Supporting Information for Suppressing Klein tunneling in graphene using a one-dimensional array of localized scatterers

Similar documents
Physics 505 Fall Homework Assignment #4 Solutions

Physics 235 Chapter 8. Chapter 8 Central-Force Motion

Formulas for Angular-Momentum Barrier Factors Version II

HYDROGEN ATOM SELECTION RULES TRANSITION RATES

More Scattering: the Partial Wave Expansion

1.2 Partial Wave Analysis

SEMINAR 2. PENDULUMS. V = mgl cos θ. (2) L = T V = 1 2 ml2 θ2 + mgl cos θ, (3) d dt ml2 θ2 + mgl sin θ = 0, (4) θ + g l

Quantum Mechanical Models of Vibration and Rotation of Molecules Chapter 18

Physics 506 Winter 2006 Homework Assignment #6 Solutions

PHYS 110B - HW #1 Fall 2005, Solutions by David Pace Equations referenced as Eq. # are from Griffiths Problem statements are paraphrased

Applied Nuclear Physics (Fall 2006) Lecture 7 (10/2/06) Overview of Cross Section Calculation

Physics 505 Fall 2007 Homework Assignment #5 Solutions. Textbook problems: Ch. 3: 3.13, 3.17, 3.26, 3.27

hole h vs. e configurations: l l for N > 2 l + 1 J = H as example of localization, delocalization, tunneling ikx k

A Brief Introduction to Markov Chains and Hidden Markov Models

An approximate method for solving the inverse scattering problem with fixed-energy data

Approximation and Fast Calculation of Non-local Boundary Conditions for the Time-dependent Schrödinger Equation

A GENERAL METHOD FOR EVALUATING OUTAGE PROBABILITIES USING PADÉ APPROXIMATIONS

Gauss Law. 2. Gauss s Law: connects charge and field 3. Applications of Gauss s Law

DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF CIRCULAR FOOTINGS ON SATURATED POROELASTIC HALFSPACE

Legendre Polynomials - Lecture 8

Physics 127c: Statistical Mechanics. Fermi Liquid Theory: Collective Modes. Boltzmann Equation. The quasiparticle energy including interactions

Separation of Variables and a Spherical Shell with Surface Charge

LECTURE NOTES 9 TRACELESS SYMMETRIC TENSOR APPROACH TO LEGENDRE POLYNOMIALS AND SPHERICAL HARMONICS

T.C. Banwell, S. Galli. {bct, Telcordia Technologies, Inc., 445 South Street, Morristown, NJ 07960, USA

First-Order Corrections to Gutzwiller s Trace Formula for Systems with Discrete Symmetries

Introduction to LMTO method

Related Topics Maxwell s equations, electrical eddy field, magnetic field of coils, coil, magnetic flux, induced voltage

Physics 566: Quantum Optics Quantization of the Electromagnetic Field

Lecture 8 February 18, 2010

Why Doesn t a Steady Current Loop Radiate?

Theory and implementation behind: Universal surface creation - smallest unitcell

Data Search Algorithms based on Quantum Walk

Phys 7654 (Basic Training in CMP- Module III)/ Physics 7636 (Solid State II) Homework 1 Solutions

CONCHOID OF NICOMEDES AND LIMACON OF PASCAL AS ELECTRODE OF STATIC FIELD AND AS WAVEGUIDE OF HIGH FREQUENCY WAVE

Analytical Mean-Field Approach to the Phase Diagram of Ultracold Bosons in Optical Superlattices

LECTURE NOTES 8 THE TRACELESS SYMMETRIC TENSOR EXPANSION AND STANDARD SPHERICAL HARMONICS

/epjconf/

Module 22: Simple Harmonic Oscillation and Torque

Section 6: Magnetostatics

$, (2.1) n="# #. (2.2)

ASummaryofGaussianProcesses Coryn A.L. Bailer-Jones

The Group Structure on a Smooth Tropical Cubic

Two Kinds of Parabolic Equation algorithms in the Computational Electromagnetics

Lecture 6: Moderately Large Deflection Theory of Beams

1. Measurements and error calculus

Jackson 4.10 Homework Problem Solution Dr. Christopher S. Baird University of Massachusetts Lowell

Introduction to Simulation - Lecture 14. Multistep Methods II. Jacob White. Thanks to Deepak Ramaswamy, Michal Rewienski, and Karen Veroy

arxiv:nlin/ v2 [nlin.cd] 30 Jan 2006

High Spectral Resolution Infrared Radiance Modeling Using Optimal Spectral Sampling (OSS) Method

(Refer Slide Time: 2:34) L C V

D. Prémel, J.M. Decitre and G. Pichenot. CEA, LIST, F Gif-sur-Yvette, France

Lecture 9. Stability of Elastic Structures. Lecture 10. Advanced Topic in Column Buckling

Week 6 Lectures, Math 6451, Tanveer

VTU-NPTEL-NMEICT Project

Effects of energy loss on interaction dynamics of energetic electrons with plasmas. C. K. Li and R. D. Petrasso. 1 November 2008

Midterm 2 Review. Drew Rollins

2.1. Cantilever The Hooke's law

Wave Propagation in Nontrivial Backgrounds

Multiple Beam Interference

12.2. Maxima and Minima. Introduction. Prerequisites. Learning Outcomes

Self Inductance of a Solenoid with a Permanent-Magnet Core

APARTIALLY covered trench located at the corner of

Dislocations in the Spacetime Continuum: Framework for Quantum Physics

11.1 One-dimensional Helmholtz Equation

A SIMPLIFIED DESIGN OF MULTIDIMENSIONAL TRANSFER FUNCTION MODELS

On Integrals Involving Universal Associated Legendre Polynomials and Powers of the Factor (1 x 2 ) and Their Byproducts

Nonlinear Analysis of Spatial Trusses

Supplemental Information

Jost Function for Singular Potentials

arxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 26 Feb 2016

Bohr s atomic model. 1 Ze 2 = mv2. n 2 Z

Wavelet Galerkin Solution for Boundary Value Problems

221B Lecture Notes Notes on Spherical Bessel Functions

VI.G Exact free energy of the Square Lattice Ising model

Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics

In-plane shear stiffness of bare steel deck through shell finite element models. G. Bian, B.W. Schafer. June 2017

Wave Equation Dirichlet Boundary Conditions

Notes: Most of the material presented in this chapter is taken from Jackson, Chap. 2, 3, and 4, and Di Bartolo, Chap. 2. 2π nx i a. ( ) = G n.

A Simple and Efficient Algorithm of 3-D Single-Source Localization with Uniform Cross Array Bing Xue 1 2 a) * Guangyou Fang 1 2 b and Yicai Ji 1 2 c)

Lobontiu: System Dynamics for Engineering Students Website Chapter 3 1. z b z

Copyright information to be inserted by the Publishers. Unsplitting BGK-type Schemes for the Shallow. Water Equations KUN XU

17 Lecture 17: Recombination and Dark Matter Production

David Eigen. MA112 Final Paper. May 10, 2002

arxiv: v1 [math.ca] 6 Mar 2017

An Algorithm for Pruning Redundant Modules in Min-Max Modular Network

14 Separation of Variables Method

arxiv:math/ v2 [math.pr] 6 Mar 2005

arxiv: v1 [physics.flu-dyn] 2 Nov 2007

Nonperturbative Shell Correction to the Bethe Bloch Formula for the Energy Losses of Fast Charged Particles

Elements of Kinetic Theory

THE OUT-OF-PLANE BEHAVIOUR OF SPREAD-TOW FABRICS

Position probability density function for a system of mutually exclusive particles in one dimension

Keywords: Rayleigh scattering, Mie scattering, Aerosols, Lidar, Lidar equation

XSAT of linear CNF formulas

THE NUMERICAL EVALUATION OF THE LEVITATION FORCE IN A HYDROSTATIC BEARING WITH ALTERNATING POLES

Alberto Maydeu Olivares Instituto de Empresa Marketing Dept. C/Maria de Molina Madrid Spain

MARKOV CHAINS AND MARKOV DECISION THEORY. Contents

On the Computation of (2-2) Three- Center Slater-Type Orbital Integrals of 1/r 12 Using Fourier-Transform-Based Analytical Formulas

LECTURE 10. The world of pendula

Fourier Series. 10 (D3.9) Find the Cesàro sum of the series. 11 (D3.9) Let a and b be real numbers. Under what conditions does a series of the form

Transcription:

Supporting Information for Suppressing Kein tunneing in graphene using a one-dimensiona array of ocaized scatterers Jamie D Was, and Danie Hadad Department of Chemistry, University of Miami, Cora Gabes, Forida 334,USA Corresponding author: jwas@miamiedu

d y^ FIG Scattering of an incident Dirac x^ pane wave spinor of energy E = hν F k 0, φ ± K inc r) = k, from a ν F k X e i k r ±e iθ k one-dimensiona array of ocaized cyindricay symmetric scatterers in graphene The +K φ inc r) unit ce for the scattering array consists of a singe scatterer with the position of the n th scatterer given by r n = ndŷ In the foowing, the basic theory for intravaey mutipe scattering in graphene is presented and appied to the probem of a pane wave scattering from an infinite, one-dimensiona array of ocaized scatterers First, the basic formaism for cacuating the scattering soutions for a pane wave scattered from a finite number of ocaized scatterers in graphene is presented Next, the scattering wave functions, ψ ± K r), for the singe and two scatterer cases are expicity presented The theory is then extended to the case of scattering from an infinite, one-dimensiona array of ocaized scatterers in graphene where expicit expressions for the refection and transmission coefficients are provided Finay, the anaogous theory for scattering from an infinite, one-dimensiona array of ocaized scatterers in a two-dimensiona eectron gas DEG) is derived for comparison to the graphene resuts I INTRAVALLEY MULTIPLE SCATTERING FORMALISM In the foowing, we briefy review the basic formaism for intravaey mutipe scattering in graphene[, where the scattering soutions are expanded about either the + K or K Dirac points, where K = 4π 3 9b x and b = 4Å is the carbon-carbon bond ength in graphene Let φ ± K inc r) be an

incident Dirac pane wave spinor of energy E = hν F k = hν F λ normaized to unit fux aong the xdirection, φ K inc r) = k ν F k X e k r e iθ or φ K inc r) = k ν k F k X e k r e iθ with a wave k K vector given by k = k cosθ k ) x+k sinθ k )ŷ = k X x+k Y ŷ for θ k π, π ), and λ = π k K is the waveength of the incident wave In a cacuations, hν F = 0558 0 8 J-m In the foowing, a scattering potentia consisting of a inear arrangement of N + identica scatterers aong the ŷ- direction is considered with the scatterers positions indexed by the integer n [ N, N, r n = ndŷ where d is the spacing between adjacent scatterers [Fig The tota wave function for a Dirac pane wave spinor incident to the inear array of N + scatterers, ψ ± K r), can be written as: ψ ± K r) = φ ± K inc r) + N n= N 4i hν F k s Ĝ,± K r, r n,e) T,± K ψ r n) ) where s is the scattering ampitude of the th partia wave, + are the number of partia waves that are incuded in cacuation of ψ ± K r) in Eq ) T,± K ψ± K r)) r= r n, and where H ) with 0, T,± K ψ r n) Ĝ,± K r, r n,e) = i+ k H) k ρ n )e iθ n ±ih ) + k ρ n )e i+)θ n 4 hν F ±ih ) + k ρ n )e i+)θ n H ) k ρ n )e iθ n = ik ˆL +[H ) 0 k ρ n ) ±ˆL + [H) 0 k ρ n ) 4 hν F ±ˆL + + [H) 0 k ρ n ) ˆL [H ) 0 k ρ n ) z) is a hanke function of order, ρ n = r r n, e ±iθ n = r r n) x±iŷ), and T,± K is the -partia wave t matrix operator given by: T,± K = ˆL 0 0 ˆL + where ˆL ± = ik e ±iθ r ± i r θ ) = ik x ± i y ), and T 0,± K = is the identity matrix In writing Eq ), the scattering ampitudes were taken to satisfy the reationship s = s +), which is a consequence of the scattering potentia being identica over both inequivaent attice sites in graphene For the numerica cacuations performed in this work, each scatterer was modeed as a cyindricay symmetric step potentia with an effective radius of r s, ie, the potentia for the n th scatterer was given by V 0 Θ r r n ) where Θ r r n ) = if r r n r s and Θ r r n ) = 0 3 ρ n ) 3)

for r r n > r s To consider ony intravaey scattering and to negect intervaey scattering, r s b = 4Å For an individua scatterer, the th partia wave scattering ampitude is given[, by: s = J k r s )J + k r s ) J k r s )J + k r s ) J + k r s )H ) k r s ) J k r s )H ) + k r s ) where k = E V 0 hν F, and J z) is a besse function of the first kind of order, respectivey In a simuations, was chosen to take into account 999% of the tota scattering ampitude for an individua scatterer, ie, s 0999 s Knowedge of T,± K ψ r n) for a n and [0, competey determines ψ ± K r) in Eq ); these can be determined sef-consistenty as foows: T, ψ r m) = T, φ ± K inc r m) + n m 4) s T, [Ĝ,± K r m, r n,e) T,± K ψ r n) 5) where T, [Ĝ,± K r n, r j,e) = ik i + ) H ) k r n j )e i )θ n j ±ih ) + + k r n j )e iθ n j+ +) 6) 4 hν F ±ih ) + + k r n j )e iθ n j+ +) ) H ) k r n j )e iθ n j ) and r n j = r n r j and e ±iθ n j = r n r j ) x±iŷ) r n j In this case, Eq 5) formay represents a set of N + ) + ) equations that can be soved sef-consistenty as foows[: Define the foowing + ) coumn vectors reated to the tota and incident wave functions evauated at scatterer j [ N, N +,, N, N: T 0,± K ψ r j) T T ψ ± K r,± K ψ r j) j) = T,± K ψ r j), T φ inc,± K r j) = T max, ψ r j) T 0,± K φ ± K inc r j) T,± K φ ± K inc r j) T,± K φ ± K inc r j) T max, φ ± K inc r j) and the foowing N + ) + ) coumn vectors: T ψ ± K r N) T φ inc,± K r N) T ψ ± K r N ) T φ inc,± K r N ) T ψ ± K = T ψ ± K r 0), T φ inc,± K = T φ inc,± K r 0) T ψ ± K r N )) T φ inc,± K r N )) T ψ ± K r N) T φ inc,± K r N) 7) 8) 4

Using Eqs 7) and 8), Eq 5) for n = N to n = N and for = 0 to = can be written compacty as: T ψ ± K = TT) T φ inc,± K 9) where is the N + )max + ) N + ) + ) identity matrix, and TT is a N + ) + ) N + ) + ) matrix given by: 0 T T ± K r N, r N ) T T ± K r N, r N ) T T ± K r N, r N ) T T TT = ± K r N, r N ) 0 T T ± K r N, r N ) T T ± K r N, r N ) T T ± K r N, r N ) T T ± K r N, r N ) T T ± K r N, r N ) 0 where Ĝ 0,± K r n, r j,e) Ĝ,± K r n, r j,e) Ĝ,± K r n, r j,e) Ĝ r max, n, r j,e) T,± K [Ĝ0,± K r n, r j,e) T,± K [Ĝ,± K r n, r j,e) T,± K [Ĝ,± K r n, r j,e) T,± K [Ĝmax, r n, r j,e) T T ± K r n, r j ) = T,± K [Ĝ0,± K r n, r j,e) T,± K [Ĝ,± K r n, r j,e) T,± K [Ĝ,± K r n, r j,e) T,± K [Ĝmax, r n, r j,e) T max, [Ĝ0,± K r n, r j,e) T max, [Ĝ,± K r n, r j,e) T max, [Ĝ,± K r n, r j E) T max, [Ĝmax, r n, r j,e) 0) Ŝ max ) and Ŝ max = 4i hν F k s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 s max 0 ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 s max Using Eq 8) and Eq 0), ψ ± K r) in Eq ) can be written compacty as: ψ ± K r) = φ ± K inc r) + ĜG ± K r) T ψ ± K = φ ± K inc r) + ĜG ± K r) TT) T φ inc,± K 3) 5

where ĜG ± K r) is a N +) +) matrix, ĜG ± K [ĜG r, r r) = N ) ĜG r, r N ) ĜG r, r N ) where ĜG r, r j ) = 4i hν [ F s k 0 Ĝ 0,± K r, r j,e) s Ĝ,± K r, r j,e) s max Ĝ max, r, r j,e) 4) II SCATTERING FROM A SINGLE SCATTERER We wi first consider the probem of scattering from a singe scatter ocated at r 0 = 0 In this case, Eq 5) becomes T, ψ 0) = T, φ ± K inc T, ψ 0) = Inserting Eq 5) into Eq ) gives: 0), which gives: k ν F k X ψ ± K r) = φ ± K inc r) + 4i hν F s Ĝ k,± K r,0,e) T,± K ψ 0) = φ ± K i k s inc r) + ν F k X e i θ k e i +)θ k 5) H ) k r)e iθ 0 θ k ) + ih+ k r)e i+)θ 0 θ k ) ±e iθ k H ) k r)e iθ 0 θ k ) + ih ) + k r)e i+)θ 0 θ k ) ) 6) where r = r r 0 For k r, Eq 6) can be approximated by: ψ ± K r) = φ ± s e i π ) 4 cos + K inc r) + θ 0 θ k)) πνf k X r e i θ 0 θ k θ 0 θ ±e i k 7) As k r, the scattered wave function asymptoticay decays to zero as r initia pane wave, ψ ± K r) φ ± K inc r) eaving ony the III SCATTERING FROM TWO IDENTICAL SCATTERERS Consider two identica scatterers, one ocated at r 0 = 0 and the other at r = dŷ In this case, Eq ) becomes: ψ ± K r) = φ ± K inc r) + 4i hν F s [Ĝ,± k K r, r 0,E) T,± K ψ r 0) + Ĝ,± K r, r,e) T,± K ψ r ) = φ ± K inc r) + ĜG ± K r) TT) T φ inc,± K 8) 6

where 0 T T TT = ± K r, r 0 ) T T ± K r 0, r ) 0 T φ inc,± K = eik Y d T φ inc,± K r 0) T φ inc,± K r 0) ±e iθ k e iθ k ±e iθ k T φ inc,± K r k 0) = ν F k X e iθ k ±e 3iθ k e iθ k ±e i+)θ k ĜG ± K [ĜG r, r r) = ) ĜG r, r 0 ) 9) Formay, inverting TT requires finding the roots to a poynomia of order 4 + ), which must be numericay soved when > 0 As in the singe scattering case, the scattered wave function in Eq 8) scaes as r for k ρ k r and k ρ 0 k r, which gives ψ ± K r) φ ± K inc r) for k r IV SCATTERING FROM AN INFINITE ONE-DIMENSIONAL ARRAY OF SCATTERERS In the foowing, the theory for the scattering of pane waves from an infinite, periodic onedimensiona array of identica scatterers N ) with attice constant d [Figure is presented From transationa symmetry, the tota wave function satisfies the reation that ψ ± K r + ndŷ) = ψ ± K r)eik Y nd, which means that ony ψ ± K r) between d y d needs to be cacuated To cacuate ψ ± K r) in Eq ), one can use the fact that transationa symmetry impies that T,± K ψ r n) = e ik Y nd T,± K ψ r 0), in which case the tota wave function in Eq ) can be written as: ψ ± K r) = φ ± K inc r) + n= 4i hν F k s Ĝ,± K r,ndŷ,e)eindk Y T,± K ψ r 0) 0) 7

The various T,± K ψ ±K r 0 ) in Eq 0) are determined sef-consistenty by: T, ψ r 0) = T, φ ± K inc r 0) + n 0 s [ T,Ĝ, r 0, r n,e) e ink Y d T,± K ψ r 0) ) Eq ) gives a tota of + ) sets of equations, which can be written as: TG ) T ψ r 0) = T φ ± K inc r 0) ) where is a max +) +) identity matrix, T ψ ± K r 0) and T φ ± K inc r 0) are +) coumn vectors given by: ψ ± K r 0) T T ψ ± K r,± K ψ r 0) 0) = T,± K ψ r 0) T max, ψ r 0), T φ ± K inc r k 0) = ν F k X ±e iθ k e iθ k ±e iθ k e iθ k ±e 3iθ k e iθ k ±e +)iθ k 3) and TG is a max + ) + ) matrix given by: s 0 G 0,0 s G 0, s max G 0,max s TG = 0 G,0 s G, s max G,max 4) with G, = i + = e ik Y nd n 0 s 0 G max,0 s G max, s max G max, ) H ) k n d)e i )θ 0n ±ih ) + + k n d)e i+ +)θ 0n ±ih ) + + k n d)e i+ +)θ 0n ) H ) S k d,k Y d) ± ) + + S + +k d,k Y d) ±S + +k d,k Y d) ) S k d,k Y d) where e ±iθ 0n = i n n and S k d,k Y d) = n= k n d)e i )θ 0n 5) ) H ) k nd) e ik Y nd + ) e ik Y nd 6) 8

The attice sum, S k d,k Y d) in Eq 6), can be efficienty cacuated using a sma modification to a previousy pubished method[3 as: [ S k d,k Y d) = π e i π 4 k Y d) t i) + i ) + it a + ti ) + i ) + it e ik d +it dt + it e ik d +it +k Y d) ) + ) π e i π 4 +k Y d) a dt 0 0 [ t i) + i + it ) + ti ) + i + it ) e ik d +it + it e ik d +it k Y d) ) 7) In this work, the expression for S k d,k Y d) in Eq 7) was numericay integrated using MATLAB[4, where the upper imit of the integras in Eq 7) was chosen to be a = 4000 Additionay, the individua sums that comprise Ĝ,±K r,ndŷ,e) in Eq 0) can be cacuated[5 using the foowing pane wave expansion that is vaid for x 0: L ± [H) 0 k ρ n )e ik Y nd = n= d = d, and kn) X = k e ikn) Y y+kn) X x ) n= k n) X e ikn) Y y+kn) X x ) n= k n) X k n) X signx) ± ikn) k Y ) signx)e ±isignx)θ ) k n) 8) ) where k n) Y = k Y + πn d k n) ±iθ Y and e k n) = kn) X ±ikn) Y k ) i k n) Y k and e ±iθ k n) = i kn) X ±kn) Y k for k k n) Y Note that kn) X wi be rea for n N = { } { } [N min,n max where N min = k +k Y )d π and N max = k k Y )d + π, where {z} + corresponds to the smaest integer greater than z, and {z} corresponds to the argest integer ess than z In this case, ψ ± K r) in Eq 0) can be written as [for x 0: for k k n) Y, and kn) X = ψ ± K r) = φ ± K inc r) + n= s d e ikn) Y y+kn) X x ) k n) X signx)) e isignx)θ k n) ±signx)e isignx)+)θ k n) ±signx)e isignx)+)θ k n) e isignx)θ k n) T,± K ψ r 0) In Eq 9), ψ ± K r) consists of a series of pane waves for n N that are either transmitted [x > 0 or refected [x < 0 from the scattering array aong with evanescent waves aong the x-direction that are freey propagating aong the ŷ-direction for n N These types of evanescent waves have been predicted to exist in graphene for one-dimensiona quantum wes[6 for certain vaues of 9 9)

k Y, quantum we potentia and width For the scattering array, however, it is the periodicity of the one-dimensiona array of scatterers that generates the evanescent waves in ψ ± K r) Finay, it shoud be noted that cacuating ψ ± K r) using a pane wave expansion in Eq 9) is computationay efficient for x d since the number of pane and evanescent waves that significanty contribute to ψ ± K r) is on the order of O[N + N However, the number of evanescent waves that contribute significanty to ψ ± K r) increases dramaticay as x 0, which renders the pane wave expansion in Eq 9) as an inefficient method to cacuate ψ ± K r) In this case, the sum of hanke functions in Eq 8) shoud be expicity evauated Note aso that athough the expression for ψ ± K x x + yŷ) in Eq 9) is vaid ony for x 0, the wave function is continuous at x = 0 since im x 0 ψ ± K x x + yŷ) = im x 0+ ψ ± K x x + yŷ) for y nd, which can be seen using the hanke sum expressions for S k d,k Y d) in Eq 6) V TRANSMISSION AND REFLECTION FROM A ONE-DIMENSIONAL ARRAY OF SCAT- TERERS IN GRAPHENE From Eq 9), the transmitted wave function [x > 0 wi consist of a pane waves in ψ ± K r in Eq 9) that are scattered aong the Bragg directions, k n) = k n) X x + kn) Y ŷ for n N, ψ± K T r), which can be written as: ψ ± K T r) = T n e ikn) Y y+kn) n N X x) k ν F k n) X ±e iθ k n) where the sum in Eq 30) is over a open channes, n N, with the transmission coefficient for the n th open channe given by: s T n = δ n0 + νf d k k n) X s = δ n0 + νf d k k n) X ±e iθ k n) eiθ n) k e iθ k n) ±e i+)θ k n) ±e i+)θ k n) ±e i+)θ k n) e iθ k n) T 30) T,± K ψ r 0) T,± K ψ r 0) 3) where δ i j is the Kronecker deta δ i j = 0 for i j and δ i j = for i = j) The tota transmission probabiity is given by T tot = n N T n 0

Likewise, the refected wave function x < 0), ψ ± K R r), is given by: ψ ± K R r) = R n e ikn) Y y kn) X x) k n N ν F k n) X where R n = = ) s νf d k k n) X ) s νf d k k n) X e iθ k n) e iθ n) k e i+)θ k n) e iθ k n) e iθ k n) e i+)θ k n) e i+)θ k n) e iθ k n) T 3) T,± K ψ r 0) T,± K ψ r 0) 33) The transmission and refection coefficients satisfy the unitarity condition, n N R n + T n = VI SCATTERED WAVE FUNCTION FROM AN INFINITE ONE-DIMENSIONAL ARRAY OF SCATTERERS IN A TWO-DIMENSIONAL ELECTRON GAS DEG) In the foowing, we generaize previous work[7 on scattering of pane waves from a onedimensiona periodic grating in a DEG to incude higher partia waves [ > 0 for comparison with the resuts derived for graphene Consider an incident wave with effective mass m and energy h k m E = and normaized to unit fux aong the x direction, φ ac inc r) = m hk X e i k r, where k = k X x + k Y ŷ = k cosθ ) x + k k sinθ )ŷ is the wave vector k In this case, the tota wave function, ψ ac r), is given by [for x 0: ψ ac r) = φinc r) ac + = φinc r) ac + n= = e ik Y nd n= L = sign) where again k n) Y = k Y + πn d, and kn) X = k ) k and e ±iθ k n) and k n) X = i k n) where N min = Y { k +k Y )d π } [ H ) 0 k ρ n ) L sign) [ψac r 0 ) e ikn) Y y+kn) X x ) d k n) signx)) e isignx)θ k n) L sign) [ψac r 0 ) X = i kn) k n) Y X ±kn) Y k { k k Y )d π ) and e ±iθ k n) = kn) X ±ikn) Y k 34) for k k n) Y, for k k n) Y For n N = [N min,n max } is rea Furthermore, the various and N max =, + kn) X L ± [ψac r 0 ) are determined from soving the foowing equation: ac ) TG T ψ ac r 0 ) = T φ inc r ac 0 ) 35)

ac where is a max + ) + ) identity matrix, TG is a + ) + ) matrix ac with the m,n) eement given by TG ) = ac + n S m nk d,k Y d) In this case, TG can be expicity written as: ac TG = S 0 k d,k Y d) S k d,k Y d) m,n S k d,k Y d) 0 S k d,k Y d) S +k d,k Y d) S max k d,k Y d) S max 0k d,k Y d) 0 S +k d,k Y d) S max +k d,k Y d) S max+k d,k Y d) S max k d,k Y d) S k d,k Y d) 0 S k d,k Y d) S 0k d,k Y d) S max k d,k Y d) S k d,k Y d) 0 S k d,k Y d) S k d,k Y d) S k d,k Y d) S 0 k d,k Y d) 36) where S k d,k Y d) can be evauated using Eq 7), and: L [ψ ac r 0 ) L [ψ ac r 0 ) T ψ ac r 0 ) = ψ ac r 0 ), T φ inc r ac 0 ) = e i k r 0 m hk X L + [ψ ac r 0 ) L + [ψac r 0 ) e iθ k e i )θ k e i )θ k e iθ k 37) For a scattering potentia given by V ac r,e) = n= V ac E)Θ r r n ) where Θz) = for z r s and Θz) = 0 for z > r s, the scattering ampitudes are given by = J k r s )J + k r s ) J k r s )J + k r s ) k H ) + k r s )J k r s ) k J + k r s )H ) k r s ) 38) me Vac E)) m E Vac E) where k = me, and k h = for E V h ac E) or k = i for E < V h ac E) Note that = in Eq 38) For comparing the cacuations in a DEG to the cacuations in graphene, the magnitudes of k and k for the DEG were chosen to be the same as in the graphene [detais are given in the caption of Figure 3 in the main manuscript In this case, the transmitted and refected wave functions, ψ ac T are determined from Eq 34): r) for x > 0 and ψac r) for x < 0, R m ψt ac r) = Tn ac e ikn) Y y+kn) X x) n N hk n) X m ψr ac r) = R ac n e ikn) Y y kn) X x) n N hk n) X 39)

where the refection and transmission coefficients satisfy the unitarity condition, n N T ac n + R ac n =, and are given by: T ac n = δ n0 + R ac n = sac = d sac = m hk n) X ) m d e iθ k n) L sign) [ψac r 0 ) hk n) e iθ k n) L sign) [ψac r 0 ) X 40) Like in graphene, was chosen to take into account 999% of the tota scattering ampitude for an individua scatterer in the DEG, ie, max = 0999 = s ac ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work was supported by the Nationa Science Foundation under CHE - 056846 and from funds from the University of Miami [ Vaishnav, J Y, Anderson, J Q & Was, J D Intravaey mutipe scattering of quasipartices in graphene Phys Rev B 83, 65437 0) [ Katsneson, M I & Novoseov, K S Graphene: New bridge between condensed matter physics and quantum eectrodynamics So State Comm 43, 3 3 007) [3 Yasumoto, K & Yoshitomi, K Efficient cacuation of attice sums for free-space periodic green s function IEEE Trans Antennas Propagat 47, 050 055 999) [4 Mathworks Matab http://wwwmathworkscom [5 Nicorovici, N A, McPhedran, R C & Petit, R Efficient cacuation of the green s function for eectromagnetic scattering by gratings Phys Rev E 49, 4563 4577 994) [6 Pereira, J M, Minar, V, Peeters, F M & Vasiopouos, P Confined states and direction-dependent transmission in graphene quantum wes Phys Rev B 74, 04544 006) [7 Vaishnav, J Y, Was, J D, Apratim, M & Heer, E J Matter-wave scattering and guiding by atomic arrays Phys Rev A 76, 0360 007) 3