arxiv:708.05693v [math.gn] 7 Aug 207 COINCIDENCE POINT RESULTS INVOLVING A GENERALIZED CLASS OF SIMULATION FUNCTIONS D.K. PATEL, P.R. PATLE, L. BUDHIA, D. GOPAL Abstract. The purpose of this work is to introduce a general class of C G - simulation functions and obtained some new coincidence and common fixed points results in metric spaces. Some useful examples are presented to illustrate our theorems. Results obtained in this paper extend, generalize and unify some well known fixed and common fixed point results.. Introduction Because of its large number of applications in various branches of mathematical sciences, fixed point theory enticed many mathematicians. The most relevant result of the theory is Banach contraction principle BCP. Several authors have studied on various generalizations of Banach contraction mapping principle. For important and famous examples of such generalizations, we may cite Edelstein [7], Kannan [2], Reich[23, 24, 25], Ciric[5] and Suzuki[27]. Recently, BCP has been generalized in a new way by Khojasteh et al. in [5] defining Z-contraction with the help of a class of control functions called simulation functions. In [9], Olgun et al. obtained the fixed point results for generalized Z-contractions. Further, L-de-Hierro et al. [8] enlarged this class of simulation functions and extended some coincidence and common fixed point theorems. All the above results, require the contraction condition or the contraction type condition to hold for every possible pair of points in domain. In order to relax this requirement in accordance with the outcome of the result Suzuki [27] contributed significantly. The results of Suzuki has inspired many researcher working in the area of metric fixed point theory see [20],[28] and references therein. Recently, Kumam et al. in [7] defined Suzuki type Z-contraction and unified some known fixed point results. In [2], Radenovic and Chandok coined the notion of Z G,g-contraction and generalized the results of Jungck [0], L-de-Hierro et al. [8] and Olgun et al. [9]. Motivatedbytheresultsof[7]and[2], inthisworkweintroducetheintuition of Suzuki type Z G,g-contractions and obtain some coincidence point theorems. An application to fractional order functional differential equation is presented to illustrate the usability of the obtained result. 2. Preliminaries We now revisit some concepts and results in the literature. Definition 2.. [2, 2] A mapping G : [0, 2 R is called C-class function if it is continuous and satisfies the following conditions: 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. 47H0, 54H25. Key words and phrases. Coincidence Point; Z-contraction; Suzuki type Z G,g-contractions.
2 D.K. PATEL, P.R. PATLE, L. BUDHIA, D. GOPAL i Gs,t s, ii Gs,t = s implies that either s = 0 or t = 0, for all s,t [0,. Definition 2.2. [2] A mapping G : [0, 2 R has a property C G, if there exists an C G 0 such that i Gs,t > C G implies s > t, ii Gt,t C G for all t [0,. Definition 2.3. [4] A simulation function is a mapping ζ : [0, 2 R satisfying the following: i ζt,s < s t for all t,s > 0, ii if {t n } and {s n } are sequences in 0, such that lim and t n < s n, then lim n supζt n,s n < 0. t n = lim s n > 0 n n For examples and related results on simulation functions, one may refer to [6, 8, 9, 3, 5, 4, 6, 8, 22, 26, 29]. Definition 2.4. [3, 2] A C G -simulation function is a mapping ζ : [0, 2 R satisfying the following: a ζt,s < Gs,t for all t,s > 0, where G : [0, 2 R is a C-class function; b if {t n } and {s n } are sequences in 0, such that lim t n = lim s n > 0 n n and t n < s n, then lim supζt n,s n < C G. n Let Z G be the family of all C G -simulation functions ζ : [0, 2 R. Definition 2.5. [2] Let X,d be a metric space and f,g : X X be selfmappings. The mapping f is called a Z G,g-contraction if there exists ζ Z G such that ζdfx,fy,dgx,gy C G 2. for all x,y X with gx gy. If g = i X identity mapping on X and C G = 0, we get Z-contraction of [5]. Definition 2.6. [2] Let X,d be a metric space and f,g : X X be selfmappings. The mapping f is called a generalized Z G,g-contraction if there exists ζ Z G such that ζ dfx,fy,max for all x,y X with gx gy. { dgx,gy,dgx,fx,dgy,fy, dgx,fy+dgy,fx } C G 2 2.2 If g = i X identity mapping on X and C G = 0, we get Z-contraction of [9]. Definition 2.7. [] Let f and g be self-mappings of a set X. If u = fv = gv for some v X, then v is called a coincidence point of f and g and u is called a point of coincidence of f and g. The pair f,g is weakly compatible if the mappings commute at their coincidence points. Proposition 2.. [] Let f and g be weakly compatible self-mappings of a set X. If f and g have a unique point of coincidence u = fx = gx, then u is the unique common fixed point of f and g.
COINCIDENCE POINT RESULTS 3 Lemma 2.2. [2] Let X,d be a metric space and {x n } be a sequence in X such that lim dx n,x n+ = 0. If {x n } is not Cauchy then there exists ε > 0 and two n subsequences {x mk } and {x nk } of {x n } where nk > mk > k such that lim dx mk,x nk = lim dx mk,x nk+ = lim dx mk,x nk = ε k k k and lim dx mk,x nk+ = lim dx mk+,x nk+ = ε. k k 3. Main results In this section, we introduce the new concept of Suzuki type contractions involving C G -simulation functions which is used to prove several coincidence point theorems in complete metric spaces. Definition 3.. Let X,d be a metric space and f,g : X X be self-mappings. A mapping f is called a Suzuki type Z G,g-contraction if there exists ζ Z G such that 2 dgx,fx < dgx,gy = ζdfx,fy,dgx,gy C G 3. for all x,y X with gx gy. Ifg = i X identitymappingonxandc G = 0,wegetSuzukitypeZ-contraction of [7]. Definition 3.2. Let X,d be a metric space and f,g : X X be self-mappings. Themappingf iscalledasuzuki type generalizedz G,g-contractionifthere exists ζ Z G such that 2 dgx,fx < dgx,gy = ζdfx,fy,mx,y C G 3.2 for all x,y X with gx gy, where Mx,y = max { dgx,gy,dgx,fx,dgy,fy, dgx,fy+dgy,fx 2 If g = i X identity mapping on X and C G = 0, we get Suzuki type generalized Z-contraction. Theorem 3.. Let X,d be a metric space, f,g : X X be self-mappings and f be a Suzuki type generalized Z G,g-contraction. Assume that the following conditions hold: i fx gx, ii gx or fx is complete. Then f and g have unique point of coincidence. Proof. Suppose that the point of coincidence exists, then the uniqueness follows as: let u and u 2 be two distinct point of coincidence of f and g i.e. u = fv = gv and u 2 = fv 2 = gv 2 for some v,v 2 X. Now, since 2 dgv,fv = 0 < dgv,gv 2, so by using 3., we get C G ζdfv,fv 2,Mv,v 2 = ζdu,u 2,du,u 2 < Gdu,u 2,du,u 2 C G, }.
4 D.K. PATEL, P.R. PATLE, L. BUDHIA, D. GOPAL which is a contradiction. Thus, the point of coincidence is unique. Consider the sequences {x n } and {y n } defined as y n = fx n = gx n+ for all n N {0}, and assume that y n y n+ for all n N {0}. Let x = x n+,y = x n+2, then 2 dgx n+,fx n+ = 2 dgx n+,gx n+2 < dgx n+,gx n+2. So from 3.2, we have C G ζ dfx n+,fx n+2,mx n+,x n+2 = ζ dy n+,y n+2,max{dy n,y n+,dy n+,y n+2 } < G max{dy n,y n+,dy n+,y n+2 },dy n+,y n+2. Further, using i of Definition 2.2, we have max{dy n,y n+,dy n+,y n+2 } > dy n+,y n+2. Hence for all for all n N {0}, we have dy n,y n+ > dy n+,y n+2. So {dy n,y n+ } is a monotonically decreasing sequence of nonnegative real numbers, and hence there exists l 0 such that lim dy n,y n+ = l. Assume that l > n 0. Since dy n+,y n+2 < Mx n+,x n+2, both dy n+,y n+2 and Mx n+,x n+2 tends to l as n and 2 dy n,y n+ = 2 dgx n+,fx n+ < dgx n+,gx n+2 = dy n,y n+, then using 3.2 and b of Definition 2.4, we get C G lim supζ dy n+,y n+2,mx n+,x n+2 < C G, n which is a contradiction and hence l = 0. Now if we assume that y n = y m for some n > m. Then we can choose x n+ = x m+ and hence also y n+ = y m+. Then using the similar arguments as above we get dy n,y n+ < dy n,y n < < dy m,y m+ = dy n,y n+, which is a contradiction. Similarly if y n = y m for some n < m, we get a contradiction. Hence y n y m for all n m. Now we prove that {y n } is a Cauchy sequence. If not, then by Lemma 2.2 we have lim dx mk,x nk = lim dx mk+,x nk+ = ε, k k and consequently, lim Mx mk+,x nk+ = ε. k We claim that there exists k 0 N such that 2 dy mk,y mk+ < dy mk,y nk, i.e. 2 dgx mk+,fx mk+ < dgx mk+,gx nk+
COINCIDENCE POINT RESULTS 5 for all k k 0. If not, then letting k, we get ε 0, which is not true. Also, using3.2andiofdefinition2.2,wehavedy mk+,y nk+ < Mx mk+,x nk+, then by b of Definition 2.4, we get C G lim supζ dy mk+,y nk+,mx mk+,x nk+ < C G k a contradiction. Hence {y n } is a Cauchy sequence. Suppose gx is complete subspace of X. Then {y n } being contained in gx has a limit in gx, say z X such that y n gz, i.e. gx n gz as n. We will show that z is the coincidence point of f and g. We can suppose y n fz,gz for n N {0}, otherwise we are done. We claim that 2 dgx n,gx n+ < dgx n,gz or 2 dgx n+,gx n+2 < dgx n+,gz 3.3 for every n N {0}. If not, then there exists m N for which 2 dgx m,gx m+ dgx m,gz and 2 dgx m+,gx m+2 dgx m+,gz holds. Then 2dgx m,gz dgx m,gx m+ dgx m,gz+dgz,gx m+ which implies dgx m,gz dgz,gx m+ 2 dgx m+,gx m+2. Further since 2 dgx m,fx m = 2 dgx m,gx m+ < dgx m,gx m+, so from 3., we have C G ζdfx m,fx m+,mx m,x m+ < GMx m,x m+,dfx m,fx m+, and in view of i of Definition 2.2, we get Mx m,x m+ = dgx m,gx m+ > dfx m,fx m+. Now dfx m,fx m+ < dgx m,gx m+ dgx m,gz+dgz,gx m+ 2 dgx m+,gx m+2 + 2 dgx m+,gx m+2 = dgx m+,gx m+2 = dfx m,fx m+, which is a contradiction. Hence 3.3 holds. Now from 3.3 and 3. we have C G ζ dfx n,fz,mx n,z < G Mx n,z,dfx n,fz and then by i of Definition 2.2, we get dfx n,fz < Mx n,z. Now, if we assume fz gz, then taking limit as n, we get dgz,fz < dgz,fz, a contradiction. Hence gz = fz. In same manner if 2 dgx n+,gx n+2 < dgx n+,gv we can show that gz = fz. In case fx is a complete subspace of X, the sequence {y n } converges in gx since fx gx. So the previous argument works. Theorem 3.2. Let X, d be a complete metric space, f, g : X X be selfmappings and f be a Suzuki type generalized Z G,g-contraction. Assume that the following conditions hold: i fx gx, ii g is a continuous, iii f and g are commuting.
6 D.K. PATEL, P.R. PATLE, L. BUDHIA, D. GOPAL Then f and g have unique point of coincidence. Proof. If the coincidence point exist then it is unique as proved in Theorem 3.. Construct the sequences {x n } and {y n } as y n = fx n = gx n+ for all n N {0}. Then the sequence {y n } is Cauchy as shown in proof of Theorem 3.. Since the space X,d is complete, there exists z X such that y n z or gx n z as n. As g is continuous, g 2 x n gz as n. We claim that 2 dggx n,ggx n+ < dggx n,ggz or 2 dggx n+,ggx n+2 < dggx n+,ggz 3.4 for every n N {0}. If not, then there exists m N for which 2 dggx m,ggx m+ dggx m,ggz and 2 dggx m+,ggx m+2 dggx m+,ggz holds. Then which implies 2dggx m,ggz dggx m,ggx m+ dggx m,ggz+dggz,ggx m+ dggx m,ggz dggz,ggx m+ 2 dggx m+,ggx m+2. Further since f and g are commutative, we have 2 dggx m,fgx m = 2 dggx m,gfx m < dggx m,ggx m+. So from 3.2, we have C G ζ dfgx m,fgx m+,mgx m,gx m+ < G Mgx m,gx m+,dfgx m,fgx m+ and in view of i of Definition 2.2, we get Mgx m,gx m+ = dggx m,ggx m+ > dfgx m,fgx m+. Now dfgx m,fgx m+ < dggx m,ggx m+ dggx m,ggz+dggz,ggx m+ 2 dggx m+,ggx m+2 + 2 dggx m+,ggx m+2 = dggx m+,ggx m+2 = dfgx m,fgx m+, which is a contradiction. Hence 3.4 holds. Now from 3.4 and 3.2, we have C G ζ dfgx n,fz,mgx n,z < G Mgx n,z,dfgx n,fz and then by i of Definition 2.2 and f,g are commuting, we get dfgx n,fz = dgfx n,fz < Mgx n,z. Now, if we assume fz gz, then taking limit as n and by continuity of g, we get dgz,fz < dgz,fz, a contradiction. Hence gz = fz. In same manner if 2 dggx n+,ggx n+2 < dggx n+,ggv we can show that gz = fz. Theorem 3.3. Let X,d be a metric space, f,g : X X be self-mappings and f be a Suzuki type Z G,g-contraction. Assume that the following conditions hold: i fx gx, ii gx or fx is complete. Then f and g have unique point of coincidence.
COINCIDENCE POINT RESULTS 7 Proof. If the coincidence point exist then it is unique as proved in Theorem 3.. Construct the sequences {x n } and {y n } as y n = fx n = gx n+ for all n N {0}. Then the sequence {y n } is Cauchy as shown in proof of Theorem 3.. Suppose gx is complete subspace of X. Then {y n } being contained in gx has a limit in gx, say z X such that y n gz, i.e. gx n gz as n. We will show that z is the coincidence point of f and g. We can suppose y n fz and y n gz for n N {0}, otherwise we are done. We also claim that 2 dgx n,gx n+ < dgx n,gz or 2 dgx n+,gx n+2 < dgx n+,gz 3.5 for every n N {0}. If not, then there exists m N for which 2 dgx m,gx m+ dgx m,gz and 2 dgx m+,gx m+2 dgx m+,gz holds. Then 2dgx m,gz dgx m,gx m+ dgx m,gz+dgz,gx m+ which implies dgx m,gz dgz,gx m+ 2 dgx m+,gx m+2. Further since 2 dgx m,fx m = 2 dgx m,gx m+ < dgx m,gx m+, so from 3., we have C G ζdfx m,fx m+,dgx m,gx m+ < Gdgx m,gx m+,dfx m,fx m+, and in view of i of Definition 2.2, we get dgx m,gx m+ > dfx m,fx m+. Now dfx m,fx m+ < dgx m,gx m+ dgx m,gz+dgz,gx m+ 2 dgx m+,gx m+2 + 2 dgx m+,gx m+2 = dgx m+,gx m+2 = dfx m,fx m+ which is a contracdiction. Hence 3.5 holds. Now from 3.5 and 3., we have C G ζ dfx n,fz,dgx n,gz < G dgx n,gz,dfx n,fz and then by i of Definition 2.2, we get dfx n,fz < dgx n,gz. Taking limit as n we get fx n fz. Hence gz = fz. In same manner if 2 dgx n+,gx n+2 < dgx n+,gv, we can show that gz = fz. In case fx is a complete subspace of X, the sequence {y n } convergesin gx since fx gx. So the previous argument works. Theorem 3.4. Let X, d be a complete metric space, f, g : X X be selfmappings and f be a Suzuki type Z G,g-contraction. Assume that the following conditions hold: i fx gx, ii g is a continuous, iii f and g are commuting. Then f and g have unique point of coincidence. Proof. The proof follows in the same manner as Theorem 3.2 and 3.3.
8 D.K. PATEL, P.R. PATLE, L. BUDHIA, D. GOPAL Theorem 3.5. In addition to hypotheses of Theorem 3.-3.4, if f and g are weakly compatible, then they have a unique common fixed point in X. Proof. The proof follows from Proposition 2.. By taking g = i X identity mapping on X and C G = 0 in Theorem 3.5, we get the following result of Kumam et al. [7] as a corollary. Corollary 3.6. Let X,d be a complete metric space and f : X X be a suzuki type Z-contraction with respect to ζ. Then f has a unique fixed point x in X. Remark 3.. We observedthatthe PropertyKassumedin the mainresulttheorem 2. of Kumam et al. [7] is not required if the mapping f is asymptotically regular at every x X. Example 3.. Let X = [0,] and d be the usual metric on X. Define f,g : X X as follows: 0 if x [0, 4 ], x 3 if x [0, 4 fx = 20 if x ], 4, 2, and gx = 4 if x 4, 2, 4 25 if x [ 2,] 3 if x [ 2,]. Consider the functions ζt,s = 4 5 s t, Gs,t = s t and C G = 0, then for x 4, [ 2 and y 2,], the mapping f and g do not satisfy the condition 2. and hence Theorem 2. of Radenovic and Chandok [2] is not applicable. However, f is a Suzuki type Z G,g-contraction as well as Suzuki type generalized Z G,g- contraction and satisfy all the assumption of Theorem 3. and 3.3. Here f and g have a unique coincidence point x = 0. Also, the mappings are weakly compatible. Example 3.2. Let X = {0,0,3,3,4,0,0,4,4,5,5,4} be a metric space endowed with the metric d defined by dx,x 2,y,y 2 = x y + x 2 y 2. Let f,g : X X defined by 0,0 if x = x 2, fx,x 2 = x,0 if x < x 2, 0,x 2 if x > x 2, { 4,0 if x = x 2 = 3, gx,x 2 = x,x 2 otherwise. Consider the functions ζt,s = 4 5 s t, Gs,t = s t and C G = 0, then we note that 0 ζ dfx,fy,mx,y { } holds if x,y / 4,5,5,4, 5,4,4,5. Since in this case dgx,fx dgx,gy, 2
COINCIDENCE POINT RESULTS 9 so f is a Suzuki type generalized Z G,g-contraction. Also, f and g satisfy all hypothesis of Theorem 3.5 with the unique common fixed point x,x 2 = 0,0. Notice that ζ dfx,fy,mx,y < 0 { } whenever x, y 4,5,5,4, 5,4,4,5. So the mapping f does not satisfy the condition 2. and 2.2 and hence Theorem 2. and 2.3 of Radenovic and Chandok [2] are not applicable. 4. Coincidence points of rational type quasi-contractions If f and g be two self-mappings on a metric space X,d satisfying fx gx and x 0 X, let us define x X such that fx 0 = gx. Having defined x n X, let x n+ X be such that fx n = gx n+. We say that {fx n } is a f- g-sequence of initial point x 0. Letting fx n = gx n+ = y n, where n N {0}, denote Oy k ;n = {y k,y k+,y k+2,,y k+n }. Let δ[oy k ;n] denotes the diameter of Oy k ;n. If δ[oy k ;n] > 0 for k,n N then we have δ[oy k ;n] = dy i,y j, where k i < j k +n. Definition 4.. A mapping G : [0, 2 R has a property CG m, if there exists an C G 0 such that s i Gs,t > C G implies s+ > t, ii Gt,t C G for all t [0,. Denote mx,y = max{dgx,gy,dgx,fx,dgy,fy,dgx,fy,dgy,fx}. Using the above property we prove following result: Theorem 4.. Let X,d be a metric space and f,g : X X be self-mappings satisfying the condition C G mx,y dfx,fy < Gmx,y,dfx,fy 4. mx,y+ where G : [0, 2 R is a C-class function. Assume that the following conditions hold: i fx gx, ii gx or fx is complete. iii if {t n } and {s n } are sequences in 0, such that lim t n = lim s n > 0 n n and t n < s n, then lim s n + sup sn n s n + t n < C G. Then f and g have unique point of coincidence. Proof. Suppose that the point of coincidence exists, then the uniqueness follows as: let u and u 2 be two distinct points of coincidence of f and g, i.e. u = fv = gv and u 2 = fv 2 = gv 2 for some v,v 2 X. Then using 4. and ii of Definition 4., we get C G mv,v 2 mv,v 2 + dfv,fv 2 < G = C G < Gdu,u 2,du,u 2 C G, mv,v 2,dfv,fv 2 which is a contradiction. Thus, the point of coincidence is unique.
0 D.K. PATEL, P.R. PATLE, L. BUDHIA, D. GOPAL Now, consider the sequences {x n } and {y n } defined as y n = fx n = gx n+ for all n N {0}, and assume that y n y n+ for all n N {0}. Taking x = x n,y = x n+ in 4., we have C G mx n,x n+ mx n,x n+ + dfx n,fx n+ < G mx n,x n+,dfx n,fx n+. Using i of Definition 4., we get which gives dfx n,fx n+ < mx n,x n+ mx n,x n+ + dy n,y n+ < max{dy n,y n,dy n,y n+,dy n,y n+ } max{dy n,y n,dy n,y n+,dy n,y n+ }+ i.e. δ[oy n ;] < δ[oy n ;2] δ[oy n ;2]+ or δ[oy n ;] < λ δ[oy n ;2], 4.2 where λ = <. Again using 4. and i of Definition 4., we δ[oy n ;2]+ get δ[oy n ;2] = dy r,y p, where n r < p n+ < max{dy r,y p,dy r,y r,dy p,y p,dy r,y p,dy p,y r } max{dy r,y p,dy r,y r,dy p,y p,dy r,y p,dy p,y r }+ i.e. δ[oy n ;2] < δ[oy n 2;3] δ[oy n 2 ;3]+ = λ 2δ[Oy n 2 ;3]. 4.3 From 4.2 and 4.3, we have Continuing in same manner, we get δ[oy n ;] < λ λ 2 δ[oy n 2 ;3]. 4.4 δ[oy n ;] < λ λ 2...λ n δ[oy 0 ;n+], 4.5 where δ[oy 0 ;n + ] = dy r,y q for some positive 0 r < q n + and λ i = δ[oy n i ;i+]+ <. Let λ = max{λ,λ 2,...,λ n }, then we have Now δ[oy n ;] < λ n δ[oy 0 ;n+]. 4.6 δ[oy 0 ;n+] = dy r,y q dy r,y r+ +dy r+,y q = dy r,y r+ +dfx r+,fx q dy r,y r+ +δ[oy,n] dy r,y r+ + δ[oy 0;n+] δ[oy 0 ;n+]+ = dy r,y r+ +βδ[oy 0 ;n+],
where β = COINCIDENCE POINT RESULTS <. Hence δ[oy 0 ;n+]+ Thus, from 4.6 and 4.7, we have δ[oy 0 ;n+] β dy r,y r+ 4.7 δ[oy n ;] < λn β dy 0,y 4.8 with r = 0. Therefore, because of λ <, we get dy n,y n+ 0 as n. 4.9 Now, we claim that the sequence {y n } is Cauchy. If not, then by Lemma 2.2 we have lim dx mk,x nk = lim dx mk+,x nk+ = ε, k k and consequently, lim mx mk+,x nk+ = ε. k Also, from 4. and i of Definition 4., we have dy mk+,y nk+ < mx mk+,x nk+ mx mk+,x nk+ +. So by assumption iii, we get C G lim sup mxmk+,x nk+ k mx mk+,x nk+ + dy mk+,y nk+ < C G, 4.0 a contradiction. Hence {y n } is a Cauchy sequence. Now, suppose gx is complete subspace of X. Then there exists a point, say z X such that y n gz, i.e. gx n gz as n. We will show that z is the coincidence point of f and g. We can suppose y n fz,gz for n N {0}, otherwise we are done. Now, using 4. for x = x n and y = z, we have C G mx n,z mx n,z+ dfx n,fz < G mx n,z,dfx n,fz, and then by i of Definition 4., we get dfx n,fz < mx n,z. If we assume mx n,z+ fz gz, then taking limit as n, we get dgz,fz < dgz,fz, a contradiction. Hence gz = fz. In case fx is a complete subspace of X, the sequence {y n } converges in gx since fx gx. In same manner we can show that gz = fz. Example 4.. Let X = 2,2 be a metric space endowed with metric dx,y = x y. Let f and g be self-mappings on X defined by 0 if 2 < x < and < x < 2, +x fx = if x < 0, 3 x if 0 x, 3
2 D.K. PATEL, P.R. PATLE, L. BUDHIA, D. GOPAL if 2 < x, gx = x if < x <, if x < 2. Here Jungck s theorem [] is not applicable since the mapping g is discontinuous. However, for Gs,t = s t and C G = 0, f and g satisfy all hypothesis of Theorem 4. with the unique coincidence point x = 4. Remark 4.. Let mx,y = s and dfx,fy = t for x,y X with the metric d. Define a function ζ : [0, 2 R by ζt,s = s s+ t, then clearly ζ Z G. We also observed that the Theorem 4. is an approach to provide an partial answer to the question posed by Radenovic and Chandok in [2]. Let mx,y = s and dfx,fy = t for x,y X with the metric d. Define a function ζ : [0, 2 R by ζt,s = s s+ t, then clearly ζ Z G. We also observed that the Theorem 4. is an approach to provide an partial answer to the question posed by Radenovic and Chandok in [2]. We conclude this section with the following open question: Question: Whether the Theorem 4. holds when the condition 4. is replaced with 2 dgx,fx < dgx,gy C G mx,y dfx,fy < Gmx,y,dfx,fy? mx,y+ References [] Abbas M., Jungck J., Common fixed point results for non-commuting mappings without continuity in cone metric spaces, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 2008, 34, 46-420. [2] Ansari A., Note on ϕ-ψ-contractive type mappings and related fixed point, The 2nd Regional Conference on Math. Appl. PNU 377-380 Sept. 204. [3] Ansari A., Isik H., Radenovic S., Coupled fixed point theorems for contractive mappings involving new function classes and applications, Filomat, 207, 3 7, 893-907. [4] Argoubi H., Samet B., Vetro C., Nonlinear contractions involving simulation functions in a metric space with a partial order, J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl., 205, 8, 082-094. [5] Ciric L., A generalization of Banachs contraction principle, Proc. Am. Math. Soc., 974, 45, 267-273. [6] Chen J., Tang X., Generalizations of Darbos fixed point theorem via simulation functions with application to functional integral equations, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 206, 296, 564-575. [7] Edelstein M., On fixed and periodic points under contractive mappings, J. of the London Math. Soc. II, 962, 37, 74-79. [8] R.-L.-de-Hierro A., Karapinar E., R.-L.-de-Hierro C., Moreno J., Coincidence point theorems on metric spaces via simulation functions, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 205, 275, 345-355. [9] R.-L.-de-Hierro A., Samet B., ϕ-admissibility results via extended simulation functions, J. Fixed Point Theory Appl., 206, DOI 0.007/s784-06-0385. [0] Jungck G., Commuting maps and fixed points, Amer. Math. Month., 976, 83, 26-263. [] Jungck G., Common fixed points for noncontinuous nonself maps on nonmetric spaces, Far East J. Math. Sci., 996, 4, 99-25. [2] Kannan R., Some results on fixed points, Bull. of the Calcutta Math. Soc., 968, 60, 7-76. [3] Karapinar E., Fixed points results via simulation functions, Filomat, 206, 30 8, 2343-2350. [4] Karapinar E., Khojasteh F., An approach to best proximity points results via simulation functions, J. Fixed Point Theory Appl., 206, DOI 0. 007/s784-06-0380-2. [5] Khojasteh F., Shukla S., Radenovic S., A new approach to the study of fixed point theorems via simulation functions, Filomat, 205, 296, 89-94.
COINCIDENCE POINT RESULTS 3 [6] Komal S., Kumam P., Gopal D., Best proximity point for Z-contraction and Suzuki type Z- contraction mappings with an application to fractional calculus, Applied General Topology, 206, 7, 85-98. [7] Kumam P., Gopal D., Budhia L., A new fixed point theorem under Suzuki type Z-contraction mapping, Journal of Mathematical Analysis, 207, 8, 3-9. [8] Nastasi A., Vetro P., Fixed point results on metric and partial metric spaces via simulation functions, J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl., 205, 8, 059-069. [9] Olgun M., Bicer O., Alyildiz T., A new aspect to Picard operators with simulation functions, Turk. J. Math., 206, 40, 832-837. [20] Pant R., Singh S., Mishra S., A coincidence and fixed point theorems For semi-quasi contractions, Fixed Point Theory, 206, 7 2, 449-456. [2] Radenovic S., Chandok S., Simulation type functions and coincidence point results, Filomat to appear. [22] Radenovic S., Vetro F., Vujakovic J., An alternative and easy approach to fixed point results via simulation functions, Demonstr. Math., 207, -9. [23] Reich S., Kannans fixed point theorem, Boll. Un. Mat. Ital., 97, 4, -. [24] Reich S., Some remarks concerning contraction mappings, Canadian Mathematical Bulletin, 97, 4, 2-24. [25] Reich S., Fixed points of contractive functions, Boll. Un. Mat. Ital., 972, 5, 26-42 [26] Samet B., Best proximity point results in partially ordered metric spaces via simulation functions, Fixed Point Theory Appl., 205, Article ID 232. [27] Suzuki T., A generalized Banach contraction principle that characterizes metric completeness, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 2008 36 5, 86-869. [28] Suzuki T., A new type of fixed point theorem in metric spaces, Nonlinear Anal., 2009, 7, 533-537. [29] Tchier F., Vetro C., Vetro F., Best approximation and variational inequality problems involving a simulation function, Fixed Point Theory Appl. 206, Article ID 26. D.K. Patel Department of Mathematics, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur- 44000, India E-mail address: deepesh456@gmail.com P.R. Patle Department of Mathematics, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur- 44000, India E-mail address: pradip.patle2@gmail.com L. Budhia Department of Applied Mathematics & Humanities, S.V. National Institute of Technology, Surat-395007, India E-mail address: lokesh86budhia@gmail.com D. Gopal Department of Applied Mathematics & Humanities, S.V. National Institute of Technology, Surat-395007, India E-mail address: gopaldhananjay@yahoo.in