Product differentiation

Similar documents
HOTELLING LOCATION MODEL

Competitive and Cooperative Inventory Policies in a Two-Stage Supply-Chain

Economic Growth & Development: Part 4 Vertical Innovation Models. By Kiminori Matsuyama. Updated on , 11:01:54 AM

T. J. HOLMES AND T. J. KEHOE INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND PAYMENTS THEORY FALL 2011 EXAMINATION

Lars Nesheim. 17 January Last lecture solved the consumer choice problem.

Multi-homing, Product Differentiation and Competition

Delivered versus Mill Nonlinear Pricing in Free Entry Markets

ENERGY REGULATORY ECONOMICS

Documentos de Trabalho em Economia Working Papers in Economics

Explaining Total Factor Productivity. Ulrich Kohli University of Geneva December 2015

Unit 6. Firm behaviour and market structure: perfect competition

20. Applications of the Genetic-Drift Model

Intermediate Macro In-Class Problems

15. Vector Valued Functions

ANSWERS TO EVEN NUMBERED EXERCISES IN CHAPTER 6 SECTION 6.1: LIFE CYCLE CONSUMPTION AND WEALTH T 1. . Let ct. ) is a strictly concave function of c

Problem Set #1 - Answers

Traveling Waves. Chapter Introduction

Lecture 2-1 Kinematics in One Dimension Displacement, Velocity and Acceleration Everything in the world is moving. Nothing stays still.

1. VELOCITY AND ACCELERATION

Macroeconomic Theory Ph.D. Qualifying Examination Fall 2005 ANSWER EACH PART IN A SEPARATE BLUE BOOK. PART ONE: ANSWER IN BOOK 1 WEIGHT 1/3

EXERCISES FOR SECTION 1.5

IB Physics Kinematics Worksheet

KINEMATICS IN ONE DIMENSION

Ground Rules. PC1221 Fundamentals of Physics I. Kinematics. Position. Lectures 3 and 4 Motion in One Dimension. A/Prof Tay Seng Chuan

Why Competition from a Multi-Channel E-Tailer Does Not Always Benefit Consumers

Displacement ( x) x x x

Problem Set 5. Graduate Macro II, Spring 2017 The University of Notre Dame Professor Sims

Final Exam. Tuesday, December hours

Inventory Analysis and Management. Multi-Period Stochastic Models: Optimality of (s, S) Policy for K-Convex Objective Functions

Economics 8105 Macroeconomic Theory Recitation 6

Essential Microeconomics : OPTIMAL CONTROL 1. Consider the following class of optimization problems

Lecture Notes 3: Quantitative Analysis in DSGE Models: New Keynesian Model

Final Exam Advanced Macroeconomics I

Bidding in sequential electricity markets: The Nordic case

Predator - Prey Model Trajectories and the nonlinear conservation law

Optima and Equilibria for Traffic Flow on a Network

Name: Total Points: Multiple choice questions [120 points]

Instructor: Barry McQuarrie Page 1 of 5

A First Course on Kinetics and Reaction Engineering. Class 19 on Unit 18

Today: Graphing. Note: I hope this joke will be funnier (or at least make you roll your eyes and say ugh ) after class. v (miles per hour ) Time

Math 111 Midterm I, Lecture A, version 1 -- Solutions January 30 th, 2007

Chapter 1 Electric Circuit Variables

Long term versus short term regulation: A model of investment behaviors. in the Telecommunications Sector

Hotelling Competition and Political Di erentiation with more than two Newspapers

5.1 - Logarithms and Their Properties

Physics for Scientists & Engineers 2

Problem 1 / 25 Problem 2 / 20 Problem 3 / 10 Problem 4 / 15 Problem 5 / 30 TOTAL / 100

2.7. Some common engineering functions. Introduction. Prerequisites. Learning Outcomes

Expert Advice for Amateurs

CENTRALIZED VERSUS DECENTRALIZED PRODUCTION PLANNING IN SUPPLY CHAINS

. Now define y j = log x j, and solve the iteration.

A Dynamic Model of Economic Fluctuations

Seminar 4: Hotelling 2

Random Processes 1/24

Reserves measures have an economic component eg. what could be extracted at current prices?

Lecture 2D: Rank-Size Rule

Quality Choice and Advertising Regulation in Broadcasting Markets

MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION IN A DSGE MODEL: PART II OCTOBER 4, 2011 BUILDING THE EQUILIBRIUM. p = 1. Dixit-Stiglitz Model

Lecture 8. Lecturer: Finn R. Førsund. Transmission 1

Kinematics Vocabulary. Kinematics and One Dimensional Motion. Position. Coordinate System in One Dimension. Kinema means movement 8.

On Measuring Pro-Poor Growth. 1. On Various Ways of Measuring Pro-Poor Growth: A Short Review of the Literature

International Journal of Computer Science Trends and Technology (IJCST) Volume 3 Issue 6, Nov-Dec 2015

Solution: b All the terms must have the dimension of acceleration. We see that, indeed, each term has the units of acceleration

1. Consider a pure-exchange economy with stochastic endowments. The state of the economy

Lecture 2D: Rank-Size Rule

Math 2142 Exam 1 Review Problems. x 2 + f (0) 3! for the 3rd Taylor polynomial at x = 0. To calculate the various quantities:

- Graphing: Position Velocity. Acceleration

SPH3U: Projectiles. Recorder: Manager: Speaker:

Introduction to choice over time

Lab #2: Kinematics in 1-Dimension

EE 435. Lecture 31. Absolute and Relative Accuracy DAC Design. The String DAC

Math 333 Problem Set #2 Solution 14 February 2003

Chapter 7: Solving Trig Equations

AP Calculus BC 2004 Free-Response Questions Form B

Online Appendix for "Customer Recognition in. Experience versus Inspection Good Markets"

Cooperative Ph.D. Program in School of Economic Sciences and Finance QUALIFYING EXAMINATION IN MACROECONOMICS. August 8, :45 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.

Applying Genetic Algorithms for Inventory Lot-Sizing Problem with Supplier Selection under Storage Capacity Constraints

The Brock-Mirman Stochastic Growth Model

On Customized Goods, Standard Goods, and Competition

INCENTIVE COMPATIBILITY AND MECHANISM DESIGN

Globalization and Synchronization of Innovation Cycles

3.1.3 INTRODUCTION TO DYNAMIC OPTIMIZATION: DISCRETE TIME PROBLEMS. A. The Hamiltonian and First-Order Conditions in a Finite Time Horizon

Exam I. Name. Answer: a. W B > W A if the volume of the ice cubes is greater than the volume of the water.

Plan for Today & Next time (B) Machine Learning Theory. 2-Player Zero-Sum games. Game Theory terminolgy. Minimax-optimal strategies

x(m) t(sec ) Homework #2. Ph 231 Introductory Physics, Sp-03 Page 1 of 4

1 Answers to Final Exam, ECN 200E, Spring

Math Week 14 April 16-20: sections first order systems of linear differential equations; 7.4 mass-spring systems.

ACE 562 Fall Lecture 4: Simple Linear Regression Model: Specification and Estimation. by Professor Scott H. Irwin

5. Stochastic processes (1)

Inventory Control of Perishable Items in a Two-Echelon Supply Chain

t dt t SCLP Bellman (1953) CLP (Dantzig, Tyndall, Grinold, Perold, Anstreicher 60's-80's) Anderson (1978) SCLP

Module 2 F c i k c s la l w a s o s f dif di fusi s o i n

Constant Acceleration

Phys1112: DC and RC circuits

Guest Lectures for Dr. MacFarlane s EE3350 Part Deux

Reading from Young & Freedman: For this topic, read sections 25.4 & 25.5, the introduction to chapter 26 and sections 26.1 to 26.2 & 26.4.

THE WAVE EQUATION. part hand-in for week 9 b. Any dilation v(x, t) = u(λx, λt) of u(x, t) is also a solution (where λ is constant).

1 Solutions to selected problems

Costly location in Hotelling duopoly

Transcription:

differeniaion Horizonal differeniaion Deparmen of Economics, Universiy of Oslo ECON480 Spring 010 Las modified: 010.0.16 The exen of he marke Differen producs or differeniaed varians of he same produc Quesions Ouline How far does he marke exend? Which firms compee wih each oher? Wha is an indusry? s are no homogeneous Excepions: Gasoline, elecriciy Sill, some producs are more equal o each oher han o oher producs in he economy. These producs consiue an indusry wih differeniaed producs. Bu where do we draw he line? Examples: beer vs. soda? soda vs. milk? beer vs. milk?

Two kinds of produc differeniaion Quesions Ouline 1 Horizonal differeniaion Ex: Differen locaion of sores Differen ime slos for airline deparures Consumers differ in heir preferences over he produc s characerisics (as color, ase, locaion of oule). The opimal choice for idenical s depends on consumer preferences. Covered here. Verical differeniaion Ex: Cars of differen qualiy and in differen segmens s differ in some characerisic (called qualiy) in which all consumers agree wha is bes. For equal s, all prefer he varian wih higher qualiy. Theopimalchoiceishesameforeveryone. For differen s, consumer make differen choice (e.g. due o differences in income). Covered nex ime. Horizonal produc differeniaion Posiive quesions Quesions Ouline Pricing behavior for given number of firms and given locaions. How does produc differeniaion influence he firms compeiion? Locaion choice for given number of firms. How do firms differeniae heir producs o weaken compeiion? Enry decisions.

Horizonal produc differeniaion Normaive quesions Quesions Ouline Is he produc variaion oo large in equilibrium? Too much produc differeniaion? Are here oo many varians in equilibrium? Too many firms ener? Ouline Quesions Ouline wih differeniaed producs Spaial compeiion The linear ciy The circular ciy and informaional produc differeniaion Informaive? Persuasive?

wih differeniaed producs (1) Srucure: (1) Prices se () Demand deermines quaniies Firms 1 and have consan uni cos c 1 and c and se s p 1 and p simulaneously. Sales are given by D i (p i, p j ), which is he coninuous demand funcion for firm i. max p i (p i c i )D i (p i, p j ) Why does a coninuous demand funcion mean ha producs are differeniaed? Resul Le c 1 = c = c. If D 1 (p 1, p ) > 0 when p 1 min{c, p } and D (p, p 1 ) > 0 when p min{c, p 1 },heninanynash equilibrium (p1, p ) we have ha (p 1, p ) (c, c). wih differeniaed producs () Proof. To be shown: (p 1, p ) is no a Nash equilibrium if min{p 1, p } c. Case 1: min{p 1, p } < c. A leas one firm i has negaive profi. Non-negaive profi by seing p i c. Case : min{p 1, p } = c. If p i = c and p j c, henby assumpion D i (p i, p j ) > 0, and firm i s profi is zero. Since D i (, ) is coninuous, firm i can aain posiive profi by seing p i = c + ε for ε>0 sufficienly small. Hence, differeniaed producs solve he paradox, in he sense ha i leads o exceeding marginal cos.

The linear ciy wih linear ransporaion coss (1) Linear ransp. coss Quadraic ransp. coss Following Hoelling (199), consider a linear ciy of lengh 1 wih consumers uniformly disribued along his inerval. Also, assume ha firm 1 is locaed a 0 and firm is locaed a 1. For a consumer locaed a x ( [0, 1]) he cos o buy from firm 1isp 1 + x and he cos o buy from firm is p + (1 x). Every consumer buys one uni from a firm wih lowes cos. Indifferen consumer x: p 1 + x = p + (1 x), which implies x = p p 1 + D i (p i, p j )= and 1 x = p 1 p + 1 if p i p j p j p i + if p i (p j, p j + ) 0 if p i p j + The linear ciy wih linear ransporaion coss () Linear ransp. coss Quadraic ransp. coss max (p i c) p j p i + p i [p j,p j +] FOC if p i (p j, p j + ): p j + c + p i =0 p i = p j if p j c +3 p j +c+ if p j (c, c +3) p j + if p j c Unique Nash equilibrium, (p1 c, pc )saisfies: p1 c = pc = c +. Hence, exceeds c. Do firms maximize produc differeniae o relax compeiion? Problemaic o discuss choice of produc differeniaion wih linear ransporaion coss. Why? Wha produc differeniaion maximizes welfare?

The linear ciy wih quadraic ransporaion coss () Linear ransp. coss Quadraic ransp. coss Assume ha firm 1 is locaed a a and firm is locaed a 1 b, where 0 a < 1 b 1. For a consumer locaed a x ( [0, 1]) he cos o buy from firm 1isp 1 + x and he cos o buy from firm is p + (1 x). Srucure: (1) Firms choose locaions a and b () Given locaions, firms choose s p 1 and p (3) Demand deermines quaniies Maximal produc differeniaion o weaken compeiion: a =0andb =0 Less produc differeniaion would have maximized welfare: a = 1 4 and b = 1 4 Wha abou enry? Beer o analyze in he circular ciy. The circular ciy and firm enry Presenaion of enry Socially op. enry Srucure: (1) Firms choose wheher o ener; locae symmerically around a circle (lengh 1) () Given enry and locaions, firms choose s; we assume maximal differeniaion (3) Demand deermines quaniies f : Fixed cos of enry (p i c)d i f :Firmi s (ex ane) profi Assume linear ransporaion coss. Ask: How many firms will ener?

The circular ciy and firm enry Demand for i s produc, given ha he compeiors is p. Assume ha firm i only compees wih his neares compeiors. Indifferen consumer x: p i + x = p + ( 1 n x), which implies: enry Socially op. enry D i (p i, p j )= x = p p i + n max(p i c) p p i + n p i f FOC if p i (p n, p j + n ): p + c + n p i =0 Find he symmeric equilibrium by seing p i = p: p = c + n The profi margin (p c) is reduced if greaer enry (larger n) The circular ciy and firm enry enry enry Socially op. enry How many firms will ener? Demand for each: 1 n maximize n subjec o (p c) 1 n f = n f 0 n c f and n c +1> f p c c + f Higher ranspor coss (larger ) weakens compeiion, increases, and leads o greaer enry (larger n). In equilibrium: Toal cos of enry: Toal ransporaion cos: f f = f / 4 f = 4 1 f Toal cos: 5 4 f

The circular ciy and firm enry Socially opimal enry enry Socially op. enry Consumpion is given (p > c does no lead o efficiency loss). Hence, social planner wishes o minimize he sum of enry coss and ransporaion coss: [ ( 1 n [ ] min nf + n xdx =min nf + n 0 n 4n n = 1 f = 1 nc Too many firms in equilibrium Privae moivaion for enry: Business sealing Social moivaion for enry: Saving ransporaion coss In social opimum: Toal cos of enry: 1 Toal ransporaion cos: / (4 1 Toal cos: f f f = 1 f ) = 1 f f The circular ciy and firm enry Discussion enry Socially op. enry Maximal produc differeniaion is assumed. Can his be endogenized hrough a 3 sage game Economides (1984) Simulaneous enry is assumed Wha abou sequenial enry? Presco & Visscher (1977) Each firm produces only one brand (one produc varian) Wha if each firm can produce muliple brands? Then hey can aach heir compeiors from more han one direcion. Leading o muli-brand monopoly raher han one-brand oligopoly?

Maximal or minimal differeniaion? Argumens for less differeniaion enry Socially op. enry Locaing where demand is. Posiive exernaliies beween firms. Ex.: A paricular ype of sores is locaed in he same sree. The consumers know where o go and can compare more easily producs ha are differeniaed from oher characerisics han locaion. No compeiion (Hoelling, 199). Ex.: Commercial TV companies wishing o maximize heir audience, ransmi similar programs in he same ime slo. Poliical paries approach he cener (median voer). Relaed o he posiive demand effec. Informaional produc differeniaion Model Informaive: focus here Persuasive: shifing consumers preferences Consider a linear ciy of lengh 1 wih consumers uniformly disribued along his inerval. Also, assume ha firm 1 is locaeda0andfirmislocaeda1. For a consumer locaed a x ( [0, 1]) he cos o buy from firm 1isp 1 + x if informed of firm 1 and he cos o buy from firm is p + (1 x) ifinformedoffirm.aconsumerbecomes informed of firm i by receiving adverising from firm i. Fracion of consumers receiving adverising from firm i: ϕ i coss: A i = A(ϕ i )= a ϕ i

Model of informaional produc differeniaion Model Poenial marke for firm 1: ϕ 1 Ou of hese consumers, afracion1 ϕ have no received informaion from firm The res, a fracion [ ϕ ou of ϕ 1 (, know abou boh firms D 1 = ϕ 1 (1 ϕ )+ϕ 1 + p p 1 Firms simulaneously & independenly choose adverising & [ ( max(p 1 c)ϕ 1 (1 ϕ )+ϕ 1 p 1,ϕ 1 + p p 1 a ϕ 1 FOCs [ ( p 1 : ϕ 1 (1 ϕ )+ϕ 1 + p p 1 (p1 c) ϕ 1ϕ =0 p 1 = p +c + ϕ ϕ 1 : (p 1 c) [ ( (1 ϕ )+ϕ 1 + p p 1 aϕ1 =0 ϕ 1 = p [ ( 1 c a (1 ϕ )+ϕ 1 + p p 1 Model Find he symmeric equilibrium by seing p 1 = p = p and ϕ 1 = ϕ = ϕ: p = p+c + ϕ a p = c + ( ϕ 1) = c + = c + a ϕ = p c [ a (1 ϕ)+ ϕ] = a( ϕ 1)( 1 ϕ ) ϕ = q (which requires a) 1+ a Π= a ϕ a = ( 1+ q ) a p a > 0, ϕ a < 0, Π > 0, Π a > 0. An increase in adverising coss increases firms profis A direc negaive effec. An indirec posiive effec: a ϕ p