Distinguishing fissions of 232 Th, 237 Np and 238 U with beta-delayed gamma rays

Similar documents
Seaborg s Plutonium?

USE OF A SLOWPOKE-2 REACTOR FOR NUCLEAR FORENSICS APPLICATIONS

arxiv:nucl-ex/ v2 21 Jul 2005

PARAMETERISATION OF FISSION NEUTRON SPECTRA (TRIGA REACTOR) FOR NEUTRON ACTIVATION WITHOUT THE USED OF STANDARD

NUCL 3000/5030 Laboratory 2 Fall 2013

nuclear material in cargo containers via active neutron interrogation

WM2014 Conference, March 2 6, 2014, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

International Nuclear Physics Conference Adelaide, Australia September 13, 2016

Experimental Studies on the Self-Shielding Effect in Fissile Fuel Breeding Measurement in Thorium Oxide Pellets Irradiated with 14 MeV Neutrons

Quartz-Crystal Spectrometer for the Analysis of Plutonium K X-Rays

Cf-252 spontaneous fission prompt neutron and photon correlations

Spectral Analysis for the High Efficiency Multimode Imager

REFERENCE SOURCES FOR THE CALIBRATION OF THE AUTOCORRELATION SINGLE-CRYSTAL SCINTILLATION TIME SPECTROMETER

An introduction to Neutron Resonance Densitometry (Short Summary)

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 29 Jun 2011

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PIGE, PIXE AND NAA ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES FOR THE DETERMINATION OF MINOR ELEMENTS IN STEELS

Gamma background measurements in the Boulby Underground Laboratory

TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP ITWG GUIDELINE ON LABORATORY APPLICATIONS OF HIGH-RESOLUTION GAMMA SPECTROMETRY

A Monte Carlo Simulation for Estimating of the Flux in a Novel Neutron Activation System using 252 Cf Source

On the HalfiLife of LABORATORY ERNEST ORLANDO LAWRENCE BERKELEYNATIONAL. and Particle Astrophysics Nuclear Science and Physics Divisions

A Proposal of Nuclear Materials Detection and Inspection Systems in Heavily Shielded Suspicious Objects by Non-destructive Manner.

Geant4 Monte Carlo code application in photon interaction parameter of composite materials and comparison with XCOM and experimental data

Evaluation of Nondestructive Assay Characterization Methods for Pipe- Over-Pack Containers

Correlations in Prompt Neutrons and Gamma Rays from Fission

Nuclear Reactions A Z. Radioactivity, Spontaneous Decay: Nuclear Reaction, Induced Process: x + X Y + y + Q Q > 0. Exothermic Endothermic

Design of an Integrated Inspection System For Detection of Explosive and Illicit Materials

Nuclear cross-section measurements at the Manuel Lujan Jr. Neutron Scattering Center. Michal Mocko

FRAM V5.2. Plutonium and Uranium Isotopic Analysis Software

Application of a Laser-Wakefield Driven Monochromatic Photon Source to Nuclear Resonance Fluorescence

This paper should be understood as an extended version of a talk given at the

High efficiency 3 He neutron detector TETRA for DESIR.

Experimental Determination of Cross Sections for (n,x) Nuclear Reactions

MC simulation of a PGNAA system for on-line cement analysis

Determination of the activity of radionuclides

Introduction to Radiological Sciences Neutron Detectors. Theory of operation. Types of detectors Source calibration Survey for Dose

Activities of the neutron standardization. at the Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science (KRISS)

Correlations in Prompt Neutrons and Gamma Rays from Fission

in Cross-Section Data

Partial Neutron Capture Cross Section Determination of 237 Np, 242

Activation Analysis. Characteristic decay mechanisms, α, β, γ Activity A reveals the abundance N:

Active Mode Calibration of the Combined Thermal Epithermal Neutron (CTEN) System

PRACTICAL GAMMA SPECTROSCOPY ASSAY TECHNIQUES FOR LARGE VOLUME LOW-LEVEL WASTE BOXES

Project Memorandum. N N o. = e (ρx)(µ/ρ) (1)

Nuclear Lifetimes. = (Eq. 1) (Eq. 2)

Radioactivity III: Measurement of Half Life.

V. 3. Development of an Accelerator Beam Loss Monitor Using an Optical Fiber

THE COMPTON EFFECT Last Revised: January 5, 2007

Photofission of 238-U Nuclei

Chapter 3: Neutron Activation and Isotope Analysis

Validation of the MCNP computational model for neutron flux distribution with the neutron activation analysis measurement

Neutron activation analysis. Contents. Introduction

Neutron and Gamma Ray Imaging for Nuclear Materials Identification

Neutron-Induced Reactions Investigations in the Neutrons Energy Range up to 16 MeV

Comparison of Several Detector Technologies for Measurement of Special Nuclear Materials i

Application of Spectral Summing to Indeterminate Suspect Low-Level Drums at Los Alamos National Laboratory

A Photofission Delayed γ-ray Spectra Calculation Tool for the Conception of a Nuclear Material Characterization Facility

PERSPECTIVES OF PERSONNEL EXTERNAL DOSIMETRY AT STANFORD LINEAR ACCELERATOR CENTER

Measurement of prompt fission γ-ray spectra in fast neutroninduced

SURROGATE REACTIONS. An overview of papers by Jason Burke from LLNL

M. S. Krick D. G. Langner J. E. Stewart.

anti-compton BGO detector

Gamma-Spectrum Generator

TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP ITWG GUIDELINE ON IN-FIELD APPLICATIONS OF HIGH- RESOLUTION GAMMA SPECTROMETRY FOR ANALYSIS OF SPECIAL NUCLEAR MATERIAL

Verification measurements of alpha active waste

Cross-section Measurements of Relativistic Deuteron Reactions on Copper by Activation Method

Total kinetic energy and fragment mass distributions from fission of Th-232 and U-233

Identification of Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material in Sand

THE USE OF GE DETECTORS FOR (N,XN) CROSS-SECTION MEASUREMENTS AT INTENSE AND LOW FREQUENCY PULSED NEUTRON BEAMS. Abstract

Shielded Scintillator for Neutron Characterization

CALIBRATION OF SCINTILLATION DETECTORS USING A DT GENERATOR Jarrod D. Edwards, Sara A. Pozzi, and John T. Mihalczo

Introduction to Environmental Measurement Techniques Radioactivity. Dana Pittauer 1of 48

Digital simulation of neutron and gamma measurement devices

RADIOACTIVE SAMPLE EFFECTS ON EDXRF SPECTRA

Characterizing New Multi-Channel Peak Sensing ADC-Mesytec MADC-32

Deuteron activation cross section measurements at the NPI cyclotron

Nuclear Cross-Section Measurements at the Manuel Lujan Jr. Neutron Scattering Center

Verification measurements of alpha active waste

Characterization of a Portable Neutron Coincidence Counter Angela Thornton and W. Charlton Texas A&M University College Station, TX

Nuclear Data Activities in the IAEA-NDS

Measuring Neutron Absorption Cross Sections of Natural Platinum via Neutron Activation Analysis

Photoneutron Interrogation of Uranium Samples by a 4 MeV LINAC. A Feasibility Study

SOURCES of RADIOACTIVITY

Neutron Spectrum Measurement in a Medical Cyclotron

B. Rouben McMaster University Course EP 4D03/6D03 Nuclear Reactor Analysis (Reactor Physics) 2015 Sept.-Dec.

Physics Dept. PHY-503-SEMESTER 112 PROJECT. Measurement of Carbon Concentration in Bulk Hydrocarbon Samples

Induced Quantum Entanglement of Nuclear Metastable States of 115 In

Coordinated Research Project on Photonuclear Data and Photon Strength Functions Approved in July 2015; Code F41032; Duration 2016 t 2020.

Background Reduction Using Collimators on a Portable HPGe Nuclide Identifier

Fissile material experiments at the Device Assembly Facility

Use of Gamma Rays from the Decay of 13.8-sec "Be to Calibrate a Germanium Gamma Ray Detector for Measurements up to 8 MeV

Minimum Detectable Activity Estimates for a Germanium-Detector Based Spectroscopic Portal Monitor

NEUTRON ACTIVATION ANALYSIS. 1. Introduction [1]

Neutron capture cross section on Lu isotopes at DANCE

QUIZ: Physics of Nuclear Medicine Atomic Structure, Radioactive Decay, Interaction of Ionizing Radiation with Matter

An Improved U-Pu System for Field Pu Measurements

Measurement of Average Thermal Neutron Flux for PGNAA Setup

The possibility to use energy plus transmutation set-up for neutron production and transport benchmark studies

The surrogate-reaction method: status and perspectives. Beatriz Jurado, CENBG, France

Statistical Model Calculations for Neutron Radiative Capture Process

Transcription:

Distinguishing fissions of 232, 237 and 238 with beta-delayed gamma rays A. Iyengar 1, E.B. Norman 1, C. Howard 1, C. Angell 1, A. Kaplan 1, J. J. Ressler 2, P. Chodash 1, E. Swanberg 1, A. Czeszumska 1, B. Wang 1, R. Yee 1, H.A. Shugart 3 1Department of Nuclear Engineering, niversity of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, SA 2Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94551, SA 3 Department of Physics, niversity of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, SA ABSTRACT Measurements of beta-delayed gamma-ray spectra following 14-MeV neutron-induced fissions of 232, 238, and 237 were conducted at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory s 88- Inch Cyclotron. Spectra were collected for times ranging from 1 minute to 14 hours after irradiation. Intensity ratios of gamma-ray lines were extracted from the data that allow identification of the fissioning isotope.

1. Introduction When a nucleus undergoes fission, the products emit both prompt and delayed characteristic gamma-rays. e delayed gamma-rays are emitted following beta-decays, and therefore also have characteristic time scales associated with their emissions. ese gamma-rays can be used to identify fissionable material hidden in cargo containers, or distinguish between fissionable isotopes, and are useful for assay of nuclear fuel. ey can also be potentially used in nuclear forensics to identify the average energy of neutrons producing fission and the original fissionable isotope. Previous works measuring beta-delayed gamma-rays from neutron-induced fission focused on 238 and the major fissile isotopes, 235 and 239 Pu. [1],[2],[3],[4]. However, for beta-delayed gamma-ray spectroscopy to be a useful tool, a complete set of measurements on all likely fissionable isotopes is needed. Measurement of beta-delayed gammarays from fissions of 232, and 237 will help expand the database, making it a viable tool in detection, assay, and nuclear safeguards applications. e fast neutron induced fissions of 238, 232 and 237 produce complex fission spectra for many hours following irradiation, samples of 238, 232 and 237 were irradiated with 14-MeV neutrons in order to measure the beta-delayed gamma-ray spectra from induced fission. We used both high-resolution germanium detectors and low-resolution plastic scintillators to measure gamma energy and time spectra. Spectra from both sets of detectors from 1 minute to 14 hours after irradiation were found to contain distinguishing features that can be used to identify the fissioning isotope. We present distinctive gamma-ray intensity ratios for each sample in several time bins, which provide adequate data to identify the fissionable material present. 2. Experimental method Samples of ~ 2 g each of 238, 232 and 237 oxides obtained from C Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory were irradiated at the 88-Inch Cyclotron at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory with neutrons produced from a deuteron beam incident on a thick beryllium target. A 33-MeV, 1.0-µA deuteron beam was used to produce a neutron energy distribution centered at 14 MeV. [5]. Each of the oxide samples was doubly encapsulated in polyethylene capsules. e fissionable samples were placed immediately behind the beryllium

neutron-production target. e samples were covered with 1 mm of cadmium to exclude thermal neutrons. Each sample was exposed to neutrons for 1 minute, and samples were removed immediately after exposure and counted with gamma-ray detectors for a long sequence of time intervals beginning approximately 1 minute after the end of neutron irradiation. e samples were quickly moved from the irradiation location and placed equidistant from a 10x10x15-cm plastic scintillator and a 65% relative efficiency high-purity germanium detector for 10 oneminute counting intervals. e samples were placed 5 cm from each detector face. Approximately 2 cm of lead and 3 cm of polyethylene were placed between the sample and the detectors in order to attenuate electrons and low-energy gamma rays. Separate well-shielded HPGe detectors were then used to continue counting each sample for approximately 14 hours. Combinations of lead and plastic were also used in these measurements to attenuate betas and low energy gammas. All detectors were energy-calibrated with 137 Cs, 22 Na and 232 sources. After counting of the all the targets was completed, careful gamma-ray efficiency measurements were performed with a variety of calibrated sources covering the energy range up to 1.4 MeV. 2.1 Time Bins Following irradiation, spectra were recorded for 101-minute time bins, followed by 153- minute time bins, followed by a variable number of 10-minute time bins. is enabled the observation of all significant spectral changes with time scales ranging from minutes to approximately half a day. To simplify the analysis and reporting of the measurements, the experimental data was combined into six larger time bins: 5 8 m, 18 33 m, 1 1.5 h, 2.5 3.5 h, 5 7 h, and 10 14 h after the irradiation period. ese time bins are long enough to obtain good statistical precision, and they span the full time range of our data set. ese same time intervals were selected by Marrs et. al [1]. for their complete coverage of the data set and their capture of all important time-dependent features in the fission-product spectra such that there are no major gaps in temporal coverage. In what follows, we report experimental line ratios for these six time intervals; however, a different choice of time intervals would yield similar results and the same conclusions.

2.2 Peak Identification and Peak-Area Extraction Peak identification and area extraction on the energy spectra from the HPGe detector was performed manually using the Ortec Maestro software. e extracted peak areas were then corrected for the energy-dependent detection efficiency before intensity ratios were determined. Figures 1(a) and 1(b) illustrate summed gamma-ray spectra from the germanium and plastic scintillator detectors, respectively, for the first 10 minutes of counting the 237 Sample. From Figure 1(a) it can be seen that the Germanium spectrum is extremely complicated due to the presence of numerous fission products and their many gamma-ray lines. 2.3 Line Pair Selection Line pairs selection criteria were specified by Marrs et. al. e basic criterion to be fulfilled is that the intensity ratios at corresponding energies need to differ significantly between 232, 237, and 238. Line pairs also needed to be close in energy to minimize the energy dependent corrections for absorption and detector efficiency. Peaks below 500 kev were avoided due to the complexity of the spectra and high background in that energy range. Gamma rays selected as line pair candidates were validated whenever possible by identifying other lines from those isotopes and comparing measured intensities to those predicted pre-experiment using online nuclear databases [6, 7, 8]. 3. Fissile Material Identification As stated before, the goal was to look for line pairs with differing intensity ratios between the isotopes of interest. Table 1 shows the gamma ray ratios for different time ranges comparing 232, 237 and 238. Notice that there was no single ratio that could be used to identify all three isotopes within the 5-8 minute time bin. Figures 2-6 show a visual comparison of all three lines plotted at the peak energies of interest. 4. Scintillator Data Analysis Ten one minute spectra were collected with both, an HPGe detector and a plastic scintillator detector immediately after irradiation of each sample. e spectra from the scintillator do not have distinct peaks due to weaker energy resolution compared to the HPGe as can be seen in Figures 1(a) and 1(b). However, these detectors provide valuable data that demonstrate

different trends over time and energy for different fissile materials. By integrating over certain energy ranges, we can compare the trends and ratios in the total counts seen in each sample in order to distinguish between the materials. e integrated counts can also be measured as a function of time to determine decay constants specific for each material. Energies below 3 MeV are not considered in analysis to exclude any natural background. e count rate drops significantly above approximately 6.5 MeV and after 6 or 7 minutes, resulting in very high statistical uncertainty. For these reasons, the optimal time and energy range for material identification is 1-6 minutes following irradiation and 3-6.5 MeV. Table 2 shows ratios of counts integrated over 3-3.5 MeV versus 5-5.5 MeV, 6-6.5 MeV, and 7-7.5 MeV ranges for 237, 232 and 238. From this table, it can be seen that at higher energies, the ability to distinguish between the three isotopes improves. Also, ratios of 237 and 238 stay fairly close in value, and the 232 values differ from the 237 and 238 values more. From the summed gamma-ray spectra, it is verified that it is difficult to differentiate 238 from 237 from scintillator spectra alone. However, it is easy to distinguish 232 from 238 and 237. 5. Conclusions We have shown that there are several different ways to distinguish between the fast fission of 237, 232 and 238. When these materials fission, a broad range of fission products are created all emitting beta delayed gamma-rays at characteristic time scales. Different fissile materials produce fission products in different abundances. By examining spectra at different times following induced fission, it is possible to identify the most prominent of these gamma-rays and use them to distinguish between the fissile materials. e best line pairs for differentiating materials have been identified for several different time bins, ranging from 5 minutes to 14 hours. Fission spectra measured by a plastic scintillator have also proven to be useful in identifying fissile material by comparing, quantitatively, the shape of the spectra, the decrease in counts seen over time, and the different behavior of the materials in specific energy bins. From the 237, 232 and 238 fission product spectra, it was possible to identify common line pairs to help distinguish them individually. Our results show it is relatively easy to distinguish 232 from 237 and 238 however, it is difficult to distinguish 237 from 238. Some of the

experimental line pair ratios are much different from the theoretical ratios derived [6]. Somewhat surprisingly, the discrepancies between the theoretical ratios and those measured here appear larger for the 14-MeV neutron induced fission of 238 than for those of 232 or 237. Several large discrepancies of this kind were also noted in the work of Marrs et al. [1]. Possible explanations for these differences between theory and experiment are that some fission yields in the England and Rider compilations may be incorrect, or that some fission product beta-delayed gamma-ray intensities may be incorrect. Dedicated high-precision measurements of both fission yields and fission product beta decay schemes would be needed to resolve these issues. 6. Acknowledgements We wish to thank the 88-Inch Cyclotron operations and facilities staff for their help in performing this experiment. is work was supported in part at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory by the Director, Office of Energy Research, Office of High Energy and Nuclear Physics, Division of Nuclear Physics, of the.s. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC02-05CH11231; the.s. Department of Energy, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344; the Department of Energy, NNSA, Office of Non-Proliferation (NA- 22); the.s. Dept. of Homeland Security under contract number ARI-022, and NSERC.

References [1] R.E. Marrs, et.al. Fission-product gamma-ray line pairs sensitive to fissile material and neutron energy, Nucl. Instr. And Meth. A 592(2008) 463 471. [2] E. Swanberg, et.al. sing low resolution gamma detectors to detect and differentiate 239 Pu and 235 fissions, J Radioanal Nucl Chem (2009) 282:901 904 [3] D.H. Beddingfield and F. E. Cecil. Identification of fissile materials from fission product gammaray spectra, Nucl. Instr. And Meth. A 417(1998) 405 412. [4] C. L. Hollas, et.al. Analysis of fissionable material using delayed gamma rays from photofission, Nucl. Instr. And Meth. B24/25 (1987) 503 505. [5] J.P. Meulders, P. Leleux, P.C. Macq, C.Pirart, Phys. Med. Biol. 20(1975) 235 [6] T.R. England and B.F. Rider, Fast Pooled Neutron Induced Fission. Los Alamos National Laboratory, LA-R-94-3106; ENDF-349 (1993) [7] L.P. Ekström and R.B. Firestone, WWW Table of Radioactive Isotopes, database version 2/28/99 from RL http://ie.lbl.gov/toi [8] National Nuclear Data Center, information extracted from the NuDat 2 database, http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/nudat2/

Time Bin 5-8 m 5-8 m 18-33 m 1-1.5 h 2.5-3.5 h 5-7 h 10-14 h Line Pair Rb (1032) Sb (974) (832) (794) (1032) (1010) (2218) (2196) (1032) (1072) (2196) (2218) (1384) (1261) (1384) (1261) (1384) (1261) Fission Isotope Experimental Intensity Ratio 0.30 ± 0.020 1.03 ± 0.050 3.023 ± 0.450 0.896 ± 0.050 3.270 ± 0.310 1.382 ± 0.050 2.260 ± 0.050 0.572 ± 0.055 1.862 ± 0.103 0.877 ± 0.040 1.893 ± 0.246 0.591 ± 0.047 0.500 ± 0.020 0.433 ± 0.056 0.240 ± 0.017 0.300 ± 0.020 6.080 ± 0.730 3.988 ± 0.144 3.530 ± 0.09 3.636 ± 0.298 2.207 ± 0.064 2.060 ± 0.040 2.099 ± 0.159 0.980 ± 0.035 0.790 ± 0.020 eoretical Intensity Ratio 0.22 1.97 3.206 0.448 2.821 1.032 1.400 0.876 2.150 1.470 1.806 0.511 0.260 0.416 0.152 1.200 6.036 3.136 5.540 3.872 2.011 3.570 1.614 0.839 1.490 Table 1: Best intensity ratios for the fission products of 237, 232 and 238. Line pair ratios to identify all three were found and are shown for all time bins except the 5-8 min interval. It was necessary to use different line pairs to identify all three targets in the 5-8 min time bin. Ratio 232 238 237 N(3-3.5 MeV)/N(5-5.5 MeV) 4.63 6.02 5.95 N(3-3.5 MeV)/N(6-6.5 MeV) 10.1 14.4 15.1 N(3-3.5 MeV)/N(7-7.5 MeV) 27.5 62.5 49.5 Table 2: Ratios of number of counts observed in the plastic scintillator integrated over different time bins for each of the target isotopes. Note that no corrections for energydependent gamma ray detection efficiencies have been applied to any of these data.

Fig 1(a): HPGe gamma-ray spectrum of 237 fission products from the first 10 minutes of counting after irradiation.

Fig 1(b): Plastic scintillator gamma-ray spectrum of 237 fission products from the first 10 minutes of counting after irradiation.

Fig. 2: Comparison of gamma-ray spectra from 232, 238, and 237 fission by 14 MeV peak neutrons, integrated from 18 to 33 min after fission. Line pairs shown here are from 138 Cs (1010 kev) and 89 Rb (1032 kev) peaks.

Fig. 3: Comparison of gamma-ray spectra from 232, 238, and 237 fission by 14 MeV peak neutrons, integrated from 1 to 1.5 hours after fission. Line pairs shown here are from 89 Rb (2196 kev) and 134 I (2218 kev) peaks.

Fig. 4: Comparison of gamma-ray spectra from 232, 238, and 237 fission by 14 MeV peak neutrons, integrated from 2.5 to 3.5 hours after fission. Line pairs shown here are from 135 I (1384 kev) and 92 Sr (1260 kev) peaks.

Fig. 5: Comparison of gamma-ray spectra from 232, 238, and 237 fission by 14 MeV peak neutrons, integrated from 5 to 7 hours after fission. Line pairs shown here are from 135 I (1384 kev) and 92 Sr (1260 kev) peaks.

Fig. 6: Comparison of gamma-ray spectra from 232, 238, and 237 fission by 14 MeV peak neutrons, integrated from 10 to 14 hours after fission. Line pairs shown here are from 135 I (1384 kev) and 92 Sr (1260 kev) peaks.