Supplementary Materials for

Similar documents
Chapter 4 Evaluating a potential interaction between deltex and git in Drosophila: genetic interaction, gene overexpression and cell biology assays.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Midterm 1. Average score: 74.4 Median score: 77

Segment boundary formation in Drosophila embryos

Axis Specification in Drosophila

Unicellular: Cells change function in response to a temporal plan, such as the cell cycle.

Axis Specification in Drosophila

BILD7: Problem Set. 2. What did Chargaff discover and why was this important?

Nature Biotechnology: doi: /nbt Supplementary Figure 1. Overexpression of YFP::GPR-1 in the germline.

Axis Specification in Drosophila

Solutions to Problem Set 4

Reading: Chapter 5, pp ; Reference chapter D, pp Problem set F

Genetics 275 Notes Week 7

MCB 141 Midterm I Feb. 14, 2012

Supplementary Figure 1. Nature Genetics: doi: /ng.3848


allosteric cis-acting DNA element coding strand dominant constitutive mutation coordinate regulation of genes denatured

Supplementary Figure 1. Phenotype of the HI strain.

BIS &003 Answers to Assigned Problems May 23, Week /18.6 How would you distinguish between an enhancer and a promoter?

Why Flies? stages of embryogenesis. The Fly in History

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Extranuclear Inheritance

Control of Gene Expression

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

7.06 Problem Set #4, Spring 2005

Homeotic genes in flies. Sem 9.3.B.6 Animal Science

Drosophila Life Cycle

Constructing a Pedigree

GFP GAL bp 3964 bp

Lecture 7. Development of the Fruit Fly Drosophila

downstream (0.8 kb) homologous sequences to the genomic locus of DIC. A DIC mutant strain (ro- 6

MCB 141 Midterm I Feb. 19, 2009

Bypass and interaction suppressors; pathway analysis

998 Biophysical Journal Volume 107 August

Supporting Information

Diaphanous regulates myosin and adherens junctions to control cell contractility and protrusive behavior during morphogenesis

Axis determination in flies. Sem 9.3.B.5 Animal Science

AP Biology Gene Regulation and Development Review

CHROMOSOMAL BASIS OF INHERITANCE

2. Der Dissertation zugrunde liegende Publikationen und Manuskripte. 2.1 Fine scale mapping in the sex locus region of the honey bee (Apis mellifera)

Supplementary Figure 1: Mechanism of Lbx2 action on the Wnt/ -catenin signalling pathway. (a) The Wnt/ -catenin signalling pathway and its

Supplementary Materials for

Chapter 18 Regulation of Gene Expression

Chapter 11. Development: Differentiation and Determination

Time allowed: 2 hours Answer ALL questions in Section A, ALL PARTS of the question in Section B and ONE question from Section C.

Supplementary Materials for

Developmental genetics: finding the genes that regulate development

Nature Neuroscience: doi: /nn.2662

Biology 218, practise Exam 2, 2011

Requirements for integrins during Drosophila development

Question Set # 4 Answer Key 7.22 Nov. 2002

Caenorhabditis elegans

Full file at CHAPTER 2 Genetics

Fig. S1. Proliferation and cell cycle exit are affected by the med mutation. (A,B) M-phase nuclei are visualized by a-ph3 labeling in wild-type (A)

Development of Drosophila

Supplementary Information

EXPRESSION OF THE FIS2 PROMOTER IN ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA

Developmental Biology Lecture Outlines

Biological Roles of Cytokinins

The phenotype of this worm is wild type. When both genes are mutant: The phenotype of this worm is double mutant Dpy and Unc phenotype.

Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) Today s Nobel Prize in Chemistry

Mechanical Signals Trigger Myosin II Redistribution and Mesoderm Invagination in. Drosophila Embryos

MOLECULAR CONTROL OF EMBRYONIC PATTERN FORMATION

targets. clustering show that different complex pathway

CHAPTER 13 PROKARYOTE GENES: E. COLI LAC OPERON

GENETICS 603 Exam 3, Dec 2, 2011

Genetic characterization of the Drosophila homologue of coronin

- interactions between alleles. - multiple phenotypic effects of one gene. - phenotypic variability in single genes. - interactions between genes

Two Frizzled Planar Cell Polarity Signals in the Drosophila Wing Are Differentially Organized by the Fat/Dachsous Pathway

Chapter 18 Lecture. Concepts of Genetics. Tenth Edition. Developmental Genetics

Mesoderm Induction CBT, 2018 Hand-out CBT March 2018

Objectives. Announcements. Comparison of mitosis and meiosis

Wan-Ju Liu 1,2, John S Reece-Hoyes 3, Albertha JM Walhout 3 and David M Eisenmann 1*

Supplementary Materials for

Supplemental Information. Inferring Cell-State Transition. Dynamics from Lineage Trees. and Endpoint Single-Cell Measurements

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Characterization of anillin mutants reveals essential roles in septin localization and plasma membrane integrity

Chromosome Chr Duplica Duplic t a ion Pixley

Meiosis and Fertilization Understanding How Genes Are Inherited 1

Chapter 3. Results rho-1 regulates epidermal elongation in C. elegans embryogenesis

Chapter 2: Extensions to Mendel: Complexities in Relating Genotype to Phenotype.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Guided Reading Chapter 1: The Science of Heredity

DRhoGEF2 regulates actin organization and contractility in the Drosophila blastoderm embryo.

DNA Structure and Function

Autonomous concentration-dependent activation and repression of Krüppel by hunchback in the Drosophila embryo

Two distinct mechanisms for differential positioning of gene expression borders involving the Drosophila gap protein giant

When one gene is wild type and the other mutant:

Roles of the Homothorax/Meis/Prep homolog UNC-62 and the Exd/Pbx homologs CEH-20 and CEH-40 in C. elegans embryogenesis

Illegitimate translation causes unexpected gene expression from on-target out-of-frame alleles

Tandem repeat 16,225 20,284. 0kb 5kb 10kb 15kb 20kb 25kb 30kb 35kb

Objective 3.01 (DNA, RNA and Protein Synthesis)

The Chromosomal Basis of Inheritance

The Midline Protein Regulates Axon Guidance by Blocking the Reiteration of Neuroblast Rows within the Drosophila Ventral Nerve Cord

Attractive and repulsive functions of Slit are mediated by different receptors in the Drosophila trachea

Tissue- and stage-specific control of homeotic and segmentation gene expression in Drosophila embryos by the polyhomeotic gene

Nature Neuroscience: doi: /nn.2717

University of Massachusetts Medical School Wan-Ju Liu University of Maryland

Transcription:

www.sciencesignaling.org/cgi/content/full/6/301/ra98/dc1 Supplementary Materials for Regulation of Epithelial Morphogenesis by the G Protein Coupled Receptor Mist and Its Ligand Fog Alyssa J. Manning, Kimberly A. Peters, Mark Peifer,* Stephen L. Rogers* *Corresponding author. E-mail: srogers@bio.unc.edu (S.L.R.); peifer@unc.edu (M.P.) Published 12 November 2013, Sci. Signal. 6, ra98 (2013) DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.2004427 The PDF file includes: Text S1. Description of the mist YO17 excision allele. Fig. S1. mist RNAi reduces Mist protein abundance in S2R+ cells, and Mist is not detectable in S2 cells. Fig. S2. mist RNA remains in mesoderm after invagination and is only modestly affected by loss of twist. Fig. S3. The mist YO17 allele expresses Mist under UAS control. Fig. S4. mist YO17 is a deletion disrupting both mist and rok. Fig. S5. Crossing schemes to examine the phenotypes of embryos expressing different patterns of mist RNA. Fig. S6. mist RNAi disrupts mesoderm invagination. Fig. S7. rok disruption does not cause the gastrulation phenotypes of mist YO17 embryos. Fig. S8. A9-GAL4 drives exogenous construct expression in a subset of wing disc cells. Table S1. List of genes targeted with dsrnas in the cell culture screen. Movie S1. S2R+ cells treated with Fog medium contract due to acto-myosin constriction. References (36, 37)

Text S1: Description of the mist YO17 excision allele We began with an EPgy2 P-element within the 5 UTR of mist, P{EPgy2}mthl1[EY16157]. This parental P-element strain does not exhibit any embryonic or other morphological or growth defects. We mobilized the P-element, seeking imprecise excisions that deleted part or all of mist, by introducing one copy of transposase into the background of the P-element. We selected for mosaic eye and/or body color in the next generation and crossed in a balancer chromosome. Balanced lines were established from single flies with altered body and/or eye color from the original line, and these were examined. We focused on one candidate that was zygotically lethal and characterized it by PCR. PCR and sequencing of mist YO17 indicated that the right end of the P-element was intact and present in its parental location. This 4.4kb stretch of P- element included a UAS (upstream activating sequence) driven promoter oriented towards mist, and 3.5kb of yellow and its flanking region. The rest of the P-element was missing. mist YO17 deleted the 92bp of the 5 UTR of mist to the left of the parental P- element, the entire promotor and upstream regulatory regions of mist, the genes encoding the small ribonucleoprotein particle protein SmG, the ribosomal protein RpS19a, the unannotated gene CG9777, and approximately 7.9kb of the rok gene. The coding sequence of mist was not disrupted. Loss of SmG is embryonic lethal but has no described alterations in morphogenesis (36). Mutation of ribosomal subunits results in the Minute phenotypes that include prolonged development, low fertility, and decreased body size (37). Consistent with our molecular analysis mist YO17 heterozygotes have a minute phenotype. rok 2 zygotic mutants are embryonic viable and die during larval development 1

(26). 2

Fig. S1. mist RNAi reduces Mist protein abundance in S2R+ cells, and Mist is not detectable in S2 cells. A. Western blot of S2R+ cell lysates for Mist, after control or mist dsrna treatment. B. Western blot for Mist in S2R+ and S2 cells. α-tubulin is used as loading control for Western blots. Western blots are representative of 3 independent experiments. 3

Fig. S2. mist RNA remains in mesoderm after invagination and is only modestly affected by loss of twist. A. mist in situ hybridization (red) in wild-type embryos shows mesodermal mist expression after ventral furrow and posterior midgut invagination. DNA is in white. B. Percentages of stage 5-8 embryos with posterior midgut only or posterior midgut and ventral furrow localization of mist RNA in wild-type, and snail, or twist mutants. C. mist in situ hybridization in embryos from twist heterozygous parents shows both ventral furrow and posterior midgut expression at blastoderm and gastrula stages. Images are representative of at least 5 embryos per developmental stage. Scale bars A, C: 100µm. vent: ventral view; lat: lateral view. 4

Fig. S3. The mist YO17 allele expresses Mist under UAS control. A-C. Mist antibody recognizes Mist in embryos, and assessment of background staining with this antibody. A. Embryo from cross between mist YO17 heterozygous female and en-gal4 homozygous male stained for Mist. The UAS-promotor in the P-element is driven by en-gal4, leading to ectopic Mist expression in the posterior compartment of each body segment. B. Left is enlarged boxed area from A, and C is a similar view of another embryo. Arrows indicate cortical Mist staining in the posterior compartment. Arrowheads indicate presumed antibody background in intervening regions. We examined >20 embryos that ectopically expressed Mist, half of which should be of the genotype mist Y017 /Y and thus have no endogenous wild-type Mist expression in the interstripes. The embryo at left is in the category with the highest inter-stripe staining, whereas that at the right has the category with the lowest interstripe staining. Because 50% of the embryos have no endogenous wild-type Mist, this suggests that our antibody has background staining as is illustrated by the punctate cytoplasmic staining in the interstripes. We thus restricted our conclusions accordingly. D. in situ hybridization for mist RNA in mist YO17 embryos carrying an engrailed-gal4 driver that expresses in the posterior compartment of each 5

segment. Images are representative of 8 embryos. Scale bar A, D: 100µm. lat: lateral view. vent: ventral view. 6

Fig. S4. mist YO17 is a deletion disrupting both mist and rok. A. Diagram of the mist genomic region containing P{EPgy2}mthl1[EY16157] within the mist 5 UTR. B. Diagram of the genomic lesion in mist YO17. Tick marks are placed 1kb apart. C. Quantification of stage 5-8 embryos with dark mist RNA staining in wild-type and mist YO17 embryos. n=number of embryos scored for each condition. D, E. Non-muscle myosin heavy chain (Zipper; Zip) staining (top), and Zip (red) and neurotactin (membrane, white) staining (middle) in embryos. Bottom panels show membrane staining only in cells within and surrounding the ventral furrow (boxed region of middle panels). D. mist YO17 /+ embryo with strong apical Zip staining and coordinated ventral furrow cell contraction. White arrows show contractile cells of the ventral furrow with similar apical area. E. mist YO17 /Y embryo with weak Zip staining and uncoordinated ventral furrow cell contraction. Green arrow shows a cell with more constricted apex and red arrow shows a 7

cell with less constricted apex than average. Images are representative of 3 embryos per genotype. Scale bar D: 100µm. vent: ventral view; lat: lateral view. 8

Fig. S5. Crossing schemes to examine the phenotypes of embryos expressing different patterns of mist RNA. Left: F2 embryos collected from this scheme are expected to have either wild-type patterned mist RNA expression or no distinguishable mist RNA expression. Right: F2 embryos collected from this scheme are expected to have ubiquitous maternal mist RNA expression. Some have mist RNA expressed from a wildtype allele as well, but this was not visible due to abundant amounts of ubiquitous RNA. Bottom: Indication of the expected embryonic mist RNA expression pattern for each genotype listed above. 9

Fig. S6. mist RNAi disrupts mesoderm invagination. A. Moesin-GFP expressing embryo injected with control dsrna has a straight ventral midline (flanked by dotted lines). B. fog hemizygous mutant with improperly internalized mesoderm (arrowheads). C. fog dsrna injected embryo has mesoderm on the exterior surface (outlined with dotted line). D. mist dsrna injected embryo with minor morphological defects in the ventral midline (arrows). E. mist-injected embryo with improper invagination of individual mesodermal cells, or F. with a large area of mesoderm on the exterior of the embryo. Cell membranes (green) are outlined with either Moesin-GFP: A, C-F, or Neurotactin: B. Mesoderm 10

(magenta) is stained for Twist. Scale bar: 100µm. G. Quantification of morphological defects in dsrna injected embryos and fog hemizygous mutants. n=number of embryos scored for each condition. vent: ventral view. 11

Fig. S7. rok disruption does not cause the gastrulation phenotypes of mist YO17 embryos. Actin (white) and Twist (red) staining in embryos. Images are representative of at least 7 embryos per developmental stage. A.-C. rok 2 /Y embryos with normal gastrulation. D.-F. mist YO17 /Y;tub-rok /+ embryos with gastrulation defects as in Fig. 3, E-J. Scale bar A: 100µm. vent: ventral view; dor: dorsal view; lat: lateral view. 12

Fig. S8. A9-GAL4 drives exogenous construct expression in a subset of wing disc cells. A.-C. mrfp expression in the same wing imaginal discs as in Fig. 5, D-H showing the A9 expression domain. Scale bar: 100µm. 13

Table S1. List of genes targeted with dsrnas in the cell culture screen. Each was targeted by at least one dsrna. mist (mthl1) is highlighted in red. 14

Movie S1. S2R+ cells treated with Fog medium contract due to acto-myosin constriction. 5secs/frame; 20 minutes elapsed time. 15