Quality Control Procedures for Graphite Furnace AAS using Avanta Software

Similar documents
Direct Determination of Aluminium in Milk by Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrometry

Determination of Pb, Cd, Cr and Ni in Grains Based on Four Chinese National Methods via Zeeman GFAAS

On the use of Deming and quadratic calibrations in analytical chemistry

NOTICE: This method: The laboratories have to study the instrumental conditions appropriate for their own instrumentation.

Atomic Absorption Spectrometer ZEEnit P series

Test Method: CPSC-CH-E

Direct Determination of Cadmium and Lead in honey by Electrothermal Atomization Atomic Absorption Spectrometry with Zeeman Effect Correction

The Measurement of Lead in Food Products by Graphite Furnace AA and SpectraAA-40

--> Buy True-PDF --> Auto-delivered in 0~10 minutes. GB Translated English of Chinese Standard: GB5009.

METHOD 7060A ARSENIC (ATOMIC ABSORPTION, FURNACE TECHNIQUE)

Maintenance with OQ. ZEEnit 700. Operational Qualification OQ within the scope of a maintenance for the. Atomic Absorption Spectrometer

METHOD 3010A ACID DIGESTION OF AQUEOUS SAMPLES AND EXTRACTS FOR TOTAL METALS FOR ANALYSIS BY FLAA OR ICP SPECTROSCOPY

Elemental analysis of river sediment using the Agilent 4200 MP-AES

Meeting the Challenges of Soil Analysis with the Avio 200 ICP-OES

Brooklyn College Department of Chemistry

DRAFT EAST AFRICAN STANDARD

The Determination of Toxic, Trace, and Essential Elements in Food Matrices using THGA Coupled with Longitudinal Zeeman Background Correction

Analysis of domestic sludge using the Agilent 4200 MP-AES

Title Revision No date DETERMINATION OF HEAVY METALS (ARSENIC, CADMIUM, LEAD AND MERCURY) IN COSMETIC PRODUCTS

Application field / Industry branch:

Sodium Chloride - Analytical Standard

Mercury Determination in Lichen, BCR-482, Using the QuickTrace M-7600 CVAAS Mercury Analyzer

Product Descriptions and Offerings

Automated, intelligent sample preparation: Integration of the ESI prepfast Auto-dilution System with the Thermo Scientific icap 7400 ICP-OES

METHOD 9210 POTENTIOMETRIC DETERMINATION OF NITRATE IN AQUEOUS SAMPLES WITH ION-SELECTIVE ELECTRODE

Spectrophotometric Determination of Ferrocyanide in Effluents

By Donna L. Damrau U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY. Open-File Report Denver, Colorado

METHOD 8033 ACETONITRILE BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY WITH NITROGEN-PHOSPHORUS DETECTION

Seawater Extraction Procedure for Trace Metals

Innovative. Intuitive. Concentration (ppb) R = Versatile. Hydra II C Mercury Analyzer

UNITED NATIONS. ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME MEDITERRANEAN ACTION PLAN 25 May 2015 Original: English. UNEP(DEPI)/ MED WG.417/Inf.14

Today s Agilent Solutions for Determining Heavy Metals in Food using Atomic Spectroscopy

Optimizing Analytical Performance in ICP-OES Applications

Copyright ENCO Laboratories, Inc. II. Quality Control. A. Introduction

Using FIMS to Determine Mercury Content in Sewage Sludge, Sediment and Soil Samples

V. LAB REPORT. PART I. ICP-AES (section IVA)

110 Lowell Rd Hudson, NH USA Tel:

Determination of Total Bromine and Iodine Emission Spectrometric Method (ICP-OES) EuSalt/AS

Analysis of high matrix samples using argon gas dilution with the Thermo Scientific icap RQ ICP-MS

Determination of major, minor and trace elements in rice fl our using the 4200 Microwave Plasma- Atomic Emission Spectrometer (MP-AES) Authors

The stimation of Uncertainty by the Utilization of Validation and Quality Control Data; Lead in Gasoline by AAS

Example method validation and MU approach for Cadmium in seafood test method

Hach Method Total Organic Carbon in Finished Drinking Water by Catalyzed Ozone Hydroxyl Radical Oxidation Infrared Analysis

Selenium Determination in Blood using Zeeman Background Correction and Palladium/Ascorbic Acid Chemical Modification

Z/zs. tnitiats: wu\ Z-z* I A. sop-c-102. Determination of Chemical Oxygen Demand. Revision 6. Approval: Effective date: 3. Renewat date: 7lt:,:

Hydride Generation for the Determination of As, Sb, Se and Bi Using the Teledyne Leeman Lab s Prodigy 7 ICP-OES

EPA Method 535: Detection of Degradates of Chloroacetanilides and other Acetamide Herbicides in Water by LC/MS/MS

COMPARISON OF ATOMIZERS

Sodium Chloride - Analytical Standard

Zinc Metal Determination Perkin Elmer Atomic Absorption Spectrometer AAnalyst Procedures

U.S. EPA SW-846 Method 6010C using the Prodigy High Dispersion ICP

Anion and Cation analysis with Professional IC - automatic dilution and sample preparation with SPM

Product Safety Reference Manual. Book 5 - Laboratory Policies and Procedures C

Determination of Off-Odor Compounds in Drinking Water Using an SPME Device with Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry

POLYDEXTROSES. SYNONYMS Modified polydextroses; INS No DEFINITION DESCRIPTION. FUNCTIONAL USES Bulking agent, humectant, stabilizer, thickener

SECTION D.2 AMMONIA NITROGEN

novaa 800 D Atomic Absorption Spectrometer

GB Translated English of Chinese Standard: GB

Cadmium and lead content

PROCEDURES. Pharmacopeial Forum 2 Vol. 36(1) [Jan. Feb. 2009]

Ultra-fast determination of base metals in geochemical samples using the 5100 SVDV ICP-OES

USGS District Laboratory, Troy, NY Dissolved Inorganic Carbon Analysis Standard Operating Procedure

Prof. Dr. Biljana Škrbić, Jelena Živančev

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES SOP: 1828 PAGE: 1 of 14 REV: 0.0 DATE: 05/12/95 ANALYSIS OF METHYL PARATHION IN CARPET SAMPLES BY GC/MS

OPTIMIZING METALS SAMPLE PREP

U.S. EPA SW-846 Method 6010C Using the Prodigy7 High- Dispersion ICP Introduction. Application Note - AN1305. Experimental

Sulfotepp impurities in Chlorpyrifos EC formulations

University Wet Chemistry Analyzer Packages

Determinations by Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy and Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission

Hach Method Spectrophotometric Measurement of Free Chlorine (Cl 2 ) in Finished Drinking Water

Revision: 11 (MBAS) ALLOWAY METHOD OUTLINE. Standard Laboratory Method:

High Throughput Water Analysis using Agilent 7900 ICP-MS coupled with ESI prepfast

METHOD 9040B. ph ELECTROMETRIC MEASUREMENT

China Soil Pollution Survey: Elemental Analysis of Soil and Sediment Digests by ICP-MS

EPA Method 535: Detection of Degradates of Chloroacetanilides and other Acetamide Herbicides in Water by LC/MS/MS

USGS Troy WSC Laboratory Inductively Coupled Plasma- NH4Cl Soil Extracts SOP 425 Jordan Road Rev. No. 2.0 Troy, NY Date: 03/16/2012 Page 1 of 7

A New Cross-Shaped Graphite Furnace with Ballast Body for Reduction of Interferences in Atomic Absorption Spectrometry

Atomic Spectroscopy AA/ICP/ICPMS:

Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) Debjani Banerjee Department of Chemical Engineering IIT Kanpur

Simplifying the Process: Automated USP 643 / EP

Simple and Reliable Soil Analysis using the Agilent 7800 ICP-MS with ISIS 3

1. Preliminary qualitative analysis of unknown substances (liquid or solid).

spectrophotometric determination of lead in notable water hv matr; k modification

Automated determination of the uniformity of dosage in quinine sulfate tablets using a fiber optics autosampler

atomic absorption spectroscopy general can be portable and used in-situ preserves sample simpler and less expensive

Corn Syrup Analysis E-51-1 PHOSPHORUS

METHOD 9035 SULFATE (COLORIMETRIC, AUTOMATED, CHLORANILATE)

METHOD 9252A CHLORIDE (TITRIMETRIC, MERCURIC NITRATE)

METHOD 8032A ACRYLAMIDE BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY

Determination of Zinc, Cadmium, Lead and Copper in Effluent Sample

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Water quality Determination of trace elements using atomic absorption spectrometry with graphite furnace

Pharmacopeial Forum Vol. 36(1) [Jan. Feb. 2010] 1

Accurate analysis of neptunium 237 in a uranium matrix, using ICP-QQQ with MS/MS

ASCORBIC ACID METHOD FOR PHOSPHORUS DETERMINATION

Nitrogen, ammonia, colorimetry, salicylate-hypochlorite, automated-segmented flow

PA-DEP 3686, Rev. 1. Light Hydrocarbons in Aqueous Samples via Headspace and Gas Chromatography with Flame Ionization Detection (GC/FID)

Cyanide and sulfide analysis using amperometric detection and Metrosep A Supp /4.0

QAM-I-111 Operation and Calibration of the Conductivity Meter

METHOD 7199 DETERMINATION OF HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM IN DRINKING WATER, GROUNDWATER AND INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER EFFLUENTS BY ION CHROMATOGRAPHY

Determination Of Pb (II), Cr (VI) And Cd (II) Contents In Some Ethiopia Spices After Microwave Digestion Using Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy

Transcription:

Application Note Quality Control Procedures for Graphite Furnace AAS using Avanta Software Introduction With the arrival of quality standards in the analytical laboratory, an ever increasing emphasis is being placed on quality control software and the verification of the results produced. To address these requirements, GBC has developed Avanta software, an automated quality control software package which allows Intelligent Quality Control systems to be activated automatically within an analytical run. This application note introduces three quality control procedures for graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GFAAS) to illustrate their capability to enhance analytical accuracy and precision, whilst allowing improvements in productivity. These automatic procedures are Recovery, Blank Correction and Automatic Dilution. 1. Recovery This provides a useful way to check the validity of an analytical method, particularly where a suitable Certified Reference Material is not available. Avanta software allows the PAL3000 automatic sample loader to automatically spike a sample with a known amount of standard. The software then compares results for the spiked and un-spiked sample and calculates the percentage recovery achieved. The frequency of samples spiked can be set by the operator. This system provides a simple automated facility for the verification of graphite furnace results. The example given in this note is the analysis of lead in river water by GFAAS. 2. Blank Correction In AAS a calibration blank is routinely measured as part of the calibration. However, in some applications this calibration blank is inappropriate for the samples. Whilst it is desirable to keep standards and samples in the same matrix, this is not always practicable in the routine laboratory environment. Acids from different containers can give varying blank values due to contamination or the leaching of metals from containers, and it may not be possible to prepare all samples and standards in a single container. If sample and standard matrices differ, a sample blank correction may be necessary. To enable the analyst to correct for matrix differences between samples and standards, GBC has incorporated Blank Correction into the Avanta software. This facility allows separate blanks to be used for calibration and sample runs, thus eliminating the need for sample and standard matrices to be perfectly matched, as each can be corrected against its own blank value. The example given is the analysis of zinc by GFAAS. The standards and samples in this case were prepared using nitric acid from two different containers. GBC Scientific Application Notes AAS 41

3. Automatic Dilution As increased sample throughput is critical in modern laboratories, Avanta software is designed to transfer much of the sample handling role to the instrument. This allows the analyst to focus on tasks requiring more specialized technical knowledge The Automatic Dilution facility allows the PAL3000 programmable auto loader to automatically dilute samples whenever the absorbance is greater than the highest calibration standard. Avanta software allows the furnace system to perform serial dilutions on a sample. Thus, if the undiluted sample signal is greater than the highest calibration standard, the sample will be diluted by a pre-determined factor. If the diluted sample signal is still greater than the high calibration standard, the sample will be diluted a second time by the same pre-determined factor. This sequence of dilutions continues until a signal within the calibration range is achieved or the sample volume limit of 1 Lis reached. This ensures that samples are measured within the optimum or linear range of the calibration curve. Automatic Dilution typically extends the working concentration range by a factor of 20. Instrumentation A GBC Avanta, Avanta, 932 or 933 AAS, equipped with the unique Ultra-pulse deuterium arc background correction system and System 3000 automated graphite furnace may be used for the analysis. The System 3000 consists of the GF3000 graphite furnace power supply and PAL3000 programmable automatic sample loader. Avanta software provides control of the entire system: spectrometer, furnace and autosampler, allowing the operator to develop furnace methods and to collect and store data. The facility to display real-time colour graphics of simultaneous signal absorbance and background traces and temperature profile traces allows the operator to optimize furnace conditions. Graphics traces for all standards and samples are stored on the computer hard disk, together with all files, allowing recall for method assessment and refinement. Cleaning of Apparatus All containers and apparatus coming into contact with very dilute solutions were thoroughly cleaned before use. Preferably these containers should not have been in contact with high concentration metal solutions. All glassware was soaked for a minimum of 16 hours in 50% nitric acid and then rinsed in 18 M -cm. Reagent Preparation Analytical-reagent grade chemicals were used throughout (Merck Pty Ltd, BHD Chemicals, or equivalent), unless specified. High purity water used for reagent preparation and analysis is from a mixed-bed deionizing unit which feeds a Modulab Research Grade Water System to produce 18M -cm quality water. Working standard solutions for lead and zinc were prepared from 1000 mg/l stock solution by dilution in 0.5% v/v and 1% v/v nitric acid respectively. Standard analytical conditions were used throughout as specified in the GBC Furnace Methods Manual 1 and AA Applications Note Number 22 2 unless otherwise specified. 1. Recovery Two samples of river water (SRO1, SRO2) were analysed using two graphite furnace methods. The temperature program for the furnace is shown in Table 1. Method 1 used no matrix modifier. Method 2 used 5% w/v diammonium hydrogen orthophosphate as a matrix modifier. Both methods utilised a pyrolytic platform in the graphite tube and the measurements were made using peak area. The standards were prepared in 0.5% v/v nitric acid. volume was 5 L and modifier volume was 5 L. Program Step Final Temp ( C) Ramp Time Hold Time Gas Type 1 140 10.0 30.0 argon 2 250 30.0 5.0 argon 3 1000 10.0 10.0 argon 4 1000 1.0 2.0 none 5 1600 0.5 3.5 none Table 1:. Furnace program used for the determination of lead in river water. 42 GBC Scientific Application Notes AAS

The results show significantly higher results for Method 1, with the spike recoveries being unacceptably high. The spike recoveries for Method 2 are within an acceptable range. The high results and recoveries for Method 1 are due to the absence of a matrix modifier, causing some of the analyte in the standards to be lost during the ashing stage. This results in a calibration plot with a smaller gradient (and sensitivity) due to the low absorbance values obtained for the standards. The samples, however, contain dissolved salts. These salts act as a modifier, reducing the loss of analyte from the samples during the ashing stage. These effects cause falsely high sample results and percent recovery values. Analysis Method River Water The use of spike recoveries allows the analyst to determine whether or not a furnace program is suitable for the type of sample being analysed. Although the literature quotes ashing temperatures and suitable matrix modifiers, it may be necessary to determine the maximum ashing temperature and most suitable modifier for each sample type. Also, variation in peak shape between samples due to matrix variation will result in inaccurate results. These processes require the use of spike recovery for method development and for the continual automated monitoring of real samples to obtain accurate results within the day-to-day running of a QC laboratory. 2. Blank Correction Result Added Recover y (%) 1 SRO1 42.39 25.00 91.76 197.5 1 SRO2 195.32 25.00 248.97 214.6 2 SRO1 19.72 25.00 43.31 94.4 2 SRO2 74.15 25.00 100.10 103.8 Table 2:. Results for the determination of lead in two samples of river water, determined against aqueous standards. A working standard containing 5 mg/l zinc was prepared by serial dilution of a commercially available 1000 mg/l zinc standard. The working standard was acidified with very high purity nitric acid (Aristar grade, Merck Pty Ltd, BDH Chemicals) to give a final acid concentration of 1% v/v. Two water samples were prepared so as to contain 0.25 and 0.75 g/l of zinc respectively. The sample solutions were acidified using analytical grade nitric acid to give a final acid concentration of 1% v/v. The two samples were then analysed by GFAAS using a pyrolytically-coated graphite tube, with a single calibration blank prepared from the very high purity acid. The furnace program used is given in Table 3. The samples were analysed a second time using separate blanks for the standards and samples. The standard blank was prepared from very high purity acid and the sample blank was prepared from analytical grade acid. The sample volume was 15 L and the measurement mode was peak height. The results from the two furnace runs are given in Table 4. Program Step Final Temp ( C) Ramp Time Hold Time Gas Type 1 125 10.0 30.0 argon 2 250 30.0 5.0 argon 3 400 10.0 10.0 argon 4 400 1.0 2.0 none 5 1800 1.0 3.0 none 6 2200 1.0 2.0 argon Table 3:. Furnace program used for the determination of zinc in water using a pyrolytically coated graphite furnace tube. The results in Table 4 show that the use of a separate sample blank can be useful where sample and standard preparations vary. The samples were known to contain 0.25 and 0.75 ng/ml of zinc respectively. In the first analysis, where a separate sample blank was not used, the measured concentrations were high, giving a large percentage error in the sample results. This was due to a higher level of zinc in the analytical grade acid than in the very high purity acid. In the second analysis where a separate sample blank was used and corrected for, the sample results were very close to the theoretical values and the percentage error is within an acceptable range. GBC Scientific Application Notes AAS 43

Number Used Blank Theoretical Conc. Measured Conc. % Error 1 No 0.25 0.81 224 2 No 0.75 1.38 84 1 Yes 0.25 0.26 4 concentration which was within the calibration range. Note that for sample 2, two dilutions were necessary to obtain a result. In each case all data is output to the report, regardless of whether or not it was possible to calculate a result. This allows the analyst to readily assess the validity of results and monitor the operation of the system. 2 Yes 0.75 0.74 1.3 Table 4:. Results for the determination of zinc in water samples. Dilution Factor Mean Abs Blank 0.026 %RSD Conc The error incurred in the first analysis will be equivalent to the difference in concentration of zinc between the very high purity acid and the analytical grade acid. To confirm this, the zinc concentration was determined for a 1% v/v solution of the analytical grade acid, using the standard blank and standards prepared in the very high purity acid. The concentration was 0.57 g/l. As expected, the error in the first analysis was due to contamination of the samples by the lower purity analytical grade acid. The use of a separate sample blank will correct this discrepancy. Avanta software allows this sample blank to be programmed into the stored application, and the sample results to be automatically corrected for the sample blank. This removes the need to manually measure sample blanks or calculate the sample results at the end of an automated run. 3. Automatic Dilution The experimental conditions were identical to those used for Blank Correction (# 2 above). However, very high purity nitric acid was used to prepare the calibration blank. Table 5 shows a typical analysis report for the determination of zinc in river water by GFAAS. The calibration range is up to 2 g/l, however sample concentrations up to 14 g/l have been determined without any need for the operator to dilute samples or be present during the analysis run. For samples 1 and 4, as the analyte concentration range for the undiluted sample falls within the calibration range, no sample dilution was carried out. For samples 2 and 3, the analyte concentration in the undiluted samples falls outside the calibration range. In these cases, the sample was automatically diluted by the PAL3000 to achieve an analyte Std 1 0.146 1.04 0.5 Std 2 0.256 0.98 1.0 Std 3 0.347 0.73 1.5 Std 4 0.421 0.71 2.0 1 0.383 0.30 1.7 2 1.133 0.84 Error 2 0.25 0.574 0.61 Error 2 0.05 0.197 0.88 14.4 3 0.761 0.29 Error 3 0.25 0.318 1.40 5.3 4 0.191 0.71 0.7 Table 5:. Typical analysis report for Zn in water by GFAAS using automatic sample dilution. Summary Avanta software enables the analyst to obtain spike recovery data for both method development and routine sample checking, without the need for labour intensive spike preparations. The use of the PAL3000 to prepare standards and spike solutions ensures the maximim utilization of analytical time, whilst maintaining good analytical practice. Avanta software allows a separate sample blank to be run, in addition to the calibration blank. This allows samples and standards to be prepared in different matrices, and for the analyte concentrations determined in the samples to be automatically corrected against their own matched blank. This facility is applicable to both flame and furnace work, and removes the need for manual correction calculations to be performed at the end of a sample run. 44 GBC Scientific Application Notes AAS

The use of automatic sample dilution in graphite furnace analysis allows for the analysis of samples containing a wide range of analyte concentrations, without the need for lengthy sample dilutions. For laboratories needing to analyze samples overnight to maximize instrument use, automatic sample dilution greatly increases the chances of having a full set of sample results the following morning ready for reporting. It is no longer necessary to prepare sample solutions based on your best guess for the concentration range the analyte of interest may fall into. References 1. Graphite Furnace Methods Manual, GBC Scientific Equipment Pty Ltd, Dandenong, Australia. 2. Gill, R., Ashton, P. and Jankowski, S. The Analysis of Lead in Drinking Water, GBC AA Applications Note No. 22, 1992. Avanta software introduces new levels of automation in atomic absorption spectroscopy, allowing laboratories to increase sample throughput, whilst still maintaining confidence that the results are accurate. Avanta s unsurpassed level of automation provides efficient fully automated sample analysis, allowing laboratory staff to be utilised to the maximum on tasks requiring their specialist knowledge. GBC Scientific Application Notes AAS 45