After receiving shipment of the three NRG TallTower 20m anemometer towers,

Similar documents
Wind Resource Data Summary Cotal Area, Guam Data Summary and Transmittal for December 2011

GAMINGRE 8/1/ of 7

WIND DATA REPORT. Vinalhaven

WIND DATA REPORT. Vinalhaven

Site Description: Tower Site

Site Description: Tower Site

WIND DATA REPORT FOR THE YAKUTAT JULY 2004 APRIL 2005

WYANDOTTE MUNICIPAL SERVICES COMMUNITY WIND ENERGY PROJECT WIND RESOUCE SUMMARY

Jackson County 2013 Weather Data

WIND DATA REPORT DARTMOUTH, MA

Jackson County 2018 Weather Data 67 Years of Weather Data Recorded at the UF/IFAS Marianna North Florida Research and Education Center

United States Climate

WIND DATA REPORT. Dartmouth, MA

What is the difference between Weather and Climate?

Missouri River Basin Water Management

Jackson County 2014 Weather Data

Webinar and Weekly Summary February 15th, 2011

The Climate of Grady County

WIND DATA REPORT. WBZ Tower, Hull, MA

Quantification of energy losses caused by blade icing and the development of an Icing Loss Climatology

The Climate of Bryan County

Jackson County 2019 Weather Data 68 Years of Weather Data Recorded at the UF/IFAS Marianna North Florida Research and Education Center

REPORT ON LABOUR FORECASTING FOR CONSTRUCTION

The Climate of Pontotoc County

Weather History on the Bishop Paiute Reservation

Colorado PUC E-Filings System

ENSO UPDATE By Joseph D Aleo, CCM

The Climate of Kiowa County

The Climate of Haskell County

WIND DATA REPORT. Savoy

Increasing Transmission Capacities with Dynamic Monitoring Systems

WIND DATA REPORT. Bishop and Clerks

ENGINE SERIAL NUMBERS

The Climate of Murray County

LONG-TERM SITE WIND DATA REPORT. Bishop and Clerks

Final WIND DATA REPORT. Narragansett School District Templeton, Massachusetts

How are adding integers and subtracting integers related? Work with a partner. Use integer counters to find 4 2. Remove 2 positive counters.

Life Cycle of Convective Systems over Western Colombia

The Climate of Marshall County

Regents Earth Science Unit 7: Water Cycle and Climate

Missouri River Basin Water Management Monthly Update

The Climate of Oregon Climate Zone 3 Southwest Interior

Colorado s 2003 Moisture Outlook

WIND DATA REPORT. WBZ Tower, Hull, MA

The Climate of Payne County

Section 6.5 Modeling with Trigonometric Functions

APPENDIX G-7 METEROLOGICAL DATA

Monthly Long Range Weather Commentary Issued: February 15, 2015 Steven A. Root, CCM, President/CEO

WIND DATA REPORT. Rockport School Complex Rockport, Massachusetts

CAMARGO RANCH, llc. CRAIG BUFORD BufordResources.com

Ohio Anemometer Loan Program (ALP) 3rd Quarter 2008 Progress Report

The Climate of Seminole County

The Climate of Oregon Climate Zone 5 High Plateau

Operation and Maintenance of Networking of CAAQM stations at Bangalore and Chennai.

5.0 WHAT IS THE FUTURE ( ) WEATHER EXPECTED TO BE?

The Climate of Texas County

8 VISIBILITY. 8.1 Setting. 8.2 Assessment Focus. Table 8-1: Key Issue for Visibility

TILT, DAYLIGHT AND SEASONS WORKSHEET

Mountain View Community Shuttle Monthly Operations Report

The Colorado Drought of 2002 in Perspective

FEB DASHBOARD FEB JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

Global Climates. Name Date

Butte County Drought Task Force December 1, :00 AM noon 202 Mira Loma Drive, Tahoe Room Oroville, CA. Agenda

Colorado PUC E-Filings System

Climate Variability. Eric Salathé. Climate Impacts Group & Department of Atmospheric Sciences University of Washington. Thanks to Nathan Mantua

Cost of Inflow Forecast Uncertainty for Day Ahead Hydropower Production Scheduling

SPECIMEN. Date Morning/Afternoon. A Level Geography H481/01 Physical systems Sample Question Paper. Time allowed: 1 hour 30 minutes PMT

Missouri River Basin Water Management Monthly Update

WIND DATA REPORT. WBZ Tower, Hull, MA

Towards a Bankable Solar Resource

Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International General Certificate of Secondary Education

Annual Average NYMEX Strip Comparison 7/03/2017

WHEN IS IT EVER GOING TO RAIN? Table of Average Annual Rainfall and Rainfall For Selected Arizona Cities

2016 Meteorology Summary

Monthly Long Range Weather Commentary Issued: APRIL 25, 2016 Steven A. Root, CCM, Chief Analytics Officer, Sr. VP, sales

CAISO Participating Intermittent Resource Program for Wind Generation

Monthly Long Range Weather Commentary Issued: APRIL 18, 2017 Steven A. Root, CCM, Chief Analytics Officer, Sr. VP,

Saudi Arabia. July present. Desert Locust Information Service FAO, Rome Red Sea coast outbreak

The Climate of Oregon Climate Zone 4 Northern Cascades

Drought in Southeast Colorado

WindPRO version Dec 2005 Printed/Page 11/04/2008 1:54 PM / 1. Meteo data report, height: 66.0 Feet

NASA Products to Enhance Energy Utility Load Forecasting

Let s Talk Climate! Nolan Doesken Colorado Climate Center Colorado State University. Yampatika Seminar February 16, 2011 Steamboat Springs, Colorado

2003 Water Year Wrap-Up and Look Ahead

CIMA Professional 2018

2015 Fall Conditions Report

CIMA Professional

CIMA Professional

CIMA Dates and Prices Online Classroom Live September August 2016

CIMA Professional 2018

GTR # VLTs GTR/VLT/Day %Δ:

Applications of Meteorological Tower Data at Kennedy Space Center

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Computing & Telecommunications Services Monthly Report January CaTS Help Desk. Wright State University (937)

Climate Change and Water Supply Research. Drought Response Workshop October 8, 2013

Florida Courts E-Filing Authority Board. Service Desk Report March 2019

Long-term Water Quality Monitoring in Estero Bay

Transcription:

NJ Wind Anemometer Loan Program New Jersey Board of Public Utilities Center for Advanced Energy Systems, Rutgers University Final Report January 16, 2009 After receiving shipment of the three NRG TallTower 20m anemometer towers, work commenced immediately. Initially, our goal was to install the anemometer on a test site to determine the specifics of tower installation. Shortly following approval from New Jersey to install anchors at our test location, the first anemometer tower was erected late in summer 2005. Our first attempt at installation was unsuccessful as the screw-in type anchors kept binding on rocks under the surface of the soil. Most of New Jersey, at least the northern portion, shares the same type of rocky soil that we encountered, so a new type of anchor was needed. We purchased two sets of arrowhead anchors from NRG Systems. Arrowhead anchors are driven into the ground via drive rod and are designed to maneuver around or break through rocks. Our second attempt at installation of the tower was much more successful with the new anchors. The anemometer remained on the test site for a few months while we monitored the condition of the tower and the provided wind measurement equipment. Although our test site would not suffice as a viable wind energy site, it was able to provide us with valuable information regarding installation and operation of the tower. During the test anemometer s tenure, we were able to contact several wind power vendors with clients that were proposing the installation of a small scale wind turbine. Most of these vendors were found on the NJCEP website. We provided such vendors with our contact information and requested that it be passed on to such clients that seemed good prospects for the use of wind power. We have received several solicitations for the use of our wind measuring equipment as a result of this. Prices of small and

medium sized wind turbines were also researched in order to give a general idea of how much installation of a small scale wind turbine would cost. This information will allow us to offer better advice in response to any questions that prospective loan clients may have. The first organization to secure the use of an anemometer was the General Square Stanley Theater located in Jersey City. The taller buildings surrounding the theater create a wind tunnel, funneling large amounts of wind over the rooftop of the theater. No tower was required for the installation, as we were able to attach the anemometer to a scaffolding construct that was erected for such a purpose. Data for the first month has been collected and will continue to be collected for each following month. The second site for the use of our anemometer towers is a farm in Long Valley. The farm itself is 80 acres, much of the area being open space and fields. Their farm is located at the top of a mountain at an elevation of 1,100 feet. They intend to convert a barn into an education center to teach children about renewable energy. Installation of the tower is scheduled for May 11. The third anemometer has been erected at Iona Hill Farms near Hackettstown, NJ. Because of the farms location near a lake, this wind speed data will help provide insight into the increase of wind speed due to proximity to bodies of water. It is generally understood that coastal winds are stronger due to minimal obstruction, but little research has been done on smaller lakes and ponds. Data is currently being collected for the 12- month period and will be analyzed as soon as all data is collected. There are also some prospective clients that we may not be able to serve in the immediate future due to our limited resources. However, we are keeping a list of organizations that are interested in the loan anemometer program as possible future

clients. Also, should one of our clients fall through or decide they do not need the anemometer for the full twelve month term; we can redistribute the anemometer to another interested party with minimal loss of time. Results: Stanley Theatre The Stanley Theatre anemometer was more of an academic pursuit than a specific feasibility study. Because of its urban location, wind patterns are both complex and unpredictable. The Stanley Theatre is located downwind of two large buildings. Our theory was that wind might be funneled through the larger buildings, as shown in Figure 1, concentrating the wind power that s available above Stanley Theatre. Figure 1: Google Maps Satellite Image of Stanley Theatre, showing possible wind funneling. As shown in figure 2, wind speeds were lower than expected.

Stanley Theater, Monthly Averaged Wind Speed 4 3.8 3.6 Wind Speed, (m/s) 3.4 3.2 3 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 2 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Figure 2 In order to fully analyze the wind potential of the location, one must look at the power density of the wind. Since power density scales with the cube of velocity, bins are used to maintain accuracy in the resultant, as shown in Figure 3. Stanley Theater Wind Speed Frequency 20000 18000 16000 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 < 3 3-3.5 3.5-4 4-4.5 4.5-5 5-5.5 5.5-6 6-6.5 6.5-7 7-7.5 7.5-8 8-8.5 8.5-9 9-9.5 9.5-10 10-10.5 >10.5 Wind Speed, 0.5 m/s bins Figure 3 The wind rose shown below in figure 4 shows the prevailing wind directions as a percentage of time.

Wind Rose for Stanley Theater, Percentage of Time in Prevailing Direction N NW NE W E SW SE S Figure 4 These data lead to final values of power density and turbulence intensity. Power density averaged to 29.7 W/m^2, and turbulence intensity averaged to about 30%. In conclusion, this location is not a good spot for a traditional horizontal axis turbine. Perhaps with the commercialization of vertical axis turbines, this location may seem more attractive. Results: Totten Family Farms A tower was erected at Totten Family Farms in Long Valley, NJ. The farm itself is 80 acres, much of the area being open space and fields. Their farm is located at the top of a mountain at an elevation of 1,100 feet. They intend to convert a barn into an education center to teach children about renewable energy. Wind Speeds

Totten Family Farms Monthly Averaged Wind Speed 6 Wind Speed (m/s) 5 4 3 2 1 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Figure 5 Wind Speed Bin Distribution Totten Family Farm, Wind Speed Distribution 16000 Frequency 10 Minute Intervals 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 < 3 3-3.5 3.5-4 4-4.5 4.5-5 5-5.5 5.5-6 6-6.5 6.5-7 7-7.5 7.5-8 8-8.5 8.5-9 9-9.5 9.5-10 10-10.5 10.5-11 11-11.5 11.5-12 12-12.5 Wind Speed, 0.5 m/s bins Figure 6 Because of malfunctioning equipment, directional data was not obtained from the Totten Family Farms anemometer. The average power density came out to 49 W/m^2, which is

better than was available at Stanley Theatre. The average wind speed was 3.7 m/s, and turbulence intensity was calculated to be 34%. While more feasible than the Stanley Theatre location, the power density is lower and the turbulence intensity was higher than we had hoped. It has been suggested that the treeline in northern New Jersey is higher than average, and that the turbulence intensity is a product of the tower being as high or lower than the treeline. A taller tower may provide more favorable results.