Thallus 1. Growth form 2. Rosette presence 3. Rosette maximum size 4. Attachment to substrate 5. Thallus color

Similar documents
Phylogenetic study of Diploschistes (lichen-forming Ascomycota: Ostropales: Graphidaceae), based on morphological, chemical, and molecular data

Caloplaca citrina and C. lactea are incorrectly understood in the British Isles

Key to Dermatocarpon of the Pacific Northwest

Caloplaca aurantia. Caloplaca flavescens

Phaeocalicium populneum

Verlag Alexander Just: Dorfbeuern - Salzburg - Brüssel; download unter Kartierung der P'eltigera-Arten in Rumänien

Department of Botany, University of Dhaka, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh. Key words: Seaweeds, Marine algae, Kallymenia spp., St. Martin's Is.

Integrative Biology 200 "PRINCIPLES OF PHYLOGENETICS" Spring 2018 University of California, Berkeley

Bayesian Phylogenetics:

COLONIZATION OF MOSAICS BY LICHENS: TUE CASE STUDY OF ITALICA (SPAIN)

A Bayesian Approach to Phylogenetics

Molecular Evolution & Phylogenetics

Casey Bickford & Derek Sikes. University of Alaska Museum

Bayesian Networks in Educational Assessment

A New Locality of Fossombronia mylioides (Fossombroniaceae, Marchantiophyta)

Kodo millet (Paspalum scorbiculatum L.)

Research Article Further Investigations on Rhizocarpon of North-Eastern Iran: R. geographicum

Some of these slides have been borrowed from Dr. Paul Lewis, Dr. Joe Felsenstein. Thanks!

Maximum Likelihood Tree Estimation. Carrie Tribble IB Feb 2018

POPULATION GENETICS Winter 2005 Lecture 17 Molecular phylogenetics

Systematics - Bio 615

Phylogenetics: Bayesian Phylogenetic Analysis. COMP Spring 2015 Luay Nakhleh, Rice University

Kingdom Fungi. Learning Objectives. Introduction. Activity1: Zygomycota. Revised Fall 2017

Phylogenetic Inference using RevBayes

MYCOTAXON. Volume 108, pp April June Polycauliona maheui, the basionym of Rhizoplaca maheui comb. nov. *

Bayesian phylogenetics. the one true tree? Bayesian phylogenetics

III Conduct of tests:

Ultramicromorphological observation of Usnea longissima Ach.

European Union Community Plant Variety Office

Short guide to some common mycological terms

Overview. Revised through 30 June Initial Groups ("naked-eye" characters)

Tassiloa, a new genus in the Teloschistaceae (lichenized ascomycetes)

EPIPHYTIC LICHENS AS ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATORS: PART I: Introduction to structure and biology

Who was Bayes? Bayesian Phylogenetics. What is Bayes Theorem?

Bayesian Phylogenetics

GROWTH OF LICHENS ON LIMESTONE OUTCROPS IN NORTHERN ESTONIA

Preliminaries. Download PAUP* from: Tuesday, July 19, 16

Constructing Evolutionary/Phylogenetic Trees

Bayesian Inference using Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Phylogenetic Studies

A REVISION OF THE LECANORA DISPERSA COMPLEX IN NORTH AMERICA LUCYNA ŚLIWA

ARE PLAGIOTHECIUM CAVIFOLIUM, P. NEMORALE AND P. SUCCULENTUM INDEED VARIABLE SPECIES?

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Lecania sipmanii, a new epiphytic lichen species from Syria

"PRINCIPLES OF PHYLOGENETICS: ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION" Integrative Biology 200B Spring 2011 University of California, Berkeley

Taxonomy. Content. How to determine & classify a species. Phylogeny and evolution

Two new species of Graphis (Ascomycota: Ostropales: Graphidaceae), from the Indo-Burma biodiversity hotspot

Three Monte Carlo Models. of Faunal Evolution PUBLISHED BY NATURAL HISTORY THE AMERICAN MUSEUM SYDNEY ANDERSON AND CHARLES S.

Phylogenetics: Building Phylogenetic Trees. COMP Fall 2010 Luay Nakhleh, Rice University

Amira A. AL-Hosary PhD of infectious diseases Department of Animal Medicine (Infectious Diseases) Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Assiut

Erasing Errors Due to Alignment Ambiguity When Estimating Positive Selection

Homoplasy. Selection of models of molecular evolution. Evolutionary correction. Saturation

A New Species of Schaereria (Lichenized Fungi) from the Falkland Islands

Integrative Biology 200A "PRINCIPLES OF PHYLOGENETICS" Spring 2012 University of California, Berkeley

Nadia Langha Biology 106 Honors Project

Fungal Symbiosis. Lichens and Mycorrhizae. Symbiosis Defined. Variations in Symbiosis. Variations in Symbioses. According to Encarte Dictionary

Consensus Methods. * You are only responsible for the first two

Constructing Evolutionary/Phylogenetic Trees

Phylogeny of Mixture Models

Dr. Amira A. AL-Hosary

Concepts and Methods in Molecular Divergence Time Estimation

Hastings Ratio of the LOCAL Proposal Used in Bayesian Phylogenetics

[279] A NOTE ON THE ORIGIN OF LATERAL ROOTS AND THE STRUCTURE OF THE ROOT-APEX OF LYGINOPTERIS OLDHAMIA

Using phylogenetics to estimate species divergence times... Basics and basic issues for Bayesian inference of divergence times (plus some digression)

Intraspecific gene genealogies: trees grafting into networks

SpeciesNetwork Tutorial

The Life System and Environmental & Evolutionary Biology II

Comparing Priors in Bayesian Logistic Regression for Sensorial Classification of Rice

Algorithms in Bioinformatics

Biological soil crust distribution on the Boardman Conservation Area: Results from 2009 monitoring

Phylogenetics: Building Phylogenetic Trees

Overview of Ascomycota

PROTOCOL FOR DISTINCTNESS, UNIFORMITY AND STABILITY TESTS

CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE LICHEN FLORA OF THE HIMALAYAS III*. ON LECANORA SOMERVELLII PAULSON (LICHENIZED ASCOMYCOTINA, LECANORACEAE)

A handful of primary features are useful for distinguishing water primrose (Ludwigia) from other plants. Understand what to look for, such as leaf

STAT 425: Introduction to Bayesian Analysis

TheDisk-Covering MethodforTree Reconstruction

Microthyriales of Tierra del Fuego I: The Genus Parasterinella SPEGAZZINI

Notoparmelia, a new genus of Parmeliaceae (Ascomycota) based on overlooked reproductive anatomical features, phylogeny and distribution pattern

A Contribution to the Phylogeny of the Ciidae and its Relationships with Other Cucujoid and Tenebrionoid Beetles (Coleoptera: Cucujiformia)

The differentiation of sterile thalli of Aneura and Pellia and the problem of Pellia species with unistratose margins

Lecture 5. G. Cowan Lectures on Statistical Data Analysis Lecture 5 page 1

12.1 INTRODUCTION 12.2 RANGE OF STRUCTURE IN LICHENS. Objectives Lichens As Individual Organisms

How should we go about modeling this? Model parameters? Time Substitution rate Can we observe time or subst. rate? What can we observe?

A Study of the Moss Parasite Eocronartium muscicola By: Alicia Knudson Advisor: Dr. Elizabeth Frieders

Multilevel Statistical Models: 3 rd edition, 2003 Contents

First records of two freshwater lichens, Hydropunctaria scabra and Verrucaria alpicola, from Bulgaria

SPORE-FORMS IN SPOROPHORES OF GANODERMA LUCIDUM (LEYSS.) KARST.

Non-independence in Statistical Tests for Discrete Cross-species Data

Biol 206/306 Advanced Biostatistics Lab 12 Bayesian Inference

C3020 Molecular Evolution. Exercises #3: Phylogenetics

Bayesian inference & Markov chain Monte Carlo. Note 1: Many slides for this lecture were kindly provided by Paul Lewis and Mark Holder

Inferring Molecular Phylogeny

Two new species of Cryptophagus HERBST, 1792 (Coleoptera: Cryptophagidae) from New Mexico (United States of America)

TECHNICAL WORKING PARTY FOR AGRICULTURAL CROPS. Twenty-Ninth Session Uppsala, Sweden, June 27 to 30, 2000

Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Facultat de Filosofia i Lletres Departament de Prehistòria Doctorat en arqueologia prehistòrica

Bayesian Learning in Undirected Graphical Models

The statistical and informatics challenges posed by ascertainment biases in phylogenetic data collection

APOTHECIAL ANATOMY OF SOME PARMELIA SPECIES OF NAMOBUDHA, KAVREPALANCHOWK DISTRICT, CENTRAL NEPAL

A monograph of the genus Placomaronea (Ascomycota, Candelariales)

"PRINCIPLES OF PHYLOGENETICS: ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION" Integrative Biology 200B Spring 2009 University of California, Berkeley

Transcription:

MATERIALS AND METHODS SUPPLEMENT 1. List of the 57 anatomical, morphological and ecological characters considered potentially useful for the phylogenetic analysis. The numbered characters correspond to those included in the analysis. The 19 characters that were excluded for at least one of the reasons detailed in the materials and methods section are marked with an asterisk. Thallus 1. Growth form: 0 = crustose-placodioid; 1 = foliose; 2 = fruticose; 3 = squamulose. 2. Rosette presence: 0 = without well-delimited rosettes; 1 = with well-delimited rosettes; 2 = forming clusters. Although cluster formation can be related to environmental factors, especially to the availability of organic matter, it appeared as a constant trait in the specimens of typical C. saxicola and sporadically in specimens of other taxa (e.g., C. arnoldii ssp. obliterata). Clauzade and Roux (1985) used this character to distinguish what they called C. saxicola ssp. obliterata, and Wetmore and Kärnefelt (1998) described one of the morphotypes of C. saxicola based on the formation of clusters. 3. Rosette maximum size: 0 = small ( 11 mm, average = 6.08); 1 = large (> 11 mm, average = 16.29). The largest sizes were found in C. biatorina, C. arnoldii ssp. clauzadeana and in some specimens of C. pusilla. 4. Attachment to substrate: 0 = loosely attached; 1 = tightly attached. This character was coded independently of the presence/absence of a lower cortex. The type of attachment has been often used in the literature to distinguish among different species with lobed thalli (e.g., Poelt and Hinteregger 1993, Arup 1995, Wetmore and Kärnefelt 1998). Poelt and Hinteregger (1993) differentiated C. biatorina based on the attachment to the substrate by means of a narrow longitudinal bundle that goes through the lobes. As we did not observe this character state it was not considered. 5. Thallus color: 0 = yellow glaucous (240); 1 = yellow (211-215, 226-230, 242-245); 2 = ochraceous-orange (246-247); 3 = orange (196-197); 4 = lead red, scarlet-orange, terra cotta (181-182); 5 = brownish-orange (186-187, 191-193, 201-203); 6 = salmon (169-170, 174-175, 179-180, 183-185, 189-190, 194-195, 198-200, 204-205); 7 = red (151-153, 156-158, 166-168); 8 = dark red, burgundy (171-173). The numbers in parentheses refer to the color-coding that follows the Code Universel des Couleurs (Séguy 1936). The character states were ordered from the lightest color (yellow) to the darkest (red). *Thallus thickness: µm. 6. Pruina on upper cortex: 0 = absent; 1 = present. *Upper cortex thickness: µm. 7. Upper cortex texture: 0 = para-scleroplectenchymatous; 1 = scleroplectenchymatous type A; 2 = scleroplectenchymatous type B; 3 = sclero-prosoplectenchymatous. Definitions following Gaya (2005, 2009).

*Upper cortex cells diameter: µm. 8. Pseudocyphella-like discolored patches presence: 0 = absent; 1 = present. In some taxa, such as C. rouxii, discolored patches on the surface of the thallus are present, as a result of the irregular thinning of the upper cortex. These can resemble true pseudocyphella, and were coded as present. *Algal layer thickness: µm. *Algal cell diameter: µm. *Medulla density: 0 = lax; 1 = dense. *Hypha thickness in medulla: µm. 9. Lower cortex presence: 0 = absent; 1 = present. The presence of a lower cortex allows the separation of the three Xanthoria species from Caloplaca. 10. Rhizine or hapter presence: 0 = absent; 1 = present. Their presence also characterizes the three Xanthoria species. 11. Areole presence: 0 = absent; 1 = present. 12. Areole shape I: 0 = flat; 1 = convex. *Areole shape II: 0 = polygonal; 1 = irregular, lobe fragments; 2 = granular or verrucose. 13. Lobe-habit I: 0 = decumbent, dorsiventral, prostrate; 1 = rising at the apex, prominent, erect. 14. Lobe-habit II: 0 = flat; 1= convex; 2 = strongly convex, subcylindrical. 15. Lobe-habit III: 0 = not broadening at the apex; 1 = broadening at the apex. 16. Lobe-habit IV: 0 = non-contiguous, non-overlapping; 1 = contiguous, overlapping. 17. Lobe division type: 0 = simple 1 = branched/divided 2 = highly branched (2-3 times). 18. Lobe maximum length: 0 = short lobes (average = 0.92 mm); 1= long lobes (average = 2.61 mm). 19. Lobe maximum width: 0 = narrow lobes (average = 0.54 mm); 1 = broad lobes (average = 0.92 mm); 2 = very broad lobes (average = 1.31 mm). 20. Vegetative propagule presence: 0 = absent; 1 = present. We decided to include both soredia and isidia, without distinguishing the two, as in our study we only had three occurrences of vegetative propagules: two taxa with soredia (C. decipiens, X. candelaria) and one with isidia (X. sorediata). *Pycnidium length: µm. *Pycnidium width: µm. Apothecium 21. Apothecium presence: 0 = absent (or rarely present); 1 = present (always present). The presence of apothecia in C. decipiens has been mentioned in the literature (e.g., Poelt 1954, 1969, Wade 1965, Verseghy 1970, Nordin 1972, Egea 1984, Purvis et al 1992, Wetmore and Kärnefelt 1998) always stressing its rarity. In our study, all examined specimens did not have apothecia. Therefore, we attributed state 0 to C. decipiens. The same state was allocated to Xanthoria candelaria and X. sorediata. The sporadic occurrence of apothecia is known from X. candelaria (Clauzade and Roux 1985, Poelt and Petutschnig 1992a, b, Purvis

et al 1992, Lindblom 1997) and, still more infrequently, from X. sorediata (Clauzade and Roux 1985, Poelt and Petutschnig 1992a, Giralt et al 1993, Lindblom 1997), but the specimens here considered were not fertile. 22. Apothecium type: 0 = pseudolecanorine; 1= lecanorine; 2 = zeorine. 23. Apothecium location: 0 = dispersed; 1 = grouped; 2 = forming clusters. *Apothecium diameter: µm. 24. Pruina on apothecium: 0 = absent; 1= present. *Disk shape: 0 = concave; 1 = flat; 2 = convex. 25. Disk color: 0 = yellow glaucous (240); 1 = yellow (211-215, 226-230, 242-245); 2 = ochraceous-orange (246-247); 3 = orange (196-197); 4 = lead red, scarlet-orange, terra cotta (181-182); 5 = brownish-orange (186-187, 191-193, 201-203); 6 = salmon (169-170, 174-175, 179-180, 183-185, 189-190, 194-195, 198-200, 204-205); 7 = red (151-153, 156-158, 166-168); 8 = dark red, burgundy (171-173). *Margin persistence of mature apothecium: 0 = not persistent; 1 = persistent. 26. Margin height of mature apothecium: 0= not prominent; 1= prominent. 27. Margin texture of mature apothecium: 0 = smooth; 1 = granulose, rugose; 2 = slightly crenulate. 28. Hymenium maximum height: 0 = short (average = 64.58 µm); 1 = tall (average = 83.71 µm). 29. Parathecium maximum thickness: 0 = narrow (average = 70.32 µm); 1 = wide (average = 102.93 µm). *Hypothecium type: 0 = para-scleroplectenchymatous; 1 = scleroplectenchymatous type A; 2 = scleroplectenchymatous type B; 3 = sclero-prosoplectenchymatous. *Algal arrangement in apothecium: 0 = more or less continuous; 1 = forming distinct clusters. *Hyphal arrangement below the algal layer in apothecium: 0 = lax; 1 = compact. 30. Ascus maximum length: 0 = short (average = 51.28 µm); 1 = medium (average = 60.92 µm); 2 = long (average = 66.87 µm). 31. Ascus maximum width: 0 = very narrow (average = 12.13 µm); 1 = narrow (average = 14.52 µm); 2 = broad (average = 16.38 µm); 3 = very broad (average = 18.34 µm). 32. Paraphysis branching pattern: 0 = slightly branched; 1 = highly branched (more than two divisions). When describing species within the C. saxicola group (Gaya 2009), the type of branching, the degree of anastomosis, and the broadening of the apical cell were considered. However, in face of the impossibility of establishing clear limits for these characters, and given their high intraspecific variability, we thought more appropriate to code only the degree of branching, the only character that could be coded objectively. *Paraphysis thickness at apex: µm. *Broadened cell number: 0 = no cell; 1 = one cell; 2 = two or more cells (moniliform). 33. Ascospore length: 0 = short (average = 10.41 µm); 1 = long (average = 12.66 µm).

34. Ascospore width: 0 = very narrow (average = 4.73 µm); 1 = narrow (average = 5.64 µm); 2 = wide (average = 6.24 µm); 3 = very wide (average = 7.24 µm). 35. Ascospore equatorial thickening ( septum ): 0 = narrow (average = 2.74 µm); 1 = wide (average = 3.53 µm). 36. Ascospore shape (Length/Width ratio, L/W): 0 = wide ellipsoid (average = 1.95µm); 1 = narrow ellipsoid (average = 2.41 µm). 37. Ascospore length/equatorial thickening ( septum ), (L/Sept): 0 = equatorial thickening approx. 1/3 of the spore length (average = 3.2 µm); 1 = equatorial thickening approx. 1/4 of the spore length (average = 3.83 µm); 2 = equatorial thickening approx. 1/5 of the spore length (average = 5.07 µm); 3 = equatorial thickening nearly inexistent, approx. 1/19 of the spore length, spores typically septate (average = 18.85 µm). Ecology and Distribution 38. Substrate type: 0 = carbonate rock; 1 = non-carbonate rock; 2 = igneous rock; 3 = moss. *Biogeographic distribution: 0 = mediterranean/submediterranean; 1 = montane; 2 = subalpine/alpine/boreal. LITERATURE CITED Arup U. 1995. Eight species of Caloplaca in coastal western North America. Bryologist 98:92 111. Clauzade G, Roux C. 1985. Likenoj de Okcidenta Europo. B Soc Bot Centre-Ouest, Numéro Special 1:1 893. Egea JM. 1984. Contribución al conocimiento del género Caloplaca Th. Fr. en España: especies saxícolas. Collect Bot 15:173 204. Gaya E. 2005. Revisió morfològica dels tàxons lobulats del gènere Caloplaca (Teloschistaceae, Líquens), amb especial èmfasi en el grup de C. saxicola. http://www.tesisenxarxa.net/tdx- 0208107-124450. [Doctoral dissertation]. Barcelona: University of Barcelona.. 2009. Taxonomical revision on the Caloplaca saxicola group (Teloschistaceae, lichenforming Ascomycota). Bibl Lichen 101. J. Berlin, Suttgart: Cramer. Giralt M, Nimis PL, Poelt J. 1993. Studien über einige Arten der Flechtengattung Xanthoria mit isidiiformen vegetativen Diasporen. J Hattori Bot Lab 74:271 285. Lindblom L. 1997. The genus Xanthoria (Fr.) Th. Fr. in North America. J Hattori Bot Lab 83:75 171.

Nordin I. 1972. Caloplaca sect. Gasparrinia i Nordeuropa. Taxonomiska och Ekologiska Studier. [Doctoral dissertation]. Uppsala: Skriv Service AB. Poelt J. 1954. Die Gelappten arten der flechtengattung Caloplaca in Europa. Mitt Bot Staatssamml München 11:11 31.. 1969. Bestimmungsschlüssel europäischer Flechten. Lehre, Vaduz: J. Cramer., Hinteregger E. 1993. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Flechtenflora des Himalaya VII. Die Gattungen Caloplaca, Fulgensia und Ioplaca (mit englischem Bestimmungsschlüssel). Bibl Lichen 50. Berlin, Stuttgart: J. Cramer., Petutschnig W. 1992a. Xanthoria candelaria und ähnliche Arten in Europa. Herzogia 9:103 114.,. 1992b. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Flechtenflora des Himalaya IV. Die Gattungen Xanthoria und Teloschistes zugleich Versuch einer Revision der Xanthoria candelaria-gruppe. Nova Hedwigia 54:1 36. Purvis OW, Coppins BJ, Hawksworth DL, James PW, Moore DM. 1992. The Lichen Flora of Great Britain and Ireland. London: Natural History Museum Publications. Séguy E. 1936. Code Universel des Colours. Encyclopédie Practique du Naturaliste 30. Paris: P. Lechevalier. Verseghy K. 1970. Hazai Gasparrinia fajok. I. Bot. Közlem. 57:23 29. Wade AE. 1965. The Genus Caloplaca Th. Fr. in the British Isles. Lichenologist 3:1 28. Wetmore CM, Kärnefelt I. 1998. The lobate and subfruticose species of Caloplaca in North and Central America. Bryologist 101:230 255.

MATERIALS AND METHODS SUPPLEMENT 2. PARAMETER DESCRIPTION FOR THE THREE SUBSTITUTION MODELS SELECTED IN THE THREE ML SEARCHES TrN+G (Tamura and Nei 1993) in HLRT (ML1): base frequencies (A = 0.1912, C = 0.3023, G = 0.2683, T = 0.2383), rate substitution matrix (A < > C = 1.0000, A < > G = 2.8920, A < > T = 1.0000, C < > G = 1.0000, C < > T = 5.3436, G < > T = 1.0000), and rates for variable sites assuming to follow a gamma distribution with shape parameter 0.2418. GTR+I+G (Lanave et al 1984) in AIC (ML2): base frequencies (A = 0.1791, C = 0.3093, G = 0.2787, T = 0.2328), rate substitution matrix (A < > C = 1.1869, A < > G = 3.8086, A < > T = 2.6292, C < > G = 0.8630, C < > T = 6.7783, G < > T = 1.0000), rates for variable sites assuming to follow a gamma distribution with shape parameter 0.7269, and proportion of invariable sites I = 0.4204. HKY+G (Hasegawa-Kishino-Yano 1985) in the HLRT calculated in PAUP* with a top-down approximation (ML3): base frequencies (A = 0.1797, C = 0.3146, G = 0.2571, T = 0.2486), ti/tv ratio = 2.1501, and rates for variable sites assuming to follow a gamma distribution with shape parameter 0.2238 CONVERGENCE EXAMINATION IN BALI-PHY ANALYSES Determining stabilization times In order to determine the number of initial iterations to discard as burnin, we determined stabilization times for each numerical parameter and for the likelihood, prior, probability, and total tree length. We additionally computed stabilization times for the following quantities for each partition and for the total alignment: the parsimony tree length, the number of indel events, the summed length of all indel events, and the alignment length. After initially examining these values by visual inspection using the software Tracer (Rambaut and Drummond 2007), we proceeded to design a specific criterion for assessing stabilization. We counted a particular series of values as having stabilized after the series crosses its upper and then lower 90% confidence bounds twice (if the initial value is below the median) or crosses its lower and then upper confidence bounds twice (if the initial value is above the median). Here the confidence bounds are those based on its equilibrium distribution as calculated from the last third of the values in the sequence. According to this criterion, every sequence of values from each of the 6 runs in the B2 analysis stabilized by iteration 227. We also wished to assess the stabilization of topologies, because the stabilization of log likelihood values and continuous parameter values need not imply that the topology has stabilized (Nylander et al 2008). Therefore, the Robinson-Foulds (1981) distance of the topology at each iteration from the equilibrium distribution of topologies following Redelings and Suchard (2007) were compared. We then approximated the equilibrium distribution by collecting 100 widely spaced tree samples from the last third of each of the 6 runs to obtain a total of 600 trees. Using the stabilization criterion described above, we found that this distance to the equilibrium stabilized by iteration 1320 in each of the 6 runs of the B2 analysis. Determining Potential Scale Reduction Factors We assessed convergence after stabilization by computing potential scale reduction factors (PSRF) based on the length of 80% credible intervals (Brooks and Gelman 1998). The PSRF is customarily considered to be small enough if it is less than 0.01. This convergence diagnostic gives a criterion for detecting when a parameter value has stabilized at different values in several independent runs, indicating a lack of convergence. This situation might occur if different runs of

the Markov chain were trapped in different modes and failed to adequately mix between modes. We computed a PSRF for every continuous model parameter, and also for the likelihood, the prior, the probability, and the total tree length. In each case the PSRF was less than 1.002, and so no lack of convergence was detected. Effective Sample Sizes (ESS) for split frequencies We also estimated effective sample sizes for the posterior probability of each split with PP > 0.1. A series of binary values for each split that indicates whether it is supported (1) or unsupported (0) in each iteration were constructed. We then computed the integrated autocorrelation time for this binary sequence in order to compute an effective sample size for each split; the larger the autocorrelation time, the smaller the effective sample size. For every split, after removing the first 10 000 values from each run as burnin and pooling the remaining values, the effective sample size for the combined result was greater than 782, and in most cases near the maximum of 54 000. This indicates that, even in the case of the worst mixing partition, we still obtained the equivalent of about 782 independent samples. While this does suggest that the estimate of the posterior probability for this split has a higher variance than other splits, an effective size of 782 indicates that none of the 6 runs had a substantially different mean. LITERATURE CITED Brooks S, Gelman A. 1998. Some issues in monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. In Proceedings of the Section on Statistical Computing. ASA. Nylander JAA, Wilgenbusch JC, Warren DL, Swofford DL. 2008. Awty (are we there yet?): a system for graphical exploration of mcmc convergence in bayesian phylogenetics. Bioinformatics 24:581 583. Rambaut A, Drummond A. 2007. Tracer. Available from http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/tracer. Redelings BD, Suchard MA. 2007. Incorporating indel information into phylogeny estimation for rapidly emerging pathogens. BMC Evo Bio 7:40. Robinson DF, Foulds LR. 1981. Comparison of phylogenetic trees. Math Biosci 53:131 147.