Spherical Harmonics on S 2

Similar documents
Angular Momentum. Classically the orbital angular momentum with respect to a fixed origin is. L = r p. = yp z. L x. zp y L y. = zp x. xpz L z.

Eigenfunctions on the surface of a sphere. In spherical coordinates, the Laplacian is. u = u rr + 2 r u r + 1 r 2. sin 2 (θ) + 1

Spherical Coordinates and Legendre Functions

Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 12 Orbital Angular Momentum and Spherical Harmonics

Representation theory and quantum mechanics tutorial Spin and the hydrogen atom

Summary: angular momentum derivation

Lecture 11 Spin, orbital, and total angular momentum Mechanics. 1 Very brief background. 2 General properties of angular momentum operators

Angular momentum. Quantum mechanics. Orbital angular momentum

Expansion of 1/r potential in Legendre polynomials

Notes on Special Functions

Separation of Variables in Polar and Spherical Coordinates

SOLUTIONS TO SELECTED PROBLEMS FROM ASSIGNMENTS 3, 4

The Spherical Harmonics

Recall that any inner product space V has an associated norm defined by

Curvilinear coordinates

d 1 µ 2 Θ = 0. (4.1) consider first the case of m = 0 where there is no azimuthal dependence on the angle φ.

Quantum Mechanics in 3-Dimensions

BOUNDARY PROBLEMS IN HIGHER DIMENSIONS. kt = X X = λ, and the series solutions have the form (for λ n 0):

The 3 dimensional Schrödinger Equation

Solutions to Laplace s Equations- II

Final Examination Solutions

Connection to Laplacian in spherical coordinates (Chapter 13)

This ODE arises in many physical systems that we shall investigate. + ( + 1)u = 0. (λ + s)x λ + s + ( + 1) a λ. (s + 1)(s + 2) a 0

PHYS 404 Lecture 1: Legendre Functions

Fun With Carbon Monoxide. p. 1/2

More On Carbon Monoxide

4 Power Series Solutions: Frobenius Method

Lecture 4 Quantum mechanics in more than one-dimension

Boundary-Value Problems: Part II

LEGENDRE POLYNOMIALS AND APPLICATIONS. We construct Legendre polynomials and apply them to solve Dirichlet problems in spherical coordinates.

Quantum Mechanics in Three Dimensions

Mathematical Modeling using Partial Differential Equations (PDE s)

Angular Momentum - set 1

Waves on 2 and 3 dimensional domains

Physics 221A Fall 2017 Notes 15 Orbital Angular Momentum and Spherical Harmonics

On an Eigenvalue Problem Involving Legendre Functions by Nicholas J. Rose North Carolina State University

Lecture 4 Quantum mechanics in more than one-dimension

Total Angular Momentum for Hydrogen

which implies that we can take solutions which are simultaneous eigen functions of

Boundary Value Problems in Cylindrical Coordinates

Legendre s Equation. PHYS Southern Illinois University. October 13, 2016

Physics 116C Solutions to the Practice Final Exam Fall The method of Frobenius fails because it works only for Fuchsian equations, of the type

1 Distributions (due January 22, 2009)

Quantum Theory of Angular Momentum and Atomic Structure

Spherical Coordinates

(a) Determine the general solution for φ(ρ) near ρ = 0 for arbitary values E. (b) Show that the regular solution at ρ = 0 has the series expansion

Chapter 5.3: Series solution near an ordinary point

Physics 6303 Lecture 11 September 24, LAST TIME: Cylindrical coordinates, spherical coordinates, and Legendre s equation

Two special equations: Bessel s and Legendre s equations. p Fourier-Bessel and Fourier-Legendre series. p

Lecture IX. Definition 1 A non-singular Sturm 1 -Liouville 2 problem consists of a second order linear differential equation of the form.

Towards a Faster Spherical Harmonic transform

Angular Momentum - set 1

Ch 10.1: Two Point Boundary Value Problems

which arises when we compute the orthogonal projection of a vector y in a subspace with an orthogonal basis. Hence assume that P y = A ij = x j, x i

arxiv: v1 [math.ca] 21 Mar 2014

Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of the Laplacian. Andrew Hassell

Final Examination Solutions

Final Exam May 4, 2016

Computation of the scattering amplitude in the spheroidal coordinates

Legendre Polynomials and Angular Momentum

Linear Algebra II. 7 Inner product spaces. Notes 7 16th December Inner products and orthonormal bases

Slepian functions on the sphere, generalized Gaussian quadrature rule

Quantum Mechanics in Multidimensions

LECTURE 6: LINEAR VECTOR SPACES, BASIS VECTORS AND LINEAR INDEPENDENCE. Prof. N. Harnew University of Oxford MT 2012

Vectors in Function Spaces

Solutions to Laplace s Equation in Cylindrical Coordinates and Numerical solutions. ρ + (1/ρ) 2 V

Angular Momentum Properties

1 r 2 sin 2 θ. This must be the case as we can see by the following argument + L2

Lecture 5: Vector Spaces I - Definitions

Hilbert Space Problems

Before you begin read these instructions carefully:

Spectral Processing. Misha Kazhdan

Lecture Notes for Math 251: ODE and PDE. Lecture 30: 10.1 Two-Point Boundary Value Problems

FFTs in Graphics and Vision. Homogenous Polynomials and Irreducible Representations

Lecture 4.6: Some special orthogonal functions

Homework 11 Solutions. Math 110, Fall 2013.

Review of Electrostatics. Define the gradient operation on a field F = F(x, y, z) by;

Notes on Spherical Harmonics and Linear Representations of Lie Groups

Angular Momentum in Quantum Mechanics

arxiv: v1 [math-ph] 10 Sep 2013

Course Outline. Date Lecture Topic Reading

A Tilt at TILFs. Rod Nillsen University of Wollongong. This talk is dedicated to Gary H. Meisters

EXAM MATHEMATICAL METHODS OF PHYSICS. TRACK ANALYSIS (Chapters I-V). Thursday, June 7th,

1 Commutators (10 pts)

Chapter 3 Transformations

AND NONLINEAR SCIENCE SERIES. Partial Differential. Equations with MATLAB. Matthew P. Coleman. CRC Press J Taylor & Francis Croup

CHAPTER VIII HILBERT SPACES

MATH 423 Linear Algebra II Lecture 33: Diagonalization of normal operators.

QUASI-SEPARATION OF THE BIHARMONIC PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATION

Classical Field Theory: Electrostatics-Magnetostatics

Introduction to Signal Spaces

Equations of linear stellar oscillations

Practice Exam. 2x 1 + 4x 2 + 2x 3 = 4 x 1 + 2x 2 + 3x 3 = 1 2x 1 + 3x 2 + 4x 3 = 5

Diagonalizing Matrices

96 CHAPTER 4. HILBERT SPACES. Spaces of square integrable functions. Take a Cauchy sequence f n in L 2 so that. f n f m 1 (b a) f n f m 2.

( ) = 9φ 1, ( ) = 4φ 2.

Schrödinger equation for central potentials

Notes: Most of the material presented in this chapter is taken from Jackson, Chap. 2, 3, and 4, and Di Bartolo, Chap. 2. 2π nx i a. ( ) = G n.

in terms of the classical frequency, ω = , puts the classical Hamiltonian in the form H = p2 2m + mω2 x 2

Laplace-Beltrami Eigenfunctions for Deformation Invariant Shape Representation

Transcription:

7 August 00 1 Spherical Harmonics on 1 The Laplace-Beltrami Operator In what follows, we describe points on using the parametrization x = cos ϕ sin θ, y = sin ϕ sin θ, z = cos θ, where θ is the colatitude and ϕ is the azimuthal angle. There are coordinate singularities at the north and south poles and along the median ϕ = 0, π. Thus, for a continuous function f(θ,ϕ) to be well defined on, it must satisfy the following boundary conditions: f(θ,ϕ) = f(θ,ϕ + π) f(0,ϕ) and f(π,ϕ) are independent of ϕ. In these coordinates, the invariant area element on is given by = sin θdθdϕ. If f is defined and continuous on, then its integral over is π π f = f(θ,ϕ) sin θdθdϕ. 0 0 The space of functions satisfying f < is denoted by L ( ). If we define the usual inner product and norm on L, { }1 f,g := fḡ and f := f, then it is a Hilbert space. The Laplace Beltrami operator on is given by S = 1 { sin θ } + 1 sin θ θ θ sin θ. This operator places the same rôle as the ordinary Laplacian in Euclidean space, and it satisfies properties similar to its Euclidean counterpart. All of those listed below are established via integration by parts for functions f, g satisfying the necessary boundary conditions. 1. S is selfadjoint: S f,g = f, S g.. Symmetric form: S f,g = ( f ḡ + 1 f θ θ sin θ 3. Non-negativity of S : S f,f = ( f θ ḡ + 1 ) f sin θ ) 0.

The Eigenvalue Problem We now turn to the eigenvalue problem for S. We seek to find all eigenvalues λ for which there is a non-trivial eigenfunction Y such that S Y + λy = 0. From the properties of S we have the following theorem. Theorem.1 The eigenvalues λ are all real, non negative, and the eigenfunctions corresponding to distinct eigenvalues are orthogonal in the inner product of L ( ). In addition, if Y is an eigenfunction corresponding to λ, we have λ = 1 ( Y + 1 Y ) Y S θ sin (1) θ Proof. The expression for λ in (1) follows from properties and 3 for S, with both f and g being taken as Y. This of course implies that the eigenvalues are real and nonnegative. To obtain orthogonality, use property 1 with f = Y 1 and g = Y, where Y 1, Y are eigenfunctions corresponding to λ 1 λ. Then, we have S Y 1,Y = Y 1, S Y λ 1 Y 1,Y = Y 1,λ Y λ 1 Y 1,Y = λ Y 1,Y Now, since the eigenvalues are real, λ = λ. Hence, (λ 1 λ ) Y 1,Y = 0, and, because λ 1 λ, Y 1,Y = 0. From (1), it is easy to see that λ = 0 is in fact an eigenvalue, and that the only eigenfunction corresponding to it is Y = constant. So assume that λ > 0 for the rest of the discussion, and that that Y is an eigenfunction corresponding to λ. The function Y satisfies the boundary conditions described earlier; thus, Y is π-periodic in ϕ. If we fix θ, then we can expand Y (θ,ϕ) in a Fourier series in ϕ, Y (θ,ϕ) = Y m (θ)e imϕ. ()

Apply S to both sides and assume that switching sum and S is permissible. The result is λy = S Y = S Y m (θ)e imϕ ( λ)y m e imϕ = ( { 1 d sin θ dy } ) m m sin θ dθ dθ sin θ Y m e imϕ Comparing Fourier coefficients in the Fourier series for Y and the Fourier series for λy above, we see that { 1 d sin θ dy } m m sin θ dθ dθ sin θ Y m = λy m (3) In addition, we have shown that S (Y m e imϕ ) + λy m e imϕ = 0 (4) In other words, each non-zero component of the Fourier series for Y is also an eigenfunction for S corresponding to λ. (Functions that are identically 0 are not called eigenfunctions.) Consequently, we may use Y m e imϕ as Y in (1). This gives ( 1 Y m e imϕ λ = Y m e imϕ θ + 1 Y m e imϕ ) sin θ 1 1 Y m e imϕ Y m sin θ m 1 Y Y m sin m θ m Y m Y m = m This puts an upper bound on the number of Fourier components in Y. Namely, the largest value of m is the integer l := λ, and also on the dimension of the eigenspace of λ. This is because Y m satisfies the ODE (3), which has at most two linearly independent solutions. In fact, the boundary conditions for functions on allow only one solution for given integer m. 3

Since m itself runs from m = l to m = l, there are only l + 1 solutions. Thus the dimension of the eigenspace corresponding to λ is l+1 = λ +1. We summarize this below. Proposition. For λ > 0, the eigenfunctions S Y + λy are linear combinations of solutions to (4), where Y m is, up to a constant, uniquely determined by (3). Moreover, if l := λ, then m l and the dimension of the eigenspace of λ is l + 1. The next step in solving the eigenvalue problem is to introduce two new operators, ( L ± = e ±iϕ θ ± i cot θ ). (5) For reasons that will be clear later, L + is the called the raising operator and L is the lowering operator. A routine, if tedious, calculation gives that the raising and lowering operators commute with S that is, L ± S = S L ±. Consequently, if S Y = λy, we have that L ± S Y = S L ± Y = λl ± Y. Thus, L ± Y are also eigenfunctions of S, assuming they are not zero. In particular, we can apply them to Y m (θ)e imϕ, ( L ± Ym (θ)e imϕ) ( ) dym = m cot θy m (θ) e i(m±1)ϕ. dθ The right side above is an eigenfunction that has its Fourier series in ϕ consisting of a single term. By what we said above, it must be a multiple of Y m±1 (θ)e i(m±1)ϕ. Now, let m = l and use L +. The result would be an eigenfunction Y l+1 (θ)e i(l+1)ϕ. That is, an eigenfuntion with m = l + 1 > l. The previous proposition implies that the only way this is possible is if ( L + Yl (θ)e ilϕ) ( ) dyl = dθ l cot θy l(θ) e i(l+1)ϕ = 0, dy which implies that Y l satisfies the first order ODE, l l cot θy dθ l (θ) = 0. Solving this is easy; the result is Y l (θ) = C sin l θ, C 0. Plugging this solution back into (3) results in the identity l(l+1)y l = λy l, from which it follows that λ = l(l + 1). The other eigenfunctions for λ = l(l + 1) may be found by recursively applying L to Y l (θ)e ilϕ. Up to normalization, this procedure gives us the eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of S. We have thus proved the following. 4

Theorem.3 The eigenvalues for S Y + λy are of the form λ = l(l + 1), where l = 0, 1,,... Corresponding to each( l, there are l + 1 linearly independent eigenfunctions, Y l,m (θ,ϕ) = L l m sin l θe ilϕ). 3 The Spherical Harmonics Spherical harmonics are eigenfunctions of the Laplace-Beltrami operator S. Theorem.1 tells us that spherical harmonics corresponding to differing values of l and, hence differing values of λ = l(l + 1), are orthogonal. Theorem.3 gives us a way of constructing a basis of spherical harmonics for each fixed l. Because of the factor e imϕ in each of these, they are also orthogonal. By adjusting normalization constants, one can get the all of the spherical harmonics to be an orthonormal set. Theorem 3.1 For l = 0, 1,,..., and m = l,...,l, the functions l + 1 (l m )! Y l,m (θ,φ) := 4π (l + m )! sin m θ P ( m ) l (cos θ)e imϕ form an orthonormal set. Moreover, these are a basis for L ( ). The function P l (x) whose derivative appears above is the l-th order Legendre polynomial. We remark that the normalization for Y l,m is only one of many possible. Also, there are real versions of the spherical harmonics that use sin(mϕ) and cos(mϕ) rather than e imϕ. 5