DISCRETE MATHEMATICS BA202

Similar documents
2/2/2018. CS 103 Discrete Structures. Chapter 1. Propositional Logic. Chapter 1.1. Propositional Logic

ECOM Discrete Mathematics

CS100: DISCRETE STRUCTURES. Lecture 5: Logic (Ch1)

CHAPTER 1 - LOGIC OF COMPOUND STATEMENTS

software design & management Gachon University Chulyun Kim

PROPOSITIONAL CALCULUS

Discrete Mathematical Structures. Chapter 1 The Foundation: Logic

3/29/2017. Logic. Propositions and logical operations. Main concepts: propositions truth values propositional variables logical operations

n logical not (negation) n logical or (disjunction) n logical and (conjunction) n logical exclusive or n logical implication (conditional)

Chapter 1: The Logic of Compound Statements. January 7, 2008

Intro to Logic and Proofs

Logic Overview, I. and T T T T F F F T F F F F

What is Logic? Introduction to Logic. Simple Statements. Which one is statement?

Why Learning Logic? Logic. Propositional Logic. Compound Propositions

The statement calculus and logic

CSC Discrete Math I, Spring Propositional Logic

10/5/2012. Logic? What is logic? Propositional Logic. Propositional Logic (Rosen, Chapter ) Logic is a truth-preserving system of inference

Methods of Proof. 1.6 Rules of Inference. Argument and inference 12/8/2015. CSE2023 Discrete Computational Structures

Rules Build Arguments Rules Building Arguments

Predicate Logic & Quantification

Logical Operators. Conjunction Disjunction Negation Exclusive Or Implication Biconditional

Discrete Mathematics

Rules of Inference. Arguments and Validity

Introduction to Sets and Logic (MATH 1190)

Review: Potential stumbling blocks

Chapter Summary. Propositional Logic. Predicate Logic. Proofs. The Language of Propositions (1.1) Applications (1.2) Logical Equivalences (1.

EECS 1028 M: Discrete Mathematics for Engineers

HW1 graded review form? HW2 released CSE 20 DISCRETE MATH. Fall

An Introduction to Logic 1.1 ~ 1.4 6/21/04 ~ 6/23/04

n Empty Set:, or { }, subset of all sets n Cardinality: V = {a, e, i, o, u}, so V = 5 n Subset: A B, all elements in A are in B

CS 2336 Discrete Mathematics

Discrete Structures of Computer Science Propositional Logic III Rules of Inference

1 The Foundation: Logic and Proofs

Logic and Proof. Aiichiro Nakano

Chapter 1, Part I: Propositional Logic. With Question/Answer Animations

2. The Logic of Compound Statements Summary. Aaron Tan August 2017

1 The Foundation: Logic and Proofs

MAT2345 Discrete Math

Readings: Conjecture. Theorem. Rosen Section 1.5

KS MATEMATIKA DISKRIT (DISCRETE MATHEMATICS ) RULES OF INFERENCE. Discrete Math Team

Mathacle. PSet ---- Algebra, Logic. Level Number Name: Date: I. BASICS OF PROPOSITIONAL LOGIC

Chapter 1, Logic and Proofs (3) 1.6. Rules of Inference

Mat 243 Exam 1 Review

Compound Propositions

Chapter 1 Elementary Logic

Propositional Logic Not Enough

Discrete Structures for Computer Science

A. Propositional Logic

2/18/14. What is logic? Proposi0onal Logic. Logic? Propositional Logic, Truth Tables, and Predicate Logic (Rosen, Sections 1.1, 1.2, 1.

2/13/2012. Logic: Truth Tables. CS160 Rosen Chapter 1. Logic?

Unit I LOGIC AND PROOFS. B. Thilaka Applied Mathematics

Discrete Structures for Computer Science

Logic. Logic is a discipline that studies the principles and methods used in correct reasoning. It includes:

Lecture 2. Logic Compound Statements Conditional Statements Valid & Invalid Arguments Digital Logic Circuits. Reading (Epp s textbook)

COMP 182 Algorithmic Thinking. Proofs. Luay Nakhleh Computer Science Rice University

Review. Propositions, propositional operators, truth tables. Logical Equivalences. Tautologies & contradictions

3. The Logic of Quantified Statements Summary. Aaron Tan August 2017

MATH 215 DISCRETE MATHEMATICS INSTRUCTOR: P. WENG

Propositional Logic. Spring Propositional Logic Spring / 32

Announcements CompSci 102 Discrete Math for Computer Science

Logic, Sets, and Proofs

Proofs. Example of an axiom in this system: Given two distinct points, there is exactly one line that contains them.

THE LOGIC OF COMPOUND STATEMENTS

Logic and Propositional Calculus

Sec$on Summary. Propositions Connectives. Truth Tables. Negation Conjunction Disjunction Implication; contrapositive, inverse, converse Biconditional

Math 3336: Discrete Mathematics Practice Problems for Exam I

1.1 Language and Logic

Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications

Section 1.1 Propositions

Proposition logic and argument. CISC2100, Spring 2017 X.Zhang

Where are my glasses?

Section Summary. Section 1.5 9/9/2014

Section Summary. Predicate logic Quantifiers. Negating Quantifiers. Translating English to Logic. Universal Quantifier Existential Quantifier

Discrete Mathematics. Sec

Logic. Definition [1] A logic is a formal language that comes with rules for deducing the truth of one proposition from the truth of another.

Conjunction: p q is true if both p, q are true, and false if at least one of p, q is false. The truth table for conjunction is as follows.

Math.3336: Discrete Mathematics. Nested Quantifiers/Rules of Inference

CSCI-2200 FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE

HANDOUT AND SET THEORY. Ariyadi Wijaya

Logic. Def. A Proposition is a statement that is either true or false.

1.1 Language and Logic

CSE 20 DISCRETE MATH. Winter

ICS141: Discrete Mathematics for Computer Science I

WUCT121. Discrete Mathematics. Logic. Tutorial Exercises

ICS141: Discrete Mathematics for Computer Science I

Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development Department of Teaching and Learning. Mathematical Proof and Proving (MPP)

Overview. 1. Introduction to Propositional Logic. 2. Operations on Propositions. 3. Truth Tables. 4. Translating Sentences into Logical Expressions

Section Summary. Predicate logic Quantifiers. Negating Quantifiers. Translating English to Logic. Universal Quantifier Existential Quantifier

Tools for reasoning: Logic. Ch. 1: Introduction to Propositional Logic Truth values, truth tables Boolean logic: Implications:

Logic and Proofs. (A brief summary)

Predicate Logic. Andreas Klappenecker

Computer Science 280 Spring 2002 Homework 2 Solutions by Omar Nayeem

Solutions to Exercises (Sections )

CS0441 Discrete Structures Recitation 3. Xiang Xiao

Introduction Logic Inference. Discrete Mathematics Andrei Bulatov

Solutions to Exercises (Sections )

ICS141: Discrete Mathematics for Computer Science I

A Little Deductive Logic

Outline. Rules of Inferences Discrete Mathematics I MATH/COSC 1056E. Example: Existence of Superman. Outline

Logic and Propositional Calculus

Transcription:

TOPIC 1 BASIC LOGIC This topic deals with propositional logic, logical connectives and truth tables and validity. Predicate logic, universal and existential quantification are discussed 1.1 PROPOSITION LOGIC Propositions A proposition is a declarative sentence (a sentence that declares a fact) that is either true or false, but not both. Example 1: All the following declarative sentences are propositions. i. Kuala Lumpur is the capital of Malaysia. (True) ii. Perak is the biggest state in Malaysia. (False) iii. 1 + 1 = 2 (True) iv. 2 + 2 = 3 (False) Example 2: All the following not declarative sentences are not propositions. i. What time is it? ii. Read this carefully. iii. x + 1 = 2 iv. x + y = z Letter (p, q, r, s, ) are used to denote the propositional variable. True propositional truth value is True and denoted by T. False propositional truth value is False and denoted by F. Compound Propositions The combination of one or more propositions. Are formed from existing propositions using logical operators. The types of compound propositions:- I. Negation II. Conjunction III. Disjunction inclusive or IV. Disjunction exclusive or V. Conditional statements - Converse - Contrapositive - Inverse VI. Biconditional statements Negation Let p be a proposition. The negation of p, denoted by p (also denoted by ), read as not p, is the statement It is not the case that p. Example 3: Prepared By Chiang Yoke Yen(2012) Page 1

Proposition (p) Negation of proposition ( p) Today is Friday Today is not Friday 3 + 5 7 3 + 5 = 7 3 2 3 < 2 TABLE 1: The Truth Table for the negation of a proposition:- p p T F F T Conjunction Let p and q be a proposition. The conjunction of p and q, denoted by p q, is the proposition p and q. The conjunction p q is true when both p and q are true and is false otherwise. Example 4: p : It is raining. q : It is cold. The proposition It is raining and cold. (p q) is consider as TRUE when it is raining (p is True) and it is cold (q is True). Otherwise or other situation is FALSE. In Logic the word but sometimes is used instead of and in a conjunction. For example, the statement The sun is shining, but it is raining. is another way of saying The sun is shining and it is raining. TABLE 2: The Truth Table for the conjunction of two propositions:- p q p q T T T T F F F T F F F F Disjunction inclusive or Let p and q be a proposition. The disjunction of p and q, denoted by p q, is the proposition p or q. The disjunction p q is false when both p and q are false and is true otherwise. Example 5: p : It is raining. q : It is cold. The proposition It is raining and cold. (p q) is consider as FALSE when it is not raining (p is False) and it is not cold (q is False). Otherwise or other situation is TRUE. TABLE 3: The Truth Table for the disjunction of two propositions:- p q p q T T T T F T F T T F F F Prepared By Chiang Yoke Yen(2012) Page 2

Disjunction exclusive or Let p and q be a proposition. The exclusive or of p and q, denoted by p q, is the proposition that is true when exactly one of p and q is true and is false otherwise. TABLE 4: The Truth Table for the Exclusive Or of two propositions:- p q p q T T F T F T F T T F F F Conditional statements Let p and q be a proposition. The conditional statement (or implication) p q is the proposition if p, then q. The conditional statement p q is false when p is true and q is false and true otherwise. In the conditional statement p q, p is called the hypothesis (or antecedent or premise) and q is called the conclusion (or consequence). The following common ways to express the conditional statement p q: if p, then q p implies q if p, q p only if q p is sufficient for q a sufficient condition for q is p q if p q whenever p q when p q is necessary for p a necessary condition for p is q q follows from p q unless p Example 6: p : Maria learns Discrete Mathematics. q : Maria will find a good job.. There are many ways to represent this conditional statement in English: If Maria learns Discrete Mathematics, then she will find a good job. Maria will find a good job when she learns Discrete Mathematics. A sufficient condition for Maria to find a good job is learns Discrete Mathematics. Maria will find a good job unless she does not learn Discrete Mathematics. The conditional statement If Maria learns Discrete Mathematics, then she will find a good job. (p q) is consider as FALSE when Maria learns Discrete Mathematics (p is True) but she does not get a good job (q is False). Otherwise or other situation is TRUE. TABLE 5: The Truth Table for the conditional statement p q: p q p q T T T T F F F T T F F T q p is called the converse of p q. q p is called the contrapositive of p q. p q is called the inverse of p q. Prepared By Chiang Yoke Yen(2012) Page 3

Example 7: What are the converse, the contrapositive and the inverse of the conditional statement The home team wins whenever it is raining.? Because q whenever p is one of the ways to express the conditional statement, thus p : It is raining. q : The home team wins. The converse is If the home team wins, then it is raining. The contrapositive is If the home team does not win, then it is not raining. The inverse is If it is not raining, then the home team does not win. Only the contrapositive is equivalent to the original statement. Biconditional Statements Let p and q be propositions. The biconditional statement (or bi-implications) p q is the proposition p if and only if q. The biconditional statement p q is true when p and q have the same truth values, and is false otherwise. There are some other common ways to express p q: p is necessary and sufficient for q if p then q, and conversely p iff q p q has exactly the same truth value as (p q) (q p). Example 8: p : You can take the flight. q : You buy a ticket. The statement You can take the flight if and only if you buy a ticket (p q) is consider as TRUE if p and q are either both true or both false, that is - If you buy a ticket (q is True) and you can take a flight (p is True). - If you do not buy a ticket (q is False) and you cannot take the flight (p is False). The statement You can take the flight if and only if you buy a ticket (p q) is consider as FALSE if p and q have opposite truth values, that is - When you do not buy a ticket (q is False) but you can take the flight (p is True). - When you buy a ticket (q is True) but you cannot take the flight (p is False). TABLE 6: The Truth Table for the biconditional statement p q: p q p q T T T T F F F T F F F T Prepared By Chiang Yoke Yen(2012) Page 4

Truth Tables of Compound Propositions We can construct a truth table of the compound proposition by using the precedence of logical operator: Operator Precedence 1 2 3 4 5 Example 9: Construct the truth table of the compound proposition (p q) (p q). p q q p q p q (p q) (p q) T T F T T T T F T T F F F T F F F T F F T T F F Example 10: Construct the truth table of the compound proposition (p q) ( r). p q r p q (p q) r (p q) ( r) T T T T F F F T T F T F T T T F T F T F T T F F F T T T F T T F T F T F T F F T T T F F T F T F T F F F F T T T Propositional Equivalences A tautology is the compound proposition that is always true. A contradiction is the compound proposition that is always false. A contingent statement is one that is neither a tautology nor a contradiction. Example 11: Show that p q q p is tautology. p q p q p q q p p q q p T T F F T T T T F F T F F T F T T F T T T F F T T T T T Because all the truth values are True, thus p q q p is tautology. Prepared By Chiang Yoke Yen(2012) Page 5

TUTORIAL EXERCISE 1.1 1. Which of these sentences are propositions? What are the truth values of those that are proposition? a) Malaysia is the biggest century in Asia. b) 2 + 3 = 5. c) Do not pass go. d) 5 + 7 < 10 e) 4 + x = 5. f) Polytechnic Ungku Omar is the Polytechnic Premier. 2. What is the negation of each of these propositions? a) I will go to find you later. b) There is no population in New York. c) 2 + 1 = 3. d) The summer in Taipei is hot and sunny. 3. Let p and q be the propositions p : Mei has saving ten thousand dollar in bank. q : Mei will has a trip to Hawaii. Express each of these propositions as English sentence. a) p b) p q c) p q d) p q e) p q f) p (p q) 4. Let p and q be the propositions p : It is a sunny day. q : We will go to the beach Write these propositions using p and q and logically connectives. a) It is a sunny day and we will go to the beach. b) It is a sunny day but we do not go to the beach. c) It is not a sunny day or we go to the beach. d) We will go to the beach when it is a sunny day. e) It is a sunny day if and only if we will go to the beach. 5. Determine whether each of these statements is true or false. a) 1 + 1 = 3 if and only if monkey can fly. b) 0 > 1 if and only if 2 > 1. c) 2 + 2 = 4 if and only if 1 + 1 = 2. d) If 1 + 1 = 2, then 1 is a integer number. e) If monkey can fly, then 1 + 1 = 2. f) If 1 + 1 = 2, then monkey can fly. g) If 8 5 = 2, then 5 + 2 = 8. Prepared By Chiang Yoke Yen(2012) Page 6

6. Write each of these propositions in the form if p, then q in English. a) It is necessary to wash the boss s car to get promoted. b) John gets caught whenever he cheats. c) Mary will go swimming unless the water is too cold. d) I will remember to send you the address only if you send me an e-mail message. 7. Write each of these propositions in the form p if and only if q in English. a) If you read the newspaper every day, you will be informed, and conversely. b) The trains run late on exactly those days when I take it. c) If it is hot outside you drink an ice tea, and if you drink an ice tea it is hot outside. d) For you to win the contest it is necessary and sufficient that you have the only winning ticket. 8. State the converse, contrapositive, and inverse of each of these conditional statements. a) If it raining tonight, then I will stay at home. b) I come to class whenever there is going to be a quiz. 9. Construct a truth table for each of these compound propositions and determine whether these compound propositions are a tautology. a) (p q) ( q p) b) (p q) (p q) c) (p q) ( p r) d) (p q) p e) [(p q) (q r)] (p r) Prepared By Chiang Yoke Yen(2012) Page 7

1.2 RULES OF INFERENCE Valid Arguments in Propositional Logic An argument is a sequence of propositions which contains premises and a conclusion. P 1 P 2 Premises (Hypotheses) P 3... Conclusion Consider the following argument involving propositions: If you have the password, then you can log onto the network. You have the password. Therefore, You can log onto the network. The argument has the form p q p We would like to determine whether this is a valid argument. An argument is valid when all its premises are true implies that the conclusion is true. We can always use a truth table to show that an argument form is valid. Example 12: Is the argument above is valid? Premises Conclusion p q p q p q T T T T T T F F T F F T T F T F F T F F Thus, that argument is valid. Example 13: So, is this argument a valid argument? p q q Premises Conclusion p q p q q p T T T T T T F F F T F T T T F F F T F F This is not a valid argument because the premises are true but the conclusion is false. Another way, the argument form with premises P 1, P 2,, P n and conclusion q is valid when (P 1 P 2 P n ) q is a tautology. Prepared By Chiang Yoke Yen(2012) Page 8

Example 14: show that the argument below is valid with using tautology. p (q r) r The argument is valid when (p (q r)) ( r) (p q) is a tautology. p q r q r p (q r) r (p (q r)) ( r) p q (p (q r)) ( r) (p q) T T T T T F F T T T T F T T T T T T T F T T T F F T T T F F F T T T T T F T T T T F F T T F T F T T T T T T F F T T T F F F T F F F F F T F F T It is a tautology. Therefore, the argument is valid. Rules of Inference for Propositional Logic Rules of inference are the validity of some relatively simple argument forms which do not have to resort to truth table. Table of the rules of inference: Rules of Tautology Name Example 15 Inference p q p p q q p q q r p r p q p q p p q [(p q) p] q [(p q) q] p [(p q) (q r)] (p r) [(p q) p] q Modus Ponens Modus Tollens Hypothetical Syllogism Disjunctive Syllogism If it is a raining day, then I will stay at home. It is a raining day. Therefore, I will stay at home. If it is a raining day, then I will stay at home. I will not stay at home. Thus, it is not a raining day. If it is a raining day, then I will stay at home. If I stay at home, then I will cook dinner for you. Therefore, if it is a raining day, then I will cook dinner for you. It is either a raining day or I will stay at home. It is not a raining day. Therefore, I will stay at home. p (p q) Addition It is a raining day. Therefore, it is either a raining day or I will stay at home. Let p : It is a raining day. q : I will stay at home. r : I will cook dinner for you. Prepared By Chiang Yoke Yen(2012) Page 9

Using Rules of Inference to Build Valid Argument When there are many premises, several rules of inference are often needed to show that an argument is valid. There are two steps to build valid argument by using rules of inference:- First step: - List out all the premises and the conclusion which denoted by letter such as p, q, r, s, t, and so on and build the valid argument Second step: - Show that the hypotheses lead to conclusion by using the rules of inference and state what kind of rules are using. Example 16: Show that the hypothesis If you send me an e-mail message, then I will finish writing the report, If you do not send me an e-mail message, then I will go to sleep early, and If I go to sleep early, then I will wake up early lead to the conclusion If I do not finish writing the report, then I will wake up early. Step 1: Let p : You send me an e-mail message. q : I will finish writing the report. r : I will go to sleep early. s : I will wake up early. So, the premises are p q, p r, r s and the conclusion is q s. The argument form is p q p r r s q s Step 2: Steps Reasons 1) p q Hypothesis / Premise 2) q p Use step (1) and Contrapositive 3) p r Hypothesis / Premise 4) q r Use step (2), (3), and Hypothetical Syllogism 5) r s Hypothesis / Premise 6) q s Use step (4), (5), and Hypothetical Syllogism This argument form shows that the hypotheses lead to the desired conclusion. TUTORIAL EXERCISE 1.2 Prepared By Chiang Yoke Yen(2012) Page 10

1. What rules of inference is used in each of these arguments? a) Linda is a Mathematics major. Therefore, Linda is either a Mathematics major or a Information Technology major. b) John is either likes reading or drawing. John dislikes reading. Therefore, John likes drawing. c) If tomorrow is a sunny day, then we will go swimming. Tomorrow is a sunny day. Therefore, we will go swimming. d) If I go swimming, then I will not go shopping. If I do not go shopping, then you help me buy the New Times magazine. Therefore, if I go swimming, then you help me buy the New Times magazine. e) If I finish the report today, then I will send the report for you tomorrow. I do not send the report for you tomorrow. Therefore I do not finish the report today. 2. Explain the rules of inference used to show that the hypotheses lead to the desired conclusion. a) Cindy works hard. If Cindy works hard, then she is a hardworking girl. If Cindy is a hardworking girl, then she will get the job. Therefore, Cindy will get the job. b) I am either lucky or clever. I am not lucky. If I am clever, then I will get a good result in SPM. I will get a good result in SPM. c) If Mary has free times, then she will go shopping. Mary buys a new skirt if she goes shopping. Mary does not buy a new skirt. Therefore, Mary does not have free times. 1.3 PREDICATE LOGIC Prepared By Chiang Yoke Yen(2012) Page 11

The proposition logic is not powerful enough to represent all types of assertions that are used in computer science and mathematics. Predicate logic is a more powerful type of logic to express the meaning of a wide range of statements in mathematics and computer science in ways to reason and explore relationships between objects. Predicate Logic Statement involving variables, such as:- x > 3 x = y +3 x + y = z computer x is functioning properly. are often found in mathematical assertions, in computer programs, and in system specifications. These statements are neither true nor false when the values of the variables are not specified. The statement x is greater than 3 has two part:- First part the variable x, is the subject of the statement. Second part the predicate, is greater than 3 The statement x is greater than 3 denote by P(x), where P denotes the predicate is greater than 3 and x is the variable. Example 17: Let P(x) denote the statement x > 3. What are the truth values of P(4) and P(2)? For P(4), the x = 4, thus the truth value is T since 4 > 3 is a true statement. For P(2), the x = 2, thus the truth value is F since 2 > 3 is a false statement. Example 18: Let Q(x, y) denote the statement x = y +3. What are truth values of the propositions Q(1, 2) and Q(3, 0)? For Q(1, 2), set x = 1 and y = 2 in the statement Q(x, y). Hence the truth value is F since 1 = 2 + 3 is a false statement. For Q(3, 0), set x = 3 and y = 0 in the statement Q(x, y). Hence the truth value is T since 3 = 0 + 3 is a true statement. Quantifiers Quantification is another important way to create a proposition from a propositional function. Quantification expresses the extent to which a predicate is true over a range of elements. In English, the words all, some, many, none, and few are used in quantification. Two types of quantification:- a) Universal Quantifier (a predicate is true for every element under consideration.) b) Existential Quantifier (there is one or more element under consideration for which predicate is true.) Universal Quantifier Prepared By Chiang Yoke Yen(2012) Page 12

The universal quantifier of P(x) is the statement P(x) for all values of x in the domain, denoted by, which read as for all x P(x) or for every x P(x) and called the universal quantifier. An element for which P(x) is false is called a counterexample of. is same as conjunction. Example 19: Let P(x) be the statement x + 1 > x. What is the truth value of the quantification, where the domain consists of all real numbers? The quantification is true since P(x) is true for all real numbers x. Example 20: Let Q(x) be the statement x < 2.What is the truth value of the quantification, where the domain consists of all real numbers? Q(x) is not true for every real number x, because, for instance Q(3) is false. That is, x = 3 is a counterexample for the statement. Thus is false. Existential Quantifier The existential quantifier of P(x) is the proposition There exist an element x in the domain such that P(x), denoted by, which read as there is an x such that P(x), there is at least one x such that P(x) or for some x P(x). quantifier. is false if and only if P(x) is false for every element of the P(x). is same as disjunction. is called the existential Example 21: Let P(x) denote the statement x > 3. What is the truth value of the quantification, where the domain consists of all real numbers? Because x > 3 is sometimes true for instance, when x = 4, thus is true. Let Q(x) denote the statement x = x + 1. What is the truth value of the quantification, where the domain consists of all real numbers? Because Q(x) is false for every real number x, the existential quantifier of Q(x), which is, is false. The truth value of and summarized as: is true when there is all x for P(x) is true and it is false when P(x) is false for either x. is true when there is an x for which P(x) is true and it is false when P(x) is false for every x. Translating English Sentences into Logical Expressions Translating English into logical expression becomes more complex when quantifiers are needed. There can be many ways to translate a particular sentence. Example 22: Express the statement Every student in this class has studied calculus using predicates and quantifiers. Prepared By Chiang Yoke Yen(2012) Page 13

First step: Rewrite the statement so that can identify the appropriate quantifiers to use. For every student in this class, that student has studied calculus. Second step: Introduce a variable x so that the statement becomes For every student x in this class, x has studied calculus. Third step: Introduce C(x), which is the statement x has studied calculus. If the domain for x consists of the students in the class, then the statement translate as. Example 23: Express the statements Some student in this class has visited Malacca using predicates and quantifiers. First step: Rewrite the statement so that can identify the appropriate quantifiers to use. There is a student in this class, that the student has visited Malacca. Second step: Introduce a variable x so that the statement becomes There is a student in x this class, that x has visited Malacca. Third step: Introduce M(x), which is the statement x has visited Malacca. If the domain for x consists of the students in the class, then the statement translate as. Example 24: Let C(x, y) be the predicate x clever than y and let the universe of discourse be the set of all students. Use quantifiers to express the statement Not everyone is not clever than someone. First step: Rewrite the statement so that can identify the appropriate quantifiers to use. Not every students is not clever than some students. Second step: Introduce a variable x so that the statement becomes Not every x is not clever than some y. Third step: Hence, the statement translate as. Example 25: Let P(x, y) be the predicate x loves y and let the universe of discourse be the set of all people in Malaysia. Express the quantification in sentences. express to someone in Malaysia. express to everyone in Malaysia. Because P(x, y) is the predicate x loves y, thus express to x not love y Combine all the sentences and will become Someone in Malaysia not love everyone in Malaysia. Tutorial Exercise 1.3 Prepared By Chiang Yoke Yen(2012) Page 14

1. Let P(x) be the statement the word x contains the letter a. What are the truth values? a) P(Discrete) b) P(Mathematics) c) P(True) d) P(False) 2. Let Q(x, y) denote the statement x 2 > y. What are the truth values? a) Q(1, 2) b) Q(-3, 8) c) Q(, 3) 3. Let P(x) be the statement x likes subject mathematics, where the domain for x consists of all students. Express each of these quantifications in English. a) b) c) d) 4. Let Q(x) denote the statement x + 1 = 2x. If the universe of discourse is all integers, what are these truth values? a) Q(0) b) Q(-1) c) Q(1) d) e) f) g) 5. Let C(x, y) be the statement x is a friend of y, where the domain for x and y consists of all people. Use quantifications to express each of the following statements. a) Everyone is a friend of everyone. b) Not everyone is a friend of someone. c) Someone is not a friend of someone. d) There is a friend of John. e) Mary is not a friend of everyone. 6. Let P(x, y) be the statement x dislike y, where the domain for x is all students and the domain for y consists of all subjects. Express each of these quantifications in English. a) x y P(x, y) b) x y P(x, y) c) x y P(x, y) d) x P(x, Mathematics) Prepared By Chiang Yoke Yen(2012) Page 15

e) y P(Maria, y) 7. Let H(x) be the statement x is hardworking, N(x) be the statement x is naughty and C(x) be the statement x is clever, where the domain for x consists of all students. Use quantifications to express each of the following statements. a) Some students are clever but naughty. b) Not all students are clever and hardworking. c) Some students are clever, hardworking and not naughty. d) All students are clever, or hardworking or naughty. Prepared By Chiang Yoke Yen(2012) Page 16