mtu and no band at 680 mju. This suggests reduced efficiency of energy transfer TRANSFER OF THE EXCITATION

Similar documents
INHIBITION OF PHOTOSYNTHESIS IN CERTAIN ALGAE BY EXTREME RED LIGHT

(From the Biology Division, Oak Ridge Nationag Laboratory, Oak Ridge) Materials and Methods

LOW-TEMPERATURE (4-77 K) SPECTROSCOPY OF CHLORELLA; TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE OF ENERGY TRANSFER EFFICIENCY

Photosynthetic Adaptation in Synechococcus Cells

(From tke Department of Plant Biology, Carnegie Institution oj Washington, Stanford)

THE EFFECT OF MAGNESIUM IONS ON ACTION SPECTRA FOR RE ACTIONS MEDIATED BY PHOTOSYSTEMS! AND II IN SPINACH CHLO- ROPEASTS

Salt-induced alterations of the fluorescence yield and of emission spectra in Chlorella pyrenoidosa

CLASS 11 th. Photosynthesis

light that supports oxygen evolution, spectral evidence was obtained for

(From the Kerckhoff Laboratories of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena)

Name: Period: Date: Photosynthesis Practice Questions

Chromatic adaptation and photoreversal in blue-green alga Calothrix clavata West

#22 Visible Spectrum of Chlorophyll from Spinach

Excitation transfer between photosynthetic units: the 1964 experiment

Photosynthesis. Introduction

BIOL 221 Concepts of Botany

Biology 3A Laboratory Photosynthesis

Mercury ions inhibit photosynthetic electron transport at multiple sites in the cyanobacterium Synechococcus 6301

Spectroscopy. Page 1 of 8 L.Pillay (2012)

Clinical Chemistry (CHE221) Professor Hicks Week 7. Endpoint vs Kinetic Techniques. Instrumentation and Assay techniques

FACTORS AFFECTING THE RATE OF PHOTOSYNTHESIS

Lecture 3. Photosynthesis 1

Q1. The diagram shows a summary of the light-independent reaction of photosynthesis.

In Vivo Monitoring of Blue-Green Algae Using Hydrolab Multi- Parameter Sondes

Response of Crops to a Heat Wave Detected by using Airborne Reflectance and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Measurements

Evolution of the Z-Scheme of Electron Transport in Oxygenic Photosynthesis

This dissertation has been 65-11,751 microfilmed exactly as received

Photosynthesis and Cellular Respiration

THERMOLUMINESCENCE AND TEMPERATURE EFFECTS ON DELAYED LIGHT EMISSION (CORRECTED FOR CHANGES IN QUANTUM YIELD OF FLUORESCENCE) IN DCMU-TREATED ALGAE*

Absorption photometry

Photosynthesis. 1) Heterotrophs: 2) Autotrophs: 3) Phytoplankton:

Preview from Notesale.co.uk Page 1 of 38

ACTIVITY 1. Exploring Light from Gases

Period-four oscillations of the flash-induced oxygen formation in photosynthesis

Emission Spectrum of Atomic Gases. Prelab Questions

The Spectrophotometer and Atomic Spectra of Hydrogen Physics 246

INTRODUCTION bioactive compounds Pigmentation chromobacteria water soluble water insoluble

QUANTUM ACCUMULATION IN PHOTOSYNTHETIC OXYGEN EVOLUTION

Photosynthesis: Light reactions

Name: Class: _ Date: ID: A. AP Photosynthesis Test 2012

A Guide to Recording Fluorescence Quantum Yields

AP Biology Lab 4 PLANT PIGMENTS AND PHOTOSYNTHESIS

EXCITATION ENERGY TRANSFER BETWEgN

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

(From ~he Hopkins Marine Station, Pacific Grove, and the Physics Department, University of California, Berkeley)

This dissertation has been microfilmed! exactly as received

PHOTOSYNTHESIS Student Packet SUMMARY

Variable Fluorescence 4/13/10. Fluorescence HEAT

Laser induced fluorescence

Chemistry 524--Final Exam--Keiderling May 4, :30 -?? pm SES

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CHLOROPHYLL AND THE CAROTENOIDS IN THE ALGAL FLAGELLATE, EUGLENA* BY J. J. WOLKEN AND A. D. MELLON

State Transitions Affect Fv/Fm & Yield Measurements

FLUORESCENCE APPLICATIONS

HYDROGEN. technique. uptake/co2 uptake, which according to equation (1) should equal 4, has

Complete the notes on photosynthesis in the spaces below.

Spectrophotometry. Introduction

RED. BLUE Light. Light-Matter

The light reactions convert solar energy to the chemical energy of ATP and NADPH

1. What is the primary source of energy for most living things on earth?

Chemistry 524--Final Exam--Keiderling Dec. 12, pm SES

AS 101: Day Lab #2 Summer Spectroscopy

Experiment 12: SPECTROSCOPY: EMISSION & ABSORPTION

EXPERIMENT NO. 4. Thermal Radiation: the Stefan-Boltzmann Law

5.3. Physics and the Quantum Mechanical Model

Ultraviolet-Visible and Infrared Spectrophotometry

THEORETICAL ANALYSIS OF THE ENHANCEMENT EFFECT IN PHOTOSYNTHESIS

X Biology I. Unit 1-4: Cellular Energy

Traceable UV-Vis Reference Materials

MUNDAY, Jr., John Clingman, THE FLUORESCENCE TRANSIENT OF CHLORELLA PYRENOIDOSA. University of Illinois, Ph.D.

Chapter 37 Early Quantum Theory and Models of the Atom. Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.

Model Answer (Paper code: AR-7112) M. Sc. (Physics) IV Semester Paper I: Laser Physics and Spectroscopy

Ultraviolet-Visible and Infrared Spectrophotometry

Coherence and width of spectral lines with Michelson interferometer

Natural Fluorescence Calculations: Terminology and Units

Life Sciences For NET & SLET Exams Of UGC-CSIR. Section B and C. Volume-10. Contents A. PHOTOSYNTHESIS 1 B. RESPIRATION AND PHOTORESPIRATION 33

Lab 11: Must what goes in be the same as what comes out? Spectroscopy & Fluorescence in Chlorophyll.

Heterotrophs: Organisms that depend on an external source of organic compounds

Reduction of Phenolindo-2,6 -dichlorophenol in Dark and Light by the Blue-Green Alga, Anabaena variabilis

1 Look at the image on the photo support sheet, the micrograph shows a chloroplast.

The main form of energy from the sun is in the form of electromagnetic radiation. Visible radiation (white light) used for photosynthesis ROY G.

ATOMIC SPECTRA. Objective:

APAS Laboratory { PAGE } Spectroscopy SPECTROSCOPY

Separation and Identification of Plant Pigments Dr. Gergens - SD Mesa College

Phytoplankton Photosynthesis

Influence of carbon dioxide concentration during growth on fluorescence induction characteristics of the Green Alga Chlamydomonas reinhardii

Ignacio Tinoco, Jr.*, Marcos F. Maestret, Carlos Bustamante and David Ke11er

CO 7. Cell Process Photosynthesis

CHAPTER 6 STUDY GUIDE. phosphate work. energy adenosine In order for organisms to carry out life processes their cells need (1).

Chem 310 rd. 3 Homework Set Answers

Virtual Lab 5 Photosynthesis

25 Instruments for Optical Spectrometry

CSUS Department of Chemistry Experiment 9 Chem. 1A

Unit 5.1 ~ Cell Energy: PHOTOSYNTHESIS

Pigment packaging effects in Thalassiosira pseudonana under light regulated steady-state growth

ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION (ESI) variable light emission created via direct ultrasonic exfoliation of

The Path of Carbon in Photosynthesis

UV-Vis optical fiber assisted spectroscopy in thin films and solutions

Photosynthesis. All Materials Cmassengale

Physics and the Quantum Mechanical Model

BLUE LIGHT, RED LIGHT, WHITE LIGHT GROWTH COMPARISON OF BRASSICA RAPA. Author(s) Redacted

Transcription:

TRANSFER OF THE EXCITATION ENERGY IN ANACYSTIS NIDULANS GROWN TO OBTAIN DIFFERENT PIGMENT RATIOS A. K. GHOSH AND GOVINDJEE From the Department of Botany, University of Illinois, Urbana. Dr. Ghosh's present address is the Biology Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York. ABSTRACT The blue-green alga, Anacystis nidulans, was grown in lights of different colors and intensities, and its absorption and fluorescence properties were studied. Strong orange light, absorbed mainly by phycocyanin, causes reduction in the ratio of phycocyanin to chlorophyll a; strong red light, absorbed mainly by chlorophyll, causes an increase in this ratio. This confirms the earlier findings of Brody and Emerson (12) on Porphyridum, and of Jones and Myers (8) on Anacystis. Anacystis cultures grown in light of low intensity show, upon excitation of phycocyanin, emission peaks at 600 mp, and 680 m[t, due to the fluorescence of phycocyanin and chlorophyll a, respectively. Changes in the efficiency of energy transfer from phycocyanin to chlorophyll a are revealed by changes in the ratios of these two bands. A decrease in efficiency of energy transfer from phycocyanin to chlorophyll a seems to occur whenever the ratio of chlorophyll a to phycocyanin deviates from the normal. Algae grown in light of high intensity show, upon excitation of phycocyanin, only a fluorescence band at 660 mtu and no band at 680 mju. This suggests reduced efficiency of energy transfer from phycocyanin to the strongly fluorescent form of chlorophyll a (chlorophyll a.) and perhaps increased transfer to the weakly fluorescent form of chlorophyll a (chlorophyll al). INTRODUCTION Algae containing phycobilins permit easier preferential excitation of one or the other of the two postulated photochemical pigment systems (1). The relative concentrations of chlorophyll a and phycobilins in algae depend on culture conditions. The photosynthetic efficiencies of cultures with different phycobilin-to-chlorophyll a ratios, have been studied in Porphyridium cruentum (2, 3) and in Anacystis nidulans (4). Brody and Brody (5) have studied induced changes in the efficiency of energy transfer from phycoerythrin to chlorophyll a in the red alga Porphyridium. 611

Here we present some observations on the fluorescence of Anacystis nidulans grown in lights of different color and intensity, and containing different proportions of phycocyanin and chlorophyll a. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES Anacystis nidulans was obtained from the collection of Starr (6) (culture number 625). It was grown in an inorganic medium [medium C of Kratz and Myers (7)] to which an equal volume of Warburg's buffer #9 (15 parts of 0.1 M K2C03 and 85 parts of 0.1 M NaHCO.) was added to provide carbon dioxide. Cultures were grown in white, orange, and red light. White light was obtained from a 750 watt tungsten lamp, orange light by filtering white light through a Balzers (Geraetebauanstalt, Balzers, Fiirstentum Liechtenstein) K5 filter (a broad band interference filter with maximum tranmission at 600 m[u and a half band width of 30 mgt), and red light through a Corning (Coming Glass Works, Coming, New York) color specification (C.S.) number 2-64 sharp cutoff filter (50% transmission at 670 mtu and 85% transmission at wavelengths above 720 my). These light beams were called "high white," "high orange," and "high red," respectively. Light intensities were measured by a Bi/Ag surface type Eppley thermopile (see Table I). The intensity of white light (high white) without any filters, was 2.0 X 107 TABLE I LIGHT ENERGIES IN ERGS CM-2 SEC-1 USED FOR GROWING DIFFERENT CULTURES "High white" light 2.0 X 107 "Low white" light 0.2 X 107 "High red" light 1.9 X 106 "Low red" light 0.2 X 106 "High orange" light 5 X 106 "Low orange" light 0.4 X 10$ ergs cm' sece. The low intensity beams ("low white," "low orange," and "low red") were obtained by using a 10% neutral density filter (Table I). In general, cultures grown in light of high intensity, when compared with those grown in light of low intensity, showed larger vacuoles, fewer cells, and had a 10 times slower growth rate; they showed less dark material in electron micrographs and contained about 23 less pigment. (The electron micrographs were made by Shimony [unpublished].) The rate of photosynthesis (measured by manometry) of cells grown in white light of high intensity was five to ten times lower than that of "low light cells;" whereas the respiration rate of the "high light cells" was about 2 times higher. The absorption spectra were measured in a Bausch and Lomb Incorporated (Rochester, New York) spectrophotometer (Spectronic 505) equipped with an integrated sphere, in a 1 cm deep aminco cuvette. The pigment ratios are characterized by comparison of the optical densities at 625 mmu (phycocyanin) and 678 mm (chlorophyll a). Since chlorophyll a has some absorption at 625 mu, and phycocyanin some absorption at 678 my, the optical density due to phycocyanin at 625 m,u and that due to chlorophyll a at 612 BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL VOLUME 6 1966

675 m,u, where calculated from the equations of Jones and Myers (8): (OD625) total = (OD625)PC + 0.244 (OD678) Chl, and (OD678) total = 0.110 (OD625)PC + (OD678) Chl, were OD stands for optical density, PC for concentration of phycocyanin, and Chl for that of chlorophyll a. The fluorescence instrument was described before (9, 10). Fluorescence was observed from the same side on which the exciting light fell. The depth of the suspension was 0.25 cm. Emission spectra were corrected for photomultiplier sensitivity and for variations in the transmission efficiency of the analyzing monochromator, and the spectra were plotted in terms of relative numbers of quanta. Thin suspensions of algae were used to reduce the reabsorption of fluorescence. The band width of all slits in the monochromator was 6.6 m1u. The degree of polarization of fluorescence was measured in some cultures with Weber's polarization instrument (11). The exciting light was mercury-cadmium light filtered through Corning glass filter, C.S. 4-72; the analyzing photomultipliers [EMI 9558B] were shielded by Schott (Jenaer glaswerk Schott & Gen., Mainz, West Germany) glass filters, RG-8. (The results of this experiment are mentioned only under the Discussion section.) All experiments were made at room temperature (22-25 C). RESULTS Absorption Spectra. The absorption spectra of Anacystis cells grown in white light of low intensity (labeled low white), in white light of high intensity (labeled high white), in orange light of low intensity (low orange), orange light of high intensity (high orange), red light of low intensity (low red), and in red light of high intensity (high red) are shown in Fig. 1. (All curves were adjusted to give the same value at 690 mnt.) It is clear from these curves that the pigmentation of Anacystis depends strongly on the intensity and color of light used in growing the culture. Generally, the proportion of the pigment which best absorbs the light supplied during the growth period, is reduced when strong light is used-as if by photochemical decomposition [cf. Brody and Emerson (12) and Jones and Myers (8)]. The color of weak light does not affect significantly the proportion of pigments. Florescence Spectra of Cells Grown in Red and White Light. The spectra of fluorescence excited by absorption at 580 m,u are presented in Fig. 2 (adjusted to coincide at 640 mmt), for cells grown in red light and white light of 2 different intensities. The fluorescence spectra have 2 major peaks: one at 660 my, due to phycocyanin, the other at 680 my, due to chlorophyll a. The latter is excited mainly by energy transfer from phycocyanin to chlorophyll [see Duysens (13) and French and Young (14)]. The differences between emission spectra shown in Fig. 2 can be explained by changes in the efficiency of energy transfer from phycocyanin to chlorophyll a. The relative efficiencies of chlorophyll a fluorescence were calculated from observed fluorescence intensities and the estimated per cent absorptions. Table II shows the results. The ratio of absorbancies of phycocyanin (PC) and chlorophyll a A. K. GHOSH AND GOVINDJEE Excitation Energy in Anacystis nidulans 613

Afnrl I I 0 0 4 HIGH RED 6) ~~~LOW RED.0W 00L 3.0 20, HIGH ORANGE cr_ 0 co 0. 0 LOW ORANGE / w -J0 r 0L02OWG WHITE Q01 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 WAVELENGTH, mut FIGURE 1 Absorption spectra of different cultures of Anacystis nidulans grown in lights of different intensity and color. Spectra of cells grown in high light intensities are shown with solid lines and those in low light intensities with broken lines. The ordinate labeled "white scale," "orange scale," and "red scale" are for cells grown in white, orange, and red light, respectively (see Table I and text). (Chl a) were calculated by applying Jones and Myers (8) formulae (column 3). The relative efficiency of directly emitted chlorophyll a fluorescence (column 6) was calculated by dividing the fluorescence intensity at 685 mtt by per cent absorption at 430 mu. (No energy transfer from carotenoids to chlorophyll a was assumed!) The fluorescence efficiency of phycocyanin fluorescence, upon excitation at 580 m,u (column 4) was obtained by dividing the fluorescence intensity at 660 m,u by the estimated per cent absorption of phycocyanin at 580 m,u. The fluorescence efficiency of phycocyanin-sensitized chlorophyll a fluorescence (column 5) was obtained from the relation: F685 - [f(chl a) + f(pc)]/a(pc), where F685 = fluorescence intensity at 685 mu; f(chl a) = intensity of direct chlorophyll a fluorescence excited at 580 mmt (estimated from the efficiency of direct chlorophyll a fluorescence, as observed in the blue band, and the per cent absorption by chlorophyll a at 580 mm); f(pc) = intensity of phycocyanin fluorescence at 685 mpm (estimated from the 614 BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL VOLUME 6 1966

2.5 2.0 ji.5 LO la0 0.5 IF_ L. F Sa o I... I --uw-ts-- ANA TS MDMLANS *-L0 RE I' - BASS S OECTRA I I LOW WHffE 660 / \.0/%~iON WHITE I I ' ~~~\. I\...I.... D I, 640 660 680 700 720 WAVELENGTH, S FIGURE 2 Florescence (emission) spectra of Anacystis nidulans (grown in red and white light); wavelength of exciting light, 580 m,u. The conditions of growth are indicated on the graph (see text for explanation). All emission spectra were corrected for variations in photomultiplier sensitivity and the efficiency of analyzing monochromator, in terms of quanta and not energy. Fluorescence intensities adjusted to coincide at 640 m,u are expressed in relative units. TABLE II CELLS GROWN IN RED AND WHITE LIGHT: FLUORESCENCE EFFICIENCIES (-), RELATIVE UNITS Excited at 580 MIA Excited at 430 mia 1 2 3 4 5 6 Sample Ratio no. Culture conditions PC/Chl a 'b PC i. Chl b Chl 1 "Low red" 1.00 1.89 2.86 0.67 2 "High red" 2.00 3.02 0.41 0.18 3 "High white" 0.74 2.46 1.45 0.61 4 "Low white" 1.05 2.21 2.06 0.40 fluorescence intensity of the same pigment at 660 mpt, and the ratio of fluorescence intensities at 685 mjl and 660 mu in pure phycocyanin) (13); A(PC) is the estimated per cent absorption by phycocyanin at 580 m,u. In red light cells, the chlorophyll a fluorescence efficiency, excited by 580 m', decreases from 2.86 to 0.41 when the phycocyanin fluorescence efficiency increases from 1.89 to 3.0 (columns 4 and 5, Table II). This suggests a decrease in transfer efficiency from phycocyanin to chlorophyll a. The same trend is seen in white light cells, when chlorophyll a fluorescence excited by 580 mu decreases from 2.06 to 1.45, the phycocyanin efficiency increases from 2.21 to 2.46. In both cases, increase in phycocyanin fluorescence in "high light" cultures does not fully account A. K. GHOSH AND GOVINDJEE Excitation Energy in Anacystis nidulans 615

r ai a a t m I I I I - a 1.2 I 1.0 5 id, oa 1I to IIO z 1. 1I PHYCO 2.3.1 It 0.0 o.s~ ~ J0 3 \ 0.4 /t - 0.3-0.2 0.0 ad his 0.4 I I I I 06U I i i i i i -0.2 I,1,,, 1 '640 660 60 700 720 ANACYSTIS EMISSION NIDULANS SPECTRA 620 640 660 680 7 0OO 72o WAVELENGTH, 'MtL, FIGURE 3 Fluorescence spectra of Anacystis nidulans grown in high intensity orange light; wavelength of excitation light, 580 m,. Curves 1 through 3 show the spectra with samples grown in decreasing intensities (in 10% steps) of orange light. Insert shows the difference fluorescence spectra (AF) for chlorophyll a fluorescence [obtained by subtracting phycocyanin (Phyco) emission band]. Phycocyanin (Phyco) emission band is redrawn from Duysens (13). for the decrease in chlorophyll a fluorescence; the latter is 2 to 3 times larger than the former. Since chlorophyll a in system I (Chl a,) is supposed to be weakly fluorescent, these results may suggest increased energy transfer from phycocyanin to chlorophyll a,, instead of chlorophyll a2 in "high light cultures." Transfer efficiency from phycocyanin to chlorophyll a2 seems to decrease as the pigment ratio of phycocyanin: chlorophyll-a (PC/Chl) deviates from normal (which we assume to correspond to a ratio of about 1.0 in column 3). Chlorophyll fluorescence efficiency in the red light cells and the white light cells, changes also when excited by light absorbed in chlorophyll a (column 6, Table II). This may indicate changes induced by the culture conditions in distribution of chlorophyll a between the two pigment systems (chlorophyll a2 in system II is known to be more strongly fluorescent than Chl al in system I). In these calculations (column 6, Table II), no corrections were made for the energy transfer from carotenoids to chlorophyll a; the differences may simply reflect changes in the latter. Fluorescence of Orange Light Cells. The relative fluorescence yields in cultures grown and maintained in orange light of different intensities, show an almost constant chlorophyll a fluorescence efficiency, with a single peak at about 616 BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL VOLUME 6 1966

680 mu when excited at 430 mu light (absorbed mainly by chlorophyll a). In some samples, however, phycocyanin seems to absorb some light at 430 m, (probably due to its high concentration), and a phycocyanin fluorescence peak is observed at 650 mu. The fluorescence emission spectra of orange light cells, upon excitation with 580 m,u light, are shown in Fig. 3. Curves 1 through 3 show the emission spectra for samples grown in orange light of decreasing intensity. These three samples were all grown in high intensity light but with intensity variations of about 10%. There is only a very small shoulder at about 680 mtu, indicating low efficiency of energy transfer from phycocyanin to chlorophyll a; the transfer efficiency increases as the intensity of light in which the cells were grown decreases. No quantitative conclusions were made from this set of experiments. DISCUSSION The intensity of the light in which the algae were grown is seen in this study to be of primary importance in determining the efficiency of energy transfer from phycocyanin to chlorophyll a. Both the color and the intensity of light determine the ratio of the concentration of the two pigments (see references 4, 8, and 12). Algae grown in red light of high intensity contain relatively more phycocyanin; cells grown in orange light of high intensity, relatively more chlorophyll a. Yet, the quantum yield of photosynthesis in both these samples is low, and energy transfer from phycocyanin to chlorophyll a2, as indicated by sensitized chlorophyll a fluorescence (Fig. 2 and curve 1 in Fig. 3) is poor. The total pigment concentrations are low in all cells grown in high light. If local concentrations change (14) parallel to the total ones, this must make energy transfer less efficient. Brody and Emerson (3) found that Porphyridium grown in the blue light had a lower quantum yield of photosynthesis (-0.05) when excited by green light (absorbed mainly in phycoerythrin) whereas those grown in green light had a higher quantum yield (0.09) under similar conditions of measurement. The authors suggested that this variability may be due to a change in the efficiency of transfer of excitation energy from phycoerythrin to chlorophyll a. Brody and Brody (5) later obtained evidence for changes in transfer efficiencies in Porphyridium. We have obtained similar evidence for changes in energy transfer in Anacystis cultures. Jones and Myers (4) earlier concluded that Anacystis grown in red light (BCJ red lamps) and having a lower chlorophyll a to phycocyanin ratio, show a lower activity of chlorophyll a in pigment system 1. (No conclusions concerning transfer efficiencies could be made in that work.) Since the growth conditions of Jones and Myers (4) and those used in the present paper were quite different, we do not attempt to correlate the two. (It would have been better if we had made comparable photosynthesis measurements on all our samples.) In the two-pigment system hypothesis, chlorophyll a exists in two forms as A. K. GHosH AND GOVINDJEE Excitation Energy in Anacystis nidulans 617

chlorophyll a2 (chlorophyll a in system 2) and chlorophyll a, (chlorophyll a in system 1). Chlorophyll a2 is often assumed to be (relatively) highly fluorescent, and chlorophyll a1 weakly fluorescent (Duysens 15). The decreased efficiency of sensitized chlorophyll a fluorencence in algae grown under light of high intensity, must be due to a decrease in the transfer efficiency from phycocyanin to the "fluorescent" chlorophyll a2. A decrease in transfer efficiency from phycocyanin to chlorophyll a2 (in high light cells as compared with low light cells) may be accompanied by an increase in efficiency of transfer from phycocyanin to the "nonfluorescent" chlorophyll a,, as evidenced by a larger decrease in chlorophyll a2 fluorescence efficiency than accounted for by the increase in phycocyanin fluorescence efficiency. Furthermore, we have observed a slightly higher ratio of fluorescence intensity at 720 m,u to that at 682 m,u in "high intensity samples," as compared to the "low intensity samples." (No significant change in the ratio of fluorescence intensity at 692 mu to that at 682 m,u was observed.) Since Vredenberg (16) (also see reference 10) has observed a shoulder around 730 m,u in the light-minus-dark difference spectrum, when cells of Schizothrix calcicula were excited with "system 1 light," our present observations may be taken to suggest an increased intensity of the chlorophyll a, band (730 m/u band?) in "high intensity cells." Furthermore, some experiments (made by us in Professor Weber's laboratory) show that Anacystis grown in orange light of high intensity has a 7% polarized fluorescence, as opposed to only 1% in cells grown in orange light of low intensity. Olson et al. (17) and Lavorel (18) have earlier ascribed polarized fluorescence to chlorophyll al. Altogether, it seems that in "high intensity cells," a lower efficiency of transfer from phycocyanin to chlorophyll a2 is coupled with increased efficiency of transfer from phycocyanin to chlorophyll al. This research was supported by National Science Foundation grants GB1610 and GB4040. We thank Professor E. Rabinowitch for valuable discussions and Mr. Jobie Spencer for technical assistance. This work was done while Dr. Ghosh was a Research Fellow (1963-1964) (of the Charles F. Kettering Foundation) at Urbana, Illinois. Received for publication 23 February 1966. REFERENCES 1. DUYSENS, L. N. M., and AMESZ, J., Biochim. et Biophysica Acta, 1962, 64, 243. 2. BRODY, M., and BRODY, S. S., Arch. Biochem. Biophysics, 1962, 92, 354. 3. BRODY, M., and EMERSON, R., J. Gen. Physiol., 1959, 43, 251. 4. JONES, L. W., and MYERS, J., Plant Physiol., 1964, 39, 938. 5. BRODY, S. S., and BRODY, M., Arch. Biochem. and Biophysics, 1959, 82, 161. 6. STARR, R. C., Am. J. Bot., 1960, 47, 67. 7. KRATZ, W. A., and MYERS, J., Am. J. Bot., 1955, 42, 6. 8. JONES, L. W., and MYERS, J., J. Phycology, 1956, 1, 6. 9. GOVINDJEE, in Currents in Photosynthesis, (J. B. Thomas and J. H. C. Goedheer, editors), Rotterdam, Ad. Donker, 1966, 93. 618 BIoPHYsIcAL JOURNAL VOLUME 6 1966

10. GOVINDJEE, and YANG, L., J. Gen. Physiol., 1966, 49, 763; Krey, A., and Govindjee, Biochim. et Biophysica Acta, 1966, 120, 1. 11. WEBER, G., J. Opt. Soc. America, 1956, 46, 962. 12. BRODY, M., and EMERSON, R., Am. J. Bot., 1959, 46,433. 13. DUYSENS, L. N. M., Ph.D. thesis, 1952, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands. 14. FRENCH, C. S., and YouNG, V. M. K., J. Gen. Physiol., 1952, 35, 873. 15. DUYSENS, L. N. M., Progr. Biophysics and Biophysic. Chem., 1964, 14, 3. 16. VREDENBERG, W. J., Ph.D. thesis, 1965, University of Leiden, The Netherlands. 17. OLSON, R. A., BUTLER, W., and JENNINGS, W. H., Biochim. et Biophysica Acta, 1961, 54, 615. 18. LAVOREL, J., Biochim. et Biophysica Acta, 1964, 88, 20. A. K. GHOSH AND GOVMDJEE Excitation Energy in Anacystis nidulans 619