HL-LHC OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS

Similar documents
MD Landau Damping: Beam Transfer Functions and diffusion mechanisms

Beam-Beam DA Simulations for HL-LHC

HL-LHC ALTERNATIVES SCENARIOS

Transverse beam stability and Landau damping in hadron colliders

Gianluigi Arduini CERN - Beams Dept. - Accelerator & Beam Physics Group

The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework

OTHER MEANS TO INCREASE THE SPS 25 ns PERFORMANCE TRANSVERSE PLANE

Correction of β-beating due to beam-beam for the LHC and its impact on dynamic aperture

DYNAMIC APERTURE STUDIES FOR HL-LHC V1.0 *

LHC Run 2: Results and Challenges. Roderik Bruce on behalf of the CERN teams

COLLECTIVE EFFECTS IN THE LHC AND ITS INJECTORS

LHC Luminosity and Energy Upgrade

LUMINOSITY LEVELLING TECHNIQUES FOR THE LHC

TRANSVERSE DAMPER. W. Höfle, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland. Abstract INTRODUCTION AND HIGHLIGHTS IN Controlled Transverse Blow-up

LHC commissioning. 22nd June Mike Lamont LHC commissioning - CMS 1

Electron cloud observation in the LHC

Effective pile-up density as a measure of the experimental data quality for High-Luminosity LHC operational scenarios

PUBLICATION. Consolidated EIR design baseline: Milestone M3.6

CERN-ATS HiLumi LHC. FP7 High Luminosity Large Hadron Collider Design Study PUBLICATION

LHC Upgrade Plan and Ideas - scenarios & constraints from the machine side

Overview of LHC Accelerator

Plans for 2016 and Run 2

Main aim: Preparation for high bunch intensity operation with β*=3.5 m and crossing angle (-100 µrad in IR1 and +100 µrad in IR5)

Beam Optics & Dynamics Studies for LHC

Task 2.4 on LHC Collective Effects Studies

ULTIMATE LHC BEAM. G. Arduini, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland

FCC-hh Final-Focus for Flat-Beams: Parameters and Energy Deposition Studies

DEBRIEFING AND FOLLOW-UP OF THE LPL REVIEW

HL-LHC: parameter space, constraints & possible options

A Luminosity Leveling Method for LHC Luminosity Upgrade using an Early Separation Scheme

BEAM TESTS OF THE LHC TRANSVERSE FEEDBACK SYSTEM

Luminosity Goals, Critical Parameters

BETATRON SQUEEZE: STATUS, STRATEGY AND ISSUES

The HL-LHC Accelerator Physics Challenges

LHC accelerator status and prospects. Frédérick Bordry Higgs Hunting nd September Paris

LHC Beam Operations: Past, Present and Future

OPERATIONAL BEAMS FOR THE LHC

Status and Outlook of the LHC

HiLumi LHC FP7 High Luminosity Large Hadron Collider Design Study. Deliverable Report. Corrector magnets specifications

2008 JINST 3 S Main machine layout and performance. Chapter Performance goals

LHC Upgrade (accelerator)

6D weak-strong beam-beam simulations with SixTrack: theory and simulations

INITIAL ESTIMATES OF DYNAMIC APERTURE AND FIELD QUALITY SPECIFICATIONS *

Beam induced heat loads on the beam-screens of the twin-bore magnets in the IRs of the HL-LHC

TRANSVERSE IMPEDANCE OF LHC COLLIMATORS

IMPLEMENTATION AND EXPERIENCE WITH LUMINOSITY LEVELLING WITH OFFSET BEAM

HE-LHC Optics Development

We acknowledge the support of the European Community-Research Infrastructure Activity under the FP6 "Structuring the European Research Area"

LHC operation in 2015 and prospects for the future

Report. LHC Full Energy Exploitation Study: Operation at 7 TeV

Interface with Experimental Detector in the High Luminosity Run

Beam-induced heat loads on the beam screens of the inner triplets for the HL-LHC

Challenges and Plans for the Proton Injectors *

LHC. LHC Crabs, Status. Brief Overview. Status of Technology R&D. Status of Simulations & Experiments. Rama Calaga RFTECH, Dec 2-3, 2010

ACHIEVABLE SPACE-CHARGE TUNE SHIFT WITH LONG LIFETIME IN THE CERN PS & SPS

TUNE SPREAD STUDIES AT INJECTION ENERGIES FOR THE CERN PROTON SYNCHROTRON BOOSTER

EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH European Laboratory for Particle Physics. LHC Accelerator R&D and Upgrade Scenarios. Francesco Ruggiero

Short Introduction to CLIC and CTF3, Technologies for Future Linear Colliders

The LHC: the energy, cooling, and operation. Susmita Jyotishmati

LIS section meeting. PS2 design status. Y. Papaphilippou. April 30 th, 2007

Plans for the LHC Luminosity Upgrade Summary of the CARE-HHHAPD-LUMI-05 workshop

Run2 Problem List (Bold-faced items are those the BP Department can work on) October 4, 2002

Transverse dynamics Selected topics. Erik Adli, University of Oslo, August 2016, v2.21

LHC RUN 2: RESULTS AND CHALLENGES

Practical Lattice Design

Electron cloud effects for PS2, SPS(+) and LHC

LHC Commissioning in 2008

Progress on the Large Hadron electron Collider. O. Brüning, E. Nissen, D. Pellegrini, D. Schulte, A. Valloni, F. Zimmermann 1

LHC Studies Working Group Notes from the meeting held on 13th September 2011

Raising intensity of the LHC beam in the SPS - longitudinal plane

BEAM DYNAMICS STUDIES FOR HILUMI LHC

LUMINOSITY OPTIMIZATION AND LEVELING

Beam. RF antenna. RF cable

The Luminosity Upgrade at RHIC. G. Robert-Demolaize, Brookhaven National Laboratory

Status of the LIU project and progress on space charge studies

MULTITURN EXTRACTION BASED ON TRAPPING IN STABLE ISLANDS AT CERN PS: RECENT MEASUREMENT ADVANCES

UPGRADE ISSUES FOR THE CERN ACCELERATOR COMPLEX

Tevatron Beam-Beam Phenomena and Counter-Measures

Aperture Measurements and Implications

Simulations of HL-LHC Crab Cavity Noise using HEADTAIL

Beam-beam issues for LHC upgrade phases 1 and 2

THE HIGH LUMINOSITY LHC PROJECT 1

Beam-Beam Tune Spectra in RHIC and LHC

Elias Métral, LHC Collimation Working Group Meeting, 15/03/ /31

HiLumi LHC FP7 High Luminosity Large Hadron Collider Design Study. Deliverable Report SIMULATION MODELS FOR ENERGY DEPOSITION

Beam-beam Simulations of Hadron Colliders Tanaji Sen Fermilab, PO Box 500, Batavia, IL 60510

Longitudinal Dynamics

High performance computing simulations. for multi-particle effects in the synchrotons

Possible Uses of Rapid Switching Devices and Induction RF for an LHC Upgrade

Chapter 2. Machine Layout and Performance. 2 Machine layout and performance

MD400: LHCemittancegrowthin presence ofanexternal sourceofnoise during collision

THE PS IN THE LHC INJECTOR CHAIN

PBL (Problem-Based Learning) scenario for Accelerator Physics Mats Lindroos and E. Métral (CERN, Switzerland) Lund University, Sweden, March 19-23,

The TESLA Dogbone Damping Ring

Muon Front-End without Cooling

Large Hadron Collider at CERN

DEVELOPMENT AND BENCHMARKING OF CODES FOR SIMULATION OF BEAM-BEAM EFFECTS AT THE LHC

The LHC. Part 1. Corsi di Dottorato Corso di Fisica delle Alte Energie Maggio 2014 Per Grafstrom CERN and University of Bologna

(Lead) Ions in the LHC

HL LHC: impedance considerations for the new triplet layout in IR1 & 5

Transcription:

CERN-ACC-NOTE-2015-0009 2015-05-19 Elias.Metral@cern.ch HL-LHC OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS G. Arduini, N. Biancacci, O. Brüning, R. De Maria, M. Giovannozzi, W. Höfle, K. Li, E. Métral, J.E. Muller, Y. Papaphilippou, T. Pieloni, B. Salvant, E. Shaposhnikova, D. Valuch (CERN, Geneva, Switzerland), C. Tambasco (CERN, Geneva, Switzerland and EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland), D. Banfi, J. Barranco (EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland), A. Valishev (FNAL, Batavia, USA), A. Wolski (UNILIV, Liverpool, UK) Keywords: LHC, HL-LHC, HiLumi LHC, machine and beam parameters. Abstract The main aim of this document is to have a clearly identified set of beam and machine parameters to be used for numerical simulations. This is an internal CERN publication and does not necessarily reflect the views of the CERN management.

HL-LHC OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS G. Arduini, D. Banfi, J. Barranco, N. Biancacci, O. Brüning, R. De Maria, M. Giovannozzi, W. Höfle, K. Li, E. Métral, J.E. Muller, Y. Papaphilippou, T. Pieloni, B. Salvant, E. Shaposhnikova, C. Tambasco, A. Valishev, D. Valuch, A. Wolski The main aim of this document is to have a clearly identified set of beam and machine parameters to be used for numerical simulations. Two scenarios are discussed [1]: i) Baseline scenario. ii) Ultimate scenario. For both scenarios the main assumptions are [1]: i) New Mo-Gr collimators with a 5 µm Mo coating are installed, in LSS7 only. ii) Levelling with parallel separation in IP8. iii) Few non-colliding bunches for the experiments (for background studies). iv) Crab cavities are active providing full compensation of the crossing angle in IP1 and IP5. Reduction of the impedance of the Crab Cavities to the required level (and good control of the impedance of new equipment, in particular at large β values). v) All the existing circuits should operate at their nominal performance (e.g. non-conformities observed so far should be repaired by Run 4). Parameters at SPS 1 extraction [2] HL- LHC (standard) HL- LHC (BCMS) Beam total energy [TeV] 0.45 Particles per bunch, N [10 11 ] 2.30 Maximum number of bunches 288 εn [μm] 2.0 1.7 εl [evs] 0.66 r.m.s. energy spread (Gaussian fit) [10-4 ] 2.7 r.m.s. bunch length (Gaussian fit) [cm] 13.7 1 The Q20 optics is assumed, with a gamma transition of 17.951, 10 MV in the 200 MHz RF cavities and 1 MV in the 800 MHz RF cavities, in bunch shortening mode. The standard beam parameters are those requested by HL- LHC at injection and the BCMS beam emittance is extrapolated from Table 10 in Ref. [2] for the presently assumed acceptable space charge tune spread in the PS and SPS.

Parameters at the injection plateau after RF capture HL- LHC (standard) HL- LHC (BCMS) Beam total energy [TeV] 0.45 Particles per bunch, N [10 11 ] 2.30 εn [μm] 2.0 1.7 Total RF voltage [MV] 8 εl [evs] 0.7 r.m.s. energy spread (Gaussian fit) [10-4 ] 3.7 r.m.s. bunch length (Gaussian fit) [cm] 10.4 β * [m] in IP1/2/5/8 6/10/6/10 Optics HL- LHCV1.1 injection 4 Tunes (H/V) 62.28/60.31 Transition gamma (average B1/B2) 53.83 ±2.0 (H) ±1259 (V) ±2.0 (H) ±2.0 (V) - 170 (H) 1930 (H) Half parallel angle at the IP for LHCb (IP8) [µrad] ±30 (V) [3] Half parallel separation at IP for LHCb (IP8) [mm] ±3.5 (V) [3] Chromaticity Q (dq/(dp/p)) +3 [1] Landau octupole Current (LOF) [A] - 20 [1,4] 2 https://espace.cern.ch/hilumi/wp2/shared Documents/Filling Schemes HL- LHC/25ns_2748b_2736_2452_2524_288bpi12inj.txt 3 https://espace.cern.ch/hilumi/wp2/shared Documents/Filling Schemes HL- LHC/25ns_2604b_2592_2288_2396_288bpi12inj.txt 4 http://lhc-optics.web.cern.ch/lhc-optics/www/hllhc11/inj/index.html 5 The crossing angle in IP2 and IP8 is the sum of an external crossing angle bump and an internal spectrometer compensation bump and it depends on the spectrometer polarity. The values quoted above correspond to the configuration with the spectrometer ON providing the minimum long-range beam-beam normalized separation. The external bump extends over the triplet and D1 and D2 magnets. The internal spectrometer compensation bump extends only over the long drift space between the two Q1 quadrupoles left and right from the IP. For IP2 the vertical external crossing angle sign can be changed and therefore the same sign of the internal and external angle can be chosen to be the same. This is not possible for IP8 as the sign of the external crossing angle must be compatible with the recombination scheme.

Parameters during ramp HL- LHC (standard) HL- LHC (BCMS) Beam total energy [TeV] 0.45-7 Particles per bunch, N [10 11 ] 2.30 εn [μm] 2.0 1.7 Total RF voltage [MV] 8 (0.45 TeV) to 16 (7 TeV) linearly with time εl [evs] 0.7 (0.45 TeV) to 2.5 (7 TeV) r.m.s. energy spread (Gaussian fit) [10-4 ] 3.7 (0.45 TeV) to 1.08 (7 TeV) r.m.s. bunch length (Gaussian fit) [cm] 10.4 (0.45 TeV) to 8.1 (7 TeV) β * [m] in IP1/2/5/8 6/10/6/10 Optics HL- LHCV1.1 injection 6 (0.45 TeV) - HL- LHCV1.1 end of ramp 7 (7 TeV) Tunes (H/V) 62.28/60.31 to 62.31/60.32 Transition gamma (average B1/B2) 53.83 to 53.86 ±2 (H) [5] ±1259 (0.45 TeV) to ±240 (7 TeV) (V) scaling with p ±2.0 (H) [5] ±2.0 (V) 1930 (0.45 TeV) to - 115 (7 TeV) (H) scaling with p Half parallel angle at the IP for LHCb (IP8) [µrad] ±30 (0.45 TeV) to 0 (7 TeV) (V) [3] Half parallel separation at IP for LHCb (IP8) [mm] ±3.5 to ±2.0 (V) [3] Chromaticity Q (dq/(dp/p)) +3 [1] Landau octupole Current (LOF) [A] - 20 (0.45 TeV) to - 570 8 (7 TeV) scaling with ~ p 2 [1,4] 6 http://lhc-optics.web.cern.ch/lhc-optics/www/hllhc11/inj/index.html 7 http://lhc-optics.web.cern.ch/lhc-optics/www/hllhc11/endoframp/index.html 8 This is the maximum operating current expected for the Landau Damping octupoles.

From here onwards we have to distinguish between nominal and ultimate HL- LHC scenarios Nominal Scenario (levelling at a pile- up of 140 events/crossing) Parameters during pre- squeeze (nominal) HL- LHC (standard) HL- LHC (BCMS) Particles per bunch, N [10 11 ] 2.30 εn [μm] 2.0 1.7 εl [evs] 2.5 r.m.s. energy spread (Gaussian fit) [10-4 ] 1.08 r.m.s. bunch length (Gaussian fit) [cm] 8.1 β * [m] in IP1/2/5/8 6/10/6/10 to 0.7/10/0.7/3 Optics HL- LHCV1.1 end of ramp 9 to HL- LHCV1.1 pre- squeeze (0.7 m) Transition gamma (average B1/B2) 53.86 to 53.78 ±2.0 (H) ±240 (V) ±2.0 (H) ±2.0(V) - 115(H) Half parallel angle at the IP for LHCb (IP8) [µrad] 0 (V) [3] Half parallel separation at IP for LHCb (IP8) [mm] ±2 (V) [3] Chromaticity Q (dq/(dp/p)) +3 [6,8] Landau octupole Current (LOF) [A] - 570 [1,4,8] 9 http://lhc-optics.web.cern.ch/lhc-optics/www/hllhc11/endoframp/index.html

Parameters for the collision process (nominal) HL- LHC (standard) HL- LHC (BCMS) Particles per bunch, N [10 11 ] 2.2 Number of colliding pairs in IP1/2/5/8 (at the end of the collision process) 10 2736/2452/2736/2524 2592/2288/2592/2396 Levelled pile- up in IP1/5/8 140/140/4.5 Levelled luminosity [10 34 cm - 2 s - 1 ] in IP1/2/5/8 11 5.1/0.001/5.1/0.17 4.8/0.001/4.8/0.16 εn [μm] 2.5 εl [evs] 2.5 r.m.s. energy spread (Gaussian fit) [10-4 ] 1.08 r.m.s. bunch length (Gaussian fit)[cm] 8.1 β * [m] in IP1/2/5/8 0.7/10/0.7/3 Optics HL- LHCV1.1 pre- squeeze (0.7 m) Transition gamma (average B1/B2) 53.78 ±2.0 to 0 (H) ±240 (V) ±2.0 to ±0.138 12 (H) ±2.0 to 0 (V) - 115 (H) Half parallel angle at the IP for LHCb (IP8) [µrad] 0 (V) [3] Half parallel separation at IP for LHCb (IP8) [mm] ±2 to ±0.043 13 (V) Delay in the start of the collision process in IP1/2/5/8 Synchronised IP1 and IP5 to full head- on collision first, and then IP2 and IP8 Time to go in collision in IP1/5 (from 2 σ full separation to 0 σ) [s]. No time constraint for IP2/8 Chromaticity Q (dq/(dp/p)) +3 [6,8] Landau octupole Current (LOF) [A] - 570 [1,4,8] < 1 10 Assuming one batch less from the PS for machine protection (pilot injection, TL steering with 12 nominal bunches) and non-colliding bunches for experiments. Note that due to RF beam loading the abort gap length must not exceed the 3µs design value. 11 The value of the luminosity at which levelling is performed is calculated assuming a visible cross-section of 85 mb for point 1/2/5 and 75 mb for IP8. 12 This corresponds to the half-separation of 2.39/2.38 σ to level the luminosity to 10 31 cm -2 s -1 for the standard and BCMS beams respectively. 13 This corresponds to the half-separation of 1.35 σ to level the pile-up to 4.5 events/crossing.

Parameters in stable beams (nominal) HL- LHC (standard) HL- LHC (BCMS) Particles per bunch, N [10 11 ] 2.2 (start of fill) εn [μm] 2.5 (start of fill) Number of colliding pairs in IP1/2/5/8 10 2736/2452/2736/2524 2592/2288/2592/2396 Levelled pile- up in IP1/5/8 140/140/4.5 Levelled luminosity [10 34 cm - 2 s - 1 ] in IP1/2/5/8 11 5.1/0.001/5.1/0.17 4.8/0.001/4.8/0.16 Levelling method in IP1/2/5/8 β * /separation/β * /separation εl [evs] 2.5 (start of fill) r.m.s. energy spread (Gaussian fit) [10-4 ] 1.08 (start of fill) r.m.s. bunch length (Gaussian fit) [cm] 8.1 (start of fill) β * [m] in IP1/2/5/8 0.7 to 0.15/10/0.7 to 0.15/3 Optics HL- LHCV1.1 pre- squeeze (0.7 m) to HL- LHCV1.1 pre- squeeze (0.44 m) 14 to HL- LHCV1.1 collision round (0.15 m) 15 Transition gamma (average B1/B2) 53.78 to 53.73 [7] 0 (H) ±240 (V) [7] ±0.138 16 to 0 (H) [7] 0 (V) - 115 (H) [7] Half parallel angle at the IP for LHCb (IP8) [µrad] 0 (V) [3] Half parallel separation at IP for LHCb (IP8) [mm] ±0.043 17 to 0 (V) [1] Transverse damper damping time [turns] 50 18 [1] Chromaticity Q (dq/(dp/p)) +3 18 [6,8] Landau octupole Current (LOF) [A] - 570 18 [1,4,8] 14 http://lhc-optics.web.cern.ch/lhc-optics/www/hllhc11/presqueeze/index.html 15 http://lhc-optics.web.cern.ch/lhc-optics/www/hllhc11/round/index.html 16 This corresponds to the half-separation of 2.39/2.38 σ to level the luminosity to 10 31 cm -2 s -1 for the standard and BCMS beams respectively. 17 This corresponds to the half-separation of 1.35 σ to level the pile-up to 4.5 events/crossing. 18 The transverse damper gain, chromaticity and the octupoles should be reduced (in absolute values) as much as possible as soon as the beams are in collision in IP1 and IP5.

Ultimate Scenario (levelling at a pile- up of 210) Parameters during pre- squeeze (ultimate) HL- LHC (standard) HL- LHC (BCMS) Particles per bunch, N [10 11 ] 2.30 εn [μm] 2.0 1.7 εl [evs] 2.5 r.m.s. energy spread (Gaussian fit) [10-4 ] 1.08 r.m.s. bunch length (Gaussian fit) [cm] 8.1 β * [m] in IP1/2/5/8 6/10/6/10 to 0.46/10/0.46/3 Optics HL- LHCV1.1 end of ramp to HL- LHCV1.1 pre- squeeze (0.46 m) Transition gamma (average B1/B2) 53.86 to 53.78 ±2 (H) ±240 (V) ±2.0 (H) ±2 (V) Half external crossing angle at the IP for LHCb (IP8) 5 [µrad] - 250 (H) - 115 (H) Half parallel angle at the IP for LHCb (IP8) [µrad] 0 (V) [3] Half parallel separation at IP for LHCb (IP8) [mm] ±2 (V) [3] Chromaticity Q (dq/(dp/p)) +3 [6,8] Landau octupole Current (LOF) [A] - 570 [1,4,8]

Parameters for the collision process (ultimate) HL- LHC (standard) HL- LHC (BCMS) Particles per bunch, N [10 11 ] 2.2 Number of colliding pairs in IP1/2/5/8 (at the end of the collision process) 10 2736/2452/2736/2524 2592/2288/2592/2396 Levelled pile- up in IP1/5/8 210/210/4.5 Levelled luminosity [10 34 cm - 2 s - 1 ] in IP1/2/5/8 11 7.6/0.001/7.6/0.17 7.2/0.001/7.2/0.16 εn [μm] 2.5 εl [evs] 2.5 r.m.s. energy spread (Gaussian fit) [10-4 ] 1.08 r.m.s. bunch length (Gaussian fit) [cm] 8.1 β * [m] in IP1/2/5/8 0.46/10/0.46/3 Optics HL- LHCV1.1 pre- squeeze (0.46 m) Transition gamma (average B1/B2) 53.78 ±2 to 0 (H) ±240 (V) ±2.0 to ±0.138 19 (H) ±2 to 0 (V) - 115 (H) Half parallel angle at the IP for LHCb (IP8) [µrad] 0 (V) (1) Half parallel separation at IP for LHCb (IP8) [mm] ±2 to ±0.043 20 (V) Delay in the start of the collision process in IP1/2/5/8 Synchronised IP1 and IP5 to full head- on collision first, and then IP2 and IP8 Time to go in collision in IP1/5 (from 2 σ full separation to 0 σ) [s]. No time constraint for IP2/8 Chromaticity Q (dq/(dp/p)) +3 [6,8] Landau octupole Current (LOF) [A] - 570 [1,4,8] < 1 19 This corresponds to the half-separation of 2.39/2.38 σ to level the luminosity to 10 31 cm -2 s -1 for the standard and BCMS beams respectively. 20 This corresponds to the half-separation of 1.35 σ to level the pile-up to 4.5 events/crossing.

Parameters in stable beams (ultimate) HL- LHC (standard) HL- LHC (BCMS) Particles per bunch, N [10 11 ] 2.2 (start of fill) εn [μm] 2.5 (start of fill) Number of colliding pairs in IP1/2/5/8 10 2736/2452/2736/2524 2592/2288/2592/2396 Levelled pile- up in IP1/5/8 210/210/4.5 Levelled luminosity [10 34 cm - 2 s - 1 ] in IP1/2/5/8 11 7.6/0.001/7.6/0.17 7.2/0.001/7.2/0.16 Levelling method in IP1/2/5/8 β * /separation/β * /separation εl [evs] 2.5 (start of fill) r.m.s. energy spread (Gaussian fit) [10-4 ] 1.08 (start of fill) r.m.s. bunch length (Gaussian fit) [cm] 8.1 (start of fill) β * [m] in IP1/2/5/8 0.46 to 0.15/10/0.46 to 0.15/3 Optics HL- LHCV1.1 pre- squeeze (0.46 m) to HL- LHCV1.1 pre- squeeze (0.44 m) 14 to HL- LHCV1.1 collision round (0.15 m) 15 Transition gamma (average B1/B2) 53.78 to 53.73 [7] 0 (H) ±240 (V) [7] ±0.138 19 to 0 (H) [7] 0 (V) - 115 (H) [7] Half parallel angle at the IP for LHCb (IP8) [µrad] 0 (V) (1) Half parallel separation at IP for LHCb (IP8) [mm] ±0.043 20 to 0 (V) Transverse damper damping time [turns] 50 18 [1] Chromaticity Q (dq/(dp/p)) +3 18 [6,8] Landau octupole Current (LOF) [A] - 570 18 [1,4,8] References [1] Métral, Elias. Operational scenarios. 38th HiLumi WP2 Task Leader Meeting (05/12/2014). [2] Arduini, Gianluigi, et al., Beam parameters at LHC injection. 2014. CERN- ACC-2014-0006. [3] Fartoukh, Stephane. LHCb crossing scheme for Run II & III. LHC Machine Committee Meeting n.167 (19/6/2013). [4] Tambasco, Claudia, et al., Beam-beam and octupoles stability diagrams for HL-LHC optics, CERN HSC meeting (17/12/2014).

[5] Pieloni, Tatiana, et al., HL-LHC operational scenario: Beam-beam considerations on table parameters, CERN HL-LHC WP2 Task 2.4-2.7 meeting (25/03/2015). [6] HSC section meetings on 23/03/15, 30/03/15 and 13/04/15 (https://espace.cern.ch/be-dep/abp/hsc/sitepages/minutesofmeetings.aspx). [7] Banfi, Danilo, et al., Beam-beam effects for round optics: DA simulations summary, 44 th HiLumi WP2 Task leader Meeting, 20 th March 2015 (https://indico.cern.ch/event/376192/contribution/2/material/slides/0.pdf). [8] Banfi, Danilo, et al., Dynamic aperture studies with beam-beam, octupoles and chromaticity effects, 46 th HiLumi WP2 Task leader Meeting, 10 th April 2015 (https://indico.cern.ch/event/376194/contribution/2/material/slides/0.pdf).