The Kerbal Space Program

Similar documents
EHC Mission V. Introduction. Age of Student(s) Objectives. Author: TeacherGaming Date: November 5, 2015

Astromechanics. 6. Changing Orbits

MAE 180A: Spacecraft Guidance I, Summer 2009 Homework 4 Due Thursday, July 30.

THE TRAJECTORY CONTROL STRATEGIES FOR AKATSUKI RE-INSERTION INTO THE VENUS ORBIT

ASEN 6008: Interplanetary Mission Design Lab Spring, 2015

AS3010: Introduction to Space Technology

Low-Energy Return from Europa

The Interstellar Boundary Explorer (IBEX) Mission Design: A Pegasus Class Mission to a High Energy Orbit

INDIRECT PLANETARY CAPTURE VIA PERIODIC ORBIT ABOUT LIBRATION POINTS

GEOL212 Due 9/24/18 Homework 4

MAE 180A: Spacecraft Guidance I, Summer 2009 Homework 2 Due Tuesday, July 14, in class.

Patch Conics. Basic Approach

Satellite Orbital Maneuvers and Transfers. Dr Ugur GUVEN

Assignment #0 Using Stellarium

LAUNCH SYSTEMS. Col. John Keesee. 5 September 2003

From Kerbal Space Program Wiki

Interplanetary Mission Opportunities

Responsive Imaging Constellations for Support of Geographically Dispersed Theaters

The Launch of Gorizont 45 on the First Proton K /Breeze M

Go Learn In Space (Educational Fun with Orbiter)

Optimal Gravity Assisted Orbit Insertion for Europa Orbiter Mission

ORBITAL CHARACTERISTICS DUE TO THE THREE DIMENSIONAL SWING-BY IN THE SUN-JUPITER SYSTEM

ASTRIUM. Interplanetary Path Early Design Tools at ASTRIUM Space Transportation. Nathalie DELATTRE ASTRIUM Space Transportation.

An Update on EUMETSAT Programmes and Plans. Dieter Klaes on behalf of EUMETSAT teams

Final Examination 2015

Mission Overview. EAGLE: Study Goals. EAGLE: Science Goals. Mission Architecture Overview

Previous Lecture. Orbital maneuvers: general framework. Single-impulse maneuver: compatibility conditions

Planning, Simulation, and Assessment of Various Missions from Wallops Flight Facility using Satellite Toolkit (STK)

Orbit Design Marcelo Suárez. 6th Science Meeting; Seattle, WA, USA July 2010

Mission Design Options for Solar-C Plan-A

RAPID GEOSYNCHRONOUS TRANSFER ORBIT ASCENT PLAN GENERATION. Daniel X. Junker (1) Phone: ,

21 Flight checklists Mission 1: Delta-glider to ISS

PHYS 407S: General Physics I Hybrid Studio. Studio Activities. Kai Germaschewski Michael Briggs

End of Life Re-orbiting The Meteosat-5 Experience

LABORATORY II DESCRIPTION OF MOTION IN TWO DIMENSIONS

In the previous lecture, we discussed the basics of circular orbits. Mastering even circular orbits

Mars Awaits. The Scenarios necessary for this tutorial can also be downloaded here:

LECSS Physics 11 Introduction to Physics and Math Methods 1 Revised 8 September 2013 Don Bloomfield

SOLVING THE INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION (ISS) MOTION CONTROL LONG-TERM PLANNING PROBLEM

Astrodynamics (AERO0024)

Optimal Generalized Hohmann Transfer with Plane Change Using Lagrange Multipliers

CHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE

Mission Scenarios for a Controlled Lunar Impact of a Small Satellite

2024 Mars Sample Return Design Overview

The Astrodynamics and Mechanics of Orbital Spaceflight

SPACE DEBRIS REMOVAL

NAVIGATION & MISSION DESIGN BRANCH

Pico-Satellite Orbit Control by Vacuum Arc Thrusters as Enabling Technology for Formations of Small Satellites

The B-Plane Interplanetary Mission Design

Lecture D30 - Orbit Transfers

APOPHIS EXPRESS, A UNIQUE OPPORTUNITY FOR A HUMAN VISIT TO A NEO IN 2029

SAFETY GUIDED DESIGN OF CREW RETURN VEHICLE IN CONCEPT DESIGN PHASE USING STAMP/STPA

DEPARTMENT OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, IIT MADRAS M.Tech. Curriculum

Escape Trajectories from Sun Earth Distant Retrograde Orbits

BUILDING LOW-COST NANO-SATELLITES: THE IMPORTANCE OF A PROPER ENVIRONMENTAL TESTS CAMPAIGN. Jose Sergio Almeida INPE (Brazil)

PROBLEM SCORE Problem 1 (30 Pts) Problem 2 (30 Pts) Choose Problem #2 or #3! Problem 4 (40 Pts) TOTAL (100 Pts)

Celestial Mechanics Lecture 10

Launch strategy for Indian lunar mission and precision injection to the Moon using genetic algorithm

Successful Demonstration for Upper Stage Controlled Re-entry Experiment by H-IIB Launch Vehicle

COLLISION RISK ASSESSMENT AND MITIGATION STRATEGY FOR THE GSOC GEO SATELLITES

OPTIMISATION COMPETITION

A Comparison of Low Cost Transfer Orbits from GEO to LLO for a Lunar CubeSat Mission

Rocket Science 102 : Energy Analysis, Available vs Required

Chapter 8. Precise Lunar Gravity Assist Trajectories. to Geo-stationary Orbits

Engineering Sciences and Technology. Trip to Mars

Senior Design I. Project: Mars Sample Return Mission. Group Members: Samuel Johnson (Group Leader) Jairus Adams Lamek Odak Demond Duke

MARYLAND. The Design Process Regression Analysis Level I Design Example: UMd Exploration Initiative U N I V E R S I T Y O F.

Traveling Into Space. Use Target Reading Skills. How Do Rockets Work? Building Vocabulary

AN ANALYTICAL SOLUTION TO QUICK-RESPONSE COLLISION AVOIDANCE MANEUVERS IN LOW EARTH ORBIT

ATTITUDE CONTROL MECHANIZATION TO DE-ORBIT SATELLITES USING SOLAR SAILS

CHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE

Toshinori Kuwahara*, Yoshihiro Tomioka, Yuta Tanabe, Masato Fukuyama, Yuji Sakamoto, Kazuya Yoshida, Tohoku University, Japan

CHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE

Parametric Design MARYLAND. The Design Process Level I Design Example: Low-Cost Lunar Exploration U N I V E R S I T Y O F

Constraint Based Control Method For Precision Formation Flight of Spacecraft AAS

Interplanetary Spacecraft. Team 12. Alliance: Foxtrot

AA 528 Spacecraft Dynamics and Control. Mehran Mesbahi Aeronautics & Astronautics Winter 2017 University of Washington

Searching for less perturbed elliptical orbits around Europa

FORMATION FLYING WITH SHEPHERD SATELLITES NIAC Fellows Meeting Michael LaPointe Ohio Aerospace Institute

Physics 218: Midterm#1

IAC-16.A Jason A. Reiter a *, David B. Spencer b

LABORATORY II DESCRIPTION OF MOTION IN TWO DIMENSIONS

PAER - Tarleton State University

Chapter 6 More complicated orbits and spacecraft trajectories

Circular Motion & Gravitation FR Practice Problems

LABORATORY V PREDICTING NON-REPETITIVE MOTION

To the Moon and Back

Mission to Mars. MAE 598: Design Optimization Final Project. By: Trevor Slawson, Jenna Lynch, Adrian Maranon, and Matt Catlett

LABORATORY V CONSERVATION OF MOMENTUM

Science in the news Voyager s 11 billion mile journey

LUMINARY Memo #214 Revision 1

experiment3 Introduction to Data Analysis

Case Studies for Uncertainty Quantification of a High-fidelity Spacecraft Oriented Break-up Tool. Bent Fritsche, HTG Stijn Lemmens, ESA

Overview of China Chang'e-3 Mission and Development of Follow-on Mission

[04] Seasons, Phases, and Eclipses (9/7/17)

ENAE 483/788D MIDTERM FALL, 2018 NAME: a 3 = a = 42970] 1. So after one sol, the subspacecraft point would have gone 88773

Marlene H. Dortch Secretary, Federal Communications Commission th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C

Numerical Techniques for Computing Orbits

Design of Orbits and Spacecraft Systems Engineering. Scott Schoneman 13 November 03

ASE 366K Spacecraft Dynamics

Transcription:

The Kerbal Space Program Fall 2013 Phy 223- Semester Project Documentation due Monday November, 25 11:59PM Introduction The goal of this project is to begin a space program on the planet Kerbin. Luckily, there is software available to help you with this task, aptly named Kerbal Space Program (KSP). You will find this software at kerbalspaceprogram.com. Since you are only starting the space program, and therefore your primary goals are relatively modest, you will only need the demo version of the software. Download and install it. Goals Your objective is to build and launch a spacecraft that is capable of reaching orbit and returning to the planet Kerbin. Specifically, your spacecraft must: 1. Obtain an approximately circular orbit at 100 km. 2. Once a circular orbit has been achieved, perform a maneuver that puts the spacecraft in a circular orbit with an apoapsis of 350km. 3. Deorbit and land safely. Your budget for this mission is 25000 Kerbin dollars. Note that while it is a good idea to try and land as close as possible to the Kerbal Space Center and that a water landing is acceptable, a safe landing anywhere on Kerbin is the only mandatory goal of this phase of the mission. In order to achieve these goals, you need to learn how to build, launch, and maneuver a spacecraft within the program. Additionally, you will need to learn a little bit about orbital mechanics. These tasks are left up to you to perform individually, as there are many resources available online that will provide you with guidance. In order to provide proof of the success of your space program, you will document your efforts. Documentation At the completion of your project you will create a brief report summarizing your space program. This will include a detailed budget of your spacecraft that includes a chart itemizing the 1

components that you used and their associated cost. You should list the components of your spacecraft and that reason that you have selected them. You will describe the steps that you took to achieve the goals outlined above. This description does not have to be a list of steps that you took within the program, but rather a short summary of the maneuvers that you performed and the rationale behind them. For example, Launch: the spacecraft was launched using full throttle with a heading directly overhead until you reached an altitude of 10000 m, etc. Each stage of the mission should have, at minimum, a few sentences describing the stage. At the very least, you should summarize: the launch, orbit insertion at 100km, transfer to 350km orbit, deorbit, and landing. In addition to a written summary of the flight, you should provide images showing your spacecraft at each stage of the mission. The easiest way to do this is by taking screen shots of the spacecraft and the map. You should include images of: the spacecraft in the vehicle assembly building, the spacecraft on the launch pad, the map when the spacecraft is at an orbit of approximately 100 km (see Figure 1), the map when the spacecraft is in an orbit of approximately 350 km, the spacecraft at an orbit of 350 km (see Figure 2) the spacecraft after it has landed. Note that on the map images, the spacecraft name ( simple ), the altitude of the orbit and the orbit prediction itself is shown. Your images should be similar. This part of your documentation, not including figures should be no more than 1.5 pages in length. If you cannot complete one or more of the primary goals, you should document those that you could complete and those that you could not. 2

Figure 1: A view of the Kerbin Space Program spacecraft s orbit 350 km. Figure 2: A view of the Kerbin Space Program spacecraft in orbit at 350 km. 3

The Physics of Space Flight In addition to the documentation described above, you must also answer the following questions (page limit = 2): 1. When building your spacecraft, there are 3 different liquid fuel engines to choose from. What must you consider when selecting which engine(s) to use and why? 2. Each of engines has a value for Isp, or specific impulse. What is this and why is it important? 3. In the vehicle assembly building, there are buttons that allow you to view the center of mass and the center of thrust of the spacecraft. What are these things and why is their relationship important? 4. How do the effects of steering your spacecraft east a few moments after launch differ from steering your spacecraft west (or any other direction)? 5. What is the difference between a spacecraft s apoapsis and periapsis? 6. When setting up a maneuver in KSP using a maneuver node, you will notice that 3 new values appear next to the NavBall. One of those values is the V, or Delta V, required to complete the maneuver. What does this mean and why is it important? 7. In order to increase the altitude of an orbit, is it more efficient to use a prograde burn or a radial burn? Explain why. 8. Once in orbit, how can you change the orbital inclination? 9. What steps would be required to get your spacecraft into a Sun Synchronous Orbit for a short amount of time (don t worry about achieving an orbit that has the correct precession rate required to actually stay in such an orbit for an extended time period)? 10. When doing a deorbital maneuver, why does the orbit prediction in KSP always over predict your landing (i.e. predict your landing to be further from your current position than it will be)? Determining Success This project will be evaluated using a 100 point scale. Table 1 summarizes the evaluation criteria and the maximum score for each component of the project. You will receive full credit for completing each mission element. No partial points will be awarded. Your mission summary should be concise and to the point and written in a technical manner. Full credit will be awarded if you adequately describe all mission elements and the important maneuvers taken during them. Answers to the physics questions should also be technical. Important equations should be written and discussed where appropriate. Specific physics concepts should be used in the answers to most, if not all, questions. Full credit will be awarded for correct, physically sound, answers. 4

Roughly half credit will be awarded for correct answers that lack discussion of the physics taking place. It is expected that your document be well organized, readable, and contain no grammatical or spelling errors. Points will be deduced from the organization and quality metric for each error found. Project Component Mission Success: Maximum Points Launch 5 100 km orbit achieved 15 350 km orbit achieved 5 Deorbit 5 Safe landing 5 Mission Summary: 25 Physics of space flight 25 questions: Organization and quality of 15 documentation: Table 1: Summary of evaluation criteria Submission of your project report should be done via email to dpawlows@emich.edu Extra Credit If you are able to successfully complete the mission outlined above, you may try to accomplish a more advanced mission: orbiting Mün. You may build a new spacecraft and use any components that you wish, with any budget necessary to accomplish this mission. If you are able to adequately document your success, you can earn 20 extra credit points. 5