arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 12 Nov 1999

Similar documents
arxiv:quant-ph/ v2 17 Jun 1996

On PPT States in C K C M C N Composite Quantum Systems

arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 19 Oct 1995

arxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 5 Mar 2010

A completely entangled subspace of maximal dimension

arxiv: v3 [quant-ph] 17 Nov 2014

ENTANGLED STATES ARISING FROM INDECOMPOSABLE POSITIVE LINEAR MAPS. 1. Introduction

arxiv:quant-ph/ v5 10 Feb 2003

CLASSIFICATION OF MAXIMALLY ENTANGLED STATES OF SPIN 1/2 PARTICLES

arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 22 Aug 2005

Permutations and quantum entanglement

Entanglement, mixedness, and spin-flip symmetry in multiple-qubit systems

arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 28 May 1998

Genuine three-partite entangled states with a hidden variable model

arxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 4 Jul 2013

arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 13 Mar 2007

FACIAL STRUCTURES FOR SEPARABLE STATES

The Minimum Size of Unextendible Product Bases in the Bipartite Case (and Some Multipartite Cases)

Boundary of the Set of Separable States

Quantum Correlations as Necessary Precondition for Secure Communication

arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 29 Mar 2003

arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 8 Oct 2002

Unambiguous Discrimination Between Linearly Dependent States With Multiple Copies

Application of Structural Physical Approximation to Partial Transpose in Teleportation. Satyabrata Adhikari Delhi Technological University (DTU)

arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 9 Apr 1998

Theory of Quantum Entanglement

Volume of the set of separable states

Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors: An Introduction

arxiv:quant-ph/ Oct 2002

Multi-particle entanglement via two-party entanglement

Unique decompositions, faces, and automorphisms of separable states

Optimal Realizations of Controlled Unitary Gates

Geometry of Entanglement

Entanglement from the vacuum

Max-Planck-Institut für Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften Leipzig

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Chemistry 5.76 Revised February, 1982 NOTES ON MATRIX METHODS

arxiv: v3 [quant-ph] 5 Jun 2015

Quantum Entanglement- Fundamental Aspects

arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 27 Jul 2005

Distillability sudden death in qutrit-qutrit systems under amplitude damping arxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 15 Dec 2009

Quantum Computing with Para-hydrogen

arxiv:quant-ph/ v2 21 Oct 2003

Incompatibility Paradoxes

arxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 20 Mar 2014

Borromean Entanglement Revisited

Entanglement properties of positive operators with ranges in completely entangled subspaces

arxiv: v3 [quant-ph] 27 Feb 2009

IBM Research Report. Conditions for Separability in Generalized Laplacian Matrices and Diagonally Dominant Matrices as Density Matrices

arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 19 Mar 2006

arxiv:quant-ph/ v5 6 Apr 2005

Some Bipartite States Do Not Arise from Channels

arxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 30 Dec 2018

arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 20 Apr 1995

Entanglement in the quantum Heisenberg XY model

Quantum Entanglement: Detection, Classification, and Quantification

Estimation of Optimal Singlet Fraction (OSF) and Entanglement Negativity (EN)

Max-Planck-Institut für Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften Leipzig

Characterization of Bipartite Entanglement

arxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 16 Nov 2018

Limitations on separable measurements by convex optimization

Entanglement witnesses

LINEAR ALGEBRA BOOT CAMP WEEK 2: LINEAR OPERATORS

Notes on basis changes and matrix diagonalization

arxiv:quant-ph/ v2 3 Oct 2000

PHYS 705: Classical Mechanics. Rigid Body Motion Introduction + Math Review

On the power of unentangled measurements on two antiparallel spins

arxiv:quant-ph/ v3 17 Jul 2005

arxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 3 Jan 2008

Unspeakable quantum information. Asher Peres and Petra F. Scudo. Department of Physics, Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel

BOGOLIUBOV TRANSFORMATIONS AND ENTANGLEMENT OF TWO FERMIONS

arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 28 Apr 2005

Mixed-state sensitivity of several quantum-information benchmarks

STRAND J: TRANSFORMATIONS, VECTORS and MATRICES

What is A + B? What is A B? What is AB? What is BA? What is A 2? and B = QUESTION 2. What is the reduced row echelon matrix of A =

arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 28 Oct 2003

Entanglement: Definition, Purification and measures

arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 1 Jun 2000

Generalized Bell Inequality and Entanglement Witness

arxiv:quant-ph/ v2 24 Dec 2003

Introduction to Quantum Information Hermann Kampermann

TELEBROADCASTING OF ENTANGLED TWO-SPIN-1/2 STATES

Fidelity of Quantum Teleportation through Noisy Channels

arxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 17 Nov 2016

On balance of information in bipartite quantum communication systems: entanglement-energy analogy

ENGI 9420 Lecture Notes 2 - Matrix Algebra Page Matrix operations can render the solution of a linear system much more efficient.

DYNAMICS OF ENTANGLEMENT OF THREE-MODE GAUSSIAN STATES IN THE THREE-RESERVOIR MODEL

On the structure of a reversible entanglement generating set for three partite states

Chapter 2 The Density Matrix

Quantum mysteries revisited again

A Note on the Geometric Interpretation of Bell s Inequalities

Quantum interference and evolution of entanglement in a system of three-level atoms

On the Entanglement Properties of Two-Rebits Systems. Abstract

Multiplicativity of Maximal p Norms in Werner Holevo Channels for 1 < p 2

A Hamiltonian for Quantum Copying. Dima Mozyrsky, Vladimir Privman. Department of Physics, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY 13699, USA.

Introduction to entanglement theory & Detection of multipartite entanglement close to symmetric Dicke states

arxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 21 Oct 2013

arxiv:quant-ph/ Jan 2000

The goal of this chapter is to study linear systems of ordinary differential equations: dt,..., dx ) T

Logical operators of quantum codes

DECAY OF SINGLET CONVERSION PROBABILITY IN ONE DIMENSIONAL QUANTUM NETWORKS

Transcription:

Construction of quantum states with bound entanglement arxiv:quant-ph/9911056v1 12 Nov 1999 Dagmar Bruß 1 and Asher Peres 2 1 Institut für Theoretische Physik, Universität Hannover, D-30167 Hannover, Germany 2 Department of Physics, Technion Israel Institute of Technology, 32000 Haifa, Israel Abstract We present a new family of bound-entangled quantum states in 3 3 dimensions. Their density matrix ρ depends on 7 independent parameters and has 4 different non-vanishing eigenvalues. PACS 03.67.Hk, 03.65.Bz, 89.70.+c 1

Entangled quantum states have been used since the very early days of quantum mechanics for computing the properties of atomic and molecular systems [1]. However, it is only in recent years that the existence of a hierarchy of entangled density matrices became apparent, and it is not yet fully understood. There are classical correlations, but there is no quantum entanglement, in separable density matrices that can be written as convex sums, ρ mµ,nν = K w K (ρ K ) mn (ρ K ) µν, (1) where the density matrices (ρ K ) mn and (ρ K ) µν refer to two subsystems, possibly with different dimensions, and the coefficients w K are positive and sum up to unity. If Eq. (1) holds, it readily follows that the partial transpose σ mµ,nν = ρ nµ,mν is another separable density matrix and in particular has no negative eigenvalue. This property gives a very simple necessary condition for separability [2]. It also is a sufficient condition for systems of dimensions 2 2 and 2 3, but not for higher dimensions [3]. The first counterexamples for dimensions 2 4 and 3 3 contained one free parameter [4]. Such states are called bound-entangled [5] because it is impossible to distill from them pure singlets by means of local operations and classical communication. Recently, a new class of bound-entangled states was produced by means of unextendible product bases (UPB) [6]. In these states, the density matrix ρ depends on 6 parameters and is of rank 4 with equal eigenvalues 0.25. If all the matrix elements are real, there are only 4 free parameters, and σ ρ. In the complex case, σ and ρ have similar structures, but they correspond to different UPBs. Here, we present a more general construction of bound-entangled states in 3 3 dimensions, depending on 7 parameters (only 5 if ρ is real and σ = ρ), with 4 different nonvanishing eigenvalues. We hope that this explicit construction will be useful for elucidating properties of bound-entangled states, in particular for proving (or disproving) the conjecture that they satisfy all the Bell inequalities, and therefore are compatible with a local hidden variable description [7, 8]. Other open problems are mentioned in ref. [9]. We write ρ in terms of four unnormalized eigenvectors, ρ = N 4 V j V j, j=1 (2) 2

where the coefficient N = 1/ j V j,v j normalizes ρ to unit trace. The four eigenvalues, N V j,v j, are in general different. Explicitly, we take V 1 = m,0,s; 0,n,0; 0,0,0, V 2 = 0,a,0; b,0,c; 0,0,0, V 3 = n,0,0; 0, m,0; t,0,0, (3) V 4 = 0,b,0; a,0,0; 0,d,0, where the components of V j are listed in the order 00, 10, 20; 01,... It is easily seen that the 9th row and column of ρ vanish. The remaining 8 8 matrix is like a chessboard, with the odd-odd components depending on m,n,s,t, and the even-even components on a,b,c,d (still, some of these components are zeros). In principle, all 8 parameters on the right hand side of Eqs. (3) can be complex (special values of these parameters yield results equivalent to those obtained by using UPBs). However, westillhavethefreedomofchoosingtheoverallphaseofeach V j (thisobviously does not change ρ). Furthermore, we can define new phases for the basis vectors e k and e λ used to describe the two subsystems. This corresponds to rewriting ρ in a different basis without changing its chessboard structure, nor the absolute values of the components of V j. This freedom can be used to make many of these components real, but not all of them, because the two combinations cm/bs and b t/n d are not affected by these changes of phase. This can be seen as follows: the parameters in cm/bs appear in V 1 = m,0,s;... and V 2 =...;b,0,c;.... The ratios m/s and b/c are affected only by changes oftherelativephaseof e 1 and e 3, andcm/bsisnotaffectedatall. Likewise, the parameters in b t/n d appear in V 3 = n,0,0;...;t,0,0 and V 4 = 0,b,0;...;0,d,0. The ratiosn /tandb /dareaffected, bothinthesameway, onlybychanges oftherelative phase of e 1 and e 3. There are no other invariants of this type, and we can assume, without loss of generality, that s and t are complex, while the 6 other parameters are real. We now prove that in the generic case (random parameters) ρ is inseparable: as shown in [4], a state ρ is inseparable if the range of ρ contains no product state. This is the case for our ρ, unless the parameters are chosen in a specific way. Indeed, assume that there is a product state such that p,q,r x,y,z = A j V j. (4) 3

Since the 9th components of all the V j vanish, we have rz = 0. Assume that z = 0 (the sameproofisvalidforr = 0,mutatismutandis). Thenthe7thand8thcomponentsvanish, so that A 3 = A 4 = 0. We then have (px)(ry) = (A 1 m)(a 2 c) while (py)(rx) = (A 2 b)(a 1 s), whence mc = bs, which does not hold in general for randomly chosen parameters. Finally, wehave toverifythatσ isapositive matrix, so thattheentanglement isbound. Namely, all the diagonal subdeterminants of σ have to be positive or zero. This gives a large number of inequalities. Here, we shall restrict ourselves to the study of two simple cases. The simplest one is to assume σ = ρ. Owing to the chessboard structure of ρ, this leads to three nontrivial conditions, which can be written, with the parametrization of V j in Eqs. (3): ρ 13 = ρ 31 or ms = m s, ρ 26 = ρ 35 or ac = sn, ρ 48 = ρ 57 or ad = mt. (5) With our choice of phases, these conditions mean that s = ac/n and t = ad/m are real. We thus have 6 free parameters in the vectors V j. These parameters can still be scaled by an arbitrary factor (that will be compensated by N), so that there are 5 independent parameters in our construction. Another, more general way of constructing bound entangled states is to assume that σ is not the same as ρ, but still is spanned by two pairs of eigenvectors with a structure similar to those in Eqs. (3), with new parameters that will be called a,b,... This assumption is obviously compatible with (but not required by) the chessboard structure of σ, which is the partial transpose of ρ. It is then easily seen that the various parameters in the eigenvectors of σ may differ only in their phases from those in the eigenvectors of ρ. We therefore write them as a = ae iα, and so on. This gives 8 additional arbitrary phases, besides those of s and t. The requirement that σ is the partial transpose of ρ imposes 6 conditions on these phases (apart from those on the absolute values). These are fewer conditions than phases at our disposal, so that the parameters s and t can now remain complex. Only their absolute values are restricted by s = ac/n and t = ad/m. (6) We thus have 7 independent free parameters for this case. 4

A natural question is whether this construction can be generalized to higher dimensional spaces, with a larger number of pairs of eigenvectors V j, suitably structured. We have no definite answer: in such a generalization, the number of conditions grows much faster than the number of free parameters, and we think it unlikely that such a generalization is possible, but we have no formal proof. DB acknowledges support from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft under SFB 407. AP was supported by the Gerard Swope Fund and the Fund for Encouragement of Research. References [1] W. Heitler and F. London, Zeits. Phys. 44, 455 (1927). [2] A. Peres, Phys. Rev. Letters 77, 1413 (1996). [3] M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Phys. Lett. A 223, 1 (1996). [4] P. Horodecki, Phys. Lett. A 232, 333 (1997). [5] M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Phys. Rev. Letters 80, 5239 (1998). [6] C. H. Bennett, D. P. DiVincenzo, T. Mor, P. W. Shor, J. A. Smolin, and B. M. Terhal, Phys. Rev. Letters 82, 5385 (1999). See also extended version in quant-ph/9908070. [7] A. Peres, Found. Phys. 28, 589 (1999). [8] R. F. Werner and M. M. Wolf, Bell s inequalities for states with positive partial transpose quant-ph/9910063. [9] P. Horodecki, J. A. Smolin, B. M. Terhal, and A. V. Thapliyal, Rank two boundentangled states do not exist quant-ph/9910122. 5