONS There is a natural correspondence between the solutions of the Bethe ansatz equations for the spin-/ isotropic Heisenberg model to the rigged configurations. We in this paper study this correspondence by a comparison between the sets of the rigged configurations in the co-lexicographical order and the corresponding sets of the Takahashi quantum numbers in the lexicographical order. As an example we consider the N = case, because the solutions in this case starts to exhibit several interesting structures which are not present for any even length chain for N <. For example, there are solutions in which some of the individual odd-length strings are not self-conjugate. These solutions, known non self-conjugate string solutions, have been observed in [] recently. Another type of solutions, we call almost singular string solutions, also start to appear from N =, in which one pair of the rapidities takes the form of eq. (3) with ǫ N. The existence of ǫ N is very much important theoretically in the calculations of the form factors, scalar product of the Bethe states. We obtained the Bethe quantum numbers and the Takahashi quantum numbers, which are essential for the purpose of obtaining a correspondence between the solutions of the Bethe equations and the rigged configurations.
9 TABLE : Bethe roots for N =, M =. There are solutions with one -string. 5..339745965564.8665437844388 4 3..339745965564.8665437844388 6 4..886753459489.4999999999999998 3 5..886753459489.4999999999999998 7 6. 3 3.5 7. 3 3.5 8 8. 4.8665437844386.5 9..8665437844386.5 9. 5 5.8665437844386.3397459655635. 5 5.8665437844386.3397459655635
.. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9.... 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9... TABLE.: Bethe roots for N =, M =. There are 45 solutions with two -strings / /.78894699748664 3.989859478995 8 4 //.78894699748664 8 4 / /.5933757884 3.669656355735 8 3 3/ 3/.4676795993998 8 3 //.5933757884 3.669656355735 8 5 3/ 3/.4676795993998 8 5 / /.784956388 3.64844338467 8 4 3/ 3/.467898554594 8 5 //.784956388 3.64844338467 8 3 3/ 3/.467898554594 8 4 3/ 3/.8343489577763 3.39746789574 8 3 3/ 3/.8343489577763 8 5 / /.54449344495 3.8548355635 8 5/ 5/.46778769587993 8 3 //.54449344495 3.8548355635 8 5 5/ 5/.46778769587993 8 6 / /.85648648587 3.6368759956 8 4 5/ 5/.4536658375674 8 6 //.85648648587 3.6368759956 8 5/ 5/.4536658375674 8 4 3/ 3/.975683544785.956933683 8 5/ 5/.39685589949 8 3/ 3/.975683544785.956933683 8 6 5/ 5/.39685589949 8 6 3/ 3/.36935939894.7989587535 8 3 5/ 5/.43834847884 8 6 3/ 3/.36935939894.7989587535 8 5/ 5/.43834847884 8 5 / /.456536687437.633645356 8 7/ 7/.73755996599763 8 3 //.456536687437.633645356 8 5 7/ 7/.73755996599763 8 7 / /.954895977774773.56345776353 8 4 7/ 7/.73665656787 8 7 //.954895977774773.56345776353 8 7/ 7/.73665656787 8 4 3/ 3/.838764457955.4599585844449 8 7/ 7/.797844693 8 3/ 3/.838764457955.4599585844449 8 6 7/ 7/.797844693 8 7 5/ 5/.433546675347.846967654657 8 5/ 5/.433546675347 8 6
. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 3. 3. 3. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 4. 4. 4. TABLE.: Continued 3/ 3/.46458837343.688933596963 8 3 7/ 7/.747934983477 8 7 3/ 3/.46458837343.688933596963 8 7/ 7/.747934983477 8 5 / /.444358975735.83335974654 8 9/ 9/.56764575878 8 3 //.444358975735.83335974654 8 5 9/ 9/.56764575878 8 8 / /.3957349333.8887964463 8 4 9/ 9/.58498435647 8 8 //.3957349333.8887964463 8 9/ 9/.58498435647 8 4 3/ 3/.645984864534.4 8 9/ 9/.53884768587663 8 3/ 3/.645984864534.4 8 6 9/ 9/.53884768587663 8 8 5/ 5/.3637646845 8 7/ 7/.688996355869 8 5/ 5/.3637646845 8 7 7/ 7/.688996355869 8 7 3/ 3/.6939364645.74798939784 8 3 9/ 9/.689736733 8 8 3/ 3/.6939364645.74798939784 8 9/ 9/.689736733 8 5 5/ 5/.44548944888.78964756593 8 7/ 7/.764659797 8 7 5/ 5/.44548944888.78964756593 8 7/ 7/.764659797 8 6 5/ 5/.39833697635.59363338534 8 9/ 9/.5635763583474 8 5/ 5/.39833697635.59363338534 8 7 9/ 9/.5635763583474 8 8 5/ 5/.46468835937.48359976594 8 9/ 9/.68587784 8 8 5/ 5/.46468835937.48359976594 8 9/ 9/.68587784 8 6 7/ 7/.77858648779.69699739967 8 7/ 7/.77858648779 8 7 7/ 7/.576944869586.7686873945735 8 9/ 9/.44499976979773 8 7/ 7/.576944869586.7686873945735 8 8 9/ 9/.44499976979773 8 8
43. 44. 45. TABLE.: Continued 7/ 7/.849764733598.7477373356968 8 9/ 9/.658397545 8 8 7/ 7/.849764733598.7477373356968 8 9/ 9/.658397545 8 7 9/ 9/.784369444644.374993433763787 8 9/ 9/.784369444644 8 8 46. TABLE.: Bethe roots for N =,M =. There are 9 solutions with one -string 5/.5i 8 4 7/.5i 47. 48. 49. 5. 5. 5. 53. 54. 7/.6794959647894+.49999999643753i 7/.6794959647894.49999999643753i 7/.6794959647894+.49999999643753i 7/.6794959647894.49999999643753i 9/.57693573989+.54785775i 7/.57693573989.54785775i 7/.57693573989+.54785775i 9/.57693573989.54785775i 9/.8463557754+.48834394383i 3 9/.8463557754.48834394383i 9/.8463557754+.48834394383i 3 9/.8463557754.48834394383i /.658785768+.6946655477i 4 9/.658785768.6946655477i 9/.658785768+.6946655477i 4 /.658785768.6946655477i.9333876949 8 3.9333876949 8 5.749454398548 8.749454398548 8 6.59687469934 8.59687469934 8 7.37749688446747 8.37749688446747 8 8
3. TABLE 3.: Bethe roots for N =, M = 3. There are 84 solutions with three -strings.544876987 5.65739954787.544876987..987686739478456.355745875993.37654667797 5.9394783364 3..987686739478456.355745875993.37654667797 5.9394783364 4..6796385699366.7334958957396.33435544645846 5.995997 5..6796385699366.7334958957396.33435544645846 5.995997 6..35588459355.39754733376.6845733786636 5.5756943655 7..35588459355.39754733376.6845733786636 5.5756943655 8..3497595338376.3497595338376 4.776856679 9. 3 3.5958759456473.768534433.93799493975 4.7737563875. 3 3.5958759456473.768534433.93799493975 4.7737563875. 3 3.646358894.77855784396.798387454 4.58435549. 3 3.646358894.77855784396.798387454 4.58435549
4 3. TABLE 3.: Continued.33444948677437.4637777964847 4.5643566954.3547576647 4..33444948677437.4637777964847.3547576647 4.5643566954 5. 3 3.674378484865.744877563387.778756456694 4.4733684755355 6. 3 3.674378484865.744877563387.778756456694 4.4733684755355 7. 3 3.57378447996.993437.364674483733677 4.347477675 8. 3 3.57378447996.993437.364674483733677 4.347477675 9. 3 3.568478546374.83736544666.749494448399 4.39583353393. 3 3.568478546374.83736544666.749494448399 4.39583353393. 4.759465397.434787663.445553534859 4.79888579963 6..759465397.434787663.445553534859 4.79888579963 3. 3 3.66589539678.988893558975.3538788634945 4.64754555 4. 3 3.66589539678.988893558975.3538788634945 4.64754555 5. 3 3.584667834337.98559748798364.847545488553 4.79685344373
5 6. TABLE 3.: Continued 3 3.584667834337.98559748798364 4.79685344373.847545488553 7. 4.38788873365.34955544334.86598453 4.885845997 6 8..38788873365.34955544334.86598453 4.885845997 9. 3 3.63568587545.34645689945.3684375779 3.975639449635 3. 3 3.63568587545.34645689945.3684375779 3.975639449635 3. 3 3.637956999674478.55839645579738.3449449778885 3.93937743894 3. 3 3.637956999674478.55839645579738.3449449778885 3.93937743894 33. 4.8997587767436.856576846657.956448399864 3.98757674478 6 34..8997587767436.856576846657.956448399864 3.98757674478 35. 4.4648576696.6346795454.5847837557866 3.858739738359 6 36..4648576696.6346795454.5847837557866 3.858739738359 37. 4.9378984.56676453.8978534344987 3.89774943785 6 38..9378984.56676453.8978534344987 3.89774943785
6 39. TABLE 3.: Continued 3 3.59665848499.363796839846 3.57765855734.37838863 4. 3 3.59665848499.363796839846.37838863 3.57765855734 4. 4.6658734777.699943576347.9943464773877 3.54645696369 6 4..6658734777.699943576347.9943464773877 3.54645696369 43. 4.3366693434.55886474584.3778777856 3.53353664895 6 44..3366693434.55886474584.3778777856 3.53353664895 45. 3 3.64386749868346 3 3.64386749868346 3.599755643883 46. 4.38775798437544.5674488555.3787896947 3.434537469457 6 47..38775798437544.5674488555.3787896947 3.434537469457 48. 3 3.68344455437473.4394666649 3 3.65764968587 3.36976946353 49. 3 3.68344455437473.4394666649 3 3.65764968587 3.36976946353 5. 4.35868477567.7435346845376.366777638394 3.3454748393746 6 5..35868477567.7435346845376.366777638394 3.3454748393746
7 5. TABLE 3.: Continued 4.6755769433598 6 3 3.485453 3.959995998 6.877358695548 53..6755769433598 3 3.485453.877358695548 3.959995998 54. 4.88998639883 3 3.49399894.584894876478876 3.955643933 6 6 55..88998639883 3 3.49399894.584894876478876 3.955643933 56. 4.86685948.77635653.386737548693 3.4443563853 6 57..86685948.77635653.386737548693 3.4443563853 58. 4.49358463393 3 3.4785677745.374363339854 3.46647334 6 6 6 59..49358463393 3 3.4785677745.374363339854 3.46647334 6. 4.7678865466 3 3.5.7678865475 3 6 6 6..7678865466 3 3.5.7678865475 3 6. 4.359438589487.5484835 3 3.6649883555.9587999879855 6 63..359438589487.5484835 3 3.6649883555.9587999879855 64. 3 3.66653366.365488846994 3 3.664894336775.95386679454884
8 65. TABLE 3.: Continued 3 3.66653366.365488846994.95386679454884 3 3.664894336775 66. 4.3378796875393.48883473379 3 3.6763685744.8345854835675 6 67..3378796875393.48883473379 3 3.6763685744.8345854835675 68. 4.378898996967.5888677768388 3 3.656967833733.797737556 6 69..378898996967.5888677768388 3 3.656967833733.797737556 7. 4.74839595335 3 3.5959935553.3959749399434.49488339363 6 6 7..74839595335 3 3.5959935553.3959749399434.49488339363 7. 4.38555587.8747898397346 3 3.687463789784999.45989379334 6 73..38555587.8747898397346 3 3.687463789784999.45989379334 74. 4.4538734556.4538734556.44944853646555 6 75. 4.3973946757747.3395336839 3 3.6333837899475.3834863557897 6 76..3973946757747.3395336839 3 3.6333837899475.3834863557897
9 77. TABLE 3.: Continued 4.3839354438533 6.38778873547794.3748647374967.4368836373 78..3839354438533.38778873547794 4.4368836373.3748647374967 6 79. 4.4479369787.3438386589.35386744797878.99784543347 6 8..4479369787.3438386589 4.35386744797878.99784543347 6 8. 3 3.7998356 3 3.555665564675.538685555847.978374389348 8. 3 3.7998356 3 3.555665564675 4.538685555847.978374389348 6 6 83. 4.46868565934 3 3.53975598437559.984854386559.39384849377 6 84..46868565934 3 3.53975598437559 4.984854386559.39384849377 6 6
85. TABLE 3.: Bethe roots for N =, M = 3. There are 63 solutions with one -string and one -string 3.5i 3. 3.5i 8 4 86..38769877 4.35693683638+.5434734737i.35693683638.5434734737i.8783873583965 8 4 87..38769877 3.35693683638+.5434734737i.35693683638.5434734737i.8783873583965 8 4 88..5758493735 3.4765853963744+.4999999999999999i 3.4765853963744.4999999999999999i.8835475936 8 3 89..5758493735 3.4765853963744+.4999999999999999i.4765853963744.4999999999999999i.8835475936 8 5 9..8463976639 4.3595887534+.553789398i.3595887534.553789398i.85877743867 8 3 9..8463976639 3.3595887534+.553789398i.3595887534.553789398i.85877743867 8 5 9..898688457 4.37969786853647+.584758464i.37969786853647.584758464i.68967773897 8 5 93..898688457 3.37969786853647+.584758464i.37969786853647.584758464i.68967773897 8 3 94..75465747 4.74396769588+.495953437643i.74396769588.495953437643i.677933834587 8 3 95..75465747.74396769588+.495953437643i.74396769588.495953437643i.677933834587 8 5 96..6476479479567 4.76865793844+.495477664435i.76865793844.495477664435i.64964644853 8 4 97..6476479479567.76865793844+.495477664435i.76865793844.495477664435i.64964644853 8 4 98..9369466795377 4.59933477676+.59454766i.59933477676.59454766i.43673678886 8 99..9369466795377 3.59933477676+.59454766i.59933477676.59454766i.43673678886 8 6
. TABLE 3.: (Continued).346484377648 3.84765538984+.4999999999997747i.3445993576479.84765538984.4999999999997747i 8 6..346484377648 3.84765538984+.4999999999997747i 3.84765538984.4999999999997747i.3445993576479 8..3373388647 4.765898454+.4968335757i.765898454.4968335757i.387938683557 8 3..3373388647.765898454+.4968335757i.765898454.4968335757i.387938683557 8 6 4..34655676458 4.798643945436+.49463335889i.798643945436.49463335889i.3679887658 8 5 5..34655676458.798643945436+.49463335889i.798643945436.49463335889i.3679887658 8 3 6..567956398554.335765748+.5784435433i 3 5.335765748.5784435433i.35798835635 8 5 7..567956398554 5.335765748+.5784435433i 3.335765748.5784435433i.35798835635 6 8 3 8..85548659775 5.34564339767534+.5798563577i 3.34564339767534.5798563577i.669698537 6 8 4 9..85548659775.34564339767534+.5798563577i 3 5.34564339767534.5798563577i.669698537 8 4..377976974445868 4.4577764836+.545384944i.4577764836+.545384944i.3786979 8 6..377976974445868 3.4577764836+.545384944i.4577764836+.545384944i.3786979 8..954334534.958386556+.57676847369839i 3 5.958386556.57676847369839i.6896388865 8 6 3..954334534 5.958386556+.57676847369839i 3.958386556.57676847369839i.6896388865 6 8 4..337645356778.366867793334+.5835389998i 3 5.366867793334.5835389998i.95385886337 8 3 5..337645356778 5.366867793334+.5835389998i 3.366867793334.5835389998i.95385886337 6 8 5
6. TABLE 3.: (Continued).4394884654456.838876649578+.49395387337657i.8345347495.838876649578.49395387337657i 8 7..4394884654456 4.838876649578+.49395387337657i.838876649578.49395387337657i.8345347495 8 6 8. 3 3.584386958663 4.86567455665+.534483874i.86567455665.534483874i.8786849899384 8 9. 3 3.584386958663 3.86567455665+.534483874i.86567455665.534483874i.8786849899384 8 7. 3 3.4664578385479946 4.66896455453+.498544794794i.66896455453.498544794794i.793757395 8. 3 3.4664578385479946.66896455453+.498544794794i.66896455453.498544794794i.793757395 8 7. 3 3.63958674597677 3.37464474798+.499999999989i.37464474798.499999999989i.7444459398464 8 7 3. 3 3.63958674597677 3.37464474798+.499999999989i 3.37464474798.499999999989i.7444459398464 8 4. 3 3.3834743383577 5.59886384598+.57474596677i 3.59886384598.57474596677i.648493793836 6 8 5. 3 3.3834743383577.59886384598+.57474596677i 3 5.59886384598.57474596677i.648493793836 8 7 6. 3 3.67638577589 4.435349373835+.5538793i.435349373835.5538793i.5475546793 8 7 7. 3 3.67638577589 3.435349373835+.5538793i.435349373835.5538793i.5475546793 8 8..47697589755 5.3937854467+.583993597743i 3.3937854467.583993597743i.468555394585 6 8 6 9..47697589755.3937854467+.583993597743i 3 5.3937854467.583993597743i.468555394585 8 3. 3 3.797796497365 4.845464557639+.49953634377i.845464557639.49953634377i.588453336853 8 7 3. 3 3.797796497365.845464557639+.49953634377i.845464557639.49953634377i.588453336853 8
3 3. TABLE 3.: (Continued).8639799446577 3.936846774865674+.54663i.573646648.936846774865674.54663i 8 8 33. 4.8639799446577 4.936846774865674+.54663i.936846774865674.54663i.573646648 8 34..358335853 3.75757946883947+.49999999933i.75757946883947.49999999933i.97347859463 8 8 35. 4.358335853 3.75757946883947+.49999999933i 3.75757946883947.49999999933i.97347859463 8 36..747394856.47365663899456+.49997478543644i.47365663899456.49997478543644i.5443738669 8 8 37. 4.747394856 4.47365663899456+.49997478543644i.47365663899456.49997478543644i.5443738669 8 38. 4.7569744 5.84669544+.56866634374349i 3.84669544.56866634374349i.4475569666766 6 8 39..7569744.84669544+.56866634374349i 3 5.84669544.56866634374349i.4475569666766 8 8 4..4773539678696 4.478444356576+.55475856754i.478444356576.55475856754i.347465884657 8 8 4. 4.4773539678696 3.478444356576+.55475856754i.478444356576.55475856754i.347465884657 8 4. 3 3.7434864947544377 5.44943749837+.5857864835668i 3.44943749837.5857864835668i.99975355473 6 8 7 43. 3 3.7434864947544377.44943749837+.5857864835668i 3 5.44943749837.5857864835668i.99975355473 8 44..4774986457854 4.888649667854+.497548996397i.888649667854+.497548996397i.7766338479 8 8 45. 4.4774986457854.888649667854+.497548996397i.888649667854+.497548996397i.7766338479 8 46..5449433356464 5.47485348498+.59388899484i 3.47485348498.59388899484i.4763438773934 6 8 8 47. 4.5449433356464.47485348498+.59388899484i 3 5.47485348498.59388899484i.4763438773934 8
4 48. TABLE 3.3: Bethe roots for N =, M = 3. There are 7 solutions with one 3-string 5.99938i 3.6667684994 5.99938i 49. 5. 5. 5. 53. 54. 6.4594365449885+.39646667i 3.47368554675 5.4594365449885.39646667i 5.4594365449885+.39646667i 3.47368554675 6.4594365449885.39646667i 6.8567463438548+.7668593i 3 3.85738489695 5.8567463438548.7668593i 5.8567463438548+.7668593i 3 3.85738489695 6.8567463438548.7668593i 6.38995363856644+.6994933946i 4 3 3.467454758867 5.38995363856644.6994933946i 5.38995363856644+.6994933946i 3.467454758867.38995363856644.6994933946i.6744965869.6744965869.4974569364.4974569364.35876446893 6.35876446893
5. TABLE 4.: Bethe roots for N =, M = 4. There are 7 solutions with four -strings 3/ 3/.563663883987 / /.787498499599 7.759359635 //.787498499599 3/ 3/.563663883987. 5/ 5/.4677635934457 3/ 3/.93977937634 / /.48544973696699 //.8559697557 6.637464577386 3. 5/ 5/.4677635934457 3/ 3/.93977937634 //.48544973696699 / /.8559697557 6.637464577386 4. 5/ 5/.588386759 / /.6876944835436 //.8764656849699473 3/ 3/.659959498687 6.45776893496 5. 5/ 5/.588386759 //.6876944835436 / /.8764656849699473 3/ 3/.659959498687 6.45776893496 6. 5/ 5/.4774866889937856 3/ 3/.668494474988 / /.55533958687 3/ 3/.875994469 6.989534794833 7. 5/ 5/.4774866889937856 3/ 3/.668494474988 //.55533958687 3/ 3/.875994469 6.989534794833 8. 5/ 5/.4885676784 3/ 3/.33874493898557 //.94343376666565 3/ 3/.7373486668385 6.348799453 9. 5/ 5/.4885676784 3/ 3/.33874493898557 / /.94343376666565 3/ 3/.7373486668385 6.348799453. 7/ 7/.999978448 3/ 3/.97687795494574 / /.33365755537 //.49974686 6.9769566765
6. TABLE 4.: (Continued) 7/ 7/.999978448 3/ 3/.97687795494574 6.9769566765 //.33365755537 / /.49974686. 5/ 5/.549748665748 / /.7758743733 //.7758743733 5/ 5/.549748665748 5.847873476953 3. 3/ 3/.895347884444 / /.78783583 //.5445573533 7/ 7/.646447545 5.7839793 4. 3/ 3/.895347884444 //.78783583 / /.5445573533 7/ 7/.646447545 5.7839793 5. 3/ 3/.964339499537 //.399937376874 3/ 3/.4367394475 7/ 7/.873854388 5.56993473953 6. 3/ 3/.964339499537 / /.399937376874 3/ 3/.4367394475 7/ 7/.873854388 5.56993473953 7. 5/ 5/.53695575895 //.64534775444 3/ 3/.359736549 5/ 5/.49398949546 5.55969435585 8. 5/ 5/.53695575895 / /.64534775444 3/ 3/.359736549 5/ 5/.49398949546 5.55969435585 9. 5/ 5/.574688679 3/ 3/.4373399948877 //.8443493874 5/ 5/.5555679783 5.59886379. 5/ 5/.574688679 3/ 3/.4373399948877 / /.8443493874 5/ 5/.5555679783 5.59886379. 7/ 7/.95779983543757 5/ 5/.47748833499996 / /.539795659699 //.967444573984 5.49895943848788
7. TABLE 4.: (Continued) 7/ 7/.95779983543757 5/ 5/.47748833499996 5.49895943848788 //.539795659699 / /.967444573984 3. 7/ 7/.9574448986879 5/ 5/.38949369368473 3/ 3/.7443475 / /.3738649995 5.48654598474 4. 7/ 7/.9574448986879 5/ 5/.38949369368473 3/ 3/.7443475 //.3738649995 5.48654598474 5. 7/ 7/.386573437 3/ 3/.665634963 //.89377493554 3/ 3/.88449984459 5.485395638 6. 7/ 7/.386573437 3/ 3/.665634963 / /.89377493554 3/ 3/.88449984459 5.485395638 7. 7/ 7/.9343368384563696 5/ 5/.39789539565 3/ 3/.858679888 //.364439553844 5.396683883 8. 7/ 7/.9343368384563696 5/ 5/.39789539565 3/ 3/.858679888 / /.364439553844 5.396683883 9. 7/ 7/.8894883 / /.68389983455 //.953498493837865 5/ 5/.5346979548947 5.873877443 3. 7/ 7/.8894883 //.68389983455 / /.953498493837865 5/ 5/.5346979548947 5.873877443 3. 5/ 5/.5647599 3/ 3/.546463349534 3/ 3/.546463349534 5/ 5/.5647599 5.538539343 3. 7/ 7/.976533938498 5/ 5/.4656654668765 / /.3857555 3/ 3/.348698864835 5.4567475
8 33. TABLE 4.: (Continued) 7/ 7/.976533938498 5/ 5/.4656654668765 5.4567475 //.3857555 3/ 3/.348698864835 34. 7/ 7/.995486676993 5/ 5/.455536434 //.553789934665 3/ 3/.96854938679676 4.949957536 35. 7/ 7/.995486676993 5/ 5/.455536434 / /.553789934665 3/ 3/.96854938679676 4.949957536 36. 7/ 7/.44539863545 3/ 3/.333367456433 / /.489583937 5/ 5/.55653963679474 4.94533675755969 37. 7/ 7/.44539863545 3/ 3/.333367456433 //.489583937 5/ 5/.55653963679474 4.94533675755969 38. 7/ 7/.68583599957 3/ 3/.996583496658 //.9775984936938 5/ 5/.54549679697488 4.87896956776 39. 7/ 7/.68583599957 3/ 3/.996583496658 / /.9775984936938 5/ 5/.54549679697488 4.87896956776 4. 7/ 7/.7997795559 //.786549589335 3/ 3/.5476387466 5/ 5/.593867677973 4.868853389367 4. 7/ 7/.7997795559 / /.786549589335 3/ 3/.5476387466 5/ 5/.593867677973 4.868853389367 4. 5/ 5/.553957369 3/ 3/.5757457838334 //.6756553684394 7/ 7/.69964753784 4.8443346346 43. 5/ 5/.553957369 3/ 3/.5757457838334 / /.6756553684394 7/ 7/.69964753784 4.8443346346
9 44. TABLE 4.: (Continued) 7/ 7/.9586695449998 5/ 5/.4669544398983 4.873434 3/ 3/.87593869853 3/ 3/.33938344584 45. 7/ 7/.9586695449998 5/ 5/.4669544398983 3/ 3/.87593869853 3/ 3/.33938344584 4.873434 46. 7/ 7/.64698664853 / /.7496534733668 //.7496534733668 7/ 7/.64698664853 4.577465578765 47. 7/ 7/.857664699364 3/ 3/.688358885 3/ 3/.6464364476 5/ 5/.5334735769767 4.55768957875 48. 7/ 7/.857664699364 3/ 3/.688358885 3/ 3/.6464364476 5/ 5/.5334735769767 4.55768957875 49. 5/ 5/.567976799587 //.449567544998 5/ 5/.473878543787 7/ 7/.99976688359 4.4673376 5. 5/ 5/.567976799587 / /.449567544998 5/ 5/.473878543787 7/ 7/.99976688359 4.4673376 5. 5/ 5/.5563494546545 / /.596344663469 5/ 5/.43595697639 7/ 7/.79968974 4.33473356474 5. 5/ 5/.5563494546545 //.596344663469 5/ 5/.43595697639 7/ 7/.79968974 4.33473356474 53. 7/ 7/.64643458833 //.68764958 3/ 3/.78673473975 7/ 7/.844973 4.99646685 54. 7/ 7/.64643458833 / /.68764958 3/ 3/.78673473975 7/ 7/.844973 4.99646685
3 55. TABLE 4.: (Continued) 7/ 7/.44333446935346 / /.84684594 4.5347675393 3/ 3/.33695484367983 7/ 7/.99754548566437 56. 7/ 7/.44333446935346 //.84684594 3/ 3/.33695484367983 7/ 7/.99754548566437 4.5347675393 57. 7/ 7/.97549579596 5/ 5/.4775648456 3/ 3/.96453959399577 5/ 5/.5783694575494 4.835337396635 58. 7/ 7/.97549579596 5/ 5/.4775648456 3/ 3/.96453959399577 5/ 5/.5783694575494 4.835337396635 59. 7/ 7/.36589866 5/ 5/.444477966898 3/ 3/.76857536357 5/ 5/.5497694438987 3.95746487775866 6. 7/ 7/.36589866 5/ 5/.444477966898 3/ 3/.76857536357 5/ 5/.5497694438987 3.95746487775866 6. 7/ 7/.7763795646 3/ 3/.4339936345 3/ 3/.4339936345 7/ 7/.7763795646 3.9633643694565 6. 7/ 7/.35975796773957 5/ 5/.44374696449 / /.5559988554389 7/ 7/.846465858757 3.775433688433 63. 7/ 7/.35975796773957 5/ 5/.44374696449 //.5559988554389 7/ 7/.846465858757 3.775433688433 64. 7/ 7/.546584499366 5/ 5/.459899436 //.884784699788 7/ 7/.64583633 3.7798665399543 65. 7/ 7/.546584499366 5/ 5/.459899436 / /.884784699788 7/ 7/.64583633 3.7798665399543
3 66. TABLE 4.: (Continued) 7/ 7/.8347449464 3/ 3/.9977394374454 3.594694364594 5/ 5/.433585646594 7/ 7/.9837954899 67. 7/ 7/.8347449464 3/ 3/.9977394374454 5/ 5/.433585646594 7/ 7/.9837954899 3.594694364594 68. 7/ 7/.375565975783 3/ 3/.479455698985 5/ 5/.46648386343 7/ 7/.79786937 3.368747536 69. 7/ 7/.375565975783 3/ 3/.479455698985 5/ 5/.46648386343 7/ 7/.79786937 3.368747536 7. 7/ 7/.998456 5/ 5/.4699937894773 5/ 5/.4699937894773 7/ 7/.998456.87696437384 7. TABLE 4.: Bethe roots for N =, M = 4. There are 4 solutions with two -strings and one -string / /.8993566348453 //.8993566348453 4.89549854696 5/.5i 7/.5i 7. 3/ 3/.685575665894 / /.7975334364 5/.74454355939+.544i 7/.74454355939.544i 4.563577973686 73. 3/ 3/.685575665894 //.7975334364 7/.74454355939+.544i 5/.74454355939.544i 4.563577973686
3 74. TABLE 4.: (Continued) 3/ 3/.6446555687 //.84477748855 4.5697866 5/.636844595665+.53i 7/.636844595665.53i 75. 3/ 3/.6446555687 / /.84477748855 5/.636844595665+.53i 7/.636844595665.53i 4.5697866 76. 3/ 3/.659378595684 3/ 3/.659378595684 5/.5i 7/.5i 4.88676373 77. 5/ 5/.58596469893 / /.73783333667393 5/.6595733684367+.59753i 7/.6595733684367.59753i 3.894747843358 78. 5/ 5/.58596469893 //.73783333667393 7/.6595733684367+.59753i 5/.6595733684367.59753i 3.894747843358 79. 5/ 5/.54834334656 //.856398675455 5/.6897745658+.53697i 7/.6897745658.53697i 3.884556948 8. 5/ 5/.54834334656 / /.856398675455 7/.6897745658+.53697i 5/.6897745658.53697i 3.884556948 8. 5/ 5/.573335943437 3/ 3/.4577847936754 5/.5587948879+.59686433i 7/.5587948879.59686433i 3.5558379837 8. 5/ 5/.573335943437 3/ 3/.4577847936754 7/.5587948879+.59686433i 5/.5587948879.59686433i 3.5558379837 83. 5/ 5/.593984867 3/ 3/.696563746 5/.5853736493+.59i 7/.5853736493.59i 3.49444746675 84. 5/ 5/.593984867 3/ 3/.696563746 7/.5853736493+.59i 5/.5853736493.59i 3.49444746675 85. 7/ 7/.7887785363 / /.666649755845 5/.356857645+.543637663i 7/.356857645.543637663i 3.6449749546 6 86. 7/ 7/.7887785363 //.666649755845 7/.356857645+.543637663i 5/.356857645.543637663i 3.6449749546
33 87. TABLE 4.: (Continued) 7/ 7/.476456633 //.935535797635 3.35745436635 5/.87375546783+.54736i 6 7/.87375546783.54736i 88. 7/ 7/.476456633 / /.935535797635 7/.87375546783+.54736i 5/.87375546783.54736i 3.35745436635 89. 7/ 7/.7933996655 3/ 3/.5594578466 5/.5756966396+.584743i 7/.5756966396.584743i.9534846493379 6 9. 7/ 7/.7933996655 3/ 3/.5594578466 7/.5756966396+.584743i 5/.5756966396.584743i.9534846493379 9. 5/ 5/.535534448344 5/ 5/.535534448344 5/.5i 7/.5i.8694338868 9. 7/ 7/.5777557599 3/ 3/.7635394499443 5/.4877+.5545957i 7/.4877.5545957i.84655659358 6 93. 7/ 7/.5777557599 3/ 3/.7635394499443 7/.4877+.5545957i 5/.4877.5545957i.84655659358 94. 7/ 7/.3873668936 5/ 5/.446553935765 5/.877686437898+.55338563i 7/.877686437898.55338563i.4587743374875 6 6 95. 7/ 7/.3873668936 5/ 5/.446553935765 7/.877686437898+.55338563i 5/.877686437898.55338563i.4587743374875 96. 7/ 7/.38544643573 5/ 5/.547557367355786 5/.6455563796+.57i 7/.6455563796.57i.86988846 6 97. 7/ 7/.38544643573 5/ 5/.547557367355786 7/.6455563796+.57i 5/.6455563796.57i.86988846 98. 7/ 7/.65764747898 7/ 7/.65764747898 5/.5i 7/.5i.657698986 6