ME311 Machine Design

Similar documents
MAHALAKSHMI ENGINEERING COLLEGE

4.2 Design of Sections for Flexure

15. Stress-Strain behavior of soils

Mechanical Properties

That is, we start with a general matrix: And end with a simpler matrix:

4.4 Design of Sections for Flexure (Part III)

Module 7 Design of Springs. Version 2 ME, IIT Kharagpur

At the end of this lesson, the students should be able to understand:


Unfired pressure vessels- Part 3: Design

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS

Forces. Quantum ElectroDynamics. α = = We have now:

Differential Equations

Strength of Materials

COHORT MBA. Exponential function. MATH review (part2) by Lucian Mitroiu. The LOG and EXP functions. Properties: e e. lim.

Ch. 24 Molecular Reaction Dynamics 1. Collision Theory

VSMN30 FINITA ELEMENTMETODEN - DUGGA

Pressure. Minimum Hydrostatic Testing 1.5 x Maximum Allowable Working. Test Temperature Limits

Einstein Equations for Tetrad Fields

NONLINEAR ANALYSIS OF PLATE BENDING

Partial Derivatives: Suppose that z = f(x, y) is a function of two variables.

ph People Grade Level: basic Duration: minutes Setting: classroom or field site

CIE4145 : STRESS STRAIN RELATION LECTURE TOPICS

The van der Waals interaction 1 D. E. Soper 2 University of Oregon 20 April 2012

The pn junction: 2 Current vs Voltage (IV) characteristics

22/ Breakdown of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation. Selection rules for rotational-vibrational transitions. P, R branches.

Math 34A. Final Review

EECE 301 Signals & Systems Prof. Mark Fowler

Self-Adjointness and Its Relationship to Quantum Mechanics. Ronald I. Frank 2016

Classical Magnetic Dipole

A New Approach to the Fatigue Life Prediction for Notched Components Under Multiaxial Cyclic Loading. Zhi-qiang TAO and De-guang SHANG *

Probability and Stochastic Processes: A Friendly Introduction for Electrical and Computer Engineers Roy D. Yates and David J.

Lecture Triaxial Stress and Yield Criteria. When does yielding occurs in multi-axial stress states?

u x v x dx u x v x v x u x dx d u x v x u x v x dx u x v x dx Integration by Parts Formula

Estimation of apparent fraction defective: A mathematical approach

Integration by Parts

Failure from static loading

MCB137: Physical Biology of the Cell Spring 2017 Homework 6: Ligand binding and the MWC model of allostery (Due 3/23/17)

First derivative analysis

Pipe flow friction, small vs. big pipes

ME311 Machine Design

ANALYTICAL MODEL FOR CFRP SHEETS BONDED TO CONCRETE

ME 321 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machines S. Lambert Winter 2002

ME111 Instructor: Peter Pinsky Class #21 November 13, 2000

5.62 Physical Chemistry II Spring 2008

Differential Equations

Theoretical and Experimental studying on simply supported Steel shear wall

Pair (and Triplet) Production Effect:

Middle East Technical University Department of Mechanical Engineering ME 413 Introduction to Finite Element Analysis

EEO 401 Digital Signal Processing Prof. Mark Fowler

Chemical Physics II. More Stat. Thermo Kinetics Protein Folding...

Electrochemistry L E O

Where k is either given or determined from the data and c is an arbitrary constant.

orbiting electron turns out to be wrong even though it Unfortunately, the classical visualization of the

Higher order derivatives

6.1 Integration by Parts and Present Value. Copyright Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

5.80 Small-Molecule Spectroscopy and Dynamics

AS 5850 Finite Element Analysis

Lie Groups HW7. Wang Shuai. November 2015

Text: WMM, Chapter 5. Sections , ,

The Interlaminar Stress of Laminated Composite under Uniform Axial Deformation

Fourier Transforms and the Wave Equation. Key Mathematics: More Fourier transform theory, especially as applied to solving the wave equation.

Differentiation of Exponential Functions

Thomas Whitham Sixth Form

Search sequence databases 3 10/25/2016

Brief Introduction to Statistical Mechanics

Linear Non-Gaussian Structural Equation Models

Broadband All-Angle Negative Refraction by Phononic Crystals

Data Assimilation 1. Alan O Neill National Centre for Earth Observation UK

(Upside-Down o Direct Rotation) β - Numbers

Give the letter that represents an atom (6) (b) Atoms of A and D combine to form a compound containing covalent bonds.

Chapter 5. Introduction. Introduction. Introduction. Finite Element Modelling. Finite Element Modelling

Difference -Analytical Method of The One-Dimensional Convection-Diffusion Equation

Atomic Physics. Final Mon. May 12, 12:25-2:25, Ingraham B10 Get prepared for the Final!

MA1506 Tutorial 2 Solutions. Question 1. (1a) 1 ) y x. e x. 1 exp (in general, Integrating factor is. ye dx. So ) (1b) e e. e c.

Principles of Humidity Dalton s law

SECTION where P (cos θ, sin θ) and Q(cos θ, sin θ) are polynomials in cos θ and sin θ, provided Q is never equal to zero.

Title: Vibrational structure of electronic transition

NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF THERMAL WARPING AND BUCKLING IN ENAMELLED STEEL PARTS

Gradebook & Midterm & Office Hours

MSLC Math 151 WI09 Exam 2 Review Solutions

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS

High Energy Physics. Lecture 5 The Passage of Particles through Matter

Thomas Whitham Sixth Form

Coupled Pendulums. Two normal modes.

The Matrix Exponential

EXST Regression Techniques Page 1

MAE4700/5700 Finite Element Analysis for Mechanical and Aerospace Design

Use Hooke s Law (as it applies in the uniaxial direction),

TO PREVENT STATIC A NEW. regated. tle material. method. element. applied

Electrochemical Energy Systems Spring 2014 MIT, M. Z. Bazant. Midterm Exam

Note If the candidate believes that e x = 0 solves to x = 0 or gives an extra solution of x = 0, then withhold the final accuracy mark.

Addition of angular momentum

Statistical Thermodynamics: Sublimation of Solid Iodine

Static Failure (pg 206)

Voltage, Current, Power, Series Resistance, Parallel Resistance, and Diodes

The Matrix Exponential

FE modeling of inelastic behavior of reinforced high-strength concrete continuous beams

Exam 2 Thursday (7:30-9pm) It will cover material through HW 7, but no material that was on the 1 st exam.

EEO 401 Digital Signal Processing Prof. Mark Fowler

Transcription:

ME311 Machin Dsign Lctur 4: Strss Concntrations; Static Failur W Dornfld 8Sp017 Fairfild Univrsit School of Enginring Strss Concntration W saw that in a curvd bam, th strss was distortd from th uniform distribution of a straight bam, and highr at th insid radius. A similar distortion happns nar hols, notchs, and changs in sction: Th ffct varis with th loading tp: tnsion, bnding, or torsion. 1

Strss Concntration Strss Concntration Factors rlat th maimum strss to th avrag strss in th minimum cross sction of th part. d b 0.75.0 0.375 nom 300 (.0 0.75)0.5 300 0.315 960 psi ma Kc nom.5 960 160 psi Hamrock s plots tll ou th nominal strss. Hamrock Fig. 6.a Which has th biggr K c? r r 150 150 M M Us Fig.: H r h r K h c Us Fig.: H r h r K h c

Prdicting Failur W ar givn som matrial that is tnsil tstd and ilds at S ksi. It has a Mohr s circl that looks lik this: W want to us this matrial in an application whr it ss this loading: 40 80 50 60 0 It has a Mohr s circl that looks lik this: -40 80 Th Ma Principal strss is lss than ksi, but will it ild? Failur Thor Failur Thor addrsss how to translat a ral, multiaial stat of strss into somthing that can b compard with a simpl uniaial (tnsil) tst rsult. For ductil matrials, thr ar two prvailing thoris: 1. Ma Shar Strss Thor (MSST) or Trsca Thor. Distortion Enrg Thor (DET) or von Miss critrion. 3

Ma Shar Strss MSST sas "Yild occurs whnvr th maimum shar strss in an lmnt cds th ma shar at ild in a tnsil tst" In othr words, th Mohr's circl lis within th shar bounds (uppr and lowr) of th tnsil tst. 50 How did w do? Ma Shar Strss 60 50-40 80 Dosn t look good. MSST prdicts ilding whn 1-3 S. (~Eqn. 6.8) 1 is Ma principal and 3 is Min principal. In our cas, 1-3 [80 (-40)] 10 > S of. Anothr wa to sa is that ma S / 4

Ma Shar Strss Hr is a rprsntation of MSST in trms of limits to Ma and Min principal strsss: 1 1 & S t 1 1 1 1 S t 1 Insid th bo is saf. 1 This is th pur shar lin, whr 1 -. Distortion Enrg DET obsrvs that matrials can tak normous hdrostatic prssurs (.g., rocks dp in th arth that s prssurs wll abov thir comprssiv strngth) and not fractur suggsting that it must b distortion that causs failur. DET ssntiall computs th total strain nrg and subtracts th volum chang nrg to gt th distortion nrg. In trms of principal strsss: 1 ( 1 ) + ( 3) + ( 1 3) whr is th von Miss quivalnt strss. Not that for hdrostatic loading, 1 3, and 0! 5

Distortion Enrg In th mor common cas of biaial principal strsss ( 3 0), this rducs to: In our ampl, this is: + 1 1 80 (80)( 40) + ( 40) 6400 + 300 + 1600 11,00 105.8ksi This cds S ksi, so DET also prdicts ilding. Distortion Enrg - Simplifid If ou hav onl dirct biaial strss ( z 0), ou can calculat DET dirctl from,, and without gtting th principal strsss: + + 3 And, if ou hav onl bnding and torsion ( 0), this rducs to: + 3 (Hamrock buris this in E. 7.4 on pag 170.) 6

Th Failur Thoris, ovrlaid MSST is a littl mor consrvativ than DET. Brittl Thoris Brittl matrials can tak mor comprssion than tnsion, so hav diffrnt failur bounds. Ma Normal Strss Thor Intrnal Friction Thor & Modifid Mohr Thor Th Brittl thoris us Ultimat Strngths bcaus th fractur rathr than ild, and both Comprssiv and Tnsil strngths bcaus th ar diffrnt. 7

Rmmbr th Crank Arm? in lb Torqu B 300 lb Shar A 1800 in.lb Momnt C in lb Torqu z A At "A": Bnding M 1800 in.lb. Torsion T in.lb. Mc (1800)(0.375) 675 43,460 psi 4 I π (0.75) 64 0.01553 Tr ()(0.375) 450 z 14,487 psi 4 J π (0.75) 3 0.03106 4V (4)(300) BENDING 905 psi 3A 3π (0.75) 4 1.35 TOTAL z BENDING 13,58 psi Pur Shar 300 lb Shar B At B": Torsion T in.lb. Shar V 300 lb Not that at location C, th two shars would ADD to 15,39 psi. Strsss in a Crank Arm Th strsss at A occur at th sam point, so can us Mohr. For Xstrss 43.5, Ystrss 0.0, XYShar -14.5, Angl -16.85, Strss1 47.85, Strss 0.00, Strss3-4.39, SharMa 6.1 30 0 z A Mc 43,460 psi I Tr z 14,487 psi J Shar Strss Y,T 10 0-10 0 10 0 30 40 50 60-10 Th Mohr circl givs: 1 47.846 ksi 0.000 ksi 3-4.386 ksi Ma 6.116 ksi -0-30 Fac Strsss X,-T 8

What ar th DET strsss at A on th Crank Arm? At "A": Bnding M 1800 in.lb. Torsion T in.lb. A Mc 43,460 psi I Tr z 14,487 psi J Th Mohr circl for A gav: 1 47.846 ksi 0.000 ksi 3-4.386 ksi Ma 6.116 ksi Using th Principal strsss: 85 + 10 + 19 518 50.18ksi + + 3 1 3 + 3 1 1888.8 + 69.6 518.4 50.18ksi 47.8 (47.8)( 4.39) + ( 4.39) Using th Dirct strsss: 43.46 + 0 0 + 3(14.487) What ar th MSST strsss at A on th Crank Arm? At "A": Bnding M 1800 in.lb. Torsion T in.lb. A Mc 43,460 psi I Tr z 14,487 psi J Using th Principal strsss (our onl option with MSST): Th Mohr circl for A gav: 1 47.846 ksi 0.000 ksi 3-4.386 ksi Ma 6.116 ksi MSST 47.85 ( 4.39) 5. 4ksi 1 3 This numbr is slightl highr than th von Miss strss of 50. consistnt with th MSST bing mor consrvativ. 9

What ar th MSST & DET strsss at C on th Crank Arm? At C": Torsion T in.lb. Shar V 300 lb C 4V BENDING 905 psi 3A TOTAL z + BENDING 15,39 psi Pur Shar C ss pur shar, with & both zro. 15.4 So 1 15.4 & 3-15.4 MSST 1 3 15.4 ( 15.4) 30.8ksi DET using th Principal strsss: 1 1 3 + 3 15.4 (15.4)( 15.4) + ( 15.4) 3(15.4) 711.5 6.7ksi 15.4 DET using th Dirct strsss: + + 3 3(15.4) 0 + 0 0 + 3(15.4) 711.5 6.7ksi Factors of Saft Th Factor of Saft, n s, for a componnt is th ratio of th strss allowd b th componnt s matrial, dividd b th maimum strss prdictd (or masurd). W usuall us th ild strngth, S, as th allowabl strss for ductil matrials. S Hamrock s Appndi A for S. S n s ma Using th Failur Thoris, w will gnrall comput n s ithr b: S S ns ns ( 1 3) or or 0.5S n For DET (von Miss) s ma For MSST 10

Crank Arm Saft Factors n n MSST C DET C 3.5 30.8 3.75 6.7 C A n n MSST A DET A 1.91 5.4 1.99 50. This assums a matrial with S ksi. Can ou find a matrial with S ksi? Static Saft Factors A bar of AISI 1040 Stl ss a bnding and twisting load, rsulting in a bnding strss of 15 ksi and a shar strss of 6.5 ksi at its most highl strssd location. Find th MSS and th DET factors of saft against ilding. Calculat both FoS s using both Dirct strsss and Principal strsss. 11

Slcting Factors of Saft Hamrock givs guidlins for slcting Saft Factors in Sction 1.4.1. ns ns( A, B, C) ns ( D, E) Qualit of matrials, procssing, maintnanc, & inspction Environmnt (Load) control Qualit of analsis & tst Dangr to humans $$ impact 1.1 n s 3.95; 1.0 n s 1.6; so 1.1 n s 6.3 1