Euclidean Buildings. Guyan Robertson. Newcastle University

Similar documents
INVARIANT DISTRIBUTIONS ON PROJECTIVE SPACES OVER LOCAL FIELDS

BRUHAT-TITS BUILDING OF A p-adic REDUCTIVE GROUP

Zeta functions of buildings and Shimura varieties

1.3 Group Actions. Exercise Prove that a CAT(1) piecewise spherical simplicial complex is metrically flag.

Bruhat-Tits Buildings

A strong Schottky Lemma for nonpositively curved singular spaces

ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF RANK 1 GROUPS OVER NON ARCHIMEDEAN LOCAL FIELDS

Buildings. Brian Lehmann Cambridge University Part III May Graduate Research Fellowship.

A MOORE BOUND FOR SIMPLICIAL COMPLEXES

COUNTEREXAMPLES TO THE COARSE BAUM-CONNES CONJECTURE. Nigel Higson. Unpublished Note, 1999

1 Fields and vector spaces

Infinite generation of non-cocompact lattices on right-angled buildings

An introduction to arithmetic groups. Lizhen Ji CMS, Zhejiang University Hangzhou , China & Dept of Math, Univ of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI 48109

arxiv: v2 [math.mg] 25 Oct 2015

Zeta functions in Number Theory and Combinatorics

The Symmetric Space for SL n (R)

Kasparov s operator K-theory and applications 4. Lafforgue s approach

Part II. Geometry and Groups. Year

Coxeter Groups and Artin Groups

Geometric Structure and the Local Langlands Conjecture

Amenability of actions on the boundary of a building

EKT of Some Wonderful Compactifications

Algorithmic Treatment of Algebraic Modular Forms Diamant Symposium Fall 2015

Groups and Symmetries

Mostow Rigidity. W. Dison June 17, (a) semi-simple Lie groups with trivial centre and no compact factors and

Bredon finiteness properties of groups acting on CAT(0)-spaces

L(C G (x) 0 ) c g (x). Proof. Recall C G (x) = {g G xgx 1 = g} and c g (x) = {X g Ad xx = X}. In general, it is obvious that

Small cancellation theory and Burnside problem.

MA4H4 - GEOMETRIC GROUP THEORY. Contents of the Lectures

Smith theory. Andrew Putman. Abstract

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.gr] 1 Jan 1992

Chapter One. Affine Coxeter Diagrams

Random Walks on Hyperbolic Groups IV

Conjugacy of 2 spherical subgroups of Coxeter groups and parallel walls. 1 Introduction. 1.1 Conjugacy of 2 spherical subgroups

Cohomology of Coxeter groups and buildings

arxiv: v1 [math.gr] 17 Jul 2014

Buildings, Bruhat decompositions, unramified principal series

Classification of root systems

Locally definable groups and lattices

Z n -free groups are CAT(0)

Permutation Groups. John Bamberg, Michael Giudici and Cheryl Praeger. Centre for the Mathematics of Symmetry and Computation

TABLE 2 Thin point-symp incidence matrix

EXERCISES IN MODULAR FORMS I (MATH 726) (2) Prove that a lattice L is integral if and only if its Gram matrix has integer coefficients.

Math 249B. Tits systems

Exercises on chapter 1

120A LECTURE OUTLINES

Note that a unit is unique: 1 = 11 = 1. Examples: Nonnegative integers under addition; all integers under multiplication.

Math 121 Homework 5: Notes on Selected Problems

THE UNIT GROUP OF A REAL QUADRATIC FIELD

The L 3 (4) near octagon

Groups up to quasi-isometry

ALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM PROBLEMS

ORBITAL DIGRAPHS OF INFINITE PRIMITIVE PERMUTATION GROUPS

GROUPS AND THEIR REPRESENTATIONS. 1. introduction

ALGEBRA EXERCISES, PhD EXAMINATION LEVEL

Definitions, Theorems and Exercises. Abstract Algebra Math 332. Ethan D. Bloch

ADELIC VERSION OF MARGULIS ARITHMETICITY THEOREM. Hee Oh

Some notes on Coxeter groups

Bruhat Tits buildings and representations of reductive p-adic groups

Math 429/581 (Advanced) Group Theory. Summary of Definitions, Examples, and Theorems by Stefan Gille

Math 249B. Geometric Bruhat decomposition

6 Orthogonal groups. O 2m 1 q. q 2i 1 q 2i. 1 i 1. 1 q 2i 2. O 2m q. q m m 1. 1 q 2i 1 i 1. 1 q 2i. i 1. 2 q 1 q i 1 q i 1. m 1.

Algebra Review. Instructor: Laszlo Babai Notes by Vincent Lucarelli and the instructor. June 15, 2001

Supplement. Dr. Bob s Modern Algebra Glossary Based on Fraleigh s A First Course on Abstract Algebra, 7th Edition, Sections 0 through IV.

0 Sets and Induction. Sets

LECTURES ON SHIMURA CURVES: ARITHMETIC FUCHSIAN GROUPS

Exterior powers and Clifford algebras

On lengths on semisimple groups

Introduction to Topology

Boundaries of systolic groups

ABSTRACT ALGEBRA WITH APPLICATIONS

EQUIVARIANT COHOMOLOGY. p : E B such that there exist a countable open covering {U i } i I of B and homeomorphisms

Bredon, Introduction to compact transformation groups, Academic Press

MATH 101: ALGEBRA I WORKSHEET, DAY #3. Fill in the blanks as we finish our first pass on prerequisites of group theory.

Automorphism groups of Lorentzian lattices.

RELATIVE HYPERBOLICITY AND ARTIN GROUPS

Houston Journal of Mathematics. c 2000 University of Houston Volume 26, No. 4, 2000

LIMIT GROUPS FOR RELATIVELY HYPERBOLIC GROUPS, II: MAKANIN-RAZBOROV DIAGRAMS

Vertex opposition in spherical buildings

Relative hyperbolicity, classifying spaces, and lower algebraic K -theory

SYMMETRIC SUBGROUP ACTIONS ON ISOTROPIC GRASSMANNIANS

Solutions to Problem Set 1

H(G(Q p )//G(Z p )) = C c (SL n (Z p )\ SL n (Q p )/ SL n (Z p )).

Homogeneous Coordinate Ring

Parabolic subgroups Montreal-Toronto 2018

Algebra Exam Syllabus

On the singular elements of a semisimple Lie algebra and the generalized Amitsur-Levitski Theorem

Page Points Possible Points. Total 200

Margulis Superrigidity I & II

COARSE STRUCTURES ON GROUPS. 1. Introduction

Some algebraic properties of. compact topological groups

Isometries of the Hilbert Metric

Computing Unit Groups of Orders

The fundamental group of a visual boundary versus the fundamental group at infinity

Algebraic Number Theory Notes: Local Fields

1. Let r, s, t, v be the homogeneous relations defined on the set M = {2, 3, 4, 5, 6} by

Real Analysis Prelim Questions Day 1 August 27, 2013

Geometric and topological aspects of Coxeter groups and buildings

arxiv: v1 [math.gr] 2 Aug 2017

i=1 β i,i.e. = β 1 x β x β 1 1 xβ d

Transcription:

Euclidean Buildings Guyan Robertson Newcastle University

Contents 1 Overview of Buildings 2 Lattices, Coset Spaces, Normal Form 3 The Ãn 1 building of PGL n (F) 4 The Boundary 5 Ã 2 groups

Part I Overview of Buildings

Examples Buildings are geometric objects, invented by J Tits (c. 1965). He combined his own work on geometries associated to matrix groups ; previous algebraic work of F Bruhat and C Chevalley. Reference: K Brown, Buildings, Springer 1996. Buildings are simplicial complexes satisfying certain axioms.

Example 1 If V is a vector space of dimension n + 1 over a field k, construct the flag complex of proper linear subspaces of V : 1 Vertices of are proper linear subspaces of V. 2 Two vertices V 1, V 2 of are incident if V 1 V 2. 3 Simplices are chains V 1 V 2 V q. Note that Maximal simplices (called chambers) have n vertices. Therefore has dimension n 1.

A projective plane k = Z/2Z, dim V = 3. Vertices of are lines and planes in V. contains 28 hexagonal apartments. Any two chambers lie in a common apartment. GL 3 (k) is a group of symmetries of of order 168.

Example 2 is a tree and every vertex has degree 3. Apartments are lines (infinite both ways). There are uncountably many apartments. Any two chambers lie in a common apartment. Is there a natural group of symmetries of?

Chamber Complexes Let be a simplicial complex such that all maximal simplices (chambers) have the same dimension d. Chambers C, D are adjacent if C D has codimension 1. is a chamber complex if any two chambers are connected by a sequence of adjacent chambers (a gallery). C D

Buildings A chamber complex is thin [thick] if each simplex of codimension 1 is a face of exactly 2 [at least 3] chambers. thin thick A building is a thick chamber complex which is a union of thin chamber complexes, called apartments, satisfying: 1 Apartments have the same dimension as. 2 Any two simplices of lie in a common apartment. 3 If apartments Σ, Σ contain a common chamber, then there is an isomorphism Σ Σ fixing Σ Σ pointwise.

Types of buildings All apartments are isomorphic. If apartments are spheres, is called spherical. If apartments are euclidean spaces, is called euclidean. A projective plane is a 1-dimensional spherical building. A 1-dimensional euclidean building is a tree and its apartments are lines (infinite both ways). Focus now on euclidean buildings...

Apartments in euclidean buildings of dimension 2 Ã 2 B 2 G 2

The euclidean building of SL 2 (Q p ) The group SL 2 (Q p ) acts on its euclidean building, which is a (p + 1)-regular tree. A brief description of : A vertex is a maximal compact subgroup K of SL 2 (Q p ). e.g. K = SL 2 (Z p ). An edge is (K, K ) where K K is a maximal proper subgroup of K and K. PGL 2 (Q p ) acts on via K g 1 Kg

Example (p = 3) In the building of SL 2 (Q 3 ), a vertex K has four neighbours where g = ( ) 3 0, 0 1 g 1 Kg ( ) 3 1, 0 1 ( ) 3 2, 0 1 ( ) 3 1 0. 0 1

The building of SL 3 (Q p ) The group SL 3 (Q p ) acts on its euclidean building. A vertex is a maximal compact subgroup K of SL 3 (Q p ). e.g. K = SL 3 (Z p ). An edge is (K, K ) where K K is a maximal proper subgroup of K and K. PGL 3 (Q p ) acts on via K g 1 Kg

has type Ã2: its apartments are Ã2 Coxeter complexes. Each edge lies on p + 1 triangles. p = 2 :

The neighbours of a vertex (p = 2) A ball of radius one. The link of a vertex is a projective plane.

Local Structure and Global Structure One can replace Q p by an algebraic extension K. If K 1 K 2, then the buildings of SL 3 (K 1 ) and SL 3 (K 2 ) are not isomorphic. However, spheres of radius 1 are isomorphic :

SL 2 is different : e.g. the buildings of SL 2 (Q 2 ), SL 2 (Q 2 ( 1)) are isomorphic. SL 2 is atypical. Semisimple algebraic groups of higher relative rank behave like SL 3.

Part II Lattices, Coset Spaces, Normal Form

Local Fields: Notation F: a local field with residue field k of order q. O: ring of integers. O = {x F : x 1}. p = {x F : x < 1} = πo the maximal ideal. Uniformizer π chosen in p \ p 2. Thus p = πo The Haar measure µ on (F, +) satisfies µ(xe) = x µ(e). Normalized: µ(o) = 1.

Lattices A F n : n-dimensional vector space over F. B A lattice L F n is an O-submodule of the form Ov 1 + + Ov n for some basis (v 1,..., v n ) of F n. Canonical basis (e 1,..., e n ) Write 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 25 C G = GL(F n ) = GL n (F). Oe 1 + + Oe n = O n F n. v 1,..., v n = Ov 1 + + Ov n. 1 0 = O 0 + O 5 + O 0 0 0 0 25

D G acts transitively on bases, hence on lattices. E Therefore, K : = {g G : g(o n ) = O n } L : = {lattices} = G/K gk g(o n ) g(o n ) O n g has entries in O g(o n ) O n g 1 (O n ) O n K = GL n (O) := {g GL n (F) : g, g 1 have integer entries} = {g GL n (F) : det g O and entries of g are in O}.

F Double Cosets in General: (1) Let G be any group; and let H, K be subgroups of G. (2) G/H : = {cosets gh} H\G/K : = {cosets HgK} = orbits in G of right H-action = orbits in G of (left, right) (H K)-action = orbits in G/K of left H-action = orbits in H\G of right K-action (3) G acts diagonally on G/H G/K g (g 1 H, g 2 K) = (gg 1 H, gg 2 K). Space of orbits: G\(G/H G/K) identified with H\G/K. G (g 1 H, g 2 K) Hg 1 1 g 2 K G (H, gk) HgK

G Proposition. If G = GL n (F), K = GL n (O), then K\G/K has coset representatives: π j 1 0... ; j 1 j 2 j n. 0 π jn Interpretation: If (L 1, L 2 ) L L (= G/K G/K), then g G such that 1 0 π j 1 0 (g(l 1 ), g(l 2 )) =...,.... 0 1 0 π jn That is, for some basis (v 1,..., v n ), L 1 = Ov 1 + + Ov n L 2 = Oπ j 1 v 1 +... + Oπ jn v n

Uniqueness of j 1,..., j n : Look at #[(L 1 + π j L 2 )/L 1 ] for varying j. As a function of j, this determines j 1,..., j n up to ordering. Example L 1 = Ov 1 + Ov 2 L 2 = π 3 Ov 1 + π 2 Ov 2 L 1 + L 2 = π 3 Ov 1 + Ov 2 #[(L 1 + L 2 )/L 1 ] = #(π 3 O/O) = q 3 Exercise: Check #[(L 1 + π j L 2 )/L 1 ] for other values of j.

Sufficiency of coset representatives: i.e. diagonalization of an element of G by pre- and post-multiplying by matrices in K is always possible. Note: Kg K = KgK if g is obtained from g by (a) transposing rows/columns; (b) multiplying row/columns by scalar in O ; (c) subtracting an O-multiple of one row (column) from another. Exercise: Fill in the details.

H 0 B =.... G. 0... 0 Proposition. B\G/K has only one point. Therefore BK = G. Note: Bg K = BgK if g is obtained from g by: (a) interchanging columns; (b) subtracting an O-multiple of one column from another; (c) multiplying any row by any constant; (d) subtracting a multiple of row k from row j if k > j. Exercise. Fill in the details, to show BgK = BK for all g G.

I a 1 B 0 =... : a α = 1 G. 0 a n Proposition B 0 \G/K has coset representatives π j 1 A 0 =... : j α Z. π jn Sufficiency: As in H, but can only multiply a row by a constant in O, because B 0 replaces B. Uniqueness: q j α+1 j n = max norm of a determinant of an (n α) (n α) minor chosen from rows α + 1 to n.

Part III The Ãn 1 building of PGL n (F)

A: Projectivization From now on G = PGL n (F) : = GL n (F)/F g ag if a F, K = PGL n (O) : = GL n (O)/O k ak if a G. GL n (O) GL n (F) K G : GL n (O)/GL n (O) F GL n (F)/F and GL n (O) F = O.

The vertex set Initially is just a set of vertices, which will later be organized as the vertices of a simplicial complex. := L/F L al if a F. i.e. L π j L if j Z. [L] will be a vertex of the building. Let O be [O n ]. G = PGL n (F) acts transitively on. Also stab G O = K = PGL n (O). Therefore G/K =.

B: n-volumes Normalize by vol n (O n ) = 1. and vol n (g(o n )) = det g F vol n (O n ) = q i, for some i, vol n (πl) = vol n ((πid n )L) = q n vol n (L). Therefore x = L/F has volume q i, determined up to factors of q n. Therefore i is determined mod n.

C: as a typed set Define τ : I = Z/nZ by vol n (x) = q τ(x). Example τ π j 1 π j 2 π j 3 vol 3 π j 1 π j 2 π j 3 (O) = j 1 j 2 j 3 + 3Z. (O 3 ) = q j 1 j 2 j 3,

D: as a graph Abuse of notation: x will be used to denote both an element of and a representative in L. Definition There exists an edge between x, y if for some representative lattices πy x y. Reflexivity: πy x y πx πy x, πy y.

Normal Form: For some basis (v 1,..., v n ) and 1 µ n 1, y = Ov 1 + + Ov n x = πov 1 + + πov µ + Ov µ+1 + + Ov n πy = πov 1 + + πov µ + πov µ+1 + + πoµ n (See Part II.G) τ(y) = τ(x) + µ

Nearest Neighbours in the building Fix y L (and use the same notation for a lattice and its equivalence class). y, πy and y/πy are O-modules. If y = Ov 1 + + Ov n then y/πy = (O/πO) v 1 + + (O/πO) v n = kv 1 + + kv n #(y/πy) = q n where k = O/πO, the residue field with q elements. Now y/πy is a k-vector space, with dim k (y/πy) = n and so y/πy = k n.

The star of a vertex y is defined to be star(y) = {x : d(x, y) = 1}. πy x y 0 x/πy y/πy = k n. So x/πy is a k-subspace of y/πy = k n. Therefore star(y) = {V k n : V a k-subspace, 1 dim k V n 1}.

star(y) for n = 2. A vertex y has q + 1 neighbours corresponding to 1-dimensional subspaces of k 2. That is, corresponding to points of P 1 (k). Example. G = PGL 2 (Q 5 ), y = O 2 = 1 0, π = 5. 0 1 π 1 0 1 π 0 0 1 π 2 0 1 1 0 0 π π 3 0 1 π 4 0 1

star(y) for n = 3. Assume that τ(y) = 0. type 1 neighbours = { 1-dim. subspaces of k 3 } = points of P 2 (k). type 2 neighbours = { 2-dim. subspaces of k 3 } = lines of P 2 (k). No. of neighbours = 2.(q 2 + q + 1).

A star in the building of PGL 3 (Q 2 )

E: as a graph: distance Let x 0,..., x m be a chain. x 0 x 2 x 1 x m Then there exist representative lattices such that πx 1 x 0 x 1 πx 2 x 1 x 2. πx m x m 1 x m Then Therefore x 0 πx 1 π 2 x 2 π m x m. π m x m x 0 x 1 x m.

FACT: For x, y, d(x, y) = m, where m is the smallest integer such that for some representative lattices, π m y x y. Example. We now show an example where d(x, y) m for m = 3. y = Ov 1 + Ov 2 + Ov 3 x = π 3 Ov 1 + πov 2 + Ov 3 π 3 y = π 3 Ov 1 + π 3 Ov 2 + π 3 Ov 3.

Ov 1 + Ov 2 + Ov 3 πov 1 + Ov 2 + Ov 3 πov 1 + πov 2 + Ov 3 π 2 Ov 1 + Ov 2 + Ov 3 π 2 Ov 1 + πov 2 + Ov 3 π 3 Ov 1 + πov 2 + Ov 3 Therefore d(x, y) 3.

F: as a simplicial complex Say {x 1,..., x J } is a simplex if d(x j, x k ) = 1 for 1 j, k J. Only possible if (in some ordering, for some representative lattices), πx J x 1 x 2 x J. [Proof omitted.] Note. 0 x 1 /πx J x 2 /πx J x J /πx J = k n, is a flag of k-subspaces of x J /{πx J }.

G: Chambers of. (1) A chamber is a maximal simplex C = {x 1,..., x n } with πx n x 1 x 2 x n, τ(x j ) = j + τ(x n ). (2) 0 x 1 /πx n x 2 /πx n x n /πx n = k n is a complete flag of k-subspaces. (3) rank( ) := rank(c) := n. n = 3 : However rank(g as algebraic group) = n 1.

H: Apartments of The apartment A associated to a fixed basis (v 1,..., v n ) of F n is A = {π j 1 Ov 1 + + π jn Ov n : j α Z} Recall that π j 1 Ov 1 + + π jn Ov n denote lattice classes. Notation: [j 1,..., j n ] = π j 1 Ov 1 + + π jn Ov n τ ([j 1,..., j n ]) = j 1 j n. Note that [j 1,..., j n ] = [j + j 1,..., j + j n ]. G acts transitively on bases, hence on apartments.

Example. n = 2. [0, 2] [0, 1] [0, 0] [0, 1] [0, 2] [2, 0] [1, 0] Example. n = 3. [ 1, 0, 0] [0, 0, 1] [0, 1, 0] [0, 1, 0] [0, 0, 1] [1, 0, 0]

0 2 2 0 1 2 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 τ = 0 τ = 1 τ = 2 0 0-1 0-1 -1 Any two vertices lie in a common apartment. Reason: If L 1, L 2 L then, for some basis (v 1,..., v n ), (c.f. Section 1.G.) L 1 = Ov 1 + + Ov n, L 2 = Oπ jn v 1 + + Oπ jn v n.

Part IV The Boundary

A: Sectors (Weyl Chambers) Let v 1,..., v n be a basis for F n. W = {π j 1 Ov 1 + + π jn Ov n : j 1 j n } is a sector with basepoint Ov 1 + + Ov n. n = 2 n = 3

An apartment is an union of n! sectors intersecting only at the walls, defined by the conditions j α = j α+1. If x, y, there exists a basis v 1,..., v n with x = Ov 1 + + Ov n, y = π j 1 Ov 1 + + π jn Ov n, j 1 j n. Therefore there exists a sector based at x which contains y. x y

Consider the sector W 0 = {π j 1 Oe 1 + + π jn Oe n : j 1 j n } based at O. Then O W 0 is a set of coset representatives for G\{ }. Any (x, y) can be written with g G, z W 0. (x, y) = (g(o), g(z)), y x O z

To each sector W we associate a boundary point ω, as follows. If W = {π j 1 Ov 1 + + π jn Ov n : j 1 j n } and k 1 k n, then W = {π j 1+k 1 Ov 1 + + π jn+kn Ov n : j 1 j n } is a subsector of W. W W W, W will represent the same boundary point ω.

Assertion: If j 1 < j 2 < < j n, (meaning [j 1,..., j n ] is an interior vertex of W ), then O stab G (O, [j 1,..., j n ]) = g PGL n(o) : g αβ O π jα j βo α < β α = β α > β This is proved by using the facts that stab G (O) = PGL n (O) and stab G (ho) = hpgl n (O)h 1, where π j 1 0 h =.... 0 π jn

Example (n = 2) [0, 0] [0, 4] O x x = [0, 4] = Oe 1 + π 4 Oe 2. Here stab G (O, x) = {( )} O O π 4 O O.

Consequence: If k 1 k n, j 1 j n, then stab G (O, [k 1,..., k n ]) stab G (O, [j 1 + k 1,..., j n + k n ]). Geometrically: [0, 0] [0, 3] fixed fixed also fixed

[0, 0, 0] fixed also fixed [0, 2, 3] fixed

The convex hull of [0,..., 0] and [l 1,..., l n ] W is {[j 1,..., j n ] : j 1 j n, l 1 j 1 l n j n }. It s points are fixed by G if [0,..., 0] and [l 1,..., l n ] are fixed. The definition of convex hull extends to any pair x, y, by G-action; also to any set of points.

The n 1 neighbours of O which lie in the sector W 0 are of the form [0,..., 0, 1,..., 1]. [0, 1, 1] [0, 0, 1] n = 3 C 0 [0, 0, 0] C 0 = base chamber of W 0.

I = stab G (all x C O ) (Iwahori subgroup) O O O = πo O O (n = 3). πo πo O Fact: G acts transitively on {basepointed chambers}. Therefore G/I = {basepointed chambers}. Theorem Any two chambers lie in a common apartment.

Outline of Proof Any chamber can be written x n = Ov 1 + + Ov n x 1 = Ov 1 + + Ov n 1 + πov n x 2 = Ov 1 + + Ov n 2 + πov n 1 + πov n...... x n 1 = Ov 1 + πov 2 + Ov n 2 + πov n 1 + πov n

I \G/I has coset representatives like 0 π 7 0 0 π 3 0 0 0 0 0 π 9 0 0 0 0 π 1 Given two basepointed chambers C 1, C 2, there exist bases giving C 1 and C 2 respectively and differing only by permutations and factors π j on each element. Exercise. Fill in the details.

Notation: [j 1,..., j n ] = B: Stabilizers π j 1 0... 0 π jn = π j 1 Oe 1 + + π jn Oe n π j 1 0 =... (O) 0 π jn Thus W 0 = {[j 1,..., j n ] : j 1 j n }. Also stab G (O) = PGL n (O). Therefore π j 1 0 π j 1 0 stab G ([j 1,..., j n ]) =... PGL n (O)... 0 π jn 0 π jn. = {g GL n (F) : g αβ, (g 1 ) αβ π jα j β O}/O.

Therefore stab G (O, [j 1,..., j n ]) = { } {g GL n (F) : g αβ, (g 1 O if α < β, ) αβ π jα j /O βo. if α > β. Hence stab G (W O ) = {PGL n (O) : g αβ = 0 if α > β}. Example:[n = 2] n 0 ( ) ( ) O O O O π n O O = 0 O.

Suppose: [0,..., 0] W 0 [k 1,..., k n ] [k 1,..., k n ]-subsector W

W = stab G (W ) = π k 1 π k 1... (W O ), π kn... stab G (W O ) π kn π k 1... π kn = 0 if α > β = g PGL n(o) : g αβ O if α = β. π kα k βo if α < β

C: Horocycles W = {Sectors}, W = {π j 1 Ov 1 + + π jn Ov n : j 1 j n }. For k 1 k n, the [k 1,..., k n ]-subsector is {π j 1+k 1 Ov 1 + + π jn+kn Ov n : j 1 j n }. Definition W 1 W 2 if, for some k 1 k n, the [k 1,..., k n ]-subsectors coincide. n = 2 W 1 W 2

n = 3 W 1 common W 2 common

Definition H = W/ Let h 0 = [W 0 ] H. Then, stab G (h 0 ) = stab G k 1 k n π k 1... (W 0 ) π kn { } = 0 if α > β = {g G : g αβ O if α = β := B 0 Example n = 2: B 0 = ( ) O F 0 O G/B 0 = H : gb0 g(h 0 ).

Recall: coset representatives for B 0 \G/K are π j 1 A 0 =... : j α Z. π jn Therefore A 0 parametrizes G\{G/K G/B 0 }. That is, G\ H. Any (x, h) H can be written g π j 1... (O), g(h 0 ) = (g([j 1,..., j n ]), g(h 0 )). π jn for unique [j 1,..., j n ].

The retraction map is defined by r h (x) := [j 1,..., j n ]. Note. r h (x) = r h (y) gx = y with g stab G (h). n = 2 W h = [W ] r h (x) = [1, 0] r h (x) = [0, 0]

n = 3 W r h (x) = [1, 0, 1]

The set is called a horocycle. r 1 h ([0,..., 0]) = {basepoint(w ): [W ] = h} r 1 h 1 ([0,..., 0]) = r 1 h 2 ([0,..., 0]) h 1 = h 2. Therefore identify H with the space of horocycles.

D: The boundary Ω Let W 1, W 2 W. Say W 1 = W2 if W 1, W 2 have a common subsector. W 1 common subsector n = 2 W 2

n = 3 W 1 common W 2 common

Definition Theorem Ω = W/ = Ω = G/B where B = {g G : g αβ = 0 if α > β}. Proof Let ω 0 = [W 0 ] Ω. Then stab G (ω 0 ) = π k 1 g : g... (W 0 ) = π kn k 1 kn l 1 l n π l 1... (W 0 ) π ln

Thus stab G (ω 0 ) = π k 1 k 1 kn l 1 l n π l1 k1... π ln kn... stab G (W 0 ) π kn π k 1... π kn = j 1,...,j n Z = j 1,...,j n Z = A 0 B 0 = B. π j 1 π j 1... stab G π jn k 1 k n... B 0 π jn π k 1... W 0 π kn Therefore, G/B = Ω : gb gω 0

Recall: #(B\G/K) = 1. i.e. G = BK; i.e. G\{Ω } has 1 orbit. x, ω Ω, g G such that x = g(o) and ω = g(ω 0 ). Consequence: There exists an unique sector W based at x representing ω. Uniqueness: Can assume x = 0, ω = ω 0. stab G (O) stab G (ω 0 ) = PGL n (O) B = stab G (W 0 ). Notation: W = conv(o, ω), (recalling that conv(o, ω) is the convex hull of O and ω).

E: Topology of Ω Fix a basepoint y 0. Say ω n ω if conv(y 0, ω n ) conv(y 0, ω) pointwise. (This topology is independent of choice of y 0.) ω 1, ω 2 are close if they have representative sectors based at y o with large common initial segment T. Ω is a totally disconnected compact Hausdorff space.

F: Ω as (the set of chambers of) a building The spherical building of type A n 1 associated with PGL n (F) has as simplices, flags in F n, The space of complete flags V 1 < V 2 < < V k. {0} < V 1 < V 2 < < V n 1 < F n, is identified with G/B = Ω, since B is the stabilizer of Example: n = 3 {0} < [e 1 ] < [e 1, e 2 ] < < [e 1,..., e n ]. An apartment in Ω is (6 chambers)

G: Geometric realization Let be a euclidean building. is a metric space in which each apartment has the euclidean metric. Any two vertices x, y lie in a common apartment E and d(x, y) = d E (x, y). x y is contractible.

A ray is a subset of isometric to [0, ). Two rays are equivalent if they are parallel, i.e. at finite Hausdorff distance from each other. The building at infinity is a spherical building. A point ξ is an equivalence class of rays. For each vertex x of and each ξ, there is a unique ray [x, ξ) with initial vertex x in the parallelism class of ξ. x [x, ξ)

Now let be of type Ã2. Each sector in determines a 1-simplex (chamber) of. Two sectors determine the same chamber of if and only if they contain a common subsector. If [x, ξ) is a sector wall then ξ is a vertex of. If the initial edge of this sector wall is [x, y], and if τ(y) = τ(x) + i then the vertex ξ is said to be of type i 1. Let P be the set of vertices ξ of type 0 and let L be the set of vertices η of type 1. Then (P, L) is a projective plane. A point ξ P and a line η L are incident if and only if they are the vertices of a common chamber in.

[x, η) η L x [x, ξ) ξ P

Part V Ã 2 groups

à 2 groups Let be a locally finite building of type Ã2. α Aut( ) is type rotating if there exists i Z/3Z such that for all vertices v τ(α(v)) = τ(v) + i. An Ã2 group Γ is a group of type rotating automorphisms, which acts freely and transitively on the vertex set of. q = 2 : 8 groups. All are subgroups of PGL 3 (F). q = 3 : 89 groups. Only 21 are subgroups of PGL 3 (F). à 2 groups exist for any prime power q.

Presentation Let (P, L) be a projective plane of order q: P = L = q 2 + q + 1. Let λ : P L be a bijection. A triangle presentation compatible with λ is a set T P P P such that (i) If x, y P, then (x, y, z) T for some z P if and only if y and λ(x) are incident (i.e. y λ(x)). (ii) (x, y, z) T (y, z, x) T. (iii) Given x, y P, then (x, y, z) T for at most one z P.

Form the group Γ = Γ T = P xyz = 1 for (x, y, z) T. (1) The Cayley graph of Γ with respect to the generating set P is the 1-skeleton of a building of type Ã2. Vertex set : Γ Edges : where x P x g gx Γ acts on (by left multiplication)

Example: Mumford s group (1979) D. Mumford constructed Γ M < PGL 3 (Q 2 ) : Γ M is a torsion free lattice in PGL 3 (Q 2 ) ; Γ M acts regularly on the vertex set of. Γ M has generators x 0, x 1,..., x 6, and relators { x 0 x 0 x 6, x 0 x 2 x 3, x 1 x 2 x 6, x 1 x 3 x 5, x 1 x 5 x 4, x 2 x 4 x 5, x 3 x 4 x 6. The 1-skeleton of is the Cayley graph of Γ M. x 0 x 2 x 3 = 1 x 0 x 3 x 2

The projective plane of neighbours of 1 x 1 2 x 3 x 1 1 x 2 x 4 x 1 3 x 2 x 1 5 x 1 x 0 x 5 x 3 x 1 6 x 1 4 x 6 x 1 0 x 0

à 2 groups of Tits type The projective plane (P, L) = PG(2, q) P and L are the 1- and 2-dimensional subspaces of a 3-dimensional vector space V over F q. F q is a subfield of F q 3. Consequence: F q 3 is a 3-dimensional vector space over F q. Identify P with F q 3 /F q. F q 3 = {1, ζ, ζ 2,..., ζ q3 1 }, a cyclic group. F q = ζ 1+q+q2, unique subgroup of order q 1. Therefore P is a cyclic group of order 1 + q + q 2 generated by the element [ζ] = F q ζ. P is a collineation group of order q 2 + q + 1 which acts regularly on P (and on L): a Singer group.

The F q -linear mapping Tr : F q 3 F q is defined by Tr(a) = a + σ(a) + σ 2 (a) where σ(a) = a q, a F q 3. [σ is an automorphism of F q 3 over F q.] The map (x 0, y 0 ) Tr(x 0 y 0 ) is a regular symmetric bilinear form on F q 3, and so the map S S = {y 0 F q 3 : Tr(x 0 y 0 ) = 0 for all x 0 S} is a bijection P L.

If x = F q x 0 P = F q 3 /F q, write Tr(x) = 0 if Tr(x 0 ) = 0; x := (F q x 0 ). Identify a line, i.e., 2-dimensional subspace, with the set of its 1-dimensional subspaces. Then the lines are the subsets of the group P. For x P, let λ 0 (x) = x = {y P : Tr(xy) = 0} ( ) 1 { ( y ) } = y P : Tr = 0. x x This defines a point-line correspondence λ 0 : P L.

The following is a triangle presentation compatible with λ 0 : T 0 = {(x, xξ, xξ q+1 ) : x, ξ P and Tr(ξ) = 0}. (2) The only nontrivial thing to check is that T 0 is invariant under cyclic permutations. If (x, xξ, xξ q+1 ) T 0 then (xξ, xξ q+1, x) = (xξ, (xξ)ξ q, (xξ)(ξ q ) q+1 ) T 0 since Tr(ξ q 0 ) = Tr(ξ 0) and ξ 1+q+q2 0 F q for each ξ 0 F q 3. The group Γ T associated with the presentation (2) is called a group of Tits type.

Groups of Tits type embed as lattice subgroups of PGL 3 (F q ((X ))). For q = 2, Γ T has generators x 0, x 1,..., x 6, and relators { x 0 x 1 x 3, x 1 x 2 x 4, x 2 x 3 x 5, x 3 x 4 x 6, x 4 x 5 x 0, x 5 x 6 x 1, x 6 x 0 x 2.

Appendix: Application to geometric analysis. The Baum-Connes conjecture proposes (for any group Γ) an isomorphism Geometric Group (Group Homology) = Analytic Group K (C r (Γ)) where C r (Γ) := CΓ B(l 2 (Γ)). V. Lafforgue: B-C is true if Γ acts (properly isometrically with compact quotient) on a space of nonpositive curvature and has the following property. (RD) Every rapidly decaying function ξ in l 2 (Γ) lies in C r (Γ).

rapidly decaying means : ξ(g) 2 (1 + g ) 2s <, s R. g Γ P. Jolissaint (1986): Hyperbolic groups (in the sense of Gromov) satisfy (RD). (RD) holds if Γ is a torsion free cocompact lattice in (A) PGL 3 (F), F nonarchimedean; (Ramagge, Robertson, Steger - 1998) (B) PGL 3 (R), PGL 3 (C). (Lafforgue - 2000) These are the first examples of higher rank groups satisfying (RD). Until 1998, B-C was not known for any higher rank group. Open problem for PGL 4.

Underlying obstruction to generalising the method: An apartment in the building of PGL 4 (Q p ) is an à 3 Coxeter complex: Fundamental simplex has dihedral angles: 3 π 3, π 2. 1 1 2 1