NIST Database for the Simulation of Electron Spectra For Surface Analysis (SESSA)*

Similar documents
Growth and Trends in Auger Electron Spectroscopy and X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy

Introduction to X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) XPS which makes use of the photoelectric effect, was developed in the mid-1960

Auger Electron Spectroscopy

Electron Spettroscopies

Lecture 5. X-ray Photoemission Spectroscopy (XPS)

Effects of Electron Backscattering in Auger Electron Spectroscopy: Recent Developments

Photoelectron Peak Intensities in Solids

Comprehensive model of electron energy deposition*

The Benefit of Wide Energy Range Spectrum Acquisition During Sputter Depth Profile Measurements

X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) Prof. Paul K. Chu

Ted Madey s Scientific Career at NBS/NIST: Aspects of Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES), X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS), and Vacuum Science

Depth Distribution Functions of Secondary Electron Production and Emission

Direct Observation of an Inhomogeneous Chlorine Distribution in CH 3 NH 3 PbI 3-x Cl x Layers: Surface Depletion and Interface Enrichment

Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES) Prof. Paul K. Chu

Appearance Potential Spectroscopy

IV. Surface analysis for chemical state, chemical composition

MS482 Materials Characterization ( 재료분석 ) Lecture Note 5: RBS

Inelastic background analysis of HAXPES spectra: towards enhanced bulk sensitivity in photoemission Tougaard, Sven Mosbæk

5) Surface photoelectron spectroscopy. For MChem, Spring, Dr. Qiao Chen (room 3R506) University of Sussex.

Fundamentals of Nanoscale Film Analysis

Electron spectroscopy Lecture Kai M. Siegbahn ( ) Nobel Price 1981 High resolution Electron Spectroscopy

Lecture 7 Chemical/Electronic Structure of Glass

X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES)

EDS User School. Principles of Electron Beam Microanalysis

X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)-2

An introduction to X- ray photoelectron spectroscopy

LAB REPORT ON XRF OF POTTERY SAMPLES By BIJOY KRISHNA HALDER Mohammad Arif Ishtiaque Shuvo Jie Hong

Methods of surface analysis

X-Rays, Electrons and Lithography: Fundamental Processes in Molecular Radiation Chemistry

Measurement of the role of secondary electrons in EUV resist exposures

Fourteenth Topical Conference on Quantitative Surface Analysis (QSA 14)

Monte Carlo study of medium-energy electron penetration in aluminium and silver

Auger Electron Spectroscopy *

Characterization of Secondary Emission Materials for Micro-Channel Plates. S. Jokela, I. Veryovkin, A. Zinovev

SEM. Chemical Analysis in the. Elastic and Inelastic scattering. Chemical analysis in the SEM. Chemical analysis in the SEM

Document Version Publisher s PDF, also known as Version of Record (includes final page, issue and volume numbers)

Name: (a) What core levels are responsible for the three photoelectron peaks in Fig. 1?

MS482 Materials Characterization ( 재료분석 ) Lecture Note 4: XRF

Photon Interaction. Spectroscopy

Electron Spectroscopy

Local Anodic Oxidation with AFM: A Nanometer-Scale Spectroscopic Study with Photoemission Microscopy

Auger Electron Spectrometry. EMSE-515 F. Ernst

An Introduction to Auger Electron Spectroscopy

AES Features in CasaXPS

Comparison of different methods for evaluating the transmission function of a two-stage cylindrical mirror analizer in XPS applications

Photoelectron spectroscopy Instrumentation. Nanomaterials characterization 2

5.8 Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES)

Process-Simulation-Flow And Metrology of VLSI Layout Fine- Features

Lecture 22 Ion Beam Techniques

Influence of Surface Roughness on Results of XPS Measurements

Electron momentum spectroscopy of metals

Lecture 23 X-Ray & UV Techniques

User's Guide QUASES-ARXPS. Quantitative Analysis of Surfaces by Electron Spectroscopy. Version 1.1

Birck Nanotechnology Center XPS: X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy ESCA: Electron Spectrometer for Chemical Analysis

Ultra-High Vacuum Synthesis of Strain-Controlled Model. Pt(111)-Shell Layers: Surface Strain and Oxygen Reduction

X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)-2

Estimation of IMFP except for a constant factor using only XPS background-optimized peak intensities and cross sections

Photoemission Spectroscopy

XPS & Scanning Auger Principles & Examples

Stability of Organic Cations in Solution-Processed CH3NH3PbI3 Perovskites: Formation of Modified Surface Layers

PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY (PES)

X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)

XPS studies of octadecylphosphonic acid (OPA) monolayer interactions with some metal and mineral surfaces

MS482 Materials Characterization ( 재료분석 ) Lecture Note 5: RBS. Byungha Shin Dept. of MSE, KAIST

Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES)

The active background method in XPS data peak-fitting

Interpretation of Electron Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry for Hydrogen Quantification. Rafael Alvarez, Francisco Yubero*

Electronic Supplementary Information

Surface Sensitivity & Surface Specificity

Supplementary Information

Thermal Effect Behavior of Materials under Scanning Electron Microscopy. Monte Carlo and Molecular Dynamics Hybrid Model.

Probing Matter: Diffraction, Spectroscopy and Photoemission

DETERMINATION OF INELASTIC MEAN FREE PATH OF ELECTRONS IN NOBLE METALS

Inelastic soft x-ray scattering, fluorescence and elastic radiation

Soft X-ray multilayer mirrors by ion assisted sputter deposition

X-ray Energy Spectroscopy (XES).

MSE 321 Structural Characterization

MT Electron microscopy Scanning electron microscopy and electron probe microanalysis

Keywords: Abstract. Uwe Scheithauer. Unterhaching

Keywords: electron spectroscopy, coincidence spectroscopy, Auger photoelectron, background elimination, Low Energy Tail (LET)

High Accuracy EUV Reflectometry and Scattering at the Advanced Light Source

Film Characterization Tutorial G.J. Mankey, 01/23/04. Center for Materials for Information Technology an NSF Materials Science and Engineering Center

Ion sputtering yield coefficients from In thin films bombarded by different energy Ar + ions

ECE Semiconductor Device and Material Characterization

The design of an integrated XPS/Raman spectroscopy instrument for co-incident analysis

Surface Analysis - The Principal Techniques

Energy Spectroscopy. Ex.: Fe/MgO

Advanced Lab Course. X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 BASICS 1 3 EXPERIMENT Qualitative analysis Chemical Shifts 7

Influence of Recoil Effect and Surface Excitations on the Inelastic Mean Free Paths of Electrons in Polymers

Electron Rutherford Backscattering, a versatile tool for the study of thin films

A Plasmonic Photocatalyst Consisting of Silver Nanoparticles Embedded in Titanium Dioxide. Ryan Huschka LANP Seminar February 19, 2008

cond-mat/ Jul 1998

Nanosphere Lithography

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

INORGANIC ELEMENT FUNCTIONAL GROUP DATABASE ON PULVERIZED COAL SURFACE BASED ON XPS METHOD

MT Electron microscopy Scanning electron microscopy and electron probe microanalysis

Sensitive and Recyclable Substrates of Surface-enhanced Raman Scattering

raw materials C V Mn Mg S Al Ca Ti Cr Si G H Nb Na Zn Ni K Co A B C D E F

INTERNATIONAL BULLETIN ON ATOMIC AND MOLECULAR DATA FOR FUSION

Transcription:

NIST Database for the Simulation of Electron Spectra For Surface Analysis (SESSA)* 1. What is it? 2. What can it do? 3. Summary Cedric Powell National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg *https://www.nist.gov/srd/nist-standard-reference-database-100. 1

1. What is SESSA*? SESSA can be used to simulate AES and XPS spectra of multilayer films and of nanostructures such as islands, lines, spheres, and layered spheres on surfaces. Users can specify the compositions and dimensions of each material in the sample structure and the measurement configuration. SESSA contains needed physical data: differential inverse inelastic mean free paths, total inelastic mean free paths, differential elastic-scattering cross sections, total elastic-scattering cross sections, transport cross sections, photoionization cross sections, photoionization asymmetry parameters, electron-impact ionization cross sections, photoelectron lineshapes, Augerelectron lineshapes, fluorescence yields, and Auger-electron backscattering factors. SESSA can be operated through a graphical user interface (GUI) or through a command line interface (CLI). The GUI enables a user to enter needed information in an intuitive way (sample morphology, composition, dimensions, instrument configuration, excitation source, spectrometer energy range) while the CLI facilitates simulations for similar conditions (i.e., batch runs). *https://www.nist.gov/srd/nist-standard-reference-database-100 2

GUI for a Planar Sample (C/SiO 2 /Si) 3

GUI for a Planar Sample (C/SiO 2 /Si) 4

GUI for Periodic Array of Cu Islands or Lines on a Si Substrate 5

GUI for Periodic Array of Au-core/C-shell Nanoparticles on a Si Substrate 6

GUI for a Planar Sample (C/SiO 2 /Si): Peak Tab 7

GUI to Specify Excitation Source GUI for Spectrometer: Specify Energy Range 8

GUI for Instrument Settings 9

GUI for Simulation [Example: Planar Sample (C/SiO 2 /Si)] O 1s C 1s Si 2s Si 2p 10

2. Examples of SESSA Applications (a) Absolute Quantification of Surface Impurities on Layered Samples Schematic of Multilayer Mirrors Used for Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography (e.g., N, S, P, F, Cl, Br) XPS has been used to assess detect and quantify trace levels of surface impurities on mirrors arising from outgassing of resists We developed a procedure to quantify amounts of surface impurities rather than assuming sample to be homogeneous and using instrumental software N. S. Faradzhev, S. B. Hill, and C. J. Powell, Surf. Interface Anal. (in press); DOI: 10.1002/sia.6289 11

Intensity (counts x 10-5 ) Comparison of Measured XPS Spectrum for a Multilayer Mirror Sample (solid blue circles) and a Simulated Spectrum (solid red triangles) for 0.25 nm SiO 2 /0.25 nm CCl 0.01 /0.25 nm C/0.25 nm RuO 2 /3 nm Ru/4.3 nm Si/ 3 nm Mo/Si 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 B Simulated Spectrum Measured Spectrum Ru 3s O 1s Ru 3p C 1s Ru 3d 0 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 N. S. Faradzhev, S. B. Hill, and C. J. Powell, Surf. Interface Anal. (in press); 12 DOI: 10.1002/sia.6289

Intensity (counts x 10-5 ) Comparison of Measured XPS Spectrum for a Multilayer Mirror Sample (solid blue circles) and a Simulated Spectrum (solid red triangles) for 0.25 nm SiO 2 /0.25 nm CCl 0.01 /0.25 nm C/0.25 nm RuO 2 /3 nm Ru/4.3 nm Si/ 3 nm Mo/Si 0.8 Comparison of measured and simulated Cl 2p intensities gives a surface Cl coverage of 0.20 ML (± 21 %) 0.6 0.4 0.2 B Simulated Spectrum Measured Spectrum Mo 3d Cl 2p Si 2s Si 2p Ru 4s Ru 4p N. S. Faradzhev, S. B. Hill, and C. J. Powell, Surf. Interface Anal. (in press); 13 DOI: 10.1002/sia.6289 0.0 250 200 150 100 50 Binding Energy (ev) 0

(b) Comparison of Simulated Cu 2p Spectra from Cu/Au Nanoparticles Relative Intensity We used SESSA to determine the Au-shell thicknesses that gave a selected Cu 2p peak intensity for different Cu-core diameters 2.5 2.0 1.5 Elastic scattering on Spectrum 0.775 nm Au/10 58 nm Cu Spectrum 0.70 nm Au/5 56 nm Cu Spectrum 0.475 nm 54 Au/2 nm Cu Spectrum 0.255 nm 52A Au/1 nm Cu Spectrum 0.085 nm 60 Au/0.5 nm Cu Au Cu 1.0 0.5 0.0 450 500 550 Electron Energy (ev) C. J. Powell, M. Chudzicki, W. S. M. Werner, and W. Smekal, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 14 33, 05E113 (2015).

Relative Intensity We used SESSA to determine the Cu-shell thicknesses that gave a selected Cu 2p peak intensity for different Au-core diameters 2.5 2.0 1.5 Elastic scattering on Spectrum 0.073 nm Cu/10 58 nm Au Spectrum 0.068 nm 56 Cu/5 nm Au Spectrum 0.060 nm 54 Cu/2 nm Au Spectrum 0.050 nm 52A Cu/1 nm Au Spectrum 0.050 nm 60 Cu/0.5 nm Au Cu Au 1.0 0.5 0.0 450 500 550 Electron Energy (ev) C. J. Powell, M. Chudzicki, W. S. M. Werner, and W. Smekal, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 15 33, 05E113 (2015).

Relative Intensity We used SESSA to determine the Au-shell thicknesses that gave a selected Cu 2p peak intensity from Au-core/1 nm Cu-shell/Au-shell nanoparticles for different Au-core diameters 2.5 2.0 1.5 Elastic scattering on Spectrum 58 Spectrum 56 Spectrum 54 Spectrum 52A Spectrum 60 0.51 nm Au/1 nm Cu/10 nm Au 0.49 nm Au/1 nm Cu/5 nm Au 0.45 nm Au/1 nm Cu/2 nm Au 0.40 nm Au/1 nm Cu/1 nm Au 0.34 nm Au/1 nm Cu/0.5 nm Au Au Au 1.0 Cu 0.5 0.0 450 500 550 Electron Energy (ev) C. J. Powell, M. Chudzicki, W. S. M. Werner, and W. Smekal, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 16 33, 05E113 (2015).

Relative Intensity We used SESSA to determine the Au content of CuAu x nanoparticles that gave A selected Cu 2p intensity for different nanoparticle diameters 2.5 2.0 1.5 Elastic scattering on Spectrum 58 Spectrum 56 Spectrum 54 Spectrum 52A Spectrum 60 d = 10 nm, x = 2.70 d = 5 nm, x = 2.60 d = 2 nm, x = 2.10 d = 1 nm, x = 1.32 d = 0.5 nm, x = 0.55 CuAu x 1.0 0.5 0.0 450 500 550 Electron Energy (ev) C. J. Powell, M. Chudzicki, W. S. M. Werner, and W. Smekal, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 17 33, 05E113 (2015).

(c) Validation of the Shard Formula for Determining Shell Thicknesses of Core-Shell Nanoparticles. We determined shell thicknesses, T NP, from the Shard formula using peak intensities from SESSA simulations for (a) Au-core/C-shell, (b) C-core/Au-shell, (c) Al-core/Cu-shell, and (d) Cu-core/Al-shell NPs and compared these values with the corresponding true values, T, used in the simulations for different Au-core diameters, D. 1.2 Au-core/C-shell NPs 1.1 T NP /T 1.0 0.9 D (nm) 1 nm 2 nm 5 nm 10 nm 0.8 0 1 2 3 C-shell Thickness T (nm) C. J. Powell, W. S. M. Werner, H. Kalbe, A. G. Shard, and D. G. Castner (to be published). 18

T NP /T We determined shell thicknesses, T NP, from the Shard formula using peak intensities from SESSA simulations for (a) Au-core/C-shell, (b) C-core/Au-shell, (c) Al-core/Cu-shell, and (d) Cu-core/Al-shell NPs and compared these values with the corresponding true values, T, used in the simulations for different Au-core diameters, D. 1.2 1.1 C-core/Au-shell NPs D (nm) 1 nm 2 nm 5 nm 10 nm 1.0 0.9 0.8 0 1 2 3 Au-shell Thickness T (nm) C. J. Powell, W. S. M. Werner, H. Kalbe, A. G. Shard, and D. G. Castner (to be published). 19

T NP /T We determined shell thicknesses, T NP, from the Shard formula using peak intensities from SESSA simulations for (a) Au-core/C-shell, (b) C-core/Au-shell, (c) Al-core/Cu-shell, and (d) Cu-core/Al-shell NPs and compared these values with the corresponding true values, T, used in the simulations for different Au-core diameters, D. 1.2 1.1 Al-core/Cu-shell NPs D (nm) 1 nm 2 nm 5 nm 10 nm 1.0 0.9 0.8 0 1 2 3 Cu-shell Thickness T (nm) C. J. Powell, W. S. M. Werner, H. Kalbe, A. G. Shard, and D. G. Castner (to be published). 20

T NP /T We determined shell thicknesses, T NP, from the Shard formula using peak intensities from SESSA simulations for (a) Au-core/C-shell, (b) C-core/Au-shell, (c) Al-core/Cu-shell, and (d) Cu-core/Al-shell NPs and compared these values with the corresponding true values, T, used in the simulations for different Au-core diameters, D. 1.2 1.1 Cu-core/Al-shell NPs D (nm) 1 nm 2 nm 5 nm 10 nm 1.0 0.9 0.8 0 1 2 3 Al-shell Thickness T (nm) C. J. Powell, W. S. M. Werner, H. Kalbe, A. G. Shard, and D. G. Castner (to be published). 21

3. Summary SESSA* is a NIST database that contains extensive data for quantitative AES and XPS SESSA can be used to simulate AES and XPS spectra for multilayer thin films and of nanostructures such as islands, lines, spheres, and layered spheres on surfaces. Users can specify the compositions and dimensions of each material in the sample and the measurement configuration. 22 *https://www.nist.gov/srd/nist-standard-reference-database-100