Time-of-Flight Mass Analyzers

Similar documents
Chemistry Instrumental Analysis Lecture 35. Chem 4631

CEE 772 Lecture #27 12/10/2014. CEE 772: Instrumental Methods in Environmental Analysis

CEE 772: Instrumental Methods in Environmental Analysis

Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics - Lecture 2 - Matthias Trost Newcastle University

1. The range of frequencies that a measurement is sensitive to is called the frequency

MASS SPECTROMETRY. Topics

(Refer Slide Time 00:09) (Refer Slide Time 00:13)

CHAPTER D3 TOF ION OPTICS

MS Goals and Applications. MS Goals and Applications

CHAPTER D4 ORTHOGONAL TIME OF FLIGHT OPTICS

MS Goals and Applications. MS Goals and Applications

Mass Spectrometry. What is Mass Spectrometry?

GRADUATE COURSE IN MASS SPECTROMETRY: LECTURE 2

Mass Analyzers. mass measurement accuracy/reproducibility. % of ions allowed through the analyzer. Highest m/z that can be analyzed

Harris: Quantitative Chemical Analysis, Eight Edition

MASS ANALYSER. Mass analysers - separate the ions according to their mass-to-charge ratio. sample. Vacuum pumps

Lecture 8: Mass Spectrometry

Lecture 8: Mass Spectrometry

Mass Analyzers. Principles of the three most common types magnetic sector, quadrupole and time of flight - will be discussed herein.

Chemistry 311: Topic 3 - Mass Spectrometry

Types of Analyzers: Quadrupole: mass filter -part1

Instrumental Analysis. Mass Spectrometry. Lecturer:! Somsak Sirichai

Fundamentals of Mass Spectrometry. Fundamentals of Mass Spectrometry. Learning Objective. Proteomics

Mass Analyzers. Ion Trap, FTICR, Orbitrap. CU- Boulder CHEM 5181: Mass Spectrometry & Chromatography. Prof. Jose-Luis Jimenez

Mass Spectroscopy. Base peak. Molecular Ion peak. The positively charged fragments produced are separated, based on their mass/charge (m/z) ratio. M+.

Screening of pesticides residues by the time of flight analyzer (ToF) : Myth or reality?

Molecular Mass Spectrometry

Molecular weight of polymers. Molecular weight of polymers. Molecular weight of polymers. Molecular weight of polymers. H i

MS/MS .LQGVRI0606([SHULPHQWV

Analysis of Polar Metabolites using Mass Spectrometry

ICPMS Doherty Lecture 1

LECTURE-13. Peptide Mass Fingerprinting HANDOUT. Mass spectrometry is an indispensable tool for qualitative and quantitative analysis of

Time of Flight Mass Spectroscopy and Velocity Map Imaging

Mass Spectrometry. Hyphenated Techniques GC-MS LC-MS and MS-MS

Interface (backside) & Extraction Lens

Quadrupole Time-of-Flight Liquid Chromatograph Mass Spectrometer LCMS-9030 C146-E365

Collision Cross Section: Ideal elastic hard sphere collision:

A Simple Multi-Turn Time of Flight Mass Spectrometer MULTUM II

Mass spectrometry.

1. Prepare the MALDI sample plate by spotting an angiotensin standard and the test sample(s).

TANDEM MASS SPECTROSCOPY

LECTURE-11. Hybrid MS Configurations HANDOUT. As discussed in our previous lecture, mass spectrometry is by far the most versatile

Chemistry Instrumental Analysis Lecture 34. Chem 4631

422 Brazilian Journal of Physics, vol. 29, no. 3, September, An Introduction to the Time-of-Flight Technique. Per Hakansson

Introduction to LC-MS

1) Introduction. 2) Types of Mass Analyzers - Overview. Assigned Reading: Nier mass spectrometry paper Extra Reading:

Theory English (Official)

PhysicsAndMathsTutor.com 1

Introduction to GC/MS

Laser Dissociation of Protonated PAHs

Macromolecular Chemistry

Translational Biomarker Core

Week 5: Fourier Tranform-based Mass Analyzers: FT-ICR and Orbitrap

Mass Spectrometry in MCAL

[ instrument specifications ]

Mass spectrometry gas phase transfer and instrumentation

Lecture 9. PMTs and Laser Noise. Lecture 9. Photon Counting. Photomultiplier Tubes (PMTs) Laser Phase Noise. Relative Intensity

Chem 550, Spring, 2012 Part I: OVERVIEW OF MASS SPECTROMETRY:

Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry of Ions Generated by Molecules in Intense Laser Fields

Factors Affecting Mass Measurement Accuracy in a TOF Mass Spectrometer. Curtis D. Cleven, James Little, Eastman Chemical Company, Kingsport, TN

Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometry (FT-ICR-MS)

Lecture 9: Introduction to QM: Review and Examples

LC-MS Based Metabolomics

Solutions for Exercise session I

Large Plasma Device (LAPD)

Lecture 22 Ion Beam Techniques

Mass Analysers for LC MS

Mass Spectrometry. Fundamental LC-MS. Mass Analysers

Particle physics experiments

Mass Spectrometry (MS)

Fall Quarter 2010 UCSB Physics 225A & UCSD Physics 214 Homework 1

Joint Institute for Nuclear Research. Flerov Laboratory of Nuclear Reactions. University Center LABORATORY WORK

Abstract... I. Acknowledgements... III. Table of Content... V. List of Tables... VIII. List of Figures... IX

Experiment 2 Deflection of Electrons

(Total for Question = 5 marks) PhysicsAndMathsTutor.com

Chapter-4 Stimulated emission devices LASERS

in Electronic Devices and Circuits

Mass Spectrometry. Electron Ionization and Chemical Ionization

MALDI-TOF: a powerful tool for the analysis of biomolecules and large organic molecules

Ch. 22 Mass Spectrometry (MS)

Homework 2: Forces on Charged Particles

Radioactivity APPARATUS INTRODUCTION PROCEDURE

KE = 1 2 mv2 = ev. (1)

Lecture 11: Doppler wind lidar

Mechanism of Insulin Emission in Matrix Assisted Laser Ionization

pickup from external sources unwanted feedback RF interference from system or elsewhere, power supply fluctuations ground currents

v = E B FXA 2008 UNIT G485 Module Magnetic Fields BQv = EQ THE MASS SPECTROMETER

Secondary Ion Mass Spectroscopy (SIMS)

Magnetic fields applied to laser-generated plasma to enhance the ion yield acceleration

Mass Spectrometry. A truly interdisciplinary and versatile analytical method

Differential Cross Section Measurements in Ion-molecule Collisions

Thermo Scientific LTQ Orbitrap Velos Hybrid FT Mass Spectrometer

Chapter 4 Scintillation Detectors

Mass spectrometry of proteins, peptides and other analytes: principles and principal methods. Matt Renfrow January 11, 2008

RANGE OF ALPHAS. Advanced Laboratory, Physics 407 University of Wisconsin Madison, Wisconsin 53706

M M e M M H M M H. Ion Sources

Automatic Control Systems. -Lecture Note 15-

VIII. QUADRUPOLE ION TRAPS: AN ION TRAPPING INST. A. BASIC DESIGN (REF: JMS, 1997, 32, 351)

Extrel Application Note

Chapter 10: Wave Properties of Particles

Transcription:

Time-of-Flight Mass Analyzers Jonathan Karty C613 lecture 1 March 6, 8 (Section 4. in Gross, pages 115-18)

TOF Overview Time-of-flight (TOF) is the least complex mass analyzer in terms of its theory Ions are given a defined kinetic energy and allowed to drift through a field-free region (.5 to several meters) The time ions arrive at the detector is measured and related to the m/z ratio

TOF Concept A packet of stationary ions is accelerated to a defined kinetic energy and the time required to move through a fixed distance is measured First TOF design published in 1946 by W.E. Stephens Detector

TOF advantages Theoretically unlimited mass range Ions are not trapped (quad, IT, FTICR) nor are their flight paths curved (BE sectors) Detection efficiencies induce practical limits of a few hundred kda (M+H)+ Instrument is not scanning (it is dispersive) Analysis is very rapid (4+ khz acquisition possible) Wide range of m/z s can be measured with good sensitivity Moderate to high resolving powers (5,-,+) Moderate cost ($1k to $5k) Relatively high duty cycle Couples extremely well with pulsed ion sources (e.g. MALDI)

TOF Disadvantages Requires high vacuum (<1-6 torr) Coupling to continuous ion sources (e.g. ESI or EI) not straight forward Requires complex and high speed electronics High acceleration voltages (5-3 kv) Fast detectors (ns or faster) GHz sampling digital conversion Large volumes of data can be generated quickly Limited dynamic range Often 1 or 1 3 at most High resolution instruments can get rather large

From Physics 1: (1) KE = ½mv From Physics : () KE = z*u = ½mv All ions accelerated by the same voltage, U From Physics 1: (3) ΔX= v TOF + ½aTOF * U * z ( 4) v = m 1, Th ion @ 19 kv, v 6 km/sec X m ( 6) TOFflight _ tube = * * U z (5) TOF = ΔX/v Time-of-Flight Theory ΔX same for all ions = D (flight tube length) No acceleration in flight tube TOF α U -1 α (m/z) ½

Mass Scale Calibration TOF α (m/z) 1/ or m/z α TOF Mass scale is calibrated measuring flight times known m/z ions and fitting them to a polynomial equation (7) TOF = a*(m/z) 1/ + b also Higher order calibrations are often used 5 th order on some commercial instruments Form can be (7a) m/z = A*TOF + B*TOF + C

Resolution in TOF MS ( 8) z * U = * m* v * z * U ( 1) v t D (9) m = * z * U v m * z * U ( t D = D / t m = * 11) = *t * z * U 1) m = *t * t D ( ( * z * U ) * t m t (13) = D = m (* z * U ) *t * dt t D Easy way to improve resolution is to increase flight tube length (assuming excellent vacuum)

Real-world TOF MS Previous examples all assumed ions formed at rest, at the same time, and all at the same position in the source In reality, ions are formed throughout the source at various times, in various locations, with a range of initial kinetic energies Practical TOF instrument design relies on minimizing the contributions of each of these realities

Influence of Initial Position In EI, CI, and ESI sources, ions are NOT formed all in the exact same position These differences in initial position have profound effects on the mass spectrum Ions spend some time in the source prior to crusing through the flight tube (14) TOF obs = TOF source + TOF flight_tube A more complete treatment of the TOF requires that we consider how the ions get accelerated

A brief discussion of acceleration Ions are usually accelerated by using parallel plates at different potentials to create electric fields Ions in an electric field gain energy according to the equation: (15) KE = z*(e*s) or U = z*(e*s) z is charge, E is electric field strength in V/m, and s is distance the ion travels in the field (Lorentz force equation) Time of flight in the source must be computed with a differential equation

Initial Position Math * U * z ( 4) v = m ( 15)U = E * s (17) v s = * z * E * s m = s t (16) s = * z * E * s m t (19) s * z * E * s = m t (18) t m = * z * E 1 * 1/ s s (1) t s t = s * m z * E s 1/ s +1 V V () t s = m * z * E *s m m () t s = * s (3) t d = * D * z * E * s * z * E * s (14) TOF m = t + td = (4) * * z * E * s ( s D) s +

Starting Position Example Both ions are 1 m/z (1.364*1-6 kg/c) Red ion is 6 mm from V plate, blue ion is 5 mm from V plate s for red is.6 m; s for blue is.5 m Distance between plates is 1 cm Electric field is 1, V/m Detector is 1 m from nd grid (4) TOF m = t + td = * * z * E * s TOF red = 94 usec TOF blue = 11 usec E red = 6 ev, E blue = 5 ev ( s D) s + Detector +1 V V This effect tends to cause peaks to tail to longer TOF

Initial Kinetic Energy Spread If the ion has a non-zero kinetic energy along the axis of the flight tube prior to acceleration: (5) KE total = z*u+u (U is initial KE) At 5 K, kt =.43 ev Kinetic energies perpendicular to this axis can cause the ions to miss the detector entirely The initial kinetic energy spread and initial position can be accounted for mathematically m* v 6) ( = U + z * E * s ( 7) v = *( U ) + z * E * s m

How long do ions spend in the source? 7) v s = *( U + z * E * s) m ( = s t 8) s = *( U + z * E * s) * t m ( (9) t s t = s m * ( U + s z * E * s ) ( m) [( ) ] U * z * E * s ± U ( 3) t s = * + t z * E (initial KE and position) (initial direction) (uncertainty of ion formation)

Putting this all together ( m) [( ) ] U * z * E * s ± U ( 3) t s = * + t z * E (31) t D * + ( m) * D ( U z * E * s) = D ( m) (14) TOF = t s + t [( ) ] ( ) m * D U * z * E * s ± U + * ( U + z * E * s) ( 3) TOF = * + t z * E Source design is used to minimize the variables that contribute to peak broadening High U to minimize U Narrow ion formation regions to minimize s Pulsing ions out of source to minimize t

TOF designs to maximize resolving power High acceleration voltages can reduce impact of initial KE distribution Initial position effects are harder to minimize Additional ion optical elements can be introduced to compensate for these two effects Set flight tube axis perpendicular to major vector of KE distribution orthogonal extraction

Time-lag focusing There is a point in the flight tube where ions starting at different positions arrive simultaneously m m ( 33) ts = t D (34) * s = * D (35) D = s Adding a third grid allows the analyst to move this focus plane to the detector +1 V +9 V ( * z * E * s) ( * z * E * s) 1955, Wiley and McLaren 1994, Colby, King, and Reilly @ IU (special case for MALDI) s is related to initial KE since all ions formed simultaneously Detector V +1 V

Reflectrons? In 1966, B. Mamyrin patented an ion mirror device for energy focusing and resolution improvement A reflectron is a long series of electrodes that create an electric field to reverse the direction the ions travel Higher energy ions spend more time in reflectron than lower energy ions By adjusting parameters, ions with same m/z but slightly different KE s can be made to arrive at a detector simultaneously

Reflectron drawing +11 V V V +1 V Detector m 36) TOF = * 1 4 * z * E ( ( D + D + ) D ref m 37) TOF = * 1 4 *( z * E + U ) ( z * E + U (38) D = * z * E ref D ref ( D + D + ) D ref

Reflectron Pros and Cons Advantages Focuses kinetic energies Better resolution Allows one to use same flight tube twice Remember, res power increases with D Cons Only a narrow range of KE can be focused Usually 85%-15% of E Metastable ions are not focused by reflectron If ion fragments in flight tube, products have same velocity as precursors (but KE is proportional to mass of product) Reflectron focuses by energy

Measuring TOF Signals Oscilloscope (aka multi-channel scaler) Analog recorder (ion current vs. time) Great for intense signals Generates large data files (all times recorded) Noise recorded as well as signal Time to Digital Converter Records only when an event occurred Threshold is set so an event is arrival of 1 ion Excellent for low signals (single ion counting) Does NOT take into account intensity ions arriving simultaneously counts as 1 event Limited dynamic range

Factors that Influence Resolution Laser pulse width in MALDI Detector response profile Digitization rate and amplifier bandwidths Kinetic energy distribution of ions Initial position of ions in source Power supply stability Response profiles of pulsing electronics

Waters LCT Drawing Mass range: 6-, m/z Resolving power: ~5, 54 psec resolution TDC ESI or APCI source MS recorded at ~ khz Table-top MS (1.5x1x1 m) Cost ~$,