ABSTRACT. closed sets, fuzzy locally regular closed sets, and fuzzy locally G δ. continuous functions

Similar documents
Maximilian GANSTER. appeared in: Soochow J. Math. 15 (1) (1989),

frg Connectedness in Fine- Topological Spaces

ON MAXIMAL, MINIMAL OPEN AND CLOSED SETS

ON PRE-I-OPEN SETS, SEMI-I-OPEN SETS AND b-i-open SETS IN IDEAL TOPOLOGICAL SPACES 1. Erdal Ekici

ON Fuzzy Infra-Semiopen Sets

On Fuzzy Semi-Pre-Generalized Closed Sets

ON STRONGLY PRE-OPEN SETS AND A DECOMPOSITION OF CONTINUITY. Chandan Chattopadhyay

Upper and Lower Rarely α-continuous Multifunctions

On bτ-closed sets. Maximilian Ganster and Markus Steiner

Recent Progress in the Theory of Generalized Closed Sets

A DECOMPOSITION OF CONTINUITY IN IDEAL BY USING SEMI-LOCAL FUNCTIONS

Decomposition of Locally Closed Sets in Topological Spaces

ON GENERALIZED CLOSED SETS

Available at: pocetna.html ON A GENERALIZATION OF NORMAL, ALMOST NORMAL AND MILDLY NORMAL SPACES II

SUPRA PAIRWISE CONNECTED AND PAIRWISE SEMI-CONNECTED SPACES

On Decompositions of Continuity and α-continuity

Note on contra nano gb-closed maps

ON PC-COMPACT SPACES

TRANSITIVE AND ABSORBENT FILTERS OF LATTICE IMPLICATION ALGEBRAS

On Neutrosophic Semi-Open sets in Neutrosophic Topological Spaces

On Irresolute Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multifunctions

Between strong continuity and almost continuity

Fuzzy Supra S-Open And S-Closed Mappings

Common Fixed Point Theorems on Fuzzy Metric Spaces Using Implicit Relation

M. Suraiya Begum, M. Sheik John IJSRE Volume 4 Issue 6 June 2016 Page 5466

(i,j)-quasi Semi Weakly g*- Closed Functions in Bitopological Spaces

On Pre-γ-I-Open Sets In Ideal Topological Spaces

Somewhere Dense Sets and ST 1 -Spaces

Constructions of Q-BI Fuzzy Ideals Over Sub Semi- Groups with Respect to (T,S) Norms

Contra-Pre-Semi-Continuous Functions

GENERALIZED NEIGHBOURHOOD SYSTEMS OF FUZZY POINTS

On z-θ-open Sets and Strongly θ-z-continuous Functions

C. CARPINTERO, N. RAJESH, E. ROSAS AND S. SARANYASRI

On Fuzzy Automata Homotopy

Decomposition of continuity via b-open set. Contents. 1 introduction Decompositions of continuity 60

Upper and Lower α I Continuous Multifunctions

More on sg-compact spaces

Intuitionistic fuzzy gα**-closed sets

Generalized Near Rough Connected Topologized Approximation Spaces

rgα-interior and rgα-closure in Topological Spaces

A new class of generalized delta semiclosed sets using grill delta space

On generalized open fuzzy sets. Ratna Dev Sarma, A. Sharfuddin, Anubha Bhargava

ON GENERALIZED FUZZY STRONGLY SEMICLOSED SETS IN FUZZY TOPOLOGICAL SPACES

On Some Results in Fuzzy Metric Spaces

Some Stronger Forms of g µ b continuous Functions

S p -Separation Axioms

OF TOPOLOGICAL SPACES. Zbigniew Duszyński. 1. Preliminaries

On Certain Generalizations of Fuzzy Boundary

Characterisation of Nano generalized β closed sets in Nano topological spaces

On Preclosed Sets and Their Generalizations

-HYPERCONNECTED IDEAL TOPOLOGICAL SPACES

Fuzzy Soft Topology. G. Kalpana and C. Kalaivani Department of Mathematics, SSN College of Engineering, Kalavakkam , Chennai, India.

On Generalized gp*- Closed Set. in Topological Spaces

ON α REGULAR ω LOCALLY CLOSED SETS İN TOPOLOGİCAL SPACES

Generalized Star Closed Sets In Interior Minimal Spaces

@FMI c Kyung Moon Sa Co.

Bangladesh; Bangladesh; Bangladesh

p -Closure Operator and p -Regularity in Fuzzy Setting

Applications of -Closed Sets in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Topological Space

A new classes of open mappings

Supra β-connectedness on Topological Spaces

On rps-separation axioms

Contra θ-c-continuous Functions

On Generalized Topology and Minimal Structure Spaces

International Journal of Mathematical Engineering and Science ISSN : Volume 1 Issue 4 (April 2012)

LOCAL CONNECTEDNESS AND CONNECTED OPEN FUNCTIONS

Supra g-closed Sets in Supra Bitopological Spaces

ON QUASI-FUZZY H-CLOSED SPACE AND CONVERGENCE. Yoon Kyo-Chil and Myung Jae-Duek

Jordan Journal of Mathematics and Statistics (JJMS) 9(3), 2016, pp

- Fuzzy Subgroups. P.K. Sharma. Department of Mathematics, D.A.V. College, Jalandhar City, Punjab, India

Applied Mathematics and Sciences: An International Journal (MathSJ ), Vol. 2, No. 1, March Tamil Nadu, India. Tamil Nadu, India.

Contra Pre-I-Continuous Functions

Neutrosophic Resolvable and Neutrosophic Irresolvable Spaces

Fuzzy Almost Contra rw-continuous Functions in Topological Spaces

On Intuitionitic Fuzzy Maximal Ideals of. Gamma Near-Rings

w-preopen Sets and W -Precontinuity in Weak Spaces

On Almost Supra N-continuous Function

On Neutrosophic α-supra Open Sets and Neutrosophic α-supra Continuous Functions

[Selvi* et al., 5(8): August, 2016] ISSN: IC Value: 3.00 Impact Factor: 4.116

On p-closed spaces. Julian Dontchev, Maximilian Ganster and Takashi Noiri

M. Caldas and S. Jafari. ON SEMI δs-irresolute FUNCTIONS. 1. Introduction and preliminaries

F A S C I C U L I M A T H E M A T I C I

@FMI c Kyung Moon Sa Co.

On Base for Generalized Topological Spaces

Ultra Upper And Lower Contra Continuous Multifunction

On totally g μ b Continuous functions in supra topological spaces

On Fuzzy Semi and Spaces on Fuzzy Topological Space on Fuzzy set حول شبه الفضاءات الضبابية و على الفضاء التبولوجي الضبابي وعلى مجموعة ضبابية

ON ALMOST (ω)regular SPACES

Subalgebras and ideals in BCK/BCI-algebras based on Uni-hesitant fuzzy set theory

A study on gr*-closed sets in Bitopological Spaces

Soft -Closed Sets In Soft Čech Closure Space

Common Fixed Point Theorem Satisfying Implicit Relation On Menger Space.

ON FUZZY IDEALS OF PSEUDO MV -ALGEBRAS

Common Fixed Point Theorems for Six Mappings Satisfying Almost Generalized (S, T)-Contractive Condition in Partially Ordered Metric Spaces

A NEW APPROACH TO SEPARABILITY AND COMPACTNESS IN SOFT TOPOLOGICAL SPACES

The Space of Maximal Ideals in an Almost Distributive Lattice

An Introduction to Fuzzy Soft Graph

CONNECTEDNESS IN IDEAL TOPOLOGICAL SPACES

On Maximal Soft -open (Minimal soft -closed) Sets in Soft Topological Spaces

Slightly gγ-continuous Functions

Transcription:

American J. of Mathematics and Sciences Vol., No -,(January 204) Copyright Mind Reader Publications ISSN No: 2250-02 A STUDY ON FUZZY LOCALLY G δ Dr. B.AMUDHAMBIGAI Assistant Professor of Mathematics Department of Mathematics Sri Sarada College for Women, Salem-6 TamilNadu, India. rbamudha@yahoo.co.in A. KARTHIKA Sri Sarada College for Women, Salem-6 B. TamilNadu, India. ABSTRACT In this paper the concept of fuzzy locally G δ -closed sets is introduced and its interrelations with other types of locally closed sets are studied with suitable counter examples. Equivalently the interrelations of fuzzy locally G δ continuous functions with other types of fuzzy locally continuous functions are discussed with necessary counter examples. Key words fuzzy locally G δ closed sets, fuzzy locally regular closed sets, and fuzzy locally G δ continuous functions 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification : 54A40, 0E72. INTRODUCTION AND PRELIMINARIES The concept of fuzzy set was introduced by Zadeh [0] in his classical paper. The concept of fuzzy topological spaces was introduced and developed by Chang [6]. Fuzzy sets have applications in many fields such as information [8] and control [9]. The first step of locally closedness was done by Bourbaki [5]. Ganster and Reilly used locally closed sets in [7] to define Lc-continuity and Lc-connectedness. The concepts of r-fuzzy- G δ - g ~ -locally closed sets and fuzzy G δ - g ~ -locally continuous functions were studied by Amudhambigai, Uma and Roja []. In this paper the concept of fuzzy locally G δ -closed sets is introduced and its interrelations with other types of locally closed sets are studied with suitable counter examples. Equivalently the interrelations of fuzzy locally G δ continuous functions with other types of fuzzy locally continuous functions are discussed with necessary counter examples. Definition. Let (X, T) be a fuzzy topological spaces. Any fuzzy set I X is called (i) a fuzzy regular closed set [2]of X if = cl(int( )), (ii) a fuzzy regular open set [2] of X if = int (cl ( )), (iii) a fuzzy F σ set [] if = i i, where T, (v) a fuzzy pre- i closed set [4] if,, where T, (iv) a fuzzy G i i δ set [] if = cl (int ( )), (vi) a fuzzy - closed set [4] if cl( int(cl ( )) ). i 2.ON FUZZY LOCALLY G δ CLOSED SETS Definition 2. Let ( X, T ) be a fuzzy topological space. Any IX is called a fuzzy locally closed set ( briefly, FLcs ) if =, where is fuzzy open and is fuzzy closed. Its complement is said to be a fuzzy locally open set. 2

A STUDY ON FUZZY LOCALLY G δ Definition 2.2 Let (X, T) be a fuzzy topological space. Any IX is called a fuzzy locally regular closed set (briefly, FLrcs) if =, where is fuzzy open and is fuzzy regular closed. Its complement is said to be a fuzzy locally regular open set. Proposition 2. Every fuzzy locally regular closed set is fuzzy locally closed. Remark 2. The converse of the above Proposition. need not be true. Example 2. Every fuzzy locally closed set need not be fuzzy locally regular closed. Let X={a, b} and let,, 2 IX be defined as follows: ( a ) = 0., ( b ) = 0.2; ( a ) = 0.5, ( b ) = 0.8; ( a ) = 0.4, 2 2 ( b ) = 0.7. Define the fuzzy topology on X as T = { 0,,,, }. Clearly, (X, T) is a fuzzy 2 topological space. Then, for T, = ( 0.4, 0. ) = is fuzzy locally closed. But is not fuzzy regular closed and also is not a fuzzy locally regular closed set. Therefore, every fuzzy locally closed set need not be fuzzy locally regular closed. Definition 2. Let (X,T) be a fuzzy topological space. Any IX is called a fuzzy locally G δ closed set ( briefly, FLG δ cs ) if = fuzzy locally F σ open set., where is fuzzy G and is fuzzy closed. Its complement is said to be a δ Proposition 2.2 Every fuzzy locally regular closed set is fuzzy locally G δ closed. Remark 2.2 The converse of the above Proposition 2.2 need not be true. Example 2.2 Every fuzzy locally G δ closed set need not be fuzzy locally regular closed. Let X = [0, ] and let (n) IX be define as (n) = 2n 8n 2, ( n )}. Now, ( X, T ) is a fuzzy topological space. Then,, where n =,2. Define the fuzzy topology as follows: T = {0, = n (n) = 4 is fuzzy G δ.thus = is fuzzy locally G δ closed. But, is not a fuzzy locally regular closed set. Hence every fuzzy locally G δ closed set need not be fuzzy locally regular closed. Proposition 2. Every fuzzy locally closed set is fuzzy locally G δ closed. Remark 2. The converse of the above Proposition 2. need not be true. Example 2. Every fuzzy locally G δ closed set need not be fuzzy locally closed. Let X = [ 0, ] and let ( n ) IX be define as ( n ) = n, where 7n n =, 2. Define the fuzzy topology as T = { 0,, ( n ) }. Now, ( X, T ) is a fuzzy topological space. Then, for the fuzzy G δ set = fuzzy locally closed. n ( n ) = 7, = is fuzzy locally G δ closed. But, is not Definition.4 Let ( X, T ) be a fuzzy topological space. Any IX is called a fuzzy locally pre-closed set ( briefly, FLpcs ) if =, where is fuzzy open and is fuzzy pre-closed. Its complement is said to be fuzzy locally pre-open. Proposition 2.4 Every fuzzy locally closed set is fuzzy locally pre-closed. Remark 2.4 The converse of the above Proposition 2.4 need not be true. Example 2.4 Every fuzzy locally pre-closed set need not be fuzzy locally closed. Let X = { a, b } and let, IX be defined as follows: ( a ) = 0.2, ( b ) = 0.; 2 ( a ) = 0., 2 ( b ) = 0.4; ( a ) = 0.85,, 2 ( b ) = 0.75. Define the fuzzy topology on X as T = { 0,,,, }. Clearly, ( X, T ) is a fuzzy 2 topological space. Let IX be defined as ( a ) = 0.8; ( b ) = 0.9. Then is fuzzy pre-closed. Thus = ( 0.8, 0.75 ) = is fuzzy locally pre-closed. But, is not fuzzy locally closed. 24

Dr. B.AMUDHAMBIGAI & KARTHIKA Definition 2.5 Let ( X, T ) be a fuzzy topological space. Any I X is called a fuzzy locally - closed set ( briefly, FL - cs ) if =, where is fuzzy open and is fuzzy - closed. Its complement is said to be fuzzy locally - open. Proposition 2.5 Every fuzzy locally closed set is fuzzy locally - closed. Remark 2.5 The converse of the above Proposition 2.5 need not be true. Example 2.5 Every fuzzy locally - closed set need not be fuzzy locally closed. Let X = { a, b } and let,, 2 IX be defined as follows: ( a ) = 0.8, ( b ) = 0.85; ( a ) = 0.5, ( b ) = 0.; 2 2 ( a ) = 0., ( b ) = 0.. Define the fuzzy topology on X as T = { 0,,,, }. Clearly, (X, T) is a 2 fuzzy topological space. Let IX be defined as is fuzzy - closed. Thus, for any T, = - closed. But, is not a fuzzy locally closed set. Proposition 2.6 Every fuzzy locally -closed set is fuzzy locally pre-closed. Remark 2.6 The converse of the above Proposition 2.6 need not be true. Example 2.6 Every fuzzy locally pre-closed set need not be fuzzy locally - closed. Let X = { a, b } and let, 2, IX be defined as follows: ( a ) = 0.2, ( b ) = 0.; 2 ( a ) = 0., 2 ( b ) = 0.4; ( a ) = 0.85, ( b ) = 0.75. Define the fuzzy topology as T = { 0,,, 2, }. Clearly, ( X, T ) is a fuzzy topological space. Let IX be defined as ( a ) = 0.8, for T, ( b ) = 0.9. Then is fuzzy pre-closed. Thus, = = (0.8, 0.75) is fuzzy locally pre-closed. But is not fuzzy locally - closed. Remark 2.7 The notions of fuzzy locally Gδ closed sets and fuzzy locally - closed sets are independent. Example 2.7 Let X = [ 0, ] and let ( n ) I X be define as ( n ) = n, where n =, 2. Define 8n+ the fuzzy topology as T = {0,, (n)}. Clearly, (X, T) is a fuzzy topological space. Then, = fuzzy G δ. Thus for the fuzzy G δ set and for the fuzzy closed set, = = 6 n (n)= 6 is = is fuzzy locally Gδ 6 closed. But, is not fuzzy locally - closed. Hence, every fuzzy locally G δ closed set need not be fuzzy locally - closed. Example 2.8 Let X = {a, b} and let,, 2 IX be defined as follows: ( a ) = 0., ( b ) = 0.; 2 ( a ) = 0.5, 2 ( b ) = 0.; ( a ) = 0.8, ( b ) = 0.85. Define the fuzzy topology as T = { 0,,, 2, }. Clearly, ( X, T ) is a fuzzy topological space. Let Then is fuzzy - closed. Thus, for any T, IX be defined as ( a ) = 0.7, ( b ) = 0.8. = is fuzzy locally - closed. But, is not a fuzzy locally closed set and hence not fuzzy locally G δ closed. Therefore, every fuzzy locally - closed set need not be fuzzy locally G δ closed. Hence every fuzzy locally G closed sets and fuzzy locally δ - closed sets are of independent notions. Remark 2.8 Clearly the above discussions give the following implications :.ON FUZZY LOCALLY G δ CONTINUOUS FUNCTIONS 25

A STUDY ON FUZZY LOCALLY G δ Definition. Let ( X, T ) be a fuzzy topological space. For any fuzzy set of X, the fuzzy locally preclosure of and the fuzzy locally pre-interior of are defined respectively, as FLp-cl ( ) = { is a fuzzy locally pre-closed set} and FLp-int ( ) = { : I X :, is a fuzzy locally pre- ; open set }. Proposition. Let ( X, T ) and ( Y, S ) be any two fuzzy topological spaces. Then for any function f : ( X, T ) ( Y, S ) the following statements are equivalent: (a) f is fuzzy locally pre- (b) For every IX, f ( FLpcl ( ) ) cl ( f ( ) ). (c) For every IY, f ( cl ( ) ) FLpcl ( f ( ) ). (d) For every IY, f ( int ( ) ) FLpint ( f ( ) ). Definition.2 Let (X, T) and (Y, S) be any two fuzzy topological spaces. Any f : (X, T) (Y, S) is said to be a fuzzy locally continuous function ( briefly, FLcf ) if for each fuzzy closed set IY, f ( ) IX is fuzzy locally closed. Definition. Let ( X, T ) and ( Y, S ) be any two fuzzy topological spaces. Any function f : (X, T) (Y, S) is said to be a fuzzy locally regular continuous function (briefly, FLrcf ) if for each fuzzy closed set IY, f ( ) IX is fuzzy locally regular closed. Proposition.2 Every fuzzy locally regular continuous function is fuzzy locally Remark. The converse of the above Proposition.2 need not be true. Example. Every fuzzy locally continuous function need not be fuzzy locally regular Let X = { a, b } and let,, 2 IX be defined as follows: ( a ) = 0., ( b ) = 0.2; ( a ) = 0.5, ( b ) = 2 2 0.8; ( a ) = 0.4, ( b ) = 0.7. Define the fuzzy topology on X as T = { 0,,, 2, }. Define the fuzzy topology on Y as S = {0,, }, where IY is defined as (a) = 0.7, (b) = 0.6. Clearly, (X, T) and (Y, S) are fuzzy topological spaces. Define f : ( X, T ) ( Y, S ) as f ( a ) = b, f ( b ) = a. Now, f ( ) = ( 0.4, 0. ) is fuzzy locally closed in ( X, T ) but not fuzzy locally regular closed. Hence every fuzzy locally continuous function need not be fuzzy locally regular Definition.4 Let (X, T) and (Y, S) be any two fuzzy topological spaces. A function f : ( X, T ) ( Y, S ) is said to be a fuzzy locally G δ continuous function ( briefly, FLG δ cf ) if for each fuzzy closed set IY, f ( ) IX is fuzzy locally G δ closed. Proposition. Every fuzzy locally regular continuous function is fuzzy locally G δ Remark.2 The converse of the above Proposition. need not be true. Example.2 Every fuzzy locally G δ continuous function need not be fuzzy locally regular Let X = [ 0, ] and let (n) I X be define as (n) = 2n, where n =, 2. Let Y = { a }. Define the fuzzy 8n+2 topology on X as T = { 0,, (n)}. Define the fuzzy topology on Y as S = { 0,, },where I Y be defined as (a) =. Clearly (X, T) and (Y, S) are fuzzy topological spaces. Let f : (X, T) (Y, S) be an 4 identity function. Then, f ( ) = ( ) IX is fuzzy locally G δ closed. Thus f is fuzzy locally G δ But, f ( ) is not a fuzzy locally regular closed set. Hence f is not fuzzy locally regular Proposition.4 Every fuzzy locally continuous function is fuzzy locally G δ Remark. The converse of the above Proposition.4 need not be true. Example. Every fuzzy locally G δ continuous function need not be fuzzy locally Let X = [0, ] and let (n) IX be define as (n) = n, where n =, 2. Let Y = {a}. Define the fuzzy 7n topology on X as T = {0,, ( n)}. Define the fuzzy topology on Y as S={0,, },where IY is defined as (a) = 6. Clearly, (X, T) and (Y, S) are fuzzy topological spaces. Let f : (X, T) (Y, S) be an identity function. 7 26

Dr. B.AMUDHAMBIGAI & KARTHIKA Then, f ( ) = ( ) IX is fuzzy locally G δ closed. Thus f is fuzzy locally G But δ f ( ) is not a fuzzy locally closed set. Hence f is not fuzzy locally Definition.5 Let (X, T) and (Y, S) be any two fuzzy topological spaces. A function f : ( X, T ) ( Y, S ) is said to be a fuzzy locally pre-continuous function (briefly,flp-cf ) if for each fuzzy closed set I Y, f ( ) IX is fuzzy locally pre-closed. Proposition.5 Every fuzzy locally continuous function is fuzzy locally pre- Remark.4 The converse of the above Proposition.5 need not be true. Example.4 Every fuzzy locally pre-continuous function need not be fuzzy locally Let X ={a, b} and let,, 2 IX be defined as follows: (a) = 0.2, (b) = 0.; (a) = 0., (b) = 0.4; ( a 2 2 ) = 0.85, ( b) = 0.75. Define the fuzzy topology on X as T = {0,,, 2, }. Define the fuzzy topology on Y as S = {0,, }, where IY is defined as (a) = 0.25, (b) = 0.2. Clearly, (X, T) and (Y, S) are fuzzy topological spaces. Define f : ( X, T ) ( Y, S ) as f (a) = b; f (b) = a. Now, f ( ) = ( 0.8, 0.75 ) is fuzzy pre-closed in ( X, T ). Thus, f ( ) = ( 0.8, 0.75 ) is fuzzy locally pre-closed but not fuzzy locally closed. Definition.6 Let (X, T) and (Y, S) be any two fuzzy topological spaces. Any f : ( X, T ) ( Y, S ) is said to be a fuzzy locally - continuous function ( briefly, FL -cf ) if for each fuzzy closed set IY, f ( ) I X is fuzzy locally - closed. Proposition.6 Every fuzzy locally continuous function is fuzzy locally - Remark.5 The converse of the above Proposition.6 need not be true. Example.5 Every fuzzy locally - continuous function need not be fuzzy locally Let X = {a, b} and let,, 2 IX be defined as follows: (a) = 0.8, 0.; (a) = 0., (b) = 0.. Define the fuzzy topology on X as T ={0,,, (b) = 0.85; (a) = 0.5, (b) = 2 2 2, }. Define the fuzzy topology on Y as S = {0,, }, where IY is defined as (a) = 0.2, (b) = 0.. Clearly, (X, T) and (Y, S) are fuzzy topological spaces. Define f : ( X, T ) ( Y, S ) as f (a) = b; f b) = a. Now, f ( ) = ( 0.7, 0.8 ) is fuzzy -closed. Thus f ( ) =( 0.7, 0.8 ) is fuzzy locally - closed but not fuzzy locally closed. Proposition.7 Every fuzzy locally -continuous function is fuzzy locally pre- Remark.6 The converse of the above Proposition.7 need not be true. Example.6 Every fuzzy locally pre-continuous function need not be fuzzy locally - Let X = {a, b} and let,, 2 IX be defined as follows: (a) = 0.2, (b) = 0.; (a) = 0., (b) 2 2 = 0.4; (a) = 0.85, (b) = 0.75. Define the fuzzy topology as T = { 0,,, 2, }. Define the fuzzy topology as S = { 0,, }, where IY is defined as (a) = 0., (b) = 0.2. Clearly, (X, T) and (Y, S) are fuzzy topological spaces. Define f : (X, T) (Y, S) as f (a) = b; f (b) = a. Now, f ( ) = ( 0.8, 0.9 ) is fuzzy pre-closed in (X, T ). Thus f ( ) = (0.8, 0.75) is fuzzy locally pre-closed but not fuzzy locally - closed. Remark.7 The notions of fuzzy locally Gδ continuous functions and fuzzy locally -continuous functions are independent. Example.7 Let X = [ 0, ] and let ( n ) I X be define as ( n ) = n, where n =, 2. Define the 8n+ fuzzy topology on X as T = { 0,, ( n ) }. Define the fuzzy topology on Y as S = {0,, }, where I Y be defined as ( a ) = 5. Clearly, (X, T) and ( Y, S ) are fuzzy topological spaces. Let f : ( X, T ) ( Y, S ) be an 6 identity function. Then, f ( ) = ( ) I X is fuzzy locally G δ closed, where f ( ) = n= (n) is fuzzy G δ. Thus f is fuzzy locally Gδ But, f ( ) is not fuzzy locally - closed. Hence f is not fuzzy locally - 27

A STUDY ON FUZZY LOCALLY G δ Example.8 Let X = { a, b } and let, 2, IX be defined as ( a ) = 0., ( b ) = 0.; 2 ( a ) = 0.5, 2 ( b ) = 0.; ( a ) = 0.8, ( b ) = 0.85. Define the fuzzy topology on X as T = {0,,, 2, }. Define the fuzzy topology on Y as S = {0,, }, where IY is defined as (a) = 0.2, (b) = 0.. Clearly, ( X, T ) and (Y, S) are fuzzy topological spaces. Define f : (X, T) (Y, S) as f (a) = b; f (b) = a. Now, f ( ) = (0.7, 0.8) is fuzzy -closed. Thus f ( ) = (0.7, 0.8) is fuzzy locally - closed but not fuzzy locally G δ closed. Hence every fuzzy locally - continuous function need not be fuzzy locally G δ Thus, fuzzy locally G δ continuous functions and fuzzy locally - continuous functions are of independent notions. Remark.8 Clearly the above discussions give the following implications: Acknowledgement: The authors express their sincere thanks to the referees for their valuable comments regarding the improvement of the paper. REFERENCES [] Amudhambigai B, Uma M. K. and Roja E, r-fuzzy-g δ - g ~ -Locally Closed Sets and Fuzzy G δ - g ~ -Locally Continuous Functions, Int. J. of Mathematical Sciences and Applications, Vol., No., September 20. [2] Azad K. K., On Fuzzy Semi-continuity, Fuzzy Almost continuity and Fuzzy Weakly Continuity, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 82 (98), 4-2. [] Balasubramanian G, Maximal fuzzy topologies, Kybernetika, (995), 459-464. [4] Bin Shahna A. S.. On fuzzy strongly semi-continuity and fuzzy pre-continuity, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 44 (99), pp. 0-408. [5] Bourbaki N., General Topology, Part - I. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass. 966. [6] Chang C. L, Fuzzy Topological Spaces, J. Math. Anal. Appl, 24 (968), 82-90. [7] Erdal Ekici,On Fuzzy Functions, Common. Korean Math. Soc.20 (2005), No. 4.78-789. [8] Fatteh U. V. and Bassan D. S., Fuzzy connectedness and its stronger forms, J. Math. Anal. Appl., (985), 449-464. [9] Ganster M. and Reilly I. L., Locally Closed Sets and Lc-Continuous functions, Internet. J. Math. Sci., Vol-2 No. (989), 47-424. [0] Roja E, Uma M. K. and Balasubramanian G, G δ -connectedness and G δ -disconnectedness in fuzzy topological spaces, East Asian Math.J.2(2007), No2, 59-74. [] Smets P., The Degree of Belief in a Fuzzy Event Inform, sci., 25(98), - 9. [2] Sugeno M., An Introductory Survey of Fuzzy Control, Inform, Sci., 6 (985), 59-8. [] Uma M. K., Roja E. and Balasubramanian G, Semi-Connectedness in fuzzy topological spaces, Kochi J. Math. 4 (2009), 9-9. [4] Zadeh L. A., fuzzy sets, information and control, 8 (965), 8-5. 28