MATLAB/SIMULINK Programs for Flutter

Similar documents
FREQUENCY DOMAIN FLUTTER ANALYSIS OF AIRCRAFT WING IN SUBSONIC FLOW

A method for identification of non-linear multi-degree-of-freedom systems

Introduction to Signal Analysis Parts I and II

Aeroelasticity. Lecture 7: Practical Aircraft Aeroelasticity. G. Dimitriadis. AERO0032-1, Aeroelasticity and Experimental Aerodynamics, Lecture 7

Dynamic Response of an Aircraft to Atmospheric Turbulence Cissy Thomas Civil Engineering Dept, M.G university

ME 563 HOMEWORK # 5 SOLUTIONS Fall 2010

Closed-form Method to Evaluate Bike Braking Performance

Aeroelastic Gust Response

Aeroelasticity. Lecture 4: Flight Flutter Testing. G. Dimitriadis. AERO0032-1, Aeroelasticity and Experimental Aerodynamics, Lecture 4

Improvement of flight regarding safety and comfort

Aerodynamic Resonance in Transonic Airfoil Flow. J. Nitzsche, R. H. M. Giepman. Institute of Aeroelasticity, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Göttingen

CHAPTER 6 STATE SPACE: FREQUENCY RESPONSE, TIME DOMAIN

AE 714 Aeroelastic Effects in Structures Term Project (Revised Version 20/05/2009) Flutter Analysis of a Tapered Wing Using Assumed Modes Method

Research Article Numerical Study of Flutter of a Two-Dimensional Aeroelastic System

German Aerospace Center (DLR)

Bridge deck with two stationary wings (see item 8.2); Bridge deck with two control surfaces.(see item 8.3).

FLUID STRUCTURE INTERACTIONS PREAMBLE. There are two types of vibrations: resonance and instability.

A beam reduction method for wing aeroelastic design optimisation with detailed stress constraints

Laboratory 11 Control Systems Laboratory ECE3557. State Feedback Controller for Position Control of a Flexible Joint

Aeroelasticity. Lecture 9: Supersonic Aeroelasticity. G. Dimitriadis. AERO0032-1, Aeroelasticity and Experimental Aerodynamics, Lecture 9

Improved System Identification for Aeroservoelastic Predictions

Phonon dispersion relation and density of states of a simple cubic lattice

Nonlinear Aeroelastic Analysis of a Wing with Control Surface Freeplay

MAE 143B - Homework 7

Stability and Control

Velocity estimates from sampled position data

Simulation of Aeroelastic System with Aerodynamic Nonlinearity

On the use of control surface excitation in utter testing

Wind Tunnel Experiments of Stall Flutter with Structural Nonlinearity

Structural Nonlinear Flutter Characteristics Analysis for an Actuator-fin System with Dynamic Stiffness

Matthew Lucas Guertin, 2d Lt USAF

The Application of Nonlinear Pre-Filters to Prevent Aeroservoelastic Interactions Due to Actuator Rate Limiting

CHAPTER 12 TIME DOMAIN: MODAL STATE SPACE FORM

FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESSON SOUND AND VIBRATION DECEMBER15-18, 1997 ADELAIDE,SOUTHAUSTRALIA

DYNAMIC STALL ONSET VARIATION WITH REDUCED FREQUENCY FOR THREE STALL MECHANISMS

A pragmatic approach to including complex natural modes of vibration in aeroelastic analysis

ROBUST AEROELASTIC ANALYSIS IN THE LAPLACE DOMAIN: THE µ-p METHOD

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No

INFLUENCE OF VIBRATION MODES ON FLUTTER ANALYSIS FOR LONG-SPAN SUSPENSION BRIDGES

1942. Effects of motion-induced aerodynamic force on the performance of active buffeting control

Wind Effects on the Forth Replacement Crossing

Lab 3: Poles, Zeros, and Time/Frequency Domain Response

System Simulation using Matlab

DOING PHYSICS WITH MATLAB FOURIER ANALYSIS FOURIER TRANSFORMS

NON-LINEAR BEHAVIOUR OF A WING DUE TO UNDERWING STORES

Experimental Aerodynamics. Experimental Aerodynamics

Aeroelasticity in Dynamically Pitching Wind Turbine Airfoils

4-7. Elementary aeroelasticity

Strain-Based Analysis for Geometrically Nonlinear Beams: A Modal Approach

Aero-Propulsive-Elastic Modeling Using OpenVSP

A Singular Perturbation Approach in Nonlinear Aeroelasticity for Limit-Cycle Oscillations

Linearized Equations of Motion!

High accuracy numerical and signal processing approaches to extract flutter derivatives

EE 355 / GP 265 Homework 5 Solutions

Flight Dynamics, Simulation, and Control

Some effects of large blade deflections on aeroelastic stability

Aeroelastic Wind Tunnel Testing of Very Flexible High-Aspect-Ratio Wings

The future of non-linear modelling of aeroelastic gust interaction

Nonlinear buffeting response of bridge deck using the Band Superposition approach: comparison between rheological models and convolution integrals.

( ) (where v = pr ) v V

Digital Signal Processing: Signal Transforms

PROGRESS IN THE PREDICTION OF AEROSERVOELASTIC INSTABILITIES ON LARGE CIVIL TRANSPORT AIRCRAFT

Some tools and methods for determination of dynamics of hydraulic systems

Alternative Expressions for the Velocity Vector Velocity restricted to the vertical plane. Longitudinal Equations of Motion

Flutter analysis of a composite light trainer aircraft

FLUTTER PREDICTION OF A SWEPT BACK PLATE USING EXPERIMENTAL MODAL PARAMETERS

Advanced Laser Technologies Homework #2

Aeroelastic Analysis of Engine Nacelle Strake Considering Geometric Nonlinear Behavior

DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF AN AIRPLANE ELASTIC STRUCTURE IN TRANSONIC FLOW

ECE 6390 Homework 2: Look Angles

e jωt = cos(ωt) + jsin(ωt),

Nonlinear Aeroelasticity of a Very Flexible Blended-Wing-Body Aircraft

Transonic Flutter Prediction of Supersonic Jet Trainer with Various External Store Configurations

Designing Active Control Laws in a Computational Aeroelasticity Environment. Jerry R. Newsom. Doctor of Philosophy in Mechanical Engineering

Numerical Analysis of Active Cascade Flutter Control with Smart Structure

ADAPTIVE FEEDFORWARD CONTROL DESIGN FOR GUST LOADS ALLEVIATION AND LCO SUPPRESSION

Module No. # 01 Lecture No. # 22

Worst-case Simulation With the GTM Design Model

Modal Filtering for Control of Flexible Aircraft

CONTROL LAW DESIGN IN A COMPUTATIONAL AEROELASTICITY ENVIRONMENT

The Application of Nonlinear Pre-Filters to Prevent Aeroservoelastic Interactions due to Actuator Rate Limiting

Flight Dynamics and Control. Lecture 3: Longitudinal stability Derivatives G. Dimitriadis University of Liege

CDS 101/110: Lecture 3.1 Linear Systems

Mechanical Systems Part A: State-Space Systems Lecture AL12

R. Balan. Splaiul Independentei 313, Bucharest, ROMANIA D. Aur

Laboratory 1. Solving differential equations with nonzero initial conditions

Combined Local Global Variability and Uncertainty in the Aeroservoelasticity of Composite Aircraft

Towards Reduced Order Modeling (ROM) for Gust Simulations

Homework Set #7 - Solutions

Limit Cycle Oscillations of a Typical Airfoil in Transonic Flow

Control Systems! Copyright 2017 by Robert Stengel. All rights reserved. For educational use only.

Modelling the Dynamics of Flight Control Surfaces Under Actuation Compliances and Losses

EE 4314 Lab 1 Handout Control Systems Simulation with MATLAB and SIMULINK Spring Lab Information

AN ENHANCED CORRECTION FACTOR TECHNIQUE FOR AERODYNAMIC INFLUENCE COEFFICIENT METHODS

AEROELASTIC SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION USING TRANSONIC CFD DATA FOR A 3D WING

A Blade Element Approach to Modeling Aerodynamic Flight of an Insect-scale Robot

Daniela C. Rebolho Eduardo M. Belo Senior Member, ABCM Flávio D. Marques Senior Member, ABCM

Numerical Study on Performance of Innovative Wind Turbine Blade for Load Reduction

Maneuver Load Controls, Analysis and Design for Flexible Aircraft

Grandstand Terraces. Experimental and Computational Modal Analysis. John N Karadelis

Transcription:

H MATLAB/SIMULINK Programs for Flutter In this appix, some sample MATLAB programs are given for the calculation of the aeroelastic behaviour of a binary aeroelastic system, its response to control surface and gust/turbulence inputs, and also the addition of a simple PID control loop to reduce the gust response. H.1 DYNAMIC AEROELASTIC CALCULATIONS In Chapter 11 the characteristics of the flutter phenomenon were described using a binary aeroelastic system. The following code sets up the system equations, including structural damping if required, and then solves the eigenvalue problem for a range of speeds and plots the Vω and Vg trs. % Pgm_H1_Calcs % Sets up the aeroelastic matrices for binary aeroelastic model, % performs eigenvalue solution at desired speeds and determines the frequencies % and damping ratios % plots V_omega and V_g trs % Initialize variables clear; clf % System parameters s = 7.5; % semi span c = 2; % chord m = 100; % unit mass / area of wing kappa_freq = 5; % flapping freq in Hz theta_freq = 10; % pitch freq in Hz xcm = 0.5*c; % position of centre of mass from nose xf = 0.48*c; % position of flexural axis from nose e = xf/c - 0.25; % eccentricity between flexural axis and aero centre (1/4 chord) velstart = 1; vel = 180; velinc =0.1; % lowest velocity % maximum velocity % velocity increment Introduction to Aircraft Aeroelasticity and Loads C 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd J. R. Wright and J. E. Cooper 1

2 MATLAB/SIMULINK PROGRAMS FOR FLUTTER a = 2*pi; % 2D lift curve slope rho = 1.225; % air density Mthetadot = -1.2; % unsteady aero damping term M = (m*c^2-2*m*c*xcm)/(2*xcm); % leading edge mass term damping_y_n = 1; % =1 if damping included =0 if not included if damping_y_n == 1 % structural proportional damping inclusion C = alpha * M + beta * K % then two freqs and damps must be defined % set dampings to zero for no structural damping z1 = 0.0; % critical damping at first frequency z2 = 0.0; % critical damping at second frequency w1 = 2*2*pi; % first frequency w2 = 14*2*pi; % second frequency alpha = 2*w1*w2*(-z2*w1 + z1*w2)/ (w1*w1*w2*w2); beta = 2*(z2*w2-z1*w1) / (w2*w2 - w1*w1); % Set up system matrices % Inertia matrix a11=(m*s^3*c)/3 + M*s^3/3; % I kappa a22= m*s*(c^3/3 - c*c*xf + xf*xf*c) + M*(xf^2*s); % I theta a12 = m*s*s/2*(c*c/2 - c*xf) - M*xf*s^2/2; %I kappa theta a21 = a12; A=[a11,a12;a21,a22]; % Structural stiffness matrix k1 = (kappa_freq*pi*2)^2*a11; % k kappa heave stiffness k2 = (theta_freq*pi*2)^2*a22; % k theta pitch stiffness E = [k1 0; 0 k2]; icount = 0; for V = velstart:velinc:vel % loop for different velocities icount = icount +1; if damping_y_n == 0; % damping matrices C = [0,0; 0,0]; % =0 if damping not included else % =1 if damping included C = rho*v*[c*s^3*a/6,0;-c^2*s^2*e*a/4,-c^3*s*mthetadot/8] + alpha*a + beta*e; % Aero and structural damping K = (rho*v^2*[0,c*s^2*a/4; 0,-c^2*s*e*a/2])+[k1,0; 0,k2]; % aero / structural stiffness Mat = [[0,0; 0,0],eye(2); -A\K,-A\C]; lambda = eig(mat); % set up 1st order eigenvalue solution matrix % eigenvalue solution % Natural frequencies and damping ratios

AEROSERVOELASTIC SYSTEM 3 for jj = 1:4 im(jj) = imag(lambda(jj)); re(jj) = real(lambda(jj)); freq(jj,icount) = sqrt(re(jj)^2+im(jj)^2); damp(jj,icount) = -100*re(jj)/freq(jj,icount); freq(jj,icount) = freq(jj,icount)/(2*pi); % convert frequency to hertz Vel(icount) = V; % Plot frequencies and dampings vs speed figure(1) subplot(2,1,1); plot(vel,freq,'k'); vaxis = axis; xlim = ([0 vaxis(2)]); xlabel ('Air Speed (m/s) '); ylabel ('Freq (Hz)'); grid subplot(2,1,2); plot(vel,damp,'k') xlim = ([0 vaxis(2)]); axis([xlim ylim]); xlabel ('Air Speed (m/s) '); ylabel ('Damping Ratio (%)'); grid H.2 AEROSERVOELASTIC SYSTEM In Chapter 12 the inclusion of a closed loop control system was introduced via the addition of a control surface to the binary flutter model. The following code enables the response of the binary aeroelastic system subject to control surface excitation and also a vertical gust sequence to be calculated through the use of the SIMULINK function Binary Sim Gust Control shown in Figure H1. The control surface input is defined as a chirp with start and frequencies needing to be specified, and the gust input contains both 1-cosine and random turbulence inputs. Note that the random signal is generated by specifying an amplitude variation and random phase in the frequency domain via the inverse Fourier transform. All simulations are in the time domain. Note that the feedback loop is not included here but it would be a straightforward addition to the code. % Chapter B05 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% % Binary Aeroelastic System plus control plus turbulence %% % Define control_amp, turb_amp, gust_amp_1_minus_cos to %% % determine which inputs are included %% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% clear all; close all % System parameters V = 100; s = 7.5; % Airspeed % semi span

4 MATLAB/SIMULINK PROGRAMS FOR FLUTTER Egust From Workspace K*uvec MFG 1 s EoutG2 Velocities 1 s EoutG1 Integrator Integrator1 Displacements Econtrol From Workspace1 K*uvec MFC K*u inv(m)c K*u inv(m)k Figure H.1 SIMULINK Implementation for the open loop aeroservoelastic system. c = 2; % chord a1 = 2*pi; % lift curve slope rho = 1.225; % air density m = 100; % unit mass / area of wing kappa_freq = 5; % flapping freq in Hz theta_freq = 10; % pitch freq in Hz xcm = 0.5*c; % position of centre of mass from nose xf = 0.48*c; % position of flexural axis from nose Mthetadot = -1.2; % unsteady aero damping term e = xf/c - 0.25; % eccentricity between flexural axis and aero centre damping_y_n = 1; % =1 if damping included =0 if not included % Set up system matrices a11 = (m*s^3*c)/3 ; % I kappa a22 = m*s*(c^3/3 - c*c*xf + xf*xf*c); % I theta a12 = m*s*s/2*(c*c/2 - c*xf); % I kappa theta a21 = a12; k1 = (kappa_freq*pi*2)^2*a11; % k kappa k2 = (theta_freq*pi*2)^2*a22; % k theta A = [a11,a12; a21,a22]; E = [k1 0; 0 k2]; if damping_y_n == 0; % =0 if damping not included C = [0,0; 0,0]; else C = rho*v*[c*s^3*a1/6,0; -c^2*s^2*e*a1/4,-c^3*s*mthetadot/8]; K = (rho*v^2*[0,c*s^2*a1/4; 0,-c^2*s*e*a1/2])+[k1,0;0,k2] ; % Gust vector F_gust = rho*v*c*s*[s/4 c/2]'; % Control surface vector EE = 0.1; % fraction of chord made up by control surface

AEROSERVOELASTIC SYSTEM 5 ac = a1/pi*(acos(1-2*ee) + 2*sqrt(EE*(1-EE))); bc = -a1/pi*(1-ee)*sqrt(ee*(1-ee)); F_control = rho*v^2*c*s*[-s*ac/4 c*bc/2]'; % Set up system matrices for SIMULINK MC = inv(a)*c; MK = inv(a)*k; MFG = inv(a)*f_gust; MFC = inv(a)*f_control; dt = 0.001; tmin = 0; tmax = 10; t = [0:dt:tmax]'; % sampling time % start time % time % Column vector of time instances %%%%%% CONTROL SURFACE INPUT SIGNAL - SWEEP SIGNAL %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% control_amp = 5; % magnitude of control surface sweep input in degrees control_amp = control_amp * pi / 180; % radians burst =.333; % fraction of time length that is chirp signal 0-1 sweep_start = 1; % chirp start freq in Hertz sweep_ = 20; % chirp freq in Hertz t_ = tmax * burst; Scontrol = zeros(size(t)); % control input xt = sum(t < t_); for ii = 1:xt Scontrol(ii) = control_amp*sin(2*pi*(sweep_start + (sweep_ - sweep_start)*ii/(2*xt))*t(ii)); %%%%%%%%%%% GUST INPUT TERMS - "1-cosine" and/or turbulence %%% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Sgust = zeros(size(t)); %%% 1 - Cosine gust gust_amp_1_minus_cos = 0; % max velocity of "1 - cosine" gust (m/s) gust_t = 0.05; % fraction of total time length that is gust 0-1 g_ = tmax * gust_t; gt = sum(t < g_); for ii = 1:gt Sgust(ii) = gust_amp_1_minus_cos/2 * (1 - cos(2*pi*t(ii)/g_)); %%% Turbulence input - uniform random amplitude between 0 Hz and

6 MATLAB/SIMULINK PROGRAMS FOR FLUTTER turb_max_freq Hz %%% turb_amp = 0; % max vertical velocity of turbulence (m/s) turb_t = 1; % fraction of total time length that is turbulence 0-1 t_ = tmax * turb_t; turb_t = sum(t < t_); % number of turbulence time points required turb_max_freq = 20; % max frequency of turbulence(hz) - uniform freq magnitude npts = max(size(t)); if rem(max(npts),2) = 0 % code set up for even number npts = npts - 1; nd2 = npts / 2; nd2p1 = npts/2 + 1; df = 1/(npts*dt); fpts = fix(turb_max_freq / df) + 1; % number of freq points that form turbulence input for ii = 1:fpts % define real and imag parts of freq domain % magnitude of unity and random phase a(ii) = 2 * rand - 1; % real part - 1 < a < 1 b(ii) = sqrt(1 - a(ii)*a(ii)) * (2*round(rand) - 1); % imag part % Determine complex frequency representation with correct frequency characteristics tf = (a + j*b); tf(fpts+1 : nd2p1) = 0; tf(nd2p1+1 : npts) = conj(tf(nd2:-1:2)); Sturb = turb_amp * real(ifft(tf)); for ii = 1:npts Sgust(ii) = Sgust(ii) + Sturb(ii); % "1 - cosine" plus turbulence inputs % Simulate the system using SIMULINK Egust = [t,sgust]; % Gust Array composed of time and data columns Econtrol = [t,scontrol]; % Control Array composed of time and data columns [tout] = sim('binary_sim_gust_control'); x1 = EoutG1(:,1)*180/pi; % kappa - flapping motion x2 = EoutG1(:,2)*180/pi; % theta - pitching motion x1dot = EoutG2(:,1)*180/pi; x2dot = EoutG2(:,2)*180/pi; figure(1); plot(t,scontrol,t,sgust)

AEROSERVOELASTIC SYSTEM 7 xlabel('time (s)'); ylabel('control Surface Angle(deg) and Gust Velocity(m/s)') figure(2) ; plot(t,x1,'r',t,x2,'b') xlabel('time (s)'); ylabel('flap and Pitch Angles (deg/s)') figure(3); plot(t,x1dot,'r',t,x2dot,'b') xlabel('time (s)'); ylabel('flap and Pitch Rates (deg/s)')

8