USER S MANUAL. 1D Seismic Site Response Analysis Example. University of California: San Diego.

Similar documents
USER S MANUAL 1D Seismic Site Response Analysis Example University of California: San Diego August 30, 2017

USER S MANUAL 1D Seismic Site Response Analysis Example University of California: San Diego August 30, 2017

2004 OpenSees User Workshop. OpenSees. Geotechnical Capabilities and Applications. (U.C. San Diego) Roadmap

2005 OpenSees Symposium OpenSees

2D Liquefaction Analysis for Bridge Abutment

EVALUATION OF SITE CHARACTERISTICS IN LIQUEFIABLE SOILS

Dynamic Analysis Contents - 1

Liquefaction - principles

Numerical modeling of liquefaction effects: Development & initial applications of a sand plasticity model

Numerical model comparison on deformation behavior of a TSF embankment subjected to earthquake loading

DYNAMIC RESPONSE APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY

FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF ARKANSAS TEST SERIES PILE #2 USING OPENSEES (WITH LPILE COMPARISON)

Dynamics: Domain Reduction Method. Case study

1 Slope Stability for a Cohesive and Frictional Soil

1D Ground Response Analysis

Analysis of a single pile settlement

Numerical analysis of effect of mitigation measures on seismic performance of a liquefiable tailings dam foundation

Dynamics Manual. Version 7

Site Liquefaction. Stress-Strain Response Stress-Strain Models Site Response Lateral Deformation. Ahmed Elgamal

CHAPTER 6: ASSESSMENT OF A COMPREHENSIVE METHOD FOR PREDICTING PERFORMANCE

Settlement and Bearing Capacity of a Strip Footing. Nonlinear Analyses

2D Embankment and Slope Analysis (Numerical)

1 Slope Stability for a Cohesive and Frictional Soil

CVEEN 7330 Modeling Exercise 2c

Recent Research on EPS Geofoam Seismic Buffers. Richard J. Bathurst and Saman Zarnani GeoEngineering Centre at Queen s-rmc Canada

BENCHMARK LINEAR FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF LATERALLY LOADED SINGLE PILE USING OPENSEES & COMPARISON WITH ANALYTICAL SOLUTION

Tutorial 12 Excess Pore Pressure (B-bar method) Undrained loading (B-bar method) Initial pore pressure Excess pore pressure

Leaf Spring (Material, Contact, geometric nonlinearity)

Site Response Using Effective Stress Analysis

Dynamic Response of EPS Blocks /soil Sandwiched Wall/embankment

Soil Properties - II

PLAXIS LIQUEFACTION MODEL UBC3D-PLM

LIQUEFACTION ASSESSMENT BY THE ENERGY METHOD THROUGH CENTRIFUGE MODELING

Application of cyclic accumulation models for undrained and partially drained general boundary value problems

Advanced Lateral Spread Modeling

1D Nonlinear Numerical Methods

EMEA. Liudmila Feoktistova Engineer Atomenergoproekt

Seismic Analysis of Soil-pile Interaction under Various Soil Conditions

Modified Cam-clay triaxial test simulations

Example Application 12. Embankment Loading on a Cam-Clay Foundation

ANSYS Mechanical Basic Structural Nonlinearities

Verification of the Hyperbolic Soil Model by Triaxial Test Simulations

Advanced model for soft soils. Modified Cam-Clay (MCC)

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF PILES IN SAND BASED ON SOIL-PILE INTERACTION

Finite Deformation Analysis of Dynamic Behavior of Embankment on Liquefiable Sand Deposit Considering Pore Water Flow and Migration

Non-linear and time-dependent material models in Mentat & MARC. Tutorial with Background and Exercises

Determination of Excess Pore Pressure in Earth Dam after Earthquake

Effects of Multi-directional Shaking in Nonlinear Site Response Analysis: Case Study of 2007 Niigata-ken Chuetsu-oki Earthquake

1.8 Unconfined Compression Test

Seismic Stability of Tailings Dams, an Overview

NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF GEO-STRUCTURES IN A LIQUEFACTION REGIME

Unloading-Reloading Rule for Nonlinear Site Response Analysis

Propagation of Seismic Waves through Liquefied Soils

APPENDIX J. Dynamic Response Analysis

Geotechnical Elements and Models in OpenSees

Cyclic lateral response of piles in dry sand: Effect of pile slenderness

VMS-GeoMil. Background

Cyclic Behavior of Sand and Cyclic Triaxial Tests. Hsin-yu Shan Dept. of Civil Engineering National Chiao Tung University

13 Dewatered Construction of a Braced Excavation

Evaluation of dynamic behavior of culverts and embankments through centrifuge model tests and a numerical analysis

13 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August 1-6, 2004 Paper No. 3016

Finite Element Solutions for Geotechnical Engineering

3-D Numerical simulation of shake-table tests on piles subjected to lateral spreading

NUMERICAL MODELING OF LIQUEFACTION-INDUCED LATERAL SPREADING

CAEFEM v9.5 Information

Applicability of Multi-spring Model Based on Finite Strain Theory to Seismic Behavior of Embankment on Liquefiable Sand Deposit

ALASKA ENERGY AUTHORITY AEA ENGINEERING FEASIBILITY REPORT. Appendix B8. Finite Element Analysis

Evaluation of 1-D Non-linear Site Response Analysis using a General Quadratic/Hyperbolic Strength-Controlled Constitutive Model

Dynamic Analysis to Study Soil-Pile Interaction Effects

Finite Element Solutions for Geotechnical Engineering

Dynamic Soil Pressures on Embedded Retaining Walls: Predictive Capacity Under Varying Loading Frequencies

Soil Behaviour in Earthquake Geotechnics

Analysis of the horizontal bearing capacity of a single pile

Seismic Design of a Hydraulic Fill Dam by Nonlinear Time History Method

Finite Element Solutions for Geotechnical Engineering

Investigation of Liquefaction Behaviour for Cohesive Soils

INFLUENCE OF SOIL NONLINEARITY AND LIQUEFACTION ON DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF PILE GROUPS

NUMERICAL STUDY ON LATERAL SPREADING OF LIQUEFIED GROUND BEHIND A SHEET PILE MODEL IN A LARGE SCALE SHAKE TABLE TEST

SOME OBSERVATIONS RELATED TO LIQUEFACTION SUSCEPTIBILITY OF SILTY SOILS

Numerical simulation of inclined piles in liquefiable soils

4 Undrained Cylindrical Cavity Expansion in a Cam-Clay Medium

Technical Specifications

MODELING OF CYCLIC MOBILITY AN ENERGY APPROACH

Numerical Simulation of the Response of Sandy Soils Treated with PV-drains

A Constitutive Framework for the Numerical Analysis of Organic Soils and Directionally Dependent Materials

1D Analysis - Simplified Methods

Spread footing settlement and rotation analysis

Engineeringmanuals. Part2

Dynamic Analyses of an Earthfill Dam on Over-Consolidated Silt with Cyclic Strain Softening

Drained Against Undrained Behaviour of Sand

MODELING OF ELASTO-PLASTIC MATERIALS IN FINITE ELEMENT METHOD

Technical Specifications

APPENDIX I. Deformation Analysis of the Left Abutment

NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF DAMAGE OF RIVER EMBANKMENT ON SOFT SOIL DEPOSIT DUE TO EARTHQUAKES WITH LONG DURATION TIME

Liquefaction: Additional issues. This presentation consists of two parts: Section 1

Tutorial 23 Back Analysis of Material Properties

Numerical Assessment of the Influence of End Conditions on. Constitutive Behavior of Geomaterials

TIME-DEPENDENT BEHAVIOR OF PILE UNDER LATERAL LOAD USING THE BOUNDING SURFACE MODEL

15 Drained and Undrained Triaxial Compression Test on a Cam-Clay Sample

Verification of a Micropile Foundation

Transcription:

USER S MANUAL 1D Seismic Site Response Analysis Example http://www.soilquake.net/ucsdsoilmodels/ University of California: San Diego August 2, 2017

Table of Contents USER'S MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS Page # 1 General Information... 1 1.1. UCSDSAND3 Material Model... 1 1.2. UCSDCLAY Material Model... 1 2 Installation... 3 2.1. FLAC... 3 2.2. LS-DYNA... 4 2.3. DIANA... 4 2.4. Abaqus... 4 3 Input... 6 3.1. Program... 6 3.2. Input File... 6 3.3. Water Table... 6 3.4. Rayleigh Damping... 6 3.5. Analysis Parameter... 7 3.6. Input Motion... 7 3.7. Soil Properties... 7 4 Using the Excel Sheet... 9 4.1. FLAC... 9 4.2. LS-DYNA... 11 4.3. DIANA... 11 4.4. Abaqus... 12

General Information 1 GENERAL INFORMATION The UCSD soil models UCSDSAND3 and UCSDCLAY are three-dimensional (3D) elastoplastic material models for the simulation of cohesionless and cohesive soils, respectively. These models has been evolving over the past two decades with extensive calibration through numerous sources including downhole-array records, laboratory tests, shake-table and centrifuge experiments. These soil models have been available in OpenSees since the early 2000s. The UCSD soil models have now been implemented into a number of analysis packages including FLAC/FLAC3D, LS-DYNA, DIANA and Abaqus as user defined materials. For illustration purposes, one-dimensional (1D) site response analysis examples utilizing these soil models are provided on http://soilquake.net/ucsdsoilmodels/. Note that the compiled files of these soil models provided in the above-mentioned examples are for the 1D site response analysis only. For 3D full version of the UCSD soil models, please contact Prof. Ahmed Elgamal (E-mail: elgamal AT ucsd DOT edu). 1.1. UCSDSAND3 Material Model UCSDSAND3 material is an elasto-plastic material for simulating the essential response characteristics of pressure sensitive soil materials under general loading conditions. Such characteristics include dilatancy (shear-induced volume contraction or dilation) and non-flow liquefaction (cyclic mobility), typically exhibited in sands or silts during monotonic or cyclic loading. In this model, plasticity is formulated based on the multi-surface (nested surfaces) concept, with a non-associative flow rule to reproduce dilatancy effect. The yield surfaces are of the Drucker- Prager type. This sand model reproduces conventional liquefaction triggering logic. 1.2. UCSDCLAY Material Model UCSDCLAY material is an elasto-plastic material model which reproduces nonlinear hysteric shear behavior and accumulation of permanent shear deformation. Plasticity is exhibited only in the deviatoric stress-strain response (Elgamal et al. 2008)*. The volumetric stress-strain response is linear-elastic and independent of the deviatoric response. Nonlinear response is 1

General Information formulated based on the multi-surface (nested surfaces) concept, with an associative flow rule. The yield surfaces are of the von Mises type. This material is implemented to simulate monotonic or cyclic response of materials whose shear behavior is insensitive to the confinement change. Such materials include, for example, clay under fast (undrained) loading conditions. *Elgamal, A., L. Yan, Z. Yang and J. P. Conte. (2008). "Three-dimensional seismic response of Humboldt Bay bridge foundation-ground System," Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 134(7), 1165-1176. 2

Input 2 INSTALLATION UCSDSAND3 and UCSDCLAY have been implemented into a number of analysis packages including FLAC/FLAC3D, LS-DYNA, DIANA and Abaqus and as user defined materials (UDM). Below is information on how to install and use these materials. 2.1. FLAC Note: The UCSD material files are currently available for 32-bit version of FLAC, and will not run for 64 bit. 1. Visit http://soilquake.net/ucsdsoilmodels/flac.html to download FLAC_Example.rar which contains the UCSD material models and corresponding examples files. 2. If you do not already have FLAC 8, please visit http://www.itascacg.com/software to download a 32-bit installation file. A free demo version which allows UDM can be found here. This installation may require a restart. 3. Extract all the files in FLAC_Example.rar to a desired location. 4. If you have: a. FLAC 7 Move modelucsdclaydemo003.dll and modelucsdsand3demo003.dll to C:\Program Files (x86) \Itasca\FLAC700\Exe32\plugins\models (default location). If you specified a different location for FLAC, please move.dll files to the models folder. b. FLAC 8 Move modelucsdclaydemo005.dll and modelucsdsand3demo005.dll to C:\Program Files (x86) \Itasca\FLAC800\Exe32\plugins\models (default location). If you specified a different location for FLAC, please move the.dll files to the models folder. 5. Update FLAC_location.txt with the location of the FLAC installation. 3

Input 2.2. LS-DYNA 1. Visit http://soilquake.net/ucsdsoilmodels/ls_dyna.html to download LS- DYNA_Example.rar which contains the UCSD material models and corresponding examples files. 2. If you do not already have LS-DYNA, please visit http://www.lstc.com/download/ to obtain the analysis package. 3. Extract all the files in LS-DYNA_Example.rar to a desired location. 4. Move lsdyna_ucsddemosoilmodels.exe to the main folder of the LS-DYNA installation directory. 5. Update LS_DYNA_location.txt with the location of the lsdyna.exe. 2.3. DIANA 1. Coming Soon! 2.4. Abaqus 1. Visit http://soilquake.net/ucsdsoilmodels/abaqus.html to download Abaqus_Example.rar which contains the UCSD material models and corresponding examples files. 2. If you do not already have Abaqus, please visit https://www.3ds.com/ to obtain the analysis package. 3. Extract all the files in Abaqus_Example.rar to a desired location. 4

Input 4. Please move explicitu-d.dll (explicit analysis) and standardu.dll (implicit analysis) to the userlib folder inside the Abaqus installation folder. (ex. C:\SIMULIA\Abaqus\userlib). If the path was changed, please move to appropriate folder. 5. Add usub_lib_dir="c:\simulia\abaqus\userlib" (same path as step 4) to abaqus_v6.env, which can be found in the site folder. (ex. C:\SIMULIA\Abaqus\6.14-2\SMA\site) 6. Update Abaqus_location.txt with the location of the Abaqus installation. 5

Input 3 INPUT After you download and moved the UCSD material model, you can make use of the 1D_Seismic_Site_Response_Example.xlsm to perform a site response analysis. A large majority of the of the process has been automated, which includes generation of the input file and initiating the analysis. Below is a description of the necessary inputs for the excel sheet. 3.1. Program Program Name: Name of the analysis package that should be used with this excel sheet. (Do not change.) 3.2. Input File File Name: Enter a file name of the project file that will be created. Should be entered without the extension. 3.3. Water Table Height (m): Enter the desired water table height. (0 is for ground surface.) 3.4. Rayleigh Damping For Abaqus/LS-DYNA: Stiffness Proportional: Enter the stiffness proportional damping term to be used. (Currently stiffness proportional damping is not available for Abaqus.) Mass Proportional: Enter the mass proportional damping term to be used. For FLAC: Fraction of Critical Damping: Enter the damping at the center frequency. Center Frequency: Enter the frequency with the minimum damping. 6

Input 3.5. Analysis Parameter Type: Select for implicit or explicit analysis. This option should be explicit for FLAC, and LS-DYNA. Implicit should be used for Abaqus. Newmark - Beta: Enter the beta parameter for the Newton method algorithm. (Only available for implicit analysis.) Newmark - Enter the gamma parameter for the Newton method algorithm. (Only available for implicit analysis.) 3.6. Input Motion File Name: Select an input motion from a drop-down list. Scale Factor: The scale factor used to amplify the input motion. Time Step: Enter the desired time step for the dynamic analysis. Can be set to zero, to allow the time step to be automatically specified. Number of Cycles: If SineWave is selected, you can enter the number of cycles for the SineWave input. Frequency (Hz.): Enter the desired frequency for the SineWave input. 3.7. Soil Properties Under the section titled soil properties, 4 different soil layers can be defined. The parameters that need to be supplied are as follows: Soil Type: Select from a drop down list the desired material type. The corresponding properties will populate the table. Additional materials can be added in the material properties sheet. Layer Thickness (m): Enter the thickness of the soil layer. Number of Elements: Enter number of elements for soil layer. Density (Mg/m3): Enter the desired density of the soil layer. 7

Input Shear Modulus (kpa): Enter the low-strain shear modulus of the soil layer. Bulk Modulus (kpa): Enter the low-strain bulk modulus of the soil layer. Friction Angle ( ): Enter friction angle for the soil layer. Cohesion (kpa): Enter the cohesion for the soil layer. Peak Shear Strain (%): Enter the shear strain where the shear strength is reached. Number of Yield Surface: Enter the number of yield surfaces for the stress-strain backbone curve. Reference Pressure (kpa): Enter the confinement at which the shear modulus and bulk modulus are defined. contrac1/contrac2/contrac3: A non-negative constant defining the rate of shearinduced volume decrease (contraction) or pore pressure buildup. A larger value corresponds to faster contraction rate. dilat1/dilat2/dilat3: Non-negative constants defining the rate of shear-induced volume increase (dilation). Larger values correspond to stronger dilation rate. liquefac1/liquefac2: Parameters controlling the mechanism of liquefaction-induced perfectly plastic shear strain accumulation, i.e., cyclic mobility. mtype: Specify 0, 1 or 2 to specify if the shear strength should match triaxial compression (0), triaxial extension (1), or simple shear (2). b1/b2/b3/b4: Additional contraction parameters. 8

Using the Excel Sheet 4 USING THE EXCEL SHEET 1. If prompted, please enable macros or active content. This Excel sheet makes use of macros to generate the input files and run the analysis using the selected analysis program. 2. Enter desired parameters as explained in the previous section titled "Input". 3. Click Run" to create an input file according to entered parameters and start the analysis. This process is completely automated. Please do not click or type until the analysis is started. If you wish to view previously completed runs, please use the View Results button. For additional information please reference the sections below for the corresponding analysis package. 4.1. FLAC Note: If this is your first time using FLAC, you may be prompted to copy application data. In this case you will need to select an appropriate location and click "OK". After this the analysis, can start. You may need to close FLAC and press "Run" again. 1. When the analysis is completed, you should be able to click the tabs as shown below. Clicking the various tabs will update the screen with the corresponding plots as indicated by the title of the tab. 2. Additionally, you can right click the tab and select edit to change the plot. This will allow you to view responses that are not shown by default (Figure 2). After you select edit you will see various items that can be selected. The currently available histories are shear stress (Effective SXY), shear strain (shearstrain_z), acceleration, displacement, effective vertical stress (Effective SYY), effective horizontal stress (Effective SXX), pore pressure (Grid-point pp) and confinement (conf). The lower most element and nodes are labeled as 1, and increases by 1 as you approach ground surface. This numbering convention is used in the names of the time histories. 9

Using the Excel Sheet Figure 1 FLAC GUI Note: To view the data as time histories, you want to change the item in the first column and leave the "Dynamic time" selected in the second. Figure 2 Updating history plot 10

Using the Excel Sheet 4.2. LS-DYNA 1. When the analysis is completed, you can click View Results to open the LS-DYNA interface. The different time histories can be accessed from the nodal and element option. The nodal option includes acceleration and displacement time histories, while the element option contains the stress, strain and pore water pressure time histories (history var#1 and history var#2 for total and excess respectively). 2. After choosing the desired time history you can click a location on the model to view the selected time history for that area. Figure 3 LS-DYNA GUI 4.3. DIANA 1. Coming Soon! 11

Using the Excel Sheet 4.4. Abaqus 1. When the analysis is completed, you can click View Results to open the Abaqus interface. After loading the interface, the acceleration, displacement, strain and stress should be readily available as shown below. Clicking the desired time history and selecting plot will update the Abaqus interface. Figure 4 Abaqus GUI 12