THE HISTORY AND PERFORMANCE OF VERTICAL WELL SOLUTION MINING OF NAHCOLITE (NaHCO 3 ) IN THE PICEANCE BASIN, NORTHWESTERN COLORADO, USA

Similar documents
SOLUTION MINING OF NAHCOLITE AT THE AMERICAN SODA PROJECT, PICEANCE CREEK, COLORADO. M. Hardy Agapito Assocs., Inc. Grand Junction, CO

New Mexico Geological Society

GIS-based Water Resource Geospatial Infrastructure for Oil Shale Development

Addendum to November 2009 Vantage EA

Basin-wide Evaluation of the Uppermost Green River Formation s s Oil-Shale Resource, Uinta Basin, Utah and Colorado

RED METAL IN NEW POTASH INITIATIVE

Deposition and Diagenesis of Basin-Center Evaporites, Green River Formation

Western Kentucky CO 2 Storage Test

Dawsonite breakdown reactions during pyrolysis in Green River Formation oil shale

Water use estimate 2014 National Oil Shale Association March 2014 Background New information

FURTHER EXPANSION OF GOLD DISCOVERY AT COLUMBUS PROJECT REPORTED BY IRELAND INC.

Groundwater. (x 1000 km 3 /y) Reservoirs. Oceans Cover >70% of Surface. Groundwater and the. Hydrologic Cycle

AMERICAN POTASH LITHIUM BRINE PROJECT: Paradox Basin, UT and CO. May 26, 2017 CSE: AMP

Groundwater. (x 1000 km 3 /y) Oceans Cover >70% of Surface. Groundwater and the. Hydrologic Cycle

Utah s s Oil Shale Deposits: Stratigraphy and Resource Evaluation

REPORT OF INVESTIGATION NO. 37 UTAH GEOLOGICAL AND MINERALOGICAL SURVEY

Colorado s Underground Injection Control Program: Prevention and Mitigation of Induced Seismicity

Origin and Evolution of Formation Waters in the West-Central Part of the Alberta Basin

OIL AND GAS PLAYS OF THE MICHIGAN BASIN, SOUTHERN ONTARIO. Terry Carter, Consulting Geologist London, Ontario

THE BENEFICIATION OF OIL SHALE BY THE. Gale Peters Gale Peters and Associates Broadway (DRC) School Sodium Lease located on the

Novel Application in Determining Oil Shale Porosity Using a Borehole Gravimeter

Pros and Cons against Reasonable Development of Unconventional Energy Resources

Evaluating Geological Formations and Managing Ground-Water Resources: Can We Afford the Effort?

The Impacts of Carbon Dioxide Storage in the Saline Arbuckle Aquifer on Water Quality in Freshwater Aquifers in Kansas

Pershing Gold Extends High-Grade Mineralization through Step-Out Drilling in Phase 1 and Initiates Phase 2 Drilling Program

ENGINEER S CERTIFICATION OF FAULT AREA DEMONSTRATION (40 CFR )

MARKET UPDATE ON URANIUM AND GOLD PROJECTS

1978 MSc Geology, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Introduction to Groundwater Vistas (Groundwater Modeling) Albuquerque, New Mexico

NetRA Resources Assessment (NetRA) 1

Soils, Hydrogeology, and Aquifer Properties. Philip B. Bedient 2006 Rice University

Memorabilia of the Uranium Boom of the 1950 s*

Interpretation and application of hydrogeological concepts to commercial scale brine extraction projects

An Assessment of Geological Carbon Sequestration in the Illinois Basin: The Illinois Basin-Decatur Site

UNIQUE MINERALOGY OF OIL SHALE FROM THE PICEANCE BASIN, COLORADO

Lotsberg Salt Formation Solution-mined Cavern for SAGD Solid Waste disposal, Cold Lake, Alberta.

Carbonates vs Clastics How the Differences Impact our SAGD Assessments. Caralyn Bennett, P. Eng. July 6, 2011

GM 1.4. SEG/Houston 2005 Annual Meeting 639

KANSAS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open File Report LAND SUBSIDENCE KIOWA COUNTY, KANSAS. May 2, 2007

Solution Processes and. Karst Topography

WESTCARB Phase I Results Review

The Shale Spectrum: Interdisciplinary understanding across oil shale, oil-bearing shale and gas shale plays

The Eocene Gir Formation of the Ghani and Ed Dib Fields, Eastern Libya - an example of "Virtual Core Study"

Atlantic Rim Coalbed Methane Play: The Newest SuccessfulCBM Play in the Rockies

Dielectric Properties of Oil Shale

Astonishing to Waste. Flaring is less common now but still continues LNG Tankers (liquified natural gas, -160 C; 1/600 volume Easy transport

Fracturing Some Myths about Oil Shale. Dr. Jeremy Boak, Director Center for Oil Shale Technology and Research Colorado School of Mines June 19, 2012

EXPLORATION NEWS RELEASE MAGISTRAL DISTRICT: MORE GROWTH, MORE GOLD, MORE SILVER

Regulatory Considerations for Evaluating the Potential for Induced Seismicity of a Class I Non-Hazardous Disposal Well

COGCC Underground Injection Program & Induced Seismicity

Steve Cumella 1. Search and Discovery Article # (2009) Posted July 30, Abstract

Geothermal Systems: Geologic Origins of a Vast Energy Resource

Unraveling the Mysteries of Seismicity in Oklahoma. A Story Map

features, remote sensing analysis and a detailed interpretation of geologic and geotechnical data.

Tahoe Resources Mineral Reserves as of January 1, 2018

Seismicity and the SWD-C4A well: An ongoing UIC case study in the Denver Basin, Colorado

Climate History, Lake Evolution, and Predicting Organic Richness of the Green River Formation, Piceance Creek Basin, Colorado

1.818J/2.65J/3.564J/10.391J/11.371J/22.811J/ESD166J SUSTAINABLE ENERGY. Prof. Michael W. Golay Nuclear Engineering Dept.

Uranium in an ISR Wellfield using Kinetic-based

Needs Assessment: Permitting, i Data Management, Operations

SPE DISTINGUISHED LECTURER SERIES is funded principally through a grant of the SPE FOUNDATION

Mineral reserves and resources

URANIUM RESOURCES IN NEW MEXICO. Virginia T. McLemore New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Tech, Socorro, NM

Tim Carr - West Virginia University

Saline Minerals in the Green River Formation, Green River and Washakie Basins, Wyoming

Quarterly Report Quarter ended 30 June 2010

Green Springs Project

For personal use only

Mineral reserves and resources

Environmental Aspects of Oil Shale Development: A Review

Unconventional Natural Gas A Brief Review for Instituto Petroquimica Argentina

For personal use only

FRIO BRINE SEQUESTRATION PILOT IN THE TEXAS GULF COAST

Fracture, Fluid Flow and Diagenetic History of the Arbuckle Group

Kentucky Geological Survey Marvin Blan #1 Hancock County, Kentucky Geologic Review. J. Richard Bowersox David A. Williams Kentucky Geological Survey

For personal use only

Subsurface Geology and Resource Exploration

Grassy Mountain Project Malheur County, Oregon: A Summary

PROSPECT EVALUATION OF UNCONVENTIONAL PLAYS IN RUSSIA EPUG 2014

The Outlook on Potential Uranium ISL Mining at Nyota Deposit (Tanzania)

Foretelling a major meltdown

The Eocene Gir Formation of the Ghani and Ed Dib Fields, Eastern Libya -An example of "Virtual Core Study"*

HIGHLIGHTS. Drilling intersects wt% recovered DTR concentrate grading 69.8% Fe, including 27 metres in excess of 21% DTR.

Sodium Carbonate Resources of the Green River Formation

SL GEOLOGY AND MINING. Coal bearing strata in the project area are referable primarily to the Allegheny Group of

Mineral activities within Rich County, Utah

11/22/2010. Groundwater in Unconsolidated Deposits. Alluvial (fluvial) deposits. - consist of gravel, sand, silt and clay

Groundwater Hydrology

Oil Shale Status and Prospects Presentation to Garfield County Energy Advisory Board October 1, 2009

An Analytic Approach to Sweetspot Mapping in the Eagle Ford Unconventional Play

Unconventional Oil Plays Opportunity vs Risk

Subsidence is the sinking or collapse of a portion of the land surface. The movement involved in subsidence is essentially vertical; little or no

Application for Enhanced Oil Recovery Waterflood Project - Daly Unit No. 6

QUARTERLY ACTIVITIES REPORT

Geologic Resources. Geologic Resources and Society. Geologic Resources and Society

Lab 9: Petroleum and groundwater

Delineating and Assessing Saline Ground Water Resources

Illinois Drought Update, December 1, 2005 DROUGHT RESPONSE TASK FORCE Illinois State Water Survey, Department of Natural Resources

15 Mineral Resources (Item 19)

Contractor Name and Address: Oxy USA, Inc. (Oxy), Midland, Texas OBJECTIVES

Transcription:

Solution Mining Research Institute; Fall 2004 Technical Meeting Berlin, Germany THE HISTORY AND PERFORMANCE OF VERTICAL WELL SOLUTION MINING OF NAHCOLITE (NaHCO 3 ) IN THE PICEANCE BASIN, NORTHWESTERN COLORADO, USA Max Ramey American Soda, L.L.P., Rifle, Colorado, USA Michael Hardy Agapito Associates, Inc., Grand Junction, Colorado, USA Abstract American Soda, L.L.P. (American Soda), developed a solution mine plan for recovery of nahcolite from the vast resource in the Piceance Creek Basin using vertical wells and injection of high-temperature, pressurized water. The wellfield included 26 solution mining wells, which provided a nahcolite brine to the processing facility. The American Soda solution mining method utilizes dual, 7-inch casings cemented within a single, 19-inch borehole with 4½-inch casings being utilized as tubings within each 7-inch casing. The method injects 350 420 F water to thermo-mechanically fracture the nahcolitic oil shale and dissolve the nahcolite. A nitrogen gas cap is maintained on the top of the solution mining cavity to limit vertical growth. The solution cavities have a productive height of approximately 500 ft. During the 3.75 years of commercial operation, American Soda mined approximately 2.6 millions tons of nahcolite with the wells producing between 75,000 150,000 tons each with cavern diameters of up to 200 ft. Introduction Vertical well solution mining of nahcolite on a commercial scale was initiated by American Soda in the fall of 2000. In the fall of 2004, after nearly 4 years of struggling economics, production from the American Soda project was curtailed and the solution mining facility placed on standby. Figure 1 shows the location of the American Soda project. The American Soda project was piloted in the late 1990s with commercial production being initiated in late 2000. The solution mining process adopted for the American Soda project was pioneered by Shell Production and Exploration Company (Shell) as an outcome of an in situ oil shale experiment in the early 1970s. 1

Geological Setting Figure 1. Location of the American Soda Project The Piceance Basin is well known for its vast reserves of oil shale, as well as mineral deposits of nahcolite (NaHCO 3 ) and dawsonite [NaAl(CO 3 )(OH) 2 ]. Reserves of nahcolite within the basin have been estimated at 29 billion tons (Dyni 1974). The Piceance Basin is a broad, asymmetric, southeast-to-northwest structural and topographic basin located in northwestern Colorado, USA. The basin has an areal extent of approximately 7,225 square miles. The Parachute Creek Member of the Green River Formation contains virtually all of the oil shale, nahcolite, and dawsonite resources in the Piceance Basin. The Parachute Creek Member is generally considered to comprise three distinct zones referred to as the Mahogany, Leached, and Saline Zones. Stratigraphic analyses of the Saline Zone 2

have shown that various oil shale zones, along with nahcolite, dawsonite, and halite horizons, are laterally continuous over long distances. Figure 2 shows a north-south cross section through the American Soda Yankee Gulch Lease. Figure 2. North-South Cross Section of Yankee Gulch Lease The nahcolite mineralization occurs as disseminated nodules and thin beds within the Parachute Creek Saline Zone in the center of the basin with a mineralized thickness ranging from 200 1,000 ft. The average grade of the nahcolite mineralization ranges from 20% 24% nahcolite with dolomitic siltstones and kerogen comprising the remaining 76% 80% of the rock. The nahcolite mineralized zone is effectively impermeable. Figure 3 shows an oil shale core with large nahcolite nodules. Shell Exploration and Production Company Pilot Test From December 1970 through early 1972, Shell (Prats et al. 1977) piloted an oil shale recovery method that solution-mined nahcolite to create a rubblized oil shale that could be in situ retorted with high-pressure steam. The method was based upon the thermo- 3

Figure 3. Nahcolite Mineralization mechanical fracturing of the oil shale and the solubility of nahcolite in high-temperature water. One of the objectives of the Shell test work was to study the effect of simulated process environments on the spalling, rubbling, and disaggregating properties of the subsurface oil shale. Shell s test work was based on developing communication between the nahcolite nodules so they could be leached to establish an extensive oil shale interval of high permeability. Shell s test work focused on three mechanisms: stress release at open faces, thermally-induced stresses, and thermally-induced pressures (Prats et al. 1977). The thermal-expansion coefficient of oil shale is large because of its kerogen content and is anisotropic because of its depositional nature. Upon heating, stresses are generated within confined oil shale often in the range of 50 to 100 psi per degree Fahrenheit rise in perfectly confined samples. The thermal stresses resulting from conduction heating in massive intervals help in creating fractures, especially near lowstress faces such as are present adjacent to a leached bed or a rubble zone (Prats et al. 1977). Shell performed bench-scale tests by cementing a square-cut oil shale block, weighing approximately 200 pounds and assaying 25 27 gallons of hydrocarbons/ton cemented into a metal container. Hot water (300 520 F) was circulated through the metal container for several weeks. These tests resulted in rubblization and fractures in the oil shale block. One test resulted in a 10% elongation parallel to the bedding planes. Another resulted in the average thickness of the block increasing by 12% (Prats et al. 1977). 4

Since nahcolite and kerogen tend to decompose upon heating to yield gaseous products, fluid pressures can increase significantly within the oil shale near a heated surface. This increase in internal fluid pressure occurs whenever the rate of increase of the gas volume, at a point within the oil shale, exceeds the rate at which it can flow outward through the matrix. Since this usually occurs near a free surface, it leads to spalling (Prats et al. 1977). This mechanism, sometimes referred to as the popcorn effect, is particularly effective with isolated nodules, since nahcolite tends to decompose at relatively low temperatures (Papadopolous and Ueber 1972). Shell operated the solution mining (leach) phase of the project for 44 days. During this time, 121,000 pounds of nahcolite was solution mined (Prats et al. 1977). Shell initiated steam injection for the in situ retort of oil shale in March 1971. The in situ retort test continued through December 1971. Shell produced at total of 420 bbls of oil during the in situ retort test (Prats et al. 1977). Shell was successful in the solution mining of nahcolite but encountered difficulty with the in situ retort of the oil shale. American Soda, L.L.P., Project Building on Shell s method, American Alkali, Inc., of Glenwood Springs, Colorado, and the Williams Companies of Tulsa, Oklahoma, formed a joined venture, American Soda, to construct a pilot solution mining facility and test the feasibility of solution mining nahcolite using high-temperature water in the fall of 1996. Early studies included resource confirmation drilling, thermo-mechanical testing of the nahcolite core, and baseline hydrological and groundwater quality studies. The thermomechanical studies confirmed the reduction of strength of the nahcolite core at elevated temperatures and thermally-induced stresses resulting from the high-thermal expansion coefficient were sufficient to fracture the nahcolitic oil shale. The American Soda pilot plant began operations in June 1997. By May 1998, results were encouraging enough to begin feasibility engineering of a full-scale sodium bicarbonate and sodium carbonate production facility. In late summer of 1998, American Soda commissioned Kvaerner Metals to initiate the detailed design of a sodium carbonate and sodium bicarbonate production facility. Agapito Associates, Inc. (AAI), was commissioned to provide engineering support for the development of the commercial wellfield design and solution mining permitting efforts. These detailed design studies, complimented by the pilot testing results, formed the basis for the commercial decisions, the commercial mine plan for the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) [Steigers 1998], and Environmental Impact Statement (EIS0 [BLM 1999]. Detailed descriptions of the American Soda Project are contained in these documents: Yankee Gulch Sodium Minerals Project Commercial Mine Plan, the EIS prepared for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and in a Mining Engineering article by M. P. Hardy, C. Yates, and K. Nielsen (Hardy et al. 2003). 5

The final engineering design was comprised of two facilities connected by 44 miles of dual, 12-inch insulated pipelines to produce 800,000 tons of sodium carbonate and 150,000 tons of sodium bicarbonate annually. The Piceance facility, located at the sodium minerals lease site, 22 miles south-southwest of Meeker, Colorado, consists of the wellfield and upper processing plant. Figure 4 shows the processing facility, the injection water pipeline to the wellfield, and the production solution pipeline from the wellfield. The upper processing facility converts the sodium bicarbonate solution to sodium carbonate solution, produces liquid CO 2, concentrates the sodium carbonate solution through evaporation, and pumps the sodium carbonate Figure 4. Upper Processing Facility solution to the Parachute, Colorado, facility. The sodium bicarbonate to sodium carbonate conversion process liberates CO 2 gas, which is utilized for the production of liquid CO 2. The ratio of production during the conversion process is one short ton of sodium bicarbonate equal to 0.63 short tons of sodium carbonate. United States patent number 6,609,761 (Ramey et al. 2000) fully describes the process. The sodium bicarbonate to sodium carbonate conversion process is necessary due the temperature-solubility curve of sodium bicarbonate. A concentrated solution of sodium bicarbonate cannot hold sodium bicarbonate in solution as temperature losses are experienced in the 44-mile pipeline. Conversely, a concentrated solution of sodium carbonate can easily hold sodium carbonate in solution as temperature losses in the pipeline are experienced. The Parachute facility (Figure 5), located 3 miles north of Parachute, Colorado, provides water for the solution mining operation, produces sodium carbonate by evaporation, and sodium bicarbonate by contacting a sodium carbonate solution with CO 2 to precipitate sodium bicarbonate. All administrative, sales, and shipping functions were performed from the Parachute facility. Figure 5. Parachute Facility 6

The American Soda solution mining method utilizes dual, 7-inch casings cemented within a single, 19-inch borehole with a 4½-inch tubing within each 7-inch casing. The method utilizes 350 420 F water to thermo-mechanically fracture the nahcolitic oil shale and dissolve the nahcolite into solution. A nitrogen gas cap is maintained on the top of the solution mining cavity to limit vertical growth. A minimum of a 150-ft crown pillar between the roof of each cavity and the dissolution surface is maintained to isolate the cavity from the overlying aquifers. The solution mining wells range in depth, between 2,200 and 2,600 ft, with the solution cavities having an average productive height of approximately 500 525 ft. At start-up of the commercial operation, 26 solution mining wells were drilled and completed to provide nahcolite brine to the upper processing facility. The wells were spaced 600 ft apart with a single roll of wells placed on a 300-ft spacing. Future drilling was planned to fill in between the 600-ft spacing to recover approximately 40% of the nahcolite resource. Figure 6 shows a three-dimensional (3D) schematic of the wellfield and solution-mined caverns. Figure 6. 3D Schematic of Wellfields and Solution-Mined Caverns Each well was instrumented with measurements for temperature, pressure, flow for the injection fluid, the production fluid, and the nitrogen for the gas cap. The instrumentation connects to a centralized distributed control system (DCS). Each well was automated so that injection fluid flow and nitrogen gas flow could be controlled by the DCS. The data from the DSC was saved into a data historian database to provide data for production reports and performance trends. Figure 7 shows a typical American Soda wellhead and the instrumentation skid. 7

Figure 7. American Soda Wellhead and Instrumentation Skid Construction of the Parachute facility was initiated in the spring of 1999. Shutdown of the pilot plant operation and construction of the Piceance facility were initiated in January 2000. Plant and pipeline commissioning and initial production for both facilities were accomplished in November 2000. In the summer and fall of 2002, American Soda initiated the testing of solution mining of a smaller cavity height focusing on a higher grade section of nahcolite within the lower ore zone. These wells were referred to as staged-production wells. The concept was to produce the lower ore zone first, then to reposition the hot water injection position in the cavity and produce the upper ore zone. Two initial production wells were converted to staged-production wells and four wells were added as staged production wells on the second phase of drilling. In September 2003, the Williams Companies bought the American Alkali, Inc., share of the project and announced the sale of American Soda to Solvay Chemicals, a division of Solvay America. In April 2004, Solvay Chemicals announced the placement of the Piceance solution mining facility and the Parachute sodium carbonate production facility on standby due to high natural gas prices and continued depressed prices of sodium carbonate. Solvay also announced the continued production of sodium bicarbonate at the Parachute facility utilizing sodium carbonate from Solvay Chemical s Green River, Wyoming, operation. The economics of the solution mining of nahcolite and converting the sodium bicarbonate brine to sodium carbonate brine is very sensitive to the price of energy. During feasibility studies, future natural gas prices were estimated to be $1.80 $2.00/mmbtu. In August 2004, natural gas prices in western Colorado were $5.00 $5.50/mmbtu. The solution mining cavities were on schedule to meet the designed tonnage goal of 180,000 short tons per well. The economics of production and permit limitations were the limiting factor to their size. Solution Mining Well Performance During the 3.75 years of commercial operation, American Soda mined in excess of 2.6 millions tons of nahcolite with the wells producing an average of 83,544 short tons each with an average cavity diameter of 130 ft. The average cavity diameter is the 8

diameter of a right cylinder that contains the same volume within the formation as the nahcolite produced. Table 1 lists the tons of nahcolite produced from each well through May 2004 and the average diameter of the cavities (American Soda 2004). No. Well Table 1. Well Production and Cavity Diameter NaHCO 3 Production Tons through May 2004 (tons) Average Cavity Diameter (ft) Cavern Height Drilling Phase 1 20-14 181,682 171.0 Full Initial 2 29-24 176,604 204.5 Full Initial 3 29-29 143,760 177.6 Full Initial 4 20-30 131,643 170.6 Full Initial 5 29-34 126,910 168.0 Full Initial 6 29-23 123,651 168.1 Full Initial 7 20-36 123,097 166.1 Full Initial 8 28-21 117,551 168.9 Full Initial 9 21-16 113,420 153.1 Full Initial 10 20-32 113,160 157.9 Full Initial 11 20-19 108,094 152.1 Full Initial 12 29-26 98,810 149.8 Full Initial 13 20-33 98,611 147.3 Full Initial 14 29-28 97,857 143.9 Full Initial 15 20-12 96,595 139.2 Full Initial 16 20-74 94,820 212.4 Staged Initial 17 20-31 90,615 140.2 Full Initial 18 20-35 83,024 129.0 Full Initial 19 29-27 81,775 132.3 Full Initial 20 20-2 74,075 106.8 Full Initial 21 29-20 70,039 191.0 Staged Initial 22 21-15 65,833 104.6 Full Initial 23 20-11 58,234 105.9 Full Initial 24 29-68 46,658 133.2 Staged 2002 25 29-22 29,383 84.9 Full Initial 26 28-17 18,200 66.5 Full Initial 27 28-41 12,017 52.2 Full Initial 28 20-3* 6,069 31.8 Full Pilot 29 20-76 3,818 37.0 Staged 2002 30 29-53 2,000 30.8 Staged 2002 31 29-78 1,858 31.9 Staged 2002 TOTAL 2,589,863 *20-3 was a pilot well. No commercial production resulted from 20-3. By assuming that the top ten wells operated 1,175 days of the 1,306 days available, the top ten wells averaged a production of 135,148 short tons of nahcolite, an average cavity diameter of 170.6 ft, and an average production rate of 114.8 short tons of nahcolite per day. 9

Conclusion The Shell and American Soda projects illustrate the utilization of vertical wells and thermo-mechanical fracturing to solution mine nahcolite from an impermeable oil shale rock matrix. The method is dependent upon the physical characteristics of the matrix rock and contained minerals. The energy required for the mining and processing requires a low and stable cost of energy. References American Soda, L.L.P. (2004), American Soda Cavity Characterization of Well 28-21, American Soda Piceance Creek Mine, June 23, 2004, prepared for Paul Dagget (BLM), Paul Osbourne/Dan Jackson (U.S. EPA), and Erica Crosby (CO Dept. of Natural Resources), June 23. Bureau of Land Management (1999), Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Yankee Gulch Sodium Minerals Project, American Soda, L.L.P., January. Dyni, J.R. (1974), Stratigraphy and Nahcolite Resources of the Saline Faces of the Green River Formation in Northwest Colorado, Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists Guidebook, pp. 111 122. Hardy M.P., M. Ramey, C. Yates, and K. Nielsen (2003), Solution Mining of Nahcolite at the American Soda Yankee Gulch Project, Mining Engineering, Vol. 55, No. 10, October. Prats, M., P.J. Closmann, A.T. Arisen, and D. Drinkard (1977), Soluble-Salt Processes for In-Situ Recovery of Hydrocarbons from Oil Shale, Journal of Petroleum Technology, pp. 1078 1088. Papadopolous, M.P. and R.C. Ueber (1972), Method of Producing Oil from an Oil Shale Formation Containing Nahcolite and Dawsonite, U.S. Patent No. 3,700,280, October 24. Ramey, M.E., J.S. McEwan, K.L. Green, C.L. Yates, A.L. Turner, M.A. Rockendal, I.P. Nielsen, M.P. Hardy, and R.R. Goodrich (2000), U.S. Patent 6,609,761, Sodium Carbonate and Sodium Bicarbonate Production from Nahcolitic Oil Shale. Steigers Corporation (1998), Commercial Mine Plan, Yankee Gulch Sodium Minerals Project, prepared for American Soda, L.L.P., August. 10