Classic Oligopoly Models: Bertrand and Cournot

Similar documents
Bertrand Model of Price Competition. Advanced Microeconomic Theory 1

Market Power. Economics II: Microeconomics. December Aslanyan (VŠE) Oligopoly 12/09 1 / 39

Advanced Microeconomics

Oligopoly Theory. This might be revision in parts, but (if so) it is good stu to be reminded of...

Oligopoly Notes. Simona Montagnana

EconS Oligopoly - Part 2

Basics of Game Theory

4. Partial Equilibrium under Imperfect Competition

Answer Key: Problem Set 3

Oligopoly Theory 2 Bertrand Market Games

Oligopoly. Molly W. Dahl Georgetown University Econ 101 Spring 2009

Static Models of Oligopoly

Oligopoly. Oligopoly. Xiang Sun. Wuhan University. March 23 April 6, /149

Industrial Organization

Industrial Organization, Fall 2011: Midterm Exam Solutions and Comments Date: Wednesday October

Oligopoly. Firm s Profit Maximization Firm i s profit maximization problem: Static oligopoly model with n firms producing homogenous product.

On revealed preferences in oligopoly games

Research and Development

1 Oligopoly: Bertrand Model

Lecture 1: Introduction to IO Tom Holden

T R(y(L)) w L = 0. L so we can write this as p ] (b) Recall that with the perfectly competitive firm, demand for labor was such that

Lecture #11: Introduction to the New Empirical Industrial Organization (NEIO) -

Trade policy III: Export subsidies

EconS Sequential Competition

3.3.3 Illustration: Infinitely repeated Cournot duopoly.

Wireless Network Pricing Chapter 6: Oligopoly Pricing

EXAMINATION #4 ANSWER KEY. I. Multiple choice (1)a. (2)e. (3)b. (4)b. (5)d. (6)c. (7)b. (8)b. (9)c. (10)b. (11)b.

ECO 2901 EMPIRICAL INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION

8. MARKET POWER: STATIC MODELS

Welfare consequence of asymmetric regulation in a mixed Bertrand duopoly

Industrial Organization Lecture 7: Product Differentiation

Y j R L divide goods into produced goods (outputs) > 0 output, call its price p < 0 input, call its price ω

GS/ECON 5010 Answers to Assignment 3 W2005

3. Partial Equilibrium under Imperfect Competition Competitive Equilibrium

Game Theory and Algorithms Lecture 2: Nash Equilibria and Examples

UC Berkeley Haas School of Business Game Theory (EMBA 296 & EWMBA 211) Summer 2016

Sequential Merger Review

EconS Advanced Microeconomics II Handout on Repeated Games

EC3224 Autumn Lecture #03 Applications of Nash Equilibrium

Introduction to Game Theory Lecture Note 2: Strategic-Form Games and Nash Equilibrium (2)

Backwards Induction. Extensive-Form Representation. Backwards Induction (cont ) The player 2 s optimization problem in the second stage

Modeling of Chaotic Behavior in the Economic Model

4. CONTINUOUS VARIABLES AND ECONOMIC APPLICATIONS

Volume 29, Issue 3. Strategic delegation and market competitiveness

Katz and Shapiro (1985)

Managerial delegation in multimarket oligopoly

Advanced Microeconomic Analysis, Lecture 6

Durable goods monopolist

Cournot and Bertrand Competition in a Differentiated Duopoly with Endogenous Technology Adoption *

Firms and returns to scale -1- John Riley

Bertrand-Edgeworth Equilibrium in Oligopoly

Solutions to problem set 11 (due Tuesday, April 29 1st, before class)

MS&E 246: Lecture 12 Static games of incomplete information. Ramesh Johari

EconS Nash Equilibrium in Games with Continuous Action Spaces.

Part I: Exercise of Monopoly Power. Chapter 1: Monopoly. Two assumptions: A1. Quality of goods is known by consumers; A2. No price discrimination.

Economics Discussion Paper Series EDP A new look at the classical Bertrand duopoly

Competition Policy - Spring 2005 Monopolization practices I

Lecture Notes: Industrial Organization Joe Chen 1. The Structure Conduct Performance (SCP) paradigm:

Dynamic Bertrand and Cournot Competition

Vertical Product Differentiation and Credence Goods: Mandatory Labeling and Gains from International Integration

Overview. Producer Theory. Consumer Theory. Exchange

A Note on Cost Reducing Alliances in Vertically Differentiated Oligopoly. Abstract

ANSWER KEY 2 GAME THEORY, ECON 395

Bayesian Games and Mechanism Design Definition of Bayes Equilibrium

Growing competition in electricity industry and the power source structure

Static (or Simultaneous- Move) Games of Complete Information

Hotelling's Location Model with Quality Choice in Mixed Duopoly. Abstract

Low-Quality Leadership in a Vertically Differentiated Duopoly with Cournot Competition

EconS 501 Final Exam - December 10th, 2018

Environmental R&D with Permits Trading

Collaborative Network Formation in Spatial Oligopolies

Profitability of price and quantity strategies in a duopoly with vertical product differentiation

Microeconomics for Business Practice Session 3 - Solutions

Empirical Industrial Organization (ECO 310) University of Toronto. Department of Economics Fall Instructor: Victor Aguirregabiria

Ralph s Strategic Disclosure 1

Competition Policy - Spring 2005 Collusion II

Mixed duopolies with advance production

In classical competitive equilibrium, the rms in a market maximize prots taking price as given, each rm produces the quantity at which price equals ma

Price vs. Quantity in Oligopoly Games

Inducing Efficiency in Oligopolistic Markets with. Increasing Returns to Scale

Firms and returns to scale -1- Firms and returns to scale

Industrial Organization Lecture 3: Game Theory

DISCRETE-TIME DYNAMICS OF AN

Asymptotic relations in Cournot s game

Chapter 7 Duopoly. O. Afonso, P. B. Vasconcelos. Computational Economics: a concise introduction

SELECTION OF MARKOV EQUILIBRIUM IN A DYNAMIC OLIGOPOLY WITH PRODUCTION TO ORDER. Milan Horniaček 1

CARLETON ECONOMIC PAPERS

October 16, 2018 Notes on Cournot. 1. Teaching Cournot Equilibrium

Microeconomics Qualifying Exam

A Model of Endogenous Cross-Holdings in Oligopoly

Game Theory Correlated equilibrium 1

s<1/4 p i = 2 3 s s [1/4, 9/16[ p i = p j + 2 s p j 1 if p j < p j p i = 2 3 s if p j p j p i = p j if p j < p j s 9/16

C31: Game Theory, Lecture 1

Heterogenous Competition in a Differentiated Duopoly with Behavioral Uncertainty

Horizontal mergers: Merger in the salmon market Unilateral effects in Cournot markets with differentiated products

Some forgotten equilibria of the Bertrand duopoly!?

y = F (x) = x n + c dy/dx = F`(x) = f(x) = n x n-1 Given the derivative f(x), what is F(x)? (Integral, Anti-derivative or the Primitive function).

Revealed Preference Tests of the Cournot Model

Econ 101A Problem Set 6 Solutions Due on Monday Dec. 9. No late Problem Sets accepted, sorry!

Econ 8601: Industrial Organization (Thomas J. Holmes) Lecture 1. Part 1: The Cost of Monopoly in General Equilibrium. μ 1

Transcription:

Classic Oligopoly Models: Bertrand and Cournot Class Note: There are supplemental readings, including Werden (008) Unilateral Competitive Effects of Horizontal Mergers I: Basic Concepts and Models, that complement this lecture 1 $ Potential efficiency gain from the merger to monopoly Williamson Tradeoff P M DWL of CS created because of merger to monopoly P C Q M mr mc mc M Ashenfelter et al (013) In June of 008 the U.S. Department of Justice approved a joint venture between Miller and Coors, the second and third largest firms in the industry. Despite substantially increasing concentration in an already concentrated industry, the merger was approved by the antitrust authority partially because it was expected to reduce shipping and distribution costs. p. http://www.economist.com/news/business/1665074-ab-inbev-maycombine-sabmiller-flat-market-big-beer-brands-beer-monster Q C D Q Oligopoly (a few firms) & Game Theory Unlike monopoly, profit interdependency for oligopoly: a firm s profits depend on its own behavior and its rivals ; Use game theory Eg: Cellular telephone service in Toronto: Players: Rogers (Fido), Bell, Telus, Wind, Mobilicity Compete on price, services, and advertising To measure market power, add i or j subscript: Lerner Index j = p j mc j p j 3 Class, Page 1 of 11

Basic Elements & Assumptions Noncooperative Game Theory: Each player acts in its own self-interest and cannot credibly commit to do otherwise Allows collusion (cartels) Players rational: seek best payoffs ECO316H, ECO36H A strategic game: Players Rules: Timing of moves, available actions, info Assume each firm knows its profits & rivals profits for all outcomes Outcomes: Results of all possible actions combos Payoffs: Preferences over outcomes 4 Number of Time Periods Static game: One period and all players move simultaneously (long run) Extensive game (multi-period): Multiple period game where players move sequentially and maybe more than once Dynamic game (repeated game): Infinite period game where players repeatedly interact over time 5 Two Symmetric by Normal Form Games: Discrete Actions Cournot Firm : q = 9 Firm : q = 1 Firm 1: q 1 = 9 ($405, $405) ($337.50, $450) Firm 1: q 1 = 1 ($450, $337.50) ($360, $360) Each cell shows: (π 1, π ) Bertrand Firm : p = $0 Firm : p = $5 Firm 1: p 1 = $0 ($500, $500) ($65, $375) Firm 1: p 1 = $5 ($375, $65) ($56.50, $56.50) 6 Class, Page of 11

Best Response and NE Best response: A strategy s i is a best response for firm i to its rivals strategies s i if for all s i : π i s i, s i π i (s i, s i ) Given the rivals strategies, a firm could do no better than playing its best response Nash equilibrium (NE): A strategy profile s (s 1, s,, s n ) is a NE if for all s i and for all players i: π i (s i, s i ) π i s i, s i Given the rivals strategies, no one firm has an incentive to change its strategy 7 Finding NE (if exist, may be multiple) For discrete actions, find NE by checking every possible combination of strategies and asking if any firm would want to change its strategy If no change desired for any firm, then have a NE Otherwise, do not have a NE For continuous actions, find NE by looking for intersection of best response functions Each firm playing a best response given the other firms strategies: means none wish to change 8 Example: Find any and all NE Firm 1: p 1 = $9 Firm 1: p 1 = $10 Firm 1: p 1 = $11 Firm : p = $5 Firm : p = $6 Firm : p = $7 ($119, $14) ($16, $18) ($133, $1) ($10, $15) ($18, $0) ($136, $15) ($117, $16) ($16, $) ($135, $18) How about in Slide 6? 9 Class, Page 3 of 11

Initial Oligopoly Assumptions Consumers are price takers Market demand is downward sloping Each firm has a single choice variable Homogeneous products [note: will be relaxed] No capacity constraints Market equilibrium is static NE No entry, exit, product repositioning, etc. 10 In Class Exercise Teams complete a worksheet Market demand is P = 10 0.5Q Each firm sets its price to the nearest 10 cents E.g. $.60 but not $.65 Marginal costs are $1; there are no fixed costs Homogenous products Consumers buy from firm with lowest price: any higher-priced firm sells zero units If any firms are tied for lowest price, sales divided evenly Deadline: 5 minutes Publically reveal results 11 Illustrate the Bertrand Paradox Bertrand duopoly, homogenous goods Price is continuous: any price possible Costs: C 1 q 1 = cq 1 and C q = cq What is NE in Bertrand game: (p 1, p )? Is each firm playing its best response? Profits at NE? Both firms better at (p M, p M )? What is the best response if rival plays p M? If C 1 q 1 = F 1 + cq 1 and C q = F + cq? If C 1 q 1 = c 1 q 1 and C q = c q if c 1 < c? 1 Class, Page 4 of 11

Escape the Paradox But no paradox if goods differentiated, capacity constrained, interactions repeated E.g. Linear differentiated goods Bertrand model q 1 = a 1 b 11 p 1 + b 1 p q = a b p + b 1 p 1 Costs: C 1 q 1 = c 1 q 1 and C q = c q Why allow for asymmetric marginal costs? Before working with the linear model analytically and graphically, consider a general model 13 π j p 1,, p N = p j q j p 1,, p N C j q j π j p j = q j p 1,, p N + p j mc j q j p 1,, p N p j = set 0 p j mc j q j p j = q j p j mc j = 1 p j q j p j p j p j mc j p j = 1 ε j q j What is name of LHS? Do rival firms prices affect Firm j s price? In general, is ε j constant? If not, what could affect it? 14 Find Bertrand NE: (p 1,, p N ) Start with Firm i s profit function: π i p 1,, p N = TR i p 1,, p N TC i (p 1,, p N ) Take partial derivative of π i p 1,, p N wrt choice variable p i and set equal to 0 Solve for p i : Firm i s best response function Repeat for other firms (or use symmetry) Find intersection of all best response functions, which is the NE 15 Class, Page 5 of 11

Firm 1 s Best Response Function, Linear Bertrand Duopoly Model π 1 p 1, p = TR 1 p 1, p TC 1 p 1, p π 1 p 1, p = p 1 q 1 p 1, p c 1 q 1 p 1, p π 1 p 1, p = (p 1 c 1 ) a 1 b 11 p 1 + b 1 p π 1 = a p 1 b 11 p 1 + b 1 p b 11 (p 1 c 1 ) set = 0 1 a 1 11 p 1 + b 1 p + b 11 c 1 = 0 p 1 = a 1 + b 11 c 1 + b 1 p 11 16 p What happens if Firm 1 lowers its marginal costs? p 1 = a 1 + b 11 c 1 + b 1 p 11 p 1 17 Firm s Best Response Function π p 1, p = TR p 1, p TC p 1, p π p 1, p = p q p 1, p c q p 1, p π p 1, p = (p c ) a b p + b 1 p 1 π p = a b p + b 1 p 1 b (p c ) = set 0 a p + b 1 p 1 + b c = 0 p = a + b c + b 1 p 1 18 Class, Page 6 of 11

p What happens if Firm 1 lowers its marginal costs? p 1 = a 1 + b 11 c 1 + b 1 p 11 p = a + b c + b 1 p 1 p Are any alternate price pairs NE? p 1 p 1 19 Classic Cournot Model Firms choose quantity (continuous, non-neg.) Use initial oligopoly assumptions N Including homogeneous goods: Q = j=1 q j π i q 1,, q N = P Q q i C i (q i ) First solve general case, then explore linear Cournot model: Market demand: P = a bq Costs: C 1 q 1 = c 1 q 1 and C q = c q 0 π j q 1,, q N = P(Q)q j C j q j π j = P Q + P(Q) q j Q q j mc set j = 0 P Q mc j = P(Q) Q q j P Q mc j P(Q) P Q mc j P(Q) 1 q j = Q P(Q) Q P(Q) Q = s j ε If symmetric (mc j = c for all j) then obtain: P Q c P(Q) = 1 Nε 1 Class, Page 7 of 11

Find Cournot NE: (q 1,, q N ) Firm i s profit function: π i q 1,, q N = P Q q i C i (q i ) Take partial derivative of π i q 1,, q N choice variable q i and set equal to 0 wrt Solve for q i : Firm i s best response function Repeat for other firms (or use symmetry) Find intersection of all best response functions, which is the NE Linear Cournot Duopoly Model Firm 1 s best response function: π 1 q 1, q = P(Q)q 1 C 1 q 1 π 1 = a bq c 1 q 1 π 1 = a bq 1 bq c 1 q 1 Firm s best response function: π q 1, q = P(Q)q C q π = a bq c q π = a bq 1 bq c q π 1 q 1 = a bq 1 bq c 1 bq 1 π q = a bq 1 bq c bq a q 1 bq c 1 = set 0 q 1 = a c 1 bq a q bq 1 c set = 0 q = a c bq 1 3 q What happens if Firm 1 lowers its marginal costs? q 1 = a c 1 bq Which firm has lower marginal costs in this diagram? q q = a c bq 1 q 1 q 1 4 Class, Page 8 of 11

Solve for NE Algebraically q 1 = a c 1 bq q = a c bq 1 q 1 = a c 1 b a c bq 1 q 1 = a c 1 + c + b q 1 4bq 1 = a c 1 + c + bq 1 q 1 = a c 1 + c 3b q = a c + c 1 3b 5 Symmetric Cournot Duopoly: A Special Case q q 1 = a c bq q 1 = a c 1 bq q a c bq = q = a c bq q = a c 3b q q = a c bq 1 q q 1 6 Linear Demand: Comparing Outcomes P = a bq Symmetric (c 1 = c = c) Cournot market output, Q = q 1 + q, is between that of a perfectly competitive market and a monopoly Market Structure Perfect Competition Cournot Duopoly Monopoly Market Output (Q) a c b a c 3 b 1 a c b 7 Class, Page 9 of 11

q q 1 = a c bq a c q q = a c bq 1 q a c b q 1 8 Welfare, Efficiency of Symmetric Cournot Duopoly P a P Q = a c 3 b q P a + c a c = π 3 1 = π = 9b a c a c PS = CS = 9b 9b 4 a c TS = DWL 9b c 1 = c = c a c a b Q DWL = 18b 9 Three Firms in Cournot Industry π 1 q 1, q, q 3 = P(Q)q 1 C 1 q 1 π 1 = a bq c 1 q 1 π 1 = a bq 1 bq bq 3 c 1 q 1 π 1 q 1 = a bq 1 bq bq 3 c 1 bq 1 a q 1 bq bq 3 c set 1 = 0 q 1 = a c 1 bq bq 3 However, if symmetric: q = a c bq bq q a c = 4b Q = 3 a c 4 b 30 Class, Page 10 of 11

Bertrand versus Cournot Bertrand: Firms choose price Output (capacity) more flexible than price Strategic variable is price Output adjusted to clear the market: meet demand at chosen price E.g. software, streaming movies (Netflix) Cournot: Firms choose quantity Price more flexible than output (capacity) Strategic variable is quantity Price adjusted to clear the market E.g. commodities (milk, wheat, chemicals, steel, etc.) 31 Slope of Best Response Strategic substitutes: Best response functions have negative slope Cournot, linear demand, constant mc Strategic complements: Best response functions have positive slope Bertrand, linear demand (differentiated goods), constant mc Implications for merger analysis 3 Looking Ahead Workshop 1, Tuesday, 11:10 1:00, this room Bring a laptop with Excel Download the merger simulation spreadsheets from our course site ahead of time http://homes.chass.utoronto.ca/~murdockj/eco410/ Interactive parts and there are also slides posted Also, Assignment #1 given on Tuesday 33 Class, Page 11 of 11