FUNDAMENTAL PARAMETER METHOD FOR THE LOW ENERGY REGION INCLUDING CASCADE EFFECT AND PHOTOELECTRON EXCITATION

Similar documents
FUNDAMENTAL PARAMETER METHOD USING SCATTERING X-RAYS IN X-RAY FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS

MS482 Materials Characterization ( 재료분석 ) Lecture Note 4: XRF

EDS User School. Principles of Electron Beam Microanalysis

MT Electron microscopy Scanning electron microscopy and electron probe microanalysis

NEW CORRECTION PROCEDURE FOR X-RAY SPECTROSCOPIC FLUORESCENCE DATA: SIMULATIONS AND EXPERIMENT

DETERMINATION OF FLUORESCENCE YIELDS USING MONOCHROMATIZED UNDULATOR RADIATION OF HIGH SPECTRAL PURITY AND WELL-KNOWN FLUX

LAB REPORT ON XRF OF POTTERY SAMPLES By BIJOY KRISHNA HALDER Mohammad Arif Ishtiaque Shuvo Jie Hong

Structural Characterization of Giant Magnetoresistance Multilayers with New Grazing Incidence X-ray Fluorescence

COMPARISON OF THREE UNIVERSAL CURVES FOR THE ESCAPE PROBABILITY OF X-RAY EXCITED ELECTRONS - I. THEORY

LAB 01 X-RAY EMISSION & ABSORPTION

Chemistry Instrumental Analysis Lecture 19 Chapter 12. Chem 4631

An Analysis of Secondary Enhancement Effects in Quantitative XRFA

Interaction X-rays - Matter

Electron probe microanalysis - Electron microprobe analysis EPMA (EMPA) What s EPMA all about? What can you learn?

Chemistry 311: Instrumentation Analysis Topic 2: Atomic Spectroscopy. Chemistry 311: Instrumentation Analysis Topic 2: Atomic Spectroscopy

Röntgenpraktikum. M. Oehzelt. (based on the diploma thesis of T. Haber [1])

AEROSOL FILTER ANALYSIS USING POLARIZED OPTICS EDXRF WITH THIN FILM FP METHOD

1 of 5 14/10/ :21

Quantitative XRF Analysis. algorithms and their practical use

X-rays. X-ray Radiography - absorption is a function of Z and density. X-ray crystallography. X-ray spectrometry

RADIOACTIVE SAMPLE EFFECTS ON EDXRF SPECTRA

FEASIBILITY OF IN SITU TXRF

Horst Ebel, Robert Svagera, Christian Hager, Maria F.Ebel, Christian Eisenmenger-Sittner, Johann Wernisch, and Michael Mantler

Overview of X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis

XUV 773: X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis of Gemstones

QUANTITATIVE TEY (TOTAL ELECTRON YIELD) - THEORY, INSTRUMENTATION AND EXPRIMENTAL RESULTS

Small-Angle X-ray Scattering (SAXS)/X-ray Absorption Near Edge Spectroscopy (XANES).

X-ray Absorption and Emission Prepared By Jose Hodak for BSAC program 2008

A TES Bolometer for THz FT-Spectroscopy

Radiation interaction with matter and energy dispersive x-ray fluorescence analysis (EDXRF)

X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy

X-Ray Emission and Absorption

X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)

How Does It All Work? A Summary of the IDEAS Beamline at the Canadian Light Source

Generation of X-Rays in the SEM specimen

Elemental analysis by X-ray f luorescence. Sequential benchtop WDXRF spectrometer

X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)

Photoemission Spectroscopy

Inelastic soft x-ray scattering, fluorescence and elastic radiation

Portable type TXRF analyzer: Ourstex 200TX

CHEM*3440. X-Ray Energies. Bremsstrahlung Radiation. X-ray Line Spectra. Chemical Instrumentation. X-Ray Spectroscopy. Topic 13

INFLUENCE OF GROWTH INTERRUPTION ON THE FORMATION OF SOLID-STATE INTERFACES

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MONTE CARLO-LIBRARY LEAST- SQUARES APPROACH TO ENERGY DISPERSIVE X-RAY FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS

Laboratory and Synchrotron Radiation total. reflection X-ray fluorescence: New Perspectives in. Detection Limits and Data Analysis

IMPROVEMENT OF DETECTION LIMITS OF A PORTABLE TXRF BY REDUCING ELECTRICAL NOISE

MT Electron microscopy Scanning electron microscopy and electron probe microanalysis

Characterization of high temperature solar thermal selective absorber coatings at operation temperature

X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)

FUNDAMENTAL PARAMETERS ANALYSIS OF ROHS ELEMENTS IN PLASTICS

Understanding X-rays: The electromagnetic spectrum

PB I FEL Gas-Monitor Detectors for FEL Online Photon Beam Diagnostics BESSY

XRF books: Analytical Chemistry, Kellner/Mermet/Otto/etc. 3 rd year XRF Spectroscopy Dr. Alan Ryder (R222, Physical Chemistry) 2 lectures:

2. X-ray Sources 2.1 Electron Impact X-ray Sources - Types of X-ray Source - Bremsstrahlung Emission - Characteristic Emission

Lecture 23 X-Ray & UV Techniques

Bragg reflection :determining the lattice constants of monocrystals

Quantitative determination of the effect of the harmonic component in. monochromatised synchrotron X-ray beam experiments

X-ray Spectroscopy. Danny Bennett and Maeve Madigan. October 12, 2015

Lecture 5. X-ray Photoemission Spectroscopy (XPS)

X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) Prof. Paul K. Chu

PERFORMANCE OF A ROOM TEMPERATURE GAS PROPORTIONAL SCINTILLATION COUNTER IN X-RAY ANALYSIS OF METALLIC ALLOYS EXCITED WITH ALPHA PARTICLES

X-ray CCD calibration system using #uorescent lines

X-RAY DATA BOOKLET Center for X-ray Optics and Advanced Light Source Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

The quantum e$ciency of pn-detectors from the near infrared to the soft X-ray region

CALCULATION METHODS OF X-RAY SPECTRA: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Chemical Analysis in TEM: XEDS, EELS and EFTEM. HRTEM PhD course Lecture 5

Diffractometer. Geometry Optics Detectors

III. Energy Deposition in the Detector and Spectrum Formation

MSE 321 Structural Characterization

MICRO-TOMOGRAPHY AND X-RAY ANALYSIS OF GEOLOGICAL SAMPLES

print first name print last name print student id grade

ABSOLUTE AIR-KERMA MEASUREMENT IN A SYNCHROTRON LIGHT BEAM BY IONIZATION FREE-AIR CHAMBER

Summer Students lectures

Copyright(c)JCPDS-International Centre for Diffraction Data 2001,Advances in X-ray Analysis,Vol

2 Improvements of Programs 2.1 L-X ray Energy dependent L subshell cross sections In 1996 version of L-X ray calculation [5], the ratio of L sub

Appearance Potential Spectroscopy

X-ray Energy Spectroscopy (XES).

Analytical Methods for Materials

Performance of high pressure Xe/TMA in GEMs for neutron and X-ray detection

An Introduction to Diffraction and Scattering. School of Chemistry The University of Sydney

IV. Surface analysis for chemical state, chemical composition

Multilayer Interference Coating, Scattering, Diffraction, Reflectivity

Time-Resolved μ-xrf and Elemental Mapping of Biological Materials

Visualization of Xe and Sn Atoms Generated from Laser-Produced Plasma for EUV Light Source

Materials Analysis Using Fast Ions

Photon and primary electron arithmetics in photoconductors for digital mammography: Monte Carlo simulation studies

Understanding X-rays: The electromagnetic spectrum

X-ray Spectroscopy. c David-Alexander Robinson & Pádraig Ó Conbhuí. 14th March 2011

The HXDS Solid State Detectors

Ultrafast X-Ray-Matter Interaction and Damage of Inorganic Solids October 10, 2008

X-RAY SCATTERING AND MOSELEY S LAW. OBJECTIVE: To investigate Moseley s law using X-ray absorption and to observe X- ray scattering.

Introduction to XAFS. Grant Bunker Associate Professor, Physics Illinois Institute of Technology. Revised 4/11/97

Basics of Synchrotron Radiation Beamlines and Detectors. Basics of synchrotron radiation X-ray optics as they apply to EXAFS experiments Detectors

LASER-COMPTON SCATTERING AS A POTENTIAL BRIGHT X-RAY SOURCE

Development of a Compact XAFS Measurement Chamber under Atmospheric Pressure in the Soft X-ray Region

Energy Spectroscopy. Excitation by means of a probe

Analysis of Cadmium (Cd) in Plastic Using X-ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy

Energy Spectroscopy. Ex.: Fe/MgO

The RX-6000 Sulfur in Oil Analyzer For the analysis of Sulfur in Oil and other elements from S to U

Measurements of K- shell production cross-section and fluorescence yield for Y element

Atomic and nuclear physics

Transcription:

Copyright (c)jcpds-international Centre for Diffraction Data 2002, Advances in X-ray Analysis, Volume 45. 511 FUNDAMENTAL PARAMETER METHOD FOR THE LOW ENERGY REGION INCLUDING CASCADE EFFECT AND PHOTOELECTRON EXCITATION N.Kawahara 1, T.Shoji 1, T.Yamada 1, Y.Kataoka 1, B.Beckhoff 2, G.Ulm 2 and M.Mantler 3 1 Rigaku Corporation, Akaoji 14-8, Takatsuki, Osaka 569-1146, Japan 2 Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Abbestraße 2-12, D-10587 Berlin, Germany 3 Institut für Angewandte und Technische Physik, Technische Universität Wien, Wiedner Hauptstraße 8-10, A-1040 Wien, Austria ABSTRACT We have demonstrated the cascade effect and the secondary photoelectron excitation effect by means of Cr-L line measurements by using monochromatic radiation of high spectral purity and well-known flux provided by two beamlines of the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Germany's national institute of metrology at the electron storage ring BESSY II. The plane grating monochromator beamline for undulator radiation covers the energy range from 30 ev to 1.9 kev, and the four-crystal monochromator beamline for synchrotron radiation from 1.75 kev to 10.5 kev. The Cr-L fluorescence intensities show a considerable jump at Cr-K edge energy as the source photon energy rises, indicating the magnitude of the cascade effect. The fundamental parameter method including the cascade effect and the secondary photoelectron excitation effect shows good agreement with the measurement. The evaluation of this computation method for the measurement carried out with a conventional XRF spectrometer also shows good performance of the calculation. INTRODUCTION Low-energy characteristic X-ray measurements play a key role in X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis of light elements and of thin layer materials. Besides primary excitation by incident X- rays and secondary excitation by fluorescent X-rays, there are other secondary processes which contribute to low-energy characteristic X-ray emissions. One of them is the excitation by photoelectrons, which has been introduced into a fundamental parameter method 1 and evaluated experimentally 2. Another process is the emission of L-series X-rays following radiative and nonradiative relaxations of the K-shell ionization. This cascade effect on L-series X-ray emission occurs when the energy of source X-rays is higher than the K-shell binding energy, i.e. in a measurement of L-lines of low energy using an XRF spectrometer with, for example, a Rh-target end-window tube. The contribution of the cascade effect exceeds that of direct excitation in these situations. Obviously, this effect can contribute also to M-series X-ray emission. Although this cascade effect was studied already 3, neither a recent implementation in a fundamental parameter software nor experimental evaluation have been reported. The extension of XRF application, however, requires measurements of L- or M-lines, in which the cascade effect arises.

Copyright (c)jcpds-international Centre for Diffraction Data 2002, Advances in X-ray Analysis, Volume 45. 512 In this paper, we demonstrate the implementation of the cascade effect into the fluorescent intensity calculation as well as its experimental evaluation using monochromatic radiation provided by two PTB beamlines and a conventional XRF spectrometer. CALCULATION The implementation formula used for the cascade effect term is shown in Figure 1. Here, the values given by Rao et al. 4 for the total number of holes in an L-subshell after relaxation of K- shell have been used. I Cascade iqs µ ( λ ) iqs dz dλi λ ρ z wik ipτ i λ n i p q ψ z in ψ 0 ( )exp + ( ), sin sin λ out = µ ( λ) ω iq R s iq λ : Incident X-ray wavelength I 0 (λ)dλ : Intensity of incident X-rays µ (λ) : Mass absorption coefficient of the specimen for X-rays of wavelength λ λ iqs : Wavelength of iqs line ρ : Specimen density w i : Mass fraction of element i in the specimen τ i(λ) : Photo-absorption coefficient of element i for X-rays of wavelength λ K ip : Fraction of shell p in photo-absorption coefficient; K ip = (1 1/J ip ) / Π J i J ip : Jump ratio at edge p of element i λ<λ iq<λ ip λ ip : Wavelength at edge p of element i ω iq : Fluorescent yield of shell q of element i R s iq : Relative transition probability of iqs line in iq series Ψ in : Incident angle Ψ out : Take-off angle : Total number of holes in q shell generated after relaxation of a hole in p shell n i,p->q Figure 1. The intensity formula for the term of the cascade effect Details of the intensity calculation of the secondary photoelectron excitation term are given elsewhere 2. EXPERIMENTS Two experiments were performed to evaluate the calculation. One of them, using tunable radiation, was carried out in the radiometry laboratory of PTB at the third generation 1.7 GeV electron storage ring BESSY II in Berlin 5. Beside other beamlines intended for radiometric tasks, a plane-grating monochromator (PGM) beamline for undulator radiation and a four-crystal monochromator (FCM) beamline for bending magnet radiation provide monochromatized radiation of high spectral purity. The photon energies available at the PGM range from 30 ev to 1.9 kev and at the FCM from 1.75 kev to 10 kev. Within the present investigation, requiring photon energies between 300 ev and 8000 ev, the 1200 l/mm Au coated grating at the PGM and the Si(111) crystals at the FCM were employed. At a given photon energy of interest, the radiant power of the incident excitation radiation was adapted to the count-rate capability of the Si(Li) detector used by either varying the trigonometric ratio of the angle of incidence to the angle of

Copyright (c)jcpds-international Centre for Diffraction Data 2002, Advances in X-ray Analysis, Volume 45. 513 diffraction at the PGM or by detuning the second pair of Si crystals at the FCM. The set of experiments was carried out in the ultrahigh vacuum XRF irradiation chamber of PTB placed in the focal plane of the PGM and of the FCM beamlines. This chamber allows simultaneous handling and accurate positioning of six samples with an effective diameter of 10 mm that are oriented vertically. The angle at which the exciting radiation is incident on the sample of interest can be varied between 30 and 90. In this work, both angles of incidence and take-off were set to 45. The scattered and fluorescence radiation were registered by an energy-dispersive Si(Li) detector with a 0.2 µm thick Si window placed behind an calibrated aperture, which is 67 mm away from the sample center. In addition, the efficiency of such a detector was determined in absolute terms with a relative uncertainty ranging from 1.5 % to 2 % at the photon energies of interest. The schematic configuration is shown in figure 2. The specimen used for this experiment was a 2 µm thick chromium layer deposited on a silicon wafer. The spectral region of interest was that of Cr-L fluorescent radiation. The other experiment was performed using a sequential fluorescent X-ray spectrometer Rigaku ZSX 100e equipped with a Rh end-window tube, the window thickness being 30 µm. The measurements were carried out in two excitation conditions of 30 kv with no primary filter, and 50 kv with a 25 µm thick aluminum filter to see the contribution of the cascade effect. The specimens for these measurements were a nickel metal, steel and Ni-alloy standard samples from Brammer and a film standard sample from Micromatter. The compositions of these specimens are listed in table 1. The measured fluorescence line was Ni-Lα. Table 1. List of the specimens used in the experiment with the spectrometer with their standard content values (trace elements have been omitted). Deposition Content (mass%) Specimen mass (µg/cm 2 ) Ni Co Fe Mn Cr Ti Cu Mo W Al Si Ni metal 100 BNRM5179 34.1 41.34 0.87 22.20 0.46 0.26 0.30 0.38 BNRM825 43.1 0.065 28.65 0.36 21.85 0.71 1.92 2.82 0.08 0.23 BNRM198 53.7 10.59 1.47 0.02 19.17 3.19 0.0026 9.96 0.13 1.50 0.07 BNRM199 56.9 13.53 1.27 0030 19.28 3.04 0.022 4.17 0.06 1.38 0.06 BNRM172 23.6 1.63 0.92 22.27 0.02 0.36 13.91 0.48 Nickel on mylar film 43.7 100 45 Sample Primary X-rays 45 Si window (0.2 µm thick) Si(Li) Collimator Figure 2. Schematic view of the XRF experimental setup in the PTB laboratory at BESSY II RESULT AND DISCUSSION Figure 3 presents the comparison between measured and calculated Cr-L fluorescent intensities. The experimental results obtained by use of monochromatic radiation and three types of calculated results are shown. The three calculations cover (i) the result obtained by primary and secondary fluorescent X-rays only, (ii) by primary and secondary fluorescent X-rays and

Copyright (c)jcpds-international Centre for Diffraction Data 2002, Advances in X-ray Analysis, Volume 45. 514 secondary photoelectron excitation, (iii) the result consisting of primary and secondary fluorescent X-rays, secondary photoelectron excitation and the cascade effect. This figure shows Cr-L intensities in log scale against incident photon energy. The experimental data show a drastic jump at the Cr-K edge energy. This jump illustrates the cascade effect very well. Calculations (i) and (ii) show no jump at the Cr-K edge, although calculation (ii) is in line with the experiment below the edge, illustrating the contribution of the secondary photoelectron excitation. In contrast to this, the calculation (iii) reproduces the jump at the Cr-K edge. Part of the remaining difference between the measured data and the calculation above the Cr-K edge would be due to the Coster-Kronig transition, which still must be included into the calculation. 10-8 Measurement Calculation: without photoelectron excitation, without cascade effect with photoelectron excitation, without cascade effect with photoelectron excitation, with cascade effect 10-8 Measured Cr-L intensity 10-9 10-9 Calculated Cr-L intensity NB: parameters for the ionization crosssection of Bethe: b=0.209, c=1.053 10-10 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 Incident photon energy / ev Figure 3. Experimental and calculated results for Cr-L fluorescence intensities from the 2 µm thick chromium layer deposited on a silicon wafer using monochromatized radiation at the PTB lab at BESSY II. Dots: experimental results. Dotted line: the calculated results obtained by primary and secondary fluorescent X-rays only. Dashed line: the calculated results, which consist of primary and secondary fluorescent X-rays and the secondary photoelectron excitation. Solid line: the results obtained by calculation, which includes primary and secondary fluorescent X-rays, secondary photoelectron excitation and the cascade effect. Figure 4 presents the comparison between measured and calculated intensities of Ni-Lα. The experimental results obtained by use of the spectrometer with the excitation voltage of 30 kv compared with two types of calculation results are shown. Graphs (a) and (b) are identical data sets, but data values in (b) have been normalized by the Ni-Lα intensity for the nickel metal specimen. These two calculations are (i) the result obtained by primary and secondary fluorescent X-rays only, (ii) the results, which include primary and secondary fluorescent X-rays, secondary photoelectron excitation and the cascade effect. The difference between (i) and (ii) is very small, meaning that the contribution of the cascade and photoelectron excitation effects to

Copyright (c)jcpds-international Centre for Diffraction Data 2002, Advances in X-ray Analysis, Volume 45. 515 Ni-Lα emission is only slight in this excitation condition. This is due to the tube spectrum. In this excitation condition using a tube equipped with an ultra-thin-window, Rh-L lines, which cannot contribute to the cascade effect, are very intense in comparison with the Rh-K lines (see table 2). 70 Excitation voltage: 30kV, primary filter: none 0.45 0.40 Measured intensity 60 50 40 30 20 10 (a) 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Calculated intensity Normalized measured intensity 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 (b) 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 Normalized calculated intensity Figure 4. Experimental and calculated results for Ni-Lα fluorescence intensities from the 7 different specimens listed in table 1, using a sequential spectrometer equipped with a Rh endwindow tube, with a 30 µm thick Be window. The measurements were carried out under the excitation conditions of 30 kv without any primary filter. Squares: the calculation results obtained by primary and secondary fluorescent X-rays only. Circles: the results obtained by calculation, which covers primary and secondary fluorescent X-rays, secondary photoelectron excitation and the cascade effect. Table 2. Characteristic X-ray intensities from a Rh end-window tube with a 30 µm thick Be window in two conditions. [A]: excitation voltage: 30 kv, Primary filter: none; [B]: excitation voltage: 50 kv, primary filter: 25 µm thick Al. Intensity Line name Rh-Kα Rh-Kβ Rh-Lα Rh-Lβ1 Rh-Lβ2 Rh-Lβ3 Rh-Lγ1 Wavelength[Å] 0.61470 0.54559 4.5982 4.3741 4.1310 4.2665 3.9437 Condition[A] 900.05 185.82 20309 9676.9 1142.2 1891.2 431.40 Condition[B] 9066.5 1894.5 26.195 31.298 9.1068 9.3340 5.0133 To enhance the cascade effect and to evaluate the calculation, we performed another measurement with an excitation voltage of 50 kv using a 25 µm thick aluminum primary filter. The result is shown in figure 5 in the same manner as figure 4. Figure 5(a) illustrates that the contribution of the cascade effect is large in the calculation due to the enhanced Rh-K lines and suppressed Rh-L lines. Furthermore, in figure 5(b), the normalized intensity plot, the new calculation gives all data points on a single line not only for bulk samples but also for the thin

Copyright (c)jcpds-international Centre for Diffraction Data 2002, Advances in X-ray Analysis, Volume 45. 516 film specimen. However, when using the conventional calculation, the data point of the thin film specimen does not lie on the line connecting the data points of bulk samples. 5.0 Excitation voltage: 50kV, primary filter: 25µm thick Al 0.35 Measured intensity 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 (a) 0.0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 Calculated intensity Normalized measured intensity 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 (b) 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 Normalized calculated intensity Figure 5. Experimental and calculated results for Ni-Lα fluorescence intensities from the specimens listed in table 1 using a sequential spectrometer equipped with a Rh end-window tube having a 30 µm thick Be window. The measurements were carried out with the excitation conditions of 50 kv with a 25 µm thick aluminum filter. Squares: the calculation results obtained by primary and secondary fluorescent X-rays only. Circles: the results obtained by the calculation, which covers primary and secondary fluorescent X-rays, secondary photoelectron excitation and the cascade effect. CONCLUSION The implementation of the cascade effect into the intensity calculation has been described. The cascade effect as well as the secondary photoelectron excitation effect was observed in two different experimental situations. The calculation was validated by experiments using both monochromatized radiation and a WDXRF spectrometer. In the experiment using the WDXRF spectrometer with an ultra-thin window tube in usual excitation condition, the contribution of the cascade effect was only slight. REFERENCES [1] M. Mantler, Adv. X-ray Anal. 36 (1994) 27 [2] Y. Kataoka et al, Adv. X-ray Anal. 41 (1998) 76 [3] W. Bambynek et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 44 (1972) 716 [4] P. V. Rao et al. Phys.Rev. A5 (1972) 997 [5] B. Beckhoff et al., Nucl. Instrum Meth. A 444 (2000) 480