Potential Use of beta-eff and other Benchmarks for Adjustment

Similar documents
Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis of the k eff and b eff for the ICSBEP and IRPhE Benchmarks

Preliminary Uncertainty Analysis at ANL

PIA: Progressive Incremental Adjustment

Sensitivity Computation with Monte Carlo Methods

A.BIDAUD, I. KODELI, V.MASTRANGELO, E.SARTORI

B. Morillon, L. Leal?, G. Noguere y, P. Romain, H. Duarte. April U, 238 U and 239 Pu JEFF-3.3T1 evaluations

Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis Methodologies for Fast Reactor Physics and Design at JAEA

Benchmark of ENDF/B-VII.1 and JENDL-4.0 on Reflector Effects

PIA and REWIND: Two New Methodologies for Cross Section Adjustment. G. Palmiotti and M. Salvatores

A-priori and a-posteriori covariance data in nuclear cross section adjustments: issues and challenges

Convergence Analysis and Criterion for Data Assimilation with Sensitivities from Monte Carlo Neutron Transport Codes

Methods and Issues for the Combined Use of Integral Experiments and Covariance Data: Results of a NEA International Collaborative Study

Perturbation/sensitivity calculations with Serpent

Investigation of Nuclear Data Accuracy for the Accelerator- Driven System with Minor Actinide Fuel

VERIFICATION OFENDF/B-VII.0, ENDF/B-VII.1 AND JENDL-4.0 NUCLEAR DATA LIBRARIES FOR CRITICALITY CALCULATIONS USING NEA/NSC BENCHMARKS

Uncertainty quantification using SCALE 6.2 package and GPT techniques implemented in Serpent 2

WPEC Sub group 34 Coordinated evaluation of 239 Pu in the resonance region

Perspective on CIELO. Michael Dunn Nuclear Data & Criticality Safety Group Leader. NEMEA-7 / CIELO Workshop Geel, Belgium November 5-8, 2013

Invited. ENDF/B-VII data testing with ICSBEP benchmarks. 1 Introduction. 2 Discussion

SG39 Meeting May 16-17, Update on Continuous Energy Cross Section Adjustment. UC Berkeley / INL collaboration

SINBAD Benchmark Database and FNS/JAEA Liquid Oxygen TOF Experiment Analysis. I. Kodeli Jožef Stefan Institute Ljubljana, Slovenia

Presentation for the CIELO Meeting of the NEA 9-11 May 2016 Paris, France. The Chinese work on 56 Fe

Nuclear data sensitivity and uncertainty assessment of sodium voiding reactivity coefficients of an ASTRID-like Sodium Fast Reactor

NUCLEAR DATA VERIFICATION USING GALILEE AND TRIPOLI-4

Challenges in nuclear data evaluation of actinide nuclei

Sensitivity Analysis and Uncertainty Propagation from Basic Nuclear Data to Reactor Physics and Safety Relevant Parameters

TENDL-2011 processing and criticality benchmarking

NEUTRON PHYSICAL ANALYSIS OF SIX ENERGETIC FAST REACTORS

Development of Multigroup Cross Section Generation Code MC 2-3 for Fast Reactor Analysis

SENSITIVITY AND PERTURBATION THEORY IN FAST REACTOR CORE DESIGN

Analysis of the TRIGA Reactor Benchmarks with TRIPOLI 4.4

Nuclear Data for Innovative Fast Reactors: Impact of Uncertainties and New Requirements

ORNL Nuclear Data Evaluation Accomplishments for FY 2013

Calculating the effective delayed neutron fraction using Monte Carlo techniques

I. Kodeli 1. INTRODUCTION

Implementation of new adjoint-based methods for sensitivity analysis and uncertainty quantication in Serpent

Low-Grade Nuclear Materials as Possible Threats to the Nonproliferation Regime. (Report under CRDF Project RX0-1333)

Error Estimation for ADS Nuclear Properties by using Nuclear Data Covariances

Nuclear Fission. 1/v Fast neutrons. U thermal cross sections σ fission 584 b. σ scattering 9 b. σ radiative capture 97 b.

Sodium void coefficient map by Serpent

Review of nuclear data of major actinides and 56 Fe in JENDL-4.0

Control of the fission chain reaction

EVALUATION OF NEUTRON INDUCED REACTIONS ON 238 U NUCLEUS

Needs for Nuclear Reactions on Actinides

REVIEW OF RESULTS FOR THE OECD/NEA PHASE VII BENCHMARK: STUDY OF SPENT FUEL COMPOSITIONS FOR LONG-TERM DISPOSAL

Neutronic analysis of SFR lattices: Serpent vs. HELIOS-2

Title. Author(s)Chiba, Go; Tsuji, Masashi; Narabayashi, Tadashi. CitationAnnals of nuclear energy, 65: Issue Date Doc URL.

MUSE-4 BENCHMARK CALCULATIONS USING MCNP-4C AND DIFFERENT NUCLEAR DATA LIBRARIES

Implementation of the CLUTCH method in the MORET code. Alexis Jinaphanh

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF WWER-440 REACTOR CORE WITH PARCS/HELIOS AND PARCS/SERPENT CODES

TENDL-TMC for dpa and pka

M&C 2017 Workshop Program (Sunday, April 16, 2016)

JRPR. Current Status of ACE Format Libraries for MCNP at Nuclear Data Center of KAERI. Original Research. Introduction

Considerations for Measurements in Support of Thermal Scattering Data Evaluations. Ayman I. Hawari

Chapter 5: Applications Fission simulations

Target accuracy of MA nuclear data and progress in validation by post irradiation experiments with the fast reactor JOYO

Analytical Validation of Uncertainty in Reactor Physics Parameters for Nuclear Transmutation Systems

How to Design a Critical Experiment aka CED-1 and CED-2

ANALYSIS OF THE COOLANT DENSITY REACTIVITY COEFFICIENT IN LFRs AND SFRs VIA MONTE CARLO PERTURBATION/SENSITIVITY

Status of ENDF/B-VII.1 library

Introduction to Nuclear Data

Benchmark Experiment for Fast Neutron Spectrum Potassium Worth Validation in Space Power Reactor Design

Nuclear Cross-Section Measurements at the Manuel Lujan Jr. Neutron Scattering Center

D. Cano Ott Nuclear Innovation Nuclear Fission Division Dept. of Energy. CIEMAT-IFIC-UPC collaboration

Statistical Model Calculations for Neutron Radiative Capture Process

NEUTRONIC ANALYSIS OF HE-EFIT EFIT ADS - SOME RESULTS -

Lecture 13. Applications of Nuclear Physics Fission Reactors and Bombs Overview

Influence of Nuclear Data Uncertainties on Reactor Core Calculations

Nuclear Data Uncertainty Analysis in Criticality Safety. Oliver Buss, Axel Hoefer, Jens-Christian Neuber AREVA NP GmbH, PEPA-G (Offenbach, Germany)

Comparison of U-Pu and Th-U cycles in MSR

This is the submitted version of a paper presented at PHYSOR 2014 International Conference; Kyoto, Japan; 28 Sep. - 3 Oct., 2014.

Treatment of Implicit Effects with XSUSA.

Measurements of the Prompt Fission Neutron Spectrum at LANSCE: The Chi-Nu Experiment

Excerpt from the Proceedings of the COMSOL Users Conference 2007 Grenoble

International Evaluation

Present Status of the JENDL Project. Osamu IWAMOTO and Kenji YOKOYAMA Japan Atomic Energy Agency

MCRT L8: Neutron Transport

Lectures on Applied Reactor Technology and Nuclear Power Safety. Lecture No 1. Title: Neutron Life Cycle

Fission yield calculations with TALYS/GEF

Elastic scattering. Elastic scattering

X. Assembling the Pieces

Improved time integration methods for burnup calculations with Monte Carlo neutronics

Nuclear data uncertainty propagation using a Total Monte Carlo approach

Fundamentals of Nuclear Reactor Physics

Core Physics Second Part How We Calculate LWRs

High precision neutron inelastic cross section measurements

Invited. The latest BROND-3 developments. 1 Introduction. 2 Cross section evaluations for actinides

Nuclear Data Section Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications

R&D in Nuclear Data for Reactor Physics Applications in CNL (CNL = Canadian Nuclear Laboratories) D. Roubtsov

Nuclear data sensitivity, uncertainty and target accuracy assessment for future nuclear systems

Testing of Nuclear Data Libraries for Fission Products

6 Neutrons and Neutron Interactions

Upcoming features in Serpent photon transport mode

Application of Bayesian Monte Carlo Analysis to Criticality Safety Assessment

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF ALLEGRO MOX CORE. Bratislava, Iľkovičova 3, Bratislava, Slovakia

INTERCOMPARISON OF CALCULATIONS FOR GODIVA AND JEZEBEL

17 Neutron Life Cycle

International Evaluation

VI. Chain Reaction. Two basic requirements must be filled in order to produce power in a reactor:

Activation Analysis. Characteristic decay mechanisms, α, β, γ Activity A reveals the abundance N:

Transcription:

Potential Use of beta-eff and other Benchmarks for Adjustment Ivo Kodeli SG39 Meeting, NEA, May 19, 2015

Analysed benchmarks from ICSBEP and IRPhE SNEAK-7A & -7B: MOX fuel reflected by metallic depleted U. Jezebel: bare sphere of 239 Pu metal, 6.385-cm radius Skidoo (Jezebel-23): bare ~98.1% 233 U sphere; Popsy (Flattop-Pu): ~20-cm natural U reflected 239 Pu sphere; Topsy (Flattop-25): ~20-cm natural U reflected 235 U sphere; Flattop-23: ~20-cm natural U reflected 233 U sphere; Big Ten: 10% enriched U with U-reflector, cylinder r=41.91cm, h=96.428cm; ZPPR-9: MOX core with sodium cooling, depleted U blanket. - I. Kodeli, Sensitivity and uncertainty in the effective delayed neutron fraction (β eff ), Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 715 (2013)70-78

Calulated & measured β-eff

Analysis of benchmarks from ICSBEP and IRPhE SUSD3D sensitivity-uncertainty calculations, PARTISN/DANTSYS (1D, 2D, 3D), ENDF/B-VII.0 33-group cross-sections (TRANSX) JENDL-4.0m (delayed nu-bar), COMMARA-2 & SCALE-6.0 covariance matrices; Validation against M/C: Winfried Zwermann: XSUSA Manuele Aufiero: SERPENT2 GPT extended

FLATTOP-23: Total uncertainty in β-eff: 5.5/6.9 % (β exp = 395 pcm) β (pcm): 233 U: 260 235 U: 650 238 U f : 1480

FLATTOP-Pu (POPSY)

FLATTOP-Pu (POPSY)

Comparison of β eff and k eff sensitivities with respect to inelastic and elastic cross-sections of 238 U (Popsy - FLATTOP-Pu) SG39, NEA, Nov. 27-28, 2014

The fact that an important part of the total k eff and β eff uncertainty comes from the 238 U inelastic cross-section uncertainty makes such benchmarks potentially suitable for the validation of these nuclear reaction data. Due to the different shapes of the sensitivity profiles it is expected that the combined use of criticality and β eff measurements would provide a better insight and an efficient validation of these nuclear data in the energy range above 1 MeV.

SNEAK-7A: Sensitivity to k eff and β eff k-eff Sensitivity (%/%) β (pcm): 235 U: 650 238 U f : 1480 239 Pu: 210 240 Pu: 270 241 Pu: 490 MAT elastic inelastic (n,f) (n,γ) ν del ν pmt U-235 0.001-2. 10-4 0.037-0.005 3. 10-4 0.056 U-238 0.102-0.017 0.087-0.156 0.002 0.137 Pu-239 0.006-0.001 0.540-0.058 0.002 0.779 β-eff Sensitivity (%/%) MAT elastic inelastic (n,f) (n,γ) ν del ν pmt ν U-235-2. 10-4 -0.001 0.052-0.001 0.080-0.025 0.055 U-238-0.011-0.151 0.276-0.017 0.488-0.233 0.255 Pu-239-0.002-0.012-0.252-0.006 0.402-0.700-0.298

SNEAK-7A: Uncertainty in β eff (TOTAL~3 %) SNEAK-7A Uncertainty (%) MAT. elastic inelast. (n,f) (n,γ) ν ν pmt χ p χ d TOTAL del JENDL 4.0m U-235 ~0 0.017 0.074 0.004 0.218 0.006 0.050 0.044 0.23 U-238 0.051 1.425 0.101 0.066 1.610 0.138 0.025 0.279 2.18 Pu-239 0.008 0.120 0.074 0.018 1.529 0.122 0.523 0.091 1.63 SUM 0.13 1.44 0.19 0.07 2.23 0.18 0.53 0.30 2.7 COMMARA-2 U-235 0.008 0.008 0.025 0.017 N/A 0.002 0.036 / 0.05 U-238 2.515 2.595 0.144 0.045 N/A 0.270 0.017 / 2.62 Pu-239 0.169 0.216 0.126 0.055 N/A 0.051 0.341 / 0.43 SUM 2.52 2.60 0.19 0.07 N/A 0.28 0.35 / 2.6

SNEAK-7B: Uncertainty in β eff (TOTAL~3 %) JEF/EFF, NEA, Nov 2012

Sensitivity of β-eff to and k-eff to nuclear data SensitivitiesPlots2012\SensitivitiesPlots.bat

CONCLUSIONS According to the available covariance data the total uncertainty in β eff was found to be in general around 3%, but up to 7% in the 233 U reactor systems. The β eff uncertainty is in most cases predominantly due to the uncertainties in delayed neutron yields, contributing in the Jezebel, Skidoo, Topsy, Big-ten and Flattop 23 benchmarks over 90% to the total uncertainty. In some cases (Popsy, SNEAK-7A, -7B and ZPPR-9) the inelastic and elastic scattering (contributing with few %), fission crosssections ( 0.2%) and prompt neutron yields ( 0.2%), as well as prompt and delayed fission spectra (roughly 0.5%) play an important role. Due to their high sensitivity and different shapes of sensitivity profiles the β eff experiments can provide a complementary information to critical experiments for the validation of nuclear data (other than ν d ). 238 U inelastic and elastic scattering (&fission, PFNS) are particularly interesting examples where β eff measurements could contribute to the improved nuclear data evaluations. Sensitivity profiles for SNEAK-7A, & -7B, Jezebel, Skidoo (Jezebel-23), Popsy (Flattop- Pu), Topsy (Flattop-25), Flattop-23: Big Ten: ZPPR-9 were evaluated in 33 groups and could be made available for adjustment purposes.

SINBAD FNS-Liquid Oxygen PCA REPLICA (new 3D TORT model prepared by M. Pescarini) ASPIS Iron (old benchmark, but could provide sensitivities to fast reaction rates Other ASPIS benchmarks