G : Quantum Mechanics II

Similar documents
Wigner 3-j Symbols. D j 2. m 2,m 2 (ˆn, θ)(j, m j 1,m 1; j 2,m 2). (7)

Are these states normalized? A) Yes

Lecture 19 (Nov. 15, 2017)

Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 14 Coupling of Angular Momenta

Addition of Angular Momenta

Angular Momentum in Quantum Mechanics

Coupling of Angular Momenta Isospin Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction

Representations of angular momentum

Adding angular momenta

MAT265 Mathematical Quantum Mechanics Brief Review of the Representations of SU(2)

Alkali metals show splitting of spectral lines in absence of magnetic field. s lines not split p, d lines split

Angular Momentum. Classical. J r p. radius vector from origin. linear momentum. determinant form of cross product iˆ xˆ J J J J J J

Basic Physical Chemistry Lecture 2. Keisuke Goda Summer Semester 2015

Quantum Mechanics Solutions

Rotations in Quantum Mechanics

QM and Angular Momentum

Introduction to Heisenberg model. Javier Junquera

Quantum Mechanics Solutions. λ i λ j v j v j v i v i.

d 3 r d 3 vf( r, v) = N (2) = CV C = n where n N/V is the total number of molecules per unit volume. Hence e βmv2 /2 d 3 rd 3 v (5)

which implies that we can take solutions which are simultaneous eigen functions of

Representations of Lorentz Group

Lecture 10. The Dirac equation. WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics

Chem 3502/4502 Physical Chemistry II (Quantum Mechanics) 3 Credits Spring Semester 2006 Christopher J. Cramer. Lecture 20, March 8, 2006

Attempts at relativistic QM

( ) dσ 1 dσ 2 + α * 2

Plan for the rest of the semester. ψ a

PAPER :8, PHYSICAL SPECTROSCOPY MODULE: 29, MOLECULAR TERM SYMBOLS AND SELECTION RULES FOR DIATOMIC MOLECULES

GROUP THEORY IN PHYSICS

Implications of Time-Reversal Symmetry in Quantum Mechanics

Solutions Final exam 633

arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 20 Apr 1995

Parity P : x x, t t, (1.116a) Time reversal T : x x, t t. (1.116b)

The quantum state as a vector

The Klein-Gordon equation

Quantum Physics II (8.05) Fall 2002 Assignment 12 and Study Aid

Angular Momentum Algebra

16.2 Coupling of angular momentum operators: The Clebsch Gordon coefficients and the Wigner 3j symbols. J(i) (16.62) J = i

Time Independent Perturbation Theory

1 Fundamental physical postulates. C/CS/Phys C191 Quantum Mechanics in a Nutshell I 10/04/07 Fall 2007 Lecture 12

Multi-Electron Atoms II

G : Quantum Mechanics II

Time Independent Perturbation Theory Contd.

Problem 1: Spin 1 2. particles (10 points)

Lecture 11 Weak interactions, Cabbibo-angle. angle. SS2011: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics, Part 2

Nuclear models: Collective Nuclear Models (part 2)

Notes on SU(3) and the Quark Model

Chem 3502/4502 Physical Chemistry II (Quantum Mechanics) 3 Credits Spring Semester 2006 Christopher J. Cramer. Lecture 22, March 20, 2006

The 3 dimensional Schrödinger Equation

Clebsch-Gordan Coefficients

For example, in one dimension if we had two particles in a one-dimensional infinite potential well described by the following two wave functions.

Symmetries, Groups, and Conservation Laws

CHM Physical Chemistry II Chapter 9 - Supplementary Material. 1. Constuction of orbitals from the spherical harmonics

Chemistry 120A 2nd Midterm. 1. (36 pts) For this question, recall the energy levels of the Hydrogenic Hamiltonian (1-electron):

Solution Set of Homework # 6 Monday, December 12, Textbook: Claude Cohen Tannoudji, Bernard Diu and Franck Laloë, Second Volume

Molecular Term Symbols

10 Time-Independent Perturbation Theory

PHYS852 Quantum Mechanics II, Spring 2010 HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT 8: Solutions. Topics covered: hydrogen fine structure

Quantum Mechanics- I Prof. Dr. S. Lakshmi Bala Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

3.5 Finite Rotations in 3D Euclidean Space and Angular Momentum in QM

9 Electron orbits in atoms

Notes on Spin Operators and the Heisenberg Model. Physics : Winter, David G. Stroud

Select/Special Topics in Atomic Physics Prof. P. C. Deshmukh Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

J = L + S. to this ket and normalize it. In this way we get expressions for all the kets

Lecture #13 1. Incorporating a vector potential into the Hamiltonian 2. Spin postulates 3. Description of spin states 4. Identical particles in

QUANTUM MECHANIC S. Symmetries

Potential energy, from Coulomb's law. Potential is spherically symmetric. Therefore, solutions must have form

Quantization of the Spins

Allowed beta decay May 18, 2017

Fine structure in hydrogen - relativistic effects

Quantum mechanics in one hour

Quantum Mechanics I Physics 5701

Generators for Continuous Coordinate Transformations

Lecture 6. Fermion Pairing. WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics

The Framework of Quantum Mechanics

The general solution of Schrödinger equation in three dimensions (if V does not depend on time) are solutions of time-independent Schrödinger equation

Lecture 4 (Sep. 18, 2017)

The AKLT Model. Lecture 5. Amanda Young. Mathematics, UC Davis. MAT290-25, CRN 30216, Winter 2011, 01/31/11

I. CSFs Are Used to Express the Full N-Electron Wavefunction

CLEBSCH-GORDAN COEFFICIENTS - EXAMPLES

PHYS851 Quantum Mechanics I, Fall 2009 HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT 10: Solutions

(1.1) In particular, ψ( q 1, m 1 ; ; q N, m N ) 2 is the probability to find the first particle

Electronic Microstates & Term Symbols. Suggested reading: Shriver and Atkins, Chapter 20.3 or Douglas,

arxiv: v1 [physics.gen-ph] 21 Mar 2016

Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 21 Hyperfine Structure in Hydrogen and Alkali Atoms

Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 12 Orbital Angular Momentum and Spherical Harmonics

Physics 125 Course Notes Identical Particles Solutions to Problems F. Porter

Solutions to exam : 1FA352 Quantum Mechanics 10 hp 1

Chapter 10: Multi- Electron Atoms Optical Excitations

Numerical Table of Clebsch-Gordan Coefficients

Week 5-6: Lectures The Charged Scalar Field

Quantum indistinguishability: alternative constructions of the transported basis

Quantum Physics II (8.05) Fall 2002 Assignment 3

For the case of S = 1/2 the eigenfunctions of the z component of S are φ 1/2 and φ 1/2

Physics 221A Fall 2005 Homework 11 Due Thursday, November 17, 2005

Comparing and Improving Quark Models for the Triply Bottom Baryon Spectrum

Sommerfeld (1920) noted energy levels of Li deduced from spectroscopy looked like H, with slight adjustment of principal quantum number:

Theoretical Chemistry - Level II - Practical Class Molecular Orbitals in Diatomics

Structure of diatomic molecules

Lecture 6 Scattering theory Partial Wave Analysis. SS2011: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics, Part 2 2

1 Mathematical preliminaries

Transcription:

G5.666: Quantum Mechanics II Notes for Lecture 7 I. A SIMPLE EXAMPLE OF ANGULAR MOMENTUM ADDITION Given two spin-/ angular momenta, S and S, we define S S S The problem is to find the eigenstates of the total total spin operators S and S z and identify the allowed total spin states. In order to solve this problem, we recognize that the eigenvectors we seek will be expressible in terms of tensor products of the spin eigenstates of the individual spins. There will be four such vectors: ; ; ; ; Although this is a valid set of basis vectors for the full spin Hilbert space, these are not eigenvectors of S or S z. Thus, we seek a unitary transformation among these vectors that generates a new set of four vectors that are eigenvectors of S and S z. The four new vectors will correspond to adding the spins in either a parallel or anti-parallel fashion: Parallel Total Spin, m s, 0, 3 states Antiparallel Total Spin 0, m s 0 state for a total of four states, as expected. To find these states, begin by noting that the state ; is, in fact, an eigenstate of S and S z. To see this note that S z ; (S z S z ) ; h ; h h ; ; Also, since S (S S ) S S S S S S (S xs x S y S y S z S z ) S S S zs z (S S S S )

The action of S on S ; ; is [ S S S z S z ] ; (S S S S ) However, the second term on the right vanishes because each involves a raising operator acting on a state either the first or second spin, which annihilates the state. Thus, S ; [ S S S ] zs z ; [ ( ) h ( ) h h ] h ; ( 3 h 4 3 4 ) ; h ; ; for Thus, the eigenvalue of S is h ( ) h, corresponding to a value of s with a corresponding S z value of h. These facts make it clear that ; is a total spin- state s ms of the total spin: ; In order to find the the states corresponding to m s 0 and m s, we can use the total lowering operator: S S S Recall the general relation for the action of raising and lowering operators on general spin states: S ± s m s h s(s ) m s (m s ± ) s m s ± The procedure is, then, to act on both sides of with S : S S ; ; (S S ) ; On the left, we obtain h 0 so that h 0 (S S ) ; h ; h 0 [ ; ; ; ] Finally, the state with m s is obtained by acting again with the lowering operator: S 0 [ S ; ; ] [ (S S ) ; [ h S ; S ; ] h h ; h ; ; ; ]

The last state is 0 0 and is obtained by recognizing that it must be composed of those states that have opposite values of m s and m s. So we include these states with arbitrary coefficients: 0 0 α ; β ; The coefficients α and β are then determined by the conditions that 0 0 must be normalized and that it must be orthogonal to the other three states. The first condition yields: 0 0 0 0 α β In order to fulfill the second, we recognize that 0 0 is manifestly orthogonal to and. However, orthogonality to 0 needs to be enforced: ( ; 0 0 0 0 ; ) ( α (α β) 0 ; β ; ) 0 α β From the normalization condition, it is clear, then, that α ±/ so that β /. arbitrary, so we choose α / and β / so that 0 0 ( ; ; ) The choice of sign is Thus, the four new basis vectors are: ; (, ( ; ; ; ; ), ) ; We can write the transformation from the old basis to the new basis as a matrix equation: 0 0 0 ; 0 0 0 ; 0 0 0 ; 0 0 0 0 ; The matrix 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 can easily be shown to be unitary. Note that the elements of the matrix can be computed from the following overlaps: ; 3

; 0 ; 0 ; 0 0 ; 0 0 ; These are examples of what are known as Clebsch-Gordan coefficients. In the next section, we will study the general forms of these coefficients. Finally, note that the new basis vectors are, in fact, eigenvectors of S and S z. Thus, they satisfy S h S z h S 0 h 0 S z 0 0 S h S z h S 0 0 0 S z 0 0 0 The states, 0, form what are called the triplet states, corresponding to s. Note that these are symmetric with respect to exchange of the two spins. The state 0 0 is known as the singlet state as it is antisymmetric (changes sign) upon exchange of the spins. II. THE GENERAL PROBLEM The problem of adding two arbitrary angular moment J and J amounts to finding a unitary transformation from the set of basis vectors defined by the tensor products of the individual eigenstates of J and J z and J and J z to the eigenstates of J and J z, where The individual eigenstates of and satisfy J J J J j m j (j ) h j m J z j m m h j m J j m j (j ) h j m J z j m m h j m We may also define raising and lowering operators according to We then define the tensor product basis vectors as J ± j m h j (j ) m (m ± ) j m ± J ± j m h j (j ) m (m ± ) j m ± j m ; j m j m j m m j,..., j, m j,..., j and we seek a transformation to a set basis set denoted J M that satisfies J J M J(J ) h J M J z J M M h J M J ± J M h J(J ) M(M ± ) J M ± 4

The method of obtaining the transformation is simply to expand the new basis vectors in terms of the old: The coefficients J M j m j j m j j m ; j m j m ; j m J M j m ; j m J M are the general Clebsch-Gordan coefficients. In principle, they can be determined by the programmatic procedure outlined in the last section applied to the arbitrary angular momenta. Note that j m ; j m J M 0 unless m m M, which restricts the summations in the above expansion considerably. Although a general formula exists for Clebsch-Gordon coefficients (see below), let us first examine some of the properties of the coefficients that are useful in constructing the unitary transformation:. The Clebsch-Gordon coefficients are real: j m ; j m J M J M j m ; j m. Orthogonality: j j m j m j J M j m ; j m j m ; j m J M δ JJ δ MM This can be seen by recognizing that J M J M δ JJ δ MM so that if we insert an identity operator in the inner product in the form I j j m j m j j m ; j m j m ; j m the orthogonality relation results. A similar orthogonality relation is j j J J j j M J j m ; j m J M J M j m ; j m δ mm δ m m which can also be proved starting from and inserting identity in the form j m ; j m j m ; j m δ m m δ m m I j j J J j j M J J M J M Note that the label J is not a fixed label like j and j. This is because different total J values can result. The minimum value of J is clearly j j, while its maximum is j j, and we need to sum over these in the completeness relation. 5

3. Recursion relation: J(J ) M(M ± ) j m ; j m J M ± j (j ) m (m ) j m ± ; j m J M which can be derived starting from j (j ) m (m ) j m ; j m J M J ± J ± J and taking matrix elements of both sides between the new and old basis vectors: j m ; j m J ± J M j m ; j m J ± J M j m ; j m J ± J M On the left side, J ± acts on J M to produce the term on the left in the recursion relation. On the right, the operators J ± and J ± operate to the left as J ± and J ±. However, J ± J J ± J e and hence produce the opposite action as the J ± on the left. Finally, the general formula for the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients is j m ; j m J M δ mm,m [ (J ) (s J)!(s j )!(s j )! (j m )!(j m )!(j m )!(j m )!(J M)!(J M)! (s )! ν ( ) ν ν!(j j J ν)!(j m ν)!(j m ν)!(j j m ν)!(j j m ν)! where s j j J, and the ν summation runs over all values for which all of the factorial arguments are greater than or equal to 0. This formula is rather cumbersome to work with, so it is useful to deduce some special cases. These are as follows: i. ii. if m ±j or m ±j and M ±J, then j m ; j m J J j m ; j m J J j j ; j j J J (J )!(j ( ) j m j J)! (j m )!(j m )! (j j J )!(J j j )!(J j j )! (j m )!(j m )! ] / iii. If j j J, j m ; j m J M (j )!(j )! (J M)!(J M)! (J)! (j m )!(j m )!(j m )!(j m )! 6

III. THE SIMPLE EXAMPLE REVISITED Consider, again, the example of adding to spin-/ angular momenta. This time, we will use the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients directly to determine the unitary transformation. Start with the state. Expanding gives / / m / m / m ; m m ; m Only one term gives m m, which is clearly m / and m /. Thus, ; ; The Clebsch-Gordan coefficients, by special case i is just, so ; as expected. The state 0 is expanded as 0 / / m / m / m ; m m ; m 0 This time, since m m 0, two terms contribute, m /, m / and m /, m /. Hence, 0 ; ; 0 ; ; 0 However, since j j, we can use special case iii, and we find ;!!!! 0! ;!! 0! so that 0 ( ;!0!0!!!! 0!!!0! ; ) It is straightforward to show that ;. The state 0 0 is expanded to give / / 0 0 m ; m m ; m 0 0 m / m / Again there are two terms that contribute. However, to determine the two Clebsch-Gordan coefficients: ; 0 0 and ; 0 0 we can use special case ii, since M J. In this case, ; 0 0 ( )!!!0!!0!0! ; 0 0 ( )!!!0!0! Hence, the state is given by 0 0 ( ; 0!! 0!!!0! ; ) 7

IV. FINAL REMARKS Note finally, that the number of basis vectors is generally given by (j )(j ), and that this number is equal to j j J j j (J ) (j )(j ) Also, sometimes one sees the so called 3J symbols used instead of Clebsch-Gordan coefficients. This are denoted as ( j j ) J m m M and are related to the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients by ( ) j j J ( ) m m M J j m ; j m J M 8