International Space Station (ISS) Nears A Six-Figure Orbit Count

Similar documents
Falcon Heavy's Maiden Launch Opens An Interplanetary Superhighway

SOLVING THE INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION (ISS) MOTION CONTROL LONG-TERM PLANNING PROBLEM

Apollo 15 Trans-Earth Trajectory Reconstruction

GRAIL Takes A Roundabout Route To Lunar Orbit

USA Space Debris Environment, Operations, and Policy Updates

Orbit Design Marcelo Suárez. 6th Science Meeting; Seattle, WA, USA July 2010

Earth's Pseudo-Moon 2016 HO 3

Orbit Evolution of the Swarm Mission Detlef Sieg

Orbit and Transmit Characteristics of the CloudSat Cloud Profiling Radar (CPR) JPL Document No. D-29695

Accuracy Assessment of SGP4 Orbit Information Conversion into Osculating Elements

SPACE DEBRIS MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES

USA Space Debris Environment, Operations, and Modeling Updates

Successful Demonstration for Upper Stage Controlled Re-entry Experiment by H-IIB Launch Vehicle

ISS Intergovernmental Agreement

Earth Departure Trajectory Reconstruction of Apollo Program Components Undergoing Disposal in Interplanetary Space

New Worlds Observer Final Report Appendix J. Appendix J: Trajectory Design and Orbit Determination Lead Author: Karen Richon

COE CST Fifth Annual Technical Meeting. Space Environment MMOD Modeling and Prediction. Sigrid Close and Alan Li Stanford University

USA Space Debris Environment and Operational Updates

CHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE

Satellite Orbital Maneuvers and Transfers. Dr Ugur GUVEN

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT OF GEOSTATIONARY-EARTH-ORBIT WITH SIMPLIFIED PERTURBATIONS MODELS

CHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE

ESSE Payload Design. 1.2 Introduction to Space Missions

Figure 1. View of ALSAT-2A spacecraft

DE-ORBITATION STUDIES AND OPERATIONS FOR SPIRALE GTO SATELLITES

RAPID GEOSYNCHRONOUS TRANSFER ORBIT ASCENT PLAN GENERATION. Daniel X. Junker (1) Phone: ,

Coordinates on the Sphere

Statistical methods to address the compliance of GTO with the French Space Operations Act

SLR-based orbit determination and orbit prediction of space debris objects

PERFORMANCES OF ATMOSPHERIC DENSITY MODELS DURING SATELLITE REENTRY PREDICTION CAMPAIGNS AT SUNSPOT MINIMUM

Experimental Analysis of Low Earth Orbit Satellites due to Atmospheric Perturbations

Laser de-spin maneuver for an active debris removal mission - a realistic scenario for Envisat

Achievements of Space Debris Observation

MAE 180A: Spacecraft Guidance I, Summer 2009 Homework 4 Due Thursday, July 30.

CHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE

Ryan K. Decker * NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Alabama. Lee Burns Raytheon, Huntsville, Alabama

Astrodynamics (AERO0024)

A Peek At Cassini After 7 Years In Saturn Orbit

Phobos-Grunt's Inexorable Trans-Mars Injection (TMI) Countdown Clock

NAVIGATION & MISSION DESIGN BRANCH

A Notional Round Trip To The Trans-Lunar Libration Point (EML2)

Hubble Space Telescope: NASA s Plans for a Servicing Mission

Results and Analyses of Debris Tracking from Mt Stromlo

A Notional Lunar Surface Rendezvous Mission In 2019

Overview of JAXA Activities on Sustainable Space Development and Space Situational Awareness

1. (a) Describe the difference between over-expanded, under-expanded and ideallyexpanded

INTER-AGENCY SPACE DEBRIS COORDINATION COMMITTEE (IADC) SPACE DEBRIS ISSUES IN THE GEOSTATIONARY ORBIT AND THE GEOSTATIONARY TRANSFER ORBITS

Bubble-Detector Measurements for Matroshka-R and Radi-N2: ISS-51/52 and ISS-53/54

AS3010: Introduction to Space Technology

Analysis of Debris from the Collision of the Cosmos 2251 and the Iridium 33 Satellites

MAHALAKSHMI ENGINEERING COLLEGE-TRICHY QUESTION BANK UNIT I PART A

Critical Density of Spacecraft in Low Earth Orbit: Using Fragmentation Data to Evaluate the Stability of the Orbital Debris Environment

ERBE Geographic Scene and Monthly Snow Data

Analysis of the Briz-M Propellant Tank (35698) Fragmentation Using the Velocity Perturbations of the Fragments

The post launch assessment review confirmed the following previous assertions about the mission status:

The Characteristics and Consequences of the Break-up of the Fengyun-1C Spacecraft

Lunar Landing Trajectory and Abort Trajectory Integrated Optimization Design.

QB50 Proposed Deployment ConOps. Dan Oltrogge Center for Space Standards and Innovation Co-Lead, QB50 Orbit Dynamics Working Group

Implementation of Real-Time Monitoring and Warning of Near-Earth Space Dangerous Events by Roscosmos. I. Oleynikov, V. Ivanov, and M.

CFD Analysis of a Passive Deorbit Device

Orbital Debris Observation via Laser Illuminated Optical Measurement Techniques

Implementation of the Outer Space Treaties in view of Small Satellites

Space Debris Activities in India

Stephen H. Knowles Integrity Applications, Inc. Chantilly, VA apps.com

Improvement of Orbits of Geostationary Satellites from Observations Over a Time Interval of Days

21 Flight checklists Mission 1: Delta-glider to ISS

Marlene H. Dortch Secretary, Federal Communications Commission th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C

Human Spaceflight Value Study Was the Shuttle a Good Deal?

Ulrich Walter. Astronautics. The Physics of Space Flight. 2nd, Enlarged and Improved Edition

IMPACT OF SPACE DEBRIS MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS ON THE MISSION DESIGN OF ESA SPACECRAFT

THE TRAJECTORY CONTROL STRATEGIES FOR AKATSUKI RE-INSERTION INTO THE VENUS ORBIT

PREDICTING THE ATMOSPHERIC RE-ENTRY OF SPACE DEBRIS THROUGH THE QB50 ENTRYSAT MISSION

Space Debris Re-entries and Aviation Safety

Feedback Control of Spacecraft Rendezvous Maneuvers using Differential Drag

Rocket Science 102 : Energy Analysis, Available vs Required

InSight's Earth Departure For Mars. Coplanar Trajectory Design Leading To Earth Departure For Mars

LOTNAV. A Low-Thrust Interplanetary Navigation Tool: The Trajectory Reconstruction Module

IADC Re-Entry Prediction Campaigns

MULTI PURPOSE MISSION ANALYSIS DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK MUPUMA

Planning, Simulation, and Assessment of Various Missions from Wallops Flight Facility using Satellite Toolkit (STK)

Design of Orbits and Spacecraft Systems Engineering. Scott Schoneman 13 November 03

STATUS OF JAPANESE METEOROLOGICAL SATELLITES AND RECENT ACTIVITIES OF MSC

These notes may contain copyrighted material! They are for your own use only during this course.

Why Do We Explore Space?

Orbit Representation

ANNUAL CLIMATE REPORT 2016 SRI LANKA

Celestial Mechanics III. Time and reference frames Orbital elements Calculation of ephemerides Orbit determination

TUNDRA DISPOSAL ORBIT STUDY

Long-Term Evolution of High Earth Orbits: Effects of Direct Solar Radiation Pressure and Comparison of Trajectory Propagators

SATELLITE RE-ENTRY PREDICTION PRODUCTS FOR CIVIL PROTECTION APPLICATIONS. C. Pardini & L. Anselmo

Section 13. Orbit Perturbation. Orbit Perturbation. Atmospheric Drag. Orbit Lifetime

A/AC.105/C.2/2015/CRP.18

Astrodynamics (AERO0024)

FIRE SAIL: MESSENGER S USE OF SOLAR RADIATION PRESSURE FOR ACCURATE MERCURY FLYBYS

Using Solar Active Region Latitude Analysis to Monitor Solar Cycle Progress

Early Results from the NASA Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2)

Using Solar Active Region Latitude Analysis to Monitor Solar Cycle Progress

PLANETARY MISSIONS FROM GTO USING EARTH AND MOON GRAVITY ASSISTS*

Update on the In-orbit Performances of GIOVE Clocks

Validation of Astrodynamic Formation Flying Models Against SPACE-SI Experiments with Prisma Satellites

Transcription:

1. Introduction Adopting the definition consistent with ubiquitous two-line element sets (TLEs) used to track virtually any artifact orbiting Earth, an orbit count n tallies the number of northbound equator crossings (ascending nodes), typically commencing with n = 1 at launch. Among the highest orbit counts ever achieved is that for Russia's long-lived Mir space station. With its original module launched on 20 February 1986, Mir was deorbited to undergo controlled disposal via incineration by Earth's atmosphere on 23 March 2001 i. The final Mir TLE archived at https://www.space-track.org/ (accessed 24 June 2015) has n = 86,330. During its 5510-day flight history, Mir therefore logged an averaged mean motion < > = 86,330 / 5510 = 15.668 orbits per day. Left to coast in orbit, satellites with proportionally large appendages like Mir's solar arrays would suffer altitude decay from atmospheric drag and undergo uncontrolled atmospheric entry in a matter of months starting at a mean motion > 15.6 orbits per day. Mir stayed aloft for over 15 years because her mean motion was periodically reduced by prograde "reboost" maneuvers intended primarily for the purpose of prolonging orbit lifetime. As a function of time, Mir resembles a saw-tooth curve as atmospheric drag acts over many weeks to increase and reboosts quickly reduce it. Over time, these two effects tend to balance each other. Consequently, initial Space Shuttle mission designs to achieve Mir rendezvous, conducted a year or more before planned launch, would simply coast a current Mir trajectory without atmospheric drag until the planned rendezvous timeframe. Although Mir's location in its orbit would be highly uncertain a year in advance, Mir mean orbit height and its planar orientation would be reasonably accurate. This in turn permits reasonably accurate launch window times to be computed and reasonably accurate rendezvous propellant consumption to be estimated. Accuracy achieved versus Mir's actual orbit on the planned launch date depended on the degree to which two factors were realized. 1) Other than its quasi-periodic saw-tooth variations, Mir's actual versus time curve had to be flat during the no-drag coast. Mir could not be in the process of transitioning to a higher or lower average orbit height during that interval. Likewise, a logistics breakdown or other departure from reboost planning could not result in a significant departure from initial average orbit height. 2) The initial Mir trajectory used to initiate the no-drag coast had to be representative of planned average orbit height during that interval. Typically, this entailed sampling the Mir trajectory about midway between reboosts. On 2 September 2015 at 01:15:13 UT, ISS reached its n = 96,000 milestone after first element launch of Functional Cargo Block (FGB) Zarya on 20 November 1998 ii. To achieve this i Reference https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/mir (accessed 30 August 2015). ii Reference http://www.spaceref.com/iss/elements/fgb.html (accessed 30 August 2015). Daniel R. Adamo 1

milestone, ISS had < > = 96,000 / 6130 = 15.661 orbits per day, remarkably within 0.05% of the value spanning Mir's flight history. This paper will apply the Space Shuttle rendezvous design technique to recent ISS TLEs and predict the range of times at which ISS n = 100,000 can be expected. 2. Method For Estimating Time At An Orbit Count Milestone Several times per week, NASA posts recent and predicted TLEs spanning a two-week interval at http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/realdata/sightings/ssapplications/post/javassop/orbit/iss/svpost. html (accessed ). Table 1 contains an example TLE posted at this URL. Table 1. An example TLE for ISS is reproduced as posted by NASA for public access. The three underlined values are relevant to computing orbit counts at a specified time. 1 25544U 98067A 15243.38161185.00016717 00000-0 10270-3 0 9005 2 25544 51.6444 68.5781 0000859 163.5486 196.5696 15.55301747 39749 Underlined values in Table 1 are defined as follows. 1) Element set UT epoch T 0 = 15243.38161185: the value is expressed in YYDOY.ffffffff format, where YY is the last two digits of the calendar year, DOY is the ordinal day of the calendar year (1 January is DOY = 1; 31 December is DOY = 366 in a leap year), and.ffffffff is the UT day's decimal fraction. The value in Table 1 is equivalent to 31 August 2015 at 09:09:31 UT. Conceivably, T 0 may correspond to any location in the orbit, but NASA TLE postings for ISS compute T 0 immediately past a northbound equator crossing such that the decimal fraction of n is infinitesimal. 2) Mean motion = 15.55301747 orbits per day: the value reflects an analytic compensation for Earth's excess equatorial mass. Ignoring other perturbations, including reboosts, n will increment by an amount very close to every 24 hours. 3) Orbit count n = 3974: the TLE format accommodates an additional digit to the left of the Table 1 example, allowing values from 0 to 99,999 to be posted. But NASA's ISS operations are constrained to an interval 0 < n < 4001, so the value posted at spaceflight.nasa.gov is modulo 4000 of the ascending nodes ISS has tallied since Zarya launch. On 2 September 2015 UT, NASA's ISS n incremented to 4000 before it cycled back to 1. Meanwhile, the value posted at space-track.org incremented from 96,000 to 96,001, where it will continue incrementing until it recycles from 99,999 to 0. Given a milestone orbit count of interest n M, the task is to compute the corresponding epoch T M at which n increments to n M per Equation 1 using underlined data from a single TLE per Table 1. T M = T 0 + (n M - n) / (1) Equation 1 is simple to evaluate using modified Julian dates for T 0 and T M, but accommodating equivalent calendar dates for these epochs on input and output can render it a bit more laborious Daniel R. Adamo 2

to implement. Results from such an implementation are presented in Section 3 for ISS n M = 100,000. 3. Predicted Times At Which ISS Orbit Count Will Reach 100,000 Beginning with the initial TLE of the ISS posting at spaceflight.nasa.gov on 17 June 2015 UT (and correcting posted n for modulo 4000 recycles), Equation 1 has been evaluated for n M = 100,000 with the initial TLE of subsequent postings whenever practical. These evaluations are supplemented by others from space-track.org TLEs immediately before or after an ISS reboost. As illustrated by Figure 1, resulting T M predictions all fall in a brief interval early on 16 May 2016 UT, verifying the Space Shuttle rendezvous design technique to a satisfactory degree. Figure 1. Predicted epoch T M at which ISS orbit count will reach n M = 100,000 is plotted as a function of TLE epoch T 0 assuming coasted no-drag motion between the two epochs. Delays (positive plot slope) in T M are generally due to reboosts; advances (negative plot slope) in T M are generally due to atmospheric drag. Thus, the plot's vertical scale may be regarded as roughly proportional to ISS orbit height. Red data markers are predictions derived from space-track.org TLEs, while blue data markers are predictions derived from spaceflight.nasa.gov TLEs. Daniel R. Adamo 3

Each data marker immediately prior to a Figure 1 reboost is annotated with the associated ISS change in velocity magnitude Δv. Unlike other planned reboosts appearing in Figure 1, the one performed 26 July UT is a Pre-determined Debris Avoidance Maneuver (PDAM). Unplanned PDAMs are typically executed a few times each year in response to an orbiting artifact whose probability of ISS collision is unacceptably high. Plans for subsequent reboosts must then be updated as required to compensate for the PDAM's unexpected effects. In early August 2015, NASA released an ISS reference trajectory update extending well beyond May 2016. This planning product is coordinated among all ISS international partners, and it models both atmospheric drag and reboost orbit perturbations. The August 2015 reference trajectory predicts T M for n M = 100,000 will occur on 16 May 2016 at about 05:00 UT, confirming Figure 1 results are consistent with ISS trajectory planning. Daniel R. Adamo 4

4. Reconstruction Of The Actual n M = 100,000 Milestone As the ISS n M = 100,000 milestone became historic fact, NASA posted bracketing geocentric Cartesian position/velocity state vectors to spaceflight.nasa.gov for epochs on 13 May 2016 at 09:28:33.804 UT (with n = 99,956) and on 16 May 2016 at 12:00:00.000 UT (with n = 100,004). A best-fit ISS ballistic atmospheric drag profile over this bracketing interval leads to an estimate of actual T M =16 May 2016 at 04:37:34.837 UT, with a nadir longitude of 86.078 W. Residuals in semi-major axis and down-track position from the best-fit drag profile indicate the T M estimate is in error by no more than ±0.008 s. Figure 2 illustrates the ISS ground track immediately before and after T M. Figure 2. The ISS ground track is plotted at 30-s intervals (2x2-pixel square markers), with the ISS nadir annotated between the Galapagos Islands and the coast of Ecuador, as the 100,000th orbit is about to begin. Circumscribing this nadir is a circle mapping the ISS horizon. The MET window displays UT in DOY/HH:MM:SS format, where DOY is the ordinal day of year 2016. Earth's nightside hemisphere, in which the annotated nadir is located, contains reverse-field pixels (white on black background). Daniel R. Adamo 5 17 May 2016

The rightmost two data markers plotted in Figure 3 correspond to T 0 epochs bracketing T M for n M = 100,000, and its leftmost data markers span Figure 1's T 0 timescale. Note how effects on predicted T M from aerodynamic drag and reboosts are reduced as T 0 approaches T M. These "leverage" effects equate to reduced negative slopes between reboosts and smaller vertical jumps per unit reboost Δv as T 0 advances and these influences have less time prior to T M in which to act. As an example of reduced reboost Δv leverage, compare the jump in T M from the 0.5 m/s reboost in June 2015 with that from the 0.5 m/s reboost in April 2016. Leverage effects illustrate a fundamental trajectory design precept: for the sake of efficiency, schedule maneuvers and other trajectory control inputs as early as prediction uncertainties permit. Figure 3. Predicted epoch T M at which ISS orbit count will reach n M = 100,000 is plotted as a function of TLE epoch T 0 assuming coasted no-drag motion between the two epochs. Red data markers are predictions derived from space-track.org TLEs, while blue data markers are predictions derived from spaceflight.nasa.gov TLEs. Figure 3 also illustrates the degree to which ISS motion can be controlled via reboosts such that a long-term equilibrium is achieved with aerodynamic drag. If both drag and reboosts are ignored, their net effects impart variations in yearlong predictions amounting to less than 7 hours (about 4 orbits) of ISS motion. Daniel R. Adamo 6 17 May 2016