INTER-AGENCY SPACE DEBRIS COORDINATION COMMITTEE (IADC) SPACE DEBRIS ISSUES IN THE GEOSTATIONARY ORBIT AND THE GEOSTATIONARY TRANSFER ORBITS

Similar documents
End of Life Re-orbiting The Meteosat-5 Experience

Prof. Richard Crowther Chief Engineer, UK Space Agency. Reflections on Orbital Debris Mitigation Measures

Eutelsat practice & views on long term sustainability. COPUOS/SCST - LTS Workshop Vienna, 14 February 2013

USA Space Debris Environment, Operations, and Modeling Updates

RECENT SPACE DEBRIS MITIGATION ACTIVITIES IN FRANCE F.ALBY

FEDERAL SPACE AGENCY OF RUSSIA ACTIVITY OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON SPACE DEBRIS PROBLEM

USA Space Debris Environment and Operational Updates

The Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee (IADC)

The use of ASPOS OKP System in the interests of ensuring the safety of space operations and increasing awareness about the situation in high orbits

The Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee (IADC)

The Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee (IADC)

EUROSTAR 3000 INCLINED ORBIT MISSION : LIFETIME OPTIMISATION IN CASE OF INJECTION WITH A LOW INCLINATION

USA Space Debris Environment, Operations, and Policy Updates

Space Debris Activities in India

STUDY THE SPACE DEBRIS IMPACT IN THE EARLY STAGES OF THE NANO-SATELLITE DESIGN

EFFECTIVENESS OF THE DE-ORBITING PRACTICES IN THE MEO REGION

COLLISION RISK ASSESSMENT AND MITIGATION STRATEGY FOR THE GSOC GEO SATELLITES

DE-ORBITATION STUDIES AND OPERATIONS FOR SPIRALE GTO SATELLITES

CHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE

1. (a) Describe the difference between over-expanded, under-expanded and ideallyexpanded

Orbit Design Marcelo Suárez. 6th Science Meeting; Seattle, WA, USA July 2010

OVERVIEW ON 2012 SPACE DEBRIS ACTIVITIES IN FRANCE

CHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE

Space Systems Space Debris Mitigation

ACTIVITY OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON SPACE DEBRIS PROBLEM

Satellite Orbital Maneuvers and Transfers. Dr Ugur GUVEN

OVERVIEW ON 2012 SPACE DEBRIS ACTIVITIES IN FRANCE

Orbital Debris Observation via Laser Illuminated Optical Measurement Techniques

IMPACT OF SPACE DEBRIS MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS ON THE MISSION DESIGN OF ESA SPACECRAFT

Swiss Contributions to a Better Understanding of the Space Debris Environment

CHALLENGES RELATED TO DISCOVERY, FOLLOW-UP, AND STUDY OF SMALL HIGH AREA-TO-MASS RATIO OBJECTS AT GEO

IADC Re-Entry Prediction Campaigns

GEO protected region: ISON capabilities to provide informational support for tasks of spacecraft flight safety and space debris removal

Eutelsat practice & views on long term sustainability of space activities

An Optical Survey for Space Debris on Highly Eccentric MEO Orbits

SPACE SITUATIONAL AWARENESS AND SPACE DEBRIS ACTIVITIES IN INDIA

LAUNCHES AND LAUNCH VEHICLES. Dr. Marwah Ahmed

CHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE

The Characteristics and Consequences of the Break-up of the Fengyun-1C Spacecraft

TUNDRA DISPOSAL ORBIT STUDY

The Launch of Gorizont 45 on the First Proton K /Breeze M

Exhaustive strategy for optical survey of geosynchronous region using TAROT telescopes

Major fragmentation of Atlas 5 Centaur upper stage B (SSN #40209)

Space Debris Mitigation Activities at ESA

Statistical methods to address the compliance of GTO with the French Space Operations Act

Implementation of the Outer Space Treaties in view of Small Satellites

RAPID GEOSYNCHRONOUS TRANSFER ORBIT ASCENT PLAN GENERATION. Daniel X. Junker (1) Phone: ,

Orbital Debris Challenges for Space Operations J.-C. Liou, PhD NASA Chief Scientist for Orbital Debris

Proton Launch System Mission Planner s Guide APPENDIX F. Proton Launch System Options and Enhancements

Marlene H. Dortch Secretary, Federal Communications Commission th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C

MAE 180A: Spacecraft Guidance I, Summer 2009 Homework 4 Due Thursday, July 30.

General Assembly. United Nations A/AC.105/951

Analytical Method for Space Debris propagation under perturbations in the geostationary ring

Creating Satellite Orbits

ORBITAL DECAY PREDICTION AND SPACE DEBRIS IMPACT ON NANO-SATELLITES

Sirius talks Space economy: urgent need for new global regulation? Space Policy

Support to the IADC Space Debris Mitigation Guidelines

NASA TECHNICAL STANDARD. Process for Limiting Orbital Debris. Measurement System Identification: Metric

3. The process of orbit determination and improvement

Contribution of ISON and KIAM space debris. space

Space Debris Assessment for USA-193

PROPERTIES OF THE HIGH AREA-TO-MASS RATIO SPACE DEBRIS POPULATION IN GEO

Orbital Debris Mitigation

Space Debris Mitigation Activities at ESA in 2013

RISK INDUCED BY THE UNCATALOGUED SPACE DEBRIS POPULATION IN THE PRESENCE OF LARGE CONSTELLATIONS

The Orbit Control of ERS-1 and ERS-2 for a Very Accurate Tandem Configuration

Toshinori Kuwahara*, Yoshihiro Tomioka, Yuta Tanabe, Masato Fukuyama, Yuji Sakamoto, Kazuya Yoshida, Tohoku University, Japan

DEBRIS IMPACT ON LOW EARTH ORBIT SPACE MISSION

Asia-Pacific ground-base Optical Satellite Observation System APOSOS

on space debris objects obtained by the

Information furnished in conformity with the Convention on Registration of Objects Launched into Outer Space

ERS-2 and ENVISAT orbit control Current and future strategy The impact on the interferometric baseline

Spacecraft design indicator for space debris

CONCLUSIONS FROM ESA SPACE DEBRIS TELESCOPE OBSERVATIONS ON SPACE DEBRIS ENVIRONMENT MODELLING

Orbits for Polar Applications Malcolm Macdonald

SPACE DEBRIS REMOVAL

SLR-based orbit determination and orbit prediction of space debris objects

COUPLED OPTIMIZATION OF LAUNCHER AND ALL-ELECTRIC SATELLITE TRAJECTORIES

Negating the Yearly Eccentricity Magnitude Variation of Super-synchronous Disposal Orbits due to Solar Radiation Pressure

Modeling of the Orbital Debris Environment Risks in the Past, Present, and Future

HYPER Industrial Feasibility Study Final Presentation Orbit Selection

ESA s Annual Space Environment Report

Design of Orbits and Spacecraft Systems Engineering. Scott Schoneman 13 November 03

A MISSION TO DEMONSTRATE THE PRESERVATION OF THE GEOSTATIONARY ORBIT

Launch strategy for Indian lunar mission and precision injection to the Moon using genetic algorithm

CONSIDERATION OF SPACE DEBRIS ISSUES IN EARLY SPACECRAFT DESIGN PHASES

Space Environment & Technology Space Policy and Law Course 2018

Usage of IGS TEC Maps to explain RF Link Degradations by Spread-F, observed on Cluster and other ESA Spacecraft

COMPARISON OF ANGLES ONLY INITIAL ORBIT DETERMINATION ALGORITHMS FOR SPACE DEBRIS CATALOGUING

Solid Propellant Autonomous DE-Orbit System [SPADES]

Experimental Analysis of Low Earth Orbit Satellites due to Atmospheric Perturbations

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF A SPACE VEHICLE FOR ORBITAL DEBRIS PROTECTION

Accepted Manuscript. Stephen Hobbs. S (10) /j.asr Reference: JASR 10051

OptElec: an Optimisation Software for Low-Thrust Orbit Transfer Including Satellite and Operation Constraints

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S * Terms and definitions relating to space radiocommunications

MAE 180A: Spacecraft Guidance I, Summer 2009 Homework 2 Due Tuesday, July 14, in class.

Proton Launch System Mission Planner s Guide SECTION 2. LV Performance

Passive Orbital Debris Removal Using Special Density Materials

Improvement of Orbits of Geostationary Satellites from Observations Over a Time Interval of Days

MULTI PURPOSE MISSION ANALYSIS DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK MUPUMA

Transcription:

INTER-AGENCY SPACE DEBRIS COORDINATION COMMITTEE (IADC) SPACE DEBRIS ISSUES IN THE GEOSTATIONARY ORBIT AND THE GEOSTATIONARY TRANSFER ORBITS Presented to: 37-th Session of the SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL SUBCOMMITTEE COMMITTEE ON THE PEACEFUL USES OF OUTER SPACE UNITED NATIONS Page 1

OVERVIEW OF PRESENTATION - THE GEOSTATIONARY TRANSFER ORBITS - THE CURRENT POPULATION IN GEO - THE IADC GEO OBSERVATION CAMPAIGN - THE RECOMMENDATION OF IADC FOR THE DISPOSITION OF GEOSTATIONARY SATELLITES AT END-OF-LIFE Page 2

THE GEOSTATIONARY TRANSFER ORBIT (GTO) - Purpose: transfer orbit to geostationary orbit - Typical parameters: - perigee altitude from about 200 km to several thousand km's - apogee at or above the geostationary altitude (35786 km) at low latitude - apsidal line close to equatorial plane - inclination close to latitude of launch site (0-10 deg; 26-30 deg; 48-50 deg) - majority of objects in GTO are upper stages and mission-related objects Page 3

Lat 30 Lon 40 Height 48000 Page 4

Lat 0 Lon 100 Height 48000 Page 5

Lat 89.999 Lon 10 Height 100,000 Page 6

- Two transfer modes: GTO (2) - mode 1: - launcher delivers S/C in GTO; - S/C reaches with own propulsion near-geo orbit - super-synchronous transfer may be of interest I in some cases - final upper stage remains in GTO - mode 2: - launcher delivers S/C in a near-geo orbit; - final upper stage remains in GEO space Page 7

GTO (3) - Orbital lifetime of objects in GTO depends strongly on perigee altitude and orientation of orbit with respect to Sun and Moon - GTO objects may pass for extended periods through LEO and GEO space - Relative velocity with respect to GEO: 1.5-2 km/s - Relative velocity with respect to LEO: 3-18 km/s Page 8

SATELLITES IN THE GEOSTATIONARY ORBIT - Satellites are assigned nominal longitude and longitude window - Typical size of longitude window is 0.2 deg - Because of orbital perturbations station-keeping is required - control of longitude & latitude (E/W & N/S) - control of longitude only (E/W) - Capacity increase by allocating several spacecraft to the same longitude window (co-location), e.g. 8 ASTRA S/C at 12 deg. E - Collisions among S/C in same longitude window are avoided by using slightly different orbits (eccentricity, inclination) - Special operation measures needed to avoid collisions (more precise orbit determination and control) Page 9

THE GEOSTATIONARY RING Comprises all geostationary orbits Comprises the space of the operational geostationary satellites Radial dimension 35786 km +- 75 km N-S dimension (geocentric) +- 15 deg Page 10

- About 800 catalogued objects THE CURRENT POPULATION IN GEO - About 230-250 spacecraft are controlled - Two breakups are known in GEO: Ekran S/C and Titan upper stage. Fragments are not cataloged. - Tracking capabilities of routine space surveillance: 1 meter - Experimental campaigns by ESA, NASA and CNES searching for debris show a significant population of unknown objects in the size region 20 cm - 100 cm - Information on micro-debris and meteoroids is obtained with dust detectors (e.g. GORID on Express-2) Page 11

THE IADC GEO OBSERVATION CAMPAIGN - General objective: Determine the extent and character of debris in the geosynchronous region. - Specific objective: characterise uncatalogued objects in GEO region as to - brightness - inclination - RA of ascending node - mean motion - Progress hampered due to lack of suitable optical facilities (min. aperture of about 1 meter desirable) Page 12

COLLISION RISKS IN GEO - among controlled spacecraft: very small collision risk except for colocated spacecraft - operational S/C are at risk by uncontrolled S/C (maximum impact velocity 800 m/s) - operational S/C are at risk by objects in GTO (maximum impact velocity approximately 2 km/s) Page 13

A STRATEGY FOR GEO DISPOSAL - The objective is to protect the geostationary ring for future operations. The strategy for control is to manage the disposition of the kinetic and chemically stored energy to preclude hazards to current and future operational spacecraft. - The kinetic energy of the S/C or rocket body cannot be eliminated but the S/C or rocket body can be displaced to a region of reduced spatial density and therefore one in which the risk of collision is minimized. Page 14

A STRATEGY FOR GEO DISPOSAL (2) - The manoeuvre to reorbit the S/C at end-of-life is an efficient and effective method of disposing of residual propellant and pressurants. - To preclude inadvertent increase in the energy of a GEO crossing, the reorbiting manoeuvre should be planned and executed as a multi-burn series of manoeuvres. - The residual energy should be used to maximize the displacement from the GEO ring - Depletion of other forms of stored energy is required to preclude cross contamination from the disposal region to GEO (e.g. battery explosion). Page 15

A STRATEGY FOR GEO DISPOSAL (3) - These measures will not guarantee the indefinite availability of GEO current levels of environmental risk but they will maximize the future expectation at reasonable cost. Page 16

RECOMMENDATION ON DEBRIS MANAGEMENT IN THE GEOSTATIONARY RING Considering the importance of the Geostationary Ring (GEO) for space applications and the long-term consequences of any action taken at end of mission to dispose of spacecraft in the GEO region, the Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee (IADC) recommends that: - The IADC endorses the ITU Recommendation ITU-RS. 1003 June 1993 that at end of mission S/C be reorbited into a disposal orbit above the geostationary ring. - The IADC recommends that in so far as possible, operational debris not be inserted into GEO. Page 17

RECOMMENDATION ON DEBRIS MANAGEMENT IN THE GEOSTATIONARY RING (2) - The IADC recommends that at end-of-life satellites in GEO be reorbited and passivated. The reorbiting manoeuvre displaces the satellite to a region above GEO to reduce the spatial density; the passivation in disposal region reduces the threat of cross contamination of the region by inadvertent explosions. - The minimum perigee altitude above the geostationary altitude of 35786 km should be not less than min H (in km): min H = 235 km + Cr x 1000 x A/m Cr is a coefficient between 0 and 2. A is the cross-sectional area (m**2) and m the S/C mass (kg) Page 18

RECOMMENDATION ON DEBRIS MANAGEMENT IN THE GEOSTATIONARY RING (3) - There is no reason to circularize the orbit at a particular altitude since altitude variations reduce the spatial density, which is desirable. - The manoeuvre to achieve the increased perigee should be executed as a multi-burn series of manoeuvres in order to minimize the probability that errors of estimate in the residual propellant will leave the S/C in a GEO crossing orbit. - The IADC recommends that when relocated to the supersynchronous disposal region, the S/C should be depleted of all other sources of stored energy, pressurant gases, battery energy, etc. in order that inadvertent explosions can be avoided and debris be ejected back into GEO. RECOMMENDATION ON DEBRIS MANAGEMENT IN Page 19

THE GEOSTATIONARY RING (4) - The IADC recommends that rocket upper stages used for inserting geostationary satellites into GEO are placed in a disposal region with a perigee located at least min H above the geostationary altitude. Page 20

IADC ISSUES - Oct. 11-13, 1999: 17-th IADC at ESOC, Darmstadt (Germany) with more than 100 participants - National Space Agency of the Ukraine (NSAU) applies for membership in IADC - Feb. 16, 2000: IADC Steering Group Meeting - June 13-16, 2000: 18-th IADC at Colorado Springs (U.S.A.) Page 21