Lecture Notes 7: The Unruh Effect

Similar documents
763622S ADVANCED QUANTUM MECHANICS Solution Set 1 Spring c n a n. c n 2 = 1.

Lecture 6/7 (February 10/12, 2014) DIRAC EQUATION. The non-relativistic Schrödinger equation was obtained by noting that the Hamiltonian 2

Causal Diamonds. M. Aghili, L. Bombelli, B. Pilgrim

Homework & Solution. Contributors. Prof. Lee, Hyun Min. Particle Physics Winter School. Park, Ye

1 Matrix representations of canonical matrices

14 The Postulates of Quantum mechanics

Chapter Twelve. Integration. We now turn our attention to the idea of an integral in dimensions higher than one. Consider a real-valued function f : D

Lagrangian Field Theory

Salmon: Lectures on partial differential equations. Consider the general linear, second-order PDE in the form. ,x 2

Rate of Absorption and Stimulated Emission

Lecture 12: Discrete Laplacian

Mechanics Physics 151

Advanced Quantum Mechanics

Inner Product. Euclidean Space. Orthonormal Basis. Orthogonal

C/CS/Phy191 Problem Set 3 Solutions Out: Oct 1, 2008., where ( 00. ), so the overall state of the system is ) ( ( ( ( 00 ± 11 ), Φ ± = 1

12. The Hamilton-Jacobi Equation Michael Fowler

Prof. Dr. I. Nasser Phys 630, T Aug-15 One_dimensional_Ising_Model

Physics 181. Particle Systems

Week3, Chapter 4. Position and Displacement. Motion in Two Dimensions. Instantaneous Velocity. Average Velocity

Mechanics Physics 151

Affine transformations and convexity

8.592J: Solutions for Assignment 7 Spring 2005

More metrics on cartesian products

A how to guide to second quantization method.

8.6 The Complex Number System

Linear Approximation with Regularization and Moving Least Squares

U.C. Berkeley CS294: Beyond Worst-Case Analysis Luca Trevisan September 5, 2017

The non-negativity of probabilities and the collapse of state

V. Electrostatics. Lecture 25: Diffuse double layer structure

Quantum Mechanics I - Session 4

Section 8.3 Polar Form of Complex Numbers

Robert Eisberg Second edition CH 09 Multielectron atoms ground states and x-ray excitations

Mathematical Preparations

The Feynman path integral

Classical Field Theory

Temperature. Chapter Heat Engine

EPR Paradox and the Physical Meaning of an Experiment in Quantum Mechanics. Vesselin C. Noninski

The photon model and equations are derived through timedomain mutual energy current

Advanced Circuits Topics - Part 1 by Dr. Colton (Fall 2017)

3.1 Expectation of Functions of Several Random Variables. )' be a k-dimensional discrete or continuous random vector, with joint PMF p (, E X E X1 E X

The equation of motion of a dynamical system is given by a set of differential equations. That is (1)

Physics 114 Exam 2 Spring Name:

Lecture 20: Noether s Theorem

PHYS 705: Classical Mechanics. Calculus of Variations II

U.C. Berkeley CS294: Spectral Methods and Expanders Handout 8 Luca Trevisan February 17, 2016

Limited Dependent Variables

Physics 5153 Classical Mechanics. Principle of Virtual Work-1

Moments of Inertia. and reminds us of the analogous equation for linear momentum p= mv, which is of the form. The kinetic energy of the body is.

Chapter 5. Solution of System of Linear Equations. Module No. 6. Solution of Inconsistent and Ill Conditioned Systems

8.323 Relativistic Quantum Field Theory I

Spin-rotation coupling of the angularly accelerated rigid body

CHAPTER 5: Lie Differentiation and Angular Momentum

Group Analysis of Ordinary Differential Equations of the Order n>2

THE VIBRATIONS OF MOLECULES II THE CARBON DIOXIDE MOLECULE Student Instructions

10. Canonical Transformations Michael Fowler

Physics 5153 Classical Mechanics. D Alembert s Principle and The Lagrangian-1

Physics 207: Lecture 20. Today s Agenda Homework for Monday

Lecture 3: Probability Distributions

Math1110 (Spring 2009) Prelim 3 - Solutions

Three views of mechanics

Bezier curves. Michael S. Floater. August 25, These notes provide an introduction to Bezier curves. i=0

Density matrix. c α (t)φ α (q)

Snce h( q^; q) = hq ~ and h( p^ ; p) = hp, one can wrte ~ h hq hp = hq ~hp ~ (7) the uncertanty relaton for an arbtrary state. The states that mnmze t

Chapter 4 The Wave Equation

Stanford University CS359G: Graph Partitioning and Expanders Handout 4 Luca Trevisan January 13, 2011

Physics 4B. Question and 3 tie (clockwise), then 2 and 5 tie (zero), then 4 and 6 tie (counterclockwise) B i. ( T / s) = 1.74 V.

Physics 207: Lecture 27. Announcements

Canonical transformations

5.04, Principles of Inorganic Chemistry II MIT Department of Chemistry Lecture 32: Vibrational Spectroscopy and the IR

Edge Isoperimetric Inequalities

ACTM State Calculus Competition Saturday April 30, 2011

ON MECHANICS WITH VARIABLE NONCOMMUTATIVITY

= 1.23 m/s 2 [W] Required: t. Solution:!t = = 17 m/s [W]! m/s [W] (two extra digits carried) = 2.1 m/s [W]

n α j x j = 0 j=1 has a nontrivial solution. Here A is the n k matrix whose jth column is the vector for all t j=0

Representation theory and quantum mechanics tutorial Representation theory and quantum conservation laws

CONDUCTORS AND INSULATORS

Case A. P k = Ni ( 2L i k 1 ) + (# big cells) 10d 2 P k.

ψ = i c i u i c i a i b i u i = i b 0 0 b 0 0

Homework Assignment 3 Due in class, Thursday October 15

Georgia Tech PHYS 6124 Mathematical Methods of Physics I

ELASTIC WAVE PROPAGATION IN A CONTINUOUS MEDIUM

10.34 Fall 2015 Metropolis Monte Carlo Algorithm

Poisson brackets and canonical transformations

Lecture 7: Boltzmann distribution & Thermodynamics of mixing

CHAPTER 14 GENERAL PERTURBATION THEORY

CHALMERS, GÖTEBORGS UNIVERSITET. SOLUTIONS to RE-EXAM for ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS. COURSE CODES: FFR 135, FIM 720 GU, PhD

Difference Equations

Dr. Shalabh Department of Mathematics and Statistics Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur

HW #6, due Oct Toy Dirac Model, Wick s theorem, LSZ reduction formula. Consider the following quantum mechanics Lagrangian,

Lectures - Week 4 Matrix norms, Conditioning, Vector Spaces, Linear Independence, Spanning sets and Basis, Null space and Range of a Matrix

Module 14: THE INTEGRAL Exploring Calculus

Professor Terje Haukaas University of British Columbia, Vancouver The Q4 Element

Frequency dependence of the permittivity

Ph 219a/CS 219a. Exercises Due: Wednesday 23 October 2013

Differentiating Gaussian Processes

Workshop: Approximating energies and wave functions Quantum aspects of physical chemistry

Mathematics Intersection of Lines

Generalized Linear Methods

10.40 Appendix Connection to Thermodynamics and Derivation of Boltzmann Distribution

COS 521: Advanced Algorithms Game Theory and Linear Programming

Transcription:

Quantum Feld Theory for Leg Spnners 17/1/11 Lecture Notes 7: The Unruh Effect Lecturer: Prakash Panangaden Scrbe: Shane Mansfeld 1 Defnng the Vacuum Recall from the last lecture that choosng a complex structure defnes the postve and negatve frequency solutons of your theory. Ths choce s not unque and one needs some nput from the physcs to pck out the rght complex structure. We consder what happens when two observers have dfferent notons of postve and negatve energy frequences. Suppose we have two complete, orthonormal sets of of complex solutons to the Klen-Gordon equaton, {f } and {q }. By orthonormal we mean that the unon of the f and ther complex conugates satsfy the followng equatons f, f = f, f = δ. So the Klen-Gordon nner product only behaves lke an nner product when restrcted to postve frequency solutons. By complete we mean that they form a bass n the complex vector space of all solutons. If ˆφ(x s our feld operator, then the creaton and annhlaton operators wth respect to the f-bass are defned by ˆφ(x = ( â f + â f, and the vacuum s defned as the unque state that s klled by all the annhlaton operators: other: â =. Snce we are dealng wth complete sets, we can wrte the f and g n terms of each So, for example, α = g, f. g = (α f + β f f = ( α g + β g g = ( α f + β f f = ( α g + β g. 7-1

We could equally well expand the feld operator n the g-bass. Then we have (ˆb g + ˆb g, ˆφ(x = for some other creaton and annhlators ˆb and ˆb, and we also have another vacuum defned by ˆb =. The queston we are nterested n answerng s: what does a one vacuum look lke n the other bass? 2 Bogoloubov Transformatons It s a routne calculaton to fnd that â = [ ] α ˆb + β ˆb â = [ ] αˆb + β ˆb ˆb = [ ] α ˆb + β ˆb ˆb = ] [α ˆb + β ˆb. These are called the Bogolubov transformatons. Now we have two number operators: ˆN = â â ˆN = ˆb ˆb. So we can take one vacuum and wth t calculate the expectaton value of the other number operator: ˆN = β 2. We see that under the Bogoloubov transformatons the annhlaton operators pck up a creaton part, and the coeffcents gve rse to the non-zero rght-hand sde here. It s ths mxng of the creaton and annhlaton operators that s responsble for partcle creaton. The Boboloubov transformaton formalsm was frst used n order to descrbe partcle by Leonard Parker n the 196s. 3 Rndler Spacetme Recall that a vector feld s a Kllng feld f the Le dervatve of the metrc along that vector feld vanshes. In Mnkowsk spacetme we have the boost Kllng feld: t z + z t. The ntegral curves of ths Kllng feld are tmelke n the rght and left Rndler wedges (RRW and LRW, see fgure 1. So n these regons of the spacetme we could use these 7-2

Fgure 1: Worldlnes of unformly accelerated observers. curves to defne a tme coordnate. They curves are curves of constant acceleraton, so for a unformly acceleratng observer these are the natural tme coodnates. An acceleratng observer wll see the dagonals of the fgure as horzons. So for such an observer, the Rndler wedge s hs natural home. Note that each of the left and rght wedges s a globally hyperbolc statc spacetme n ts own rght. The coordnates of a unformly accelerated observer are the Rndler coordnates (ρ, η, x, y. These are related to the Mnkowsk coordnates (t, z, x, y by the transformatons t = ρ snh η, z = ρ cosh η. The lne element of the Rndler spacetme s ds 2 = ρ 2 dη dρ 2 dx 2 dy 2. Lnes of constant acceleraton are lnes of constant ρ, and the value of the acceleraton s ρ 1. In terms of the scaled coordnates (τ, η, x, y, where the acceleraton a s factored out: ρ = a 1 e aξ, η = aτ. ξ = corresponds to acceleraton a. We wll use τ to defne postve and negatve frequency, and thus the vacuum for an acceleratng observer. We wll consder the dfference between the vacuum of Mnkowsk coordnates, and that of Rndler coordnates. It turns out that, to the accelerated observer, the Mnkowsk background looks lke a thermal bath: ths s what s known as the Unruh effect or the 7-3

Fullng-Daves-Unruh effect. We derve ths for a two-dmensonal spacetme wth massless felds. Ths s a toy demonstraton of the Unruh effect. It holds true n the four dmensonal massve case, but the analyss s qute a bt longer. 4 Toy Demonstraton of the Unruh Effect We wrte the momentum operator n terms of rght-gong and left-gong parts; each wth ts own creaton and annhlaton operators. ˆΦ(t, z = dk 4πk (ˆb k e k(t z + ˆb k e k(t+z + ˆb k e k(t z + ˆb k e k(t+z. When we change coordnates from (t, z to (τ, ξ we get ( t 2 z 2 φ = ( τ 2 ξ 2 φ =. Ths s due to conformal nvarance. It does not happen for four dmensonal massve felds, and for that reason they are a bt more dffcult to deal wth. If we use u = τ + ξ v = τ ξ U = t + z V = τ + ξ then we can wrte the momentum n the RRW n terms of the other coordnates as dk ˆΦ ω (v = (α ωk R e kv b? + βωk R ekv b?, 4πk and smlarly for the LRW. To calculate αωk R and βr ωk s ust an ntegraton now. For example, πω αωk R = e ( 2a a ω ( 2π a Γ 1 ω. ωk k a The thng to note here s the exponental. It s exactly the form you get n the Boltzmann dstrbuton for blackbody radaton. so f From ˆb M = we have ω â R f = f(ω â R ω dω, ( â R ω e πω a âr ω M = ; where ω then M â R f âr f M = dω f(ω 2 e 2πω/a 1, whch s the spectrum of a black body wth temperature a. 7-4 f(ω dω = 1,

Fgure 2: The Unruh-Wald detector. The two-state quantum mechancal system s coupled to a Klen-Gordon feld, and has a transton probablty due to ths feld. In ths pcture, a partcle s the effect of a detector nteractng wth a feld. 5 The Rndler Observer An acceleratng observer would use Rndler coordnates. Unruh and Wald consdered what would happen f an acceleratng observer had a partcle detector. By a detector they meant a smple two-state quantum mechancal system (states,, coupled to a Klen-Gordon feld (see fgure 2. Absorbng a partcle from the feld, the quantum system could change state, n, n 1. They showed that such a state, f accelerated n Mnkowsk space, wll detect a partcle wth probablty gven by the black body spectrum. Ths rases another ssue: how a Mnkowsk observer nterprets the absorpton of a Rndler partcle. Unruh and Wald showed that the Mnkowsk observer nterprets ths as the emsson of a Mnkowsk partcle. The problem now s: who thnks that the energy of the feld has ncreased or decreased? In fact, both observers wll agree that the energy n the feld has ncreased. It seems counter-ntutve n that the Rndler observer has absorbed a partcle from the feld, and yet the feld energy goes up. In general, however, when a partcle s absorbed from a heat bath, the energy goes up. The followng toy calculaton s a smple demonstraton of the fact. 7-5

Example Consder the state + 1 n n where n >> 1 s the number of quanta, each havng energy E. The expectaton value of energy s E E. If, however, you detect a partcle, then Energy (n 1E >> E. 6 Rndler Vacuum? An nterestng queston to consder s whether a Rndler observer can even prepare a vacuum. Of course, f not, then the observer can t prepare a pure state of any knd. Ths s a problem because n quantum nformaton theory, all of our protocols begn wth preparng pure states. If the Rndler vacuum state can be prepared, then whch has lower energy? Surely observers should agree on the orderng of energy levels, f not on the scalng. It has been calculated that the vacuum energy of the Rndler spacetme dverges as the horzons are approached. Ths may be taken as an ndcaton that the Rndler vacuum s unphyscal. However, much remans to be understood. 7-6