China, Japan and Korea Trade in Goods and Approaches to CJKFTA

Similar documents
Options and Implications of Free Trade Arrangements in Asia. Jun Ma, Deutsche Bank AG Zhi Wang, ERS, USDA June 2002

Regional Integration in Central Asia

Essential Policy Intelligence

Important Developments in International Coke Markets

Trade and Direct Investment across the Taiwan Strait

East Asia Tariff Concession: A CGE analysis

Mineral Supply and Consumption Searching for a Twenty-First Century Balance

Nepal-China Economic Relationship: Learning and Unlearning from Chinese Model of Development

Liberalization of Trade in Services: Toward a Harmonized ASEAN++ FTA

PubPol 201. Module 3: International Trade Policy. Class 4 Outline. Class 4 Outline. Class 4 China Shock

Peoples, Places and Cultures in Africa, Asia and the Southwest Pacific

INDIA AND ASEAN TRADE: AN OVERVIEW

To understand the behavior of NR prices across key markets, during , with focus on:

Comprehensive Asian Development Plan: A Proposed framework

Cotton Economics Research Institute CERI Outlook Report

Regional Integration and Cooperation (Priority 4)

FRQ 1 As a country economically develops, the employment mix for various sectors of the economy changes.

External Implications of a Korea-US FTA

MONGOLIA S COKING COAL EXPORT POTENTIALS IN NORTHEAST ASIA. Dr. ENKHBOLD Voroshilov. Director, Mongolian Development Strategy Institute (NGO)

Do Policy-Related Shocks Affect Real Exchange Rates? An Empirical Analysis Using Sign Restrictions and a Penalty-Function Approach

Major Trade Trends in East Asia

Business Environment in a Global Context

Survey of Business Sentiment by Japanese Corporations in Thailand for the 1 st half of 2018

Gravity Analysis of Regional Economic Interdependence: In case of Japan

Application and Development of Geographical Indication Protection in China

More information at

Selected Papers from the 2 nd World Forum on China Studies (Abstracts) Panel 12 Shanghai's Development in Multi-scaled Perspectives

External Backward Linkage and External Forward Linkage. in Asian International Input-Output Table

Annual Ministerial Meeting of Foreign Ministers of Landlocked Developing Countries

Harmonization of Trade in Services by APEC members

Coking Coal A Strategic Market Outlook to 2020

ENHANCING THE SHARE OF LLDCs IN. (Priority 3 of APoA) Dr Mia Mikic Chief, Trade Policy and Analysis Section Trade and Investment Division

South and South-West Asia LLDCs

Chapter 9: Looking Beyond Poverty: The Development Continuum

Global and China Sodium Silicate Industry 2014 Market Research Report

Central Valley School District Social Studies Curriculum Map Grade 7. August - September

GEOGRAPHY YEAR 11 ATAR 2019 COURSE OUTLINE

Seaport Status, Access, and Regional Development in Indonesia

Grade 7 Social Studies

GLOBALIZATION OF ECONOMY PREMISES AND EFFECTS

TIGER: Tracking Indexes for the Global Economic Recovery By Eswar Prasad and Karim Foda

Workshop on APEC Coal Supply Security MONGOLIAN COAL SECTOR, TRENDS 2015 BAYARSAIKHAN DAVAASUREN

THEORIES OF GLOBAL INTERCONNECTIONS. APWH Unit 6 Part to Present

The trade dispute between the US and China Who wins? Who loses?

Statement. H.E Dr. Richard Nduhuura Permanent Representative of the Republic of Uganda to the United Nations New York

A Correlation of. Ohio s Learning Standards in Social Studies. Grade 5

Topic 4 Forecasting Exchange Rate

Geographically, Mongolia is a landlocked country in the heart of Asia

Chemical Industry in India. Presented By

Going East. Opportunities for U.S. Coal in Asia. Metal Bulletin s 7 th Indian Iron & Steel Conference New Delhi, India February 16, 2011

World Geography Fall 2013 Semester Review Project

Economic Benefit Study on Value of Spatial Information Australian Experience

International Court of Justice World Trade Organization Migration and its affects How & why people change the environment

Starting Assignment. What do you think is the greatest invention of the Industrial Revolution?

Global Coking Coal Market Report: 2018 Edition

The TransPacific agreement A good thing for VietNam?

A Study on Trade of Complementarity among Xinjiang and Its Neighboring Countries

World Geography. WG.1.1 Explain Earth s grid system and be able to locate places using degrees of latitude and longitude.

TIGER: Tracking Indexes for the Global Economic Recovery By Eswar Prasad, Karim Foda, and Ethan Wu

Next steps: what national and international statistical offices can do to improve our measures

2014/CTI/WKSP7/008 Experiences in Implementation of Safeguards and Transitional Safeguards from Business Perspective

Possible Impact of the ASEAN Chemical Safety Database

U.S. Origin Coking Coal in the Global Market

AAG CENTER FOR GLOBAL GEOGRAPHY EDUCATION Internationalizing the Teaching and Learning of Geography

Prentice Hall World Cultures: A Global Mosaic 2004 Correlated to: Wisconsin Model Academic Standards for Social Studies (By the end of Grade 12)

Web page. Username: student171 Password: geog17104

Geog 171b. Web page. No cell phones. Don t be like this. Username: student171 Password: geog

Why has globalisation brought such large increases in exports to some countries and not to others?

Unit Two: Development & Globalization

THE GRAVITY MODEL OF INTERREGIONAL TRADE: CASE OF EASTERN SIBERIA

Chapter 10: Location effects, economic geography and regional policy

Eastern Hemisphere Geography 7th Grade *Chapters 1-10 covered in 6 th Grade

T h o m a s B r e d g a a r d, P r o f e s s o r, P h. d.

Trade Challenges Facing LLDCs: How the ITT-LLDCs could respond to these issues

WORLD GEOGRAPHY INSTRUCTIONAL PACING GUIDE

ScienceDirect. Economic Globalization: From Microeconomic Foundation to National Determinants

Gabriel Felbermayr and Marina Steininger Trump s trade attack on China who will have the last laugh?

Presentation. Ms. Heidi Schroderus-Fox, Director, UN-OHRLLS

Globalization, Interdependence, & Interconnectedness

MEASURING THE ECONOMIC MASS THE ALBANIAN CASE

Central Asia on the New Silk Road: infrastructure, geography and society

NOWCASTING REPORT. Updated: April 15, 2016

INDIANA ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR SOCIAL STUDIES, WORLD GEOGRAPHY. PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT (If submission is not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

Centerville Jr. High School Curriculum Mapping (7 th Grade Geography) (Mike Day)

Spillovers from economic development: an interregional perspective

Implementation of the ESPON 2020 cooperation program. 16 January 2017 Anneloes van Noordt

Overview: Tracing the Progress toward the ASEAN Economic Community

Measuring Export Competitiveness

Grade 5: Social Studies Practices

JAPAN GCC TRADE DURING THE YEAR 2004 Record-high imports and exports:

Proposed AKS for 6 th Grade Social Studies

Unit 6: Industrialization and Development Part 3-4

NOWCASTING REPORT. Updated: September 23, 2016

Introduction to Development. Indicators and Models

The National Spatial Strategy

Country Report.

GEO GRAPHICAL RESEARCH

Mission Geography and Missouri Show-Me Standards Connecting Mission Geography to State Standards

Chapter 2 - Lessons 1 & 2 Studying Geography, Economics

AS Population Change Question spotting

Transcription:

China, Japan and Korea Trade in Goods and Approaches to CJKFTA National Academy of Economic Strategy Chinese Academy of Social Sciences FENG Lei fenglei@cass.org.cn

Goods Trade: the Foundation of CJKFTA General idea:trade in goods is still the basis of the international economic and trade relations New issues of FTA: service trade, investment arrangements, competition policies, environment, labor, Intellectual property and government procurement Particularity of goods trade in CJKFTA Export market Advantage of manufacturing The advantage differences in manufacturing

Changes of Interdependency Changes of interdependence in goods trade among t he three countries effect manufacturing complementary r elationship and their attitude to CJKFTA. (Changes are a s follows)

China:Goods Exports to Japan and Kore a

China:Goods Exports to Japan and Korea To Japan:14%(1991) 20%(peak ratio,1996) 8% (bottom,2011) China s goods exports increased by 26 times. (Exports to Japan rose by 14 times.) The dependency on Japan market went down. (Japan market became less important.) To South Korea:3%(1991) 4%(2011) The dependency on Korea market went up slightly. (Exports to Korea increased by 39 times and Korea market became more important.)

China:Imports from Japan and Korea

China:Imports from Japan and Korea From Japan:16%(1991) 23%(peak,1994) 11% (bottom,2011) The import dependency on Japan market went down. China s imports increased by 27 times and the imports from Japan rose by 19 times. From Korea:2%(bottom,1991) 12%(peak, 2005) 9%(2011) The dependency on Korea market is increasing. The imports volume from Korea rose by 147 times from U.S. $ 1.1 billion to U.S. $ 162.7 billion. Japan was the leading import origin in1991, but in 2011, Korea had equal shares almost.

Japan:exports to China and Korea

Japan:exports to China and Korea To China:3%(bottom,1991) 20%(peak,2011) The dependency on China is high. The exports volume increased by 2 times (18 times to China) and China market is more and more important. To Korea:6%(1991) 8%(2011) The dependency on Korea rose slightly. The exports volume increased by 2 times (3 times to Korea market)

Japan: imports from China and Korea

Japan: imports from China and Korea From China:6%(1991) 21%(2011) The imports volume increased by 3 times(13 times from China market). The imports dependency on China is increasing (more and more dependent on China s goods) From Korea:5%(1991)5%(2011) The imports volume increased by 3 times(3 times from Korea market). The imports dependency kept flat.

Korea: exports to China and Japan

Korea: exports to China and Japan To China:1%(1991) 24%(2011) To Japan:17%(1991) 7%(2011) Korea exports model:japan-oriented(1991)to Chinaoriented(turning point : 1997-2001 after Asian Financial Crisis)

Korea:imports from China and Japa n

Korea:imports from China and Japan From China:4%(1991) 16%(2011) From Japan:26%(1991) 13%(2011) Import model: shift from mainly dependent on Japan to dependent on both China and Japan, and China is slightly heavier.

The changes of interdependency: China China s exports ratio: 17%(1991)decreased to 12%(2011)(-5%=-6% Japan +1% Korea) China s export dependency on Japan and Korea is decreasing. China s imports ratio : 18%(1991)increased to 20%(2011) (2%=-5% Japan+7% Korea) China s import dependency on Japan and Korea is increasing.

The changes of interdependency: Japan Japan s export ratio: 9%(1991)increased to 28%(2011)(19%=17% China +2% Korea) Japan s import ratio : 11%(1991)increased to 26%(2011)(15%=15% China +0% Korea) Japan is more and more dependent on China and Korea as trading partners. Japan s dependency on China highly rose.

The changes of interdependency: Korea Korea s export ratio: 18%(1991)climbed to 31%(2011)(13%=23% China -10% Japan) Korea s import ratio : 30%(1911)declined to 29%(2011)(-1%=12% China-13% Japan) China and Japan swapped their places for Korea s imports and exports.

The dependency movement China s goods trade with Japan(imports + exports) decreased China s goods trade with Korea (imports + exports)increased Japan s goods trade with China and Korea (imports + exports)increased Korea s trade with China(imports +exports)increased Korea s trade with Japan(imports +exports)decreased

Goods trade and GDP(in billion) 2011 GDP Goods trade China 7298.1 3642.1 Japan 5869.5 1679.0 Korea 1116.2 1080.9 EU 17577.7 4474.4 NAFTA 17985.7 5291.2 Global average 69659.6 18217.0 Ratio of goods trade of GDP 50% 29% 97% 25% 29% 26%

Brief comment Interdependency of goods trade The impact on manufacturing The influence to the attitude of CJKFTA

CJKFTA 10+3 10+6 What is our goal? CKJFTA(quite difficult)(practical significance?) FTA including China, Japan and Korea(more space and flexibility)( 10+3, 10+6 ) (even TPP,the USA s wish to China)(Japan will join the negotiation.) If the three countries participate in a FTA which is more open than CJKFTA, the practical significance of CJKFTA will fade.

CJKFTA Uncertainty is the basic characteristics of the road to CJKFTA. the uncertainty on political willingness. Environmental uncertainty of global & regional economy. (ongoing European debt crisis weak recovery of US economy, China s rapid economic growth but troubled by trade frictions) uncertainty on trade (different FTA strategy) Impact from FTA practices( 10+6, TPP)

From three 10+1 to one 10+3 Three 10+1 China has sighed FTA with ASEAN,while Japan and Korea have signed the framework of FTA with ASEAN It is a practical road from three 10+1 to one 10+3.

10+6 or TPP A FTA framework with wide range : ASEAN + China, Japan, Korea, Australia, New Zeala nd and India Prospects of TPP: Dominated by the USA(return to Asia,making new international economic and trade rules) Complicated and difficult Difficult to adapt A FTA with more members and wide openness or just CJKFTA?

Thanks!