Rest-frame Optical Spectra: A Window into Galaxy Formation at z~2

Similar documents
Ionization, excitation, and abundance ratios in z~2-3 star-forming galaxies with KBSS-MOSFIRE

Physical properties of high-z star-forming galaxies with FMOS-COSMOS

Observations of High-Redshift Galaxies and What Can Be Inferred from Them. Alice Shapley (UCLA)

Galaxies Across Cosmic Time

High-Redshift Galaxies: A brief summary

Introduction and Motivation

Physical conditions of the interstellar medium in star-forming galaxies at z~1.5

Galaxies 626. Lecture 9 Metals (2) and the history of star formation from optical/uv observations

Neon Emission in HST Emission- Line Galaxies at z 2. Greg Zeimann

Observations of galaxy evolution. Pieter van Dokkum

Gas Masses and Gas Fractions: Applications of the Kennicutt- Schmidt Law at High Redshift

Star Formation Indicators

The PRIsm MUlti-object Survey (PRIMUS)

The The largest assembly ESO high-redshift. Lidia Tasca & VUDS collaboration

Tracing the Evolution and Distribution of Metallicity in the Early Universe

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ga] 10 Apr 2015

Surveys at z 1. Petchara Pattarakijwanich 20 February 2013

Vivienne Wild. Timing the starburst AGN connection

Benjamin Weiner Steward Observatory November 15, 2009 Research Interests

High Redshift Universe

Gas Accretion & Outflows from Redshift z~1 Galaxies

Interpreting Galaxies across Cosmic Time with Binary Population Synthesis Models

Paul Sell. University of Wisconsin-Madison Advisor: Christy Tremonti

Measuring star formation in galaxies and its evolution. Andrew Hopkins Australian Astronomical Observatory

THE MOSDEF SURVEY: NO SIGNIFICANT ENHANCEMENT IN STAR FORMATION OR DEFICIT IN METALLICITY IN MERGING GALAXY PAIRS AT 1.5 z 3.5 1

Subaru/WFIRST Synergies for Cosmology and Galaxy Evolution

The Galaxy Evolution Explorer. Michael Rich, UCLA. Samir Salim Ryan Mallery

Anatomy of an X-ray detected cluster at z = 2: low metallicities and enhanced specific star formation rates in star-forming galaxies.

COSMOS-CLASH:The existence and universality of the FMR at z<2.5 and environmental effects

Daichi Kashino Nagoya

Jens Melinder. With financial support from CNES/CNRS convention #

Quantifying the Assembly History of Elliptical Galaxies

BUILDING GALAXIES. Question 1: When and where did the stars form?

9. Evolution with redshift - z > 1.5. Selection in the rest-frame UV

Deep Keck Spectroscopy of High-Redshift Quiescent Galaxies

Feeding the Beast. Chris Impey (University of Arizona)

arxiv: v3 [astro-ph.ga] 14 Apr 2015

Probing the Origin of Supermassive Black Hole Seeds with Nearby Dwarf Galaxies. Amy Reines Einstein Fellow NRAO Charlottesville

Galaxies 626. Lecture 10 The history of star formation from far infrared and radio observations

Stellar Populations: Resolved vs. unresolved

Lecture 11: SDSS Sources at Other Wavelengths: From X rays to radio. Astr 598: Astronomy with SDSS

Bursty stellar populations and AGN in bulges

Wide Field Camera 3: The SOC Science Program Proposal

Multi-wavelength Surveys for AGN & AGN Variability. Vicki Sarajedini University of Florida

A Monster at any other Epoch:

Mass, Metallicity and Dynamics in high redshift galaxies

Compact Starbursts: Extreme Star Formation and Feedback at High Density Aleks Diamond-Stanic Grainger Fellow, University of Wisconsin

STAR FORMATION RATES observational overview. Ulrike Kuchner

Margherita Talia 2015 A&A, 582, 80 ELG2017. University of Bologna. m g 1

Quantifying the (Late) Assembly History of Galaxies. Michael Pierce (University of Wyoming)

Unveiling the nature of bright z ~ 7 galaxies with HST and JWST

THE GAS MASS AND STAR FORMATION RATE

Emission lines in star-forming galaxies

A mid and far-ir view of the star formation activity in galaxy systems and their surroundings

The evolution of the Galaxy Stellar Mass Function:

PASTIS: Probing Abundances and Star formation Timescales with Integral field Spectroscopy Anna Gallazzi INAF - Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri

SURVEYS: THE MASS ASSEMBLY AND STAR FORMATION HISTORY

Empirical Evidence for AGN Feedback

What lensed galaxies can tell us about winds, hot stars, and physical conditions

Lecture 2: Galaxy types, spectra

Lecture 2: Galaxy types, spectra. Galaxies AS

High-redshift galaxies

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.co] 5 Aug 2013

Environmental effects on galaxy evolution in the distant Universe

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 18 Apr 2006

STRONG NEBULAR LINE RATIOS IN THE SPECTRA OF Z 2 3 STAR-FORMING GALAXIES: FIRST RESULTS FROM KBSS-MOSFIRE 1

Kai Noeske Keck Foundation Fellow Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics

MOS: A critical tool for current & future radio surveys Daniel J.B. Smith, University of Hertfordshire, UK.

Demographics of radio galaxies nearby and at z~0.55. Are radio galaxies signposts to black-hole mergers?

EUCLID Legacy with Spectroscopy

Observing the Formation of Dense Stellar Nuclei at Low and High Redshift (?) Roderik Overzier Max-Planck-Institute for Astrophysics

Two Main Techniques. I: Star-forming Galaxies

The ALMA z=4 Survey (AR4S)

Revealing new optically-emitting extragalactic Supernova Remnants

The mass metallicity star formation rate relation at z 2with3D Hubble Space Telescope

Diffuse Media Science with BigBOSS

Understanding Lyα Emission Using LBGs (and vice versa)

Lecture 10. (1) Radio star formation rates. Galaxy mass assembly history

- AGN feedback in action?

Test #1! Test #2! Test #2: Results!

EUCLID Spectroscopy. Andrea Cimatti. & the EUCLID-NIS Team. University of Bologna Department of Astronomy

Keck/Subaru Exchange Program Subaru Users Meeting January 20, 2011

INVESTIGATING Hα, UV, AND IR STAR-FORMATION RATE DIAGNOSTICS FOR A LARGE SAMPLE OF z 2 GALAXIES

What Can We Learn from Galaxy Clustering 1: Why Galaxy Clustering is Useful for AGN Clustering. Alison Coil UCSD

Luminous Quasars and AGN Surveys with ELTs

Low Luminosity AGNs: The Power of JWST. Shobita Satyapal Nick Abel(UC), Nathan Secrest (NRL), Dillon Berger (GMU), Sara Ellison(UVIC)

Observations of First Light

Halo Gas Velocities Using Multi-slit Spectroscopy

Ken-ichi Tadaki (NAOJ, JSPS research fellow)

EVLA + ALMA represent > 10x improvement in observational capabilities from 1GHz to 1 THz

Emission-lines calibrations of the Star Formation Rate from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey

The Swift GRB Host Galaxy Legacy Survey

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 6 Dec 1996

X-ray emission from star-forming galaxies

Alaina Henry Goddard Space Flight Center

Spectroscopic Identification of Galaxies in the HUDF using MUSE

Resolved Spectroscopy of Adolescent and Infant Galaxies (1 < z < 10) July 18, 2014 TMT Science Forum, Tucson

Investigating the connection between LyC and Lyα emission and other indirect indicators

Astronomy 730. Evolution

The Cosmic History of Star Formation. James Dunlop Institute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh

Transcription:

Rest-frame Optical Spectra: A Window into Galaxy Formation at z~2 Alice Shapley (UCLA) Collaborators: Mariska Kriek, Naveen Reddy, Brian Siana, Alison Coil, Bahram Mobasher, Bill Freeman, Ryan Sanders, Sedona Price, Laura DeGroot

Introduction What are the physical processes driving star formation in individual galaxies? How are stellar mass and structure assembled in galaxies (in situ star formation vs. mergers)? How do galaxies exchange gas and heavy elements with the intergalactic medium? What is the nature of the co-evolution of black holes and stellar populations? Rest-frame optical spectroscopic observations across cosmic time will address all of these questions.

The Local Universe Massive surveys like the Sloan Digital Sky Survey SDSS) and 2dF Galaxy Redshift survey give detailed description of local galaxy population: the endpoint. (Blanton & Moustakas 2009) Imaging and spectra of >10 6 galaxies. Distributions in luminosity, color, mass (stellar, dynamical, BH), structure, gas content, metallicity, environment, clustering. Correlations among these properties.

The Local Universe Massive surveys like the Sloan Digital Sky Survey SDSS) and 2dF Galaxy Redshift survey give detailed description of local galaxy population: the endpoint. (Blanton & Moustakas 2009) Imaging and spectra of >10 6 galaxies. Distributions in luminosity, color, mass (stellar, dynamical, BH), structure, gas content, metallicity, environment, clustering. Correlations among these properties.

Earlier Epochs (Moustakas et al. 2013) (Faber et al. 2007) For the full story, we need data from earlier epochs. Several spectroscopic surveys probe out to z~1 (DEEP2, VVDS, zcosmos, PRIMUS). Sample sizes of ~10 4-10 5 galaxies. Evolution in luminosities, masses, colors, sizes, and environments of star-forming and quiescent galaxies.

The Next Frontier: z~1.5-3.5 (Reddy et al. 2008) (Hopkins et al. 2007) z~1.5-3.5 hosts the peak of both star formation and BH accretion activity. Qualitative imprints of local galaxy population (bimodal distribution of colors, strong clustering of red galaxies). Big differences as well: diversity among massive galaxies; absence of cold, quiescent disks; higher specific SFRs; ubiquitous galaxy outflows.

The Next Frontier: z~1.5-3.5 (Cassata et al. 2008) z~1.5-3.5 hosts the peak of both star formation and BH accretion activity. Qualitative imprints of local galaxy population (bimodal distribution of colors, strong clustering of red galaxies). Big differences as well: diversity among massive galaxies; absence of cold, quiescent disks; higher specific SFRs; ubiquitous galaxy outflows.

The Next Frontier: z~1.5-3.5 (Kriek et al. 2009) z~1.5-3.5 hosts the peak of both star formation and BH accretion activity. Qualitative imprints of local galaxy population (bimodal distribution of colors, strong clustering of red galaxies). Big differences as well: diversity among massive galaxies; absence of cold, quiescent disks; higher specific SFRs; ubiquitous galaxy outflows.

The Next Frontier: z~1.5-3.5 (Wuyts et al. 2011) (Law et al. 2009) z~1.5-3.5 hosts the peak of both star formation and BH accretion activity. Qualitative imprints of local galaxy population (bimodal distribution of colors, strong clustering of red galaxies). Big differences as well: diversity among massive galaxies; absence of cold, quiescent disks; higher specific SFRs; ubiquitous galaxy outflows.

Spectroscopy at z>1.5 (Steidel et al. 2010) Most studies of galaxies at z>1.5 based on multiwavelength photometry photometric redshifts. Until recently, spectroscopy was dominated by rest-uv observations of UV-selected galaxies (e.g., Steidel et al. 2003, 2004). Such studies are weighted towards relatively blue, starforming galaxies. Rest-UV is a great probe of the ISM, outflows, and massive stars.

Spectroscopy at z>1.5 (Brammer et al. 2012) (Erb et al. 2006) With the HST WFC3/IR grism, new surveys of ~10,000 galaxies with rest-frame optical spectroscopy for full range of galaxy types (3D-HST, WISP). Low resolution (R~130, i.e. >2,000 km/s), limited wavelength range (λ<1.6 µm). Samples of moderate (R>1000) resolution spectra at these redshifts are very small, and typically for one near-ir filter at a time (e.g., Erb et al. 2006).

Rest-frame Optical Spectra Emission-line set: [OII], Hβ, [OIII], Hα, [NII], [SII] Ratios of emission lines used to infer a wide range of physical conditions: SFR {Balmer lines} Metallicity (oxygen) {R 23, N2, O3N2, others} Electron density {[OII] and [SII] doublet ratios} Ionization parameter {[OIII]/[OII]} (Kennicutt 1998) Electron temperature {[OIII] ratios} Dust extinction {Balmer line ratios}

Rest-frame Optical Spectra Emission-line set: [OII], Hβ, [OIII], Hα, [NII], [SII] Hβ (Kennicutt 1998) Hα Ratios of emission lines used to infer a wide range of physical conditions: SFR {Balmer lines} Metallicity (oxygen) {R 23, N2, O3N2, others} Electron density {[OII] and [SII] doublet ratios} Ionization parameter {[OIII]/[OII]} Electron temperature {[OIII] ratios} Dust extinction {Balmer line ratios}

Rest-frame Optical Spectra Emission-line set: [OII], Hβ, [OIII], Hα, [NII], [SII] [OII] Hβ [OIII] (Kennicutt 1998) Ratios of emission lines used to infer a wide range of physical conditions: SFR {Balmer lines} Metallicity (oxygen) {R 23, N2, O3N2, others} Electron density {[OII] and [SII] doublet ratios} Ionization parameter {[OIII]/[OII]} Electron temperature {[OIII] ratios} Dust extinction {Balmer line ratios}

Rest-frame Optical Spectra Hα+ [NII] Emission-line set: [OII], Hβ, [OIII], Hα, [NII], [SII] Ratios of emission lines used to infer a wide range of physical conditions: SFR {Balmer lines} Metallicity (oxygen) {R 23, N2, O3N2, others} Electron density {[OII] and [SII] doublet ratios} Ionization parameter {[OIII]/[OII]} (Kennicutt 1998) Electron temperature {[OIII] ratios} Dust extinction {Balmer line ratios}

Rest-frame Optical Spectra [OII] Hβ [OIII] Hα+ [NII] Emission-line set: [OII], Hβ, [OIII], Hα, [NII], [SII] Ratios of emission lines used to infer a wide range of physical conditions: SFR {Balmer lines} Metallicity (oxygen) {R 23, N2, O3N2, others} Electron density {[OII] and [SII] doublet ratios} Ionization parameter {[OIII]/[OII]} (Kennicutt 1998) Electron temperature {[OIII] ratios} Dust extinction {Balmer line ratios}

Rest-frame Optical Spectra Emission-line set: [OII], Hβ, [OIII], Hα, [NII], [SII] [OII] [SII] Ratios of emission lines used to infer a wide range of physical conditions: SFR {Balmer lines} Metallicity (oxygen) {R 23, N2, O3N2, others} Electron density {[OII] and [SII] doublet ratios} Ionization parameter {[OIII]/[OII]} (Kennicutt 1998) Electron temperature {[OIII] ratios} Dust extinction {Balmer line ratios}

Rest-frame Optical Spectra Emission-line set: [OII], Hβ, [OIII], Hα, [NII], [SII] [OII] [OIII] (Kennicutt 1998) Ratios of emission lines used to infer a wide range of physical conditions: SFR {Balmer lines} Metallicity (oxygen) {R 23, N2, O3N2, others} Electron density {[OII] and [SII] doublet ratios} Ionization parameter {[OIII]/[OII]} Electron temperature {[OIII] ratios} Dust extinction {Balmer line ratios}

Rest-frame Optical Spectra Emission-line set: [OII], Hβ, [OIII], Hα, [NII], [SII] [OIII] [OIII] Ratios of emission lines used to infer a wide range of physical conditions: SFR {Balmer lines} Metallicity (oxygen) {R 23, N2, O3N2, others} Electron density {[OII] and [SII] doublet ratios} Ionization parameter {[OIII]/[OII]} (Kennicutt 1998) Electron temperature {[OIII] ratios} Dust extinction {Balmer line ratios}

Rest-frame Optical Spectra Emission-line set: [OII], Hβ, [OIII], Hα, [NII], [SII] Hγ Hβ Hα Ratios of emission lines used to infer a wide range of physical conditions: SFR {Balmer lines} Metallicity (oxygen) {R 23, N2, O3N2, others} Electron density {[OII] and [SII] doublet ratios} Ionization parameter {[OIII]/[OII]} (Kennicutt 1998) Electron temperature {[OIII] ratios} Dust extinction {Balmer line ratios}

Rest-frame Optical Spectra [OII] Hβ [OIII] Hα+ [NII] [SII] Emission-line set: [OII], Hβ, [OIII], Hα, [NII], [SII] Ratios of emission lines used to infer a wide range of physical conditions: SFR {Balmer lines} Metallicity (oxygen) {R 23, N2, O3N2, others} Electron density {[OII] and [SII] doublet ratios} Ionization parameter {[OIII]/[OII]} (Kennicutt 1998) Electron temperature {[OIII] ratios} Dust extinction {Balmer line ratios}

Rest-frame Optical Spectra Hα+ [OII] Hβ [OIII] [NII][SII] Emission-line set: [OII], Hβ, [OIII], Hα, [NII], [SII] Ratios of emission lines used to infer a wide range of physical conditions: SFR {Balmer lines} Metallicity (oxygen) {R 23, N2, O3N2, others} Electron density {[OII] and [SII] doublet ratios} Ionization parameter {[OIII]/[OII]} (Kennicutt 1998) Electron temperature {[OIII] ratios} Dust extinction {Balmer line ratios}

Rest-frame Optical Spectra In addition dynamical masses AGN/SF discrimination outflow properties (Kennicutt 1998)

Rest-frame Optical Spectra Absorption lines At low-z (e.g., SDSS), spectral diagnostics, D n (4000), Hδ A, others, have been used to infer M/L, fraction of mass formed in burst, stellar velocity dispersion, metallicity. The samples for which such measurements have been assembled at z>1.4 are in the handfuls. (Kauffmann et al. 2003) Continuum spectroscopy is HARD at these redshifts.

Rest-frame Optical Spectra (Kennicutt 1998) (Kauffmann et al. 2003) Emission-line set: [OII], Hβ, [OIII], Hα, [NII], [SII] Absorption-line set: Balmer lines, Ca H&K, Mgb, 4000Å break These features form the basis of traditional optical spectroscopy, yield key insights into the stellar and gaseous content of galaxies. At z > 1.4, [OII] moves past 9000Å. Becomes a near-ir problem. To assemble statistical samples of rest-frame optical measurements, we need a transformative boost in S/N and survey efficiency for near- IR spectrographs.

Keck/MOSFIRE Keck/MOSFIRE: Multi-Object Spectrometer for Infra-Red Exploration; co-pis: McLean (UCLA) and Steidel (Caltech) Near-IR (0.9-2.5 µm) spectroscopy over 6.1 3.0 FOV, one band (YJHK) at a time, multiplex advantage up to 46 slits using robotic, cryogenic configurable slit unit. R=2300-3300 with 0.7 slit. Commissioned in spring 2012 on the Keck I telescope. Measurements of rest-frame optical spectra for z=0.5-5 galaxies. http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~irlab/mosfire/

Keck/MOSFIRE Keck/MOSFIRE: Multi-Object Spectrometer for Infra-Red Exploration; co-pis: McLean (UCLA) and Steidel (Caltech) Near-IR (0.9-2.5 µm) spectroscopy over 6.1 3.0 FOV, one band (YJHK) at a time, multiplex advantage up to 46 slits using robotic, cryogenic configurable slit unit. R=2300-3300 with 0.7 slit. Commissioned in spring 2012 on the Keck I telescope. Measurements of rest-frame optical spectra for z=0.5-5 galaxies. http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~irlab/mosfire/

Keck/MOSFIRE Sensitivity boost of at least a factor of ~5 relative to previous Keck instrumentation (NIRSPEC). Emission-line sensitivities of few x 10-18 erg/s/cm 2 in 2 hours. In practice, typical multiplexing of 30-35. Increase in survey efficiency of >2 orders of magnitude!!!!! http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~irlab/mosfire/

The MOSDEF Survey Key requirements for an evolutionary census of the galaxy population at z~1.5-3.5: 1. Rest-frame optical spectroscopy covering all of the strongest rest-frame optical emission/absorption features (3700-7000 Å). 2. A large (N>10 3 ) sample of objects, spanning the full diversity of stellar populations. 3. Multiple redshift bins to enable evolutionary studies. The MOSFIRE Deep Evolution Field (MOSDEF) Survey achieves these goals.

The MOSDEF Survey

The MOSDEF Survey Large UC Keck program. Observing time awarded: 47 Keck I/MOSFIRE nights from 2012B-2016A. Target fields: COSMOS, GOODS-N, AEGIS (overlapping with CANDELS and 3D-HST surveys). Principal redshift ranges: 1.37<z<1.70; 2.09<z<2.61; 2.95<z<3.80. Planned sample: ~500 galaxies at z~1.5; ~1000 galaxies at z~2.3; ~500 galaxies at z~3.4. Target selection: H-band magnitude limited (rest-frame optical luminosity), also construct mass-limited samples.

The MOSDEF Survey: Target Fields Target fields: COSMOS, GOODS-N, AEGIS (overlapping with CANDELS and 3D-HST surveys) Extensive ancillary multi-wavelength photometric datasets: HST ACS+WFC3, Spitzer/IRAC+MIPS, Chandra, Herschel/PACS+SPIRE, VLA, ground-based imaging Existing spectroscopy: various ground-based sources, 3D-HST grism. Catalogs: 3D-HST photometric compilation, photometric redshifts, stellar population modeling

The MOSDEF Survey: z Ranges Principal redshift ranges: ² 1.37<z<1.70 ² 2.09<z<2.61 ² 2.95<z<3.80 Ranges selected to optimize detection of rest-frame optical emission lines within windows of atmospheric transmission.

The MOSDEF Survey: Spectra Example z~2 2D spectra [OII] in J, [OIII]+Hb in H, Ha+[NII]+[SII] in K Range of line ratios, velocity widths, spatial morphologies

The MOSDEF Survey: Spectra Example extracted, fluxcalibrated 1D spectra. [OII] in J, [OIII]+Hb in H, Ha +[NII]+[SII] in K

The MOSDEF Survey: Demographics 3 target redshift ranges clearly visible. Focus on z~2 range (~170 targets) Wide range of properties probed in M*, ssfr space in z~2 sample. Complete to 10 10 M, measurements down to 10 9 M.

The MOSDEF Survey: Success Overall 85% spectroscopic success rate. Success rate remains above 75% even in faintest bin. Achieve S/N=3 for Hα fluxes of few times 10-18 erg/s/cm 2 in K-band with 2-hour exposure times, corresponds to SFR~1M /yr at z~2.

The MOSDEF Survey: Science Star formation and the growth of galaxies Dust attenuation Metallicities and physical conditions (density, excitation) The cycle of baryons (outflows, inflows) Dynamical masses and structural evolution AGN accretion and BH/Galaxy co-evolution

The MOSDEF Survey: Science (Wuyts et al. 2011) MOSDEF Star formation and the growth of galaxies SFR vs. M* relation used to quantify the growth of galaxies. Evolution in normalization, slope, and scatter. Most previous samples are either photometric only, or very incomplete. Most use rest-uv or SED fitting for SFR estimates. Hα is instantaneous measure of SFR, true measure of stochastisity, deviations from the main sequence of star formation. Comparisons between UV and Hα SFRs will also be very useful (IMF, SF-history). Measurement of rest-frame optical emission lines will allow for cleaner SED fits.

The MOSDEF Survey: Science (Reddy et al. 2014) z=2.1-2.6 MOSDEF Dust attenuation Vast majority of dust extinction estimates at high z are based on rest-frame UV colors or SED fitting. In order to utilize Hα for SFR estimates, we need robust estimates of nebular extinction. Much debate about nebular vs. stellar extinction at high redshift. For the first time, we are obtaining a statistical sample of Balmer decrements for individual objects at z>1. Early results suggest nebular extinction systematically higher than stellar extinction. More consistent with relation E(B-V) neb =1/0.44E(B-V) stars than E(B-V) neb =E(B-V) stars, like local starbursts.

The MOSDEF Survey: Science (Tremonti et al. 2004) (Mannucci et al. 2010) Metallicities Metal content of galaxies reflects the past integral of star formation, modified by the effects of gas inflow (i.e., accretion) and outflow (i.e., feedback). Meaningful when considered together with stellar masses (M-Z relation), gas masses and SFRs à Gas flows! Samples of objects at z > 1 with individual M-Z measurements are tiny, while the stacked sample at z = 2. 2 masks the scatter in the relation.

The MOSDEF Survey: Science (Maiolino et al. 2008) Metallicities Metal content of galaxies reflects the past integral of star formation, modified by the effects of gas inflow (i.e., accretion) and outflow (i.e., feedback). Meaningful when considered together with stellar masses (M-Z relation), gas masses and SFRs à Gas flows! Samples of objects at z > 1 with individual M-Z measurements are tiny, while the stacked sample at z = 2. 2 masks the scatter in the relation.

The MOSDEF Survey: Science (Sanders, Shapley et al. 2014) Metallicities We have assembled N2 metallicities for our z~2 sample. Detect well-known offset towards lower metallicity at fixed mass. Scatter! Fair sample at z~2. We don t detect the Fundamental Metallicity Relation seen at low redshift, with higher-sfr galaxies offset towards lower metallicity at fixed mass. There may be issues with using locallycalibrated metallicity indicators.

The MOSDEF Survey: Science Physical conditions As we showed several years ago with small samples of objects, z>1 star-forming galaxies are offset in the BPT excitation diagram used to separate star-forming galaxies from AGNs. (Kauffmann et al. 2003) What is the cause of this offset? (Brinchmann et al. 2008)

The MOSDEF Survey: Science z~2 MOSDEF (Shapley et al. 2014) What is the cause of this offset? Physical conditions With a statistical sample already in early MOSDEF data, we can see that the offset is real! If line ratios are different in high redshift galaxies, suggests differences in physical conditions in HII regions. Higher ionization parameter (geometry of stars relative to gas); harder ionizing radiation field (e.g., Steidel et al. 2014; Kewley et al. 2013). With MOSDEF, we will isolate the factors leading to this offset (HII region density, ionization parameter, SFR surface density), and attempt to recalibrate metallicity indicators!

The MOSDEF Survey: Science z~2 MOSDEF (Coil et al. 2014) AGN activity We typically target a small number of X- ray and/or IR-selected AGNs on each mask. Use MOSFIRE spectra to identify additional AGNs. We will study AGN demographics, distributions of BH accretion rates, methods of AGN detection. With early sample of AGNs (red X-ray, burgunday IR), we are starting to understand the excitation properties of these systems, and how they relate to star-forming galaxies. Local discriminators (BPT, MeX) may not work as well at z~2.

The MOSDEF Survey: Science (Kriek et al. 2014) Stellar absorption lines The current sample of z>1.5 galaxies with continuum and stellar absorption detections is less than ten objects (van de Sande et al. 2013)! We detect continuum for our brightest targets, e.g., COSMOS-11982 (z=2.09). Even better, we detect stellar absorption lines!!! Detailed comparision with stellar population models à SF-history. Robust estimates of dynamical mass (combined with HST imaging). Estimate of stellar metallicity. Stacking to detect absorption lines in fainter galaxies.

Summary We have entered into a new regime for rest-frame optical spectroscopy of the distant universe. It is now possible to obtain robust, unbiased statistical samples of the gaseous and stellar contents of galaxies at z>1. We are conducting the MOSDEF survey with MOSFIRE on Keck. The survey leverages existing multi-wavelength datasets in the COSMOS, AEGIS, and GOODS-N fields, and will address many key questions in galaxy formation. With MOSDEF, we probe the star-formation and assembly histories of galaxies, their dynamical and structural properties, the evolution of their dust and metal content, the physical conditions under which stars are forming, the cycling of baryons, and the evolution of AGN activity. The survey has commenced, with early science underway. Stay tuned for much, much more!