Stopover Models. Rachel McCrea. BES/DICE Workshop, Canterbury Collaborative work with

Similar documents
Introduction to capture-markrecapture

Cormack-Jolly-Seber Models

ECOLOGICAL STATISTICS: Analysis of Capture-Recapture Data

Webinar Session 1. Introduction to Modern Methods for Analyzing Capture- Recapture Data: Closed Populations 1

Input from capture mark recapture methods to the understanding of population biology

Edinburgh Research Explorer

Mark-Recapture. Mark-Recapture. Useful in estimating: Lincoln-Petersen Estimate. Lincoln-Petersen Estimate. Lincoln-Petersen Estimate

CHAPTER 12. Jolly-Seber models in MARK Protocol. Carl James Schwarz, Simon Fraser University A. Neil Arnason, University of Manitoba

Parameter Redundancy with Applications in Statistical Ecology

Jolly-Seber models in MARK

THE JOLLY-SEBER MODEL AND MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION REVISITED. Walter K. Kremers. Biometrics Unit, Cornell, Ithaca, New York ABSTRACT

GOODNESS OF FIT TESTS FOR OPEN CAPTURE-RECAPTURE MODELS

7.2 EXPLORING ECOLOGICAL RELATIONSHIPS IN SURVIVAL AND ESTIMATING RATES OF POPULATION CHANGE USING PROGRAM MARK

Capture-Recapture Analyses of the Frog Leiopelma pakeka on Motuara Island

Four aspects of a sampling strategy necessary to make accurate and precise inferences about populations are:

FW Laboratory Exercise. Program MARK with Mark-Recapture Data

Lecture 7 Models for open populations: Tag recovery and CJS models, Goodness-of-fit

FW Laboratory Exercise. Program MARK: Joint Live Recapture and Dead Recovery Data and Pradel Model

Continuous Covariates in Mark-Recapture-Recovery Analysis: A Comparison. of Methods

Integrating mark-resight, count, and photograph data to more effectively monitor non-breeding American oystercatcher populations

Mark-recapture with identification errors

Estimating demographic parameters for capture recapture data in the presence of multiple mark types

Ecological applications of hidden Markov models and related doubly stochastic processes

Maximum likelihood estimation of mark-recapture-recovery models in the presence of continuous covariates

Barn swallow post-fledging survival: Using Stan to fit a hierarchical ecological model. Fränzi Korner-Nievergelt Beat Naef-Daenzer Martin U.

Using POPAN-5 to Analyse Banding Data.

Improving the Computational Efficiency in Bayesian Fitting of Cormack-Jolly-Seber Models with Individual, Continuous, Time-Varying Covariates

Levels of Ecological Organization. Biotic and Abiotic Factors. Studying Ecology. Chapter 4 Population Ecology

Chapter 4 Population Ecology

CHAPTER 15. The robust design Decomposing the probability of subsequent encounter

An Extension of the Cormack Jolly Seber Model for Continuous Covariates with Application to Microtus pennsylvanicus

EMBEDDING POPULATION DYNAMICS IN MARK-RECAPTURE MODELS. Jonathan R. B. Bishop

Closed population capture-recapture models

Review Article Putting Markov Chains Back into Markov Chain Monte Carlo

Parameter redundancy in mark-recovery models

Unit 1 Lesson 3 Population Dynamics. Copyright Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company

CHAPTER 20. Density estimation... Jake Ivan, Colorado Parks and Wildlife

A new method for analysing discrete life history data with missing covariate values

Continuous, Individual, Time-Dependent Covariates in the Cormack-Jolly-Seber Model

Stat 534 Philip Dixon Fall References: Estimating Population Parameters: Closed and Open populations

Estimating rates of local extinction and colonization in colonial species and an extension to the metapopulation and community levels

Online appendix 1: Detailed statistical tests referred to in Wild goose dilemmas by Black, Prop & Larsson

Occupancy models. Gurutzeta Guillera-Arroita University of Kent, UK National Centre for Statistical Ecology

Estimating abundance of an open population with an N-mixture model using auxiliary data on animal movements

CIMAT Taller de Modelos de Capture y Recaptura Known Fate Survival Analysis

Separating Components of the Detection Process With Combined Methods: An Example With Northern Bobwhite

Mark resight in secr 3.1 Murray Efford

arxiv: v3 [stat.me] 29 Nov 2013

State-space modelling of data on marked individuals

Finite mixture models in secr 3.0 Murray Efford

Capture-Recapture and Removal Methods for Sampling Closed Populations

The Living World Continued: Populations and Communities

Journal of Statistical Software

The probability of successfully making the. Estimating transition probabilities in unmarked populations - entropy revisited

Simon J. Bonner Department of Statistics University of Kentucky

Estimation of sex-specific survival with uncertainty in sex assessment

Ollizlet Population Ecology Chapter 4

REGRESSION WITH CORRELATED ERRORS C.A. GLASBEY

Large scale wildlife monitoring studies: statistical methods for design and analysis

Continuous, Individual, Time-Dependent Covariates in the Cormack-Jolly-Seber Model

CHAPTER. Population Ecology

Joint live encounter & dead recovery data

Ch 5. Evolution, Biodiversity, and Population Ecology. Part 1: Foundations of Environmental Science

Using POPAN-5 to analyse banding data

A population is a group of individuals of the same species, living in a shared space at a specific point in time.

A tip of the iceberg? The probability of catching cartels

Population Abundance Estimation With Heterogeneous Encounter Probabilities Using Numerical Integration

A population is a group of individuals of the same species occupying a particular area at the same time

A hierarchical Bayesian approach to multi-state. mark recapture: simulations and applications

REVISION: POPULATION ECOLOGY 01 OCTOBER 2014

Estimating abundance of unmarked animal populations: accounting for imperfect detection and other sources of zero inflation

Estimation of Lifetime Reproductive Success when reproductive status cannot always be assessed

Models for Estimating Abundance from Repeated Counts of an Open Metapopulation

Log-linear multidimensional Rasch model for capture-recapture

Graphing Equations Chapter Test

Manuscript: Changes in Latitudinal Diversity Gradient during the Great. Björn Kröger, Finnish Museum of Natural History, PO Box 44, Fi Helsinki,

Markov Chains. X(t) is a Markov Process if, for arbitrary times t 1 < t 2 <... < t k < t k+1. If X(t) is discrete-valued. If X(t) is continuous-valued

Approach to Field Research Data Generation and Field Logistics Part 1. Road Map 8/26/2016

Population Ecology. Study of populations in relation to the environment. Increase population size= endangered species

Modelling Complex Queuing Situations with Markov Processes

Lecture 09 - Patch Occupancy and Patch Dynamics

Comparing estimates of population change from occupancy and mark recapture models for a territorial species

Lectures on Probability and Statistical Models

Exercises in Occupancy Estimation and Modeling; Donovan and Hines 2007 EXERCISE 7: ROYLE-NICHOLS ABUNDANCE INDUCED HETEROGENEITY

Optimal Translocation Strategies for Threatened Species

Ecology is studied at several levels

STAT 380 Continuous Time Markov Chains

Canonical Correlation Analysis of Longitudinal Data

BIOL 217 ESTIMATING ABUNDANCE Page 1 of 10

ESTIMATING POPULATION SIZE FROM DNA-BASED CLOSED CAPTURE RECAPTURE DATA INCORPORATING GENOTYPING ERROR

Population Questions. 1. Which of the following conditions is most likely to lead to an increase in a field mouse population?

Ch. 4 - Population Ecology

Unit 6 Populations Dynamics

Fire frequency in the Western Cape

Bayesian Capture-Recapture Analysis and Model Selection Allowing for Heterogeneity and Behavioral Effects

Spatially explicit maximum likelihood methods for capture recapture studies

Occupancy models. Gurutzeta Guillera-Arroita University of Kent, UK National Centre for Statistical Ecology

Route choice models: Introduction and recent developments

Science, statistics and surveys: a herpetological perspective

Analysis of 2005 and 2006 Wolverine DNA Mark-Recapture Sampling at Daring Lake, Ekati, Diavik, and Kennady Lake, Northwest Territories

Transcription:

BES/DICE Workshop, Canterbury 2014 Stopover Models Rachel McCrea Collaborative work with Hannah Worthington, Ruth King, Eleni Matechou Richard Griffiths and Thomas Bregnballe

Overview Capture-recapture data Stopover models Software References Closed population models Open population models Application 1: Great cormorants Application 2: Great crested newts Extensions and Current Work

Capture-recapture data Capture-recapture data 10010 11011 00101 Data from marked animals Population size

Closed population models Closed population: no immigration, emigration, death or births during the study p t: probability an individual is captured at occasion t Capture-recapture data and probabilities 10010 p 1 (1-p 2 )(1-p 3 )p 4 (1-p 5 ) 11011 p 1 p 2 (1-p 3 )p 4 p 5 00101 (1-p 1 )(1-p 2 )p 3 (1-p 4 )p 5

Closed population models Some individuals will not be captured at all during the study The encounter history for these individuals is given by 00000 (1-p 1 )(1-p 2 )(1-p 3 )(1-p 4 )(1-p 5 ) It is the number of individuals who are never captured that we need to estimate to estimate in order to estimate the total population size.

Closed population models Form a likelihood function as L D N! N D! Pr h i i=1 Pr (h 0 ) N D h i: observed encounter history for individual i h 0: encounter history of never captured N: population size D: observed number of individuals Maximise L, to obtain maximum-likelihood estimates of p t and N

Open population models Studied population might not be closed, but still want to be able to estimate population size Jolly-Seber model POPAN/Schwarz-Arnason formulation 0 0 1 0 0 Entry time into the study population

Open population models Studied population might not be closed, but still want to be able to estimate population size Jolly-Seber model POPAN/Schwarz-Arnason formulation 0 0 1 0 0 Entry time into the study population

Open population models Studied population might not be closed, but still want to be able to estimate population size Jolly-Seber model POPAN/Schwarz-Arnason formulation 0 0 1 0 0 Entry time into the study population

Open population models Studied population might not be closed, but still want to be able to estimate population size Jolly-Seber model POPAN/Schwarz-Arnason formulation 0 0 1 0 0 Departure time out of the study population

Open population models Studied population might not be closed, but still want to be able to estimate population size Jolly-Seber model POPAN/Schwarz-Arnason formulation 0 0 1 0 0 Departure time out of the study population

Open population models Studied population might not be closed, but still want to be able to estimate population size Jolly-Seber model POPAN/Schwarz-Arnason formulation 0 0 1 0 0 Departure time out of the study population

Open population models If you assume the population is closed when it is not, the parameter estimates will be biased. Parameters for the Jolly-Seber model N: population size β t : proportion of individuals first available for capture at occasion t+1, T 1 j=0 β j p t : probability an individual is captured at occasion t φ t : probability an individual present in the study area at occasion t remains in the study area until occasion t+1

Open population models When forming the probability of an observed encounter history we need to sum over possible entry and departure times. Suppose individual is first captured at occasion f i and last captured at occasion l i x ij =1 if individual i is captured at occasion j, x ij =0 otherwise f i T d 1 d Pr h i = β b 1 φ j 1 φ d x p j ii (1 p j ) 1 x ii b=1 d=l i j=b j=b

Open population models Corresponding probability of an individual not captured during the study T T d 1 d Pr h 0 = β b 1 φ j b=1 d=1 j=b 1 φ d 1 p j j=b L D N! N D! Pr h i i=1 Pr (h 0 ) N D

Stopover models Generalised version of the Jolly-Seber model Parameters are defined to be age-dependent age corresponds to the time spent in the study area arrival times and departure times are not independent 0 0 1 0 0 a

Stopover models Parameters N: population size; this represents the total number of individuals who have been available for capture on at least one occasion β t : proportion of individuals first available for capture at occasion t+1, T 1 j=0 β j =1 p t (a): probability an individual which entered the study a occasions previously is captured at occasion t φ t (a): probability an individual present in the study area at occasion t, which entered the study a occasions previously, remains in the study area until occasion t+1.

Stopover models L D N! N D! Pr h i i=1 Pr (h 0 ) N D Pr (h 0 ) Pr (h i )

Application 1: Great cormorants Phalacrocorax carbo sinensis Colony Vorsø Daily visits are made to the cormorant colonies during the breeding season, data summarised as monthly captures Records are made of whether or not the cormorants successfully breed

Application 1: Great cormorants 318 individuals 9 occasions monthly February-October

Application 1: Great cormorants Model AIC AIC np MLE of (N-D) N,β(t),φ(.),p(.) 1459.38 332.32 6 11.6 N,β(t),φ(t),p(.) 1127.97 0.91 14 1.8 N,β(t),φ(a),p(.) 1156.24 29.18 14 1.2 N,β(t),φ(a+t),p(.) 1127.06 0.00 22 1.4 1 0.9 0.8 Retention probability 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 Month

Application 2: Great crested newts Triturus cristatus Field study site at the University of Kent Data collected by Professor Richard Griffiths, Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology Data collected weekly during breeding season (February June)

Application 2: Great crested newts week week week week week week week week week week week week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Jake 1 Phillip 1 1 1 1 Oliver 1 1 Jennifer 1 1 1 1 1 Woody 1 1 Antonio 1 1 Daniel 1 Terri 1 1 1 1 1 1 Pierce 1 1 1 1 1 Norman 1 Edith 1 1 1 1 1 Richard 1 1 1 1 1 1 David 1 1 1 2013 data 53 individuals 24 weeks

Application 2: Great crested newts

Application 2: Great crested newts Model AIC AIC np MLE of (N-D) N,β(t),φ(.),p(.) 687.29 107.82 14 11.0 N,β(t),φ(lt),p(.) 620.72 41.25 15 1.8 N,β(t),φ(t),p(.) 648.72 69.25 37 1.9 N,β(t),φ(a),p(.) 681.53 102.06 37 0.3 N,β(t),φ(la),p(.) 647.26 67.80 15 1.5 N,β(t),φ(la),p(t) 585.24 5.77 38 1.3 N,β(t),φ(lt),p(t) 579.47 0.00 38 1.3 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 retention probability, phi(lt) capture probability, p(t) 0 0 5 10 15 20 25

Extensions and Current Research Integrating capture-recapture-resighting data and counts of unmarked birds at stopover sites Matechou et al, (2013a) Estimating age-specific survival when age is unknown: Capture-recapture data (Matechou et al, 2013) Ring-recovery data (McCrea et al, 2013) Integrating multiple years of stopover data Worthington et al, (2014) Multisite developments To keep up to date with current research developments see www.rachelmccrea.co.uk

Software HetAge: Shirley Pledger R code http://homepages.ecs.vuw.ac.nz/~shirley/ R code: Matechou et al, 2013b M ATLAB code www.capturerecapture.co.uk POPAN Jolly-Seber model Program Mark: www.phidot.org

References Matechou, Morgan, Pledger, Collazo and Lyons (2013a) Integrated analysis of capture-recapture-resighting data and counts of unmarked birds at stop-over sites. Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics. 18, 120-135. Matechou (2010) Applications and extensions of capture-recapture stop-over models. PhD Thesis, University of Kent Matechou, Pledger, Efford, Morgan and Thomson (2013b) Estimating age-specific survival when age is unknown: open population capture-recapyture models with age structure and heterogeneity. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 4, 654-664. McCrea and Morgan (2014) Analysis of capture-recapture data. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press. Chapter 8. Pledger, Efford, Pollock, Callazo and Lyons (2009) Stopover duration analysis with departure probability dependent on unknon time since arrival. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 3, 349-363. Schwarz and Arnason (1996) A general methodology for the analysis of capturerecapture experiments in open populations. Biometrics. 52, 860-873. Worthington, King, McCrea and Matechou (2014) An explicit likelihood framework for integrated stopover models. University of Kent Technical Report. UKC/SMSAS/14/002