Isometries, Local Isometries, Riemannian Coverings and Submersions, Killing Vector Fields

Similar documents
Isometries, Local Isometries, Riemannian Coverings and Submersions, Killing Vector Fields

Chapter 12. Connections on Manifolds

CHAPTER 1 PRELIMINARIES

1. Geometry of the unit tangent bundle

HARMONIC READING COURSE

Reduction of Homogeneous Riemannian structures

L 2 Geometry of the Symplectomorphism Group

ARITHMETICITY OF TOTALLY GEODESIC LIE FOLIATIONS WITH LOCALLY SYMMETRIC LEAVES

zi z i, zi+1 z i,, zn z i. z j, zj+1 z j,, zj 1 z j,, zn

5.2 The Levi-Civita Connection on Surfaces. 1 Parallel transport of vector fields on a surface M

Metrics, Connections, and Curvature on Lie Groups

Exercises in Geometry II University of Bonn, Summer semester 2015 Professor: Prof. Christian Blohmann Assistant: Saskia Voss Sheet 1

CALCULUS ON MANIFOLDS. 1. Riemannian manifolds Recall that for any smooth manifold M, dim M = n, the union T M =

LECTURE 10: THE PARALLEL TRANSPORT

LECTURE 25-26: CARTAN S THEOREM OF MAXIMAL TORI. 1. Maximal Tori

Transport Continuity Property

Curvature in Riemannian Manifolds

A brief introduction to Semi-Riemannian geometry and general relativity. Hans Ringström

Hadamard s Theorem. Rich Schwartz. September 10, The purpose of these notes is to prove the following theorem.

Invariant Nonholonomic Riemannian Structures on Three-Dimensional Lie Groups

Notes on the Riemannian Geometry of Lie Groups

Holomorphic line bundles

Differential Geometry MTG 6257 Spring 2018 Problem Set 4 Due-date: Wednesday, 4/25/18

Lecture Notes a posteriori for Math 201

EXAMPLES OF SELF-DUAL, EINSTEIN METRICS OF (2, 2)-SIGNATURE

Divergence Theorems in Path Space. Denis Bell University of North Florida

LECTURE 8: THE SECTIONAL AND RICCI CURVATURES

Let F be a foliation of dimension p and codimension q on a smooth manifold of dimension n.

Curvature homogeneity of type (1, 3) in pseudo-riemannian manifolds

The Atiyah bundle and connections on a principal bundle

Invariant Nonholonomic Riemannian Structures on Three-Dimensional Lie Groups

Notes on quotients and group actions

The local geometry of compact homogeneous Lorentz spaces

LECTURE 14: LIE GROUP ACTIONS

LECTURE 16: LIE GROUPS AND THEIR LIE ALGEBRAS. 1. Lie groups

Homogeneous para-kähler Einstein manifolds. Dmitri V. Alekseevsky

A CONSTRUCTION OF TRANSVERSE SUBMANIFOLDS

Complex line bundles. Chapter Connections of line bundle. Consider a complex line bundle L M. For any integer k N, let

As always, the story begins with Riemann surfaces or just (real) surfaces. (As we have already noted, these are nearly the same thing).

arxiv: v1 [math.dg] 2 Oct 2015

Hamiltonian Systems of Negative Curvature are Hyperbolic

Chapter 3. Riemannian Manifolds - I. The subject of this thesis is to extend the combinatorial curve reconstruction approach to curves

EXERCISES IN POISSON GEOMETRY

Representation theory and the X-ray transform

Choice of Riemannian Metrics for Rigid Body Kinematics

B 1 = {B(x, r) x = (x 1, x 2 ) H, 0 < r < x 2 }. (a) Show that B = B 1 B 2 is a basis for a topology on X.

SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY: LECTURE 5

Left-invariant Einstein metrics

Symmetric Spaces Toolkit

WARPED PRODUCTS PETER PETERSEN

class # MATH 7711, AUTUMN 2017 M-W-F 3:00 p.m., BE 128 A DAY-BY-DAY LIST OF TOPICS

Torus actions and Ricci-flat metrics

Jeong-Sik Kim, Yeong-Moo Song and Mukut Mani Tripathi

arxiv: v3 [math.dg] 13 Mar 2011

1 v >, which will be G-invariant by construction.

Smooth Dynamics 2. Problem Set Nr. 1. Instructor: Submitted by: Prof. Wilkinson Clark Butler. University of Chicago Winter 2013

BERGMAN KERNEL ON COMPACT KÄHLER MANIFOLDS

Hamiltonian flows, cotangent lifts, and momentum maps

Hyperkähler geometry lecture 3

Research Article New Examples of Einstein Metrics in Dimension Four

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY HW 12

Affine Connections: Part 2

MODEL SPACES IN SUB-RIEMANNIAN GEOMETRY

LECTURE 26: THE CHERN-WEIL THEORY

ESSENTIAL KILLING FIELDS OF PARABOLIC GEOMETRIES: PROJECTIVE AND CONFORMAL STRUCTURES. 1. Introduction

15B. Isometries and Functionals 1

Warped Products. by Peter Petersen. We shall de ne as few concepts as possible. A tangent vector always has the local coordinate expansion

Spacelike surfaces with positive definite second fundamental form in 3-dimensional Lorentzian manifolds

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY CLASS NOTES INSTRUCTOR: F. MARQUES. September 25, 2015

Symmetric Spaces. Andrew Fiori. Sept McGill University

Fundamentals of Differential Geometry

The existence of light-like homogeneous geodesics in homogeneous Lorentzian manifolds. Sao Paulo, 2013

LECTURE 3: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (C) AND sl 2 (C)

STRUCTURE OF GEODESICS IN A 13-DIMENSIONAL GROUP OF HEISENBERG TYPE

Adapted complex structures and Riemannian homogeneous spaces

Holonomy groups. Thomas Leistner. Mathematics Colloquium School of Mathematics and Physics The University of Queensland. October 31, 2011 May 28, 2012

An Introduction to Differential Geometry through Computation

INSTANTON MODULI AND COMPACTIFICATION MATTHEW MAHOWALD

On isometries of Finsler manifolds

Luis Guijarro, Lorenzo Sadun, and Gerard Walschap

Comparison for infinitesimal automorphisms. of parabolic geometries

GENERALIZED NULL SCROLLS IN THE n-dimensional LORENTZIAN SPACE. 1. Introduction

Some aspects of the Geodesic flow

Infinitesimal Einstein Deformations. Kähler Manifolds

Lecture 4 Super Lie groups

Geodesic Equivalence in sub-riemannian Geometry

OBSTRUCTION TO POSITIVE CURVATURE ON HOMOGENEOUS BUNDLES

KILLING TENSORS AND EINSTEIN WEYL GEOMETRY

INTEGRATION BY PARTS AND QUASI-INVARIANCE FOR THE HORIZONTAL WIENER MEASURE ON A FOLIATED COMPACT MANIFOLD

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY, LECTURE 16-17, JULY 14-17

Many of the exercises are taken from the books referred at the end of the document.

On homogeneous Randers spaces with Douglas or naturally reductive metrics

An Introduction to Riemann-Finsler Geometry

274 Curves on Surfaces, Lecture 4

DIFFERENTIAL FORMS AND COHOMOLOGY

MILNOR SEMINAR: DIFFERENTIAL FORMS AND CHERN CLASSES

Introduction to Index Theory. Elmar Schrohe Institut für Analysis

September 27, :51 WSPC/INSTRUCTION FILE biswas-loftin. Hermitian Einstein connections on principal bundles over flat affine manifolds

fy (X(g)) Y (f)x(g) gy (X(f)) Y (g)x(f)) = fx(y (g)) + gx(y (f)) fy (X(g)) gy (X(f))

Fisica Matematica. Stefano Ansoldi. Dipartimento di Matematica e Informatica. Università degli Studi di Udine. Corso di Laurea in Matematica

Transcription:

Chapter 16 Isometries, Local Isometries, Riemannian Coverings and Submersions, Killing Vector Fields 16.1 Isometries and Local Isometries Recall that a local isometry between two Riemannian manifolds M and N is a smooth map ': M! N so that h(d') p (u), (d' p )(v)i '(p) = hu, vi p, for all p 2 M and all u, v 2 T p M. An isometry is a local isometry and a di eomorphism. By the inverse function theorem, if ': M! N is a local isometry, then for every p 2 M,thereissomeopensubset U M with p 2 U so that ' U is an isometry between U and '(U). 743

744 CHAPTER 16. ISOMETRIES, SUBMERSIONS, KILLING VECTOR FIELDS Also recall that if ': M! N is a di eomorphism, then for any vector field X on M, thevectorfield' X on N (called the push-forward of X) isgivenby (' X) q = d' ' 1 (q)x(' 1 (q)), for all q 2 N, or equivalently, by (' X) '(p) = d' p X(p), for all p 2 M. For any smooth function h: N! R, foranyq 2 N, we have X (h) q = X(h ') ' 1 (q), or X (h) '(p) = X(h ') p.

16.1. ISOMETRIES AND LOCAL ISOMETRIES 745 It is natural to expect that isometries preserve all natural Riemannian concepts and this is indeed the case. We begin with the Levi-Civita connection. Proposition 16.1. If ': M! N is an isometry, then ' (r X Y )=r ' X(' Y ), for all X, Y 2 X(M), where r X Y is the Levi-Civita connection induced by the metric on M and similarly on N. As a corollary of Proposition 16.1, the curvature induced by the connection is preserved; that is ' R(X, Y )Z = R(' X, ' Y )' Z, as well as the parallel transport, the covariant derivative of a vector field along a curve, the exponential map, sectional curvature, Ricci curvature and geodesics.

746 CHAPTER 16. ISOMETRIES, SUBMERSIONS, KILLING VECTOR FIELDS Actually, all concepts that are local in nature are preserved by local di eomorphisms! So, except for the Levi- Civita connection and the Riemann tensor on vectors, all the above concepts are preserved under local di eomorphisms. Proposition 16.2. If ': M! N is a local isometry, then the following concepts are preserved: (1) The covariant derivative of vector fields along a curve ; that is DX d' (t) = D' X, dt dt for any vector field X along, with (' X)(t) = d' (t) Y (t), for all t. (2) Parallel translation along a curve. If P denotes parallel transport along the curve and if P ' denotes parallel transport along the curve ', then d' (1) P = P ' d' (0).

16.1. ISOMETRIES AND LOCAL ISOMETRIES 747 (3) Geodesics. If is a geodesic in M, then ' is a geodesic in N. Thus, if v is the unique geodesic with (0) = p and v(0) 0 = v, then ' v = d'p v, wherever both sides are defined. Note that the domain of d' p v may be strictly larger than the domain of v. For example, consider the inclusion of an open disc into R 2. (4) Exponential maps. We have ' exp p =exp '(p) d' p, wherever both sides are defined. (5) Riemannian curvature tensor. We have d' p R(x, y)z = R(d' p x, d' p y)d' p z, for all x, y, z 2 T p M.

748 CHAPTER 16. ISOMETRIES, SUBMERSIONS, KILLING VECTOR FIELDS (6) Sectional, Ricci, and Scalar curvature. We have K(d' p x, d' p y)=k(x, y) p, for all linearly independent vectors x, y 2 T p M; for all x, y 2 T p M; Ric(d' p x, d' p y)=ric(x, y) p S M = S N where S M is the scalar curvature on M and S N is the scalar curvature on N. '. Ausefulpropertyoflocaldi eomorphismsisstatedbelow. For a proof, see O Neill [44] (Chapter 3, Proposition 62): Proposition 16.3. Let ', : M! N be two local isometries. If M is connected and if '(p) = (p) and d' p = d p for some p 2 M, then ' =.

16.2. RIEMANNIAN COVERING MAPS 749 16.2 Riemannian Covering Maps The notion of covering map discussed in Section 7.3 (see Definition 7.8) can be extended to Riemannian manifolds. Definition 16.1. If M and N are two Riemannian manifold, then a map : M! N is a Riemannian covering i the following conditions hold: (1) The map is a smooth covering map. (2) The map is a local isometry. Recall from Section 7.3 that a covering map is a local di eomorphism. AwaytoobtainametriconamanifoldM is to pull-back the metric g on a manifold N along a local di eomorphism ': M! N (see Section 11.2).

750 CHAPTER 16. ISOMETRIES, SUBMERSIONS, KILLING VECTOR FIELDS If ' is a covering map, then it becomes a Riemannian covering map. Proposition 16.4. Let : M! N be a smooth covering map. For any Riemannian metric g on N, there is a unique metric g on M, so that is a Riemannian covering. In general, if : M! N is a smooth covering map, a metric on M does not induce a metric on N such that is a Riemannian covering. However, if N is obtained from M as a quotient by some suitable group action (by a group G) onm, thenthe projection : M! M/G is a Riemannian covering.

16.2. RIEMANNIAN COVERING MAPS 751 Because a Riemannian covering map is a local isometry, we have the following useful result. Proposition 16.5. Let : M! N be a Riemannian covering. Then, the geodesics of (M,g) are the projections of the geodesics of (N,h) (curves of the form, where is a geodesic in N), and the geodesics of (N,h) are the liftings of the geodesics of (M,h) (curves in N such that is a geodesic of (M,h)). As a corollary of Proposition 16.4 and Theorem 7.12, every connected Riemannian manifold M has a simply connected covering map : f M! M, where is a Riemannian covering. Furthermore, if : M! N is a Riemannian covering and ': P! N is a local isometry, it is easy to see that its lift e': P! M is also a local isometry.

752 CHAPTER 16. ISOMETRIES, SUBMERSIONS, KILLING VECTOR FIELDS In particular, the deck-transformations of a Riemannian covering are isometries. In general, a local isometry is not a Riemannian covering. However, this is the case when the source space is complete. Proposition 16.6. Let : M! N be a local isometry with N connected. If M is a complete manifold, then is a Riemannian covering map.

16.3. RIEMANNIAN SUBMERSIONS 753 16.3 Riemannian Submersions Let : M! B be a surjective submersion between two Riemannian manifolds (M,g) and(b,h). For every b 2 B, thefibre 1 (b) isariemanniansubmanifold of M, andforeveryp 2 1 (b), the tangent space T p 1 (b) to 1 (b) atp is Ker d p. The tangent space T p M to M at p splits into the two components T p M =Kerd p (Ker d p )?, where V p = Kerd p is the vertical subspace of T p M and H p =(Kerd p )? (the orthogonal complement of V p with respect to the metric g p on T p M)isthehorizontal subspace of T p M.

754 CHAPTER 16. ISOMETRIES, SUBMERSIONS, KILLING VECTOR FIELDS Any tangent vector u 2 T p M can be written uniquely as with u H 2H p and u V 2V p. u = u H + u V, Because is a submersion, d p gives a linear isomorphism between H p and T b B. If d p is an isometry, then most of the di erential geometry of B can be studied by lifting from B to M. Definition 16.2. Amap : M! B between two Riemannian manifolds (M,g) and(b,h) isariemannian submersion if the following properties hold: (1) The map is surjective and a smooth submersion. (2) For every b 2 B and every p 2 1 (b), the map d p is an isometry between the horizontal subspace H p of T p M and T b B.

16.3. RIEMANNIAN SUBMERSIONS 755 We will see later that Riemannian submersions arise when B is a reductive homogeneous space, or when B is obtained from a free and proper action of a Lie group acting by isometries on B. Every vector field X on B has a unique horizontal lift X on M, definedsuchthatforeveryp 2 1 (b), X(p) =(d p ) 1 X(b). Since d p is an isomorphism between H p and T p B,the above condition can be written d X = X, which means that X and X are -related (see Definition 6.5). The following proposition is proved in O Neill [44] (Chapter 7, Lemma 45) and Gallot, Hulin, Lafontaine [23] (Chapter 2, Proposition 2.109).

756 CHAPTER 16. ISOMETRIES, SUBMERSIONS, KILLING VECTOR FIELDS Proposition 16.7. Let : M! B be a Riemannian submersion between two Riemannian manifolds (M,g) and (B,h). (1) For any two vector fields X, Y 2 X(B), we have (a) hx,y i = hx, Y i. (b) [X,Y ] H = [X, Y ]. (c) (r X Y ) H = r X Y, where r is the Levi Civita connection on M. (2) If is a geodesic in M such that 0 (0) is a horizontal vector, then is horizontal geodesic in M (which means that 0 (t) is a horizontal vector for all t), and c = is a geodesic in B of the same length than. (3) For every p 2 M, if c is a geodesic in B such that c(0) = (p), then for some small enough, there is a unique horizonal lift of the restriction of c to [, ], and is a geodesic of M. (4) If M is complete, then B is also complete.

16.3. RIEMANNIAN SUBMERSIONS 757 An example of a Riemannian submersion is : S 2n+1! CP n,wheres 2n+1 has the canonical metric and CP n has the Fubini Study metric. Remark: It shown in Petersen [45] (Chapter 3, Section 5), that the connection r X Y on M is given by r X Y = r X Y + 1 2 [X,Y ] V.

758 CHAPTER 16. ISOMETRIES, SUBMERSIONS, KILLING VECTOR FIELDS 16.4 Isometries and Killing Vector Fields ~ Recall from Section?? that if X is a vector field on a manifold M,thenforany(0,q)-tensor S 2 (M,(T ) q (M)), the Lie derivative L X S of S with respect to X is defined by (L X S) p = d dt ( t S) p, 2 M, t=0 where t is the local one-parameter group associated with X, andthatbyproposition??, (L X S)(X 1,...,X q )=X(S(X 1,...,X q )) qx S(X 1,...,[X, X i ],...,X q ), i=1 for all X 1,...,X q 2 X(M).

16.4. ISOMETRIES AND KILLING VECTOR FIELDS ~ 759 In particular, if S = g (the metric tensor), we get L X g(y,z) =X(hY,Zi) h[x, Y ],Zi hy,[x, Z]i, where we write hx, Y i and g(x, Y )interchangeably. If t is an isometry (on its domain), then t (g) =g, so L X g =0. In fact, we have the following result proved in O Neill [44] (Chapter 9, Proposition 23). Proposition 16.8. For any vector field X on a Riemannian manifold (M,g), the di eomorphisms t induced by the flow of X are isometries (on their domain) i L X g =0.

760 CHAPTER 16. ISOMETRIES, SUBMERSIONS, KILLING VECTOR FIELDS Informally, Proposition 16.8 says that L X g measures how much the vector field X changes the metric g. Definition 16.3. Given a Riemannian manifold (M,g), avectorfieldx is a Killing vector field i the Lie derivative of the metric vanishes; that is, L X g =0. Recall from Section?? (see Proposition??) thatthecovariant derivative r X g of the Riemannian metric g on a manifold M is given by r X (g)(y,z) =X(hY,Zi) hr X Y,Zi hy,r X Zi, for all X, Y, Z 2 X(M), and that the connection r on M is compatible with g i r X (g) =0forallX.

16.4. ISOMETRIES AND KILLING VECTOR FIELDS ~ 761 Also, the covariant derivative rx of a vector field X is the (1, 1)-tensor defined so that (rx)(y )=r Y X. The above facts imply the following Proposition. Proposition 16.9. Let (M,g) be a Riemannian manifold and let r be the Levi Civita connection on M induced by g. For every vector field X on M, the following conditions are equivalent: (1) X is a Killing vector field; that is, L X g =0. (2) X(hY,Zi) =h[x, Y ],Zi + hy,[x, Z]i for all Y,Z 2 X(M). (3) hr Y X, Zi + hr Z X, Y i =0for all Y,Z 2 X(M); that is, rx is skew-adjoint relative to g. Condition (3) shows that any parallel vector field is a Killing vector field.

762 CHAPTER 16. ISOMETRIES, SUBMERSIONS, KILLING VECTOR FIELDS Remark: It can be shown that if is any geodesic in M, thentherestrictionx of X to is a Jacobi field (see Section 14.5), and that hx, 0 i is constant along (see O Neill [44], Chapter 9, Lemma 26). Since the Lie derivative L X is R-linear in X and since [L X,L Y ]=L [X,Y ], the Killing vector fields on M form a Lie subalgebra Ki(M) oftheliealgebrax(m) ofvectorfieldsonm. However, unlike X(M), the Lie algebra Ki(M) isfinitedimensional. In fact, the Lie subalgebra cki(m) ofcompletekilling vector fields is anti-isomorphic to the Lie algebra i(m) of the Lie group Isom(M) ofisometriesofm (see Section 11.2 for the definition of Isom(M)).

16.4. ISOMETRIES AND KILLING VECTOR FIELDS ~ 763 The following result is proved in O Neill [44] (Chapter 9, Lemma 28) and Sakai [49] (Chapter III, Lemma 6.4 and Proposition 6.5). Proposition 16.10. Let (M,g) be a connected Riemannian manifold of dimension n (equip-ped with the Levi Civita connection on M induced by g). The Lie algebra Ki(M) of Killing vector fields on M has dimension at most n(n +1)/2. We also have the following result proved in O Neill [44] (Chapter 9, Proposition 30) and Sakai [49] (Chapter III, Corollary 6.3). Proposition 16.11. Let (M,g) be a Riemannian manifold of dimension n (equipped with the Levi Civita connection on M induced by g). If M is complete, then every Killing vector fields on M is complete.

764 CHAPTER 16. ISOMETRIES, SUBMERSIONS, KILLING VECTOR FIELDS The relationship between the Lie algebra i(m)andkilling vector fields is obtained as follows. For every element X in the Lie algebra i(m) of Isom(M) (viewed as a left-invariant vector field), define the vector field X + on M by X + (p) = d dt (' t(p)) t=0, p 2 M, where t 7! ' t =exp(tx) istheone-parametergroup associated with X. Because ' t is an isometry of M, thevectorfieldx + is a Killing vector field, and it is also easy to show that (' t ) is the one-parameter group of X +.

16.4. ISOMETRIES AND KILLING VECTOR FIELDS ~ 765 Since ' t is defined for all t, thevectorfieldx + is complete. The following result is shown in O Neill [44] (Chapter 9, Proposition 33). Theorem 16.12. Let (M,g) be a Riemannian manifold (equipped with the Levi Civita connection on M induced by g). The following properties hold: (1) The set cki(m) of complete Killing vector fields on M is a Lie subalgebra of the Lie algebra Ki(M) of Killing vector fields. (2) The map X 7! X + is a Lie anti-isomorphism between i(m) and cki(m), which means that [X +,Y + ]= [X, Y ] +, X,Y 2 i(m). For more on Killing vector fields, see Sakai [49] (Chapter III, Section 6). In particular, complete Riemannian manifolds for which i(m) hasthemaximumdimensionn(n +1)/2 arecharacterized.

766 CHAPTER 16. ISOMETRIES, SUBMERSIONS, KILLING VECTOR FIELDS