arxiv: v1 [hep-th] 3 Feb 2016

Similar documents
arxiv:hep-th/ v2 15 Jan 2004

Gauss-Bonnet Black Holes in ds Spaces. Abstract

A rotating charged black hole solution in f (R) gravity

arxiv: v3 [hep-th] 22 Jul 2017

Thermodynamics of Static Black Objects in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet Gravity

Gauss-Bonnet Gravity with Scalar Field in Four Dimensions

Black holes and the renormalisation group 1

κ = f (r 0 ) k µ µ k ν = κk ν (5)

WHY BLACK HOLES PHYSICS?

Holography for 3D Einstein gravity. with a conformal scalar field

arxiv: v2 [hep-th] 21 Oct 2015

Exact Solutions in Five-Dimensional Axi-dilaton Gravity with Euler-Poincaré Term

Thermodynamics in modified gravity Reference: Physics Letters B 688, 101 (2010) [e-print arxiv: [gr-qc]]

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 31 Jan 2006

arxiv: v1 [hep-th] 20 Jul 2016

arxiv:gr-qc/ v2 1 Oct 1998

arxiv:gr-qc/ v1 26 Aug 1997

D. f(r) gravity. φ = 1 + f R (R). (48)

AdS and Af Horndeski black hole solutions in four dimensions

Holography on the Horizon and at Infinity

entropy Thermodynamics of Horizons from a Dual Quantum System Full Paper Entropy 2007, 9, ISSN c 2007 by MDPI

TeV-scale Black Holes

The Role of Black Holes in the AdS/CFT Correspondence

Accelerating Cosmologies and Black Holes in the Dilatonic Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet (EGB) Theory

New Model of massive spin-2 particle

Holographic c-theorems and higher derivative gravity

Colliding scalar pulses in the Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity

Black Hole Evaporation and Higher-Derivative Gravity I

arxiv:gr-qc/ v2 18 Feb 2003

Gravity in the Braneworld and

Towards a 2nd Law for Lovelock Theory

Thermodynamics in Modified Gravity Theories Reference: Physics Letters B 688, 101 (2010) [e-print arxiv: [gr-qc]]

Brane Gravity from Bulk Vector Field

On the Hawking Wormhole Horizon Entropy

Black hole entropy of gauge fields

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 15 Mar 1996

Black Holes in Higher-Derivative Gravity. Classical and Quantum Black Holes

arxiv: v2 [hep-th] 5 Apr 2016

arxiv: v1 [hep-th] 11 Sep 2008

Quantum Gravity and Black Holes

Collapse of Kaluza-Klein Bubbles. Abstract. Kaluza-Klein theory admits \bubble" congurations, in which the

Modelling the evolution of small black holes

Warp Duality in Braneworlds

arxiv: v2 [gr-qc] 25 Sep 2013

Collider Production of TeV Scale Black Holes and Higher-Curvature Gravity

Do semiclassical zero temperature black holes exist?

Black Holes at the LHC

Large Mass Hierarchy from a Small Extra Dimension

arxiv:hep-th/ v3 16 May 2006

Brane factories S. Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL USA 2 Center for Theoretical Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology,

Theoretical Aspects of Black Hole Physics

Second law of black-hole thermodynamics in Lovelock theories of gravity

arxiv: v1 [hep-th] 18 Apr 2007

Some simple exact solutions to d = 5 Einstein Gauss Bonnet Gravity

th Aegean Summer School / Paros Minás Tsoukalás (CECs-Valdivia)

Black hole thermodynamics under the microscope

Non-Rotating BTZ Black Hole Area Spectrum from Quasi-normal Modes

Quasilocal vs Holographic Stress Tensor in AdS Gravity

Mass and thermodynamics of Kaluza Klein black holes with squashed horizons

Brane-World Black Holes

Braneworld in f(r) gravity and critical gravity

arxiv:gr-qc/ v1 4 Jun 2003

Traversable wormholes: Some simple examples

Constrained BF theory as gravity

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 27 May 2004

Microscopic entropy of the charged BTZ black hole

Formation and Evaporation of Regular Black Holes in New 2d Gravity BIRS, 2016

arxiv:gr-qc/ v1 29 Nov 1994

Black-Hole Solutions with Scalar Hair in Einstein-Scalar-Gauss-Bonnet Theories

Brane in the Relativistic Theory of Gravitation

Dynamically generated embeddings of spacetime

arxiv: v2 [gr-qc] 27 Apr 2013

arxiv: v2 [gr-qc] 22 Jan 2014

arxiv: v2 [gr-qc] 1 Oct 2009

Braneworlds: gravity & cosmology. David Langlois APC & IAP, Paris

arxiv:hep-th/ v3 25 Sep 2006

NONLOCAL MODIFIED GRAVITY AND ITS COSMOLOGY

LOCALIZATION OF FIELDS ON A BRANE IN SIX DIMENSIONS.

Black Hole Entropy and Gauge/Gravity Duality

EXTREMELY CHARGED STATIC DUST DISTRIBUTIONS IN GENERAL RELATIVITY

Causality, hyperbolicity, and shock formation in Lovelock theories

A. Larrañaga 1,2 1 Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Observatorio Astronomico Nacional. 1 Introduction

Thermodynamics of f(r) Gravity with the Disformal Transformation

BRANE COSMOLOGY and Randall-Sundrum model

arxiv:hep-th/ v2 24 Sep 1998

Black hole thermodynamics

AdS/CFT duality. Agnese Bissi. March 26, Fundamental Problems in Quantum Physics Erice. Mathematical Institute University of Oxford

Entanglement and the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy

GRAVITY: THE INSIDE STORY

Extended phase space thermodynamics for AdS black holes

THE 2D ANALOGUE OF THE REISSNER-NORDSTROM SOLUTION. S. Monni and M. Cadoni ABSTRACT

Spherically symmetric

An Overview of Mathematical General Relativity

Dynamical compactification from higher dimensional de Sitter space

Reentrant phase transitions and van der Waals behaviour for hairy black holes

1. Introduction. [Arkani-Hamed, Dimopoulos, Dvali]

Wave function of the quantum black hole

arxiv:gr-qc/ v1 7 Sep 1998

arxiv: v1 [physics.gen-ph] 15 Feb 2011

arxiv: v1 [hep-th] 4 Sep 2008

Transcription:

Noname manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Thermodynamics of Asymptotically Flat Black Holes in Lovelock Background N. Abbasvandi M. J. Soleimani Shahidan Radiman W.A.T. Wan Abdullah G. Gopir Received: date / Accepted: date arxiv:1602.01359v1 [hep-th] 3 Feb 2016 Abstract We study the thermodynamics of the asymptotically flat static black hole in Lovelock back ground where the coupling constants of the Lovelock theory effects are taken into account. We consider the effects of the second order of the coupling constant, and third order of the Lovelock constant coefficient on the thermodynamics of asymptotically flat static black holes. In this case the effect of the coupling constants on the thermodynamics of the black hole are discussed for 5, 6, and 7 dimensional spacetime. Keywords Lovelock Theory Thermodynamics Hawking temperature Entropy Higher Dimensions PACS 04.50.Kd, 04.70.Dy N. Abbasvandi School of Applied Physics, FST, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, 43600, Malaysia Tel.: +603-8921-5419 Fax: +603-8925-6086 E-mail: Niloofar@siswa.ukm.edu.my M. J. Soleimani Physics Department, University of Malaya, KL, 50603, Malaysia Tel.: +603-7967 4201 Fax: +603-7956 6343 E-mail: msoleima@cern.ch Shahidan Radiman School of Applied Physics, FST, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, 43600, Malaysia Tel.: +603-8921-5419 Fax: +603-8925-6086 E-mail: Shahidan@ukm.edu.my W.A.T. Wan Abdullah Physics Department, University of Malaya, KL, 50603, Malaysia Tel.: +603-7967 4201 Fax: +603-7956 6343 E-mail: wat@um.edu.my G. Gopir School of Applied Physics, FST, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, 43600, Malaysia Tel.: +603-8921-5419 Fax: +603-8925-6086 E-mail: gkagopir@ukm.edu.my

2 N. Abbasvandi et al. 1 Introduction One of the possible solutions to the hierarchy problem, is a class of models in which extra spatial dimensions [1,2,3,4] give rise to strong gravity due to the fact that in 4 + n dimensions the fundamental Planck mass (MD) can be as low as few TeV. The most significant consequence of the low-scale gravity, is the possibility of production of the TeV-scale black holes in particle colliers, such as Large Hadron Collier (LHC) [5] and the available energy must be well above the fundamental Planck scale [6]. In string theory, in addition to Einstein-Hilbert term, there are higher curvature corrections [7]. On the other hand, higher dimensional black holes have been used to analyzed strongly coupled finite temperature field theories. So, extension of Einstein gravitational theory into those with higher power of curvature in higher dimensions is natural. In this regards, the Lovelock theory of gravity is a candidate belonging to such class of theories [8,9] which had received a lot of attention, in particular, in the brane world scenario, low energy string theory, and black hole thermodynamics. Since the thermodynamic property of black hole is essentially a quantum feature of gravity, it is expected to gain some insights into quantum gravity in the field of black hole thermodynamics. In this case, the effective action proposed by Lovelock [8] contains the higher powers of curvature in particular combinations and the only produced field equations are the second order one which consequently arise no ghosts [10]. In this case, the action is precisely of the form I G = d d x gl (1) where L denotes the corresponding Lagrangian. Here, we consider the first four terms of the Lovelock gravity which is up to the third order. The combination of these terms in d 7 is the most general Lagrangian producing second order field equations. It is very difficult to find out nontrivial exact analytical solutions of Einstein s equation with the higher curvature terms due to the non linearity of the field equations and mostly need to adopt some approximation methods or find numerical solutions. Wheeler has found [11] exact static spherically symmetric black hole solutions of the Gauss-Bonnet (the second order Lovelock) gravity. Also, one can find related solution of the Einstein-Maxwell-Gauss-Bonnet and Einstein- Born-Infeld-Gauss-Bonnet models in Refs [12, 13]. The thermodynamics of the charged static spherically black hole solutions has been considered in [14] and of charged solutions in [15]. In this paper we want to find new static solutions of third order Lovelock gravity by using algebraic equation (see Eq.(9)) which are asymptotically flat and contain second and third order coupling constant of Lovelock gravitational theory and investigate their thermodynamics. In this case, we will investigate the effect of the coupling constants on Hawking temperature and Bekenstein-Hawking entropy as well, specially in 7 and 8 dimensional spacetime. The outline of the paper is as follows. In section 2, we briefly review Lovelock theory and we obtain general algebraic equation. In section 3, we present the

Thermodynamics of Asymptotically Flat Black Holes in Lovelock Background 3 static solution of the third order Lovelock theory and investigate the thermodynamic parameters for seven dimensional spacetime. We obtain the solution for eight dimensional spacetime and investigate its thermodynamical properties in section 4. The final section 5 is devoted to conclusion and discussion. 2 Lovelock Black Hole Spacetime One of the natural generalization of Einstein theory in higher dimensional spacetime is Lovelock gravity [8] which maintains the properties of Einstein equation. Thus, for Eq. (1), the effective action, we consider third order Lovelock black hole with a cosmological constant term, where the corresponding Lagrangian is given by L = (D 1)/2 m=0 c m l m (2) where c m is an arbitrary constant and l m is the Euler density of 2k-dimensional manifolds which is defined by l m = 1 2 m δ1ξ1...mξm 1ν 1... mν m R 1ξ 1 1ν 1...R mξ m mν m. (3) In Eq. (3), δ 1ξ1...mξm 1ν 1... mν m and R 1ν 1 1ξ 1 are the generalized totally antisymmetric Kronecker delta and the Reimann tensor in D dimension respectively. We would like to draw attention that in d dimensions, all terms for which k ( d 1 2 ) ( are identically equal to zero, and the term k = d 1 ) 2 is a topological term. So, the only term for which k ( ) d 1 2 are contributing to the field equations. Hereafter, we set c 0 = 2Λ, c 1 = 1, c 2 = α/2, c 3 = β/3, c m = 0 (for 4 m), and G = h = c = 1. So, the second and third order of the Lagrangian terms are given by l 2 = R νρσ R νρσ 4R ν R ν + R 2 (4) and l 3 = 24R ν ρσ R ρ ν R σ ν 24R ν ρσ R ρη ν R σ η + 3RR ν ρσ R ρσ ν +8R ν ρσ R ρη κ R κσ νη + 2R ν ρσ R ρσ ηκ R ηκ ν + 16R ν R ν ρ R ρ 12RR ν R ν + R 3. (5) One can then derive the Lovelock equation with respect to the metric as follows 0 = ϑ ξ = Λδ ξ + G (1)ξ + αg (2)ξ + βg (3)ξ (6) where G (1)ξ is the Einstein tensor and G (2)ξ & G (3)ξ are the second and the third order of Lovelock tensors respectively. It was shown [11,16] that there exist static exact black hole solutions of the equation (6). In this case, the line element takes the following form ds 2 = f (r) dt 2 + f 1 (r) dr 2 + r 2 γ ij dx i dx j (7)

4 N. Abbasvandi et al. where γ ij is the metric of D 2 dimensional constant curvature space. In order to determine the function f (r) by Eq. (6), it is convenient to define a new variable ψ (r) as f (r) = ζ r 2 ψ (r) (8) with the constant curvature ζ = 1, 0 or 1. Then, after calculating Riemann tensor components and substituting into (6), one can obtain an algebraic equation as follows k m=2 [ a m m { 2m 2 q=1 (n q) } ψ m ] + ψ 2Λ n (n + 1) = r n+1 (9) where Λ is cosmological constant, am m = c m, and is an integration constant related to ADM mass as M = 2π(n+1)/2 Γ ((n+1)/2) [15], where we used a unit 16πG = 1. In the following section we obtain the exact solution for static black holes and its thermodynamical properties for 7 dimensional spacetime. 3 Thermodynamics of the Lovelock Black Holes The most general second order differential equation which presents the solutions of gravity is the gravitational field equation of third order Lovelock gravity in seven dimensions. In order to obtain seven dimensional static asymptotically solution of third order of the Lovelock gravity, we set ζ = 1 and Λ = 0 and we consider only positive mass black holes 0. In the case of n = 3, the theory is reduced to Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet theory and its related f (r) reads f (r) = 1 r2 + r 4 + 4α. (10) 2α So, for black hole solution (7) considering (10), one can find the Hawking temperature as the inverse of the special value of the period of the Euclidean time by using T H = f (r) 4π r=r+ as follow ( r+4 ) TH 5 (r + ) = 1 2 r + + 4α r + 4π α (11) r +4 + 4α Therefore, the behavior of the Hawking temperature crucially depends on the second and third order coupling constants of the Lovelock gravity theory. The Hawking temperature always increases monotonically from T = 0 at r + = 0 for small horizon radius (see Figure 1). Figure 2 shows the effect of the α variations on the temperature. By the way, maximum of the temperature decreases by increasing of the second order coupling constant of the Lovelocke gravity in 5 dimensional asymptotically flat spacetime. we see that, as expected, (11) behaves like the Hawking temperature of a GR solution if the black hole is large enough. On the other hand, temperature tends to zero for small values.

Thermodynamics of Asymptotically Flat Black Holes in Lovelock Background 5 Fig. 1 Hawking temperature vs. r Fig. 2 Hawking temperature with respect to the different αs for n = 3 It is easy to verify that the Hawking temperature associated to the solution in n = 4 (d = 6 dimension) is given by TH 6 (r + ) = 1 r 2 + r + (r +5 + 12α) r 5 + + 3α 4π 3r + α r + (r +5 + 12α) (12) which implies that in d = 6 dimensional case, the Hawking temperature is related just to the second order of the Lovelock coupling constant same as the d = 5 dimensional case. It is worth pointing out that for dimension 6 the functional form of the temperature is substantially different from the case d = 6, as it includes an additional term which is actually proportional to α. In this case, figure 3 shows that the temperature decreases by increasing the α. In order to obtain the temperature for d = 7 dimension, substituting n = 5 into Eq. (9), we obtain a simple equation as 8βΨ 3 + 6αΨ 2 + Ψ = r 6 (13)

6 N. Abbasvandi et al. Fig. 3 Hawking temperature with respect to the different αs for n = 3 Then, one can easily find ψ and by using Eq. (8) obtain the function f (r) as follows f (r) = 1 ( 27α3 r 6 +27αr 6 β+108β 2 +3ξβ) 1 3 12β + αr2 4β r 4 (3α 2 2β) 4β( 27α 3 r 6 +27αr 6 β+108β 2 +3ξβ) 1 3 (14) where ξ = ( 27α 2 r 12 + 24βr 12 648α 3 r 6 + 648αβr 6 + 1296β 2 2) 1 2 and solution (10) has only one branch unlike the solutions in Gauss-Bonnet gravity which have two branches. Indeed, Eq. (10) with above αs and βs has one real solution and two complex solutions. The Hawking temperature of the black holes can be obtained by requiring the absence of conical singularity at the event horizon in the Euclidean sector of the black hole solution which can be obtained by analytical continuation of the metric. We continue analytically the metric by t iτ which yields the Euclidean section. The regularity at r = r + requires that we should identify τ τ + β + where f (r + ) = 0 and β + is the inverse Hawking temperature of the event horizon given as where β 1 + = T 7 H (r + ) = 1 4π + r +4 (3α 2 2β)γ 12β( 27α 3 r +6 +27αr +6 β+108β 2 +3ξβ) 4/3 r +3 (3α 2 2β) β( 27α 3 r +6 +27αr +6 β+108β 2 +3ξβ) 2 3 γ 36( 27α 3 r 6 + +27αr 6 + β+108β 2 +3ξβ) 2/3 β + αr+ 2β (15) γ = 162α 3 r + 5 + 162αr + 5 β + 3β( 324α2 r + 11 +288βr + 11 3888α 3 r + 5 +3888αβr +5 ) 2ξ ξ = ( 27α 2 r + 12 + 24βr + 12 648α 3 r + 6 + 648αβr + 6 + 1296β 2 2) 1 2. (16)

Thermodynamics of Asymptotically Flat Black Holes in Lovelock Background 7 Fig. 4 The α s effects on the Hawking temperature for different β. Clearly here, the temperature is related to the second order coupling constant as the 5 and 6 dimensional case. Also, it depends on the third order constant of Lovelock as well as second order. Figure 4 shows the α effects on the Hawking temperature of fixed β. We also show the effect of β of fixed α. It is seen that, the Hawking temperature increases when the second order constant of the Lovelock increases but the Hawking temperature decreases when the third order constant of the Lovelock increases (see Figure 4 and 5). We have shown that in the absence of the second order constant, α, the third order constant of the Lovelock, β, still decreases the Hawking temperature (Figure 6). In general, the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy of black holes satisfies the socalled area law of entropy which states that the black hole entropy equals one-quarter of the horizon area, S = A 4 [17]. However, in higher derivative gravity the area law of entropy is not satisfied mostly [18].The entropy per unit volume obeys the law of the entropy of asymptotically flat black holes of

8 N. Abbasvandi et al. Fig. 5 The β s effects on the Hawking temperature for different α. Fig. 6 The effect of β on the Hawking temperature in the absence of the α

Thermodynamics of Asymptotically Flat Black Holes in Lovelock Background 9 pth-order Lovelock gravity [19] S = 1 4 p kα k k=1 d n 1 x g l k 1 (17) where the integration is done on the (n 1)-dimensional space like hypersurface of Killing horizon, l k 1 is the kth order Lovelock Lagrangian of g ν which is the induced metric on it and g is the determinant of g ν. By the way, a simple method of finding the entropy is through the use of first law of thermodynamics, dm = T ds [20]. The horizon radius s tarts from zero when the mass parameter is nonnegative. So, by integrating the first law, the entropy reads r + ( ) M S = T 1 dr +. (18) r + in this case, one can obtain the entropy for n = 3 as follows 0 S 5 = 8 π ( 2/5r + 5 + αr + ) (19) which is related to the α as second order constant of the Lovelock theory. Figure 7 shows the entropy deviation by variation of the α and the entropy decreases when the α increases. In the same way, one can compute the entropy for 6 dimensional asymptotically flat black hole in Lovelock back ground as follows S 6 = 1/4 πr+6 + + 3πr+ 5 80 + 3πr+ 4 512 + πr+ 3 1024 + 3πr+ 2 16384 + 3πr+ 65536 (3/8 πr+4 + 1/16 πr+ 3 + 27πr+ 2 4 + 3πr+ 2 256 + 9πr+ 8 + 3πr+ 1024 ) α + O ( α 2) (20) where we neglect the terms related to α 2 as it is so small. In this case, it is interesting that increasing of the α caused increase of the entropy (see figure 8). If we set n = 5 by using equations (15) and (16), the entropy of the 7 dimensional spacetime, S 7, reads S 7 = r + 0 [ 648π ( r 2 + 3α ) ( αr 6 + 4β ) ( β ( αr 6 + 4β )) 4/3 81(β (αr 6 + 4β)) 4/3 α 3 54(αβr 6 ) 2/3 βr 10 27 3 54(αβr 6 ) 2/3 αβr + O ( ] α n 3, β n 3) dr 4 (21) Solving (21) analytically is not straightforward but one can use some numerical methods in order to compute the entropy. However, we can neglect α and β higher than order of 3. Obviously, the entropy for 7 dimensional asymptotically flat black hole in Lovelock back ground is related to the second and third order of the coupling constant of the Lovelock gravity theory.

10 N. Abbasvandi et al. Fig. 7 The effect of α on the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy for n = 3 Fig. 8 The effect of α on the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy for n = 4 4 Conclusion In this paper, we have calculated the Hawking temperature (equations (11), (12), (15)) and the Bekenestein-Hawking entropy (equations (19), (20), (21)) of the asymptotically flat black hole in Lovelock background for 5,6, and 7 dimensional spacetime by using a general algebraic equation (9). In this case, the coupling constant of the Lovelock gravity theory take into account up to the third order. It is evident that the thermodynamic parameters, like Hawking temperature and the entropy, are related to the second order of the coupling constant of the Lovelock for n = 3, 4. In this manner, for 7 dimensional case, they are related to the second and third order of the constant of the Lovelock. We have found, in case of n = 3 the maximum of the temperature decreases when the α increase as well as the entropy in a fixed mass. For 6 dimensional case, the temperature decreases with increasing α. We have investigated the effects of the coupling constants of the Lovelock theory on the temperature and entropy in d = 7 as well. We have calculated the temperature analytically but we found that the entropy equation (21) needs to be solved numerically. In

Thermodynamics of Asymptotically Flat Black Holes in Lovelock Background 11 this case, both the temperature and the entropy are related to the second and third order of the coupling constant of the Lovelock gravity theory. It is evident the Hawking temperature increases when the α increases but it decreases with increasing β (see figure 4 and 5). We have shown that variation of the α is more effective on the thermodynamics of the black holes rather than β. Acknowledgment The paper is supported by Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (Grant No. FRGS/2/2013/ST02/UKM/02/2) and University of Malaya (Grant No. Ru-023-2014). References 1. N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, and G. Divali, Phys. lett. B 429 (1998) 263-272. 2. I. Antoniadis, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, and G. Divali, Phys. lett. B 436 (1998) 257-263. 3. N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, and G. Divali, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 086004. 4. L. Randall, and R. Sundrum Phys. Rev. lett. 83 (1999) 4690. 5. S. Dimopoulos and G. Landsberg, Phys. Rev. Lett 87 (2001) 161602. 6. S. Giddings and S. Thomas, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 056010. 7. D. G. Boulware, and S. Deser, Phys. Rev. Lett 55 (1985) 2656. 8. D. Lovelock, J. Math. Phys. 12 (1971) 498. 9. C. Charmousis,Lect. Notes Phys. 769 (2009) 299. arxiv:0805.0568n[gr-qc] 10. B. Zwiebach, Phys. Lett. B 156 (1985) 315; B. Zumino, Phys. Rep 137 (1986) 109. 11. J. T. Wheeler, Nucl. Phys. B 273 (1986) 732. 12. D. L. Wiltshire, Phys. Lett. B 169 (1986) 36. 13. D. L. Wiltshire, Phys. Rev. D 38 (1988) 2445. 14. J. E. Lidsey, S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, JHEP 06 (2002) 026. 15. R. C. Myers and J. S. Simon, Phys. Rev. D 38 (1988) 2434. 16. R. G. Cai, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 084014; R. G. Cai, Phys. Lett. B 582 (2004) 237. 17. J. D. Beckenstein, Phys. Rev. D 7 (1973) 2333. 18. M. Lu, and M. B. Wise, Phys. Rev. D 47 (1993) R3095. 19. T. Jacobson and R. C. Myers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993) 3684. 20. R. M. Wald, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) R3427.