Semiloof Curved Thin Shell Elements

Similar documents
3D Semiloof Thin Beam Elements

2D Kirchhoff Thin Beam Elements

Theoretical Manual Theoretical background to the Strand7 finite element analysis system

Chapter 12 Plate Bending Elements. Chapter 12 Plate Bending Elements

The Finite Element Method for Solid and Structural Mechanics

Using MATLAB and. Abaqus. Finite Element Analysis. Introduction to. Amar Khennane. Taylor & Francis Croup. Taylor & Francis Croup,

CAEFEM v9.5 Information

MAE 323: Chapter 6. Structural Models

MITOCW MITRES2_002S10linear_lec07_300k-mp4


Generic Strategies to Implement Material Grading in Finite Element Methods for Isotropic and Anisotropic Materials

Nonlinear FE Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structures Using a Tresca-Type Yield Surface

INTRODUCTION TO THE EXPLICIT FINITE ELEMENT METHOD FOR NONLINEAR TRANSIENT DYNAMICS

Level 7 Postgraduate Diploma in Engineering Computational mechanics using finite element method

EDEM DISCRETIZATION (Phase II) Normal Direction Structure Idealization Tangential Direction Pore spring Contact spring SPRING TYPES Inner edge Inner d

3D Elasticity Theory

University of Sheffield The development of finite elements for 3D structural analysis in fire

Verification Examples

Strain Transformation equations

Nonlinear bending analysis of laminated composite stiffened plates

14. LS-DYNA Forum 2016

HIGHER-ORDER THEORIES

Bending of Simply Supported Isotropic and Composite Laminate Plates

Structural Dynamics Lecture Eleven: Dynamic Response of MDOF Systems: (Chapter 11) By: H. Ahmadian

BHAR AT HID AS AN ENGIN E ERI N G C O L L E G E NATTR A MPA LL I

MITOCW MITRES2_002S10nonlinear_lec15_300k-mp4

ELASTICITY AND FRACTURE MECHANICS. Vijay G. Ukadgaonker

CHAPTER THREE SYMMETRIC BENDING OF CIRCLE PLATES

FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF TAPERED COMPOSITE PLATE GIRDER WITH A NON-LINEAR VARYING WEB DEPTH

Finite element-based elasto-plastic optimum reinforcement dimensioning of spatial concrete panel structures

COUPLED FINITE-INFINITE ELEMENTS MODELING OF BUILDING FRAME-SOIL INTERACTION SYSTEM

Non-linear and time-dependent material models in Mentat & MARC. Tutorial with Background and Exercises

HIGHER-ORDER THEORIES

Bilinear Quadrilateral (Q4): CQUAD4 in GENESIS

A Constitutive Framework for the Numerical Analysis of Organic Soils and Directionally Dependent Materials

The following syntax is used to describe a typical irreducible continuum element:

Static & Dynamic. Analysis of Structures. Edward L.Wilson. University of California, Berkeley. Fourth Edition. Professor Emeritus of Civil Engineering

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS. EQUATIONS AND THEOREMS

CRITERIA FOR SELECTION OF FEM MODELS.

UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING

THE BEHAVIOUR OF REINFORCED CONCRETE AS DEPICTED IN FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS.

The Finite Element Method for Mechonics of Solids with ANSYS Applicotions

Analysis of laminated composite skew shells using higher order shear deformation theory

Aircraft Structures Kirchhoff-Love Plates

PLAT DAN CANGKANG (TKS 4219)

Meshfree Inelastic Frame Analysis

Aim of the study Experimental determination of mechanical parameters Local buckling (wrinkling) Failure maps Optimization of sandwich panels

AERSYS KNOWLEDGE UNIT

Contents as of 12/8/2017. Preface. 1. Overview...1

LARSA 2000 Reference. for. LARSA 2000 Finite Element Analysis and Design Software

ENGN 2340 Final Project Report. Optimization of Mechanical Isotropy of Soft Network Material

Plate Forces and Moments Blog Post pdf

ELASTOPLASTICITY THEORY by V. A. Lubarda

CIVL4332 L1 Introduction to Finite Element Method

Finite Elements for Large Strains - A double mixed (M 2 ) Formulation

Settlement and Bearing Capacity of a Strip Footing. Nonlinear Analyses

Lusas Warning And Error Messages

Plane and axisymmetric models in Mentat & MARC. Tutorial with some Background

ME FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS FORMULAS

ALGORITHM FOR NON-PROPORTIONAL LOADING IN SEQUENTIALLY LINEAR ANALYSIS

202 Index. failure, 26 field equation, 122 force, 1

Constitutive models: Incremental plasticity Drücker s postulate

COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. Index

SEMM Mechanics PhD Preliminary Exam Spring Consider a two-dimensional rigid motion, whose displacement field is given by

Non-Linear Finite Element Methods in Solid Mechanics Attilio Frangi, Politecnico di Milano, February 17, 2017, Lesson 5

Shear stresses around circular cylindrical openings

LINEAR AND NONLINEAR SHELL THEORY. Contents

Seismic Response Analysis of Structure Supported by Piles Subjected to Very Large Earthquake Based on 3D-FEM

Bifurcation Analysis in Geomechanics

Numerical Modeling of Interface Between Soil and Pile to Account for Loss of Contact during Seismic Excitation

Module I: Two-dimensional linear elasticity. application notes and tutorial. Problems

Finite Element Method-Part II Isoparametric FE Formulation and some numerical examples Lecture 29 Smart and Micro Systems

6. NON-LINEAR PSEUDO-STATIC ANALYSIS OF ADOBE WALLS

3. Overview of MSC/NASTRAN

Nonlinear analysis in ADINA Structures

MODELING OF CONCRETE MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES. Kaspar Willam

Lecture 15 Strain and stress in beams

JEPPIAAR ENGINEERING COLLEGE

Optimum Height of Plate Stiffener under Pressure Effect

NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF A PILE SUBJECTED TO LATERAL LOADS

General Guidelines for Crash Analysis in LS-DYNA. Suri Bala Jim Day. Copyright Livermore Software Technology Corporation

Anisotropic modeling of short fibers reinforced thermoplastics materials with LS-DYNA

NONLINEAR STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS USING FE METHODS

PLAXIS. Scientific Manual

International Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology E-ISSN

ULTIMATE STRENGTH OF SQUARE PLATE WITH RECTANGULAR OPENING UNDER AXIAL COMPRESSION

7. Hierarchical modeling examples

FLEXIBILITY METHOD FOR INDETERMINATE FRAMES

Dynamic Analysis of a Reinforced Concrete Structure Using Plasticity and Interface Damage Models

STRAIN ASSESSMENT USFOS

Chapter 6 2D Elements Plate Elements

Chapter 3. Load and Stress Analysis

Finite Element Analysis Prof. Dr. B. N. Rao Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras. Module - 01 Lecture - 13

ENGN 2290: Plasticity Computational plasticity in Abaqus

COMPUTATIONAL ELASTICITY

GEOMETRIC NONLINEAR ANALYSIS

Table of Contents. Preface...xvii. Part 1. Level

Practice Final Examination. Please initial the statement below to show that you have read it

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PURE AND APPLIED RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY

Finite Element Modeling and Analysis. CE 595: Course Part 2 Amit H. Varma

Transcription:

Semiloof Curved Thin Shell Elements General Element Name Y,v,θy X,u,θx Z,w,θz Element Group Element Subgroup Element Description Number Of Nodes Freedoms Node Coordinates TSL 1 2 Semiloof 3 QSL8 7 8 1 2 3 A family of shell elements for the analysis of arbitrarily curved shell geometries, including multiple branched junctions. The elements can accommodate generally curved geometry with varying thickness and anisotropic and composite material properties. The element formulation takes account of both membrane and flexural deformations. As required by thin shell theory, transverse shearing deformations are excluded. or 8 numbered anticlockwise. U, V, W: at corner nodes. U, V, W, θ 1, θ 2 : (loof rotations) at mid-side nodes (see Notes). X, Y, Z: at each node. Geometric Properties t 1... t n Thickness at each node. Also see Composite Geometry data chapter. Material Properties Linear Isotropic: MATERIAL PROPERTIES (Elastic: Isotropic) Orthotropic: MATERIAL PROPERTIES ORTHOTROPIC (Elastic: Orthotropic Plane Stress) MATERIAL PROPERTIES ORTHOTROPIC SOLID (Elastic: Orthotropic Solid) Anisotropic: MATERIAL PROPERTIES ANISOTROPIC 3 (Elastic: Anisotropic Thin Plate) Rigidities. RIGIDITIES (Rigidities: Shell) Matrix 21

Semiloof Curved Thin Shell Elements Joint Concrete Biaxial: MATERIAL PROPERTIES NONLINEAR 2 (Concrete: Biaxial) Elasto-Plastic Stress resultant: MATERIAL PROPERTIES NONLINEAR 29 (Elastic: Isotropic, Plastic: Resultant) (ifcode not required) Tresca: MATERIAL PROPERTIES NONLINEAR 1 (Elastic: Isotropic, Plastic: Tresca, Hardening: Isotropic Hardening Gradient, Isotropic Plastic Strain or Isotropic Total Strain) Mohr- Coulomb: Drucker- Prager: Volumetric Crushing: Rubber Composite Composite shell: Field Stress Potential Creep Damage Viscosity MATERIAL PROPERTIES NONLINEAR 3 (Elastic: Isotropic, Plastic: Mohr-Coulomb, Hardening: Granular) MATERIAL PROPERTIES NONLINEAR (Elastic: Isotropic, Plastic: Drucker-Prager, Hardening: Granular) COMPOSITE PROPERTIES STRESS POTENTIAL VON_MISES, HILL, HOFFMAN CREEP PROPERTIES (Creep) DAMAGE PROPERTIES SIMO, OLIVER (Damage) Loading Prescribed PDSP, TPDSP Value Concentrated CL Loads Element Loads Distributed UDL Loads FLD Body Forces CBF Prescribed variable. U, V, W: at corner nodes. U, V, W, θ 1, θ 2 : at mid-side nodes. Concentrated loads. Px, Py, Pz: at corner nodes. Px, Py, Pz, M 1, M 2 : at mid-side nodes. Uniformly distributed loads. Wx, Wy, Wz: midsurface local pressures for element. Constant body forces for element. Xcbf, Ycbf, Zcbf, Ωx, Ωy, Ωz, αx, αy, αz 21

BFP, BFPE Body force potentials at nodes/for element. ϕ 1, ϕ 2, ϕ 3, 0, Xcbf, Ycbf, Zcbf, where ϕ 1, ϕ 2, ϕ 3 are the face loads in the local coordinate system. Velocities VELO Velocities. Vx, Vy, Vz: at nodes. Accelerations ACCE Initial SSI, SSIE Stress/Strains Residual Stresses SSIG SSR, SSRE SSRG Accelerations. Ax, Ay, Az: at nodes. Initial stresses/strains at Gauss points. (1) Resultants (for model 29 and RIGIDITIES) Nx, Ny, Nxy, Mx, My, Mxy, εx, εy, γxy, ψx, ψy, ψxy: forces, moments/unit width and membrane/flexural strains in local directions. (2) Components (in all cases except for nonlinear model 29 and RIGIDITIES). 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, (σx, σy, σxy, εx, εy, γxy) Bracketed terms repeated for each layer. Residual stresses at Gauss points. (1) Resultants (for model 29) Nx, Ny, Nxy, Mx, My, Mxy: forces, moments/unit width in local directions. (2) Components (for all nonlinear material models except model 29). 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, (σx, σy, σxy) Bracketed terms repeated for each layer. Temperatures TEMP, TMPE Temperatures at nodes/for element. T, 0, 0, dt/dz, To, 0, 0, dto/dz Field Loads Temp Dependent Loads Output LUSAS Solver Stress resultant: Nx, Ny, Nxy, Mx, My, Mxy: forces, moments/unit width in local directions. Stress (default): σx, σy, σxy, σmax, σmin, β, σe: in local directions (see Notes). Strain: εx, εy, γxy, ψx, ψy, ψxy: membrane, flexural strains in local directions. 21

Semiloof Curved Thin Shell Elements LUSAS Modeller See Results Tables (Appendix K). Local Axes Local y axis The local element y-axis at a point coincides with a curvilinear line ξ = constant in the natural coordinate system which lies in the shell mid-surface. Local x axis The local x-axis at a point is perpendicular to the local y-axis in the positive η direction and is tangential to the shell mid-surface. Local z axis The local z-axis forms a right-hand set with the x and y axes and the direction is given by the ordering of the element nodes according to a right-hand screw rule. The local z-axis +ve direction defines the element top surface. TSL z x y 3 2 1 QSL8 η y z x ξ 3 7 2 8 1 217

Sign Convention Thin shell element (see Notes). Formulation Geometric Nonlinearity Total Lagrangian For large displacements, rotations up to 1 radian and small strains. Updated Lagrangian For large displacements, rotation increments up to 1 radian and small strains. Eulerian Co-rotational Integration Schemes Stiffness Default. 3-point (TSL), -point (QSL8). Fine (see Options). 3x3 (QSL8) Coarse (see Options). 2x2 (QSL8) Mass Default. 3-point (TSL), -point (QSL8). Fine (see Options). 3x3 (QSL8) Mass Modelling Consistent mass (default). Lumped mass. Options 18 Invokes fine integration rule. 19 Invokes coarse integration rule. 32 Suppresses stress output but not resultants. 3 Outputs element stress resultants. Updated Lagrangian geometric nonlinearity. Outputs strains as well as stresses. 9 Outputs local direction cosines at nodes and Gauss points. 87 Total Lagrangian geometric nonlinearity. 102 Switch off load correction stiffness due to centripetal acceleration. 10 Lumped mass matrix. 138 Output yield flags only. 139 Output yielded Gauss points only. 19 Suppress extrapolation of stresses to nodes. 170 Suppress transfer of shape function arrays to disk. 218

Semiloof Curved Thin Shell Elements Notes on Use 1. The element formulations are based on an isoparametric approach with constraints to invoke the Kirchhoff hypothesis for thin shells. 2. The variation of stresses within the elements may be regarded as linear. 3. The loof rotations refer to rotations about the element edge at the loof points. The positive direction of a loof rotation is defined by a right-hand screw rule applied to a vector running in the direction of the lower to higher numbered corner nodes. It should be noted that this direction is enforced on a global level which means that the loof rotations along the adjoining edge of several elements will be consistent in terms of direction and ordering. The ordering is such that loof point 1 is located between the lower numbered node and the appropriate mid-side node. Similarly loof point 2 lies between the mid-side node and the higher numbered node along an element edge. The loof rotations are actually specified at the element mid-side nodes.. The elements pass the patch test for convergence for mixed triangular and quadrilateral element geometry.. Stress output to the LUSAS output file is on lines: Stresses due to membrane action. Top surface stresses due to bending action. Top surface stresses due to membrane and bending action. Bottom surface stresses due to membrane and bending action.. Stresses will not be output when using RIGIDITIES or material model 29. Averaged stresses will not be processed when using RIGIDITIES. 7. The through-thickness integration is performed explicitly for linear analyses and a -point Newton-Cotes rule is utilised for materially nonlinear analyses with continuum material models. The through-thickness integration rules are as follows: Linear models: 3-layers. Nonlinear models: -layers. Composite model: Variable. Restrictions Ensure mid-side node centrality Avoid excessive element curvature Avoid excessive aspect ratio Recommendation on Usage These elements may be utilised for analysing flat and curved 3D shell structures where the transverse shear effects do not influence the solution. The configuration of 219

the nodal freedoms provides an element suitable for modelling intersecting shells, e.g. tubular joints and also for use with solid elements (HX20). The elements may be combined with the Semiloof beam (BSL3,BSL,BXL) for analysing ribbed plates and shells. The quadrature points of the 3-point rule are non-standard. The coarse 2*2 quadrature rule provides the most effective element if the mesh is highly constrained. However, the element possesses two mechanisms, the usual in-plane hourglass mechanism encountered when reduced integration is utilised with 8-noded elements and an out of plane mechanism. The in-plane mechanism is rarely activated but the out-of-plane mechanism may be more troublesome, particularly where elements are regular and have one zero principal curvature, e.g. a cylinder subject to internal pressure. Provided the mechanisms are not activated the element with 2*2 provides the best results. The -point quadrature rule provides an element with a performance below that of the element with 2*2 quadrature, but considerably better than the element with 3*3 quadrature. However, the element possesses a 'near' mechanism which may be activated for lightly constrained meshes, particularly if out of plane loads are present. The middle integration point of the point rule is only implemented as a method of reducing the excitation of spurious modes (or mechanisms) which are present with the 2*2 integration rule. The th integration point is actually weighted with an arbitrarily small value which has the effect of stabilising the results. For these reasons, values from the middle integration point are not taken into account for the nodal extrapolation. The 3*3 quadrature rule provides an element that has no mechanisms but tends to provide over-stiff solutions. Therefore, a finer discretisation is required than if the -point quadrature rule is used. 220